Validation of the new venous severity scoring system in varicose vein surgery

OBJECTIVES: We performed this observational study to validate the three components of a new venous severity scoring (VSS) system, ie, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), venous segmental disease score (VSDS), and venous disability score (VDS), and to evaluate VCSS, VDS, and CEAP clinical class and score in quantifying outcome of varicose vein surgery.Patients and methods The study included 45 patients who underwent superficial venous surgery in 48 legs with primary varicose veins. Venous color duplex scanning, clinical examination, and a questionnaire were used preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively to assign VSS and CEAP clinical class and score. RESULTS: CEAP clinical score, VCSS, and VDS demonstrated a linear association with CEAP clinical class (P <.001, P <.001, P =.002, respectively). Good correlation among all severity scores was found, particularly between CEAP clinical score and VCSS (r = 0.94; P <.001). CEAP clinical score was also highly correlated with CEAP clinical class (r = 0.84; P <.001) and VDS (r = 0.70; P <.001). Similarly, VCSS correlated with CEAP clinical class (r = 0.83; P <.001) and also VDS (r = 0.72; P <.001). The anatomic severity marker VSDS demonstrated a weak correlation with clinical severity indicators VCSS (r = 0.29; P =.048) and VDS (r = 0.31; P =.03) but not with age, gender, or CEAP clinical class and score. Six months after surgery the median (interquartile range) percent change in VCSS (73%; range, 50%-100%) and CEAP clinical score (70%; range, 50%-100%) were both significantly greater (P <.001) than the corresponding change in CEAP clinical class (17%; range, 0%-50%). In legs with high VDS at baseline, median (interquartile range) percent change in VDS was 100% (range, 50%-100%), significantly greater (P <.001) than the corresponding change in CEAP clinical class (0%; range, 0%-17%). CONCLUSIONS: Venous severity scores are significantly higher in advanced venous disease, demonstrating correlation with anatomic extent. Both venous clinical severity scores, VCSS and CEAP clinical score, are equally sensitive and significantly better for measuring changes in response to superficial venous surgery than is the already in use CEAP clinical class. VDS demonstrated comparable and even better performance. Although the assignment of CEAP clinical class might be adequate for daily clinical purposes, venous severity scoring systems should be used in clinical studies to quantify venous outcome.     

Clinical presentation and venous severity scoring of patients with extended deep axial venous reflux

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and profile of patients presenting with chronic venous insufficiency (class C3-C6) and cascading deep venous reflux involving femoral, popliteal, and crural veins to the ankle. METHODS: From September 2001 to April 2004, 2,894 patients were referred to our center for possible venous disorders. The superficial, deep, and perforator veins of both legs were investigated with color duplex scanning. The criterion for inclusion in this study was the existence of cascading deep venous reflux involving the femoral, popliteal, and crural veins to the ankle whose duration had to be longer than 1 second for the femoropopliteal vein and longer than 0.5 seconds for the crural vein. The advanced CEAP classification, the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), the Venous Segmental Disease Score (reflux; VSDS), and the Venous Disability Score (VDS) were used. RESULTS: Seventy-one limbs in 60 patients were identified. Eleven limbs (15.5%) were classified as C3, 36 (50.7%) as C4, 21 (29.6%) as C5, and 3 (4.2%) as C6. A primary etiology was identified in 11 (15.5%) limbs, and a postthrombotic etiology was identified in 60 limbs (84.5%). In the latter group, all but four patients were aware that they had had a previous deep venous thrombosis. In addition to femoropopliteal and calf veins, reflux was present in the common femoral vein in 60 (84.5%), the deep femoral vein in 27 (38%), and the muscular calf veins in 62 (87.3%). Incompetent perforator veins were identified in 53 (74.6%) limbs. Fifty-one (71.8%) limbs had a combination of superficial venous insufficiency (AS(2), AS(2,3), AS(4), or their combination) previously treated or present. Of these, 11 had primary etiology alone, and 40 had a secondary etiology with or without primary disease. Means and 95% confidence intervals of the VCSS, VSDS, and VDS were 9.72 (8.91-10.53), 7.2 (6.97-7.42), and 1.08 (0.83-1.32), respectively. A significant increase in the VCSS and in the VSDS (P < .0001) paralleled the CEAP clinical class. The VDS was higher in the C3 and C6 classes but did not reach significance. There was a significant link between the pain magnitude in the VCSS and the VDS (P < .0001). Severity of pain and high VDS did not depend on the wearing of elastic compression stockings. VCSS increased significantly according to the presence of an incompetent perforator vein (P < .05) and/or reflux in the deep femoral vein (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed the value of the Venous Severity Score as an instrument for evaluation of chronic venous insufficiency. A significant increase in the VCSS and VSDS paralleled CEAP clinical class; VDS was higher in classes C3 and C6 without reaching significance, probably because of the small size of the samples. Some clinical and anatomic features need to be clarified to facilitate scoring.     

