反复肺复张联合肺保护性通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征家兔肺损伤的影响

目的 评价反复肺复张联合肺保护性通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)家兔肺损伤的影响.方法 家兔24只,雌雄各半,体重2.5～3.5 kg,采用随机数字表法,将兔随机分为4组(n=6):正常对照组(Ⅰ组)、ARDS模型组(Ⅱ组)、肺保护性通气组(Ⅲ组)和反复肺复张联合肺保护性通气组(Ⅳ组).麻醉下进行机械通气,Ⅱ组、Ⅲ组和Ⅳ组采用静脉输注油酸0.1 ml/kg(经15 min输注)的方法 制备ARDS模型,模型制备成功后经3 min确定静态压力.容积曲线低位转折点.Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组的通气参数为:VT12 ml/kg,通气频率30次/min,呼气末正压(PEEP)0,FiO2 1.0,氧流量1 L/min,吸气时间0.6 s,吸呼比1.0∶2.3;Ⅲ和Ⅳ组通气参数为:VT6 ml/kg,PEEP为静态压力-容积曲线低位转折点对应气道力+2 cm H2O,其他通气参数同Ⅰ组和Ⅱ组,Ⅳ组分别在确定静态压力-容积曲线低位转折点后即刻、1、2和3 h时实施肺复张.肺复张的方法:吸气压力为30 cm H2O,吸气时间为30 s.分别于每次肺复张后采集动脉血样,测定PaO2,计算氧合指数.最后一次肺复张后1 h处死动物,取肺组织,测定TNF-α和IL-10的含量、髓过氧化物酶(MPO)活性、丙二醛(MDA)含量和湿/干重比(W/D比),计算TNF-α与IL-10的比值(TNF-α/IL-10),光镜下观察肺组织病理学结果.结果 与Ⅰ组比较,Ⅱ组氧合指数降低,肺组织TNF-α/IL-10、MPO、MDA和W/D比升高(P＜0.05);与Ⅱ组比较,Ⅲ组氧合指数升高,肺组织TNF-α/IL-10、MPO、MDA和W/D比降低(P＜0.05);与Ⅲ组比较,Ⅳ组氧合指数升高,肺组织TNF-α/IL-10、MPO、MDA和W/D比降低(P＜0.05).Ⅳ组肺组织损伤程度轻于Ⅲ组.结论 与肺保护性通气比较,肺保护性通气期间反复肺复张可进一步减轻ARDS家兔肺损伤,其机制与抑制肺组织炎性反应有关.

Abstract：

Objective To evaluate the effect of alveolar recruitment maneuvers (ARM) combined with lung protection mechanical ventilation on lung injury in a rabbit model of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) .Methods Twenty-four rabbits of both sexes weighing 2.5-3.5 kg were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=6 each):normal control group(group Ⅰ);ARDS group(group Ⅱ);ARDS+lung protection mechanical ventilation group (group Ⅲ) and ARDS + lung protection mechanical ventilation + ARM group (group Ⅳ). The animals were anesthetized with iv pentobarbital 20 mg/kg, tracheostomized and mechanically ventilated. Anesthesia was maintained with iv gammahydroxybutyrate infusion 100 mg·kg-1·h-1 and intermittent iv boluses of vecuronium. ARDS was induced with oleic acid 0.1 ml/kg injected iv over 15 min in Ⅱ ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ groups. In Ⅰand Ⅱ groups VT = 12 ml/kg, RR=30 bpm, I∶E=1.0=2.3, PEEP=0, FiO2=1, while in Ⅲ and Ⅳ groups VT=6 ml/kg, RR=30 bpm, I∶E=1.0=2.3, PEEP=airway pressure at lower inflection point+2 cm H2O, FiO2=1.ARM was performed by increasing the airway pressure to 30 cm H2O for 30 s once an hour in group Ⅳ. Arterial blood gas analysis was performed after each ARM. The animals were sacrificed at 1 h after the 3rd ARM. The lungs were removed for microscopic examination and determination of W/D lung weight ratio, TNF-α, IL-10 and MDA contents and MPO activity. TNF-α/IL-10 ratio was calculated. Results ARDS significantly decreased PaO2/FiO2 and increased TNF-α/IL-10 and W/D lung weight ratio, MPO activity and MDA content in the lung tissue. Lung protection mechanical ventilation significantly increased PaO2/FiO2 and decreased TNF-α/IL-10 and W/ D lung weight ratio, MPO activity and MDA content in the lung tissue. Lung protection mechanical ventilation + ARM significantly increased PaO2/FiO2 and decreased TNF-α/IL-10, W/D lung weight ratio, MDA content and MPO activity in group Ⅳ. Conclusion ARM combined with lung protection mechanical ventilation can further attenuate ARDS-induced lung injury by inhibiting inflammatory response.     

