When do we need central nervous system prophylaxis in patients with extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma,nasal type?

Background: The incidence and risk factors of central nervous system (CNS) invasion is still unclear in extranodal natural killer (NK)/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type.Patients and methods: We analyzed 208 patients to study the clinical features and outcomes of CNS disease in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma.Results: Twelve patients (5.76%, 12/208) experienced CNS disease during treatment or follow-up period (median 11.62 months, range 0.2–123.2 months). The clinical variables associated with CNS disease were Ann Arbor stage III/IV (15.87%, P <0.001), regional lymph node involvement (10.41%, P = 0.006), group III/IV of NK/T-cell lymphoma prognostic index (NKPI; 10.20%, P = 0.003), high/high–intermediate international prognostic index (9.30%, P = 0.072) and extra-upper aerodigestive primary sites (9.75%, P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, NKPI retained the strongest statistical power to predict CNS disease (P = 0.007, relative risk 9.289, 95% confidence interval 1.828–47.212) in extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma.Conclusions: Despite extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma frequently involves paranasal sinus, a routine CNS evaluation and prophylaxis do not seem to be necessary in NKPI group I or II patients due to a very low incidence. Nevertheless, CNS prophylaxis should be considered in NKPI groups III and IV.     

Ki-67 is a strong predictor of central nervous system relapse in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL)

High Ki-67 is strongly associated with the risk of CNS relapse in patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Two-year incidence of CNS relapse in patients with Ki-67 ≥ 30 exceeds 25%. The incidence was not decreased by rituximab, high-dose cytarabine, high-dose methotrexate or consolidative ASCT. Development of new prophylactic strategies for CNS involvement is mandatory in patients with high Ki-67.BackgroundCentral nervous system (CNS) relapse is an uncommon but challenging complication in patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Survival after CNS relapse is extremely poor. Identification of high-risk populations is therefore critical in determining patients who might be candidates for a prophylactic approach.Patients and methodsA total of 608 patients (median age, 67 years; range 22–92) with MCL newly diagnosed between 1994 and 2012 were evaluated. Pretreatment characteristics and treatment regimens were evaluated for their association with CNS relapse by competing risk regression analysis.ResultsNone of the patients received intrathecal prophylaxis. Overall, 33 patients (5.4%) experienced CNS relapse during a median follow-up of 42.7 months. Median time from diagnosis to CNS relapse was 20.3 months (range: 2.2–141.3 months). Three-year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was 5.6% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 3.7% to 8.0%]. Univariate analysis revealed several risk factors including blastoid variant, leukemic presentation, high-risk MCL International Prognostic Index and high Ki-67 (proliferation marker). Multivariate analyses revealed that Ki-67 ≥ 30 was the only significant risk factor for CNS relapse (hazard ratio: 6.0, 95% CI 1.9–19.4, P = 0.003). Two-year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse in patients with Ki-67 ≥ 30 was 25.4% (95% CI 13.5–39.1), while that in the patients with Ki-67 < 30 was 1.6% (95% CI 0.4–4.2). None of the treatment modalities, including rituximab, high-dose cytarabine, high-dose methotrexate or consolidative autologous stem-cell transplant, were associated with a lower incidence of CNS relapse. Survival after CNS relapse was poor, with median survival time of 8.3 months. There was no significant difference in the survival by the site of CNS involvement.     

Histologic transformation in marginal zone lymphomas

BackgroundHistologic transformation (HT) is a poorly understood event in patients with marginal zone lymphoma (MZL). The aim of this study was to analyze incidence and risk factors for HT in a large series of MZL patients.Patients and methodsThe studied cohort included 340 MZL patients diagnosed and treated between 1995 and 2012: 157 extranodal MZLs [mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, 46%], 85 splenic MZLs (SMZLs, 25%) and 37 nodal MZLs (NMZLs, 11%). Sixty-one patients (18%) had bone marrow infiltration at presentation, with or without detectable involvement of peripheral blood, but without other involved sites; they were considered clonal B-cell lymphocytosis of marginal zone origin (CBL-MZ).ResultsWith a median follow-up of 4.8 years, the median overall survival and progression-free survival of the whole population were 14.5 and 5 years, respectively. HT was observed in 13 cases [3.8%, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2%–6.5%]. Elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) at diagnosis was associated with the risk of HT (P = 0.019). HT occurred in 5% of SMZLs, 4% of MALT lymphomas, 3% of NMZLs and 3% of CBL-MZ (P = 0.974). The risk of HT was 5% (95% CI 3–9%) at 5 and 10 years after diagnosis and 10% (95% CI 5%–20%) at 12 years. At the time of HT, most patients had high LDH and B symptoms. At a median follow-up of 12 months after HT, 4 of 13 patients died, all for lymphoma-related causes, with a 2-year post-transformation survival rate of 57% (95% CI 13%–86%).ConclusionsIn this large retrospective series, the risk of HT across all MZL types appeared lower than the one reported for follicular lymphoma.     

Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes Predict Survival in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Monomorphic Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders

IntroductionThe tumor microenvironment (TME) in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) remains unexplored. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are prognostic in other lymphomas. We assessed the prognostic impact of TILs in monomorphic B-cell PTLD.MethodsTIL density (CD3+ cells/mm²) was determined by CD3 immunohistochemistry in archived diagnostic biopsies from patients diagnosed with monomorphic B-cell PTLD.ResultsAmongst monomorphic PTLDs (N = 107), low TIL-count was associated with inferior 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) (41% versus 86%, P = .003) and 2-year overall survival (OS) (52% versus 93%, P = .003) by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Low TIL-count was significant on Cox univariate regression for inferior PFS (HR 4.5, 95% CI 2.0-9.9, P < .001) and OS (HR 4.6, 95% CI 1.8-11.8, P < .001). Multivariate analysis with clinical variables (age ≥60 years, high LDH, stage III/IV, CNS involvement) and TIL-count showed significance for PFS (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3-8.3, P = .010) and a non-significant trend for OS (HR 2.6, 95% CI 0.9-7.3, P = .064). A composite score including TILs and clinical variables (age ≥60 years, high LDH, stage III/IV, CNS involvement) effectively stratified monomorphic PTLD patients by PFS and OS (2-year OS: low-risk 93%, intermediate-risk 61%, high-risk 23%, P < .001).ConclusionsThe TME and TILs are prognostically relevant in monomorphic PTLD. Prognostic models including measures of the TME may improve risk stratification for patients with monomorphic PTLDs.     

Upfront allogeneic stem-cell transplantation for patients with nonlocalized untreated peripheral T-cell lymphoma: an intention-to-treat analysis from a single center

This study addressed the question of upfront allo-SCT in untreated PTCL patients (n = 49). The 2-year OS rate was 59% but 72.5% for transplanted patients (n = 29). Disease status at the time of transplantation was predictive marker for PFS/OS. This work shows that upfront allo-SCT is feasible with low TRM and provide long-term disease control in PTCLs but one-third of patients is chemo-refractory.BackgroundPeripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) are rare and heterogeneous diseases with dismal outcome when treated with chemotherapy alone. Because allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (allo-SCT) can cure relapse/refractory patients, we hypothesized that upfront allo-SCT may provide a better outcome. Therefore, all patients that presented with advanced PTCL in our institution at diagnosis were scheduled to undergo upfront allo-SCT after induction chemotherapy.Patients and methodsThe aim of the present work was to assess the feasibility and toxicity of upfront allo-SCT. From 2004 to 2012, 49 newly diagnosed PTCL patients were scheduled to receive upfront allo-SCT. A human leukocyte antigen-matched donor was found for 42 patients: related to the patient in 15 cases, unrelated in 20 cases, and suitable cord blood units were used in 7 cases.ResultsAfter induction chemotherapy, 17 patients reached complete remission and 29 (60%) proceeded to upfront allo-SCT. For all patients, the 1 and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 59% [95% confidence interval (CI) 47–75] and 55% (95% CI 43–71), respectively. The most frequent reason we did not proceed to allo-SCT was disease progression or insufficient response after induction. For transplanted patients, the 1- and 2-year OS were 76% (95% CI 62–93) and 72.5% (95% CI 58–91), respectively. Toxicity-related mortality (TRM) 1 year after allo-SCT was only 8.2% (95% CI 0–18.5). The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate of patients who did not proceed to allo-SCT (n = 20) was below 30%. The disease status at the time of transplantation was a strong predictive marker for both PFS and OS in transplant patients.ConclusionsUpfront allo-SCT in PTCLs is feasible with low TRM, and it provides long-term disease control. However, one-third of patients remain chemo-refractory and, thus, new therapeutic approaches are warranted. The role of upfront allo-SCT compared with other therapeutic approaches in PTCLs requires investigation in randomized studies.     

