Blunt gastric injuries

Gastric rupture after blunt abdominal trauma is a rare injury with few reports in the literature. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with blunt gastric injuries and compare outcomes with small bowel or colon injuries. All patients with hollow viscus perforations after blunt abdominal trauma from 1992 to 2005 at our level I trauma center were reviewed. Of 35,033 blunt trauma admissions, there were 268 (0.7%) patients with a total of 319 perforating hollow viscus injuries, 25 (0.07%) of which were blunt gastric injuries. When compared with the small bowel or colon injuries, the blunt gastric injury group had a higher Injury Severity Score (22 versus 17, P = 0.04), more patients with a chest Abbreviated Injury Score greater than 2 (36% versus 12%, P < 0.01), and a shorter interval from injury to laparotomy (221 versus 366 minutes, P = 0.017). Multivariate analysis identified five independent risk factors for mortality: age older than 55 years, head Abbreviated Injury Score greater than 2, chest Abbreviated Injury Score greater than 2, the presence of hypotension on admission, and Glasgow Coma Scale 8 or less. The results of this study suggest that mortality in patients with blunt hollow viscus injuries can be attributed to concurrent head and chest injuries, but not the specific hollow viscus organ that is injured.     

Alcohol and illicit drugs in traumatic deaths: prevalence and association with type and severity of injuries

BACKGROUND: My colleagues and I studied alcohol and illicit drug intoxication in trauma fatalities and their association with the nature and severity of injuries. STUDY DESIGN: We examined the trauma registry and autopsies of all trauma fatalities at an academic Level I trauma center. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the association of substance use with the Injury Severity Score, body areas with severe trauma (Abbreviated Injury Score >/= 3), and spinal injuries. RESULTS: From January 2000 to May 2003, 931 trauma deaths occurred; 600 victims were tested for alcohol and illicit drugs and 256 of these (42.7%) tested positive. Male victims were significantly more likely to have a positive screen than female patients (46.1% versus 26.7%, p = 0.0003). Penetrating trauma was significantly more likely to be associated with a positive screen than blunt trauma (53.0% versus 31.0%, p < 0.001). Hispanic and African-American victims were more likely to have a positive screen than Caucasians or Asians. Half the patients in the age group 15 to 50 years had a positive screen. Victims with penetrating trauma and positive screen were significantly more likely to be dead at hospital arrival than victims with negative toxicology (68.8% versus 48.8%, p = 0.05). Pedestrians killed by automobiles who had positive screens were more likely to have severe abdominal trauma (Abbreviated Injury Score >/= 3) than victims with negative toxicology (54.2% versus 25.0%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: There is a high rate of alcohol and illicit drug use in patients who die from trauma, especially penetrating trauma in men aged 15 to 50 years, who are Hispanic or African American. Victims with penetrating trauma and positive toxicology are considerably more likely to have no vital signs on admission than victims with negative toxicology. Pedestrians killed by automobiles who had positive screens have a higher incidence of severe abdominal injuries than victims with negative screens.     

High-level falls: type and severity of injuries and survival outcome according to age

BACKGROUND: High-level falls are associated with multiple injuries and are often difficult to evaluate. Age may be an important factor determining the anatomic distribution and severity of injuries and outcome. There is little work published on this subject. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of age on the incidence and severity of specific organ injuries and survival outcome after high-level falls. METHODS: This was a trauma registry study that included all victims of high-level falls (>15 feet) admitted to a Level I academic trauma center. The incidence of severe trauma (Injury Severity Score > 15), severe body area trauma (head, chest, abdomen, and extremities) with Abbreviated Injury Scale score > 3, specific organ injuries (spine, thoracic aorta, solid and hollow viscus intra-abdominal injuries, and pelvic and lower extremity fractures), and mortality were compared in four age groups: < or =14 years, 15 to 55 years, 56 to 65 years, and >65 years. RESULTS: The study included 1,613 patients. There were 128 patients (7.9%) in the age group < or =14 years, 1,389 (86.1%) in the age group 15 to 55 years, 59 (3.7%) in the age group 56 to 65 years, and 37 (2.3%) in the age group >65 years. The mortality ranged from 5.5% in the pediatric group to 24.3% in the elderly group (p = 0.02). Significantly more patients in the elderly group had an Injury Severity Score > 15 than in the pediatric group (45.2% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.001). The overall incidence of spinal fractures was 24.1% (392 cases) and increased significantly after the age of 15 years. Elderly patients were significantly more likely than pediatric patients to suffer pelvic fractures (21.6% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.0001) and more likely to have fractures of the femur (18.9% vs. 3.9%, p = 0.006). The nature of intracranial injuries and the incidence of solid and hollow viscus injuries were similar in all age groups. CONCLUSION: Age is an important variable in determining the nature and severity of injuries after high-level falls. Spinal injuries are very common in all age groups older than 14 years.     

