Prognostic factors for mortality in left colonic peritonitis: a new scoring system

Background: Perforating lesions of the colon affect a heterogeneous group of patients, often elderly, and usually present as abdominal emergencies, with high morbidity and mortality. The aims of this study were to assess the prognostic value of specific factors in patients with left colonic peritonitis and to evaluate the utility of a scoring method that allows one to define groups of patients with different mortality risks.

Study Design: Between January 1994 and December 1999, 156 patients (77 men and 79 women), with a mean (SD) age of 63.2 years (15.5 years) (range 22 to 87 years), underwent emergency operation for a distal colonic perforation. Intraoperative colonic lavage was the first choice operation and it was performed in 74 patients (47.4%). There were three alternative procedures: the Hartmann operation was performed in 69 patients (44.2%), subtotal colectomy in 9, and colostomy in 4 patients. We analyzed specific variables for their possible relation to death including gender, age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, immunocompromised status, etiology, and degree of peritonitis, preoperative organ failure, time (hours) between hospital admission and surgical intervention, and degree of temperature elevation (38°C). Univariate relations between predictors and outcomes (death) were analyzed using logistic regression. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the prognostic value of combinations of the variables. Significant factors identified in univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to define a left colonic Peritonitis Severity Score (PSS). Factors that were significant only in univariate analysis scored 2 points if present and 1 if not. Variables significant in multivariate analysis were scored from 1 to 3 points. Patients were randomly split into two groups, one to calculate the scoring system and the other to validate it.

Results: Overall postoperative mortality rate was 22.4%. Septic-related mortality was observed in 24 patients (15.4%). Age, peritonitis grade, ASA score, immunocompromised status, and ischemic colitis were significant for postoperative death in univariate analysis. But only ASA score and preoperative organ failure were significantly associated with postoperative mortality in multivariate logistic regression analysis. The PSS, as defined in this study, was related to outcomes of patients. Mortality rate increased from 0%, when PSS was 6 points (minimum possible score), to 100% in patients with a PSS of 13 (maximum possible PSS = 14).

Conclusions: Left colonic peritonitis continues to have a persistently high mortality in patients with septic complications. ASA score and preoperative organ failure are the only factors that are significantly associated with mortality in the multivariate analysis. The PSS classification may help uniformly define the mortality risk of patients with distal large bowel peritonitis, and may help to increase the comparability of studies carried out at different centers.     

Peritonitis in diverticulitis: the Bern concept

INTRODUCTION: The colon is the most frequent origine for a diffuse peritonitis and diverticular perforation is again the most common source of a spontaneous secondary peritonitis. This paper first focuses on the treatment of peritonitis and secondly on the strategies of source control in peritonitis with special emphasis on the tactics (primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann procedure with colostomy) for surgical source control. PATIENT AND METHODS: Prospective analysis of 404 patients suffering from peritonitis (11/93-2/98), treated with an uniform treatment concept including early operation, source control and extensive intraoperative lavage (20 to 30 liters) as a standard procedure. Other treatment measures were added in special indications "on demand" only. Peritonitis was graded with the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI). Tactics of source control in peritonitis due to diverticulitis were performed according to "general condition" respectively the MPI of the patient. RESULTS: The 404 patients averaged a MPI of 19 (0-35) in "local" peritonitis and a MPI of 26 (11-43) in "diffuse" peritonitis. The colon as a source of peritonitis resulted in MPI of 16 (0-33) in the case of "local" respectively 27 (11-43) in "diffuse" peritonitis. From 181 patients suffering from diverticulitis 144 needed an operation and in 78 (54%) peritonitis was present. Fourty-six percent (36) of the patients suffered from "local", 54% (42) from "diffuse" peritonitis. Resection with primary anastomosis was performed in 26% (20/78) whereas in 74% (58/78) of the patients a Hartmann procedure with colostomy was performed. The correlating MPI was 16 (0-28) vs. 23 (16-27) respectively. The analysis of complications and mortality based on the MPI showed a decent discrimination potential for primary anastomosis vs Hartmann procedure: morbidity 35% vs. 41%; reoperation 5% vs. 5%; mortality 0% vs. 14%. CONCLUSION: In case of peritonitis due to diverticulitis the treatment of peritonitis comes first. Thanks to advances in intensive care and improved anti-inflammatory care, a more conservative surgical concept nowadays is accepted. In the case of diverticulitis the MPI is helpful to choose between primary anastomosis vs. Hartmann procedure with colostomy as source control. The MPI includes the "general condition" of the patient into the tactical decision how to attain source control.     

