First-line bevacizumab plus taxane-based chemotherapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: safety and efficacy in an open-label study in 2251 patients

BackgroundFirst-line bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy significantly improves efficacy versus chemotherapy alone in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC). This large, open-label study further assesses first-line bevacizumab with taxane-based chemotherapy in routine oncology practice.Patients and methodsPatients with HER2-negative LR/mBC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of zero to two and no prior chemotherapy for LR/mBC received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks plus taxane-based chemotherapy (or other non-anthracycline chemotherapy) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient withdrawal. The primary end point was safety; time to progression (TtP) was a secondary end point.ResultsMedian follow-up in 2251 treated patients was 12.7 months. Median age was 53 years and 94% of patients had ECOG PS of zero or one. Bevacizumab was most commonly administered with single-agent paclitaxel (35%), single-agent docetaxel (33%) or taxane-based combination therapy (10%). The most frequent grade ≥3 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (5.4%). Grade ≥3 AEs previously associated with bevacizumab included hypertension (4.4%), arterial/venous thromboembolism (3.2%), proteinuria (1.7%) and bleeding (1.4%). No new bevacizumab safety signals were observed. Median TtP was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval 9.1–9.9).ConclusionsThe study population in ATHENA was more representative of general oncology practice than populations enrolled into randomised trials, although there may have been some bias towards younger, fitter patients. The safety and efficacy of bevacizumab–taxane therapy in this large study were consistent with results from randomised first-line trials.     

First-line bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: pooled and subgroup analyses of data from 2447 patients

BackgroundBevacizumab has consistently demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate when combined with first-line chemotherapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). However, the lack of a significant overall survival (OS) difference continues to attract debate, and identification of patients deriving greatest benefit from bevacizumab remains elusive.Patients and methodsIndividual patient data from three randomised phase III trials in the first-line HER2-negative mBC setting were analysed, focusing specifically on efficacy in poor-prognosis patients.ResultsThe meta-analysis (n = 2447) demonstrated a PFS hazard ratio (HR) of 0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57–0.71; median 9.2 months with bevacizumab versus 6.7 months with non-bevacizumab therapy) and response rate of 49% versus 32%, respectively. The OS HR was 0.97 (95% CI 0.86–1.08); median 26.7 versus 26.4 months, respectively. In patients with triple-negative mBC, the HRs for PFS and OS were 0.63 (95% CI 0.52–0.76) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.79–1.16), respectively. Median PFS was 8.1 months with bevacizumab versus 5.4 months with chemotherapy alone, median OS was 18.9 versus 17.5 months, respectively, and 1-year OS rates were 71% versus 65%.ConclusionsBevacizumab improves efficacy, including 1-year OS rates, both overall and in subgroups of poor-prognosis patients with limited treatment options.     

Safety and efficacy of bevacizumab combined with taxanes in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer: ATHENA study-France

The efficacy of the combination bevacizumab-chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) was demonstrated in several randomized clinical trials. However, limited safety data is available in daily medical practice. ATHENA is an international phase-IIIb study conducted in 2,251 patients with locally advanced or mBC, treated in first-line with bevacizumab combined with taxanes-based chemotherapy. The primary objective is safety assessment. In France, 365 patients were included. Their median age was 56 years (24-93 years) and ECOG performance status was 0 or 1 in 93.9% of patients. Bevacizumab was essentially combined with a taxanes monotherapy: docetaxel (37.3%) or paclitaxel (28.8%) or taxanes-based combination therapy (9.4%). The most frequent grade superior or equal to 3 adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (34.5%). Grade superior or equal to 3 AEs of special interest related to bevacizumab were arterial and venous thromboembolism (5.1%), high blood pressure (4.2%), proteinuria (2.3%) and hemorrhage (2%). Median time to progression was 9.5 months (95% CI: 8.8-10.4). The safety profile and the efficacy of the combination bevacizumab-taxanes in a population more representative of daily oncology practice in France are comparable to those reported in clinical trials in mBC.     

