Sleeve gastrectomy prior to liver transplantation is superior to medical weight loss in reducing posttransplant metabolic complications

Strategies to optimize the management of obesity-related metabolic complications after liver transplantation (LT) are needed. We examined the effect of pre-LT sleeve gastrectomy (SG), as compared to medical weight loss (MWL), on post-LT outcomes. This is a cohort study of adults (≥18 years) with medically complicated obesity who were eligible for pre-LT SG and underwent LT from January 1, 2006 to June 1, 2016. Logistic regression models evaluated the association of SG on post-LT diabetes and hypertension, defined as new-onset or progressive disease post-LT. Cox regression models evaluated the association of SG on recurrent and de novo nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Among 70 LT recipients who were eligible for pre-LT SG, 14 (20%) underwent SG and 56 (80%) underwent MWL only. Mean follow-up was 5.2 years post-LT. The SG cohort sustained higher % total body weight loss at 3 years post-LT (28.9% vs. 5.4%, p < .001). In multivariable analyses, SG was associated with significantly lower risk of post-LT diabetes (OR 0.04, 95% CI 0.00–0.41, p = .01), hypertension (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04–0.67, p = .01), and recurrent and de novo NAFLD (HR 0.19, 95% CI 0.04–0.91, p = .04). When compared to MWL, SG resulted in sustained weight loss and significantly lower risk of diabetes, hypertension, and recurrent and de novo NAFLD post-LT.     

Management and outcome of hepatic artery thrombosis with whole-liver transplantation using donors less than one year of age

Background/purposeThe incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) in recipients is high after pediatric LT using young donors. In this study we investigated the management and outcome of HAT after whole-LT using donors less than one year of age. And evaluate the safety of pediatric donors, and increase the utilization of pediatric donors overall.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data encompassing children who underwent whole-liver transplantation in our department from January 2014 to December 2019. Recipients receiving a liver from a donor ≥1 month and ≤12 months were included, and a total of 110 patients were included in this study.ResultsThe results showed an incidence for HAT of 20% and the median time to HAT diagnosis was 3.0 (2.0, 5.3) days post-operation. Anticoagulant therapy was used for 19 cases and 94.7% of them achieved hepatic artery recanalization or collateral formation. The median time of recanalization was 12 (5, 15) days. Bile leakage and biliary strictures occurring in the HAT group were higher than in the non HAT group (13.6% vs. 1.1% and 31.8% vs. 3.4%). There were no significant differences in the survival rates of recipients or grafts among the two groups (P = 0.474, P = 0.208, respectively).ConclusionWe confirmed that the incidence of HAT in LT recipients use donors less than 1 year is high, but recanalization can be performed using anticoagulant therapy. Although biliary complications increased significantly after HAT, the survival rates of patients and grafts were satisfactory.Level of evidenceLevel III.     

Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence in the Posttransplant Population: A Comparison of RETREAT and Cleveland Clinic Florida Scoring System

BackgroundLiver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is curative in most cases; however, recurrence is observed in some patients. The Risk Estimation of Tumor Recurrence After Transplant (RETREAT) score is an externally validated scoring system for prediction of post-LT HCC recurrence. The Cleveland Clinic Florida Scoring System (CCFSS) is a potential new scoring system for prediction of HCC recurrence. Our study aimed to compare the RETREAT and CCFSS.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of 52 adult patients with HCC who underwent LT at a tertiary care center. Mantel-Haenszel chi-square analyses were conducted to compare the RETREAT and CCFSS classifications for detecting HCC recurrence.ResultsA total of 52 patients underwent LT. The median follow-up period was 37 months. Four patients had post-LT HCC recurrence, with all recurrences occurring within 2 years of LT. The RETREAT score was better able to detect low, moderate, and high levels of risk (P < .001), compared to the CCFSS score (P = 0.480). Both risk scores had a sensitivity of 75%; the specificity of the RETREAT score was 95.8%, whereas the specificity of the CCFSS was 60.4%. Alpha-fetoprotein level at the time of LT was associated with HCC recurrence (P = .014).ConclusionsThis is the first study to evaluate the CCFSS as a potential new scoring system to predict HCC recurrence after LT. The RETREAT score is more specific than the CCFSS. The incorporation of alpha-fetoprotein level at the time of LT improves the estimation of HCC recurrence in the post-LT period.     