Relation of the static compliance curve and positive end-expiratory pressure to oxygenation during one-lung ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is commonly applied to the ventilated lung to try to improve oxygenation during one-lung ventilation but is an unreliable therapy and occasionally causes arterial oxygen partial pressure (PaO(2)) to decrease further. The current study examined whether the effects of PEEP on oxygenation depend on the static compliance curve of the lung to which it is applied. METHODS: Forty-two adults undergoing thoracic surgery were studied during stable, open-chest, one-lung ventilation. Arterial blood gases were measured during two-lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation before, during, and after the application of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP to the ventilated lung. The plateau end-expiratory pressure and static compliance curve of the ventilated lung were measured with and without applied PEEP, and the lower inflection point was determined from the compliance curve. RESULTS: Mean (+/- SD) PaO(2) values, with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 1.0, were not different during one-lung ventilation before (192 +/- 91 mmHg), during (190 +/- 90), or after ( 205 +/- 79) the addition of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP. The mean plateau end-expiratory pressure increased from 4.2 to 6.8 cm H(2)O with the application of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP and decreased to 4.5 cm H(2)O when 5 cm H(2)O PEEP was removed. Six patients showed a clinically useful (> 20%) increase in PaO(2) with 5 cm H(2)O PEEP, and nine patients had a greater than 20% decrease in PaO(2). The change in PaO(2) with the application of 5 cm H(2)O PEEP correlated in an inverse fashion with the change in the gradient between the end-expiratory pressure and the pressure at the lower inflection point (r = 0.76). The subgroup of patients with a PaO(2) during two-lung ventilation that was less than the mean (365 mmHg) and an end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation without applied PEEP less than the mean were more likely to have an increase in PaO(2) when 5 cm H(2)O PEEP was applied. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of the application of external 5 cm H(2)O PEEP on oxygenation during one-lung ventilation correspond to individual changes in the relation between the plateau end-expiratory pressure and the inflection point of the static compliance curve. When the application of PEEP causes the end-expiratory pressure to increase from a low level toward the inflection point, oxygenation is likely to improve. Conversely, if the addition of PEEP causes an increased inflation of the ventilated lung that raises the equilibrium end-expiratory pressure beyond the inflection point, oxygenation is likely to deteriorate.     

Effect of rate and inspiratory flow on ventilator-induced lung injury

BACKGROUND: We examined the effects of decreasing respiratory rate (RR) at variable inspiratory times (It) and reducing inspiratory flow on the development of ventilator-induced lung injury. METHODS: Forty sheep weighing 24.6+/-3.2 kg were ventilated for 6 hours with one of five strategies (FIO2 = 1.0, positive end-expiratory pressure = 5 cm H2O): (1) pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV), RR = 15 breaths/min, peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) = 25 cm H2O, n = 8; (2) PCV, RR = 15 breaths/min, PIP = 50 cm H2O, n = 8; (3) PCV, RR = 5 breaths/min, PIP = 50 cm H2O, It = 6 seconds, n = 8; (4) PCV, RR = 5 breaths/min, PIP = 50 cm H2O, It = 2 seconds, n = 8; and (5) limited inspiratory flow volume-controlled ventilation, RR = 5 breaths/min, pressure-limit = 50 cm H2O, flow = 15 L/min, n = 8. RESULTS: Decreasing RR at conventional flows did not reduce injury. However, limiting inspiratory flow rate (LIFR) maintained compliance and resulted in lower Qs/Qt (HiPIP = 38+/-18%, LIFR = 19+/-6%, p < 0.001), reduced histologic injury (HiPIP = 14+/-0.9, LIFR = 2.2+/-0.9, p < 0.05), decreased intra-alveolar neutrophils (HiPIP = 90+/-49, LIFR = 7.6+/-3.8,p = 0.001), and reduced wet-dry lung weight (HiPIP = 87.3+/-8.5%, LIFR = 40.8+/-17.4%,p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High-pressure ventilation for 6 hours using conventional flow patterns produces severe lung injury, irrespective of RR or It. Reduction of inspiratory flow at similar PIP provides pulmonary protection.     