First-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for breast cancer: results in patients aged ≥70 years treated in the ATHENA study

BackgroundThere are limited data on treatment outcomes in the growing population of elderly patients with locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC). To gain information on first-line bevacizumab combined with chemotherapy in the elderly, we analyzed data from the ATHENA trial in routine oncology practice.Patients and methodsPatients with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative LR/mBC received first-line bevacizumab with standard chemotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or physician/patient decision. We carried out a subgroup analysis of safety and efficacy in patients aged ≥70 years. Possible correlations between tolerability and baseline comorbidities or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status were explored.ResultsBevacizumab was combined with single-agent paclitaxel in 46% of older patients. Only hypertension and proteinuria were more common in older than in younger patients (grade ≥3 hypertension: 6.9% versus 4.2%, respectively; grade ≥3 proteinuria: 4.0% versus 1.5%, respectively). Grade ≥3 arterial/venous thromboembolism occurred in 2.9% versus 3.3%, respectively. Further analysis revealed no relationship between baseline presence and severity of hypertension and risk of developing hypertension during bevacizumab-containing therapy. Median time to progression was 10.4 months in patients aged ≥70 years.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that bevacizumab-containing therapy is tolerable and active in patients aged ≥70 years. Hypertension was more common than in younger patients but was manageable. We find no evidence precluding the use of bevacizumab in older patients, including those with hypertension, although age may influence chemotherapy choice.     

Final results of the TANIA randomised phase III trial of bevacizumab after progression on first-line bevacizumab therapy for HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer

BackgroundThe randomised phase III TANIA trial demonstrated that continuing bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy for locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC) after progression on first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with chemotherapy alone [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–0.93]. We report final results from the TANIA trial, including overall survival (OS) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).Patients and methodsPatients with HER2-negative LR/mBC that had progressed on or after first-line bevacizumab plus chemotherapy were randomised to receive standard second-line chemotherapy either alone or with bevacizumab. At second progression, patients initially randomised to bevacizumab continued bevacizumab with their third-line chemotherapy, but those randomised to chemotherapy alone were not allowed to cross over to receive third-line bevacizumab. The primary end point was second-line PFS; secondary end points included third-line PFS, combined second- and third-line PFS, OS, HRQoL and safety.ResultsOf the 494 patients randomised, 483 received second-line therapy; 234 patients (47% of the randomised population) continued to third-line study treatment. The median duration of follow-up at the final analysis was 32.1 months in the chemotherapy-alone arm and 30.9 months in the bevacizumab plus chemotherapy arm. There was no statistically significant difference between treatment arms in third-line PFS (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.59–1.06), combined second- and third-line PFS (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.68–1.05) or OS (HR = 0.96, 95% CI 0.76–1.21). Third-line safety results showed increased incidences of proteinuria and hypertension with bevacizumab, consistent with safety results for the second-line treatment phase. No differences in HRQoL were detected.ConclusionsIn this trial, continuing bevacizumab beyond first and second progression of LR/mBC improved second-line PFS, but no improvement in longer term efficacy was observed. The second-line PFS benefit appears to be achieved without detrimentally affecting quality of life.ClinicalTrials.govNCT01250379.     

Bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel as first-line therapy for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MERiDiAN): A double-blind placebo-controlled randomised phase III trial with prospective biomarker evaluation

