Nonoperative management of solid organ injuries in children. Is it safe?

OBJECTIVE: The authors reviewed their experience with life-threatening blunt injuries in approximately 2900 children (0-14 years) admitted to the designated state pediatric shock trauma unit between 1990 and 1993. METHODS: During this time, the authors treated all severely injured children with a prospective, nonoperative protocol if they were hemodynamically stable after less than 40 mL/kg fluid replacement, had proven evidence of solid organ injuries and remained stable in the pediatric intensive care unit under surgical management. RESULTS: Twenty-eight children had computed tomography (CT) or operatively proven lacerations of the spleen, 25 had lacerations of the liver, 18 had lacerations of the kidney, 7 had lacerations of the pancreas, and 11 had two or more solid organ injuries. Three of the 28 children with injured spleens required laparotomy (two splenectomy, one splenorrhaphy). Two of the 25 children with liver injuries required laparotomy (one suturing, one partial resection). One of the 18 children with kidney injuries required laparotomy (nephrectomy), and 3 of the 7 children with pancreas injuries required laparotomy (two resection, one pseudocyst). There were three deaths after laparotomy (two head, one chest/abdominal). There were no deaths in the children managed nonoperatively, and there were no immediate or long-range complications. CONCLUSIONS: Comparison of the authors' data with the National Pediatric Trauma Registry shows similar results. The authors believe that nonoperative management of solid organ injuries under careful surgical observation in a pediatric intensive care unit is safe and appropriate.     

Nonoperative management of solid organ injuries in children results in decreased blood utilization

BACKGROUND: The administration of blood products to injured children has been recognized as a potential risk of nonoperative management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate blood utilization in the management of solid organ injuries in pediatric blunt abdominal trauma victims. METHODS: One hundred sixty-one children (< or =16 years old) with solid organ injuries over an 8-year study period (1990 through 1997) were identified from the trauma registries at 2 urban regional trauma centers. RESULTS: Mean age of the study patients was 7.9+/-0.4 years, 95 (59%) were boys, and their mean injury severity score (ISS) was 17.8+/-1.2. Patients were divided into 4-year study cohorts (1990 through 1993 and 1994 through 1997) to examine changes in operative management and blood utilization. For each time period examined, those treated nonoperatively received fewer blood transfusions (46% v 9% and 44% v 13%, P<.05 by Fisher's Exact test), and the hospital length of stay was shorter (12.3+/-2.1 v 5.0+/-0.7 and 7.8+/-1.9 v 4.2+/-0.4 days, P<.0001 by analysis of variance/Scheffe's) compared with the laparotomy cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The appropriate nonoperative management of injured children actually reduces the risks of receiving blood transfusion and decreases the length of hospital stay compared with aggressive operative intervention. Blood transfusion should be reserved only for those injured children with solid organ injuries who are hemodynamically unstable.     

Nonoperative management of solid abdominal organ injuries from blunt trauma: impact of neurologic impairment

The role of nonoperative management of solid abdominal organ injury from blunt trauma in neurologically impaired patients has been questioned. A statewide trauma registry was reviewed from January 1993 through December 1995 for all adult (age >12 years) patients with blunt trauma and an abdominal solid organ injury (kidney, liver, or spleen) of Abbreviated Injury Scale score > or =2. Patients with initial hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) were excluded. Patients were stratified by Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) into normal (GCS 15), mild to moderate (GCS 8-14), and severe (GCS < or =7) impairment groups. Management was either operative or nonoperative; failure of nonoperative management was defined as requiring laparotomy for intraabdominal injury more than 24 hours after admission. In the 3-year period 2327 patients sustained solid viscus injuries; 1561 of these patients were managed nonoperatively (66 per cent). The nonoperative approach was initiated less frequently in those patients with greater impairment in mental status: GCS 15, 71 per cent; GCS 8 to 14, 62 per cent; and GCS < or =7, 50 per cent. Mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit days were greater in operatively managed GCS 15 and 8 to 14 groups but were not different on the basis of management in the GCS < or =7 group. Failure of nonoperative management occurred in 94 patients (6%). There was no difference in the nonoperative failure rate between patients with normal mental status and those with mild to moderate or severe head injuries. Nonoperative management of neurologically impaired hemodynamically stable patients with blunt injuries of liver, spleen, or kidney is commonly practiced and is successful in more than 90 per cent of cases. No differences were noted in the rates of delayed laparotomy or survival between normal, mild to moderately head-injured, and severely head-injured patients.     

Back schools. Past, present, and future

Back schools are playing an ever increasing role in the nonsurgical management of patients with low back pain. With different studies reporting that from 50% to 85% of adults seek medical attention for low back pain, there is a need for increasingly effective treatment and rehabilitative programs. The multiple factors that determine a patient's symptom complex are ill defined. The commonly applied therapeutic approaches are not well understood and have been difficult to evaluate. Back schools appear to be empirically effective but are still being critically evaluated.     

Past, present, and future aspects of histocompatibility.

We have stressed problems attendant on studies of the MHC, ignoring non-HLA factors and their role in allograft immunity. Many other topics could have been chosen for discussion is any such overview; our selection reflects our own interests. We felt assured, however, that excellent coverage by our many colleagues of the diverse and varied aspects of histocompatibility not approached in this summary has allowed us this freedom.     

Partial left ventriculectomy. Past,present and future

Although discouraging clinical results and a lack of scientific evidence decreased the initial interest in partial left ventriculectomy (PLV), factors contributing to its success and failure have now been identified by clinical observation, theoretical analyses, and data from an international registry, which are herein reviewed to outline the current status and future role of this procedure as a treatment for heart failure. Based on the same concept, new and less-invasive approaches are now being developed to reduce the diameter of the left ventricle. While PLV has been practically abandoned, these experimental approaches appear promising because they can be applied for many more patients with better cardiac condition and preserved myocardial viability, factors associated with benefits of cardiac volume reduction.     