Withholding/withdrawal of life support in trauma patients: is there an age bias?

Our objective was to examine patterns of withholding/withdrawal (WH/WD) of life support in trauma patients and to determine whether WD/WH of life support is used more frequently in elderly patients. This is a retrospective cohort study of injured elderly (> or = 65 years) and young patients (< 65 years) from 1994 through 1998 treated at a surgical intensive care unit in a community tertiary-care hospital. We studied the cases of 82 patients (30 elderly and 52 young patients) with WH/WD of life support after injury. Our main outcome measures were demographic and clinical characteristics of elderly and young patients undergoing WH/WD of life support after injury with an association between age and WH/WD of life support. Of 102 total trauma patient deaths 82 had WH/WD of life support. This mode was chosen in 52 (80%) patients under the age of 65 and in 30 (81%) patients age 65 or greater. Patients in the younger cohort had a higher mean Injury Severity Score and Abbreviated Injury Score of 5 (P < 0.05). The elderly cohort had a higher incidence of pre-existing disease (< 0.001). Length of stay was similar between the populations. We conclude that the elderly were no more likely to have WH/WD of life support than were younger patients. However, the older patients were less severely injured as measured by Injury Severity Score and percentage with Abbreviated Injury Score head of 5. Other factors such as the presence of pre-existing disease may influence the decision to withhold or withdraw life support to a greater degree than the actual severity of injuries.     

Liver cirrhosis in patients undergoing laparotomy for trauma: effect on outcomes

BACKGROUND: There is little published work on the effect of cirrhosis on outcomes in trauma patients undergoing laparotomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of death or serious complications in cirrhotic trauma patients undergoing laparotomy as compared with that in a similar group of patients without cirrhosis. STUDY DESIGN: During a 12-year period, there were 46 patients with the diagnosis of liver cirrhosis made during laparotomy for trauma. Each patient was matched with two noncirrhotic controls on the basis of 7 criteria: age (>55, 25), head Abbreviated Injury Score (<3, >/=3), chest Abbreviated Injury Score (<3, >/=3), and abdominal Abbreviated Injury Score (<3, >/=3). Six cirrhotic patients were excluded because matching was not possible. The remaining 40 patients were matched with 80 noncirrhotic control patients selected from a pool of 4,771 patients who had trauma laparotomies. Outcomes included mortality, ARDS, pneumonia, renal failure, abdominal sepsis, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, ICU and hospital stay, and hospital charges. Outcomes between the two study groups were compared with conditional logistic analysis. Hazard ratio (95% CI) and adjusted p value with the stepdown Bonferroni method were derived. RESULTS: The overall mortality in the cirrhotic group was significantly higher than that in the matched noncirrhotic group (45% versus 24%, hazard ratio: 7.60 [2.00, 28.94], p = 0.021). Mortality in patients with Injury Severity Score 相似文献   

Time from injury to death (survival time) among fatally injured pedestrians

This study examines the survival time after injury and its relationship to age and Injury Severity Score (ISS) among 322 fatally injured pedestrians. Long survival times were associated with older age and with lower ISS. The association of long survival time with older ages remained present after adjustment for ISS. People with untreatable severe injuries (as defined by the Abbreviated Injury Scale) and people who died of potentially survivable injuries had markedly different survival times. Therefore, in analyses of data relating to survival time, combining the two groups should be avoided.     