Prognosescores bei peritonitis: Mannhehner peritonitis-index oder APACHE II ?

Scoring systems are mandatory to quantify the severity of abdominal sepsis on the basis of objective criteria. The Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) is a disease-specific score based on easy to handle clinical parameters. APACHE II is a large-scale general scoring system with acute physiological and chronic health parameters. To evaluate the prognostic value of both systems 108 patients with severe abdominal infection managed by open treatment entered a prospective study. 32 patients (29.6%) died, 23 of them due to sepsis and 9 from other causes. Both MPI and APACHE II scores correlated closely with mortality, with three and two significantly different classes, respectively. Statistical validation showed a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 16% for MPI, and 89% and 25% for the APACHE 11. ROC curves were nearly parallel for both scores. In conclusion there was no significant difference in prognostic value between the scoring systems.     

The value of 2 distinct prognosis scores in patients with peritonitis. The Mannheim Peritonitis Index versus the Apache II score

Seventy patients suffering from purulent peritonitis entered this study, 31 of them were taken in prospectively, to contrast two different prognostic scores, the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) vs. the Apache II (APS II). The MPI is shown as a prognostic index for peritonitis with high accuracy in individual prognosis. The simultaneous use of both scores, the MPI as well as the APS II, leads to a negligible improvement of prognostic accuracy. Moreover, sensitivity and specificity with the MPI are of higher accuracy than calculated with the APS II.     

Severity Scoring Systems for Prognosis and Efficacy of Polymyxin B-Immobilized Fiber Treatment for Colonic Perforation

Purpose There is no established system for predicting prognosis and evaluating the efficacy of antiseptic treatments such as polymyxin B-immobilized fiber (PMX) according to the severity of peritonitis in patients with colonic perforation. We investigated the predictive value of various severity scoring systems for survival and for the efficacy of antiseptic treatments, to identify high-risk patients. Methods We reviewed 26 consecutive patients who underwent emergency operations between 1996 and 2003 for colorectal perforation not caused by trauma or iatrogenic disease. Several severity scores, i.e., Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), and Multiple Organ Failure (MOF) were calculated and analyzed as predictive scoring systems for prognosis, survival and efficacy of PMX treatment. Results An APACHE II score of 19, a SOFA score of 8, an MPI score of 30, and an MOF score of 7 or more were significantly related to a poor prognosis. With or without PMX treatment, an APACHE II score of 15 or less, a SOFA score of 7 or less, an MPI score of 27 or less, and an MOF score of 7 or less were all related to a good prognosis. Conversely, all patients died when the severity scoring points were higher than 20 in APACHE II, higher than 12 in SOFA, and higher than 39 in MPI. When PMX treatment was given to patients with an intermediate score, no correlation between survival and its efficacy was found, except in the MOF scoring system. Conclusion These severity scoring systems can assist with the prediction of prognosis. They may also be useful for determining if PMX treatment would be unnecessary or ineffective in certain patients. However, the optimal application of PMX treatment in selected patients according to the severity scoring systems needs further investigation. This study was presented at the 104th Annual Congress of the Japan Surgical Society, Osaka, Japan, April 7–9, 2004.     

Age,microbiology and prognostic scores help to differentiate between secondary and tertiary peritonitis

Background and aims  Tertiary peritonitis is a severe persisting intra-abdominal infection and associated with high mortality. The aim was to find significant risk factors for mortality and tertiary peritonitis including the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, and a sumscore of both. Materials and methods  In this retrospective single-center cohort study, 122 patients were treated at the Surgical Department of a University Hospital. Results  Sixty-nine patients (56.6%) developed tertiary peritonitis. Nineteen patients (27.5%), who suffered from tertiary peritonitis, died in contrast to eight patients (15.1%) with secondary peritonitis (P = 0.101). Patients with tertiary peritonitis had significantly higher APACHE II (P < 0.001), MPI (P = 0.035), and combined APACHE II and MPI scores (P < 0.001) than patients with secondary peritonitis. Age (P = 0.035), fungal infections (P = 0.025), and infections with more than one microbial organism (P = 0.047) were predictive for tertiary peritonitis. Combined APACHE II and MPI scores detected tertiary peritonitis better than the MPI (P = 0.014). Detection of mortality was comparable in all evaluated prognostic scores. Conclusion  Prognostic scores besides age and fungal infections are risk factors for mortality and help to differentiate between secondary and tertiary peritonitis. The combination of prognostic scores is comparable to the APACHE II and superior compared to the MPI in regard to detection of tertiary peritonitis. Presented in part to the 19th European Congress on Surgical Infections of the Surgical Infection Society-Europe (SIS-E), Athens, Greece, May 2006.     

