UGT1A1 polymorphism can predict hematologic toxicity in patients treated with irinotecan.

PURPOSE: Irinotecan (CPT-11) is approved in metastatic colorectal cancer treatment and can cause severe toxicity. The main purpose of our study was to assess the role of different polymorphisms on the occurrence of hematologic toxicities and disease-free survival in high-risk stage III colon cancer patients receiving 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and CPT-11 adjuvant chemotherapy regimen in a prospective randomized trial. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Four hundred patients were randomized in a phase III trial comparing LV5FU2 to LV5FU2 + CPT-11. DNA from 184 patients was extracted and genotyped to detect nucleotide polymorphism: 3435C>T for ABCB1, 6986A>G for CYP3A5, UGT1A1*28 and -3156G>A for UGT1A1. RESULTS: Genotype frequencies were similar in both treatment arms. In the test arm, no significant difference was observed in toxicity or disease-free survival for ABCB1 and CYP3A5 polymorphisms. UGT1A1*28 homozygous patients showed more frequent severe hematologic toxicity (50%) than UGT1A1*1 homozygous patients (16.2%), P = 0.06. Moreover, patients homozygous for the mutant allele of -3156G>A UGT1A1 polymorphism showed more frequent severe hematologic toxicity (50%) than patients homozygous for wild-type allele (12.5%), P = 0.01. This toxicity occurred significantly earlier in homozygous mutant than wild-type homozygous patients (P = 0.043). In a Cox model, the hazard ratio for severe hematologic toxicity is significantly higher for patients with the A/A compared with the G/G genotype [hazard ratio, 8.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-37.2; P = 0.005]. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the clinical utility of identification of UGT1A1 promoter polymorphisms before LV5FU2 + CPT-11 treatment to predict early hematologic toxicity. The -3156G>A polymorphism seems to be a better predictor than the UGT1A1 (TA)(6)TAA>(TA)(7)TAA polymorphism.     

Phase II trial of oral uracil/tegafur plus leucovorin in patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The current study evaluated the efficacy of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) and leucovorin (LV) in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with hormone-refractory metastatic carcinoma of the prostate who had undergone antiandrogen withdrawal and no more than 1 prior chemotherapy treatment were enrolled on a single-institution Phase II trial. Patients were treated with oral UFT at a dose of 300 mg/m2/d and oral LV at a dose of 90 mg/day for 28 days followed by 7 days off therapy on a 35-day cycle regimen. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. There was no response by objective criteria in 9 patients with measurable disease. Four responses by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) criteria (i.e., PSA decrease by > 50%) were noted (15%) lasting a mean of 20.5 weeks. Therapy was generally well tolerated, with 2 patients developing Grade 4 toxicity (1 patient each with diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome) and 4 patients having significant Grade 3 toxicity (anemia, hyperbilirubinemia, and vomiting) (Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria). Six patients had stable disease by clinical, laboratory, and radiologic criteria for an average of 5 cycles of treatment (25 wks). CONCLUSIONS: Although UFT and LV are generally well tolerated in the setting of hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma, the combination has a low level of activity. Its toxicity and activity is similar to that observed when intravenous 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine are given alone. It may be an option for further investigations in combination regimens.     

Phase II study of a triplet regimen of S-1 combined with irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with metastatic gastric cancer: clinical and pharmacogenetic results

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1/irinotecan/oxaliplatin (TIROX) in metastatic gastric cancer (MGC) and the association between treatment outcome and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A polymorphisms.Patients and methodsPatients with previously untreated MGC received S-1 40 mg/m² b.i.d. on days 1–14 and irinotecan 150 mg/m² plus oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² on day 1 every 3 weeks.ResultsForty-four patients were enrolled. In intent-to-treat analysis, the objective response rate was 75%, including the complete response (CR) rate of 14%. The median time to progression and overall survival was 10.2 and 17.6 months, respectively. Ten (26%) of the 39 patients with primary gastric tumor showed biopsy-confirmed gastric CR. Grade 3/4 neutropenia developed in 66% of patients and grade 3 febrile neutropenia in 16%. The most common grade 3 nonhematologic toxic effects were abdominal pain (18%), anorexia (16%), and diarrhea (14%). UGT1A polymorphisms were associated with significantly higher incidence of grade 4 leukopenia (UGT1A1*6), neutropenia (UGT1A1*6, UGT1A6*2, and UGT1A7*3), grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia (UGT1A1*6), and grade 3 abdominal pain (UGT1A1*6).ConclusionsThe TIROX regimen induced marked tumor reduction and promising survival with a manageable toxicity profile in MGC patients. UGT1A genotype may be predictive of TIROX toxicity.     