AimMERiDiAN evaluated plasma vascular endothelial growth factor-A (pVEGF-A) prospectively as a predictive biomarker for bevacizumab efficacy in metastatic breast cancer (mBC).MethodsIn this double-blind placebo-controlled randomised phase III trial, eligible patients had HER2-negative mBC previously untreated with chemotherapy. pVEGF-A was measured before randomisation to paclitaxel 90 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15 with either placebo or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15, repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or consent withdrawal. Stratification factors were baseline pVEGF-A, prior adjuvant chemotherapy, hormone receptor status and geographic region. Co-primary end-points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in the intent-to-treat and pVEGF-A_high populations.ResultsOf 481 patients randomised (242 placebo–paclitaxel; 239 bevacizumab–paclitaxel), 471 received study treatment. The stratified PFS hazard ratio was 0.68 (99% confidence interval, 0.51–0.91; log-rank p = 0.0007) in the intent-to-treat population (median 8.8 months with placebo–paclitaxel versus 11.0 months with bevacizumab–paclitaxel) and 0.64 (96% confidence interval, 0.47–0.88; log-rank p = 0.0038) in the pVEGF-A_high subgroup. The PFS treatment-by-VEGF-A interaction p value (secondary end-point) was 0.4619. Bevacizumab was associated with increased incidences of bleeding (all grades: 45% versus 27% with placebo), neutropenia (all grades: 39% versus 29%; grade ≥3: 25% versus 13%) and hypertension (all grades: 31% versus 13%; grade ≥3: 11% versus 4%).ConclusionThe significant PFS improvement with bevacizumab is consistent with previous placebo-controlled first-line trials in mBC. Results do not support using baseline pVEGF-A to identify patients benefitting most from bevacizumab.Clinical trials registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01663727.     

Avastin in the treatment of breast cancer

Over the last decades, various new agents have been developed for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer and overall survival of these patients has increased. The role of chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer is well established. Bevacizumab is a potent antiangiogenic agent active in many solid tumors. Three randomised clinical trials (E2100, AVADO and RIBBON I) proved the benefit of chemotherapy, especially a combination of taxanes and bevacizumab, as the first line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. The combination improved patient progression-free survival in all trials with no impact on the known toxic effects of taxanes. This may be a potent treatment option particularly for patients with triple negative breast cancer, and a potentially less toxic alternative to combination chemotherapy.     

First-line Bevacizumab plus Taxane-based Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: Cost-minimisation Analysis

Aim: To carry out a cost minimisation analysis including a comparison of the costs arising from first-line treatment by bevacizumab plus docetaxel (BD) versus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel (BP) of patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Patient and Methods: All consecutive patients with human epidermal growth receptor 2-negative mBC and treated at Besan?on University hospital between 2006 and 2010 by a first-line therapy containing bevacizumab plus taxane were retrospectively studied. Economic analysis took into account costs related to drugs, hospitalization and healthcare travel. RESULTS: Progression-free survival difference between the two treatments was insignificant (p-value=0.31). BP treatment was associated with a higher mean total cost than that of BD treatment, €53,093±34,395 versus €60,196±48,766, respectively. CONCLUSION: Whereas bevacizumab is recommended for first-line treatment of mBC with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy, our study has shown that BD treatment is the most cost-efficient regimen. It could be an attractive option in France, with a potential cost saving of €24,000,000 per year.     

Final overall survival results and effect of prolonged (≥ 1 year) first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for metastatic breast cancer in the ATHENA trial

The ATHENA study expanded on the safety and efficacy data derived from first-line trials of bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy for locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC). In ATHENA, 2,264 patients received first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy in routine oncology practice. Overall survival (OS) data are now mature; additional analyses from this large data set can provide insights into treatment duration and the effect of prolonged bevacizumab exposure, where data are currently limited. Patients with HER2-negative LR/mBC received first-line bevacizumab with standard chemotherapy until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or physician/patient decision. We performed subgroup analyses on data from patients treated for ≥12 months and those who continued single-agent bevacizumab after stopping chemotherapy. After median follow-up of 20.1 months, median OS was 25.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.0–26.3 months) in the entire population. Median OS was 30.0 months (95% CI 28.5–32.7 months) in 1,205 patients who continued bevacizumab after discontinuation of chemotherapy and 18.4 months (95% CI 17.2–19.7 months) in 1,058 patients who discontinued bevacizumab before or at the same time as stopping chemotherapy. Bevacizumab treatment was continued for ≥12 months in 473 patients (21%). In most, bevacizumab was administered as monotherapy for extended periods after stopping chemotherapy. In the subgroup of patients treated for ≥12 months, the median time to onset of grade 3–5 adverse events was 5.0 months. There was no evidence that first onset of adverse events of special interest, except for proteinuria, was more common in later than earlier cycles. No relationship was detected between development of hypertension and OS. Findings from these analyses suggest that patients with LR/mBC can receive bevacizumab for prolonged periods without major toxicity or progression of disease. In the absence of progression, continuation of single-agent bevacizumab appears to be a reasonable approach, with minimal toxicity and the possibility of long-term disease control.     