Ostomy in Nontraumatic Conditions: Our Experience and Review of the Literature

A number of nontraumatic acute abdomen can result in peritonitis leading to sepsis. In emergent conditions, various procedures like segmentary colectomy and/or subtotal colectomy with anastomosis, Hartmann’s procedure, transverse colectomy, and/or expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement can be performed, considering the status of the patient and the facilitaties of the institution. In our study, we examined the cases diagnosed as acute abdomen without the history of trauma, which had lead to a procedure requiring colostomy. We retrospectively analysed 105 cases of nontraumatic acute abdomen, resulted in a procedure requiring colostomy. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scoring and Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) were used in the evaluation of the risk of mortality and morbidity. There were colonic perforations of rectosigmoid tumor in 66 cases (62.8 %), sigmoid volvulus in 10 cases (9.5 %), colonic anastomotic leakage in 9 cases (8.5 %), intestinal adhesions in 8 cases (7.6 %), mesenteric ischemia in 5 cases (4.7 %), gynecological diseases in 3 cases (2.85 %), strangulated hernias in 3 (2.85 %), and Ogilvie syndrome in 1 case (0.95 %). Rate of morbidity was found to be 25.7 %, while mortality occurred in 2.8 % of the cases. Cases with mortality and morbidity had ASA scores above two and MPI scores above 23. Anastomotic leakage was the only reason of mortality. In nontraumatic occasions, the management and prognosis of cases with peritonitis, general status of the patients play major roles. The prognosis rates of morbidity and mortality can be highly predicted when ASA and MPI scores are evaluated together.     

Non-traumatic colorectal perforations.

Over a 6 year period, between January 1992 and December 1997, 30 patients with non-traumatic colorectal perforations undergoing laparotomy were reviewed. The aim of this study was to evaluate predictions on the prognosis using the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) and to evaluate the risk of this complication. The mean age of the patients was 56.4 years (range 16-88 years). The male:female ratio was 19:11. All patients showed signs of peritonitis and underwent emergency operations. In 50% (15) of the patients, tumor was the cause. According to the MPI scoring, there were 18 patients with an MPI score of 26 or less and 12 patients with an MPI score of 27 or more. For patients with a score less than 27 the mortality rate was zero (0/18) and for score greater than 26, 66.6% (8/12). Overall mortality was 26.6% (8/30). Of 15 patients with perforated colorectal cancers, four patients died (26.6%). The mortality rate for benign perforations was 26.6% (4/15) also. In conclusion, colorectal cancers are the most common cause of the non-traumatic colorectal perforations. Patients with an MPI score greater than 26 represent the highest risk group.     

Valuation on prognostic factors about secondary acute peritonitis: review of 255 cases

Despite advances in diagnosis, surgical treatment, antimicrobial therapy and intensive care support, severe secondary peritonitis remains a potentially fatal affliction. The purpose of this study is to present our experience of postoperative mortality in 255 patients with secondary acute peritonitis between 1998 to 2002. The Mannhein Peritonitis Index score (MPI) was calculated for each patient to predict the peritonitis related in-hospital death. Both literature reviews and our results show a strong correlation between some etiopathogenetic elements (age, origin of sepsis, organ failure, ...) and prognosis. Our patients were classified in three groups according to MPI, one with a score less than 21, another with a score between 21 and 29 and the third one with a score greater than 29. There was no mortality in the first group and there was significantly less mortality in the second group than the third one (P<0.001). While prognosis is influenced by many factors, the intervention time was the same, greater than 24 hours, for all the patients regardless of MPI score. This study suggests that intervention time may be considered the main determinant of mortality in patients with peritonitis. This observation is especially relevant since intervention time is a modifiable prognostic factor whilst many other factors are not.     

Carotid artery stenosis: does the world wide web provide sufficient information to these patients?

