分段切开多重挂线术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床研究

为观察分段切开、多重挂线术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床疗效,将75例高位复杂性肛瘘随机分为两组,治疗组44例采用分段切开、多重挂线术治疗;对照组31例采用传统切开挂线术治疗,并对两组进行对比观察。结果显示,治疗组与对照组愈显率分别为95．5％和93．5％（P〉0．05）,但两组间的术后疼痛程度、肛门功能情况及创面愈合时间有显著性差异,治疗组优于对照组（P〈0．05,P〈0．01）。结果表明,在治疗高位复杂性肛瘘时分段切开、多重挂线术与传统切开挂线术相比,具有手术操作简单,对组织损伤小,患者痛苦小、疗程短、肛门功能保护好等优点,该术式的应用,使得高位复杂性肛瘘的治疗更加安全、有效。     

分段切口挂线引流术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘

我们采用分段多切口挂线引流术配合中药消炎洗散熏洗坐浴治疗高位复杂性肛瘘 73例 ,取得了满意疗效 ,现将治疗情况报告如下。1　临床资料1.1　一般资料 :本组 73例 ,其中男 6 7例 ,女 16例 ;年龄 12～ 72岁 ,2 0～ 5 0岁 5 4例 (占 74 % ) ,6 0～ 72岁 6例 (占 9% ) ;病程 2个月至 12年。1.2　治疗方法 :术前清洁灌肠 ,在低位骶麻下 ,先作美兰染色及指诊 ,肛镜 ,探针等检查 ,查明瘘管走向 ,内口位置及瘘管与肛门括约肌的关系。再用探针由瘘管的主外口探入 ,在与内口相应方向的肛缘以探针为标志作放射状小切口 ,探针从小切口探入 ,至内口探出…     

低位切开高位挂线术治疗复杂性肛瘘46例

我科采用低位切开高位挂线的手术方法治疗复杂性肛瘘46例,取得满意疗效,现报告如下。 临床资料：本组男38例,女8例;低位复杂性肛瘘34例,高位复杂性肛瘘12例。外口最少2个,最多6个。     

切开挂线对口引流术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床观察

目的探讨切开挂线对口引流术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床疗效。方法选取我院收治的高位复杂性肛瘘患者88例作为研究对象,随机分为两组,观察组和对照组各44例。观察组患者使用切开挂线对口引流手术治疗,对照组患者采用传统的切开挂线术治疗,对照两组患者的临床治疗效果,并发症发生率以及术后的复发率等情况。结果所有高位复杂性肛瘘的患者经手术,均全部治愈,有效率100%,且无感染、大出血等情况出现。但观察组患者手术后的创面恢复时间、平均住院时间等均显著优于对照组患者,P0.05。观察组患者术后的肛门括约肌功能显著优于对照组患者。对患者进行一年左右的随访,观察组患者无一例复发,无一例出现肛门狭窄、畸形或者肛门失禁等并发症和后遗症,对照组患者复发3例,经治疗痊愈。结论高位复杂性肛瘘病变部位高而深,主、支管多,内外口不易辨认,解剖学结构较为复杂。切开挂线对口引流手术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床疗效好,术后并发症发生率和复发率低,一次成功,肛门括约肌功能受损程度轻,创面恢复快,值得临床推广应用。     

分段双重挂线术治疗高位肛瘘的临床研究

为观察分段双重挂线术治疗高位肛瘘的临床疗效,将60例高位肛瘘患者分为研究组（30例）和对照组（30例）。研究组采用分段双重挂线术,对照组采用切开挂线术,以术后2d、术后7d、术后14d、术后3个月、术后6个月（随访记录）的临床症状及创面愈合时间、有无术后并发症等作为主要观察指标。结果显示,研究组能有效减轻术后疼痛、渗出等症状的程度,缩短手术创面愈合时间;远期随访（术后3个月、术后6个月）,在疗效及术后并发症方面,两组差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结果表明,分段舣重挂线术治疗高位肛瘘疗效可靠,能有效减轻术后症状,手术创面愈合时间短,瘢痕小,是一种行之有效的手术方法。     

切开挂线对口引流治疗高位复杂性肛瘘179例

目的：探讨切开挂线对口引流治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的疗效。方法：采用切开挂线对口引流法.结果：179例患者一次性治愈132例，二次治愈47例，平均住院时间28．1d，随访半年至8年，无1例复发及肛门失禁。结论：结果提示切开挂线对口引例流疗法具有治愈率高，患者痛苦轻，疗程短等优点。     

低位切开高位虚挂线术治疗高位肛瘘临床观察

目的探讨低位切开高位虚挂线术治疗高位肛瘘临床疗效。方法将27例高位肛瘘患者随机分为两组,其中治疗组13例,采用低位切开高位虚挂术;对照组14例,采用低位切开高位实挂术。两组术后作对比观察。结果治疗组与对照组治愈率分别为92．3％和92．9％,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）,但治疗组和对照组在术后疼痛,术后及术后3个月肛门功能评价,并发症（漏气、锁眼畸形）等,差异均有统计学意义（P〈0．05）。结论虚挂线术和实挂线术治疗高位肛瘘治愈率,差异无统计学意义,但虚挂线术较实挂线术能更好的保护肛门括约肌功能,减少肛门失禁的发生。     