Hemodynamic impairment, venous segmental disease, and clinical severity scoring in limbs with Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome

BACKGROUND: Klippel-Trenaunay syndrome (KTS) is a complex congenital anomaly featuring two or more of the following: (1) capillary malformations (port-wine stains), (2) soft tissue or bony hypertrophy (or both), and (3) varicose veins or venous malformations. With the purpose of determining the actual significance of venous impairment in patients with KTS, we quantified the venous valvular competency and calf muscle pump function and examined their effect on clinical severity. METHODS: Included were patients with near-normal function of affected limb(s) and minimal/small foot hypertrophy. Excluded were those with deep venous hypoplasia, aplasia or thrombosis, lymphedema, limb length discrepancy (>2.5 cm), peripheral arterial (ankle-brachial index <1.0), or cardiac disease and walking impairment. Venous duplex scanning, ascending venography, magnetic resonance imaging, strain gauge plethysmography, and a bone scanogram were performed. We studied eight men and seven women aged 15 to 51 years (median, 24 years). The KTS involved 17 limbs (unilateral in 13 patients and bilateral in 2). Contralateral limbs in patients with unilateral KTS acted as controls (n = 13). Venous clinical severity was graded according to the CEAP and venous clinical severity score (VCSS), and reflux complexity was classified according to the venous segmental disease score. Outflow obstruction (outflow fraction at 1 and 4 seconds; OF(1) and OF(4), respectively), reflux (venous filling index), calf muscle pump function (ejection fraction), and hypertension (residual volume fraction) were determined in both limbs with strain gauge plethysmography. Data, reported as median and interquartile range, were analyzed with the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Varicose veins or venous malformations occurred in the medial, posterior, or anterolateral limb segments of the ankle (7/17, 7/17, and 9/17), calf (10/17, 8/17, and 12/17), knee (9/17, 8/17, and 8/17), and thigh (10/17, 6/17, and 8/17, respectively). Venous malformations occupied the subcutaneous space (17/17) and extended into the subfascial space in 6 (35.3%) of 17 limbs. Abnormal reflux (>0.5 seconds) was distributed in the great (64.7%; 11/17) and small (5.9%; 1/17) saphenous veins and the common femoral (23.5%; 4/17), femoral (41.1%; 7/17), popliteal (29.4%; 5/17), perforator (70.6%; 12/17), and axial calf (35.3%; 6/17) veins. There was no difference in the OF(1) and OF(4) between the affected limbs and the controls. Limbs with KTS had a fivefold greater venous filling index (0.133-0.46 mL . 100 mL(-1) . s(-1); 0.258 mL . 100 mL(-1) . s(-1)) than the controls (0.034-0.055 mL . 100 mL(-1) . s(-1); 0.046 mL . 100 mL(-1) . s(-1); P < .0001), and this was linked to a higher venous segmental disease score (3 [2-4] vs 0 [0-1]; P < .0001). Limbs with KTS had half the ejection fraction (20.8%; 12.3%-24%) of the controls (39.3%; 30.9%-64.6%) and twice as high a residual venous fraction (77% [69.6%-84.5%] vs 40.9% [20.6%-60%]; both P < .004). Patients complained of swelling (100%; 15/15), aching (100%; 15/15), pain (93.3%; 14/15) and heaviness (100%; 15/15), tiredness (66.7%; 10/15), and tightness (33.3%; 5/15) of the limb(s) with KTS. Limbs with KTS had a worse (1) venous clinical severity by 11 VCSS points (11 [8-12] vs 0 [0-1]) and (2) clinical status by 3 CEAP classes (C3 [C3-C4] vs C0 [C0-C2]) than the control limbs (both P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Venous disease in limbs with KTS is a major source of morbidity in affected patients. Limbs with KTS are characterized by complex reflux patterns, severe valvular incompetence, calf muscle pump impairment, and venous hypertension, thus explaining the advanced clinical severity (VCSS) and CEAP grade.     