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome undergoing liver transplantation: A systematic review of the literature

BackgroundIsolated cases of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in patients with hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) undergoing liver transplantation (LT) have been reported with increasing frequency. We aimed to systemically review and synthesize the available literature on ECMO use in this population.MethodsA systematic literature review of the PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases (end-of-search date: November 14, 2021) was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Eligible studies presented clinical parameters and outcomes of adult or pediatric patients with HPS receiving ECMO support at the time of, or following, LT.ResultsSixteen studies from 4 continents reporting on 17 patients who were initiated on ECMO prior to (n = 2), during (n = 1) or after LT (n = 14) were included. Nine of the 16 studies were published between 2019 and 2021. The median pre-LT PaO₂ was 38.0 mmHg (IQR 35.0–52.0). The median time from LT to ECMO initiation was 7 days (IQR, 3–12). Six patients (50%, n = 6 of 12) were extubated post-LT, before deterioration, development of refractory hypoxemia, and initiation of ECMO. Most patients were cannulated with a venovenous configuration (75%, n = 12 of 16). Most patients cannulated with a venoarterial or veno-arterial-venous strategy (75%, n = 3 of 4) had concurrent hemodynamic instability. The median total time on ECMO was 13 days (IQR 10–29). Using linear regression, for patients cannulated postoperatively, each day between LT and ECMO initiation was associated with a 3.5-day increase in total ECMO duration (95%CI: 2.23–4.73, p < 0.001, R² = 73.7%). The median postoperative intensive care unit length of stay was 40 days (IQR, 37–61) and hospital length of stay was 59.5 days (IQR 42–77). 82.4% of patients (14 of 17) survived to discharge.ConclusionsECMO is feasible in patients with HPS undergoing LT and appears to be associated with better outcomes compared to other causes of cardiopulmonary failure in LT patients. As the volume of experience grows, ECMO may become a central part of perioperative support in LT patients with severe HPS.     

Clinical Course of Renal Disease in Recipients of Liver Transplant Who Required Peritransplant Dialysis

PurposeRenal dysfunction is a common complication and one of the factors that affects the outcomes of liver transplantation (LT). The aim of this study was to review the clinical course of recipients of LT who needed peritransplant dialysis at our center.MethodsWe compared the clinical demographics, morbidity, and mortality between patients who required and those who did not require peritransplant dialysis among 26 recipients of LT from May 2015 to February 2018 at our center.ResultsAmong the recipients, 9 had pretransplant or posttransplant dialysis and 17 did not. The patients who underwent dialysis had a higher pretransplant Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (42 vs 13; P < .001), older donor age (41 vs 24 years; P < .001), and longer post-LT hospital stay (37 vs 20 days; P < .001). However, there was no significant difference in the serum creatinine level between the 2 groups (1.36 vs 0.93 mg/dL; P = .187) at 2 weeks (1.10 vs 0.96 mg/dL; P = .341), 1 month (1.06 vs 0.86 mg/dL; P = .105), and 3 months after LT (0.92 vs 0.94 vs 0.89 mg/dL; P = .825). Mortality was higher in the peritransplant dialysis group (P = .043). The pre-LT dialysis duration was significantly related to post-LT dialysis (P = .028) and mortality (P = .011).ConclusionsThe pre-LT dialysis duration is considered an important factor in the survival and recovery of kidney function after LT. Therefore, if the patient has started dialysis, it may be beneficial to proceed to LT as soon as possible.     

Prophylactic Use of Liposomal Amphotericin B in Preventing Fungal Infections Early After Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective,Single-Center Study

In this study the authors evaluated the efficacy of prophylaxis with liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) in the incidence of fungal infections (FI) during the first 3 months after liver transplant (LT). The study was retrospective and accessed a 4-year period from 2008 to 2011. All patients who died in the first 48 hours after LT were excluded. Patients were divided by the risk groups for FI: Group 1, high-risk (at least 1 of the following conditions: urgent LT; serum creatinine >2 mg/dL; early acute kidney injury [AKI] after LT; retransplantation; surgical exploration early post-LT; transfused cellular blood components [>40 U]); and Group 2, low-risk patients. Group 1 patients were further separated into those who received antifungal prophylaxis with L-AmB and those who did not. Prophylaxis with L-AmB consisted of intravenous administration of L-AmB, 100 mg daily for 14 days. Four hundred ninety-two patients underwent LT; 31 died in the first 48 hours after LT. From the remaining 461 patients, 104 presented with high-risk factors for FI (Group 1); of these, 66 patients received antifungal prophylaxis and 38 did not. In this group 8 FI were observed, 5 in patients without antifungal prophylaxis (P = .011). Three more FI were identified in Group 2. By logistic regression analysis, the categorical variable high-risk group was independently related to the occurrence of invasive FI (P = .006). We conclude that prophylaxis with L-AmB after LT was effective in reducing the incidence of FI. No influence on mortality was detected.     

