Conversion of temporary hemodialysis catheters to permanent hemodialysis catheters: a retrospective study of catheter exchange versus classic de novo placement

Many clinicians believe that de novo access is required when converting temporary hemodialysis (HD) catheters to long-term or permanent catheters. However, since vascular access sites are at a premium in the dialysis patient, it is important to preserve existing central venous catheters and conserve future access sites. In this retrospective study, data from 94 patients referred to interventional radiology for placement of long-term, tunneled HD catheters between July 2001 and September 2002 were reviewed. The study group consisted of 42 patients in whom the temporary catheter was exchanged for a peel-away sheath and a tunneled catheter inserted using the existing venous access site. The control group included 52 patients who received traditional de novo placement of permanent catheters. Based on available follow-up data, we report a 100% technical success rate, with 72% patency at 30 days in the study group (n = 32; mean age 58 years). By comparison, de novo catheter placement (n = 35; mean age 59 years) yielded a 100% technical success rate, with 83% patency at 30 days. The overall infection rate was 0.30 per 100 catheter-days (total 3036 catheter-days) and 0.36 per 100 catheter-days (total 3295 catheter-days), respectively (chi2 = 0.64, p > or = 0.05). There was no incidence of exit site infection, tunnel infection, or florid sepsis in either group. Likewise, no stenosis or bleeding complication was noted. Thus conversion of a temporary HD catheter to a tunneled catheter using the same venous insertion site is safe, does not increase the risk of infection, and allows conservation of other central venous access sites.     

Central venous catheters as a vascular access modality for pediatric hemodialysis

Background The use of hemodialysis catheters is an essential component of dialysis practice. Children are particularly likely to require multiple courses of dialysis over their lifetime, hence the repeated need for vascular access. These catheters remain a significant source of morbidity and mortality. Methods All catheters inserted for hemodialysis at the Center of Pediatric Nephrology and Transplantation, Cairo University over a period of 40 months were studied. Patient data as well as data of catheter insertion, dwell, cause of removal and complications were reported. Results A total of 195 uncuffed central venous catheters were used for temporary access in 131 patients for a mean duration of 35.7 days. Of attempted insertions, 87.4% achieved successful access, of which 56% remained for the required period, 8.9% were accidentally dislodged, and 35.1% were removed due to complications—mostly infection. The overall rate of possible catheter-related bacteremia was 9.6 episodes/ 1,000 catheter days. Infection increased with longer catheter dwell. Nineteen cuffed tunneled catheters were surgically inserted and used for up to 11 months (mean 117 days). Loss of these catheters was attributed mainly to infection (ten episodes) and catheter thrombosis (six episodes). During the study, 317 femoral catheters were inserted. Conclusion Uncuffed central venous catheters are both needed and useful for short-term hemodialysis. Vascular access for extended durations may be provided by cuffed tunneled catheters. Infection is the major serious concern with both uncuffed and cuffed catheters.     

Outcomes of tunneled femoral hemodialysis catheters: comparison with internal jugular vein catheters

BACKGROUND: Tunneled femoral vein dialysis catheters are used as a last resort when all other options for a permanent vascular access or thoracic central vein catheter have been exhausted. There is little published literature on the complications or outcomes of tunneled femoral catheters. METHODS: Using a prospective, computerized vascular access database, we identified all tunneled femoral dialysis catheters placed at the University of Alabama at Birmingham during a five-year period. The clinical features, catheter patency, and complications in these patients were compared to those observed in a group of sex-, age-, and date-matched control patients with tunneled internal jugular vein dialysis catheters. RESULTS: During the study period, 27 patients received a tunneled femoral dialysis catheter, accounting for 1.9% of all tunneled catheters placed. Only 7 patients (26%) were able to convert to a new permanent dialysis access. The primary catheter patency (time from placement to exchange) was substantially shorter for femoral catheters than for internal jugular dialysis catheters (median survival, 59 vs. >300 days, P < 0.0001). Infection-free survival was similar for both groups (P= 0.66). Seven patients with femoral catheters (or 26%) developed an ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis, but catheter use was possible with anticoagulation. CONCLUSION: Tunneled femoral dialysis catheters have a substantially shorter primary patency, but a similar risk of catheter-related bacteremia, as compared with internal jugular vein catheters. An ipsilateral lower extremity deep vein thrombosis occurs commonly after placement of a femoral dialysis catheter, but does not preclude continued catheter use.     

