Concomitant boost radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin in advanced head and neck cancers: a phase II trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To determine the safety and efficacy of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT) with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CT) in advanced head and neck cancers. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between February 2000 and June 2001, 95 previously untreated patients of advanced head and neck cancers were treated with CBRT and concurrent cisplatin CT. CBRT consisted of: phase I--44 Gy/22fx/4.5 weeks, phase IIa--16 Gy/8fx/1.5 weeks and phase IIb--10 Gy/8fx (delivered as a second daily fraction after a gap of 6h along with phase IIa). CT (cisplatin 35 mg/m(2)) was administered weekly usually preceding CBRT by an hour. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 39 months (range 8-50 months). CBRT compliance (70 Gy in 40-44 days) was seen in 66% (63/95). Six cycles of CT was delivered in 73% (69/95). Acute grade III/IV mucosal toxicity was seen in 79% and resulted, on average, in a total weight loss of 7.9 kg from a mean pretreatment weight of 51 kg. Nasogastric tube placements were required in 26% (25/95) for an average duration of 19.3 days. Grade III leucopenia was seen in 2%. Mortality during and within 30 days of treatment was seen in 14% (13/95). Crude incidence of late subcutaneous fibrosis (grade III) was 21% (12/57) and a case of mandibular necrosis and thyroid cartilage necrosis each were seen. Initial loco regional disease clearance was seen in 59% (56/95) and the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 3-year loco-regional control rate and overall survival were 25% (median 7 months, 95% C.I. 3-11) and 27% (median 12 months, 95% C.I. 8-16), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: On present evidence, in the settings of a developing country, CBRT with concurrent cisplatin cannot be recommended as primary therapy in advanced head and neck cancers without formal comparison with other treatment modalities.     

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy using low-dose weekly gemcitabine versus low-dose weekly paclitaxel in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a phase III study

The objective of this study was to compare concomitant chemoradiotherapy based on weekly low-dose gemcitabine versus weekly low-dose paclitaxel in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Previously, untreated patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were randomly assigned to one of the two concomitant chemoradiation regimens: (1) weekly gemcitabine at a dose of 100 mg/m² over 30 min 1–2 h before radiotherapy and (2) weekly paclitaxal at a dose of 20 mg/m² over 60 min 4–6 h before radiotherapy. The planned radiotherapy dose was 65 Gy over 6.5 weeks in 32 settings. Two hundred and sixteen patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: group A (110 patients) and group B (106 patients) who received concomitant weekly low-dose gemcitabine and low-dose paclitaxal, respectively, with the radiotherapy protocol. The hematological toxicity was generally mild. On the contrary, non-hematologic toxicities were severe. Grade III mucositis occurred in 36% in group A and in 24% in group B (P = 0.04). Moreover, grade III dermatitis were encountered in 24% in group A and 13% in group B (P = 0.049). Thirty-two (29%) of group A and 18(17%) of group B patients required enteral or parenteral feeding (P = 0.01). Sixteen (15%) of group A and 6 (6%) of group B required enteral or parenteral feeding that lasted for 6 months (P = 0.03). Regarding the late effect on swallowing, 8% of patients in group A and 2% of patients in group B required enteral or parenteral feeding for more than 6 months (P = 0.035). Response rates were 78 and 89% in groups A and B, respectively (P = 0.038). The 2-year progression-free survival figures were 54 and 64% of groups A and B, respectively; however, the 2-year overall survival figures were 56 and 67%, respectively. On the other hand, the 3-year progression-free survival figures were 39 and 48% for groups A and B, respectively, while the 3-year overall survival figures were 45 and 49%, respectively (P = 0.05). Both concomitant chemoradiotherapy regimens were easily given in the outpatient clinic. The regimen based on paclitaxel was significantly more tolerable and effective; however, the difference was not enormous.     

Concomitant adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with weekly low-dose cisplatin for high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II prospective trial

Aims

Several randomised trials have tested adjuvant regimens using concomitant high-dose cisplatin and radiotherapy to improve outcome in high-risk locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer (HNSCC), showing a substantial increase in locoregional control and disease-free survival, despite a higher and eventually detrimental toxicity profile. The aim of the present phase II single-stage prospective study was to investigate whether a weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy regimen might be able to improve patients’ compliance compared with standard-dose cisplatin with similar outcome results.

Materials and methods

Between January 2004 and November 2008, 54 patients with high-risk locally advanced HNSCC were enrolled on to this phase II trial. Patient characteristics were: median age 59.7 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1 in 72% of patients and stage IV disease in 82%, extracapsular nodal spread in 67% and positive/close surgical margins in 37%. Patients received cisplatin (30 mg/m²) once a week for 7-8 weeks concurrent with external beam radiotherapy delivered with a median dose of 66.6 Gy (1.8 Gy each day; five fractions/week) on the primary site and 50 Gy (2 Gy each day) for the lower neck.