低位切开高位挂线治疗复杂性肛瘘24例

2007年6月—2009年10月,我科采用低位切开高位挂线（以下简称低切高挂）的方法治疗高位复杂性肛瘘24例,疗效满意,现报告如下。     

低位挂线高位扩创引流术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的应用体会

目的总结低位挂线高位扩创引流术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的体会。方法选择2016-11-2018-06间收治的60例高位复杂性肛瘘患者,随机分为2组,每组30例。对照组行低位切开高位挂线术治疗,研究组患者采用低位挂线高位扩创引流术治疗。比较2组的疗效。结果研究组住院及创面愈合时间均短于对照组,术后6个月肛门功能评分(Wexner评分)优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组治愈率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论低位切开高位挂线术和低位挂线高位扩创引流术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘均有确切效果,但后者创面愈合时间更短,并提高肛门功能的保护性。     

切挂开窗引流术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床研究

目的：探讨中西医结合治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的最佳临床技术。方法：采取主管切挂、支管开窗引流术治疗高位复杂性肛瘘７８例并进行疗效分析。结果：治愈率１００％，即成功地保护了肛门的括红功能，又无并发症与后遗症。结论：本术式是对传统术式的成功改良，是目前中西医相结合治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的较理想的术式。     

定向挂线在高位肛瘘治疗中的临床效果

目的 治疗高位肛瘘时为避免使用传统挂线产生较严重的后遗症，提出有效解决办法。方法 使挂线按照手术者设定的方向缓慢切割、引流，即通过改变肛管与瘘管两侧橡皮筋的压力面积来产生压强差，导致不同的切割速度和距离以达到定向切割目的；并将效果与传统挂线做比较。结果 使用定向挂线治疗的患者未出现肛管畸形、肛门漏气漏液及大便失禁等后遗症；通过肛管测压检验其影响，显示诸项指标无显著改变；对比效果优于传统挂线，差异有显著性（P〈0．05）。结论 定向挂线能有效地避免传统挂线导致的后遗症，并能较好地完成对挂线的要求。     

量化传统挂线疗法对高位肛瘘术后肛门功能影响的研究

目的 观察高位肛瘘术中不同程度挂线后肛门功能改变情况.方法 本研究共观察病例45例,分为3组,每组15例,均行低位切开高位挂线手术,以挂线勒割肌束收紧长度为分组观察依据.结果 肛管压力下降以静息压为著,1/4组下降为(15.09±2.91)%,1/3组为(24.77±1.15)%,1/2组为(33.32±1.91)%,...     

高位复杂性肛瘘的治疗进展

阐述了在治疗高位复杂性肛瘘方面的新方法和技术，介绍了改良的挂线术、保留括约肌的术式和封堵注入术的治疗方法和效果。改良的挂线引流术式仍是治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的主要方法；新近出现的保留括约肌的手术方法为减少肛门功能失禁、彻底治疗高位复杂性肛瘘提供了可能；封堵填充术因其操作简单、较好的治愈率等特点正成为非手术治疗的主要方法。     

Faecal incontinence after seton treatment for anal fistulae with and without surgical division of internal anal sphincter: a systematic review

Objective The challenge of surgery for anal fistula is to eradicate the fistula track while maintaining anal continence. Seton placement is recommended to reduce postoperative faecal incontinence but interestingly a great range of functional impairment after surgery has been published. The aim of this study was to analyse the influence of intra‐operative internal anal sphincter division during tight or cutting seton technique for cryptogenic anal fistula, on the results of recurrence and postoperative faecal incontinence. Method A systematic literature review was performed to identify published series from 1966 to May 2007 of patients with anal fistula treated by a tight or cutting seton technique. The published series has been divided in to those where preservation of internal anal sphincter was performed (PIAS group) or where intra‐operative surgical division was undertaken in the time of seton placement (SIAS group) .The main endpoints of the review were to study anal fistula recurrence rate and postoperative faecal incontinence. Results Eighteen studies including 19 series and 448 patients were analysed in detail. Recurrence rate was 5.0% and 3.0% in PIAS and SIAS group respectively. Overall faecal incontinence rate was 5.6% in PIAS group and 25.2% in SIAS group. Conclusion Although based on low‐evidence studies, intra‐operative preservation of internal anal sphincter at the time of seton insertion for anal fistula seems to reduce the postoperative faecal incontinence without a substantial increase in recurrence rates.     