Anthracyclines and taxanes in the neo/adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: does the sequence matter?

BackgroundIn early breast cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy decreases the risks of recurrence and breast cancer mortality, and neoadjuvant treatment leads to equivalent long-term outcomes. A large number of clinical trials have attempted to refine systemic therapeutic strategies in early breast cancer, but little attention has been paid to the sequence of anthracyclines and taxanes. Based on preclinical observations, there is limited rationale to administer the taxane before the anthracycline.MethodsWe searched PubMed, the American Society of Clinical Oncology website, and clinicaltrials.gov with the goal of identifying published or ongoing studies that aimed at comparing reverse sequences of anthracyclines and taxanes. Given the nature and the small number of studies identified, we did not attempt to quantitatively pool the study results.ResultsWe retrieved seven studies in the adjuvant setting and eight in the neoadjuvant setting: 10 randomized trials (only 2 were phase IIII), 3 retrospective studies, and 2 ongoing phase II trials. A total of nearly 5000 patients were included in such studies. None of the clinical trials has shown disadvantages in terms of efficacy or toxicity for sequences in which the taxane was administered first. In the neoadjuvant setting, studies have collectively shown similar or increased pathological complete response rates for sequences in which the taxane was administered first.ConclusionGiven the available information, there seems to be sufficient evidence to suggest that a taxane followed by an anthracycline is a sequence option that can be incorporated into daily clinical practice.     

Adverse events risk associated with bevacizumab addition to breast cancer chemotherapy: a meta-analysis

BackgroundBevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor with the ability to increase progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the risk of the most clinically relevant adverse outcomes associated with the use of bevacizumab in the treatment of breast cancer.Patients and methodsWe included phase III clinical trials that used bevacizumab alone or in combination with chemotherapy as for MBC or locally recurrent. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate summary odds ratio (OR) of the eight most relevant adverse outcomes related with bevacizumab.ResultsFive clinical trials were included in the meta-analysis. Summary odds ratios obtained showed a statistically significant bevacizumab-associated increased risk in four of the adverse outcomes studied: proteinuria (OR = 27.68), hypertension (OR = 12.76), left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) (OR = 2.25), and hemorrhagic events (OR = 4.07). No statistically significant differences were found for gastrointestinal (GI) perforation, vascular events, fatal events, or febrile neutropenia.ConclusionsBevacizumab did increase the risk of LVD and hemorrhagic events. The addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer was not associated with a significant increase in grade ≥3 arterial or venous thromboembolic events, GI perforation, or fatal events.     

Gemcitabine in the management of metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review

Background

A systematic review of the evidence for gemcitabine chemotherapy, alone or in combination, in women with metastatic/advanced breast cancer was undertaken in order to determine gemcitabine’s role in the first-line and/or second-line or greater setting.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, the American Society of Clinical Oncologists, San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium proceedings, and the Cochrane Library were searched through September 2006 for randomized controlled trials and non-randomized phase two trials.

Results

Eighty-three trials were identified, including four randomized phase III trials. All of the phase III trials included first-line patients. Two of the phase III trails demonstrated clinical benefit with gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in terms of superior efficacy or less toxicity while two phase III trials found no clinical benefit based on less efficacy or increased toxicity. Although 78 phase II trials of gemcitabine alone or in combination with other chemotherapy agents were identified, few combinations showed results compelling enough to warrant randomized trials.

Conclusion

Available data do not support the acceptance of gemcitabine as a standard therapeutic option in women with metastatic breast cancer in the third-line or greater setting, nor should it be considered as first-line therapy in anthracycline naïve women. Gemcitabine appears to be most effective when administered with a taxane (docetaxel/paclitaxel) in the first- or second-line setting, with gemcitabine/taxane combinations representing a viable alternative to currently accepted taxane combinations such as capecitabine/docetaxel. There is no evidence at this time to support the use of gemcitabine triplets, given the equal efficacy to anthracycline triplets and the added toxicity.