Hemodialysis catheters and ports

Percutaneous placement of cuffed tunneled catheters for hemodialysis access has become a firmly established method of providing vascular access to patients with end-stage renal disease. Considerable evidence supports the right internal jugular vein as the preferred site for catheter insertion. The use of real-time imaging using both ultrasound and fluoroscopy permits simple, safe, and effective placement of the catheter for hemodialysis. The use of these imaging techniques has significantly reduced the number of and severity of complications associated with catheter placement. A specific method of placement is described including variations for specific catheter types. The new subcutaneous port as an alternative to the cuffed tunneled catheter appears to provide another option for vascular access; preliminary data suggests higher flow rates and lower infection rates compared with externalized cuffed tunneled catheters. Finally, the criteria for obtaining training and proficiency in placement of cuffed tunneled catheters are outlined.     

Vascular screening prior to placement of tunnelled and cuffed hemodialysis catheters

Purpose: To demonstrate the importance of venous vascular screening before the placement of tunneled and cuffed hemodialysis catheters in patients requiring hemodialysis prior to placement and/or maturation of an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or graft (AVG). Methods: Between October 1998 and March 2000, all patients requiring hemodialysis access placement were prospectively evaluated with duplex ultrasound for status of upper extremity vessels and central veins prior to selection of a permanent access site. When interim tunneled and cuffed hemodialysis catheters were required, they were placed on the side contralateral to proposed AVF/AVG placement. No catheters were placed without initial vascular screening. The study group was compared to historical controls during a similar period (April 1997 through September 1998) when no vascular screening was performed. Results: During the study period, 234 screening duplex ultrasound examinations were performed in 244 patients. Ten patients required no screening prior to access site placement. Overall, 353 catheters were placed, 243 (69%) on the right side and 110 (31%) on the left side. During the control period, 394 catheters were placed in 255 patients, 306 (78%) right-sided and 88 (22%) left-sided. The increase in left-sided catheters with ultrasound screening and careful planning for future access sites was significant (p<0.01). Conclusion: Vascular-screening-directed catheter placement significantly alters the side of catheter placement when compared to a management protocol without prior screening. Such screening helps identify the side of permanent access placement, while directing interim catheters to the contralateral side such that central veins may be preserved for permanent access.     

A single institutional experience of conversion of non-tunneled to tunneled hemodialysis catheters: a comparison to de novo placement

Purpose

To compare the outcomes of conversion of non-tunneled to tunneled hemodialysis catheters with de novo placement of tunneled catheters and to determine the effect of time to conversion of non-tunneled to tunneled catheters on the incidence of complications.

Materials and methods

A retrospective data analyses was performed on 1,154 patients who had de novo placement of tunneled hemodialysis catheters (control group) and 254 patients who underwent conversion of non-tunneled to tunneled catheters (study group). The outcomes including technical complications, infection, and catheter dysfunction were compared between the two groups.

Results

The technical success rate was 100 % in both the groups with no complications recorded at the time of procedure or within 24 h of insertion. The most common complication encountered in both the groups was catheter dysfunction (15.6 % in controls and 18.1 % in study). Infection rates/100 catheter days for the control and study groups were 0.17 and 0.19, respectively. Infection-free survival was not statistically different between the two groups. The time spent with non-tunneled catheter prior to conversion did not significantly alter the rates of catheter dysfunction and infection in the study group.

Conclusion

The efficacy and safety of conversion of non-tunneled to tunneled hemodialysis catheters are similar to de novo placement with no difference in the rates of technical success, catheter dysfunction, or infection. However, the exchange of non-tunneled to tunneled catheter can help in preservation of veins for future vascular access, which is of vital importance in patients with chronic renal disease.     