Protective ventilation attenuates postoperative pulmonary dysfunction in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain if protective ventilation can attenuate the damaging postoperative pulmonary effects of cardiopulmonary bypass (increases in airway pressure, decreases in lung compliance, and increases in shunt). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial. SETTING: Single university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft procedure and early extubation. INTERVENTIONS: Thirteen patients received conventional mechanical ventilation (CV; respiratory rate, 8 breaths/min; tidal volume, 12 mL/kg; fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2], 1.0; positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP], +5), and 12 patients received protective mechanical ventilation (PV; respiratory rate, 16 breaths/min; tidal volume, 6 mL/kg; FIO2, 1.0; PEEP, +5). Perioperative anesthetic and surgical management were standardized. Various pulmonary parameters were determined twice perioperatively: 10 minutes after intubation and 60 minutes after arrival in the intensive care unit. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean postoperative increase in peak airway pressure in group CV was significantly larger than the mean postoperative increase in peak airway pressure in group PV (7.1 v 2.4 cm H2O; p < 0.001). Group CV experienced significant postoperative increases in plateau airway pressure (p = 0.007), but group PV did not (p = 0.644). The mean postoperative decrease in dynamic lung compliance in group CV was significantly larger than the mean postoperative decrease in dynamic lung compliance in group PV (14.9 v 5.5 mL/cm H2O; p = 0.002). Group CV experienced significant postoperative decreases in static lung compliance (p = 0.014), but group PV did not (p = 0.645). Group CV experienced significant postoperative increases in shunt (15.5% to 21.4%; p = 0.021), but group PV did not (18.4% to 21.2%; p = 0.265). CONCLUSIONS: Data indicate that protective ventilation decreases pulmonary damage caused by mechanical ventilation in normal and abnormal lungs. The results of this investigation indicate that protective ventilation may also help attenuate the postoperative pulmonary dysfunction (increases in airway pressure, decreases in lung compliance, and increases in shunt) commonly seen in patients after exposure to cardiopulmonary bypass.     

呼气末正压通气具有提高大剂量肾上腺素心肺复苏模型大鼠生存率的作用

背景 在心肺复苏(cardiopulmonary resuscitation,CPR)的模型上曾经验证过多种干预措施,目的是改良用药、完善胸外按压的手法及通气参数的设置,但呼气末正压通气(positive end-expiratory pressure,PEEP)对CPR的影响则未曾有研究涉及.鉴于PEEP能逆转肺不张...     

Relation of the Static Compliance Curve and Positive End-expiratory Pressure to Oxygenation during One-lung Ventilation

Background : Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is commonly applied to the ventilated lung to try to improve oxygenation during one-lung ventilation but is an unreliable therapy and occasionally causes arterial oxygen partial pressure (Pao2) to decrease further. The current study examined whether the effects of PEEP on oxygenation depend on the static compliance curve of the lung to which it is applied.

Methods : Forty-two adults undergoing thoracic surgery were studied during stable, open-chest, one-lung ventilation. Arterial blood gasses were measured during two-lung ventilation and one-lung ventilation before, during, and after the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP to the ventilated lung. The plateau end-expiratory pressure and static compliance curve of the ventilated lung were measured with and without applied PEEP, and the lower inflection point was determined from the compliance curve.

Results : Mean (+/- SD) Pao2 values, with a fraction of inspired oxygen of 1.0, were not different during one-lung ventilation before (192 +/- 91 mmHg), during (190 +/- 90), or after ( 205 +/- 79) the addition of 5 cm H2O PEEP. The mean plateau end-expiratory pressure increased from 4.2 to 6.8 cm H2O with the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP and decreased to 4.5 cm H2O when 5 cm H2O PEEP was removed. Six patients showed a clinically useful (> 20%) increase in Pao2 with 5 cm H2O PEEP, and nine patients had a greater than 20% decrease in Pao2. The change in Pao2 with the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP correlated in an inverse fashion with the change in the gradient between the end-expiratory pressure and the pressure at the lower inflection point (r = 0.76). The subgroup of patients with a Pao2 during two-lung ventilation that was less than the mean (365 mmHg) and an end-expiratory pressure during one-lung ventilation without applied PEEP less than the mean were more likely to have an increase in Pao2 when 5 cm H2O PEEP was applied.     

Physiologic effect and safety of the pumpless extracorporeal interventional lung assist system in patients with acute respiratory failure--a pilot study

Interventional lung assist (iLA) effectively reduces CO(2) tension and permits protective lung ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, there is little experience in using iLA in acute respiratory failure from various causes and no experience for small body sizes such as Asian patients. We evaluated the physiologic effect and safety of the iLA device in patients with acute respiratory failure from various causes. We enrolled 11 consecutive patients with severe respiratory failure from various causes. Wire-enforced cannulae (13-15 Fr) were inserted under ultrasound guidance and connected to iLA. Arterial blood gas analysis, ventilator parameters, hemodynamic parameter, and adverse events were recorded serially. During the first 24h of iLA use, mean blood flow was 1.08±0.15L/min, PaCO(2) decreased from 83.9±23.4mmHg to 40.7±10.2mmHg, and PaO(2) /FiO(2) ratio increased from 110±37 to 141±74. Minute ventilation decreased from 9.4±2.5 to 6.3±1.5L/min, and peak inspiratory pressure decreased from 30.3±7.1cm H(2) O to 28.8±9.4cm H(2) O. No serious adverse events were observed during iLA use. iLA showed effective CO(2) removal, allowed for reducing the invasiveness of mechanical ventilation in patients with severe respiratory failure from various causes even using a small-sized catheter and was safe in small body-sized patients.     

Hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure during partial liquid ventilation in newborn lambs

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) application on hemodynamics, lung mechanics, and oxygenation in the intact newborn lung during conventional ventilation (CV) and partial liquid ventilation (PLV) at functional residual capacity (FRC). CV or PLV modes of ventilation do not affect hemodynamics nor the optimum PEEP for oxygenation. METHODS: Seven newborn lambs (1 to 3 days old) were instrumented to measure pulmonary hemodynamics and airway mechanics. Each lamb was used as their own control to compare different modes of ventilation (CV followed by PLV) under graded variations of PEEP (4, 8, 12, and 16 cm H(2)O) on the influence on pulmonary blood flow and pulmonary vascular resistance. RESULTS: There was a significant drop in pulmonary blood flow (PBF) from baseline (PEEP of 4 cm H(2)O on CV, 1,229 +/- 377 mL/min) in both modes of ventilation on a PEEP of 16 cm H(2)O (CV, 750 +/- 318 mL/min v PLV, 926 +/- 396 mL/min, respectively; P <.05). Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) was higher on PLV at PEEP states of 4 cm H(2)O (16.5 +/- 1.3 cm H(2)O to 10.6 +/- 2.1 cm H(2)O; P <.05) and 8 cm H(2)O (18.8 +/- 2.2 cm H(2)O to 15.1 +/- 2.6 cm H(2)O; P <.05) when compared with CV. Conversely, PIP required to maintain the pCO(2) was lower on PLV at PEEP states of 12 (22.5 +/- 3.6 cm H(2)O to 24.2 +/- 3.8 cm H(2)O; P <.05) and 16 cm H(2)O (27.0 +/- 1.6 cm H(2)O to 34.0 +/- 5.9 cm H(2)O; P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodynamically, CO is impaired at a PEEP above 12 cm H(2)O in intact lungs. PFC at FRC does provide an advantage in lung mechanics more than 10 to 12 cm H(2)O of PEEP by decreasing the amount PIP needed to achieve the similar levels of gas exchange and minute ventilation, implying a reduced risk for barotrauma with chronic ventilation. Thus, selection of the appropriate level of PEEP appears to be important if PLV is to be utilized at FRC. The best strategy for PLV, including the selection of PEEP, remains to be determined.     

Immediate effects of positive end-expiratory pressure and low and high tidal volume ventilation upon gas exchange and compliance in patients with acute lung injury.

BACKGROUND: Protective ventilation, in general, includes low tidal volume ventilation and maintaining end-inspiratory plateau pressures less than 35 cmH2O. Recent clinical studies have determined that such an approach results in improved survival in patients with moderate to severe acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. However, experimental evidence suggests that repeated end-expiratory collapse and reexpansion contributes to ventilator-induced lung injury. We sought to determine the immediate effects of specific tidal volume-PEEP combinations upon oxygenation and static compliance in patients with moderate to severe acute lung injury. METHODS: Fourteen patients were prospectively studied and were treated with each of 10 tidal volume-PEEP combinations, applied in random order. After 5 minutes at each tidal volume-PEEP combination, PaO2/FIO2 and static compliance were recorded. Comparisons were made between low and high tidal volume ventilation as well as across five PEEP levels. RESULTS: At both low (6 mL/kg) and high (10 mL/kg) tidal volume ventilation, PaO2/FIO2 increased with increasing PEEP, up to 20 cmH2O. Similar changes in static compliance were not evident. Static compliance was highest at PEEP of 10 and 15 cmH2O, regardless of tidal volume. With PEEP set at 5 cmH2O, static compliance was significantly lower with 6 mL/kg than with 10 mL/kg tidal volumes. Overall, static compliance was lowest for both tidal volume conditions with PEEP set at 25 cmH2O. CONCLUSION: Low tidal volume ventilation with PEEP set at 5 cmH2O results in poor oxygenation and compliance in patients with moderate to severe acute lung injury. Similarly, PEEP set at 25 cmH2O did not improve oxygenation or compliance.     

