Evolution toward dissection of an intramural hematoma of the ascending aorta

Intramural hematoma of the aorta is a condition increasingly observed in clinical practice. Uncertainty exists whether such lesions represent a different pathology or simply the precursors of classic dissecting aneurysm. The patient was a 76-year-old woman with intramural hematoma of the ascending aorta. Clinical course, progression of the lesion to type A aortic dissection, and surgical treatment are described. Although natural history of intramural hematoma of the ascending aorta is not clearly elucidated, the case presented confirms that the evolution toward intimal flap formation is possible and that we cannot foresee the stabilization of these lesions. We stress that intramural hematoma of the ascending aorta has to be managed as an aortic type A dissection and that aggressive treatment is advisable.     

Polymorphic presentation of an acute aortic syndrome

We describe a case of a patient with acute aortic syndrome referred to an emergent surgery. Aortic dissection presented with all-in-one imaging and pathologic entities: aortic dissection with intimal flap and true/false lumen, intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer. Usually, only one of these entities is present in a single patient, but it is possible that one entity evolve into or coexist with another. Extended hemiarch replacement was performed and the patient was discharged in a good condition.     

Intramural aortic abscess mimicking chronic aortic dissection

A 77-year-old patient was referred for progressive fatigue and dyspnea on exertion. Preoperative imaging evaluations including transthoracic echocardiography and computed tomography were suggestive of a chronic ascending aortic dissection with an intramural hematoma. Intraoperatively, the intramural structure was identified as an abscess cavity.     

Cardiac tamponade due to ruptured intramural hematoma of the ascending aorta: a case report

A 72-year-old man with a history of hypertension for 20 years was admitted with symptoms of acute aortic dissection. Computed tomography showed a crescentic thickening of the ascending aortic wall, suggesting an intramural hematoma. Sixteen hours after admission, he underwent urgent repair of the ascending aorta because of cardiac tamponade. We inspected the inside of the aorta from the aortic valve to the arch. Subadventitial hematoma due to hemorrhage from the outer media was confirmed. Rupture of the vasa vasorum was thought to be an initiating mechanism. The affected aortic wall was simply resutured and was not replaced with a graft because the intima was intact and the media was not dissected and the aortic wall was considered to be tolerable to normal blood pressure. The patient continues to do well 18 months following operation. An intramural hematoma of the ascending aorta should be regarded as a precursor of imminent rupture or classic dissection.     

Ascending aortic dissection without intimal tear: a case report

Aortic dissection may occur without the presence of intimal tear, and it may occur with medial dissection and intramural hematoma. We report a case in which mediastinal enlargement was found in the chest x-ray of a 79-year-old patient with chest and back pain that had started suddenly 1 week before. The patient had a decrease in hematocrit, and transthoracic echocardiography revealed around the heart pericardial fluid 5 cm thick. The ascending aorta could not be evaluated because of the presence of this fluid. The preoperative diagnosis, based on the computerized tomography findings (dissection of ascending aorta and pericardial fluid), was ruptured dissection of the ascending aorta. The patient underwent an emergency operation. Two liters of hemorrhagic fluid was aspirated from the pericardium during the operation. The ascending aorta was opened, but there was no intimal tear. Medial dissection and intramural hemorrhage were seen. The ascending aorta was replaced with a tube graft. Cases such as this, of medial dissection and intramural hematoma in which intimal integrity is preserved, should be approached in the same manner as classical dissections with intimal tear.     

Diagnosis and treatment of thoracic aortic intramural hematoma

Purpose: This report reviews our recent experience with nine patients who had intramural hematoma of the thoracic aorta.Methods: This was a retrospective study of all patients who had intramural hematoma at our institution from 1989 to 1994. Patients who had identifiable intimal flap, tear, or penetrating aortic ulcer were excluded from the study.Results: Among these nine elderly patients (mean age, 76 years), the most common presentation was chest or back pain. Intramural hematoma was diagnosed by a variety of high-resolution imaging techniques. The descending thoracic aorta alone was involved in seven patients, whereas the ascending aorta was affected in the other two patients. One patient had evidence of an aneurysm (5.0 cm diameter) in the region of the hematoma. All patients were initially managed nonsurgically with blood pressure control. Both patients who had ascending aortic involvement had progression of aortic hematoma, which resulted in death in one case and in successful surgery in the other. Six of the seven patients who had descending aortic involvement alone were successfully managed without aortic surgery. The patient who had intramural hematoma and associated aortic aneurysm, however, had severe, recurrent pain and underwent successful aortic replacement. Another patient had recurrent pain associated with hypertension, but was successfully managed nonsurgically with antihypertensive therapy. All eight survivors are doing well at a median follow-up of 19 months.Conclusions: Intramural hematoma appears to be a distinct entity, although overlap with aortic dissection or penetrating aortic ulcer exists. Aggressive control of blood pressure with intensive care unit monitoring has been our initial management. Patients who have involvement of the descending thoracic aorta alone can frequently be managed without surgery in the absence of coexisting aneurysmal dilatation or disease progression. Our experience suggests that a more aggressive approach with early surgery is warranted in patients who have ascending aortic involvement or those who have coexisting aneurysm and intramural hematoma. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24;1022-9.)     