Risk of bacteremia from temporary hemodialysis catheters by site of insertion and duration of use: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Uncuffed, nontunneled hemodialysis catheters remain the preferred means to gain immediate access to the circulation for hemodialysis. Bacteremia is the primary complication that limits their use. The risk of bacteremia by site of insertion and duration of use has not been well studied. METHODS: Two hundred eighteen consecutive patients who required a temporary hemodialysis catheter were prospectively followed. RESULTS: Catheters were placed at 318 new insertion sites and remained in use for a total of 6235 days. The incidence of bacteremia was 5.4% after three weeks of placement in internal jugular vein and 10.7% after one week in femoral vein [relative risk for bacteremia 3.1 (95% CI, 1.8 to 5.2)]. The incidence of bacteremia was 1.9% one day after the onset of an exit site infection but increased to 13.4% by the second day if the catheter was not removed. Guidewire exchange for malfunction and patient factors did not significantly affect the risk of bacteremia. CONCLUSIONS: Internal jugular catheters may be left in place for up to three weeks without a high risk of bacteremia, but femoral catheters in bed-bound patients should be removed after one week. Catheter exchanges over a guidewire for catheter malfunction do not increase bacteremia rates. Temporary catheters should be removed immediately if an exit site infection occurs.     

Implantation of permanent jugular catheters in patients on regular dialysis treatment: ten years' experience

Dual-lumen cuffed central venous catheter proved an important alternative vascular access compared to conventional arteriovenous (Cimino-Brescia) shunt in a selected group of patients on regular dialysis treatment. Typically, these catheters are used as bridging access, until fistula or graft is ready for use, or as permanent access when an arteriovenous fistula or graft is not planned (NKF-DOQI). We conducted a prospective study on IJV permanent catheter insertion and its related earlier and long-term complications. From February 1991 to February 2001 we inserted in 124 patients in end stage renal disease 135 cuffed catheters (130 in the right IJV and 5 in the left IJV), 92 of which were Permcath, 27 Vascath, and 16 Ash-Split. We performed the insertion of catheters by puncturing the IJV under ultrasonographic guid-ance in the lower side of the Sedillot triangle and checking the accurate position of the tip by endocavitary electrocardiography (EC-ECG). The duration of catheter use was from 60 to 1460 days, mean 345 days. The actuarial survival rate at 1 year was 82%, at 2 years 56%, at 3 years 42% and at 4 years 20%. The exit site infection and septicemia rates were 5.2 and 2.86 per 1000 catheter days respectively. Catheter sepsis was implicated in the death of three patients, all of whom had multiple medical problems. Several episodes of thrombosis (6% of dialyses) occurred which required urokinase treatment, and catheter replacement in 12 patients (9.6%). In 3 cases the catheters were displaced and correct repositioning was performed. Two catheters (Ash-Split) were replaced due to accidental damage of the external portion of catheters (alcoholic disinfectant). Catheter tip embolism occurred on one occasion during elective catheter exchange over guide-wire. One of the common problems encountered with cuffed tunneled catheters is poor blood flow, most often secondary to the formation of a fibrin sheath around the lumen. Even if we conducted a non-randomized study, in our experience, the higher rate of malfunctioning catheters was in the group with no anticoagulation therapy. Therefore, we suggest anticoagulation treatment in all patients wearing central vascular catheters with no contraindication. Just one year ago, we followed NKF-DOQI clinical practice guidelines for vascular access that indicated that for patients who have a primary AV fistula maturing, but need im-mediate hemodialysis, tunneled cuffed catheters are the access of choice and the preferred insertion site is the right IJV. Considering recent reports of permanent central venous stenosis or occlusion after IJV can-nulation, currently, our first choice is femoral vein cannulation with smooth silicone rubber catheters, tunneled if long-term utilization is needed (more the 3-4 weeks). In our opinion, the right IJV puncture is to be avoided as much as the venipuncture of arm veins suitable for vascular access placement, particularly the cephalic vein of the non-dominant arm. Our data confirm that permanent venous catheters might rep-resent an effective long-term vascular access for chronic hemodialysis, particularly for older patients with cardiovascular disease and for cancer patients.     