     

Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab or paclitaxel as first-line treatment for HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer in a multicenter national observational study

BackgroundBevacizumab combined with paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has led to mixed results in randomized trials, with an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) but no statistically significant overall survival (OS) benefit. Real-life data could help in assessing the value of this combination.Patients and methodsThis study aimed to describe the outcome following first-line paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab in the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) database of MBC patients, established in 2014 by Unicancer. The primary and secondary end points were OS and PFS, respectively.ResultsFrom 2008 to 2013, 14 014 MBC patient files were identified, including 10 605 patients with a HER2-negative status. Of these, 3426 received paclitaxel and bevacizumab (2127) or paclitaxel (1299) as first-line chemotherapy. OS adjusted for major prognostic factors was significantly longer in the paclitaxel and bevacizumab group compared with paclitaxel [hazard ratio (HR) 0.672, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.601–0.752; median survival time 27.7 versus 19.8 months]. Results were consistent in all supportive analyses (using a propensity score for adjustment and as a matching factor for nested case–control analyses) and sensitivity analyses. Similar results were observed for the adjusted PFS, favoring the combination (HR 0.739, 95% CI 0.672–0.813; 8.1 versus 6.4 months).ConclusionsIn this large-scale, real-life setting, patients with HER2-negative MBC who received paclitaxel plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy had a significantly better OS and PFS than those receiving paclitaxel. Despite robust methodology, real-life data are exposed to important potential biases, and therefore, results need to be treated with caution. Our data cannot therefore support extension of current use of bevacizumab in MBC.     

Safety and efficacy of first-line bevacizumab with FOLFOX,XELOX, FOLFIRI and fluoropyrimidines in metastatic colorectal cancer: the BEAT study

BackgroundBevacizumab significantly improves survival when added to chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The Bevacizumab Expanded Access Trial (BEAT) evaluated the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab plus first-line chemotherapy in a general cohort of patients with mCRC.Patients and methodsPatients with unresectable mCRC received chemotherapy (physician's choice) plus bevacizumab [5 mg/kg every 2 weeks (5-fluorouracil regimens) or 7.5 mg/kg every 3 weeks (capecitabine regimens)]. The primary end point was safety, including prospective data collection in patients receiving unanticipated surgery during the study. Secondary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).ResultsThe final analysis comprised 1914 assessable patients (male 58%; median age 59 years). Chemotherapy included 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) + oxaliplatin (29%), irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV (26%), capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (18%) and monotherapy (16%). Serious/grade 3–5 adverse events of interest for bevacizumab included bleeding (3%), gastrointestinal perforation (2%), arterial thromboembolism (1%), hypertension (5.3%), proteinuria (1%) and wound-healing complications (1%). Sixty-day mortality was 3%. Median PFS was 10.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10.4–11.3 months] and median OS reached 22.7 months (95% CI 21.7–23.8 months).ConclusionsThe BEAT study shows that the efficacy and safety profile of bevacizumab in routine clinical practice is consistent with results observed in prospective randomised clinical trials and another large observational study in the United States (BRiTE study).     

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised,phase II/III trials adding bevacizumab to platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BackgroundPrevious studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsSummary data from randomised trials comparing first-line bevacizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone for inoperable locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic NSCLC were meta-analysed. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and pooled odds ratio (OR) for adverse events were calculated. The chi-squared tests evaluated interactions between treatment effects, and prognostic factors and patient characteristics.ResultsData of 2194 patients (1313 bevacizumab; 881 controls) from four phase II and III trials: AVF-0757g, JO19907, ECOG 4599 and AVAiL, were analysed. Compared with chemotherapy alone, bevacizumab significantly prolonged OS (HR 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81, 0.99; P = 0.03), and PFS (0.72; 95% CI 0.66, 0.79; P < 0.001). Bevacizumab showed a significantly greater effect on OS in patients with adenocarcinoma versus other histologies (P = 0.02), and patients with body weight loss ≤5% versus >5% (P = 0.03). Bevacizumab significantly increased the risk of grade ≥3 proteinuria, hypertension, haemorrhagic events, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia.ConclusionsBevacizumab significantly prolonged OS and PFS when added to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC; no unexpected toxicity was evident.     