Nonoperative management of splenic injuries

The traditional management of splenic trauma has undergone major revision in recent years. Given the physiological importance of the spleen, certain controversy has arisen regarding the most appropriate method of managing this type of trauma. Nonoperative therapy in children has proven to be successful not only in the case of kidney lesions but also for splenic lesions. Nonoperative management carried out in the authors' hospital on a group of 56 patients (49 adults and seven children over the age of 7 years) has proved successful in 37 cases. The success of this technique requires a well-formulated protocol, diagnostic methods (ultrasound and computed tomography), rigorous patient control in the emergency room during the initial phase (first 48 hours), the availability of a medical team if surgical intervention becomes necessary (persistent or recurrent hemorrhage), and complementary measures which facilitate the cicatrization of the splenic injury (bed rest, antibiotic therapy).     

Pharmacogenetics in solid organ transplantation: present knowledge and future perspectives

The promise of pharmacogenetics is to elucidate the inherited basis of differences between individual responses to drugs, in order to identify the right drug and dose for each patient. Genetic polymorphisms are implicated in the interindividual variability of the pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic characteristics of immunosuppressive drugs. The first pharmacogenetic trait identified was monogenic, and concerned the prototypic example of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) implicated in azathioprine metabolism. Individuals with low TPMT activity, inherited in an autosomal codominant fashion, are at risk of drug-induced myelosuppression. TPMT activity determination and DNA-based tests are now used in clinical practice. It has been also demonstrated that there is a link between the polymorphisms of the cytochrome P450 3A5, 3A4 and the multidrug resistance-1 (MDR1) genes, and the daily dose necessary to achieve adequate blood tacrolimus levels. Analysis of MDR1 haplotypes or using the association of the different genes might further improve predictions. Since genotyping methods improve rapidly, it will soon be easy to test for thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms in one assay. Present challenges are to determine the genes of interest and to validate such determination prospectively in clinical practice.     

Selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of selective nonoperative management in penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries. BACKGROUND: Nonoperative management of blunt abdominal solid organ injuries has become the standard of care. However, routine surgical exploration remains the standard practice for all penetrating solid organ injuries. The present study examines the role of nonoperative management in selected patients with penetrating injuries to abdominal solid organs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, protocol-driven study, which included all penetrating abdominal solid organ (liver, spleen, kidney) injuries admitted to a level I trauma center, over a 20-month period. Patients with hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, or an unevaluable abdomen underwent an immediate laparotomy. Patients who were hemodynamically stable and had no signs of peritonitis were selected for further CT scan evaluation. In the absence of CT scan findings suggestive of hollow viscus injury, the patients were observed with serial clinical examinations, hemoglobin levels, and white cell counts. Patients with left thoracoabdominal injuries underwent elective laparoscopy to rule out diaphragmatic injury. Outcome parameters included survival, complications, need for delayed laparotomy in observed patients, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 152 patients with 185 penetrating solid organ injuries. Gunshot wounds accounted for 70.4% and stab wounds for 29.6% of injuries. Ninety-one patients (59.9%) met the criteria for immediate operation. The remaining 61 (40.1%) patients were selected for CT scan evaluation. Forty-three patients (28.3% of all patients) with 47 solid organ injuries who had no CT scan findings suspicious of hollow viscus injury were selected for clinical observation and additional laparoscopy in 2. Four patients with a "blush" on CT scan underwent angiographic embolization of the liver. Overall, 41 patients (27.0%), including 18 cases with grade III to V injuries, were successfully managed without a laparotomy and without any abdominal complication. Overall, 28.4% of all liver, 14.9% of kidney, and 3.5% of splenic injuries were successfully managed nonoperatively. Patients with isolated solid organ injuries treated nonoperatively had a significantly shorter hospital stay than patients treated operatively, even though the former group had more severe injuries. In 3 patients with failed nonoperative management and delayed laparotomy, there were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: In the appropriate environment, selective nonoperative management of penetrating abdominal solid organ injuries has a high success rate and a low complication rate.     

Past, present, and future of pancreatic surgery

The advances in the surgical treatment of pancreatic disease in the 20th century were built on careful anatomic and physiologic studies dating to the early 1800s. Operations for neoplastic diseases developed in the 1930s by Whipple, Trimble, and others allowed pancreatic malignancies to be removed with ever increasing safety. Endocrine tumors of the pancreas were described and treated surgically. Patients with pancreatitis now have a number of surgical alternatives available for their individual circumstances. The future of surgery for pancreatic disease lies in the results of the human genome project and the fields of genomics and proteomics that resulted. The rapidity with which knowledge of gene expression is advancing owing to new technologies such as the microarray biochip is amazing. The future of pancreatic surgery is bright.     

Past, present, and future of nutritional support

Early rudimentary attempts to provide adequate nutrition by mouth, intestinal tube, and vein in order to reduce morbidity and mortality have advanced to strategies designed to maintain the integrity of the body cell mass. Technology has progressed geometrically in recent years with the development of organ-specific enteral and parenteral substrate mixtures; sophisticated assessment, delivery, and monitoring systems; and improved safety and efficacy. Nutritional support is rapidly evolving into the practice of clinical biochemistry, in which nutrient substrates will be formulated to enhance or maximize cellular function, not only under normal conditions, but under a wide variety of pathophysiologic conditions.