Major trauma with multiple injuries in German children: a retrospective review

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the demographics, mechanisms, pattern, injury severity, and the outcome (ie, length of intensive care unit [ICU] stay, length of mechanical ventilation, total length of stay, mortality) in multiple-injured children based on a review from the German trauma registry study ("Traumaregister") of the German Society of Trauma Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie e.V.). METHODS: One hundred three German trauma centers took part in the German trauma registry study from January 1997 to December 2003. Five hundred seventeen children (aged 0-15 years) with multiple injuries and an Injury Severity Score of more than 15 in comparison to 11,025 adults were included. Sex, age, and mechanisms and pattern of injury were assessed. The mechanisms of trauma and the anatomical distribution of severe injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale of 3 or more) were analyzed. The Injury Severity Score, the Revised Trauma Score, and the Trauma Score Injury Severity Score were calculated to estimate the severity of injury and mortality. RESULTS: The predominant sex was male. Most cases were caused by traffic-related accidents. Head injuries were most common in children, and severe thoracic injuries increased with age. Mean length of ICU treatment, mechanical ventilation, and total length of stay were shorter in children than in adults. A total of 22.6% of the children aged 0 to 5 years died in the hospital in comparison with in-hospital mortality rate of 13.7% in the 6- to 10-, 20.3% in the 11- to 15-, and 17.0% in the 16- to 55-year-old patients. CONCLUSIONS: There were differences between multiple-injured children and adults concerning injury mechanisms and pattern of injuries. Adults needed a longer mechanical ventilation and a longer ICU therapy. Most deaths could be seen in the youngest patients aged 0 to 5 years.     

A simple fall in the elderly: not so simple

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to evaluate the burden of falls in the elderly in a Canadian tertiary trauma center. METHODS: Patients admitted to Charles-LeMoyne Hospital with a low velocity fall (LVF) from April 1, 1993 to March 31, 2000 were individually reviewed. Elderly was defined as age 65 years and older. A region was considered to be injured if Abbreviated Injury Scale was greater than or equal to 2. RESULTS: There were 2,333 patients with LVF, 41.4% of all blunt trauma admissions. Median Injury Severity Score was 9 for elderly compared with 5 for young (p < 0.001). Injuries were significantly more frequent to head, face, thorax, and lower limbs in the elderly. Mortality (13.4% versus 0.9%; p < 0.001), length of stay (median = 15 versus 3 days; p < 0.001) and long-term care facility reference (19.3% versus 1.1%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the elderly. CONCLUSIONS: LVF is a frequent cause of admission for trauma in the elderly. Despite the apparent benign nature of the mechanism, LVF is associated with more severe injuries and worse outcome.     

Determinants of hospital costs associated with traumatic brain injury in England and Wales

Using data from the Trauma Audit Research Network, we investigated the costs of acute care in patients > or = 18 years of age hospitalised for traumatic brain injury between January 2000 and December 2005 in England and Wales. Traumatic brain injury patients were defined and stratified using the Abbreviated Injury Scale. A total of 6484 traumatic brain injury patients were identified; 22.3% had an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of three, 38.0% of four and 39.7% of five. Median age (IQR) was 42 years (28-59) and 76.7% were men. Primary cause of injury was motor vehicle collisions (42.4%) followed by falls (38.0%). In total 23.7% of the patients died before discharge. Hospitalisation costs averaged 15,462 pounds sterling (SD 16,844 pounds sterling). Costs varied significantly by age, Glasgow Coma Score, Injury Severity Score, coexisting injuries of the thorax, spine and lower limb, hospital mortality, availability of neurosurgical services, and specialty of attendants seen in the Accident and Emergency department.     

Pelvic fractures in pediatric and adult trauma patients: are they different injuries?

BACKGROUND: Many aspects of pediatric trauma are considerably different from adult trauma. Very few studies have performed comprehensive comparisons between pediatric and adult pelvic fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of pelvic fracture, the epidemiologic characteristics, type of associated abdominal injuries, and outcomes between pediatric (age 16 years) patients. METHODS: This was a trauma registry study that included all blunt trauma admissions at a Level I trauma center during an 8-year period. The incidence and severity of pelvic fractures, associated abdominal injuries, need for blood transfusion, and mortality in the two age groups were compared with the two-sided Fisher's exact test. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for associated abdominal injuries in pelvic fractures in the two age groups. RESULTS: The incidence of pelvic fractures was 10.0% (1,450 of 14,568) in the adult group and 4.6% (95 of 2,062) in the pediatric group (p < 0.0001). In motor vehicle and pedestrian injuries, adults were twice as likely and in falls from heights > 15 ft seven times as likely as children to suffer pelvic fractures. However, age group was not a significant predictor of the severity of pelvic fracture. Only 9.5% of pediatric fractures and 8.8% of adult fractures had a pelvis Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score >/= 4. The incidence of associated abdominal injuries was high but similar in the two age groups (16.7% in adults and 13.7% in children, p = 0.48). Motor vehicle crash, pelvis AIS score >/= 4, and fall from height > 15 ft were significant predictors of associated abdominal injuries in the adult but not the pediatric group. The incidence of associated gastrointestinal injuries was similar in the two age groups (5.3% in children and 3.3% in adults, p = 0.37). The incidence of solid organ injuries was nearly identical in both groups (11.6% in children and 11.5% in adults). The need for blood transfusions and angiographic intervention was not significantly different between the two age groups. Exsanguination because of bleeding related to the pelvic fracture was responsible or possibly responsible in 42 deaths (2.9%) in the adult group and no deaths in the pediatric group. CONCLUSION: Pediatric trauma patients are significantly less likely than adults to suffer pelvic fractures, although the age group is not a significant risk factor for the severity of pelvic fracture. The incidence of associated abdominal injuries is high and similar in the two age groups. Motor vehicle crash, fall from a height, and pelvis AIS score >/= 4 were significant predictors of associated abdominal injuries in the adult but not the pediatric patients. The need for blood transfusion is similar in both groups irrespective of Injury Severity Score and pelvis AIS score. The mortality resulting from exsanguination related to pelvic fractures is very low, especially in pediatric patients.     