The sigh in ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome)]

We studied 10 consecutive, sedated and paralyzed patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). The entire study lasted 4 hours, divided in 3 periods: 2 hours of recommended ventilation [lung protective strategy, LPS, i.e., ventilation with low tidal volume (< 8 mL/kg), limiting the plateau at 35 cm H2O, together with high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP)], 1 hour of sigh (LPS with 3 consecutive sighs/min at 45 cm H2O plateau pressure), and 1 hour of LPS. Total minute ventilation, PEEP, FiO2 and mean airway pressure were kept constant. The introduction of sighs induced a consistent recruitment and PaO2 improvement, and a decrease in venous admixture and PaCO2. Interrupting sighs and resuming LPS led to a progressive derecruitment, and all the physiological variables returned to baseline. Derecruitment was higher in patients with higher PaCO2 and lower VA/Q ratio. We conclude that: 1) LPS alone does not provide full lung recruitment and best oxygenation in ARDS; 2) application of sigh may provide pressure enough to recruit and volume enough to prevent reabsorption atelectasis.     

Cardiopulmonary effects of pressure support ventilation

Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is a newer mode of ventilatory support that augments the patient's spontaneous inspirations to a preselected peak inspiratory pressure. We studied the effects of adding low levels of PSV (5 to 10 cm H2O) in conjunction with intermittent mandatory ventilation (IMV) on 15 patients who required mechanical ventilation for flail chest and pulmonary contusion. Patients were selected for the study if, during weaning from IMV, the following criteria were met: (1) a PaCO2 level greater than 45 mm Hg, (2) a spontaneous respiratory rate (RR) greater than 30 breaths per minute, (3) a minute ventilation (VE) greater than 9.0 L/min, and (4) spontaneous tidal volumes (VT) of less than 2 mL/kg. The PSV was added to the IMV at a level that augmented spontaneous VT to greater than 4 mL/kg. An average of 9 +/- 3 cm H2O of pressure support resulted in a fall in the level of PaCO2 (50 +/- 4 to 43 +/- 5 mm Hg), spontaneous RR (36 +/- 5 to 16 +/- 3 breaths per minute), VE (12 +/- 2 to 8.4 +/- 1.5 L/min), and dead space-tidal volume ratio from (0.68 +/- 0.1 to 0.47 +/- 0.05). Mean airway pressure and PaO2 both increased, but these changes were not statistically significant. Oxygen consumption was also unchanged. These results suggest that in patients who are difficult to wean due to respiratory muscle fatigue (characterized by increasing RR and decreasing VT), PSV normalizes lung volumes, improves ventilation, and may expedite the weaning process.     

Application of nasal bi-level positive airway pressure to respiratory support during combined epidural-propofol anesthesia

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To examine whether nasal bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) can be used as an airway during combined epidural-propofol anesthesia. DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive case series study. SETTING: Operating room at a general hospital. PATIENTS: 213 ASA physical status I and II adult patients undergoing lower extremity or lower abdominal gynecology surgery. INTERVENTIONS: After epidural anesthesia, propofol was infused at 20 mg/kg/hr (P20) for 4 to 5 minutes followed by 5 mg/kg/hr (P5), and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) 8 cm H(2)O and BiPAP 14/8 cm H(2)O was applied. In clinical situations, BiPAP with respiratory rate (RR) 10 breaths/min was applied. Furthermore, tidal volume (V(T)) during anesthesia, the effect of changing pressure support levels, and evaluation of pressure-controlled ventilation without spontaneous breathing were examined. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: CPAP resulted in a high RR, marked increased PaCO(2), and slightly decreased PaO(2), whereas BiPAP showed no change or a slightly decreased RR, slightly increased PaCO(2), and no change in PaO(2) or a great increase in PaO(2) with oxygen delivery. In clinical applications, similar results were found and anesthetic conditions were sufficient. Tidal volume increased after induction and maintained increased values under BiPAP 14/8 cm H(2)O. Of V(T) at 2, 6, or 10 cm H(2)O of pressure support levels, the 6 cm H(2)O was appropriate. Vecuronium injection showed a slight decrease and then increase in V(T) and PaCO(2), but the values were within normal (safe) limits. Respiration after rapid and high-dose infusion of propofol showed a markedly decreased RR, but the V(T) was maintained, and PaCO(2) and PaO(2) were at safe values. Rapid induction with 2.0 mg/kg propofol followed by P5 showed satisfactory results, in all but the obese patients.CONCLUSIONS: BiPAP 14/8 cm H(2)0 with RR at 10 breaths/min during combined epidural-propofol anesthesia can be used to provide ventilatory support in lower extremity or lower abdominal gynecology surgery.     