浅静脉剥脱术治疗合并深浅静脉反流的下肢静脉曲张

目的 探讨下肢浅静脉剥脱术对合并深、浅静脉反流的静脉曲张的疗效.方法 2004年1月至2006年12月选取合并深浅静脉反流患者20例共22条下肢,以单纯浅静脉反流患者22例共27条下肢为对照,采用传统静脉剥脱手术方法治疗.以静脉临床严重程度评分(venous clinical severity score,VCSS)临床评分体系以及彩色多普勒超声检查观察二组术前以及术后2年临床症状改善以及深静脉反流程度的变化.结果 深浅静脉反流组和单纯浅静脉反流组术前VCSS分别为(7.1±2.9)分和(6.6±2.0)分,差异无统计学意义(P=0.44).术后两组VCSS分别为(2.3±1.2)分和(1.8±0.8)分,差异无统计学意义(P=0.13).随访两年各组手术前后VCSS评分差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),2年后超声检查深浅静脉反流组中深静脉反流程度无改变肢体11条,改善7条,加重4条,单纯浅静脉反流组4个肢体出现深静脉反流.结论 浅静脉剥脱术可改善合并深静脉反流患者的临床症状,对深静脉反流总体无影响.     

��֫�����������Խڶ����������Ӱ���ǰհ���о�

目的探讨下肢浅静脉剥脱术后病人深静脉反流程度的变化。方法 2007年1月至2009年1月承德医学院附属医院血管外科收治下肢静脉曲张合并有节段性深静脉反流的病人46例,对其共48条下肢采用传统手术治疗,超声观察下肢深静脉反流程度,应用临床表现严重程度评分(VCSS)评估临床症状的改善情况。结果 42例病人随访2年,术后2年VCSS为1.95±1.78,低于术前(6.33±1.78),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。2年后超声检查深静脉反流程度无改变肢体22条,改善14条,加重6条,手术前后深静脉反流程度差异无统计学意义。不同CEAP分级的反流程度的改善差异无统计学意义(P=0.359)。结论浅静脉剥脱术后能改善伴有深静脉反流病人的临床症状,对部分病人可改善深静脉反流程度,改善程度与CEAP分级不相关。     

C-reactive protein and red cell aggregation correlate with late venous function after acute deep venous thrombosis

OBJECTIVE: Risk factors leading to development and subsequent progression of chronic venous insufficiency after acute deep venous thrombosis (DVT) are only partially identified. Inflammation and rheologic abnormalities might have a causative role. The purpose of this study was to investigate C-reactive protein (CRP), D -dimer, and blood rheologic parameters in patients after acute DVT in relation to clinical outcome. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients with a history of acute proved DVT underwent clinical examination and duplex ultrasound scanning of the veins, and Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Venous Segmental Disease Score (VSDS) were calculated. Further, CRP, D -dimer, and several rheologic parameters were determined and related to outcome as assessed with venous scores. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were examined 28 (median) months after the index event. Patients had higher CRP ( P < .001), D -dimer ( P < .001), red blood cell aggregation ( P < .01), fibrinogen concentration ( P < .01), and leukocyte count ( P < .05) than did healthy control subjects. CRP and red blood cell aggregation were positively correlated with VCSS ( r = 0.42 and P < .01, and r = 0.30 and P < 0.05, respectively). Multivariate regression analysis showed that the relation between CRP and VCSS was independent of other laboratory and rheologic parameters and of age, total thrombus load, duration of compression therapy after the index event, recurrence, recanalization, and presence of comorbid conditions ( P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: CRP is independently related to the severity of venous dysfunction in patients after acute DVT. Chronic inflammation as well as changes in blood rheologic parameters may be causally involved in the development of chronic venous insufficiency occurring in the medium-term and long-term course after acute DVT.     

Performance characteristics of the venous clinical severity score

OBJECTIVE: To facilitate study of the natural history and management of venous disease, a 10-component venous clinical severity (VCS) score has been proposed as an objective measure of disease severity. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of this instrument. METHODS: VCS component scores (0 to 3) for pain, varicose veins, edema, pigmentation, inflammation, induration, stocking use, and ulcer size, duration, and number were measured in consecutive patients with chronic venous disease. Differences between observers (n = 3) and on serial evaluation by the same observer were determined. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-eight limbs in 64 patients were evaluated. Mean VCS score increased from CEAP class 0 (1.7 +/- 1.8) to class 6 (14.7 +/- 3.0; R =.84; P <.0001). Scores in 68 limbs evaluated twice by the same observer differed by a mean of only 0.8 (P =.15), with a reliability coefficient of 0.6. Mean scores of 8.0 (+/- 5.1), 7.2 (+/- 5.1), and 8.0 (+/- 5.4) were obtained in 63 limbs evaluated by all three investigators (P =.02). Only the component scores for pain, inflammation, and pigmentation showed significant (P <.05) interobserver variability. Interobserver agreement on the absence of disease or presence of severe disease as defined by scores of 3 or less or 8 or more was good (kappa = 0.59 and 0.65, respectively). CONCLUSION: The VCS score is a critically needed tool for evaluating changes in venous disease over time. The score is reliable and shows good correlation with CEAP clinical classification.     