Functional outcome of pediatric trauma patients identified as 'non-salvageable survivors'

A retrospective study of 305 pediatric trauma patients seen over 17 months was undertaken to evaluate the functional outcome of patients categorized as "non-salvageable survivors" (NSS). Functional outcome was determined by Denver Developmental Screen Tests (DDST) for children less than 5 years of age and Rappaport Severity Rating Scale (RDRS) for those 5 years old and older. Each patient was assigned Abbreviated Injury Scores (AIS). Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), and Trauma Score (TS). The total number of patients classified as severe was 65 (21%), and 13 were classified as non-salvageable, with seven non-salvageable survivors and six non-preventable deaths. Our study suggests that current trauma scoring systems tend to overestimate the non-salvageable population. Those identified as non-salvageable and who survived have a high probability of meaningful functional recovery. Current trauma scoring systems are in need of revision to better identify non-salvageable survivors and those children who will not make a meaningful neurologic recovery.     

Gender-related outcomes in trauma

BACKGROUND: Recent data suggest that sex hormones may play a role in regulating posttraumatic immunosuppression, leading to gender-based differences in outcome after injuries. This study examined gender-related outcomes in trauma patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of trauma registry data from our Level I trauma center over a 4-year period. Patients > 15 years of age, with Injury Severity Scores > 15, who survived and received mechanical ventilation for > 48 hours were included. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of age (15-45 years and > 45 years) and the groups were further stratified by gender. Groups were matched by Injury Severity Scores, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Abbreviated Injury Score for the head, and transfusion requirement. Gender-based outcomes consisted of ventilator days, intensive care unit length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, pneumonia, and death. RESULTS: Data were reported as mean +/- SD. There were 612 patients. In the younger age group, male patients had a higher incidence of multiple organ failure (10.5% vs. 1.5%), longer intensive care unit (13.5 +/- 9.2 days vs. 9.2 +/- 7.2 days) and hospital LOS (30.2 +/- 37.7 days vs. 18.9 +/- 13.0 days), and higher mortality (13.4% vs. 6.8%) compared with female patients (p < 0.05 for all). These differences did not exist in the older age group. The incidence of pneumonia did not differ by gender. Age > 45 years was associated with higher mortality (odds ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-3.5). CONCLUSION: Although the incidence of pneumonia was not influenced by gender, female trauma patients had better outcomes than male patients in the younger age group. Outcome in the older age group was not gender-related. Our data support a gender-based difference in outcome after traumatic injuries in younger patients.     

Severe and multiple trauma in older patients; incidence and mortality

Objective

To examine the differences between severely injured older patients (aged over 65 years) compared with similarly injured younger adults in terms of incidence, inpatient mortality and factors predicting outcome.

Methods

Data prospectively entered into the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database from our level I trauma unit over a 5-year period were retrospectively examined, with 3172 patients included in the final analysis.

Results

Older patients accounted for 13.8% of those with severe injuries (Injury Severity Score 16 or more) and almost 2% of our trauma admissions overall. High energy injuries were responsible for the majority of these injuries though relatively minor trauma became increasingly important in older patients. Mortality rates in the older patients were more than twice those seen in the adult population (19% in the under 40's to almost 50% in the over 75's). Age, Injury Severity Score and Glasgow Coma Score continued to be predictive of mortality in older patients but other factors relevant in younger adults were not.