Incidence and risk of hemorrhagic events with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: an up-to-date meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials

BackgroundWe aimed at determining the overall incidence and risk of hemorrhagic events associated with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs).MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases for relevant prospective, randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the summary incidence, relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by using either random-effects or fixed-effects models according to the heterogeneity of included studies.ResultsThe overall incidence of all-grade and high-grade hemorrhagic events was 9.1% (95% CI: 6.8–12.1%) and 1.3% (95% CI 0.8% to 2.1%), respectively. And the use of VEGFR-TKIs was associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic events, with a relative risk (RR) of 1.67 (95% CI 1.19–2.33, P = 0.003), but not for high-grade hemorrhagic events (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.86–1.77, P = 0.25). The risk of developing all-grade hemorrhagic events varied significantly with tumor types (P < 0.001) and different VEGFR-TKIs (P < 0.001). Additionally, the most common causes of all-grade hemorrhagic events were hemoptysis (48.6%) and epistaxis (20.7%), while hemoptysis (41.8%) and CNS hemorrhage (13.4%) was the most common cause of high-grade hemorrhagic events.ConclusionsWhile the use of VEGFR-TKIs is associated with a significantly increased risk of developing hemorrhagic events in cancer patients, this is primarily for lower grade events.     

The number of extranodal sites assessed by PET/CT scan is a powerful predictor of CNS relapse for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: An international multicenter study of 1532 patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy

PurposeDevelopment of secondary central nervous system involvement (SCNS) in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is associated with poor outcomes. The CNS International Prognostic Index (CNS-IPI) has been proposed for identifying patients at greatest risk, but the optimal model is unknown.MethodsWe retrospectively analysed patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma diagnosed between 2001 and 2013, staged with PET/CT and treated with R-CHOP(-like) regimens. Baseline clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments, and outcome data were collected from clinical databases and medical files. We evaluated the association between candidate prognostic factors and modelled different risk models for predicting SCNS.ResultsOf 1532 patients, 62 (4%) subsequently developed SCNS. By multivariate analysis, disease stage III/IV, elevated serum LDH, kidney/adrenal and uterine/testicular involvement were independently associated with SCNS. There was a strong correlation between absolute number of extranodal sites and risk of SCNS; the 144 patients (9%) with >2 extranodal sites had a 3-year cumulative incidence of SCNS of 15.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] 9.2–21.2%) compared with 2.6% (95% CI 1.7–3.5) among those with ≤2 sites (P < 0.001). The 3-year cumulative risks of SCNS for CNS-IPI defined risk groups were 11.2%, 3.1% and 0.4% for high-, intermediate- and low-risk patients, respectively. All risk models analysed had high negative predictive values, but only modest positive predictive values.ConclusionsPatients with >2 extranodal sites or high-risk disease according to the CNS-IPI should be considered for baseline CNS staging. Clinical risk prediction models suffer from limited positive predictive ability, highlighting the need for more sensitive biomarkers to identify patients at highest risk of this devastating complication.     

Prognostic impact and implications of extracapsular lymph node involvement in colorectal cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BackgroundThe extranodal extension (ENE) of nodal metastasis (i.e. the extension of tumor cells through the nodal capsule into the perinodal adipose tissue) has recently emerged as an important prognostic factor in different types of malignancies. However, the tumor–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system for colorectal cancer does not consider it as a prognostic parameter. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the prognostic role of ENE in patients with lymph node-positive colorectal cancer.Materials and methodsTwo independent authors searched PubMed and SCOPUS until 7 January 2015 without language restrictions. Prospective studies reporting data on prognostic parameters in subjects with colorectal cancer, comparing participants with the presence of ENE (ENE+) versus only intranodal extension (ENE-) were eligible. Data were summarized using risk ratios (RRs) for the number of deaths/recurrences and hazard ratios (HRs) together with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for time-dependent risk related to ENE+, adjusted for potential confounders.ResultsThirteen studies including 1336 patients were identified with a median follow-up of 4.7 years. ENE was associated with a higher T stage and tumor grading. In addition, ENE was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality (RR = 1.75; 95% CI 1.42–2.16, P < 0.0001, I² = 60%; HR = 1.69, 95% CI 1.32–2.17, P < 0.0001, I² = 46%) and of recurrence of disease (RR = 2.07, 95% CI 1.65–2.61, P < 0.0001, I² = 47%; HR = 2.31, 95% CI 1.54–3.44, P < 0.0001, I² = 48%).ConclusionsBased of these results, in colorectal cancer, ENE should be considered from the gross sampling to the pathology report, as well as in future oncologic staging systems.     