Results

Major acute toxicity of the combined treatment, defined as grade 3-4 mucositis, was observed in 35.2% of patients. No fatal complications occurred, with 81.5% of patients completing the planned regimen. Late reactions were mild (total 16% with a grade 3 dysphagia rate of 12%). The locoregional control rate was 82%; 5 year overall and disease-free survival were 63 and 62%, respectively.

Conclusions

Concomitant adjuvant chemoradiotherapy with weekly cisplatin seems to be a feasible and well-tolerated therapeutic approach in ‘unfit’ patients. Clinical results seem to be at least comparable with those previously reported. However, to draw any definitive conclusion, large confirmatory phase III randomised trials are demanded.     

Combined postoperative radiotherapy and weekly cisplatin infusion for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: preliminary report of a randomized trial

A prospective clinical trial was designed to evaluate efficacy, toxicity, and patient compliance of concomitant postoperative radiotherapy and Cisplatin infusion in patients with Stage III or IV S.C.C. of the head and neck and histological evidence of extra-capsular spread of tumor in lymph node metastase(s). Cisplatin 50 mg IV with forced hydration was given or not every week (i.e., 7 to 9 cycles) concurrently with radiotherapy. Between 1984 and 1988, 83 patients were randomized: 44 were treated by irradiation without chemotherapy (RT group) and 39 by the combined modality (CM group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of patient characteristics, primary sites, tumor differentiation, T.N. stages, or postoperative prognostic factors. All patients completed the planned radiotherapy. There were seven severe toxicities (greater than grade 3) in the RT group. In the CM group, 30 severe toxicities occurred in 16/39 (41%) patients but none was life-threatening. Seven of 39 (18%) patients received less than two-thirds of the scheduled Cisplatin courses because of intolerance, mainly nausea and vomiting. Preliminary results show a better disease-free survival for the CM group (65% at 24 months) than for the RT group (41% at 24 months). This significant difference is largely due to increased loco-regional control in the CM group (79% vs 59%), the actuarial distant metastasis rates in patients controlled above the clavicles not being statistically different in the two groups.     

Adjuvant therapy with cetuximab for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx: results from a randomized,phase II prospective trial

BackgroundCetuximab combined with radiotherapy (RT) is a treatment option for head and neck cancer. The objectives of this randomized, phase II trial were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab maintenance therapy following definitive RT with concomitant cetuximab in patients with oropharyngeal cancer.Patients and methodsNinety-one patients with stage III–IV M0 oropharyngeal tumors were randomly assigned to the treatment with accelerated concomitant boost RT (69.9 Gy) + cetuximab or the same treatment with the addition of 12 consecutive weeks of cetuximab maintenance therapy. The primary end point was locoregional control (LRC) at 1 year.ResultsLRC at 1 year was superior among patients in the experimental arm, treated with cetuximab maintenance (59% versus 47%). However, LRC was similar between both arms after 2 years of follow-up, as a result of increased locoregional recurrences after the first year in the maintenance group. Patients treated with adjuvant cetuximab do recover very soon from toxic effect after combined treatment.ConclusionsTwelve weeks of cetuximab maintenance therapy after concomitant cetuximab + RT in locally advanced oropharyngeal carcinoma is feasible and improves clinical outcomes measured at 1 year. This improvement is not maintained after the second year suggesting that epidermal growth factor receptor blockade is not sufficient to completely eliminate the minimal residual disease.     

Docetaxel and cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy versus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy in treatment for locally advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a randomized clinical study

This randomized clinical study was to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of two chemoradiotherapy (cisplatin?+?5-fluorouracil?+?radiotherapy and cisplatin?+?docetaxel?+?radiotherapy) regimens in patients with unresectable local advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Previously untreated patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma were randomly assigned into two groups (each had 45 patients): cisplatin?+?5-fluorouracil?+?radiotherapy (PF) group and cisplatin?+?docetaxel?+?radiotherapy (DP) group. All patients received radiotherapy of 50.4?Gy (28 fractions of 1.8?Gy) over 5?weeks (5 fractions a week). Chemotherapy for PF group comprises 5-fluorouracil at days 1?C4 (250?mg/m²/day) and cisplatin (75?mg/m²) at day 1 of every 28-day cycle; full treatment course included 4 cycles. Chemotherapy for DP group comprises docetaxel (75?mg/m²) and cisplatin (75?mg/m²) at day 1 of every 28-day cycle; full treatment course included 4?cycles. Response, survival, progression and toxicity of both regimens were studied. Overall response rate (ORR) was 53.3?% for PF group and 73.3?% for DP group. Median overall survival (OS) time was 22.3?months for PF group and 43.2 group months for DP: Patients of DP group had a significant longer overall median survival time (P?<?0.05). Toxicity was acceptable; patients of PF group and patients of DP group did not showed significant difference in serious haematological event incidence (24.4 vs. 35.6?%, P?>?0.05). ORR and OS favour DP over PF in the treatment of patients with unresectable local advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.     