Impact of Italian Score for Organ Allocation System on Deceased Donor Liver Transplantation: A Monocentric Competing Risk Time-to-Event Analysis

BackgroundLiver transplantation (LT) is the only definitive and curative treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the impact of the Italian score for organ allocation (ISO) in terms of the waiting-list mortality, probability of LT, and patient survival after LT.Patient and methodsAll of the adult patients on the waiting list for LT at our institute from January 2014 to December 2017 were included in the study. The probabilities of death while on the waiting list, dropout from the list, and LT were compared by means of cumulative incidence functions, in a competing risk time-to-event analysis setting. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate and compare the probability of death and to find potential risk factors for waiting-list death.ResultsThere were 286 patients on the waiting list for LT during the study period, 122 of whom entered the waiting list prior to the implementation of ISO (Group A) and 164 afterward (Group B). Group A had 62 transplants, and Group B had 116 transplants. Group B showed a lesser probability of death (P = .005) and a greater probability of transplant (P < .001) compared to Group A. In the 2 groups, post-transplant survival was similar.ConclusionBased on preliminary clinical experience from a single transplant center, the ISO allocation system demonstrated an overall reduced probability of patient death while on the waiting list without impairing post-LT survival, suggesting that the ISO system might represent an improved method of organ allocation, with a more beneficial distribution of livers.     

Impact of pretransplantation transarterial chemoembolization on survival and recurrence after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

The actual impact of transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on patient survival and HCC recurrence is not known. Between 1985 and 1998, 479 patients with HCC in 14 French centers were evaluated for LT. Among these 479 patients, this case-control study included 100 patients who received transarterial chemoembolization before LT (TACE group) and 100 control patients who did not receive chemoembolization (no-TACE group). Patients and controls were matched for the pre-LT tumor characteristics, the period of transplantation, the time spent on the waiting list, and pre- and posttransplantation treatments. Kaplan-Meier estimates were calculated 5 years after LT and were compared with the log-rank test. The mean waiting time before LT was 4.2 +/- 3.2 months in the TACE group and 4.3 +/- 4.4 months in the no-TACE group. The median number of TACE procedures was 1 (range: 1-12). Demographic data, median alpha-fetoprotein level (21.6 ng/mL and 22.0 ng/mL, respectively), and pre- and post-LT morphologic characteristics of the tumors did not differ in the TACE and no-TACE groups. Overall 5-year survival was 59.4% with TACE and 59.3% without TACE (ns). Survival rates did not differ significantly between the two groups with respect to the time on the waiting list, the tumor diameter, or the type of TACE (selective or nonselective). In the TACE group, 30 patients had tumor necrosis > or =80% on the liver explant with a 5-year survival rate of 63.2%, compared with 54.2% among their matched controls (P = 0.9). In conclusion, with a mean waiting period of 4.2 months and 1 TACE procedure, pre-LT TACE does not influence post-LT overall survival and disease-free survival.     

Hepatic Artery Thrombosis After Orthotopic Liver Transplant: Experience in the Last 10 Years

BackgroundHepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) is the second cause of graft failure, after primary disfunction. It has a significant morbidity, with a retransplant and mortality rate in early hepatic artery thrombosis of 50%. The incidence of this event goes from 2% to 9% in the adult population.MethodsThe objective is to assess the incidence of HAT in a third-level hospital. The study design is an observational retrospective study, collecting data of the transplant recipient from 2010 to 2020.ResultsIncidence of HAT was 5.33% (39/732). A statistical difference was found with the blood intraoperative administration (P = .002) and with the presence of anatomic abnormalities in the hepatic artery between the HAT and the non-HAT group. We did not find any statistical difference with portal thrombosis (P = .73) between the groups.ConclusionsHAT is a fatal complication after an orthotopic liver transplant, which can lead to graft loss and even recipient death. For these reasons, we should early identify risk factors associated with this event early and try to minimize them to avoid the devastating consequences.     