Transthoracic cuffed hemodialysis catheters: a method for difficult hemodialysis access

BACKGROUND: Recurrent vascular access failure is a major cause of morbidity in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis. Central venous catheters are often necessary for dialysis, and easily accessed vessels (ie, the internal jugular vein and subclavian vein) frequently occlude because of repeated cannulation. When standard access sites occlude, unconventional access methods become necessary. We report a technique of placing hemodialysis catheters directly into the superior vena cava (SVC). METHODS: Between January 2002 and December 2004, 22 patients with documented bilateral jugular and subclavian vein occlusion underwent transthoracic SVC permanent catheter placement. Femoral vein access was obtained, and a sheath was placed. Under fluoroscopic guidance, a diagnostic catheter was then inserted into the SVC, and a venogram was obtained. By using the fluoroscopic image as a reference guide, supraclavicular access directly into the SVC was performed with lateral and anteroposterior views to better localize the SVC. Once venous blood was obtained, a hydrophilic wire was passed into the inferior vena cava. A 5F sheath was then placed, and, with the use of an exchange catheter, the wire was switched for a stiffer wire. The hemodialysis catheter was then placed in the standard fashion over this wire. RESULTS: In a 24-month period, 22 patients underwent transthoracic permanent catheter placement. All patients had the permanent catheters successfully inserted. Two major complications occurred. One patient experienced a pneumothorax, and another patient experienced a hemothorax. Both patients were successfully treated with chest tube decompression. All permanent catheters functioned immediately with a range of 1 to 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: Transthoracic permanent catheter placement is an appropriate alternative for patients in whom traditional venous access sites are no longer available.     

New tunneled hemodialysis catheter placement through the old exit site

Accidental loss of tunneled hemodialysis catheters has been observed in chronic hemodialysis patients. Although a new catheter could be inserted using a fresh site, catheter insertion can also be accomplished by utilizing the existing exit site. In this analysis, we report 10 cases of an extruded tunneled hemodialysis catheter. The catheters had been in place for 2-6 months. The time elapsed after catheter extrusion ranged from 6 to 72 hours. None of the patients demonstrated any evidence of exit site or tunnel infection. Patient age ranged from 45 to 77 years. Diabetes mellitus was the cause of renal failure in 40% of the cases. Catheter insertion was accomplished by inserting a guidewire into the exit site and navigating it through the tunnel to the central venous system and into the right atrium. A diagnostic catheter was then navigated over the wire and contrast study performed to confirm the position. The wire was reinserted and a new tunneled hemodialysis catheter fed over the wire and into the atrium. Nine catheters were successfully placed using this technique. One patient had nausea and hiccups upon wire insertion into the atrium. There were no hemodynamic consequences. The wire was removed and a new catheter inserted on the other side using the left internal jugular vein. All of the catheters inserted using this technique functioned appropriately. There were no exit site or tunnel infections for up to 4 weeks' follow-up. We conclude that patients with catheter extrusion can receive a new catheter through the existing exit site, tunnel, and venotomy.     

Long-term central venous catheters: size and location do matter

BACKGROUND: Right or left side of placement for subclavian vein catheterization for placement of long-term central catheters and size of the catheters has not been analyzed completely. METHODS: The records of 502 consecutive long-term central venous catheters placed in patients while in the operating room over a 1-year period were reviewed and 230 subclavian vein tunneled catheters were analyzed. Technical difficulties in placing the catheters were defined as arterial puncture, guidewire malposition, catheter malposition, need to switch site of access, sheath difficulty, and inability to place the catheter. RESULTS: Three complications were identified (1%) and technical difficulties occurred in 15% of the patients. More difficulty was associated with the insertion of larger triple-lumen catheters than smaller single-lumen catheters (31% vs. 11%, respectively; P < .009). Right subclavian placement was associated with a 24.4% technical difficulty rate versus a 10.4% technical difficulty rate for left subclavian placement (P < .005). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports placing the smallest catheter necessary via the left subclavian vein.     