Results and significance of colour duplex assessment of the deep venous system in recurrent varicose veins.

OBJECTIVES: To establish the status of the deep veins in patients presenting with recurrent varicose veins and the effect on treatment decisions. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Duplex examination of 570 consecutive patients (843 limbs) presenting with recurrent varicose veins (CEAP C2-4). RESULTS: Approximately one third of these patients (34.8%:294 limbs) had no deep venous abnormality; 173 limbs with superficial vein abnormalities only had great and/or small saphenous junction incompetence, the remaining 121 legs had abnormal perforating or communicating veins. Deep venous abnormalities were found in 549 limbs with evidence of persisting deep venous obstruction in only 20. Deep venous incompetence was found in 529 limbs (62.7% of all legs). However three segment incompetence (common femoral, femoral and popliteal veins) was found in only 181 legs (21.4%), two segment incompetence in 137 (16.2%) and one segment incompetence in 211 (25%). CONCLUSIONS: Deep vein incompetence is common in patients with recurrent varicose veins. Deep venous obstruction is an infrequent finding but total deep venous reflux (three segment incompetence) affects just under one quarter of all limbs with recurrent varicose veins. Ablation or surgery of varicose veins in this group may be less effective. Patients should be advised of the implications of this finding.     

��֫ԭ���Ծ��������Լ������ۺ����������

目的：探讨下肢原发性静脉返流性疾病的综合外科治疗效果,方法：从1996年2月至2000年9月,对患者肢原发性静脉返流性疾病的108例126条肢体进行了综合性外科手术治疗,所有肢体均行浅静脉手术,83例97条肢体在浅静脉手术同时行股静脉瓣外修复成形成,22例26条同时行股静脉瓣膜外修成形术＋腔镜筋膜下交通静脉结扎术（SEPS）,3例3条同时行SEPS。结果：80．2％（１０１／１２６）的患肢静脉性跛行,酸胀,疼痛等症状消失,１９．８％（２５／１２６）的患肢状明显改善,所有肢体静脉曲线消失,行浅和深静脉系统手术的肢体中有１０条合并溃疡,术后３－６个月,有８条溃疡愈合,２条明显缩小,在浅或（和）深静脉手术基础上加作ＳＥＰＳ的２３例２６条肢体的静脉性溃疡,有２４条术后１４－３2d愈合,２条也明显缩小,全组经彩超复查８９．７％的肢体深静脉瓣膜功能恢复正常,结论：对重度下肢原发性静脉返流性疾病人的浅静脉,深静脉和交通静脉三个系统的疾病变同时综合性的给予外科治疗,可大大提高临床疗效。     

Venous claudication in iliofemoral thrombosis: long-term effects on venous hemodynamics, clinical status, and quality of life