Response to Therapy as a Criterion for Awarding Priority to Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Awaiting Liver Transplantation

Background

How to prioritize patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for liver transplantation (LT) remains controversial. This study was designed to assess the effectiveness of a policy for prioritizing HCC patients according to their response to pre-LT therapy.

Methods

The study period was from 2000 to 2008. Dropout criteria included macroscopic vascular invasion, metastases, and poorly differentiated grade at pre-LT biopsy. A specific treatment algorithm was adopted to treat HCC before LT, and the effect of treatment was evaluated 3 months after listing or after the diagnosis of HCC for patients diagnosed while already on the waiting list. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1, patients with disease that completely or partially responded to therapy; and group 2, patients with stable, progressive, or untreatable disease. Group 2 patients were prioritized for LT unless full restaging and repeat biopsy identified dropout criteria.

Results

At the 3-month visit, 62 HCC patients (42%) were assigned to group 2 and 85 (58%) to group 1. Eleven of 12 dropouts due to tumor progression came from group 2 (P < 0.01). Response to therapy was the sole predictor of dropout probability, independent of tumor stage (competing risk analysis). The 42 patients in group 2 who were transplanted had much the same 3-year post-LT survival rate as the 57 transplanted patients in group 1 (with survival rates of 82% and 83%, respectively; P > 0.05), but a slightly higher risk of post-LT HCC recurrence (13% and 2%, respectively; P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Response to therapy is a potentially effective tool for prioritizing HCC patients for LT.     

Effect of an Integrated Transplantation Mental Health Program on Alcohol Relapse After Liver Transplantation for Severe Alcoholic Hepatitis: A Single-Center Prospective Study

BackgroundLiver transplantation (LT) for severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) remains controversial due to perceived increased recidivism risk after LT because of a lack of protracted abstinence before LT. Data on risk stratification for alcohol relapse after LT are limited. We sought to evaluate the utility of having a mental health program embedded in a transplantation center in risk assessment for alcohol relapse-free patient survival after LT.MethodsWe conducted a prospective analysis of all patients with a diagnosis of severe AH hospitalized at a single transplant center from April 2015 to April 2020. After a comprehensive mental health risk stratification, patients were either waitlisted for LT or declined for waitlisting. The primary endpoint was alcohol relapse-free patient survival rate for those who received LT. The secondary endpoint compared survival rates between patients who received LT and those who did not. The median follow-up was 10 months.ResultsAmong the 83 patients included in the study, 54 patients were waitlisted for LT (65%, group 1) and 29 were declined (35%, group 2). Patient characteristics and median Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score on presentation were comparable for both cohorts (36 in group 1, 38 in group 2; P = .8). Group 1 had significantly better Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplantation total scores (median 40 vs 57; P < .01), presence of social support (100% of patients in group 1 vs 76% in group 2; P < .01), and less prevalence of active tobacco smokers (30% in group 1 vs 66% in group 2; P < .01). For those who were not waitlisted, 72.5% experienced rapid deterioration of hepatic function. Among the 54 patients waitlisted, 29 patients received LT (54%), whereas 19 died while on the waiting list (35%). One- and 3-year patient survival after LT were 92.5% and 92.5%, respectively. The overall and sustained alcohol relapse rates after LT were 10.3% and 3.5%, respectively.ConclusionSevere AH is a complex medical and mental health disease and requires an intense risk assessment for recidivism after LT. Our study shows that an integrated transplantation mental health program provides an accurate risk stratification for alcohol relapse after LT, a successful intervention to mitigate recidivism risk, and optimal short-term alcohol relapse-free patient survival. Future studies should focus on enhancing the guidelines for broader application.     

Antithrombin supplementation for prevention of vascular thrombosis after pediatric liver transplantation