Do AshSplit haemodialysis catheters provide better flow rates in the long term?

BACKGROUND: Recently, interventional radiologists have adopted an increasingly prominent role in the placement and management of hemodialysis catheters, as well as in the research and development of new and better catheters. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the viability and hemodialysis efficiency of the AshSplit catheter and the Permcath catheter. METHODS: 204 consecutive patients requiring radiological insertion of hemodialysis catheters were followed, retrospectively, over a 42-month period. Both hemodialysis catheters were placed using a combination of ultrasonic and fluoroscopic guidance and tunneled appropriately. Information collected included catheter insertion sites, insertion complications, catheter duration, and final outcome. RESULTS: Over the study period of two years, 269 catheters were placed into 204 patients with end stage renal failure. Patients received either an AshSplit (101 patients, 127 catheters) or a Permcath (103 patients, 142 catheters). Vascular access route of choice was the right internal jugular vein (67% AshSplit, 71% Permcath). Insertion complications occurred in 18 patients overall (6.6%), with only 1 requiring further intervention (hemopneumothorax). Flow rates averaged 259 mls/min for AshSplits and 248 mls/min for Permcaths (p < 0.001). Follow-up of catheter viability for 42 months yielded a mean AshSplit catheter duration of 246 days (range 6-932) and 239 days (range 1-1,278) for Permcath (p = 0.46). Reasons for catheter failure and elective catheter removal were similar in both groups; however, Permcaths required significantly more thrombolysis than AshSplits, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: The AshSplit provides significantly better flow rates and less thrombolysis compared to the Permcath, with similar catheter dwell times.     

Bacterial colonization of chronic hemodialysis catheters: Evaluation with endoluminal brushes and heparin aspirate

Tunneled catheters serve as interim access during maturation of a graft or fistula, or as a permanent vascular access in those patients who have exhausted their traditional access sites. However, bacteremia rates are high in patients with chronic catheters and indiscriminate removal of catheters during bacteremia increases morbidity and costs. A method to identify whether a catheter was colonized with the offending bacteria, without requiring catheter removal is desirable. We compared endoluminal brushing and heparin aspiration, to detect catheter colonization, in 24 asymptomatic patients undergoing elective tunneled hemodialysis catheter removal. The incidence of catheter colonization was highly correlated with catheter duration of inverted exclamation markY 30 days (p=0.03). Staphylococcus epidermidis represented 68% of the organisms isolated. No other organism accounted for more than 7% of the total. Fifteen (62.5%) of the 24 catheters had positive cultures. Eleven of the catheters were positive by culture of heparin aspirate and eight were positive by endoluminal brushing. Only four of the catheters were positive by both methods. The arterial lumen was more likely to have positive cultures than the venous lumen using either method. In this prospective investigation of tunneled hemodialysis catheters in asymptomatic patients we have demonstrated that a heparin aspirate sample is more likely to detect catheter colonization than a sample obtained using an endoluminal brush. Furthermore, 75% of catheters present for more than 30 days were colonized. Further study is needed to determine if the heparin aspirate method could be used in patients with bacteremia to accurately identify catheters that need removal.     

New tunneled haemodialysis catheter placement preserving the vasculature

Frequent dialysis line insertion can result in central venous occlusions rendering such access of difficult catheterization. New strategies to overcome this difficulty have been reported. This problem also occurs together with accidental loss of tunneled dialysis catheters, periodically observed in chronic hemodialysis patients. We developed a new technique to apply in these situations using the old tunnel. It is exposed close to the vein puncture site and opened to insert the guidewire, advancing the new catheter along it. A new subcutaneous tunnel is performed. We report three cases with successful catheter placement using this technique. Catheters functioned appropriately and no complications were recorded. We conclude that this maneuver can be used to resolve an extruded tunneled hemodialysis catheter while at the same time preserving other vascular access routes.     