川东北地区人群结直肠癌患者UGT1A1*28基因多态性与伊立替康所致毒副反应的相关性

目的:观察结直肠癌患者UGT1A1*28基因多态性的分布频率,了解UGT1A1*28基因多态性与结直肠癌患者应用伊立替康联合5-氟尿嘧啶化疗毒副反应的相关性。方法:从384例接受伊立替康联合氟尿嘧啶一线化疗的晚期结直肠癌病例中采外周血提取DNA。采用PCR 法扩增目的基因片段,直接测序法分析UGT1A1*28基因多态性。临床观察并评价患者化疗毒副反应分级,统计分析UGT1A1*28基因表型与化疗毒副反应相关性。结果:全部 384例患者 UGT1A1*28基因多态性分布情况:TA6/6野生基因型287例(74.7％),TA6/7杂合基因型73例（19.0％）,TA7/7纯合基因型24例（6.3％）。化疗毒副反应和UGT1A1*28基因多态性进行临床单因素分析显示UGT1A1*28基因纯合型TA7/7、杂合型TA6/7与3-4度白细胞减少、中性粒细胞减少、腹泻、胆红素升高具有明显相关性（P<0.01）,UGT1A1*28基因纯合型TA7/7及杂合型TA6/7患者发生中性粒细胞减少的风险较UGT1A1*28基因野生型TA6/6患者高5.625倍（OR=5.625）。UGT1A1*28基因纯合型TA7/7和UGT1A1*28基因杂合型TA6/7患者发生腹泻的风险较UGT1A1*28基因野生型TA6/6患者高6.778倍（OR=6.778）。结论:UGT1A1*28基因纯合型TA7/7及杂合型TA6/7患者应用伊立替康化疗后发生重度中性粒细胞减少、重度腹泻的风险高于UGT1A1*28基因野生型TA6/6,为临床伊立替康用药选择、剂量调整、毒副反应的提前干预提供理论依据。     

Pazopanib-Induced Liver Toxicity in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Effect of UGT1A1 Polymorphism on Pazopanib Dose Reduction,Safety, and Patient Outcomes

BackgroundPazopanib can induce liver toxicity in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We assessed the effect of a TA repeat polymorphism in the UGT1A1 (uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1) gene encoding uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 on liver toxicity, dose reductions, and patient outcomes.Patients and MethodsPatients with mRCC treated with first-line pazopanib developing liver toxicity underwent genotyping for the UGT1A1 polymorphism. Liver toxicity was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. Progression-free survival and overall survival were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods.ResultsOf 261 patients, 34 (13%) had developed liver toxicity after a median of 29 days (range, 5-155 days). Grade 4, 3, and 2 alanine aminotransferase or bilirubin had increased in 2 (6%), 17 (50%), and 8 (24%) patients, respectively. The UGT1A1 assessment demonstrated that 18 patients (53%) had TA6/TA7, 7 (21%) had TA7/TA7, and 9 (26%) had wild-type TA6/TA6. The UGT1A1 polymorphism was associated with improved median progression-free survival (TA6/TA6, 5.5 months; TA6/TA7, 34.2 months; TA7/TA7, 22.3 months; unknown UGT1A1 status, 9.2 months; UGT1A1 polymorphisms combined vs. unknown status, P = .021). UGT1A1 polymorphism was associated with improved median overall survival (TA6/TA6, 8.1 months, TA6/TA7 or TA7/TA7 not reached, unknown UGT1A1 status, 16.6 months; UGT1A1 polymorphisms combined vs. unknown status, P = .033). Patients with UGT1A1 polymorphism safely resumed pazopanib at ultra-low doses determined by the degree of liver toxicity and UGT1A1 polymorphism.ConclusionsUGT1A1 polymorphisms were associated with improved outcomes, despite pazopanib interruption and dose reductions. UGT1A1 assessment could improve the management of pazopanib-induced liver toxicity in patients with mRCC.     