What is the best schedule for administration of gemcitabine-taxane?

Until recently, standard adjuvant chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) consisted of anthracycline-based regimens, followed by a taxane. However, data suggest that taxane-based combinations can be more effective than taxanes alone for the second part of treatment. Synergy between paclitaxel and gemcitabine was demonstrated in vitro when paclitaxel was followed by gemcitabine. Dose-dense regimens administered every 2 weeks are more effective than standard 3 weekly regimens. In a phase II study, gemcitabine plus paclitaxel every 2 weeks as first-line chemotherapy of MBC was associated with an overall response rate (ORR) of 71%. Women with HER2 ECD-positive tumours have a poor ORR (40%) to first-line chemotherapy. The addition of trastuzumab to dose-dense paclitaxel-gemcitabine as first-line chemotherapy in women with HER2-positive MBC was associated with a dramatic increase in ORR to 78%, with no serious toxicity observed. Two phase III clinical trials of gemcitabine-paclitaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in women with histologically-confirmed MBC are currently underway. Preliminary data show that this drug combination is well-tolerated, and the efficacy results are eagerly awaited.     

Taxanes for breast cancer: an evidence-based review of randomized phase II and phase III trials

The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel have an important role in the treatment of breast cancer, and numerous randomized trials have evaluated their efficacy for this indication. A systematic, evidence-based review was performed, which included all randomized, controlled trials evaluating taxanes for the treatment of early-or advanced-stage breast cancer that were identified in CANCERLIT and MEDLINE searches. The primary objectives of this review were to determine the dose and schedule for each taxane that was associated with the most favorable therapeutic index, and to determine whether (and under what circumstances) the taxanes improved survival. The search revealed 18 randomized phase II (n = 1) or phase III (n = 17) trials. For metastatic breast cancer, the dose and schedule associated with the most favorable therapeutic index for paclitaxel was 175 mg/m2 given as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks, and docetaxel was 60-100 mg/m2 given as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Survival was improved under the following circumstances: (1) when 4 cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) was given following 4 cycles of conventional doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide for axillary node-positive operable breast cancer, (2) when trastuzumab was added to paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer that overexpressed HER2/neu, and (3) when docetaxel was given as second-line therapy for anthracycline-resistant disease. Although a survival benefit was found for taxanes as a component of first-line therapy in two of six trials, the interpretation of both positive trials was confounded by a lack of crossover to taxane therapy in those who were initially randomized to receive standard therapy. The taxanes improve survival in patients with early-stage breast cancer and selected patients with metastatic breast cancer. Further research is necessary in order to identify the efficacy of docetaxel relative to paclitaxel, the optimal dose of docetaxel, the role of weekly taxane therapy, the role of trastuzumab plus taxanes in early-stage disease, and whether taxanes are more effective when given concomitantly or sequentially in patients with early-stage disease.     