A case of intraoperative acute aortic dissection caused by cannulation into an axillary artery.

Severe atherosclerotic disease of the ascending aorta is one of the risk factors of dissection of the ascending aorta and cerebral embolism during cardiac operations with cardiopulmonary bypass. Aortic dissection is rare, but once it happens, the mortality rate is high. For the patient with severely atherosclerotic or strongly calcified aorta, we should avoid cannulation into the aorta or clamping of it. In this case, we experienced aortic dissection although we chose the arterial cannulations into the axillary arteries because of the strong calcification of the ascending aorta and the abdominal aorta. The dissection was caused by the cannulation into the axillary artery. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) showed the dissection during the operation and the ascending aorta was replaced soon. Early diagnosis and treatment saved the patient. This case showed the following points: 1) cannulation into an axillary artery is not always safe; 2) TEE is very useful to detect the complicated dissection during operation; 3) replacement of the ascending aorta alone can be one of the choices for the treatment of aortic dissection caused by cannulation into an axillary artery.     

主动脉壁间血肿、穿透性粥样硬化性主动脉溃疡和主动脉夹层:影像学表现和发病机制进展

主动脉壁间血肿（AIH）、穿透性粥样硬化性主动脉溃疡（PAU）和主动脉夹层（AD）有相似的易患因素和临床表现,临床有时不易鉴别,但三者影像学表现和发病机制不同。本文对AIH、PAU和AD的影像学表现和发病机制进展进行综述。     

Acute aortic regurgitation due to aortic dissection confined to the sinus of Valsalva

A 34-year-old man with severe heart failure was diagnosed with acute aortic regurgitation (AR) by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). However, this differential diagnosis was incomplete. Only transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) revealed an intimal flap, leading to a diagnosis of Stanford type A aortic dissection. No abnormal findings were observed in the ascending aorta by contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT). Aortic dissection confined to the sinus of Valsalva has rarely been reported; however, TEE should still be considered for the differential diagnosis of acute AR, even if there is no evidence of dissection by TTE or contrast-enhanced CT.     

Acute dissection of the descending aorta: noncommunicating versus communicating forms

BACKGROUND: Noncommunicating dissecting intramural hematoma is an aortic dissection variant, characterized by absent flow within the false lumen. Noncommunicating dissecting intramural hematoma is thought to be more stable than communicating dissection when beginning in the descending aorta. This study assessed clinical characteristics, anatomic characteristics, and 1-year outcomes in acute descending noncommunicating dissecting intramural hematoma versus communicating dissection. METHODS: Retrospective database review identified patients who underwent magnetic resonance or computed tomography imaging revealing acute descending noncommunicating dissecting intramural hematoma or communicating dissection. Comparisons of clinical and anatomic characteristics and 1-year outcomes were performed. RESULTS: Twenty-four noncommunicating dissecting intramural hematoma and 36 communicating dissection cases were identified. Patients with noncommunicating dissecting intramural hematoma were older (68.5 +/- 8.8 versus 61.8 +/- 11.6 years; p < 0.05). Although noncommunicating dissecting intramural hematoma often showed abdominal aorta extension (50%), the infrarenal level was spared. Communicating dissection characteristically extended beyond the diaphragm (89%), including into the infrarenal aorta (28%). There was no significant difference in rates of adverse clinical events for noncommunicating dissecting intramural hematoma versus communicating dissection (13% versus 30%; 0.10 > p > 0.05). By follow-up imaging (87% of population), aortic deterioration was more frequent in noncommunicating dissecting intramural hematoma versus communicating dissection cases (60% versus 15%; p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Acute descending noncommunicating dissecting intramural hematoma and communicating dissection represent two variants, with differing clinical and anatomic characteristics, but comparable levels of 1-year morbidity.     