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the long-term impact of iliofemoral thrombosis (I-FDVT) on walking capacity, venous hemodynamic status, CEAP class, venous clinical severity, and quality of life, and determined the prevalence of venous claudication. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with prior I-FDVT, assessed at our institution since 1990, were called for follow-up. Those with walking impairment due to arterial disease (ABI < 1.0 postexercise) or unrelated causes and those thrombectomized or thrombolyzed were excluded; 39 patients (22-83 years, median 46 years) were included. Median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-23 years). Investigation included classification in CEAP and Venous Clinical Severity Scoring (VCSS) systems, air-plethysmography (outflow fraction [OF], venous filling index [VFI], residual volume fraction [RVF]) and venous duplex, treadmill (3.5 km/h, 10%) to determine initial (ICD) and absolute (ACD) claudication distances, and quality of life assessment (SF-36). Nonaffected limbs of patients with unilateral I-FDVT (37 of 39) comprised the control group. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. RESULTS: A total of 81% of limbs with I-FDVT had superficial and deep reflux and 19% superficial reflux; reflux in control limbs was 29.7% (P < 0.001) and 27% (P > 0.2), respectively; 43.6% (17 of 39; 95% CI, 27-60%) of patients developed venous claudication ipsilateral to I-FDVT (ICD: 130 m, range 105-268 m), compelling 15.4% (6 of 39; 95% CI, 3.5-27%) to discontinue treadmill (ACD: 241 m, range 137-298 m). Limbs with prior I-FDVT had a lower OF (37%, range 32.2-43%; P < 0.001), abnormally higher VFI (3.8 mL/s, range 2.5-5.7 mL/s; P < 0.001), and RVF (45%, range 32.5-51.5%; P = 0.006), and clinical impairment in CEAP and VCSS systems (P < 0.0001). Patients with I-FDVT had impaired physical functioning (P = 0.02) and role (P = 0.033), general health (P = 0.001), social function (P = 0.047), and mental health (P = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: A total of 43.6% of those with prior I-FDVT developed venous claudication compelling interruption of walking in 15.4%. Prior I-FDVT caused outflow impairment and a large residual venous volume and reflux, resulting in marked clinical and quality of life compromise. Standardized challenge enabled discrimination of those with clinically relevant impairment.     

Comparative Study of Outcome of Duplex Ultrasound-Guided,Catheter-Directed Foam Sclerotherapy and Radio-frequency Ablation in the Management of Great Saphenous Varicose Veins

Chronic venous insufficiency of lower limbs is a common problem in adults. We compared the two modalities, namely duplex ultrasound-guided, catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy (UGFS) and radio-frequency ablation (RFA), in the management of great saphenous varicose veins using clinical assessment (Venous Clinical Severity Score, Venous Disability Score) and duplex imaging. Patients presenting with great saphenous vein (GSV) varicosity due to incompetent saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) were selected and randomly assigned in each arm, i.e., duplex UGFS group and RFA group. Patients were assessed on days 7, 30, and 90 both clinically and sonologically. Clinical assessment was based on the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Venous Disability Score (VDS). Obliteration of the treated GSV segment was noted in all the limbs of the RFA group (31/31) on duplex sonography on days 7, 30, and 90, while in the UGFS group, out of 30 limbs, obliteration was successful in 28 (28/30) and 2 had treatment failure. However, outcome of both the groups were statistically comparable (P value?>?0.05). After the procedure, improvement in the VCSS was noted in both the study arms in every follow-up and both the modalities were found to be equally effective. Improvement in the Venous Disability Score was there on every follow-up, but maximum improvement was seen on the second visit, i.e., post-treatment day 30. Improvement was statistically significant and equal in both arms after the initial 1 week. Foam sclerotherapy, especially catheter-directed, is as effective as radio-frequency ablation in achieving anatomical obliteration and yielding relief in clinical signs and symptoms in patients with GSV varicosity with SFJ incompetence.     

Clinical Presentation and Patterns of Venous Reflux in Thai Patients with Chronic Venous Insufficiency (CVI)

ObjectiveTo study the extent of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in Thai patients by assessing venous clinical severity scores (VCSSs), venous disability scores (VDSs) and prevalence of lower limb venous reflux in a cohort of patients attending a vascular surgery clinic.DesignProspective comparative cohort study.MaterialAll patients presenting with CVI (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy and Pathophysiology (CEAP) C4–6) in our vascular surgery clinic between October 2006 and December 2008 were enrolled and compared with the same number of control patients.MethodA standardised interview was conducted to document each patient’s history of venous disease, VCSS and VDS. Duplex ultrasonography of selected superficial and deep veins was performed.ResultsThere were 41 patients, mean age 58 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.7. Of 58 limbs, 35%, 19% and 47% were of CEAP clinical stages C4, C5 and C6, respectively. Previous deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was reported by 7% and major leg trauma by 9% of patients. The mean VCSS was 9.7 and mean VDS was 1.0. VDS 2 or 3 were found in 10% of patients. The VCSS 2 and 3 for pain, oedema and inflammation were found in 22%, 26% and 0% of C6 legs. The prevalence of combined superficial and deep vein reflux was 71%. The prevalence of isolated superficial and deep vein reflux were 8% and 17%, respectively. One patient had iliac vein occlusion. Compared with the control group, risk factors that were found to be significant were physical findings of varicose veins, history of leg trauma, standing posture and BMI.ConclusionsThai patients with CVI were relatively young. Visible varicose veins, pain, oedema and inflammation were uncommon and most patients could maintain their usual activities despite advanced venous disease. An association with obesity was not common. Despite a low prevalence of a history of previous DVT, the prevalence of deep vein reflux was high and commonly combined with superficial venous reflux.     