Survival and complications of cuffed catheters in children on chronic hemodialysis

 Central venous catheters are being increasingly used as hemodialysis vascular access. We evaluated catheter survival, outcome predictors, and complications in a total of 36 catheters used in 13 children and young adults undergoing chronic maintenance hemodialysis through catheter for a duration of 10.4±5.6 months. Reasons for catheter failure were: thrombosis 12 of 36 (33%), infection 6 of 36 (17%), and extrusion 2 of 36 (5.4%). Catheters were lost to infection and thrombosis at 1.1 and 2.2 episodes per 1,000 catheter days, respectively. Symptomatic infections, Gram-negative and polymicrobial sepsis increased the risk of catheter failure. Most of the thrombotic episodes occurred in patients with inherent thrombotic tendency. The survival of the 36 catheters was 62% at 1 year. The survival of 13 randomly chosen catheters, 1 from each patient, was 85% at 1 year. The time from insertion to first complication correlated significantly with the outcome (P<0.03). We conclude that central venous catheters are still associated with a high rate of failure and may be a regular access choice only in a selected patient population with no inherent thrombotic tendency and no other option available for long-term hemodialysis. Received: 21 July 1997 / Revised: 20 July 1998 / Accepted: 22 July 1998     

Use of the Tesio catheter for hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal failure: a 2-year prospective study

BACKGROUND: The Tesio catheter system has been proposed to be a reliable source of vascular access for the dialysis patient with low rates of infection and other complications. Whether such catheters provide reliable short- and long-term access remains undetermined. METHODS: This study prospectively examined all Tesio lines inserted over a 2-year period in patients with end-stage failure with careful recording of all catheter complications and reasons for catheter loss. RESULTS: 100 catheters were inserted in 82 patients giving a total experience of 13,749 catheter days; 74 catheters were inserted into the jugular veins, the remainder into the femoral veins; 82 insertions were covered with antibiotics. At the end of the study, 29 catheters remained in situ. Of the remaining 71 catheters, 27 catheters were removed because of fashioning of definitive access. Nine catheters were lost due to infection and 10 were lost due to non-function; 19 patients died with a functioning catheter. Episodes ofnon-function were the major complications, although catheter patency was restored in 90% of cases utilizing urokinase and warfarin. Overall 80% of femoral and 16% of jugular catheters required anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Tesio catheters inserted into the jugular or femoral veins can provide excellent access whilst awaiting definitive dialysis access. They are well-tolerated with a low complication rate compared to standard temporary central venous catheters. Non-function remains a significant problem, especially in femoral catheters, which should be anticoagulated following insertion. Because of our results we suggest that these catheters be used as part of the co-ordinated approach to the management of vascular access in end-stage renal failure patients without definitive access.     

Complications of catheters: tunneled and nontunneled

Central venous catheters for hemodialysis remain an indispensable modality of vascular access in the United States. Despite strong recommendations by the NKF-KDOQI guidelines to reduce the dependence on catheters, > 80% of all patients initiate hemodialysis using a central venous catheter. Although the tunneled dialysis catheters have some advantages, their disadvantages are many and often dwarf the miniscule advantages. This review is intended to discuss the complications--both acute and chronic--related to the use of tunneled dialysis catheters for hemodialysis access.     