Concomitant boost radiotherapy schedules in the treatment of carcinoma of the oropharynx and nasopharynx

Concomitant boost schedules are characterized by delivering the boost (10-12 fractions) as second daily treatments during rather than following the basic wide field irradiations. This results in shortening the overall time to administer 69-72 Gy from 7 1/2-8 weeks to 6 weeks, which we hoped would improve the tumor control rate by reducing the opportunity for tumor clonogens to regenerate during treatment. From August 1985 to August 1988, 79 patients with T2-4 carcinomas of the oropharynx (72 patients) or nasopharynx (7 patients) were treated according to 1 of the 3 variants of the concomitant boost technique. The median age of patients was 60 years (range: 19-84 years) and the male-to-female ratio was 2.6. The overall 2-year actuarial primary and nodal control rates by radiotherapy alone were 74% and 76%, respectively. The ultimate 2-year control rates after surgical salvage were 82% and 84%, respectively. If the boost given during the last 2-2 1/2 weeks of basic treatment, a slightly better primary control rate (p = 0.11) resulted than if the boost was delivered during the first 2-2 1/2 weeks or twice a week throughout the basic treatment. The 2-year actuarial primary control rate of the 13 patients receiving induction chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy was significantly lower than that of patients treated with radiation only (81% vs 34%, p = 0.01), but this could be partly attributed to a more advanced stage in the chemotherapy group. The acute mucosal reactions were, as expected, more severe than those observed with conventional fractionation. Fifty patients developed confluent mucositis covering more than half of the boost area. Such reactions lasted for more than 6 weeks in seven patients. Late complications, however, so far observed, have been few. Three patients experienced chronic mucosal tenderness, 1 chronic mucosal ulceration, 2 transient bone exposure, and 1 carotid rupture following salvage surgery. The results so far appear to be better than the outcome of conventional radiotherapy. Its real value will be determined in a prospective randomized study.     

Paclitaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and radiotherapy in the management of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase II trial.

Aim of the present study was to test, activity and toxicity of a rapidly alternating chemoradiation (paclitaxel based) in 31 patients with unresectable, locally advanced or recurrent after surgery, head and neck cancer. Three-year overall survival and progression-free survival were 61.4 and 73.7%, respectively. Main side effects remain a major problem.     

Alternating chemoradiotherapy versus partly accelerated radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results from a phase III randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The authors previously have found that in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN), alternating chemoradiotherapy (ALT) was superior to low-total-dose conventional radiotherapy alone. The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the same chemoradiotherapy approach with high-total-dose partly accelerated radiotherapy. METHODS: During 6 years, 136 consecutive patients with previously untreated unfavorable Stage II or Stage III-IV (International Union Against Cancer) SCC of the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to chemotherapy consisting of 4 cycles of intravenous cisplatin (20 mg/m(2) of body surface area per day for 5 consecutive days) and 5-fluorouracil (200 mg/m(2) per day for 5 consecutive days; weeks 1, 4, 7, and 10) alternated with three 2-week courses of radiotherapy (20 grays [Gy] per course, 2 Gy per day, 5 days per week; ALT, 70 patients) or to partly accelerated radiotherapy with final concomitant boost technique (75 Gy/40 fractions in 6 weeks; partly accelerated radiotherapy [PA-RT], 66 patients). RESULTS: At the median follow-up of 60 months (range, 30-102 months), no statistical differences were observed in overall survival, progression free survival, or locoregional control between the 2 treatments. Actuarial 3-year overall survival and progression free survival were 37% and 35%, respectively, in the ALT group and 29% and 27%, respectively, in PA-RT group. The median overall survival and progression free survival were 24 and 15 months, respectively, in the ALT arm and 18 and 11 months, respectively, in PA-RT arm. Actuarial 3-year locoregional control rates were 32% in the ALT group and 27% in the PA-RT group. At multivariate analysis, tumor classification was the only factor that emerged as a significant independent variable affecting overall survival. Patients treated in the PA-RT arm experienced higher Grade 3+ (World Health Organization) acute skin and mucosal reactions than patients in the ALT arm. Moreover, local late mucosal and skin toxicities occurred more often in patients treated with PA-RT. CONCLUSIONS: This trial failed to disclose statistically significant differences in the outcome of patients treated with either ALT or PA-RT. Therefore, definitive conclusions could not be made. However, acute skin effects and late mucosal and skin toxicities above the clavicles appeared to be significantly lower with chemoradiotherapy.     