Conclusions

Patients in the older group without physiological derangement on admission were still at a relatively high risk of inpatient mortality. This was in contrast to the younger patients, suggesting that it might be more difficult to predict which older patients might benefit from more aggressive monitoring or treatment. Despite increased mortality in older patients, significant survival rates were achieved even in the oldest. Active treatment should not be withdrawn on the basis of age alone.     

The current status of road user injuries among the elderly in Germany: a medical and technical accident analysis

BACKGROUND: The incidence and treatment of injuries involving the elderly road user are of increasing importance for all fields of trauma care to ensure the best possible outcomes. METHODS: Traffic accident reports were analyzed through technical and medical investigation for the involvement of elderly citizens. RESULTS: In 12,309 documented traffic accidents between 1985 and 1998, 1,843 elderly citizens (65 years and older) were involved, 1,260 of which were reported to have been injured. The mean Injury Severity Score among the injured elderly citizens was 7.3. Of the injured elderly road users, 39.5% were car occupants, 27.4% were bicyclists, 29.6% were pedestrians, 1.8% were truck occupants, and 1.7% were motorcyclists. Of the elderly road users in cars, 53% were not injured, in contrast to only 1.1% of the bicyclists and 0.8% of the pedestrians. Serious or severe injuries (Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale, >/=2] occurred for 36.5% of the injured elderly road users as car occupants (unrestrained, 58%; restrained, 34%), 57.4% as bicyclists, and 65.4% as pedestrians CONCLUSION: A high rate of motor injuries is associated with vehicle accidents and increased levels of severity among the elderly population. This finding is especially evident for elder pedestrians and bicyclists. Also of note, the elderly even appear to be at risk for sustaining an increased level of injury severity when they are restrained or belt protected.     

Beta-blockers in isolated blunt head injury

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of beta-blockers on patients sustaining acute traumatic brain injury. Our hypothesis was that beta-blocker exposure is associated with improved survival. STUDY DESIGN: The trauma registry and the surgical ICU databases of an academic Level I trauma center were used to identify all patients sustaining blunt head injury requiring ICU admission from July 1998 to December 2005. Patients sustaining major associated injuries (Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 4 in any body region other than the head) were excluded. Patient demographics, injury profile, Injury Severity Score, and beta-blocker exposure were abstracted. The primary outcomes measure evaluated was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: During the 90-month study period, 1,156 patients with isolated head injury were admitted to the ICU. Of these, 203 (18%) received beta-blockers and 953 (82%) did not. Patients receiving beta-blockers were older (50 +/- 21 years versus 38 +/- 20 years, p < 0.001), had more frequent severe (Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 4) head injury (54% versus 43%, p < 0.01), Glasgow Coma Scale < or = 8 less often (37% versus 47%, p = 0.01), more skull fractures (20% versus 12%, p < 0.01), and underwent craniectomy more frequently (23% versus 4%, p < 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression identified beta-blocker use as an independent protective factor for mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 0.54; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.91; p = 0.01). On subgroup analysis, elderly patients (55 years or older) with severe head injury (Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 4) had a mortality of 28% on beta-blockers as compared with 60% when they did not receive them (odds ratio: 0.3; 96% CI, 0.1 to 0.6; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Beta-blockade in patients with traumatic brain injury was independently associated with improved survival. Older patients with severe head injuries demonstrated the largest reduction in mortality with beta-blockade.     

An appraisal of trauma in the elderly

To review the trends of trauma in the elderly experienced at our trauma center compared with other Level I trauma centers. This was a retrospective trauma registry analysis (1996-2003) of 2783 blunt trauma in elderly (BTE) and 4568 adult (BTA) patients in a Level 1 trauma center. Falls and motor vehicular crashes were the most common mechanisms noted in 47 per cent and 31 per cent (84% and 13% in BTE, 25% and 42% in BTA). BTE were sicker, with higher Injury Severity Scores (ISS), lengths of stay, and mortality (5% vs 2%, P value < 0.05). ISS was 5.2-fold higher in nonsurvivors to survivors in BTA and 2.4-fold in BTE. Elevation in ISS resulted in higher linear increase in mortality in BTE (vs BTA) at any ISS level. Mortality in patients with ISS > or = 25 was 43.5 per cent vs 23.8 per cent. ISS > or = 50 had 31 per cent adult survivors but no elderly survivors. Among isolated injuries, head trauma in the elderly carried the highest mortality, at 12 per cent (19% in patients with an Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 3). Abdominal injuries were the most lethal (18.3% and 41.2% in patients with an Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 3) in multiple trauma victims (41% vs 18% in isolated trauma). There was 4.4-fold increased mortality in the presence of thoracic trauma. Combined head, chest, and abdominal trauma carried the worst prognosis. Thirty-four per cent of BTE and 88 per cent of BTA patients were discharged home. Elderly patients need more aggressive therapy, as they are sicker with higher mortality.     