Randomised phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin versus intravenous fluorouracil and levofolinate in patients with stage III colorectal cancer who have undergone Japanese D2/D3 lymph node dissection: Final results of JCOG0205

BackgroundNSABP C-06 demonstrated the non-inferiority of oral adjuvant uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin (UFT/LV) to weekly fluorouracil and folinate (5-FU/LV) with respect to disease-free survival (DFS) for stage II/III colon cancer. This is the first report of JCOG0205, which compared UFT/LV to standard 5-FU/levofolinate (l-LV) for stage III colorectal cancer patients who have undergone Japanese D2/D3 lymph node dissection.MethodsPatients were randomised to three courses of 5-FU/l-LV (5-FU 500 mg/m², l-LV 250 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36 every 8 weeks) or five courses of UFT/LV (UFT 300 mg m⁻² day⁻¹, LV 75 mg/day on days 1–28 every 5 weeks). The primary end-point was DFS. The sample size was 1100 determined with one-sided alpha of 0.05, power of 0.78 and non-inferiority margin of hazard ratio of 1.27. This trial is registered with UMIN-CTR (C000000193).FindingsBetween February 2003 and November 2006, 1,101 patients (1092 eligible patients) were randomised to 5-FU/l-LV (n = 550) or UFT/LV (n = 551). Median age: 61 years, colon/rectum: 67%/33%, number of positive nodes ⩽3/>3: 73%/27%, stage IIIa/IIIb: 75%/25%. The hazard ratio of DFS was 1.02 (91.3% confidence interval, 0.84–1.23), demonstrating the non-inferiority of UFT/LV (P = 0.0236). Five-year overall survival (87.5%) was higher than that in NSABP C-06 (69.6%). Grade 3/4 toxicities were 8.4% neutropenia in 5-FU/l-LV and 8.7% alanine aminotransferase elevation in UFT/LV, respectively. The incidences of diarrhoea (9.6% versus 8.5%) and anorexia (4.0% versus 3.7%) were similar between the two arms. No treatment-related deaths were reported.InterpretationAdjuvant UFT/LV is non-inferior to standard 5-FU/l-LV with respect to DFS. UFT/LV should be an oral treatment option for patients with stage III colon cancer who have undergone Japanese D2/D3 lymph node dissection.     

UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms are correlated with irinotecan-induced toxicity: a system review and meta-analysis in Asians

Purpose

Previous studies confirmed that genotyping uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1*28 polymorphisms could predict the side effects in cancer patients using irinotecan (IRI) and then reduce IRI-induced toxicity by preventative treatment or decrease in dose. However, the association between UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms and IRI-induced severe toxicity in Asian patients is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms and IRI-induced severe neutropenia as well as diarrhea in Asian patients.

Methods

We searched all papers on PubMed and Embase from February 1998 to August 2013. Then we assessed the methodologies quality, extracted data and made statistics analysis using STATA software. To uncover the sources of heterogeneity, subgroup meta-analysis was conducted according to the dosage of IRI.

Results

Eleven papers were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria after searching Pubmed and Embase. Overall, an increased risk of severe toxicity in Asian patients with UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms was found. Patients with heterozygous variant of UGT1A1*6 showed an increased risk [odds ratio (OR) = 1.98, 95 % confidence intervals (CI) 1.45–2.71, P < 0.001], and homozygous mutation showed an even higher risk (OR = 4.44, 95 % CI 2.42–8.14, P < 0.001) for severe neutropenia. For severe diarrhea, heterozygous variant of UGT1A1*6 showed no significant risk, while the homozygous variant performed a notable risk (OR = 3.51, 95 % CI 1.41–8.73, P = 0.007). Subgroup meta-analysis indicated that for patients harboring either heterozygous or homozygous variant, low dose of IRI also presented comparably increased risk in suffering severe neutropenia.

Conclusion

In this meta-analysis, UGT1A1*6 polymorphisms were revealed as potential biomarkers, predicting IRI-induced severe toxicity in patients from Asia, and increased incidences of severe neutropenia could occur in both high/medium and low doses of IRI.     

The value of genetic polymorphisms to predict toxicity in metastatic colorectal patients with irinotecan-based regimens

Purpose

We are trying to identify predictive factors of high risk of toxicity by analyzing candidate genes in the irinotecan pathways in order to identify useful tools to improve mCRC patient management under real practice conditions.