Surfactant impairment after mechanical ventilation with large alveolar surface area changes and effects of positive end-expiratory pressure

We have assessed the effects of overinflation on surfactant function and composition in rats undergoing ventilation for 20 min with 100% oxygen at a peak inspiratory pressure of 45 cm H2O, with or without PEEP 10 cm H2O (groups 45/10 and 45/0, respectively). Mean tidal volumes were 48.4 (SEM 0.3) ml kg-1 in group 45/0 and 18.3 (0.1) ml kg- 1 in group 45/10. Arterial oxygenation in group 45/0 was reduced after 20 min compared with group 45/10 (305 (71) vs 564 (10) mm Hg); maximal compliance of the P-V curve was decreased (2.09 (0.13) vs 4.16 (0.35) ml cm H2O-1 kg-1); total lung volume at a transpulmonary pressure of 5 cm H2O was reduced (6.5 (1.0) vs 18.8 (1.4) ml kg-1) and the Gruenwald index was less (0.22 (0.02) vs 0.40 (0.05)). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from the group of animals who underwent ventilation without PEEP had a greater protein concentration (2.18 (0.11) vs 0.76 (0.22) mg ml- 1) and a greater minimal surface tension (37.2 (6.3) vs 24.5 (2.8) mN m- 1) than in those who underwent ventilation with PEEP. Group 45/0 had an increase in non-active to active total phosphorus compared with nonventilated controls (0.90 (0.16) vs 0.30 (0.07)). We conclude that ventilation in healthy rats with peak inspiratory pressures of 45 cm H2O without PEEP for 20 min caused severe impairment of pulmonary surfactant composition and function which can be prevented by the use of PEEP 10 cm H2O.      

Positive end-expiratory pressure prevents atelectasis during general anaesthesia even in the presence of a high inspired oxygen concentration

BACKGROUND: General anaesthesia impairs the gas exchange in the lungs, and moderate desaturation (SaO2 86-90%) occurred in 50% of anaesthetised patients in a blinded pulse oximetry study. A high FiO2 might reduce the risk of hypoxaemia, but can also promote atelectasis. We hypothesised that a moderate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) level of 10 cmH2O can prevent atelectasis during ventilation with an FiO2 = 1.0. METHODS: Atelectasis was evaluated by computed tomography (CT) in 13 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective surgery. CT scans were obtained before and 15 min after induction of anaesthesia. Then, recruitment of collapsed lung tissue was performed as a "vital capacity manoeuvre" (VCM, inspiration with Paw = 40 cmH2O for 15 s), and a CT scan was obtained at the end of the VCM. Thereafter, PEEP = 0 cmH2O was applied in group 1, and PEEP = 10 cmH2O in group 2. Additional CT scans were obtained after the VCM. Oxygenation was measured before and after the VCM. RESULTS: Atelectasis (> 1 cm2) was present in 12 of the 13 patients after induction of anaesthesia. At 5 and 10 min after the VCM, atelectasis was significantly smaller in group 2 than group 1 (P < 0.005). A significant inverse correlation was found between PaO2 and atelectasis. CONCLUSIONS: PEEP = 10 cmH2O reduced atelectasis formation after a VCM, when FiO2 = 1.0 was used. Thus, a VCM followed by PEEP = 10 cmH2O should be considered when patients are ventilated with a high FiO2 and gas exchange is impaired.     

Alveolar recruitment improves ventilatory efficiency of the lungs during anesthesia

PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to analyze the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), with and without a lung recruitment maneuver, on dead space. METHODS: 16 anesthetized patients were sequentially studied in three steps: 1) without PEEP (ZEEP), 2) with 5 cm H(2)O of PEEP and 3) with 5 cm H(2)O of PEEP after an alveolar recruitment strategy (ARS). Ventilation was maintained constant. The single breath test of CO(2) (SBT-CO(2)), arterial oxygenation, end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) and respiratory compliance were recorded every 30 min. RESULTS: Physiological dead space to tidal volume decreased after ARS (0.45 +/- 0.01) compared with ZEEP (0.50 +/- 0.07, P < 0.05) and PEEP (0.51 +/- 0.06, P < 0.05). The elimination of CO(2) per breath increased during PEEP (25 +/- 3.3 mL.min(-1)) and ARS (27 +/- 3.2 mL.min(-1)) compared to ZEEP (23 +/- 2.6 mL.min(-1), P < 0.05), although ARS showed larger values than PEEP (P < 0.05). Pa-etCO(2) difference was lower after recruitment (0.9 +/- 0.5 kPa, P < 0.05) compared to ZEEP (1.1 +/- 0.5 kPa) and PEEP (1.2 +/- 0.5 kPa). Slope II increased after ARS (63 +/- 11%/L, P < 0.05) compared with ZEEP (46 +/- 7.7%/L) and PEEP (56 +/- 10%/L). Slope III decreased significantly after recruitment (0.13 +/- 0.07 1/L) compared with ZEEP (0.21 +/- 0.11 1/L) and PEEP (0.18 +/- 0.10 1/L). The angle between slope II and III decreased only after ARS. After lung recruitment, PaO(2), EELV, and compliance increased significantly compared with ZEEP and PEEP. CONCLUSION: Lung recruitment improved the efficiency of ventilation in anesthetized patients.     