Clinical usefulness of PI3K/Akt/mTOR genotyping in companion with other clinical variables in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with everolimus in the second and subsequent lines

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to search for predictive and prognostic factors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with everolimus among the components of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.Patients and methodsIn a prospective, one-arm, phase II study, patients with mRCC received everolimus (10 mg/day) using a 30-day cycle. A prospectively planned evaluation of potential biomarkers of PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.ResultsThe median age of the 58 patients enrolled into the study was 60 years (range 41–78 years). In multivariate analysis, it was found that the adverse independent predictors for everolimus therapy were histological grade G1/2 {hazard ratio (HR): 2.68 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29–5.58, P = 0.0082]}, increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level before treatment [HR: 2.55 (95% CI 1.30–4.99, P = 0.0064)] and the PIK3CA gene variant rs6443624 (HR: AC + AA versus CC = 2.08, 95% CI 1 11–3.89, P = 0.0254). In multivariate analysis, it was observed that the adverse independent prognostic factors were: elevated corrected calcium level [HR: 4.17 (95% CI 1.66–10.51; P = 0.0024)] and the PIK3CA gene variant rs6443624 [HR: AC + AA versus CC = 1.97 (95% CI 1.02–3.79; P = 0.0421)].ConclusionsThe PI3KCA gene polymorphism, LDH, and histologic grade can predict the effects of everolimus treatment. The corrected calcium level and the PIK3CA gene variant rs6443624 may be independent prognostic factors. Further investigation is needed to confirm and validate these findings prospectively in other RCC trials.     

Treatment of Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma in Community Settings

BackgroundPeripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCLs) represent a rare and heterogeneous group of malignancies that do not have consensus treatment recommendations. Strategies extrapolated from B-cell lymphoma have met with limited efficacy, although T-cell–specific salvage therapies have been recently developed.MethodsTo determine treatment patterns and associated outcomes in PTCL not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS), anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma (ALCL), and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), a retrospective analysis was undertaken at a large US community oncology network among patients treated between January 2010 and April 2015.ResultsAmong 93 patients (44 PTCL-NOS, 30 ALCL, 19 AITL), 23 unique treatments were used in 66 first-line patients and 12 unique second-line treatments were used in 24 relapsed/refractory patients. First-line CHOP and CHOP-like regimens were used in 74% of patients, providing 4-year overall survival (OS) outcomes of 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14%-83%) in patients without transplant consolidation (82% in ALCL, 37% in PTCL-NOS, and 0% in AITL). Upfront stem cell transplantation trended toward improved 4-year progression-free survival 77% (95% CI, 54%-100%) versus 34% (95% CI, 14%-80%); (P = .08; hazard ratio [HR] 0.29) with 4-year OS 77% (95% CI, 54%-100%) versus 34% (P = .22; HR 0.41). Brentuximab was the most common second-line therapy, with multiple additional regimens used in sequence (up to 5 salvage regimens) in many.ConclusionsThe significant variability in treatments used for PTCL emphasizes the lack of consensus therapy in this rarer lymphoma and calls for additional organized prospective and registry studies to evaluate comparative effectiveness.     