Methods

Genomic DNA was genotyped for UGT1A1 (*28, *60 and *93) from all 101 patients, and irinotecan dose was 180 mg/m² every second week. Clinical data were obtained by retrospective chart review. The primary endpoint is to find out whether the pharmacogenetic test in the clinical practice may predict toxicity.

Results

Grade 3/4 diarrhea occurred in twelve patients and required dose reduction in six patients, and neutropenia reached grade 3/4 in 19 patients (only one patient with *28/*28 genotype). The UGT1A1*93 seemed to relate with grade 3/4 neutropenia but only in the heterozygote state (G/A), p = 0.071, and UGT1A*60 showed no association with neutropenia. Twenty-eight percentage of patients required the use of G-CSF; 64.3 % of them harbored *1/*28 or *28/*28 genotypes, p = 0.003. Thirty-seven (36.6 %) patients required dose reduction of irinotecan and/or 5-FU owing to toxicity, mainly neutropenia and diarrhea. No significant association was detected between *28, *60 and *93 UGT1A variants and severe irinotecan-associated hematologic or GI toxicity.

Conclusion

The impact of increased risk of toxicity attributed to the UGT1A variants may be offset by irinotecan in clinical practice by dose reduction or the use of colony-stimulating factor.     

Oral uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy and salvage therapy with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and toxicity of uracil/ftorafur (UFT) plus oral leucovorin (LV) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and salvage chemotherapy with weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/LV 24 h infusion. METHODS: Adult patients with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic diseases were enrolled to receive oral UFT 300 mg/m(2)/d plus LV 90 mg/d for 28 days. Treatment was given continuously for 28 days followed by a 7 day rest period from all treatment. For UFT failed patients, weekly 24 h infusion of 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2) plus LV 100 mg/m(2) was used as salvage therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled in the study. The objective response rate was 29.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.8-45.2%] among the 44 evaluable patients and 25.5% in the intent-to-treat population. The median survival for all 51 patients was 16.6 months. The median time to progression was 5.9 months. Diarrhea was the major adverse effect of UFT/LV that made patients reduce dosage. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea developed in 13.7% of patients. Twenty-six patients were treated with weekly 24 h infusional 5-FU/LV as salvage therapy and only two patients responded. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that this 28 day schedule of UFT/LV regimen may offer a well-tolerated, full oral treatment option with efficacy that appears comparable to that of intravenous 5-FU/LV regimens. Parenteral 5-FU/LV as salvage therapy for UFT refractory patients is not recommended.     

Patient preference and pharmacokinetics of oral modulated UFT versus intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin: a randomised crossover trial in advanced colorectal cancer

The aim of this study was to determine the patient's preference for oral UFT/leucovorin (LV) or intravenous (i.v.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/LV chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer and to compare 5-FU exposure with these two treatment options. A total of 37 previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer were randomised to start treatment with either oral UFT 300 mg/m2/day plus oral LV 90 mg/day for 28 days every 5 weeks or i.v. 5-FU 425 mg/m2/day plus LV 20 mg/m2/day for 5 days every 4 weeks. For the second treatment cycle, patients were crossed-over to the alternative treatment regimen. Prior to the first and after the second therapy cycle, patients were required to complete a therapy preference questionnaire (TPQ). The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU were determined by taking blood samples on days 8, 15 or 22 and 28 for UFT and on days 1 and 5 for i.v. 5-FU. 36 patients were eligible. 84% of the patients preferred oral UFT over i.v. 5-FU. After having experienced both treatment modalities, patients indicated taking the medication at home, less stomatitis and diarrhoea, and pill over injection as the most important reasons for their preference. The area under the plasma concentration curve (AUC) for 5-FU after UFT administration was 113 microM x min on day 8, 114 on day 15 and 98 on day 28; the peak levels (Cmax) were 1.2, 1.3 and 1.0 microM, respectively. The AUC for the 5-FU/LV courses was 3083 microM x min for day 1 and 3809 for day 5 (P=0.002). The Cmax was 170.1 and 196.2 microM (P=0.06) and the clearance 2.6 and 1.9 l/min, respectively (P=0.002). Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer clearly preferred oral over i.v. chemotherapy treatment. This choice was most importantly influenced by convenience and toxicity considerations. Although i.v. bolus 5-FU leads to higher peak 5-FU concentrations and AUC values compared with oral UFT, this pharmacokinetic advantage of i.v. 5-FU seems to translate mainly into higher toxicity as seen in large randomised studies comparing oral UFT/LV with i.v. 5-FU/LV. Oral UFT/LV compares favourably with i.v. 5-FU/LV in terms of toxicity and patient's preference and leads to prolonged 5-FU exposure, which is comparable to continuous i.v. 5-FU treatment.     