“一站式”治疗Cockett综合征合并下肢静脉曲张临床疗效

目的评估"一站式"方法(同期行髂静脉支架植入术和下肢静脉曲张术)治疗Cockett综合征合并下肢静脉曲张的安全性、有效性。方法对58例Cockett综合征合并下肢静脉曲张患者行"一站式"治疗,观察并记录术后并发症情况、有无静脉曲张复发,比较术前和术后门诊随访1、3、6、12个月时静脉临床严重程度评分(VCSS)、阿伯丁静脉曲张问卷(AVVQ)评分及髂静脉支架通畅率。结果对58例患者均成功施行"一站式"治疗,技术成功率100%。3例活动性溃疡患者术后1个月内溃疡完全愈合。术后无下肢深静脉血栓、肺栓塞等严重并发症发生。术后1、3、6、12个月VCSS和AVVQ评分较术前均明显降低(P均0.001);随访至12个月,髂静脉支架通畅率为100%,无下肢静脉曲张复发。结论 "一站式"方法治疗Cockett综合征合并下肢静脉曲张的安全性和有效性良好,短期髂静脉支架内通畅率满意,具有一定推广价值。     

Valvular incompetence in superficial, deep and perforator veins of limbs with varicose veins

Venous valvular incompetence was investigated with Doppler technique in 296 limbs with untreated primary varicose veins. Partial or complete insufficiency of the long saphenous vein was found in 95%. Six patterns of incompetence of this vein could be distinguished. Insufficiency of the short saphenous vein was present in 15% of the limbs and perforator incompetence in 45%. Femoral and/or popliteal vein reflux was found in 20% of the limbs. In eight limbs (2.7%) with verified primary deep venous insufficiency there was a moderate or severe degree of femoral and popliteal venous reflux. Skin changes secondary to the venous disease were present in 18% of the limbs, mainly those with incompetence of perforator and long saphenous veins. Doppler investigation of varicose limbs give valuable information and can be recommended as a standard pre-treatment test.     

射频消融术与大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术治疗下肢静脉曲张的疗效比较

背景与目的 大隐静脉高位结扎剥脱术（HSL）是治疗下肢静脉曲张的经典术式,但存在创伤较大、恢复时间较长、切口瘢痕不美观等缺点。随着医疗技术的进步,以腔内热消融治疗为代表的微创治疗技术蓬勃发展。本研究旨在对比射频消融术（RFA）与传统HSL治疗下肢静脉曲张的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析2021年5月—2022年6月期间因原发性下肢静脉曲张于首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院血管外科行手术治疗的272例患者（298条肢体）的临床与随访资料,其中96例（100条肢体）行RFA治疗（RFA组）,176例（198条肢体）行HSL治疗（HSL组）。比较两组患者的术前临床特征、手术情况、并发症情况、临床表现-病因学-解剖学-病理生理学（CEAP）分级、静脉临床严重程度评分（VCSS）和慢性静脉功能不全问卷-14问版（CIVIQ-14）评分的变化情况。结果 两组技术成功率均为100%,术后3 d复查超声提示大隐静脉主干缺如/闭合率为100%。共完成随访265例（290条肢体）,平均随访时间（13.2±3.8）个月,随访期间超声提示大隐静脉主干缺如/闭合率为100%。两组患者的基本临床特征无明显差异（均P>0.05）;与HSL组比较,RFA组术中出血量（21.3 mL vs. 46.8 mL）、术后第1天疼痛评分（3.1 vs. 3.3）、总并发症发生率（25.5% vs. 38.0%）及皮肤感觉异常发生率（5.1% vs. 24.0%）均明显降低（均P<0.05）,RFA组的深静脉血栓形成发生率升高（5.1% vs. 0,P<0.05）;术后所有患者CEAP分级均较术前降级,RFA组81.7%的患肢降级为C0~C1级,HSL组83.9%的患肢降级为C0~C1级;所有患者的VCSS和CIVIQ-14评分均较术前有所改善,且HSL组的VCSS评分改善程度大于RFA组（均P<0.05）。结论 RFA短期疗效与HSL相当,相对于HSL而言,创伤更小、疼痛感更轻、并发症发生率更低,是一种下肢静脉曲张的有效治疗方案。     

The effect of ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy of incompetent perforator veins on venous clinical severity and disability scores

