Lung Transplantation for Severe Antineutrophilic Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitis

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis is a life-threatening disorder for which medical therapy has greatly improved survival. However, there is still significant mortality associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Little data exists on the utility of lung transplantation for patients, especially with an acute and severe form of this disease. Herein, we report successful lung transplantation for a patient with life-threatening pulmonary hemorrhage and respiratory failure as a consequence of this pulmonary renal syndrome.     

Fertility Outcome After Renal Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundWomen suffering from kidney disease are more prone to fertility problems, due to uremia. Fortunately, their fertility rate increases dramatically after renal transplantation. This study analyzes the predictors/risk factors of successful pregnancy with live birth outcome while presenting an overview of the 7-year experience of a single center.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study includes 239 women of reproductive age (18–40 years) who underwent renal transplantation in a tertiary Turkish clinic between October 1, 2011, and August 24, 2017. The subjects were invited to take part in a survey questioning their obstetric characteristics and they were assessed in 2 groups: fertile and infertile. Multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the predictors of a successful pregnancy.ResultsThirty-five 35 patients wished to become pregnant: 12 got pregnant spontaneously, while 21 failed to become pregnant (spontaneously). The mean age of the patients at the survey was 34 ± 7. Regular menstrual cycles after renal transplantation, tacrolimus-mycophenolate mofetil maintenance protocol, and age at transplantation were found to be predictors of spontaneous pregnancy. The duration of peritoneal dialysis was significantly longer in the infertile group (48 vs 12 months).ConclusionEnd-stage renal disease's negative impacts, including menstrual abnormality and fertility problems, can be overcome by successful kidney transplantation with appropriate immunosuppression. Minimizing the duration of peritoneal dialysis, particularly in patients who desire future fertility, may be accepted as a logical management strategy.     

Preemptive Living Donor Renal Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

Renal transplantation is considered preemptive if it occurs before initiation of dialysis. In our experience and in the literature, preemptive transplantation has been shown not only to reduce the costs of renal replacement therapy but also to avoid the long-term adverse effects of dialysis. Preemptive renal transplantation therefore is associated with better survival of both the allograft and the recipient. Our aim was to evaluate the outcomes of preemptive renal transplantation experience at our center. Since 1985, 1385 renal transplantations have been performed at our center. We retrospectively analyzed the 16/1385 recipients (11 male, 5 female) of overall mean age of 28.5 ± 15 years who underwent preemptive procedures. The causes of end-stage renal failure were focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (n = 5), vesicular ureteral reflux (n = 4), Berger disease (n = 2), polycystic renal disease (n = 2), and others (n = 3). Ten patients were adults, the remaining six, children. The mean creatinine clearance and plasma creatinine levels of the recipients before renal transplantation were 13.5 ± 8.5 mL/min and 6.7 ± 2.4 mg/dL, respectively. All renal transplantations were performed from living related donors. The mean preoperative serum creatinine levels, mean glomerular filtration rate, and creatinine clearance rates of the donors were 0.8 ± 0.1 mg/dL, 61.6 ± 6.5 mL/min, and 112.5 12 mL/min, respectively. Two episodes of acute cellular rejection and one of humoral rejection occurred during a mean follow-up of 48.7 ± 14 months (range = 25-76 months). The two patients who experienced graft losses due to humoral rejection or chronic rejection were retransplanted 2 and 48 months thereafter, respectively. At this time all patients are alive with good renal function. In conclusion, our single-center results are promising for preemptive renal transplantation as the optimal, least-expensive mode of treatment for end-stage renal disease.     

Management of Urologic Complications in Renal Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction

Ureterovesical complications subsequent to renal transplantation are associated with a high morbidity leading to graft loss or even death. In the present study, the management of these complications by using interventional and surgical procedures (native pyeloureterostomy [NPUS]/ureteroureterostomy [NUU] vs ureteroneocystostomy [UNC]) was evaluated retrospectively.

Patients and Methods

Between 1994 and 2012, a total of 780 kidney transplantations (690 deceased and 90 living donors) were performed at our institution. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data from patients with urologic complications were analyzed and compared.

Results

Fifty patients (6.4%) exhibited ureterovesical complications, and 18 patients (36%) were operated on immediately. In 32 (64%) of 50 patients, an interventional procedure was initially performed, with 21 patients (66%) undergoing operation due to therapy failure. NPUS/NUU and UNC were performed in 26 (66.6%) and 13 (33.3%) patients, respectively. Indications for an operation were ureteral stenosis in 12 patients (30.8%), ureteral necrosis and urine leakage in 19 patients (48.7%), and symptomatic vesicoureteral reflux in 8 patients (20.5%). Long-term results were comparable between all groups.