UGT1A1*28 and Other UGT1A Polymorphisms as Determinants of Irinotecan Toxicity

Abstract

Irinotecan is a drug commonly used for the treatment of cancer patients, both as a single agent or in combination therapy. Neutropenia and diarrhea are the dose-limiting toxicities. Genetic variations of proteins involved in irinotecan metabolism and transport have been considered in the development of irinotecan toxicity. In particular, polymorphisms affecting UDP-glucuronosyltransferase isoform 1A1 (UGT1A1) expression or activity are being investigated. Among these, UGT1A1*28 has been considered as the major predictive pharmacogenetic marker for severe hematological toxicity (neutropenia). However, translation to clinical practice of UGT1A1*28 testing as a predictive marker of adverse effects needs to be further investigated and the available data are not conclusive in defining a precise genotype-based dosage.

Further prospective studies are required to reach a personalization of chemotherapy with irinotecan.     

Polymorphisms of UDP-glucuronosyltransferase gene and irinotecan toxicity: a pharmacogenetic analysis

Irinotecan unexpectedly causes severe toxicity of leukopenia or diarrhea. Irinotecan is metabolized to form active SN-38, which is further conjugated and detoxified by UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 enzyme. Genetic polymorphisms of the UGT1A1 would affect an interindividual variation of the toxicity by irinotecan via the alternation of bioavailability of SN-38. In this case-control study, retrospective review of clinical records and determination of UGT1A1 polymorphisms were performed to investigate whether a patient with the variant UGT1A1 genotypes would be at higher risk for severe toxicity by irinotecan. All patients previously received irinotecan against cancer in university hospitals, cancer centers, or large urban hospitals in Japan. We identified 26 patients who experienced severe toxicity and 92 patients who did not. The relationship was studied between the multiple variant genotypes (UGT1A1*28 in the promoter and UGT1A1*6, UGT1A1*27, UGT1A1*29, and UGT1A1*7 in the coding region) and the severe toxicity of grade 4 leukopenia (< or =0.9 x 10(9)/liter) and/or grade 3 (watery for 5 days or more) or grade 4 (hemorrhagic or dehydration) diarrhea. Of the 26 patients with the severe toxicity, the genotypes of UGT1A1*28 were homozygous in 4 (15%) and heterozygous in 8 (31%), whereas 3 (3%) homozygous and 10 (11%) heterozygous were found among the 92 patients without the severe toxicity. Multivariate analysis suggested that the genotype either heterozygous or homozygous for UGT1A1*28 would be a significant risk factor for severe toxicity by irinotecan (P < 0.001; odds ratio, 7.23; 95% confidence interval, 2.52-22.3). All 3 patients heterozygous for UGT1A1*27 encountered severe toxicity. No statistical association of UGT1A1*6 with the occurrence of severe toxicity was observed. None had UGT1A1*29 or UGT1A1*7. We suggest that determination of the UGT1A1 genotypes might be clinically useful for predicting severe toxicity by irinotecan in cancer patients. This research warrants a prospective trial to corroborate the usefulness of gene diagnosis of UGT1A1 polymorphisms prior tb irinotecan chemotherapy.     

Biweekly oxaliplatin plus 1-day infusional fluorouracil/leucovorin followed by metronomic chemotherapy with tegafur/uracil in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose Metronomic chemotherapy, at a minimally toxic dose and with a frequent schedule, is a potentially novel approach to the control of advanced cancer disease via a different mechanism from maximum tolerable doses chemotherapy. Taking advantage of the potential effectiveness of metronomic therapy, tegafur/uracil (UFT) was incorporated into an oxaliplation/infusioanl fluouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) protocol in this study. The primary endpoints were response rate, time to progression (TTP) and safety profile in 5-FU-pretreated metastatic colorectal cancers (CRCs). Patients and methods Twenty-eight patients with metastatic CRCs resistant or refractory to 5-FU/LV were enrolled. Chemotherapy was administrated every 2 weeks sequentially with 2-h infusion of oxaliplatin (85 mg/m²) and LV (200 mg/m²), intravenous bolus 5-FU (400 mg/m²), 22-h infusion of 5-FU (600 mg/m²) on day 1 and then followed by 10-day daily oral UFT (200 mg/m²)/LV (30 mg/m²). Results Partial response was seen in ten (35.7%) patients. The median TTP was 5.2 (95% CI: 4.16–6.31) months and the median overall survival was 13.4 (95% CI: 6.39–20.5) months. No grade 3 toxicities above 5% according to National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) occurred except sensory neuropathy (10.7%). No grade 4 toxicity, treatment-related mortality or hand–foot syndrome was found. Conclusions This study protocol with favorable toxicity profile is thus promisingly effective against 5-FU-pretreated metastatic CRCs. Given the present experience, an evaluation of the regimen as front-line treatment of metastatic CRC is planned.     