Defining prognosis for women with breast cancer and CNS metastases by HER2 status

BackgroundThe purpose of this retrospective study was to determine, in a cohort of patients with breast cancer and central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the effect of trastuzumab in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease and to compare this with that of patients with HER2-negative disease.MethodsFive hundred and ninety-eight patients with invasive breast cancer, CNS metastases and known HER2 status were identified. Time to CNS metastases and survival after CNS metastases were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox models were fitted to determine the association between HER2 status, trastuzumab treatment and outcomes after adjustment for other patient characteristics.ResultsIn the multivariable model, patients with HER2-negative disease [Hazard ratio (HR) 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15–1.95, P = 0.003] and patients with HER2-positive disease who did not receive trastuzumab (HR 2.13, 95% CI 1.51–3.00, P < 0.0001) had shorter times to CNS metastases compared with patients with HER2-positive disease who had received trastuzumab as first-line therapy for metastases. Furthermore, patients with HER2-negative disease (HR 1.66, 95% CI 1.31–2.12, P < 0.0001) and patients with HER2-positive disease who had never received trastuzumab (HR 1.34, 95% CI 0.78–2.30, P = 0.28) had an increased hazard of death compared with patients with HER2-positive disease who had received trastuzumab before or at the time of CNS metastases diagnosis.ConclusionIn our cohort of patients with breast cancer and CNS metastases, patients with HER2-positive disease treated with trastuzumab had longer times to development of and better survival from CNS metastases compared with patients with HER2-positive disease who had never received trastuzumab and patients with HER2-negative breast cancer.     

Incidence and risk of central nervous system metastases as site of first recurrence in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant trastuzumab

BackgroundCentral nervous system (CNS) disease as the site of first relapse after exposure to adjuvant trastuzumab has been reported. We carried out comprehensive meta-analysis to determine the risk of CNS metastases as the first site of recurrence in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who received adjuvant trastuzumab.MethodsEligible studies include randomized trials of adjuvant trastuzumab administered for 1 year to patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who reported CNS metastases as first site of disease recurrence. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate the incidence, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using fixed-effects inverse variance and random-effects models.ResultsA total of 9020 patients were included. The incidence of CNS metastases as first site of disease recurrence in HER2-positive patients receiving adjuvant trastuzumab was 2.56% (95% CI 2.07% to 3.01%) compared with 1.94% (95% CI 1.54% to 2.38%) in HER2-positive patients who did not receive adjuvant trastuzumab. The RR of the CNS as first site of relapse in trastuzumab-treated patients was 1.35 (95% CI 1.02–1.78, P = 0.038) compared with control arms without trastuzumab therapy. The ratio of CNS metastases to total number of recurrence events was 16.94% (95% CI 10.85% to 24.07%) and 8.33% (95% CI 6.49% to 10.86%) for the trastuzumab-treated and control groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found based on trastuzumab schedule or median follow-up time. No evidence of publication bias was observed.ConclusionsAdjuvant trastuzumab is associated with a significant increased risk of CNS metastases as the site of first recurrence in HER2-positive breast cancer patients.     

Central Nervous System Efficacy of Furmonertinib (AST2818) Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment for EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Results From the FURLONG Study

IntroductionFurmonertinib (AST2818) is a pan-EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor with central nervous system (CNS) antitumor activity. We report the CNS efficacy of furmonertinib compared with gefitinib in untreated EGFR-sensitizing mutation-positive NSCLC from the FURLONG study.MethodsFURLONG was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study conducted in 55 hospitals in the People’s Republic of China. Patients 1:1 randomly received furmonertinib 80 mg once daily or gefitinib 250 mg once daily treatment. At screening, all the patients underwent brain imaging examination. Patients with asymptomatic steady CNS metastases at baseline constituted this preplanned CNS subgroup analysis.ResultsA total of 358 patients were enrolled in the FURLONG study. In the 133 (37%) patients who had measurable or nonmeasurable CNS lesions, CNS progression-free survival was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.2–25.3) in the furmonertinib group and 9.8 months (95% CI: 7.2–18.0) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio = 0.40 [95% CI: 0.23–0.71], p = 0.0011). In the 60 patients (17%) who had measurable CNS lesions, CNS objective response rate was 91% (95% CI: 72–99) with furmonertinib and 65% (95% CI: 48–80) with gefitinib (OR = 6.82 [95% CI: 1.23–37.67], p = 0.0277). The least-square mean of CNS depth of response was 62% (95% CI: 51–72) in the furmonertinib group and 39% (95% CI: 30–47) in the gefitinib group, the mean difference was 23% (95% CI: 10–37, p = 0.0011).ConclusionsFurmonertinib first-line treatment was found to have superior efficacy in CNS progression-free survival, CNS objective response rate, and CNS depth of response compared with gefitinib in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases.     