Conclusions

Surgical revision of ureteral complications should be the standard therapy. NPUS/NUU, UNC, and the successful interventional procedures did not differ significantly in terms of long-term results.     

Renal Transplantation in High Immunological Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundRenal transplantation (RT) in high-risk patients is increasingly performed due to an inadequate organ pool and increased rate of RT after a failed transplantation. Safety and prognosis of RT in such patients with high risk is an ongoing debate. Herein we aimed to present our single-center experience on RT of high-risk patients.MethodsA total of 89 consecutive RT patients were included into this study in a 10-month period. Patients were divided into 3 groups: the low-risk group (n = 47) with negative panel reactive antibody (PRA), medium-risk group (n = 18) with positive PRA but mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) < 2000, and high-risk group (n = 24) with positive PRA and MFI >2000 or donor specific antibody (DSA) positivity. Groups were compared in terms of demographic features, serum creatinine levels, acute rejection rates, delayed graft function (DGF), and patient or graft loss.ResultsAge of the recipients were similar between the groups. Desensitization (7% vs 11% vs 42%, respectively, in low-, medium-, and high-risk groups; P = .001), plasmapheresis (6% vs 11% vs 46%, respectively, P < .001), and rituximab treatments (0% vs 0% vs 25%, respectively, P < .001) were significantly more frequently performed in high-risk patients. Serum creatinine levels at 1 month and 6 months after RT were similar between the groups (P = .43 and P = .71, respectively). Rates of acute rejection (6% vs 6% vs 16%, respectively, P = .52) and DGF (9% vs 11% vs 29%, respectively, P = .15) were similar between the groups. Frequencies of loss of patient or graft were also similar (0% vs 6% vs 4%, P = .15).ConclusionRT may be successfully performed in high-risk patients without an increase in the risk of acute rejection, DGF, or patient/graft loss.     

In Vitro Fertilization After Renal Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

IntroductionAlthough kidney transplantation often increases the chances of fertility, the rate of infertile patients is still high. In vitro fertilization promises successful results for infertile renal transplantation patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze the experience of a single center.MethodsPatients were invited to complete a survey for their obstetric history. Documentation review included demographic and clinical characteristics of patients, like procedure records, follow-up complications, immunosuppression maintenance protocols, and pregnancy outcomes.ResultsThirteen patients were reached to complete the survey. The mean age of patients was 33 ± 4 years at in vitro fertilization (IVF). The median duration of infertility was 2 years. Twenty-four IVF sessions were applied to these 13 women with renal transplantation. The procedure failed in 13 of these sessions; and 8 women achieved 11 clinical pregnancies. There were 3 miscarriages and 2 stillbirths. Six women had live births with no neonatal deaths. One patient had a graft rejection after the IVF procedure. Serum creatinine level increased more than 30% in 3 patients after the IVF procedure, while 9 patients had a minimal or no change.DiscussionIn our study, we evaluated the records of 13 patients with renal transplantation who had IVF procedures. Fortunately, more than half of these patients had live births with no neonatal deaths. In our opinion, our findings show that IVF procedures can be accepted as a promising method in patients with renal transplantation and need a therapy for fertility. Moreover, a 25% live-birth rate per procedure is also a satisfactory result.     

Prevention of Cytomegalovirus Disease in Renal Transplantation: Single-Center Experience

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and CMV disease remain important issues in renal transplantation. Incidence depends on individual patient risk. There are different possible strategies for CMV prophylaxis. In our center CMV prevention includes prophylaxis with low-dose valganciclovir for all high-risk recipients; for the remaining patients, valganciclovir is only prescribed when there is evidence of CMV replication. All recipients are monitored for viral replication. We evaluated the results of this preventive strategy in all 135 patients who underwent transplantation between 2006 and 2007 in our center. Average follow-up time was 16 months (6-30 months). Fifty-one recipients (38%) received CMV prophylaxis. The median duration of prophylaxis was 84 days. In 37% of the recipients (50 patients) CMV antigenemia became positive, and were given therapeutic doses of valganciclovir. Of these patients, 32% were high-risk recipients undergoing prophylaxis. CMV infection rate was 40% in the group not receiving prophylaxis. No association was observed between CMV infection and prophylaxis duration. However, 50% of patients who suspended prophylaxis before completion of the first 3 months became infected. There were 3 cases of CMV disease (2.2%). Leukopenia was seen in 34% of patients receiving prophylaxis. Valganciclovir prophylaxis for high-risk patients seems to be effective and safe among subjects who complete the full duration of treatment. Despite CMV-positive antigenemia in 40% of patients not undergoing prophylaxis, pre-emptive therapy with valganciclovir was effective to prevent CMV disease, but close monitoring is essential for disease prevention.     