Phase II trial of uracil/tegafur (UFT) plus leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: A University of Chicago phase II consortium study

Background/objectives: Uracil and tegafur in a 4 : 1 molar concentration ratio (UFT; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) has broad anti-tumor activity for cancers arising from the gastrointestinal tract. However, there are no published data regarding the efficacy of leucovorin-modulated UFT in patients with pancreatic cancer. The objective of this trial was to determine the activity and evaluate the toxicity of UFT plus oral calcium leucovorin in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.Patients and methods: Fourteen patients with advanced measurable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were enrolled onto the trial. Patients received 300 mg/m²/d UFT plus 90 mg/d leucovorin administered orally in divided doses every eight hours for 28 days repeated every 35 days. Objective tumor response was evaluated after two courses of therapy.Results: Fourteen patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. No objective responses were seen. The median (range) time to progression and survival were 14 (1.6–37), and 15 (1.9–62) weeks, respectively. Toxicity was mild with severe (grade 3 or 4) hyperbilirubinemia, pain, diarrhea, transaminitis, venous thrombus, weakness, renal failure, confusion, and edema/ascites seen in three (21%), one (7%), two (14%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), one (7%), and two (14%) patients, respectively.Conclusion: In the 14 patients evaluable, UFT 300 mg/m²/d plus oral leucovorin 90 mg/d administered for 28 days did not demonstrate anti-tumor activity against advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma; however, this oral regimen was well tolerated and devoid of neutropenia, significant oral mucositis or diarrhea.     

Phase I trial of UFT/leucovorin and irinotecan in patients with advanced cancer

UFT (BMS-200604, Uftoral) is an oral fluoropyrimidine that combines uracil and the 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug, ftorafur, in a 4:1 molar ratio with single-agent activity in breast and gastrointestinal cancers. In vitro studies have shown that irinotecan downregulates thymidylate synthase (TS) expression in tumour cells, leading to synergy between irinotecan and 5-FU that is maximal when irinotecan is given 24 h prior to 5-FU. Given this observed synergy and the confirmatory clinical activity of combination therapy with 5-FU, leucovorin (LV) and irinotecan, we performed a phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of UFT, LV, and irinotecan. Treatment consisted of irinotecan administered as a 90-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion on day 1 followed by twice daily oral UFT/LV on days 2-15, repeated every 21 days. Initial doses were irinotecan 200 mg/m(2) and UFT 200 mg/m(2)/day, with LV dose fixed at 60 mg/day. 31 patients received a total of 130 cycles of UFT/LV and irinotecan. 3 of 9 patients experienced grade 3/4 diarrhoea at the highest dose level of irinotecan 310 mg/m(2) and UFT 300 mg/m(2)/day. Other toxicities included neutropenia, anaemia, alopecia, nausea/vomiting and fatigue. Further dose escalation was not pursued since this level of toxicity was appropriate for future phase II study. One patient with colorectal cancer experienced a partial response and 9 patients with non-small cell lung, colorectal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinomas had disease stabilisation lasting 4-26 (median 6) cycles. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T genotype was analysed in peripheral mononuclear cells (PMNs) obtained from 24 patients. 2 patients had the homozygous TT polymorphism and 1 of them had grade 3 diarrhoea at the first dose level. Irinotecan on day 1 followed by a 14-day course of oral UFT/LV beginning on day 2 is well tolerated, and suitable for testing in several tumour types. Doses recommended for further study on this schedule are irinotecan 310 mg/m(2) and UFT 300 mg/m(2)/day, with LV 60 mg/day.     