Intramural hematoma of the thoracic aorta in octogenarians: is non operation justified?

OBJECTIVE: The prognostic factors and treatment options for thoracic aortic intramural hematoma are controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine the most suitable treatment of this condition in very elderly patients. METHODS: In a review of the world literature, eight octogenarians with thoracic aortic intramural hematoma were found; to these the three cases reported here must be added. The descending thoracic aorta was involved in eight cases and the ascending/arch in three. RESULTS: In spite of patients' poor general conditions, the medical treatment group showed survival rates of 85.7% (descending) and 66.6% (ascending/arch), respectively. CONCLUSION: Extensive atherosclerotic changes of the aortic wall in the elderly, combined with control of hypertension, may probably prevent thoracic aortic intramural hematoma from progressing to dissection, with a favourable outcome. An earlier and more accurate preoperative diagnosis by modern diagnostic techniques, including spiral computed tomography (CT), as were performed in our own patients, will allow optimal treatment and increased patient survival.     

Aortic dissection without intimal rupture: diagnosis and management.

A 59-year-old man had symptoms of aortic dissection. Computed tomography and angiography showed a large intramural hematoma of the ascending and descending aorta without intimal defect or false lumen. The hematoma resolved completely within 7 weeks with medical treatment. His symptoms recurred 6 months later. Computed tomography and angiography demonstrated a type B dissection with a false lumen and an intimal defect. This case illustrated the progressive nature of aortic dissection without intimal rupture. The diagnostic criteria and therapeutic options are discussed.     

Aortic intramural hematoma with severe aortic regurgitation

A 71-year-old Japanese woman with severe chest pain was diagnosed with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. After 3 months of medical treatment, she was operated on under a diagnosis of dissecting aneurysm of the ascending aorta and severe aortic regurgitation. Operative findings showed prolapse, of the redundant aortic leaflets and a dilated ascending aorta without intimal tears. Operative and computed tomography findings differed from those of a classical dissection which was the primary diagnosis of this patient, and were compatible with a diagnosis of aortic intramural hematoma (IMH). Few reports of IMH include concomitant aortic regurgitation. Surgery involved aortic root remodeling and prosthetic graft replacement of the ascending aorta.     

Aortic intramural hematoma with severe aortic regurgitation.

A 71-year-old Japanese woman with severe chest pain was diagnosed with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection. After 3 months of medical treatment, she was operated on under a diagnosis of dissecting aneurysm of the ascending aorta and severe aortic regurgitation. Operative findings showed prolapse of the redundant aortic leaflets and a dilated ascending aorta without intimal tears. Operative and computed tomography findings differed from those of a classical dissection, which was the primary diagnosis of this patient, and were compatible with a diagnosis of aortic intramural hematoma (IMH). Few reports of IMH include concomitant aortic regurgitation. Surgery involved aortic root remodeling and prosthetic graft replacement of the ascending aorta.     

Acquired supravalvular aortic stenosis: a late complication of replacement of the ascending aorta.

Aortic syndromes are an increasing cause of morbidity and mortality. Ascending aortic dissection is a clinical emergency with most patients requiring open surgery to replace the ascending aorta. Detection through clinical suspicion, improved non-invasive imaging and refined surgical techniques have resulted in an improved survival rate. Acquired supravalvular aortic stenosis is an extremely rare complication of cardiac surgery. We present the case of a patient who, 15 years after undergoing elective replacement of the ascending aorta for aortic dissection, required repeat surgery for symptomatic supravalvular aortic stenosis. This case elegantly highlights the need for a detailed focused assessment in patients where the clinical presentation does not correlate with initial investigations. To our knowledge this is the first reported case of late symptomatic supravalvular aortic stenosis following replacement of the ascending aorta.     

Acute proximal aortic intramural hematoma: a case report

The case presented here is of a 72-year-old man with an acute proximal aortic hematoma. He was hospitalized and underwent close monitoring and blood pressure control. Typical aortic dissection developed during his hospital admission. This case emphasizes the importance of frequent follow-up imaging during medical therapy of patients with aortic intramural hematoma. However, the frequency of imaging is yet to be determined.     