Intraoperative changes in arterial oxygenation during volume-controlled mechanical ventilation in modestly obese patients undergoing laparotomies with general anesthesia

BACKGROUND: In obese patients, arterial oxygenation can be greatly impaired during general anesthesia. Both avoidance of denitrogenation and application of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during mechanical ventilation may be effective in preventing such impairment of arterial oxygenation. METHODS: We studied 28 obese/overweight and seven non-obese (BMI < 25 kg x m-2) patients who underwent laparotomies with general anesthesia (i.e. isoflurane with or without nitrous oxide). During anesthesia, their lungs were mechanically ventilated at a rate of 10 breaths x min-1 with a constant flow, inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio 1 : 2, and tidal volume approximately 10 ml x kg-1. The obese/overweight patients were allocated to four different groups in terms of denitrogenation and application of PEEP (7 cm H2O) during the ventilation (n = 7 each). In the non-obese patients, their denitrogenated lungs were ventilated without application of PEEP. Arterial gas analyses were performed before induction of anesthesia, and 30, 90, 150 and 210 min after tracheal intubation. The ratio of PaO2 to FiO2 was calculated as an index of arterial oxygenation. RESULTS: No significant changes in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio were observed throughout the study in the non-obese patients and in the obese/overweight patients whose non-denitrogenated lungs were ventilated with PEEP. In the obese/overweight patients whose lungs were ventilated after denitrogenation or without application of PEEP, significant decreases in the PaO2/FiO2 ratio were observed 30 and 90 min after tracheal intubation. CONCLUSIONS: In obese or overweight patients under general anesthesia, it may be advisable to avoid denitrogenation and apply PEEP during mechanical ventilation in order to minimize the impairment of arterial oxygenation.     

双水平正压通气对急性肺损伤患者血气及血流动力学指标的影响

目的探讨应用脉搏指数连续心排血量（PiCCO）容量监测仪技术研究双水平正压通气模式对急性肺损伤（ALI）患者血气及血流动力学的影响,探讨这种新型呼吸模式应用于ALI患者的临床疗效,对循环系统的影响程度,以提高ALI的治愈率。方法42例ALI患者,男27例,女15例;年龄15～75岁。按患者的入院先后顺序将40例患者（2例未完成研究）分为两组,每组20例。双水平正压通气组：入院的第1～20例患者,给予双水平正压通气呼吸支持,采用支持/时间（S/T）模式,吸气末压初始设为8～10cmH2O,逐渐增加至14～20cmH2O,以患者舒适为宜;呼气末压初设为3～5cmH2O,逐渐增加至8～12cmH2O,吸入氧浓度（FiO2）保持不变。对照组：入院的第21～40例患者,采用辅助/控制（A/C）通气模式,并依次按5cmH2O,10cmH2O,15cmH2O,20cmH2O增加呼气末正压（PEEP）,每种压力持续30min,通气支持过程中FiO2保持不变。观察两组患者的心排血量（CO）、体循环血管阻力（SVR）等血流动力学和血气指标改变。结果两组死亡13例,其中双水平正压通气组死亡5例,对照组死亡8例。死于多器官功能衰竭7例,感染性休克3例,循环衰竭3例。双水平正压通气组气管内插管时间（2.9±0.8dvs.4.2±0.9d,t=7.737,P=0.006）和住院时间（17.2±4.5dvs.18.5±3.6d,t=2.558,P=0.039）明显短于对照组。对照组：当PEEP在5～15cmH2O范围内,患者动脉血氧分压（PaO2）、氧合指数（PaO2/FiO2）随着PEEP的增高而逐渐增加（P〈0.05）;当PEEP增加至20cmH2O时CO降低,SVR、肺循环阻力（PVR）和气道峰值压（PIP）较5～15cmH2O范围时增加（P〈0.05）。双水平正压通气组：PaO2、PaO2/FiO2随着EPAP的增高而逐渐增加,当EPAP增加至10cmH2O时PaO2、PaO2/FiO2达最大值（P〈0.05）;与对照组比较PIP明显降低（t=7.831,P=0.000）。结论对ALI/急性呼吸窘迫综合征（ARDS）患者给予双水平正压通气治疗可减少对呼吸和血     

An adult system versus a Bain system: comparative ability to deliver minute ventilation to an infant lung model with pressure-limited ventilation