PURPOSE: Current techniques to treat venous ulcerations and patients with severe lipodermatosclerosis include the elimination of incompetent perforator veins by open surgical ligation and division or by subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery. An alternative and less invasive means to obliterate perforator veins is ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy (UGS). We hypothesize that UGS is a clinically effective means of eliminating perforator veins and results in improvement of the clinical state (scores) without the complications associated with other more invasive methods. METHODS: Between January 2000 and March 2004, UGS was used to treat chronic venous insufficiency in 80 limbs of 68 patients. This was a clinical series of patients who had perforator incompetence and no previous surgery for venous disease < or = 2 years of their UGS procedure. Most had perforator disease without coexisting axial reflux of the saphenous or deep venous systems. Color flow duplex scanning was used to identify incompetent perforator veins in the calf, and duplex guidance was used to inject each perforator with the liquid sclerosant sodium morrhuate (5%). Patients were restudied by duplex scanning up to 5 years after treatment. Clinical results were determined by Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) and Venous Disability Score (VDS) before and after treatment. RESULTS: Of the 80 limbs treated with UGS, 98% of incompetent perforators were successfully obliterated at the time of treatment, and 75% of limbs showed persistent occlusion of perforators and remained clinically improved with a mean follow-up of 20.1 months. According to the CEAP classification, there were 46.2% with limb ulceration or C6, 1.2% C5, 28.7% C4, 17.5% C3, and 6.2% C2 with pain isolated to the site of the perforator(s). Of those who returned for follow-up, the VCSSs changed from a median of 8 before treatment (95% confidence interval [CI], 3 to 15) to a median of 2 after treatment (95% CI, 0 to 7) (P < .01). Likewise, VDSs dropped from a median of 4 before treatment (95% CI, 1 to 3) to 1 after treatment (95% CI, 0 to 2) (P < .01). There were no cases of deep vein thrombosis involving the deep vein adjacent to the perforator injected. One patient had skin complications with skin necrosis. Perforator recurrence was found more frequently in those with ulcerations than those without. CONCLUSION: UGS is an effective and durable method of eliminating incompetent perforator veins and results in significant reduction of symptoms and signs as determined by venous clinical scores. As an alternative to open interruption or subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery, UGS may lead to fewer skin and wound healing complications. Perforator recurrence occurs particularly in those with ulcerations, and therefore, surveillance duplex scanning after UGS and repeat injections may be needed.     

Endovenous saphenous ablation corrects the hemodynamic abnormality in patients with CEAP clinical class 3-6 CVI due to superficial reflux

This investigation was designed to determine whether minimally invasive radiofrequency or laser ablation of the saphenous vein corrects the hemodynamic impact and clinical symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in CEAP clinical class 3-6 patients with superficial venous reflux. Patients with CEAP clinical class 3-6 CVI were evaluated with duplex ultrasound and air plethysmography (APG) to determine anatomic and hemodynamic venous abnormalities. Patients with an abnormal (>2 mL/second) venous filling index (VFI) and superficial venous reflux were included in this study. Saphenous ablation was performed utilizing radiofrequency (RF) or endovenous laser treatment (EVLT). Patients were reexamined within 3 months of ablation with duplex to determine anatomic success of the procedure, and with repeat APG to determine the degree of hemodynamic improvement. Venous clinical severity scores (VCSS) were determined before and after saphenous ablation. Eighty-nine limbs in 80 patients were treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (n = 58), or EVLT (n = 31). The average age of patients was 55 years and 66% were women. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics between the groups treated with RFA or EVLT. Postoperatively, 86% of limbs demonstrated near total closure of the saphenous vein to within 5 cm of the saphenofemoral junction. Eight percent remained open for 5-10 cm from the junction, and 6% demonstrated minimal or no saphenous ablation. The VFI improved significantly after ablation in both the RF and EVLT groups. Postablation, 78% of the 89 limbs were normal, with a VFI <2 mL/second, and 17% were moderately abnormal, between 2 and 4 mL/second. VCSS scores (11.5 +/-4.5 preablation) decreased significantly after ablation to 4.4 +/-2.3. Minimally invasive saphenous ablation, using either RFA or EVLT, corrects or significantly improved the hemodynamic abnormality and clinical symptoms associated with superficial venous reflux in more than 90% of cases. These techniques are useful for treatment of patients with more severe clinical classes of superficial CVI.     