As the use of the Internet is at its highest at present, it is reasonable to assume that patients suffering from carotid artery stenosis and its complications may use this as a potential source of information prior to hospital attendance. The relevant Web sites were initially identified and the quality of information therein was assessed independently by two assessors on the author panel. We also tested whether established Web site scoring systems (HON and DISCERN score) could predict the quality of information included on the medical Web sites. The overall quality of relevant information for these patients was found to be poor. The Spearman rank correlation between the two scoring systems was /0.64 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.74, p < .0001). There was a good correlation between the assessors' scores for each scoring system, with a Spearman rank correlation for the DISCERN score of 0.99 (95% CI 0.99-0.99, p < .0001) and for the HON score of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.98, p < .0001). We also found a good correlation between these scores and guidelines set by the assessors. Available scoring systems provide a good means of assessment. However, significant improvement is required to enhance the overall quality of health-related Web sites.     

Surgical treatment of perforated diverticular disease: evaluation of factors predicting prognosis in the elderly

Diverticulitis free perforation carries a high mortality rate in the elderly, and this motivates the search for specific prognostic factors. The aim of this study was to assess prognostic factors in patients over 70 years of age that were operated on for generalized peritonitis caused by perforated colonic diverticulitis. A retrospective study in 22 patients was performed: demographic data, American Society of Anaesthesiology grading, site and diameter, degree of perforation according to Hinchey's classification, duration of symptoms, Manheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) score, and surgical treatment were evaluated. Patients over 70 years of age were grouped in deceased and not deceased. In this subgroup, postoperative mortality rate was 40%, and diameter of perforation, duration of symptoms, and MPI score seemed significantly related to postoperative death. In the elderly, prognosis is strongly related to duration of symptoms, and treatment delay is caused by late hospitalization because of a low sensibility to the disease symptoms in old people.     

Peritonitis: main reason of severe sepsis in surgical intensive care

INTRODUCTION: Aim of the study was to determine the epidemiology of sepsis in an university surgical intensive care unit. We were mainly interested in getting information about incidence, reason and clinical course of peritonitis. The results should give more information about diagnostic and therapy of sepsis in the surgical intensive care. METHODS: We analyzed our 2 676 ICU-patients from 2000 to 2002 with infection as main diagnosis. By means of medical report we analyzed the kind of infection and the clinical course of 561 (21 %) patients. For 356 (13.3 %) patients with peritonitis we observed the kind, the reason and the severity of infection and further the special events in the clinical course. RESULTS: The incidence of severe sepsis was 14.8 %. With 63 % the peritonitis is the main infectiological diagnosis on admission to ICU. 33.8 % of infections are hospital acquired. 71.3 % of patients with peritonitis developed a severe sepsis or septic shock during the clinical course. On average 4.7 further abdominal surgical interventions and 5.1 new occurring nosocomial infections marked a difficult surgical and infectious treatment course. Hospital acquired infections (70 %), high value of scoring and inadequate surgical treatment (23.7 %) have proved to be a good prognostic instrument for the development of tertiary peritonitis. With a share of 17 % from patients with peritonitis and a mortality of 35 % they have a strong influence on the ICU-mortality. CONCLUSION: Peritonitis is the main reason of severe sepsis on the surgical ICU. Hospital acquired infections especially the tertiary peritonitis have the highest mortality. High mortality is the consequence from the large number of difficult clinical courses and high rates of severe sepsis and septic shock. "Second hits" play a crucial role for the therapy and the prognosis of these patients. To decline the mortality future studies must more consider the problem of hospital acquired and tertiary abdominal infections.     