AimsAfter liver transplantation (LT), synthesis of coagulation factors by the graft recovers faster for pro thrombotic than anti thrombotic factors, resulting in a potential pro thrombotic imbalance. We studied the thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications in our pediatric LT series, providing supplementation of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and/or antithrombin (AT) in the prophylactic antithrombotic regimen.MethodsThis was a retrospective observational single center study. All isolated pediatric LTs performed between 1/11/2009 and 31/12/2019 (n = 181) were included. Postoperatively, in addition to low molecular weight heparin, 22 patients (12%) received FFP (10 ml/kg twice daily for 10 days), 27 patients (15%) were given FFP (reduced duration) and AT (50–100 IU/kg/day if AT activity remained <70%), and 132 (73%) received AT only. Complications, outcome, and coagulation profiles in postoperative days 0–10 were analyzed.ResultsIn all three treatment groups, AT activity normalized by day 4 while prothrombin remained <70% of normal until day 9. Hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), portal vein thrombosis (PVT), and hemorrhagic complications occurred in 2.8%, 3.3%, and 3.9% of LTs. One- and 5-year patient and graft survival were 88% (±2.4% Standard Error) and 84% (±2.5%), and 86% (±2.6%) and 84% (±2.7%), respectively, without difference between groups. HAT were associated with low AT on days 0 and 1, and PVT with low AT on day 0.ConclusionsLow antithrombin activity after LT was associated with postoperative thromboses. FFP and/or AT supplementation allowed early normalization of AT activity, while thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications were rare, suggesting efficient and safe management of post-LT coagulopathy.     

The Impact of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate on Reduced Bone Mineral Density and Fractures in Liver Transplant Recipients

BackgroundTenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is associated with reduced bone density in patients with human immunodeficiency virus, but the effect of TDF on bone density in liver transplant (LT) recipients is unknown.MethodsWe performed a single-center, retrospective study of LT recipients with hepatitis B taking TDF compared to a control group with non-hepatitis B virus viral hepatitis. The primary outcome was reduced bone density, defined as femoral neck or lumbar T-score less than ?1. Other outcomes included mean T-score and fractures.ResultsThree hundred ninety-three patients were studied: 52 patients in the TDF group and 341 patients in the control group; 64.3% patients in the TDF group had reduced bone density vs 71.4% in the control group (P = .58) before LT, compared to 75% and 81.5% (P = .57), respectively, after LT. Mean posttransplant lumbar T-scores were lower in the TDF group (?1.74 vs ?0.75, P = .04). There was no difference between the 2 groups for the other outcomes. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, TDF use did not affect the risk of post-LT reduced bone density (hazard ratio = 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.56-1.76; P = .97).ConclusionTDF use was not associated with reduced bone mineral density or increased rates of fractures in LT recipients compared to controls in this study.     

Non-HLA Autoantibodies at 1 Year Negatively Affect 5-Year Native Renal Function in Liver Transplant Recipients

BackgroundAngiotensin II type-1 receptor (AT₁R) and endothelin-1 type A receptor (ET_AR) autoantibodies, in addition to allograft injury, can bind native endothelial cells and cause vascular vasoconstriction and fibrosis progression in nontransplanted organs. Therefore, we investigated long-term native renal function in liver transplant (LT) recipients with and without anti-AT₁R-Abs and/or anti-ET_AR-Abs present in serum.MethodsPrimary LT recipients at our single center from January 2000 to April 2009 had their prospectively collected pre-LT (1269 patients) and year 1 post-LT (795 patients) serum tested retrospectively for anti-AT₁R-Abs and/or anti-ET_AR-Abs. Anti-AT₁R-Abs and anti-ET_AR-Abs testing was accomplished with a standardized solid phase assay in which >10 U was considered positive.ResultsPretransplant anti-AT₁R-Abs and/or anti-ET_AR-Abs did not change the median delta creatinine from pretransplant to 1 year post-transplant. In multivariable analysis controlling for diabetes (DM) and calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) use, anti-AT₁R-Abs and/or anti-ET_AR-Abs at 1-year remained statistically significantly associated with a decline in GFR (measured by Modification of Diet in Renal Disease-6) from years 1-5 post-LT (P = .04). In diabetic patients the association with a decline in renal function was more pronounced with (-9.29 mL/min) vs without (-2.28 mL/min) anti-AT₁R-Abs and/or anti-ET_AR-Abs at year 1, respectively (P = .004).ConclusionAt 1-year post-LT, the autoantibodies anti-AT₁R-Abs and/or anti-ET_AR-Abs are associated in multivariable analysis with an increased risk of native renal function decline especially in diabetic patients.     