Using cuffed and tunnelled central venous catheters as permanent vascular access for hemodialysis: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Adequate care of a hemodialysis patient requires constant attention to the need to maintain vascular access (VA) patency. VA complications are the main cause of hospitalization in hemodialysis patients. The native arteriovenous fistula (NAVF), synthetic arteriovenous grafts fistula (GAVF) and silastic cuffed central venous catheters (CVCs) are used for permanent vascular access (PVA). CVCs are primary the method of choice for temporary access. But using this access modality is increasing more and more for PVA in elderly hemodialysis patients and when other PVA is not possible. The primary aim of this study is to investigate survivals and complications of the CVCs used for long-term VA. METHODS: We prospectively looked at 92 CVCs (Medcomp Ash Split Cath, 14 FR x 28 cm (Little, M.A.; O'Riordan, A.; Lucey, B.; Farrell, M.; Lee, M.; Conlon, P.J.; Walshe, J.J. A prospective study of complications associated with cuffed, tunnelled hemodialysis catheters. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2001, 16 (11), 2194-2200) with Dacron cuff) inserted in 85 (50 females, 35 males) chronic hemodialysis patients (the mean age: 56.6 +/- 14.1 years) from July 1999 to January 2002. The overall survival and complications were followed up. Furthermore, the patients were evaluated for demographic and clinical characteristics. Data were analysed by chi-square, Wilcoxon rank and Kaplan-Meier survival tests. RESULTS: The median duration of CVC survival was 289 days (range: 10-720). Eleven (11.9%) CVCs were removed due to complications. In 79 (92.9%) patients, 1, in 5 (5.8%) patients, 2 and in 1 patient, 3 CVCs were inserted. Of the 85 patients, 56 have CVCs functioning. In addition, 27 (31.76%) patients have CVCs functioning for over 12 months, 17 (20%) patients have CVCs functioning for 6 months. The total incidence of CVC related infections was 0.82 episodes/1000 catheter days. Besides, thrombosis was occurred in 10 (10.8%) CVCs. The most frequent indications for CVC removal were patient death (69.4%), thrombosis (16.6%) and CVC-related infections (13.8%). CONCLUSIONS: CVCs are primarily used for temporary access. But this study indicates that CVC may be a very useful alternative permanent vascular access for hemodialysis patients when other forms of vascular access are not available.     

A modified supraclavicular approach for central venous catheterization by manipulation of ventilation in ventilated patients

Background: Because of overuse and multiple implantations of hemodialysis catheters through internal jugular or subclavian vein (SCV) in patients with chronic hemodialysis, these veins often become stenotic or occlude, therefore necessitating alternative access. We introduce a new technique in ventilated patients for placement of tunneled cuffed chronic hemodialysis catheter: modified supraclavicular approach by cease of ventilation. Methods: Patients who received implantation of the tunneled cuffed chronic hemodialysis catheters by supraclavicular approach were collected from February 2003 to July 2005. Right subclavian, right innominate or left SCVs were accessed through the supraclavicular approach for catheter insertion. The procedures were performed by certificated anesthesiologists. The following parameters were recorded: co‐morbidities, laboratory examinations before the procedure, method for catheterization, duration of procedure, complications related to catheterization and long‐term outcome of hemodialysis catheters. Results: Eleven catheters were inserted in nine patients (two patients received twice) by supraclavicular approach during this period. All patients were mechanically ventilated and these catheters (seven at right and four at left) were implanted using the modified supraclavicular approach with lung deflation during venipuncture, advance of guidewire, and insertion of catheter. There were no procedural complications. The average duration of whole procedure was 36.6 minutes (30–45 minutes) and the mean catheter survival days were 62.1 days (13–152 days). The estimated duration was <1 minute of each period of lung deflation. There were no desaturation or pneumothorax during the whole procedure. Conclusion: The modified supraclavicular approach with lung deflation for tunneled cuffed chronic hemodialysis catheter in ventilated patients is at least as effective as traditional approach and can be easily performed by surgeons as well as experienced physicians. Based on the results, this simplified technique using lung deflation may be particularly useful to decrease procedural complications.     

Azygos arch cannulation by central venous catheters for hemodialysis

Cannulation of central veins and placement of catheters for temporary haemodialysis is a common procedure in the management of patients with end stage renal failure. The internal jugular vein is the site of choice for central venous catheter placement, being associated with the lowest complication rate. This procedure can be associated with a variety of malpositions of the catheter and rarely, can lead to significant morbidity and even mortality, if this is not recognised and corrected early. For anatomical reasons, the risk of azygos arch cannulation is substantially increased if catheters are inserted via left-sided veins. We report a case with a rare complication associated with the insertion of a catheter for temporary haemodialysis.