Outcome of Renal Transplantation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundAn increasing proportion of kidney recipients have diabetes mellitus (DM). Some concerns have been raised about the kidney transplantation results in diabetic patients. Therefore, we assessed the effect of DM on morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients with renal transplantation.MethodsWe retrospectively studied adult patients with and without DM who underwent living donor transplantation between 2007 and 2016. Information concerning demographic and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed by reviewing the patient files.ResultsOf the 1536 transplant recipients, 126 (8%) had diabetes mellitus (mean age 49.4 ± 11.8) and 525 patients were evaluated in the non-diabetic control group (mean age 36.2 ± 15.9). The diabetic and non-diabetic patient groups had a mean follow-up after kidney transplantation 42.5 months (0.27-101.7 months) and 58.8 ± 10.6 months, respectively. In the diabetic patient group, only 3 patients had lost graft and 13 patients were exitus. Three patients had lost graft and 5 patients were exitus in non-diabetic patient group. Cardiac death (54.5%) was the most common cause of mortality in diabetic group. The 6-year patient and graft survival rates are 84.9% and 95.3%; 97.5% and 97.2% in the diabetic and non-diabetic patient groups, respectively.ConclusionsBoth infection and cardiovascular diseases increase morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients with diabetes mellitus. The mortality risk of diabetic patients after renal transplantation is higher than the non-diabetic kidney recipients. Therefore, diabetic patients need meticulous cardiac evaluation before renal transplantation and a close follow-up, in terms of infection, after transplantation.     

Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Donor Selection Criteria and Postoperative Outcomes. A Single-Center Experience With a 10-Year Follow-up

Background

Donor safety must be considered to be a priority in live-donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The aim of this study was to evaluate these outcomes with special attention to surgical complications and their treatment.

Methods

From March 2001 to March 2012, 80 live donors underwent right hepatectomy (5-8 segments). The middle hepatic vein was always left in the donor. Our retrospective study analyzed surgical outcomes and complications according to the Clavien classification modified for live donors.

Results

With a median follow up of 63.2 ± 12.6 months, the mortality was 0%. Two donors experienced intraoperative complications, but all of them had complete recovery there after. Among the 22 complications in 17 donors (21.2%), 7 (8.7%) were major complications (Clavien grade 2b) but only 2 donors required surgical treatment.

Conclusions

LDLT is a safe and feasible modality to alleviate the cadaveric donor shortage. The efficacy of this procedure is similar to that with deceased donors.     

Changing Pattern of Mortality in Renal Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center, 30-Year Experience

Introduction

Patient survival among kidney transplant (KTx) recipients has improved remarkably in the past decades. The most common causes of death are cardiovascular disease in the West; in Taiwan, the answer remains uncertain.

Methods

From 1983 to 2012, KTx patients who underwent transplantation and were followed at our hospital were recruited for the study. For comparison, patients were stratified according to the transplant time as group 1, 1983–1989 (the initial era); group 2, 1990–1998 (the cyclosporine era); and group 3, 1999–2012 (the modern era, in which tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were available).

Results

A total of 520 KTx patients (male:female ratio of 285:235) were performed in our hospital during the study period. A progressive improvement in patient survival rates (P < .0001) was noted among the 3 groups. At a mean follow-up duration of 9.55 ± 8.20 years, 83 recipients had died. Overall, the most common cause of death was infection (44.6%), followed by cardiovascular disease (21.7%), malignancy (12.0%), and hepatic failure (10.8%). Infection was the main cause of death in groups 1 and 2 (44.1% and 52.6%, respectively) but not in Group 3 (18.2%), although this trend did not reach statistical significance. Death owing to cardiovascular diseases became the most common cause of death (27.3%) in the modern era (group 3).

Conclusion

The pattern of mortality among Taiwanese KTx patients has changed over the past 30 years. Infection is no longer the commonest cause of death.     