Risk factors for recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis after liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the only therapeutic option for end-stage primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), but PSC can recur (rPSC) in some patients after LT. The aim of our study was to evaluate the risk factors associated with rPSC. Between 1989 and 2004, 69 patients receiving transplantation for PSC (42 male, mean age 41.9 yr). Clinical and laboratory data, activity/extension and treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC), post-LT cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, and immunosuppression were evaluated. Determination of rPSC was made by radiological and histological findings. Exclusion criteria were ABO blood group incompatibility, hepatic artery stenosis, and biliary strictures occurring in <3 months post-LT. A total of 48 (70%) patients had PSC and UC pre-LT. rPSC occurred in 7 of 53 (13.5%, 2 patients with de novo UC) who were alive 1 yr after LT and/or met inclusion/exclusion criteria: median 60 (4-120) months. No patient without post-LT UC had rPSC: 0 of 20 vs. 7 of 26 with post-LT UC (P = 0.027). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that maintenance steroids for UC (>3 months) post-LT was the only risk factor significantly associated with rPSC (P = 0.025). In conclusion, the presence of UC post-LT, and the need for maintenance steroids post-LT, which is an independent factor, are associated with rPSC. These findings could help elucidate a possible mechanism of PSC pathogenesis.     

Effect of Pre-Transplant Covid-19 Exposure on Post-Liver Transplant Clinical Outcomes

BackgroundCOVID-19 has led to an unprecedented global health crisis. This situation caused an immediate reduction in solid organ transplantation activity. This study aimed to present the follow-up results of patients with chronic liver disease who underwent liver transplantation (LT) after a history of COVID-19 infection.MethodsSociodemographic characteristics and clinicopathological data of 474 patients who underwent LT at Inonu University Liver Transplant Institute between March 11, 2020 and March 17, 2022 were prospectively recorded and analyzed retrospectively. Among these, the data of 35 patients with chronic liver disease who were found to be exposed to COVID-19 infection in the pre-LT period were analyzed for this study.ResultsThe median body mass index, Child score, and Model for end-stage liver disease/ Pediatric end-stage liver disease scores of the 35 patients were calculated as 25.1 kg/m² (IQR: 7.4), 9 points (IQR: 4), and 16 points (IQR: 10), respectively. Graft rejection occurred in 4 patients at a median of 25 days post-transplant. Five patients underwent retransplantation at a median of 25 days post-transplant. The most common cause of retransplantation is early hepatic artery thrombosis. There were 5 deaths during postoperative follow-up. Mortality developed in 5 (14.3%) patients exposed to COVID-19 infection in the pretransplant period, whereas mortality occurred in 56 (12.8%) patients not exposed to COVID-19 infection. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between the groups (P = .79).ConclusionsThe results of this study showed that exposure to COVID-19 before LT does not affect post-transplant patients and graft survival.     

A Single Center Experience of the Prognosis After Liver Transplantation From Discarded Graft Due to Poor Graft Conditions in Prioritized Centers

BackgroundLiver transplantation (LT) has the limitation of graft shortage. Therefore, to increase the donor pool, even marginal grafts are being transplanted depending on the recipient's condition. This study was conducted to analyze the post-LT prognosis using discarded liver grafts.Methods and MaterialsFrom January 2010 to September 2020, deceased-donor LT was performed in 160 patients in our center. Among them, 121 patients (allocated group) were preferentially allocated to our center, and the remaining 39 patients (24.4%, discarded group) received liver grafts that were discarded by prioritized centers.ResultsThe preoperative model for end-stage liver disease score were 27.0 ± 10.41 and 27.0 ±11.79 for each group (P = .99). There were no differences between the 2 groups in operation time (P = .06) and intraoperative packed red cell transfusion (P = .90). There were no differences between the 2 groups in early allograft dysfunction (P = .48) and hospital stay (P = .26) after deceased-donor LT. In-hospital mortality occurred in 10 patients (8.3%) in the allocated group and 4 patients (10.3%) in the discarded group. Only the length of intensive care unit stay was significantly longer in the discarded group (P = 0.04). The 5-year survival rate was 73.8% in the allocated group and 72.2% in the discarded group.ConclusionsThe outcome of the discarded group is never worse than that of the allocated group. deceased-donor LT from the discarded graft can be acceptable. As a result, the number of discarded grafts can be reduced.     