Venous reflux and venous distensibility in varicose and healthy veins.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyse venous diameter changes and venous reflux parameters, assessed during a standardised Valsalva manoeuvre in healthy subjects and in patients with varicose veins. METHODS: Measurements were carried out in 444 vein segments, (96 legs of 48 healthy volunteers, 52 legs of 35 patients with varicose veins). The common femoral vein (CVF), the femoral vein (FV) and the great saphenous vein (GSV) were investigated. The parameters of reflux and the relative venous diameter change (VD diff %) were measured simultaneously during a standardised Valsalva manoeuvre. RESULTS: Venous diameter changes during Valsalva manoeuvre (VD diff) were significantly greater in the GSV and in the deep veins of varicose patients compared to healthy subjects. The median (Interquartile range) of VD max in the CFV was: 13.1 (3.5) mm and 11.2 (3.4) mm (p=0.0002, Mann-Whitney - U test), in the FV 7.8 (2.7) mm and 6.9 (2.0) mm (p=0.01, Mann-Whitney), in the GSV: 7.3 (3.7) mm and 4.2 (1.1) mm (p<0.0001, Mann-Whitney) for the varicose and healthy veins respectively. Good correlation was seen for the retrograde peak reflux velocity (PRV) and VD diff % in varicose veins (r=0.71 (0.57 - 0.81) p<0.0001, Mann-Whitney). CONCLUSION: Relative venous diameter--changes during a standardised Valsalva manoeuvre are significantly larger in the deep and superficial veins of varicose vein patients compared with healthy veins, the increased distensibility correlates with venous reflux parameters in varicose vein patients.     

Prospective randomised comparative study of visual foam sclerotherapy alone or in combination with ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy for treatment of superficial venous insufficiency: preliminary report

ObjectiveThe aim of the study is to compare ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS: injection of foam sclerosant under ultrasound guidance) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) combined with visual foam sclerotherapy (VFS: injection of foam sclerosant under visual control) for varicose tributary veins and VFS alone in the treatment of GSV reflux.Design and methodsA total of 133 limbs in 97 patients with GSV reflux were randomised to receive either VFS alone or VFS combined with UGFS. In both groups, 1% polidocanol foam was used. Assessments included duplex ultrasonography, evaluation of Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSS) and CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, and pathophysiologic) scores. Ultrasonographic inspection of the foam in the GSV was carried out during 5 min before compression was applied. The primary ‘end’ point of the study was obliteration of the GSV at 6 months.ResultsA total of 51 limbs in 48 patients were treated with UGFS + VFS and the remaining 52 limbs in 49 patients were treated with VFS alone. There were no significant inter-group differences in patient age, male: female ratio, height, weight, body mass index, CEAP clinical scores or VCSS. The GSV diameter was 6.0 ± 1.7 mm (median ± interquartile range) in the UGFS + VFS group and 5.7 ± 1.6 mm in the VFS group (p = 0.419). The mean injected volume of foam for varicose tributary veins was 4 ± 2 ml in the UGFS + VFS group and 6 ± 2 ml in the VFS group, a significantly higher amount of foam being used in the latter (p < 0.001). However, the mean total amount of foam was greater in limbs treated with UFGS + VFS than in those treated with VFS alone (p = 0.017). Ultrasonographic inspection revealed complete vasospasm of the GSV in 37 (72.5%) limbs in the UGFS + VFS group and 29 (55.8%) in the VFS group during sclerotherapy (p = 0.097). At 6-month follow-up, complete occlusion was found in 23 limbs (45.1%) treated with UGFS + VFS and in 22 limbs (42.3%) treated with VFS. The difference between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.775). Reflux was absent in 30 limbs (58.8%) treated with UGFS + VFS and in 37 (71.2%) treated with VFS (p = 0.190). There was no inter-group difference in post-treatment VCSS (p = 0.223).ConclusionsThese results show that UGFS + VFS and VFS are equally effective for the treatment of GSV reflux, despite the lower volume of foam used for VFS alone.     

Molecular mechanisms in chronic venous insufficiency

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is common. Its manifestations include varicose veins; skin changes such as dermatitis, hyperpigmentation, and lipodermatosclerosis; and chronic leg ulcers. Recent advances in the understanding of its pathophysiology have shown how molecular mechanisms in the inflammatory cascade are involved in these diverse findings. Venous hypertension and associated fluid shear stress alterations on the endothelial surface may initiate this cascade and may lead to adverse changes in the venous wall, venous valves, and skin that can eventually result in varicose veins and in venous ulcers.