Evaluation of prosthetic mesh closure in semiopen-abdomen patients

Abstract Background. To avoid the adverse consequences of abdominal compartment syndrome and to reduce the high mortality the celiotomy wound in patients with abdominal sepsis was closed without tension using prosthetic mesh. This produces a semiopen situation that permits staged reinterventions together with the functional reconstitution of the continuity of the abdominal wall. Material and Methods. Twenty-five patients with intra-abdominal sepsis of various causes were evaluated retrospectively to assess the results of semiopen management of the septic abdomen and reoperations on demand in severe peritonitis. All of the patients were in a state of neglected peritonitis, and had at least one failing organ system. The Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI) scoring system was used for stratification of abdominal sepsis. Results. The mean MPI score of 25 patients was 24, ranging 10 to 33. Eight (32%) patients were reexplored (MPI=21). There were overall 9 (36%) complications in patients with mean MPI score of 23. Six (24%) mesh-related complications (infection and enterocutaneous fistulas) developed (MPI=19). The mean MPI score of patients without complications was 24. Four (16%) patients died with index MPI score of 26 due to fulminant hepatitis, myocardial infarction, and multiple organ failure. The admission period averaged 63 days. Conclusions. In 25 critically ill patients with abdominal sepsis the mortality was lower than expected, relative to heterogeneous data from the literature; also, major complications occurred less frequently although the mean MPI score was high. The authors conclude that this approach is a reliable contribution to the complex treatment of these patients. Electronic Publication     

Secondary peritonitis: severity of disease and activation of peritoneal cells.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the degree of the inflammatory response of human peritoneum with the severity of peritonitis. DESIGN: Clinical laboratory study. SETTING: University hospital, Germany. SUBJECTS: 15 patients with diffuse secondary peritonitis and 5 having conventional cholecystectomy (controls) had peritoneal specimens taken from the site of incision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Correlation between presence of indicators of the inflammatory response: interleukin 1 (IL-1), interleukin 6 (IL-6), intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), antibacterial protein (defensin 3 reflecting the activation of granulocytes), the antibody clone HAM 56 (for detection of local macrophages), and antibodies against macrophage migration inhibiting factor (MIF)-related proteins 8 and 14 (MRP 8 and 14), and clinical state evaluated by the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), the Peritonitis Index Altona II (PIA II) and the Acute Physiology Score (APS). C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were measured preoperatively in the serum. RESULTS: Expression of MRP 8 and 14, HAM 56, and defensin 3 was significantly higher in patients with peritonitis than in controls (p < 0.05). Expression of IL-1 and IL-6 was almost undetectable. ICAM-1 expression correlated significantly with phagocytic activation. There was no correlation between clinical scores, CRP, and immunohistochemically detectable variables. CONCLUSION: The pattern of peritoneal inflammatory reactions is relatively uniform and does not correlate with the clinical grading of severity.     

Identification of Patients at Risk for Development of Tertiary Peritonitis on a Surgical Intensive Care Unit

Background  Tertiary peritonitis (TP) is defined as a severe recurrent or persistent intra-abdominal infection after adequate surgical source control of secondary peritonitis (SP). The aim of this study was to analyze the characteristics of patients with SP who will further develop TP in order to define early diagnostic markers for TP. Study Design  Over a 1-year period, all patients on the surgical intensive care unit (ICU) with SP were prospectively assessed for the development of TP applying the definition of the ICU consensus conference. The Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) were assessed at the initial operation (IO) that was diagnostic for SP and in the postoperative period. Results  Among 69 patients with SP, 15 patients further developed TP, whereas 54 patients did not develop TP. Compared to SP, patients with transition to TP had significantly higher MPI at IO (28.6 vs. 19.8; p < 0.001), relaparotomy rate (2.00 vs. 0.11; p < 0.001), mortality (60% vs. 9%; p < 0.001), duration of ICU stay (14 vs. 4 days; p < 0.005), as well as SAPS II (45.1 vs. 28.4; p < 0.005) and CRP (265 mg/dL vs. 217 mg/dL; p < 0.05) on the second postoperative day after IO. Conclusions  The MPI at IO as well as CRP and SAPS II at the second postoperative day helps to identify patients at risk for tertiary peritonitis. This paper was presented by the principal author (A.M. Chromik) at the “Papers Session GS71 Trauma and Critical Care” of the 94th Annual Clinical Congress of the American College of Surgeons, October 12–16, 2008, San Francisco, (Abstract # NP2008-1246). Ansgar M. Chromik and Andreas Meiser contributed equally to this publication.     