Rationale and use of epirubicin-based therapy in the adjuvant setting

The taxanes paclitaxel and docetaxel have an important role in the treatment of breast cancer, and numerous randomized trials have evaluated their efficacy for this indication. A systematic, evidence-based review was performed, which included all randomized, controlled trials evaluating taxanes for the treatment of early- or advanced-stage breast cancer that were identified in CANCERLIT and MEDLINE searches. The primary objectives of this review were to determine the dose and schedule for each taxane that was associated with the most favorable therapeutic index, and to determine whether (and under what circumstances) the taxanes improved survival. The search revealed 18 randomized phase II (n=1) or phase III (n=17) trials. For metastatic breast cancer, the dose and schedule associated with the most favorable therapeutic index for paclitaxel was 175 mg/m2 given as a 3-hour infusion every 3 weeks, and docetaxel was 60-100 mg/m2 given as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks. Survival was improved under the following circumstances: (1) when 4 cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 every 3 weeks) was given following 4 cycles of conventional doxorubicin- cyclophosphamide for axillary node-positive operable breast cancer, (2) when trastuzumab was added to paclitaxel as first-line therapy for metastatic breast cancer that overexpressed HER2/neu, and (3) when docetaxel was given as second-line therapy for anthracycline-resistant disease. Although a survival benefit was found for taxanes as a component of first-line therapy in two of six trials, the interpretation of both positive trials was confounded by a lack of crossover to taxane therapy in those who were initially randomized to receive standard therapy. The taxanes improve survival in patients with early-stage breast cancer and selected patients with metastatic breast cancer. Further research is necessary in order to identify the efficacy of docetaxel relative to paclitaxel, the optimal dose of docetaxel, the role of weekly taxane therapy, the role of trastuzumab plus taxanes in early-stage disease, and whether taxanes are more effective when given concomitantly or sequentially in patients with early-stage disease     

Nasal septum perforation: a side effect of bevacizumab chemotherapy in breast cancer patients

Background:

Bevacizumab is an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor approved in association with paclitaxel or docetaxel as first line in patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer. Rare cases of nasal septum perforations have been reported. We report our experience of nasal perforation in breast cancer pts receiving bevacizumab and chemotherapy either in the adjuvant or in the metastatic settings.

Methods:

Between 1 January and 31 December 2009, 70 pts received bevacizumab together with chemotherapy. All the pts who had received bevacizumab were referred to the ENT specialist. Symptoms potentially related were looked for. Side effects were graded according to CTCAE.

Results:

Five nasal septum perforations were diagnosed (5 out of 70; 7.14%). Bevacizumab dose was 15 mg kg⁻¹ 3 weekly. Three pts were metastatic. Bevacizumab was associated with docetaxel (100 mg m⁻² every 3 weeks) in two pts and with weekly paclitaxel in one. The last two pts received bevacizumab in combination with anthracyclin and then taxanes in the adjuvant setting. In these two cases, nasal septum perforation occurred at the time of docetaxel treatment.

Conclusion:

A high incidence of nasal septum perforation has been shown in pts with breast cancer receiving bevacizumab together with chemotherapy. Several mechanisms could be involved (mucositis, delayed tissue repair, antiangiogenic action of taxanes).     

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel for the first-line treatment of elderly patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer: results from AVADO

Background

Oncologic treatment in elderly patients is challenging, due to comorbidities, often impaired organ function, limited clinical trial evidence, inadequate guidelines and no consistent ‘elderly’ definition. We report exploratory sub-analyses of safety and efficacy in elderly patients, defined as ?65 years old, in AVastin And DOcetaxel (AVADO) receiving first-line bevacizumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer (mBC).

Patients and methods

Patients with HER2-negative, locally recurrent or mBC were randomised to 3-weekly docetaxel (100 mg/m²) with placebo, bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg or bevacizumab 15 mg/kg, for 9 cycles or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients had no prior chemotherapy for mBC.

Results

Progression-free survival (PFS) was increased with bevacizumab in the elderly subpopulation (n = 127), the effect being greater with higher dose (hazard ratio = 0.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.383–1.032] versus 0.76 [95% CI: 0.46–1.262], respectively). PFS was numerically similar in the elderly and overall populations, but the former failed to achieve statistical significance. Overall response rates for docetaxel plus placebo, bevacizumab 7.5 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg were 44.7%, 36.6% and 50.0%, respectively. Effects on survival were not statistically significant. Bevacizumab was well tolerated in elderly patients, the most common adverse effects were neutropenia and febrile neutropenia; there was no excess of grade ? 3 cardiovascular events. There was no clear correlation between baseline hypertension and its development during study treatment.

Conclusions

In this exploratory sub-analysis in AVADO, bevacizumab plus docetaxel showed efficacy in elderly patients similar to the overall study population. There were no unexpected safety signals in patients aged 65 years or older.