The outcome of surgery for complex anal fistula

Objective The aim of this study was to examine the results of surgery for complex anal fistulas treated by a variety of techniques, in terms of fistula healing, recurrent anal sepsis and effect of surgery on anal continence. Patients and methods This study included 63 patients with complex fistulas treated between November 1995 and September 1999. A variety of techniques were employed, including short‐term loose seton drain (12), long‐term loose seton drain (11), cutting seton (17), and rectal advancement flap (19). Outcome was assessed at clinic review and continence was further assessed by detailed questionnaire sent to the patients sometime after surgery. Results Healing occurred in 9 (75%) patients treated with a short‐term, loose drainage seton; 16 (94%) patients treated with a cutting seton and 17 (89%) patients in the rectal advancement flap group. Incontinence reported at clinic review seemed to be more frequent in the advancement flap group. However, a detailed continence questionnaire revealed that 50% of patients reported episodes of incontinence to flatus or liquid after all techniques, which had not been detected at routine clinical review. Incontinence to solids was only reported by two of the patients who had been treated with a cutting seton. Conclusions Complex fistulas may be successfully treated by a variety of techniques. Disturbed anal continence following surgery is common and worse than clinic assessment would suggest.     

经括约肌间瘘管结扎术治疗高位单纯性肛瘘的临床疗效

目的 评估经括约肌间瘘管结扎术(LIFT)治疗高位单纯性肛瘘的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析2011年1月至2012年6月北京普仁医院与北京朝阳医院收治的77例高位单纯性肛瘘患者的临床资料,患者分别采用LIFT手术法(LIFT组,37例)和切开挂线法(切开挂线组,40例)进行治疗,对两组患者的手术时间、创口愈合时间、术后疼痛时间及严重程度、复发率及对肛门功能影响等进行对照分析.正态分布的计量资料采用t检验,非正态分布的计量资料及等级资料采用秩和检验,计数资料采用x2检验.结果 LIFT组和切开挂线组患者手术时间分别为(21.4±2.0) min及(20.6±1.9) min,两组比较,差异无统计学意义(t=1.911,P＞0.05).术后LIFT组仅17例感轻度疼痛,无中度以上疼痛;切开挂线组轻度疼痛7例、中度疼痛14例、重度疼痛19例;LIFT组疼痛持续时间为(3.0±1.3)d,切开挂线组为(14.1 ±1.5)d;LIFT组在术后疼痛程度及持续时间均明显低于切开挂线组,差异有统计学意义(u=-7.189,t=34.534,P＜0.05).LIFT组和切开挂线组创口愈合时间分别为(26.0±1.9)d和(40.7 ±2.8)d,肛门瘢痕面积分别为(1.24±0.20) cm2和(2.64±0.25) cm2,术后中位肛门功能评分分别为1分和4分,两组比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=26.574,26.868,Z=-7.513,P＜0.05).两组患者治疗有效率均为100％,LIFT组和切开挂线组患者痊愈率分别为51.4％ (19/37)和42.5％(17/40),复发率分别为5.4％ (2/37)和2.5％ (1/40),两组痊愈率、复发率比较,差异均无统计学意义(x2=0.605,0.433,P＞0.05).结论 高位单纯性肛瘘行LIFT治愈率高,术后疼痛轻且持续时间短,创口愈合快,肛门功能保护好,复发率低.     

主管虚挂引流治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的临床对比观察

目的探讨主管虚挂引流治疗高位复杂性肛瘘的价值。方法 60例高位复杂性肛瘘患者随机分为试验组和对照组,每组30例。试验组采用主管虚挂引流术,对照组采用传统切挂术。结果两组治愈率差异无统计学意义(P0.05),但两组间的术后疼痛程度、疼痛持续天数、创口愈合天数差异有统计学意义(P0.05),在肛门功能评价方面,两组手术后及组间肛门失禁评分(Wexner评分)及肛门动力学测试差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论主管虚挂引流术在治疗高位复杂性肛瘘痛苦小、疗程短,能有效地保护肛门括约肌功能,是较实用的手术术式。     

Long‐term outcome of loose seton for complex anal fistula: a two‐centre study of patients with and without Crohn’s disease

Objective Complex anal fistulas traverse a significant portion of the external sphincter muscle, making their treatment a surgical challenge. Several surgical options are used with conflicting results. The aim of this study was to analyse the results of permanent loose seton in the management of high anal fistulas in Crohn’s disease (CD) patients and two‐stage seton fistulotomy in patients without CD. Method We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 77 patients with complex anal fistula treated by loose seton over a 4‐year period, in two medical centres. Recorded parameters included demographics, medical history, type of fistula, disease duration, previous surgery, morbidity, recurrence and mortality. Results Sixty patients without CD underwent 107 fistula‐related surgical procedures, and 17 CD patients underwent 29 procedures. Early postoperative complications were recorded in eight (10%) patients. Perioperative complications, mainly local sepsis or bleeding, were recorded in eight (10%) patients. Long‐term complications were observed in nine non‐CD and four CD patients. During a median follow‐up period of 24 months, the recurrence rate was 40% in CD patients and 47% in patients without CD. Five patients (four non‐CD patients and one CD patient) developed some degree of faecal incontinence. Conclusion The fistula recurrence rate following two‐stage seton fistulotomy in non‐CD patients was high. In CD patients the use of permanent loose seton is effective in controlling local sepsis in about half of patients and has low rates of subsequent incontinence.