A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral uracil,ftorafur, and leucovorin in patients with advanced cancer

 A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of oral uracil, ftorafur, and leucovorin was performed in patients with advanced cancer. Uracil plus ftorafur (UFT) was given in a 4:1 molar ratio in three divided doses for 28 consecutive days. Patient cohorts were treated at 200, 250, 300, and 350 mg/m² of UFT daily. For all patients, 150 mg of leucovorin was given daily in three oral doses. A 1-week rest period followed each 28-day treatment course. Gastrointestinal toxicity, characterized by diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting, was dose-limiting at 350 mg/m² UFT in patients who had received prior chemotherapy. Mild fatigue and transient hyperbilirubinemia were also common. In previously untreated patients, UFT at 350 mg/m² was well-tolerated, suggesting this as an acceptable phase II dose in this schedule with leucovorin. Two of eight previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer had partial responses with UFT (350 mg/m²) plus leucovorin. Pharmacokinetic parameters [ftorafur, uracil, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 5-methyltetrahydrofolate] showed wide interpatient variations. Plasma levels of 5-FU (C_max 1.4±1.9 μM) were comparable to those achieved with protracted venous infusions, and folate levels (C_max 6.1±3.6 μM) were sufficient for biochemical modulation. Ongoing study will determine if this convenient oral regimen will compare favorably in terms of efficacy, toxicity, and cost with intravenous fluoropyrimidine programs. Received: 20 January 1995/Accepted: 29 June 1995     

Impact of UGT1A1 genetic polymorphism on toxicity in unresectable pancreatic cancer patients undergoing FOLFIRINOX

Studies have indicated an association between UDP‐glucuronosyltransferase‐1A1 (UGT1A1) genetic polymorphisms and irinotecan‐induced toxicity. We undertook this study to investigate the association between UGT1A1 genetic polymorphisms and toxicity in patients treated with the FOLFIRINOX (comprising oxaliplatin, irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin) chemotherapy regimen in the JASPAC 06 study. Patients screened for UGT1A1*6 and UGT1A1*28, and treated with either the original FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², irinotecan 180 mg/m², leucovorin 200 mg/m², bolus 5‐fluorouracil [5‐FU] 400 mg/m², and continuous 5‐FU 2400 mg/m²) or a modified FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m², irinotecan 150 mg/m², leucovorin 200 mg/m², and continuous 5‐FU 2400 mg/m²) as first‐line chemotherapy were included. Of 199 patients eligible for this analysis, 79 patients were treated with the original FOLFIRINOX regimen and 120 patients were treated with the modified FOLFIRINOX regimen. In the original FOLFIRINOX group, 54 were UGT1A1 WT, and 25 were UGT1A1 heterozygous type (?/*6, 12 patients; ?/*28, 13 patients). In the modified FOLFIRINOX group, 64 were UGT1A1 WT and 56 were UGT1A1 heterozygous type (?/*6, 33 patients; ?/*28, 23 patients). In the original FOLFIRINOX group, the incidence of diarrhea was significantly higher among patients with UGT1A1 heterozygous type than among those with UGT1A1 WT and the incidence of leukopenia and diarrhea was significantly higher among patients with UGT1A1 ?/*6 than among those with UGT1A1 ?/*28. Patients with UGT1A1 heterozygous type, especially those with UGT1A1 ?/*6, tended to show a higher incidence rate of severe adverse events, but this was not statistically significant. However, for patients who received the modified FOLFIRINOX, there was no difference in the frequency of adverse events due to UGT1A1 status. In conclusion, patients with heterozygous UGT1A1 polymorphisms treated with the original FOLFIRINOX regimen experienced severe toxicity more frequently than patients with WT UGT1A1.     