Diagnosis and Therapeutic Consequences of Intramural Aortic Hematoma

The classical triad of sudden devastating chest pain, electrocardiographic absence of acute myocardial Infarction, and Identification of an upstream flap in the ascending aorta by transesophageal echocardlography (TEE) Indicates aortic type A dissection requiring emergent surgery. Among 34 patients presenting with clinical signs and symptoms of an aortic dissection, three did not show the mandatory flap in the upstream aorta. The only echocardlographic finding was aortic wall thickening Indicating an intramural hematoma. Two of these patients showed early aortic ectasia and one showed a pericardial effusion. Despite the missing flap echocardiographlcally, surgery was performed in all three patients. The surgical approach was the same as that for patients with a type A dissection. Two patients are doing well after the procedure, and one patient died after reoperation. The postoperatlve histologic work-up confirmed that there was no intimal tear or dissection of the intimal layer. We conclude that the echocardiographic finding of an Intramural hematoma combined with typical clinical signs of chest pain, with myocardial infarction ruled out, requires emergent surgical intervention. (J Card Surg 1994;9:508–515)     

Metachronous type III and type II acute aortic dissections in puerperium.

The case of a 30-year-old non-Marfan woman who developed a type III acute aortic dissection 5 days after delivery, followed within 16 h by an independent type II dissection, is reported. Preoperative CT scan imaging and TEE suggested metachronous type II and type III dissection. This was confirmed at surgery, where limited dissection of the aortic root without communication with the isthmic area via the aortic arch was evidenced. The patient underwent repair of the aortic root and adjacent ascending aorta and was medically treated for her type III dissection. This is the first report of metachronous acute aortic dissections in puerperium.     

Risikoevaluation der Aortendissektion Typ B

Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) is a modern term used to describe interrelated emergency aortic conditions with similar clinical characteristics and challenges including aortic dissection, intramural hematoma (IMH) and penetrating aortic ulcer (PAU). Population-based studies suggest that the incidence of aortic dissection ranges from 2.6 to 3.5 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year; hypertension and a variety of genetic disorders with altered connective tissue are the most prevalent risk conditions. In general, open surgical repair is recommended when dissection involves the ascending aorta, whereas medical management and endovascular stent graft repair is the best option when the ascending aorta is spared. Pathological conditions involving the aortic arch may be treated using a hybrid approach combining debranching of supra-aortic vessels and stent graft placement. Stent graft-induced remodeling of a dissected aorta seems to have long-term benefits in complicated and so-called uncomplicated type B dissections as almost every case reveals a risk profile and one in eight patients diagnosed with acute type B aortic dissection has either an IMH or a PAU. Pain is the most commonly presenting symptom of AAS and should prompt immediate attention including diagnostic imaging modalities, such as multislice computed tomography, transesophageal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. A specific therapeutic approach is necessary for IMH and PAU because without treatment they have a very poor outcome, are unpredictable in evolution and can be more severe than acute aortic dissection. All patients must receive the best medical treatment available at admission. High-risk but asymptomatic patients with IMH and PAU can probably be monitored without interventions. All symptomatic patients will need treatment. In many of these patients a direct surgical approach is often prohibitive due to age and multiple comorbidities. Endovascular treatment offers superior results and is becoming a recognized indication for such patients. Irrespective of the treatment modality close surveillance is mandatory in order to monitor disease progression.     

A treatment strategy for early thrombosed Stanford type A acute aortic dissection

Objective

Early thrombosed aortic dissection is a form of aortic dissection and includes the condition called aortic intramural hematoma. It was generally considered as surgical emergency. However, the optimal treatment strategy for acute type A intramural hematoma is becoming controversial after recent studies indicated more benign clinical course for this disease. We evaluated our strategy that integrated medical therapy, serial imaging, and timed surgery.

Methods

We reviewed 34 consecutive patients who were admitted to our hospital for early thrombosed Stanford type A acute aortic dissection from 2006 to 2011. Medical therapy or timed surgery was offered on the basis of radiological findings. Emergency or urgent surgery was not considered for a hemodynamically stable patient unless the ascending aortic diameter was ≧50 mm or the thickness of the thrombosed false lumen was ≧10 mm. Follow-up computed tomography was performed to detect a potential progression to aortic dissection.

Results

During the average follow-up period of 24.3 months, there was no aortic dissection-related mortality. And aortic dissection-related event was not recorded in patients who had surgical repair; however, in patients who did not have surgery, 3 (8.8 %) surgical conversions were recorded due to aortic dissection progression during the follow-up period. Twenty-one patients (61.8 %) ultimately had surgical repair, and 13 patients (38.2 %) had complete medical therapy. The overall survival rate at 3 years was 86.5 %.

Conclusions

Our strategy for the treatment of early thrombosed Stanford type A acute aortic dissection is reasonable, and the mid-term results were acceptable.