Relationship between American College of Surgeons trauma center designation and mortality in patients with severe trauma (injury severity score > 15)

BACKGROUND: We studied the association of the American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma center designation and mortality in adult patients with severe trauma (Injury Severity Score > 15). ACS designation of trauma centers into different levels requires substantial financial and human resources commitments. There is very little work published on the association of ACS trauma center designation and outcomes in severe trauma. STUDY DESIGN: National Trauma Data Bank study including all adult trauma admissions (older than 14 years of age) with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15. The relationship between ACS level of trauma designation and survival outcomes was evaluated after adjusting for age, mechanism of injury, ISS, hypotension on admission, severe liver trauma, aortic, vena cava, iliac vascular, and penetrating cardiac injuries. RESULTS: A total of 130,154 patients from 256 trauma centers met the inclusion criteria. Adjusted mortality in ACS-designated Level II centers and undesignated centers was notably higher than in Level I centers (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.09-120; p < 0.0001 and adjusted odds ratio, 1.09; CI, 1.05-1.13; p < 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Severely injured patients with ISS > 15 treated in ACS Level I trauma centers have considerably better survival outcomes than those treated in ACS Level II centers.     

Urban versus rural trauma recidivism: is there a difference?

Purpose

Understanding the characteristics of trauma recidivists may allow trauma centers to tailor prevention programs. We hypothesized that there would be an increased incidence of violent injuries and falls in the urban vs. rural recidivists, respectively.

Methods

Trauma admissions from 2000 to 2011 were queried for incidences of recidivism. Age (<65 or ≥65 years), gender, Injury Severity Score (ISS, <9 or ≥9), mortality, and injury cause (fall, violence, or other) were analyzed with univariate analyses to test for differences between urban and rural patients. Significant variables were then included in a binary logistic model and further stratified based on environment.

Results

There were a total of 19,600 trauma admissions from 2000 to 2011, representing 18,711 unique patients, with 1,690 admissions (8.6 %) attributed to 801 recidivists (4.3 %). The overall percentages of recidivist trauma admissions attributed to urban and rural patients were 8.6 and 6.9 %, respectively (p < 0.001). When adjusting for age ≥65 years as well as falls and violent injuries, patients from urban environments were at 1.12 times higher odds of being a recidivist than their rural counterparts [odds ratio (OR) 1.12; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.01–1.25; p = 0.039]. When stratified into rural and urban groups, falls and violent injuries were significant in both groups of recidivist admissions; however, age ≥65 years was only significant in rural recidivist admissions.

Conclusion

An urban trauma admission had 12 % higher odds of being attributed to a recidivist than its rural counterpart, when controlling for age and mechanism of injury (MOI). Age ≥65 years was a significant variable in rural but not urban recidivist admissions. Characterizing the recidivist may allow for targeted prevention and intervention programs to decrease repeat hospital visits.

     

A multicenter evaluation of whether gender dimorphism affects survival after trauma.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of women who have sustained severe injuries has increased over the past 30 years. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether severely injured women have a survival advantage over men. To address this issue, we undertook a multicenter evaluation of the effects of gender dimorphism on survival in trauma patients. METHODS: Patient information was collected from the databases of three level I trauma centers. We included all consecutive patients who were admitted to these centers over a 4-year period. We evaluated the effects of age, gender, mechanism of injury, pattern of injury, Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS) on survival. RESULTS: A total of 20,261 patients were admitted to the three trauma centers. Women who were younger than 50 years of age (mortality rate 5%) experienced a survival advantage over men (mortality rate 7%) of equal age (odds ratio 1.27, P <0.002). This advantage was most notably found in the more severely injured (ISS >25) group (mortality rate 28% in women versus 33% in men). This difference was not attributable to mechanism of injury, severity of injury, or pattern of injury. CONCLUSIONS: Severely injured women younger than 50 years of age have a survival advantage when compared with men of equal age and injury severity. Young men have a 27% greater chance of dying than women after trauma. We conclude that gender dimorphism affects the survival of patients after trauma.