We compared the efficacy of an adult circle system versus a Bain system to deliver minute ventilation (V(E)) to an infant test lung model using pressure-limited ventilation. To simulate a wide variety of potential infant clinical states, V(E) was measured with two compliances: at peak inspiratory pressures (PIP) of 20, 30, 40, and 50 cm H2O and at respiratory rates (RR) of 20, 30, 40, and 50 breaths/min. Each measurement was made three times, and their average was used for analysis. Data were analyzed using the multiple regression technique. In both normal and low-compliance lung models, V(E) was nearly identical between adult circle and Bain systems (P = 0.67 for normal compliance model, P = 0.89 for low-compliance model). V(E) positively correlated with RR (P < 0.001), PIP (P < 0.001), and lung compliance (P < 0.001). Very high PIP or RR were required to deliver V(E) to the low-compliance lung model. The adult circle system is equivalent to the Bain system in its ability to ventilate an infant test lung over a wide range of RR, PIP, and two compliances during pressure-limited ventilation. V(E) is dependent of PIP, RR, and lung compliance. With low-compliance lungs, both systems require a high PIP. We conclude that both anesthetic systems deliver ventilation over a wide range of respiratory variables during pressure-limited ventilation in infants. IMPLICATIONS: We obtained results from this infant test lung study that indicate that either an adult circle breathing system or the Bain system can reliably deliver ventilation over a wide range of respiratory variables during pressure-limited ventilation in infants.     

Comparison between conventional and protective one-lung ventilation for ventilator-assisted thoracic surgery

Recent papers suggest protective ventilation (PV) as a primary ventilation strategy during one-lung ventilation (OLV) to reduce postoperative pulmonary morbidity. However, data regarding the advantage of the PV strategy in patients with normal preoperative pulmonary function are inconsistent, especially in the case of minimally invasive thoracic surgery. Therefore we compared conventional OLV (VT 10 ml/kg, FiO2 1.0, zero PEEP) to protective OLV (VT 6 ml/kg, FiO2 0.5, PEEP 5 cmH2O) in patients with normal preoperative pulmonary function tests undergoing video-assisted thoracic surgery. Oxygenation, respiratory mechanics, plasma interleukin-6 and malondialdehyde levels were measured at baseline, 15 and 60 minutes after OLV and 15 minutes after restoration of two-lung ventilation. PaO2 and PaO2/FiO2 were higher in conventional OLV than in protective OLV (P<0.001). Interleukin-6 and malondialdehyde increased over time in both groups (P<0.05); however, the magnitudes of increase were not different between the groups. Postoperatively there were no differences in the number of patients with PaO2/FiO2<300 mmHg or abnormalities on chest radiography. Protective ventilation did not provide advantages over conventional ventilation for video-assisted thoracic surgery in this group of patients with normal lung function.     

Haemodynamic effects of pressure support and PEEP ventilation by nasal route in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND--Intermittent positive pressure ventilation applied through a nasal mask has been shown to be useful in the treatment of chronic respiratory insufficiency. Pressure support ventilation is an assisted mode of ventilation which is being increasingly used. Invasive ventilation with intermittent positive pressure, with or without positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), has been found to affect venous return and cardiac output. This study evaluated the acute haemodynamic support ventilation by nasal mask, with and without the application of PEEP, in patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypercapnia. METHODS--Nine patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease performed sessions lasting 10 minutes each of pressure support ventilation by nasal mask while undergoing right heart catheterisation for clinical evaluation. In random order, four sessions of nasal pressure support ventilation were applied consisting of: (1) peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) 10 cm H2O, PEEP 0 cm H2O; (2) PIP 10 cm H2O, PEEP 5 cm H2O; (3) PIP 20 cm H2O, PEEP 0 cm H2O; (4) PIP 20 cm H2O, PEEP 5 cm H2O. RESULTS--Significant increases in arterial oxygen tension (Pao2) and saturation (Sao2) and significant reductions in arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) and changes in pH were observed with a PIP of 20 cm H2O. Statistical analysis showed that the addition of 5 cm H2O PEEP did not further improve arterial blood gas tensions. Comparison of baseline values with measurements performed after 10 minutes of each session of ventilation showed that all modes of ventilation except PIP 10 cm H2O without PEEP induced a small but significant increase in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure. In comparison with baseline values, a significant decrease in cardiac output and oxygen delivery was induced only by the addition of PEEP to both levels of PIP. CONCLUSIONS--In patients with severe stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hypercapnia, pressure support ventilation with the addition of PEEP delivered by nasal mask may have short term acute haemodynamic effects in reducing oxygen delivery in spite of adequate levels of SaO2.