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas in a large US multicenter cohort: prognostication in the modern era including impact of frontline therapy

BackgroundOptimal frontline therapy for peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) in the modern era remains unclear.Patients and methodsWe examined patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes among 341 newly diagnosed PTCL patients from 2000 to 2011. Outcome was compared with a matched cohort of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients, and prognostic factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses.ResultsPTCL subtypes included PTCL, not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) (31%), anaplastic large T-cell lymphoma (ALCL) (26%), angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (23%), NK/T-cell lymphoma (7%), acute T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (6%), and other (7%). Median age was 62 years (range 18-95 years), and 74% had stage III-IV disease. Twenty-three (7%) patients received only palliative care whereas 318 received chemotherapy: CHOP-like regimens (70%), hyperCVAD/MA (6%), or other (18%). Thirty-three patients (10%) underwent stem-cell transplantation (SCT) in first remission. The overall response rate was 73% (61% complete); 24% had primary refractory disease. With 39-month median follow-up, 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 32% and 52%. PFS and OS for PTCL patients were significantly inferior to matched patients with DLBCL. On multivariate analysis, stage I–II disease was the only significant pretreatment prognostic factor [PFS: hazard ratio (HR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34–0.85, P = 0.007; OS: HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.22–0.78, P = 0.006]. ALK positivity in ALCL was prognostic on univariate analysis, but lost significance on multivariate analysis. The most dominant prognostic factor was response to initial therapy (complete response versus other), including adjustment for stage and SCT [PFS: HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.14–0.28, P < 0.0001; OS: HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.17–0.40, P < 0.0001]. No overall survival difference was observed based on choice of upfront regimen or SCT in first remission.ConclusionsThis analysis identifies early-stage disease and initial treatment response as dominant prognostic factors in PTCL. No clear benefit was observed for patients undergoing consolidative SCT. Novel therapeutic approaches for PTCL are critically needed.     

Association of plasma concentrations of branched-chain amino acids with risk of colorectal adenoma in a large Japanese population

BackgroundAvailable evidence from animal studies suggests that branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs) may have a protective effect against colorectal carcinogenesis. However, a possible effect of BCAAs against colorectal neoplasia has not been evaluated in humans. Here, we aimed to evaluate whether plasma concentrations of BCAA are associated with the risk of colorectal adenoma (CRA), a precursor lesion of colorectal cancer.Patients and methodsCRA cases and controls were identified from examinees who underwent total colonoscopy as part of a cancer screening program between 2004 and 2005 and responded to self-administered dietary and lifestyle questionnaires. We measured plasma concentrations of leucine, isoleucine and valine in 629 patients with adenoma and 584 controls. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the association between BCAA and CRA risk after adjustment for potential confounders.ResultsHigh plasma concentrations of leucine, valine and total BCAA were inversely associated with CRA risk after adjustment of potential confounders. The multivariate-adjusted ORs for the highest versus lowest quartiles were 0.60 (95% CI 0.42–0.87,P_trend = 0.006) for leucine, 0.68 (95% CI 0.48–0.97,P_trend = 0.09) for valine and 0.68 (95% CI 0.48–0.98,P_trend = 0.10) for total BCAA. Further analysis by gender revealed that this inverse association was clearly evident in men, but not in women: the corresponding OR for leucine, valine and total BCAA was 0.50 (95% CI 0.32–0.80,P_trend = 0.003), 0.60 (95% CI 0.38–0.95,P_trend = 0.01) and 0.58 (95% CI 0.37–0.93,P_trend = 0.04), respectively, in men and 0.78 (95% CI 0.42–1.45,P_trend = 0.44), 0.77 (95% CI 0.41–1.43,P_trend = 0.85) and 0.84 (95% CI 0.45–1.57,P_trend = 0.81), respectively, in women.ConclusionOur finding suggests that BCAAs may have a beneficial influence against the process of colorectal carcinogenesis, at least in the early stage. The mechanisms underlying this potential association between BCAA and colorectal carcinogenesis warrant further investigation.     