APACHE-II scoring system in perforative peritonitis

BACKGROUND: Prospective assessment of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II (APACHE-II) scoring system of stratification of disease severity has been shown to provide objective discrimination between low-risk and high-risk groups of patients with intra-abdominal sepsis. The current study was undertaken to evaluate the performance of APACHE-II score in prediction of mortality risk in patients with peritonitis due to hollow viscus perforation. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty patients admitted to a teaching hospital with peritonitis due to hollow viscus perforation were prospectively studied over a 2-year period. APACHE-II points were assigned to all patients in order to calculate their individual risk of mortality before undergoing emergency surgery. The accuracy in outcome prediction of the APACHE-II system was assessed by means of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the Pearson correlation coefficient and its significance test. RESULTS: Of the 50 patients admitted during the study period, there were 42 (84%) survivors and 8 (16%) nonsurvivors. Mean APACHE-II score of the study population was 11.38 with a range of 1 to 23. The predicted death rate was 23% and the observed death rate was 16%. Mean APACHE-II score in survivors was 9.88, whereas in nonsurvivors it was 19.25. Using ROC analysis, the area under the curve was found to be .984. Correlation of APACHE-II score and predicted death rate showed perfect correlation, with r = .99 and P <.001 [R2 = .9993]. APACHE-II score between 11 and 15 showed a sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 73.8%, respectively, and APACHE-II score of 16 to 20 had a sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: APACHE-II score between 11 and 20 was shown to be a better predictor of risk of mortality in patients with peritonitis due to hollow viscus perforation. Predicted mortality did not correlate with observed mortality in patients with APACHE-II scores of 1 to 10 and greater than 20. The APACHE-II scoring system can be used to assess group outcomes in patients with peritonitis due to hollow viscus perforation. However, it does not provide sufficient confidence for outcome prediction in individual patients.     

Peritonitis – the Eastern experience

Peritonitis is a common emergency encountered by surgeons the world over. This paper aims to provide an overview of the spectrum of peritonitis seen in the East. Studies dealing with the overall spectrum of secondary peritonitis in various countries of this region were identified using Pubmed and Google. These were analyzed for the site and cause of perforation and the mortality. It was observed that perforation of duodenal ulcers was the most the commonly encountered perforations. These are followed by small bowel and appendicular perforations. Colonic perforations were uncommon. The overall mortality ranges between 6–27%.     

The immune system status in patients with thrombohemorrhagic syndrome caused by peritonitis

The changes of immune system were studied in patients, suffering thrombohemorrhagic syndrome (THS), occurred in environment of peritonitis of various severity. A Mannheim's Peritonitis Index (MPI), based on calculation of a point's sum, providing the patient's state characterization, was used for the peritonitis severity estimation. In MPI lesser than 20 points a first degree peritonitis was diagnosed, in a range of 20-30 points--a second degree and more than 30 points--a third degree. The immunogram indices were analyzed in 120 patients, suffering THC with peritonitis. Disorders of cellular and humoral parts of immunity are mostly expressed in patients with THS and peritonitis of II-III degrees (according to MPI). The immunogram changes revealed have served as a background for incorporation of immunomodulating therapy to the complex program of treatment in such patients.     

Peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis in children living in Saudi Arabia

The clinical aspects of peritonitis and catheter infections were reviewed in 64 children on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis living in Saudi Arabia over a period of 6 years. Peritonitis occurred in 41 children (64%). The mean time from starting dialysis to the first episode of peritonitis was 7.2 months. The incidence of peritonitis was 1 episode in 9 treatment months. Gram-negative organisms were responsible for the majority of episodes (42%), followed by Gram-positive organisms (20%), and Candida albicans (6%); 32% were culture negative. Recurrent peritonitis was present in 20 cases. Catheter was replaced in 24 patients: 44% due to recurrent peritonitis. Peritoneal membrane loss occurred in 7 patients, 3 had Candida peritonitis and 3 had recurrent peritonitis due to Pseudomonas. The mortality rate was 4.6% but none of the deaths were related to peritonitis or dialysis. Received August 23, 1995; received in revised form October 2, 1996; accepted October 18, 1996     

Surgical management of severe peritonitis

Despite all the efforts made in the areas of intensive care and surgery, severe peritonitis remains a feared condition that is associated with a high mortality rate. Severe abdominal infections are accompanied with a high level of endotoxin production, resulting in the so called systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), which is often complicated by multiple organ failure. The surgical eradication of the infectious focus is the most important prerequisite for a successful treatment. According to the severity of the local inflammation, different forms of abdominal lavage can be applied. We analysed patient characteristics and the clinical outcome of 180 patients with diffuse peritonitis, including 36 patients with more than 29 MPI-Points. The mean severity of peritonitis (n = 36) was 33 using the Mannheim Peritonitis Index (MPI). The hospital mortality rate was 58 % in this group.