Concomitant chemoradiation versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical carcinoma: results from two consecutive phase II studies.

BACKGROUND: Randomized studies comparing induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection with radiation alone found that the neoadjuvant approach produces better results. So far, this latter modality has not been compared with standard concomitant chemoradiation. The objective of this report was to compare the results of two consecutive phase II studies: neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery or chemoradiation for the unresectable cases versus standard cisplatin-based chemoradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From February 1999 to July 1999, 41 patients with cervical carcinoma, stages IB2-IIIB, were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of three 21-day courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8, followed by either surgery or concomitant chemoradiation for the non-operable cases. From August 1999 to December 1999, an equal number of patients having comparable clinicopathological characteristics were treated with six weekly courses of cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) during standard pelvic radiation. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were analyzed. Both groups were similar with regard to age, histology, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, tumor size, pretreatment hemoglobin levels, parametrial infiltration and performance status. In the neoadjuvant arm the overall response rate to induction chemotherapy was 95% (95% confidence interval 88% to 100%). Twenty-three patients had surgery and 14 underwent chemoradiation. In the definitive chemoradiation study, 38 patients completed treatment, the median number of cisplatin courses was six for a dose intensity of 33 mg/m(2)/week. Doses to points A and B were 85 Gy (range 68-95) and 55 Gy (range 51-65), respectively. Chemoradiation was delivered in 44.6 (range 28-113) days. Complete response rates after all treatment were similar: 97% and 87% in the neoadjuvant and chemoradiation groups, respectively. At a median follow-up of 28 (range 2-33) and 24 (range 3-30) months, respectively, there were no differences in overall survival. To date, 15 and 13 patients in the neoadjuvant and chemoradiation groups, respectively, have died of disease (P = 0.8567). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this non-randomized comparison suggest that induction chemotherapy followed by surgery or chemoradiation is at least as effective in terms of response and survival as standard cisplatin-based chemoradiation. A randomized study is needed to confirm these findings.     

High-dose versus low-dose cisplatin in advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma: a randomized study

From November 1981 to February 1983, 64 patients with advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma were randomly treated with either high-dose (120 mg/m2) or low-dose (60 mg/m2) cisplatin. Of the 62 eligible patients, 59 were evaluable: the response rate observed in patients receiving high-dose and low-dose cisplatin was 16.1% and 17.8%, respectively. Survival was superimposable in the two treatment arms. No evidence of dose dependency of cisplatin activity in advanced head and neck squamous carcinoma was noted in this randomized trial.     

Sorafenib plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin versus sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: randomized phase II trial

BackgroundSorafenib (Sor) is acknowledged as a standard therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This trial was conducted to evaluate the effect of addition of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin (SorCDDP) to Sor for the treatment of advanced HCC.Patients and methodsWe conducted a multicenter open-labeled randomized phase II trial in chemo-naïve patients with advanced HCC with Child-Pugh scores of 5–7. Eligible patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive SorCDDP (sorafenib: 400 mg bid; cisplatin: 65 mg/m², day 1, every 4–6 weeks) or Sor (400 mg bid). The primary end point was overall survival.ResultsA total of 108 patients were randomized (Sor, n = 42; SorCDDP, n = 66). The median survival in the Sor and SorCDDP arms were 8.7 and 10.6 months, respectively [stratified hazard ratio (95% confidence interval), 0.60 (0.38–0.96), P = 0.031]. The median time to progression and the response rate were, respectively, 2.8 months and 7.3% in the Sor arm and 3.1 months and 21.7% in the SorCDDP arm. The adverse events were more frequent in the SorCDDP arm than in the Sor arm, but well-tolerated.ConclusionSorCDDP yielded favorable overall survival when compared with Sor in patients with advanced HCC.Clinical Trial registrationUMIN-CTR (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index-j.htm), identification number: UMIN000005703.     

Concomitant chemoradiation using gemcitabine in locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Objective  

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is among the most common and rapidly increasing cancers in Pakistan. There is currently no standard management for advanced HCC. There is currently no standard management for advanced HCC. The aim of the study was to assess response rate and toxicity of concomitant gemcitabine and external radiation therapy (ERT) in locally advanced HCC.     