Alectinib versus chemotherapy in crizotinib-pretreated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: results from the phase III ALUR study

BackgroundThis is the first trial to directly compare efficacy and safety of alectinib versus standard chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, crizotinib.Patients and methodsALUR (MO29750; NCT02604342) was a randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial of alectinib versus chemotherapy in advanced/metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and crizotinib. Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive alectinib 600 mg twice daily or chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m² or docetaxel 75 mg/m², both every 3 weeks) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. Primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsAltogether, 107 patients were randomized (alectinib, n = 72; chemotherapy, n = 35) in 13 countries across Europe and Asia. Median investigator-assessed PFS was 9.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.9–12.2] with alectinib and 1.4 months (95% CI: 1.3–1.6) with chemotherapy [hazard ratio (HR) 0.15 (95% CI: 0.08–0.29); P < 0.001]. Independent Review Committee-assessed PFS was also significantly longer with alectinib [HR 0.32 (95% CI: 0.17–0.59); median PFS was 7.1 months (95% CI: 6.3–10.8) with alectinib and 1.6 months (95% CI: 1.3–4.1) with chemotherapy]. In patients with measurable baseline central nervous system (CNS) disease (alectinib, n = 24; chemotherapy, n = 16), CNS objective response rate was significantly higher with alectinib (54.2%) versus chemotherapy (0%; P < 0.001). Grade ≥3 adverse events were more common with chemotherapy (41.2%) than alectinib (27.1%). Incidence of AEs leading to study-drug discontinuation was lower with alectinib (5.7%) than chemotherapy (8.8%), despite alectinib treatment duration being longer (20.1 weeks versus 6.0 weeks).ConclusionAlectinib significantly improved systemic and CNS efficacy versus chemotherapy for crizotinib-pretreated ALK-positive NSCLC patients, with a favorable safety profile.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02604342; Roche study MO29750     

A novel pretherapeutic gene expression-based risk score for treatment guidance in gastric cancer

BackgroundPerioperative chemotherapy is an established treatment of advanced gastric cancer patients. Treatment selection is based on clinical staging (cT). We aimed to establish and validate a prognostic score including clinical and molecular factors, to optimize treatment decisions for these patients.Patients and methodsWe analyzed 626 carcinomas of the stomach and of the gastro-esophageal junction from two academic centers including primarily resected and pre-/perioperatively treated patients. Patients were divided into a training (N = 269) and validation (N = 357) set. Expression of 11 target genes was measured by quantitative PCR in resected tumors. A risk score to predict overall survival (OS) was generated and validated. Intra-tumoral heterogeneity was assessed by analyzing 50 tumor areas from 10 patients.ResultsA risk score including the expression of CCL5, CTNNB1, EXOSC3 and LZTR1 and the clinical parameters cT, tumor localization and histopathologic type suggested two groups with a significant difference in OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17–0.52]. The risk score was successfully validated in an independent cohort (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.21–0.51; P < 0.001) as well as in subgroups of primarily resected (HR 0.30; 95% CI 0.17–0.54; P < 0.001) and pre-/perioperatively treated patients (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17–0.81; P = 0.009). A significant difference in OS of high- and low-risk patients was also found in primarily resected patients with intestinal (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.23–0.90; P = 0.020) and nonintestinal-type carcinomas (HR 0.1; 95% CI 0.02–0.42; P < 0.001). Intra-tumor heterogeneity analysis indicated a classification reliability of 95% for a supposed analysis of three biopsies.ConclusionThe identified risk score could substantially contribute to an improved management of gastric cancer patients in the context of perioperative chemotherapy.     

Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in nonsmall-cell lung cancer: new insights into the effect on failure type via a multistate approach

BackgroundAdjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy has become the standard therapy against resected nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of variable results on its late effect, we reanalyze the long-term data of the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial (IALT) to describe in details the role of adjuvant chemotherapy.Patients and methodsIn the IALT, 1867 patients were randomized between adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and control, who were followed up for a median of 7.5 years. Of these, 1687 patients were enrolled from 132 centers accepting to report the times to cancer events. We used event history methodology to estimate the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on the risks of local relapse, distant metastasis, and death.ResultsAdjuvant chemotherapy was highly effective against local relapses [HR = 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60–0.90; P = 0.003] and nonbrain metastases (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.66–0.94; P = 0.008) but not against brain metastases (HR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.82–1.4; P = 0.61). The effect on noncancer mortality was nonsignificant during the first 5 years (HR = 1.1; 95% CI 0.81–1.5; P = 0.29), whereas the risk of noncancer mortality was subsequently higher with treatment (HR = 3.6; 95% CI 2.2–5.9; P < 0.001). This harmful effect, however, potentially concerned only about 2% of the patients at 8 years.ConclusionAdjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy reduced the risk of local relapse and of nonbrain metastasis, thereby improving survival. This treatment exerted no residual effect on mortality during the first 5 years, but a higher risk of noncancer mortality was found thereafter. Detailed long-term follow-up is strongly recommended for all patients in randomized trials evaluating adjuvant treatments in NSCLC.     

Alectinib versus crizotinib in treatment-naive anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer: CNS efficacy results from the ALEX study

BackgroundThe phase III ALEX study in patients with treatment-naive advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) met its primary end point of improved progression-free survival (PFS) with alectinib versus crizotinib. Here, we present detailed central nervous system (CNS) efficacy data from ALEX.Patients and methodsOverall, 303 patients aged ≥18 years underwent 1:1 randomization to receive twice-daily doses of alectinib 600 mg or crizotinib 250 mg. Brain imaging was conducted in all patients at baseline and every subsequent 8 weeks. End points (analyzed by subgroup: patients with/without baseline CNS metastases; patients with/without prior radiotherapy) included PFS, CNS objective response rate (ORR), and time to CNS progression.ResultsIn total, 122 patients had Independent Review Committee-assessed baseline CNS metastases (alectinib,n = 64; crizotinib,n = 58), 43 had measurable lesions (alectinib,n = 21; crizotinib,n = 22), and 46 had received prior radiotherapy (alectinib,n = 25; crizotinib,n = 21). Investigator-assessed PFS with alectinib was consistent between patients with baseline CNS metastases [hazard ratio (HR) 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.25–0.64] and those without (HR 0.51, 95% CI: 0.33–0.80,P interaction = 0.36). Similar results were seen in patients regardless of prior radiotherapy. Time to CNS progression was significantly longer with alectinib versus crizotinib and comparable between patients with and without baseline CNS metastases (P < 0.0001). CNS ORR was 85.7% with alectinib versus 71.4% with crizotinib in patients who received prior radiotherapy and 78.6% versus 40.0%, respectively, in those who had not.ConclusionAlectinib demonstrated superior CNS activity and significantly delayed CNS progression versus crizotinib in patients with previously untreated, advancedALK+ NSCLC, irrespective of prior CNS disease or radiotherapy.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02075840     

The SENECA study: Prognostic role of serum biomarkers in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BackgroundAging induces meaningful changes in the immune system and inflammation response with increase in monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Aim of this study was to explore the prognostic role of MLR and LDH levels in older patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of a consecutive cohort of 168 older (>70 years) patients with mCRC. The prognostic impact of MLR and LDH levels on overall survival (OS) was investigated through uni-and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Moreover, we categorized patients into three groups according to MLR and LDH levels (group 1: MLR-low and LDH-low; group 2: MLR-high or LDH-high; group 3: MLR-high and LDH-high).ResultsBy univariate analysis, high LDH level (HR 1.74, 95% CI 1.05–2.90) and high MLR level (HR 2.19, 95% CI 1.48–3.44) were significantly associated with a worse OS. Conversely, primary tumor resection and left-sidedness were significantly associated with a longer OS. By multivariate analysis, high LDH level (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.13–3.55) and high MLR level (HR 2.99, 95% CI 1.68–5.33) were independent prognostic factors of worse prognosis. Compared to group 1, a shorter survival was reported for patients included in group 2 (HR 1.97, 95% CI 1.21–3.23 in univariate; HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.43–4.51 in multivariate) or in group 3 (HR 2.42, 95% CI 24–4.74, p = .010 in univariate; HR 5.59, 95% CI 2.15-14.54 in multivariate)ConclusionsHigh baseline levels of LDH, MLR or both are independent unfavorable prognostic factors in older patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for mCRC.