Etoposide,Leucovorin (LV) and 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) in 5-FU+LV Pre-Treated Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer

Abstract

In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the weekly combination of etoposide, leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) when administered as second-line chemotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory advanced colorectal cancer (ACC), previously treated with weekly LV+5-FU. Etoposide was administered at 3 different dose levels (DLs), in 3 groups of 20 patients each (total: 60); DL-I: etoposide 80 mg/m², DL-II: etoposide 120 mg/m², and DL-III: etoposide 180 mg/m², in 45 min i.v. infusion, and followed in all levels by LV 100 mg/m² i.v. over 1 hour and 5-FU 500 mg/m² i.v. bolus. Treatment was administered weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. No patients at DL-I responded, while 2 patients at DL-II and 3 at DL-III had a partial response (PR). Stable disease (SD) rates were as follows; at DL-I: 2, DL-II: 8 and DL-III: 9. More patients in DL-I progressed (n=19) compared to DL-II (n=10) and DL-III (n=8) (p<0.0007). Time to progression was for DL-I, -II, -III: 17, 15, and 14 weeks, respectively. Median survival was DL-I, -II, -III: 30, 30, and 32.5 weeks, respectively. Toxicity consisted mainly of neu-tropenia, diarrhea and mucositis at all DLs, and was significantly more severe in DL-III. No difference was noted in responses between DL-II and DL-III. The authors conclude that the combination of etoposide with LV+5-FU has limited activity when administered after failure of weekly LV+5-FU in patients with ACC and should not be recommended for further evaluation.     

Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase III study was designed to demonstrate equivalence in survival of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) and oral leucovorin (LV) to conventional intravenous (IV) fluorouracil (5-FU) and LV in previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Safety was also compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred sixteen patients were randomized to receive either UFT (300 mg/m(2)/d) and LV (75 or 90 mg/d) for 28 days every 35 days or IV bolus 5-FU (425 mg/m(2)/d) and LV (20 mg/m(2)/d) for 5 days every 28 days. RESULTS: UFT/LV produced survival comparable to the IV 5-FU/LV regimen. Median survival was 12.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.2 to 13.6 months) with UFT/LV and 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.6 to 15.4 months) with 5-FU/LV (P =.630). The hazard ratio for survival was 0.964 (95.6% CI, 0.826 to 1.125), supporting equivalent survival. The overall response rate did not differ between treatment arms (UFT/LV, 11.7%; 5-FU/LV, 14.5%; P =.232). Median time to progression favored 5-FU/LV (UFT/LV, 3.5 months; 5-FU/LV, 3.8 months; P =.011), but tumor assessment schedules differed between arms. UFT/LV significantly improved safety compared with 5-FU/LV. Diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, and stomatitis and mucositis were significantly less frequent with UFT/LV, as was myelosuppression. Patients treated with UFT/LV had fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia (P <.001) and documented infections (P <.05). Increased bilirubin, without other liver function abnormalities, was observed more often with UFT/LV (P <.001). Concomitant medications were more frequent with 5-FU/LV, including use of antibiotics, growth factors, and antiemetics. CONCLUSION: UFT/LV provided a safer, more convenient oral alternative to a standard bolus IV 5-FU/LV regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer while producing equivalent survival.     

Bioavailability and phase II study of oral UFT plus leucovorin in patients with relapsed or refractory colorectal cancer

Purpose: This study was undertaken to address the influence of concurrent administration on the pharmacokinetics of UFT (uracil plus tegafur) and leucovorin (LV), and to measure the antitumor activity of a 28-consecutive-day oral regimen of UFT plus LV in patients with relapsed or refractory colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients with advanced measurable colorectal cancer who had failed previous therapy with intravenous bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) were eligible. Patients were treated with UFT 300 mg/m² per day plus LV 90 mg per day in three divided doses every 8 h for 28 days, repeated at 35-day intervals. In addition, a three-treatment by three-period crossover bioavailability comparison of oral LV 30 mg plus UFT 200 mg versus either LV or UFT alone was scheduled for the 8 days preceding the first cycle of therapy. Results: Of 19 patients enrolled, 18 were assessable for pharmacokinetics and response. When LV was coadministered with UFT, there were no statistically significant effects on tegafur, uracil, or 5-FU C_max, AUC, or T_max, with the exception of a delayed T_max for tegafur (P = 0.03). No statistically significant differences were found in LV and 5-methyltetrahydrofolate plasma levels when LV was administered alone or with UFT. However, wide interpatient variability was observed for all parameters. There were no antitumor responses seen. Conclusions: Although the T_max for tegafur is delayed with the concurrent administration of LV, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in any pharmacologic parameters that are of likely clinical significance. However, the great interpatient variability observed in UFT and LV pharmacology may have obscured true bioavailability effects in this small patient population. Daily oral UFT plus LV is inactive as second-line therapy in patients who have failed bolus 5-FU. Received: 13 March 1998 / Accepted: 1 June 1998