Association between Kasai portoenterostomy at low caseload centres and transplant complications in children with biliary atresia

BackgroundKasai portoenterostomy (KPE) is the preferred treatment for biliary atresia (BA) patients. It has been shown that the center caseload of KPE impacts on native liver survival. We aimed to define the impact of KPE caseload on complications at the time of liver transplantation (LT).MethodsRetrospective data collection of LT for BA performed in our tertiary center between 2010 and 2018. The patients were grouped according to the caseload of the center that performed KPE: Group A (≥5 KPE/year) and Group B (<5 KPE/year). We analyzed total transplant time (TTT), hepatectomy time, amount of plasma and red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, occurrence of bowel perforations at LT.ResultsAmong 115 patients, Group A (n 44) and Group B (n 71) were comparable for age, sex, PELD score, TTT. The groups differed for: median hepatectomy time (57 min, IQR = 50–67; vs 65, IQR 55–89, p = 0.045); RBC transfusions (95 ml, IQR 0–250; vs 200 ml, IQR 70–500, p = 0.017); bowel perforations (0/44 vs 15/71, p = 0.001). One-year graft loss in Group A vs Group B was 1/44 vs 7/71 (p = 0.239), whereas deaths were 0/44 vs 5/71 respectively (p = 0.183); 5/15 patients who had a perforation eventually lost the graft.ConclusionsThis study found an association between KPE performed in low caseload center and the incidence of complications at LT. These patients tend to have a worse outcome. The centralization of KPE to referral center represents an advantage at the time of LT.Mini abstractWe studied the impact of Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) caseload on complications at the time of liver transplantation (LT), in 115 patients. We found an association between KPE performed in low caseload center and increased bowel perforations and blood transfusions. We suggest to centralize to experienced center all children requiring KPE.     

Utility of Framingham Score for Optimizing Preoperative Evaluation Among Patients Undergoing Liver Transplant Evaluation

BackgroundCardiac testing of candidates for liver transplant (LT) requires balancing risks and benefits of cardiac procedures. The goal of this study was to evaluate the utility of the Framingham score (FS) for optimizing preoperative risk stratification for coronary artery disease (CAD).MethodsIn this single-center retrospective study of 615 adults undergoing LT evaluation from 2016 to 2019, data of preoperative evaluation, post-LT 1-year mortality, and post-LT cardiac events were reviewed. Patients >30 years of age with normal echocardiogram underwent FS calculation. Elevated FS (≥35%) patients were triaged to undergo angiogram for CAD evaluation; FS <35% patients underwent stress testing as initial CAD evaluation.ResultsOf 615 patients referred for LT, 481 underwent cardiac testing. Ninety-five were excluded from the FS pathway because of age, abnormal baseline echocardiogram, or known CAD. Of the remaining 386 patients in the FS pathway, 342 had a low FS and 44 had a high FS. In patients with low FS, 90% underwent stress testing as initial test; 16% underwent invasive testing at some time. In those with elevated FS, 59% underwent invasive testing as initial test. Listing rate and posttransplant outcomes were similar between patients with low and high FS.ConclusionWe demonstrated the feasibility of a simple algorithmic evaluation process using FS for optimizing pre-LT risk stratification for CAD. Although exceptions to the protocol occur, the proposed protocol allows for a streamlined approach by prioritizing testing based on cardiac risk. This approach may maximize diagnostic yield while limiting invasive procedures.     

Pre‐operative trans‐catheter arterial chemo‐embolization increases hepatic artery thrombosis after liver transplantation – a retrospective study

Little is known about nonsurgical risk factors for hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT ) after liver transplantation (LT ). We determined risk factors for HAT occurring within 90 days post‐LT and analysed the effect of HAT on graft and patient survival. Donor and recipient demographics, surgery‐related data and outcome in transplants complicated by thrombosis (HAT +) and their matched controls (HAT ?) were compared. Risk factors were assessed by univariate logistic regression. Median (IQR ) is given. A total of 25 HAT occurred among 1035 adult LT (1/1997–12/2014) and 50 controls were manually matched. Donor and recipient demographics were similar. Pre‐LT trans‐catheter arterial chemo‐embolization (TACE ) was more frequent in HAT + (HAT + 20% vs. HAT ? 4%, P = 0.037). HAT + had longer implantation [HAT + 88 min (76–108) vs. HAT ? 77 min (66–93), P = 0.028] and surgery times [HAT + 6.25 h (5.18–7.47) vs. HAT ? 5.25 h (4.33–6.5), P = 0.001]. Early graft dysfunction and sepsis were more frequent in HAT + and hospitalization longer. TACE had the greatest odds ratio in unadjusted analysis (OR : 6, 95% CI : 1.07–33.53, P = 0.03). All but seven grafts were lost after HAT (HAT + 72% vs. HAT ? 36%, P = 0.003); however, patient survival was unaffected (HAT + 79.8% vs. HAT ? 76%, P = 0.75). LT candidates undergoing TACE are at risk of developing HAT early after transplant.