Concomitant weekly cisplatin and altered fractionation radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND:

Both concomitant chemotherapy and altered fractionation radiotherapy (RT) have been shown to improve outcomes for patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. However, both strategies also increase acute toxicity, and it is questionable whether the 2 can be safely combined. Traditional concomitant chemotherapy regimens include high‐dose cisplatin given at 100 mg/m² every 3 weeks. The authors' purpose was to report efficacy and toxicity after weekly cisplatin (30 mg/m²/wk) concurrent with altered fractionation RT.

METHODS:

One hundred twenty‐one patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages II (3%), III (13%), or IV (84%) squamous cell carcinomas of the oropharynx (70%), hypopharynx (20%), or larynx (10%) were treated between 2000 and 2006 at the University of Florida with hyperfractionated RT (55 patients) or concomitant boost RT (66 patients) and concomitant cisplatin (30 mg/m²/wk).

RESULTS:

Median follow‐up was 2.9 years; median follow‐up on survivors was 3.6 years. Seventy‐nine percent of patients completed ≥6 cycles of chemotherapy; 94% received ≥7200 centigrays. Seven (6%) patients changed from cisplatin to carboplatin because of bone marrow toxicity. Gastrostomy tube feeding was required in 54% of patients either before (16%) or during RT (38%). Two (1.6%) patients died from therapy‐related complications. The 5‐year outcomes were: local control, 83%; locoregional control, 79%; distant metastasis‐free survival, 88%; cause‐specific survival, 76%; and overall survival, 59%. Seven (6%) patients had severe late complications. Three (3%) patients required a permanent gastrostomy tube.

CONCLUSIONS:

Concomitant weekly cisplatin with altered fractionation RT is a safe and effective treatment regimen. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

A phase II randomized trial of gemcitabine-docetaxel versus gemcitabine-cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

Purpose  To test efficacy and tolerability of non-platinum regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods  Chemonaive patients with measurable stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin (GC), or gemcitabine and docetaxel (GD), maximumsix cycles in a phase IIB trial. Results  A total of 108 patients were randomized. Response rates (GC vs. GD, respectively): complete 3.6/2.0%, Partial 30.9/38.0%. Median Overall Survival (OS): 8.9 months in both groups (P = 0.53); and median time to progression (TTP): 6.2/5.5 months respectively (P = 0.61). Toxicities included (GC vs. GD, respectively): grade 3–4 neutropenia 49.1/41.2%; grade 3 thrombocytopenia 30.9/3.9%; grade 3 anemia 14.5/3.9%. Non-haematological toxicity was similar, except for nausea and vomiting, (16.3/2%); renal toxicity (3.7/0%) and hepatic toxicity (5.6/12.7%). Conclusions  With a higher overall response rate and lower toxicity, GD is a good first treatment option for advanced NSCLC.     

Concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy in a conventional and modified fractionation schedule in locally advanced head and neck cancer: a randomised phase II EORTC trial

A randomised phase II trial was initiated to explore the feasibility of concomitant cisplatin and radiotherapy with conventional fractionation (CF) or multiple fractions per day (MFD) for patients with locally advanced head and neck malignancies. The MFD schedule was designed to achieve higher tumour concentrations of cisplatin at the time of irradiation by reducing the number of radiation treatment weeks from 7 to 3, allowing recovery from side-effects of both irradiation and cystostatic drugs during the rest periods, while keeping the same total dose and overall treatment time. Patients were randomised between a conventional fractionation scheme (CF) of 70 Gy in 7 weeks with 2 Gy per fraction with a daily dose of 6 mg/m(2) cisplatin and a modified fractionation scheme (MFD) delivering three fractions of 1.6 Gy per day, in weeks 1, 4 and 7, keeping the same overall treatment time and total dose. In the modified treatment regime, a daily dose of 10 mg/m(2) cisplatin was administered. 53 patients were entered in this trial and radiotherapy was given according to the schedule to all patients in both treatment arms. Cisplatin was given during the whole course of radiotherapy to only one quarter of the patients in the CF arm, stopping mostly after 5-6 weeks due to bone marrow depression and kidney toxicity, while patients in the MFD arm received it according to schedule. No difference was observed in acute and late toxicity in both treatment arms, while a similar or even better tumour response was obtained with MFD. A 67% higher daily dose of cisplatin concomitant with irradiation could be given in a 3-week multiple fractionation per day schedule, as opposed to the cisplatin given in the conventional daily fractionation schedule of 7 weeks with the same total radiation dose. Similar acute and late toxicities were seen in both treatment arms.