High-Urgency Renal Transplantation for Patients With Vascular Access Failure: A Single-Center Experience

In the face of access failure for renal replacement therapy or severe complications despite or due to dialysis, high-urgency renal transplant (HU-RT) allocation is possible. Vascular access failure patients have multiple comorbidities and a higher risk of cardiovascular and thrombotic events. Thus, it is presumed that graft and patient survivals might be worse for these patients.The aim of this paper was to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of HU-RT patients due to access failure for renal replacement therapy when comparing them to a population of deceased-donor renal transplant (DDRT) patients.We analyzed data from our Renal Transplantation Unit from January 2006 to April 2017. In this period, 374 patients had a renal transplant. Of these, 11 patients received a high-urgency deceased-donor renal transplant (HU-DDRT).Compared with patients who had a DDRT, HU-DDRT patients were predominantly female (54.5% vs 43.5%, P = .007) and younger (41.6 ± 7.9 vs 49.4 ± 11.8, P = .031). HU-DDRT patients were not significantly more sensitized than DDRT (14.1 ± 27.4 vs 13.5 ± 24.1, P = .935), and had a comparable number of HLA mismatches (3.4 ± 1.4 vs 3.6 ± 1.2, P = .343). Despite the higher incidence in hypertensive (90.9 vs 73.5%, P = .196) and diabetic patients (27.3% vs 15.7%, P = .305) in the HU-DDRT group, this difference was not statistically significant. The percentage of retransplantation was similar in both groups (9.1% vs 7.2%, P = .808). Donor sex, age, and baseline serum creatinine were similar between the groups. There was an increased proportion of expanded criteria donors in HU-DDRT (54.5% vs 25.1%, P = .028).There were no differences in cold or warm ischemia time nor in serum creatinine at discharge or during the first 2 years of follow-up. In both groups, a similar proportion of patients experienced acute rejection episodes. Comparable to DDRT patients, HU-DDRT patients had a high proportion of graft survival at the 1-year follow-up (90.9% vs 93.1%, P = .777). At a 2-year follow-up, graft survival was lower in the HU-DDRT group (81.8% vs 91.5%, P = .267).Mean follow-up for both groups was comparable (78.5 ± 46.7 vs 68.4 ± 40.8 months, P = .424). Overall, graft loss occurred in approximately 36.4% of HU-DDRT patients and 20.9% of DDRT patients (P = .219). Both groups had an overall mortality rate of around 9%. The differences were not statistically significant due to the limited number of patients.More comorbidities and reportedly worse cardiovascular prognosis of access failure (AF) patients and use of expanded criteria donors did not negatively reflect in worse short-term outcomes in our cohort, which highlights the importance of HU-RT in prolonging the survival of AF patients.     

Vascular Complications in Renal Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience in 1367 Renal Transplantations and Review of the Literature

Renal transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease. Vascular complications in renal transplantation are not uncommon and may often lead to allograft loss. The most common vascular complications are transplant renal artery stenosis, transplant renal artery thrombosis, transplant renal vein thrombosis, biopsy-induced vascular injuries, pseudoaneurysm formation, and hematomas. Transplant renal artery and vein thrombosis have an early onset and a dramatic clinical manifestation and usually lead to allograft loss. In contrast, transplant renal artery stenosis has better treatment possibilities, whereas the rest do not occur so often. In our institution, 1367 renal transplantations were performed from September 1980 to April 2005. During this period, we encountered 38 major vascular complications leading to graft loss and 19 transplant renal artery stenoses with successful treatment in the majority of cases. According to these data, we can conclude that renal transplantation is a safe therapeutic procedure for renal failure.     

Primary Nonfunction in Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

Primary nonfunction (PNF) after liver transplantation is life threatening. In recent review of data from Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients on liver transplantations between 2002 and 2004, the rate of PNF was 5.8%. In this study, our aim was to review the incidence and outcome of PNF at our transplant center. From February 1998 through December 2007, 1679 liver transplants were performed. There were 24 PNF (1.4%) in 22 patients. The 6- and 12-month patient survival rates were 72.2% and 63.3%, respectively. Our results demonstrate a low incidence of PNF at our center. However, the patient survival outcome remains poor. Future investigations to improve survival among liver transplant recipients with PNF are essential.     

Kidney Transplantation in Elderly Recipients: A Single-Center Experience

In this retrospective single-center study we evaluated the outcome after kidney transplant in recipients older than 65 years in terms of patient and graft survival and causes of death.