Efficacy and Safety of Hepatitis B Virus Vaccination Following Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin Withdrawal After Liver Transplantation

BackgroundHepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and oral nucleoside/nucleotide analogs have been the mainstay of hepatitis B virus (HBV) prophylaxis after liver transplantation. However, long-term HBIG administration could have disadvantages, such as an increase in medical costs and the development of mutant HBV strains. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of HBV vaccination after the withdrawal of HBIG after liver transplantation.MethodsThis prospective open-label single-arm observational clinical trial enrolled 41 patients who underwent liver transplantation between 2010 and 2016 because of a condition related to chronic HBV infection. At the time of enrollment, all patients had taken entecavir and discontinued HBIG administration. When hepatitis B surface antibody titer was undetectable after the withdrawal of HBIG, a recombinant HBV vaccine was injected intramuscularly at month 0, 1, and 6.ResultsAfter excluding 5 patients who dropped out and 2 patients who had a persistent hepatitis B surface antibody titer, 9 (26.5%) of 34 patients had a positive vaccination response. The median hepatitis B surface antibody titer at seroconversion was 86 (12-1000) IU/L, and those at the end of follow-up were 216 (30-1000) IU/L. No patients experienced HBV recurrence during the study period. Sex (female, odds ratio 32.91 [1.83-592.54], P = .018) and the dosing interval of HBIG before withdrawal (≥90 days, 16.21 [1.21-217.31], P = .035) were independent contributing factors for positive response to the vaccination.ConclusionHBV vaccination still deserves consideration as active immunoprophylaxis after liver transplantation because it could provide added immunity to nucleoside/nucleotide analogs monotherapy with excellent cost-effectiveness.     

替诺福韦单一用药预防肝移植术后乙肝复发的疗效分析

目的 探讨乙型肝炎病毒(hepatitis B virus,HBV)相关肝移植(liver transplantation,LT)后停用乙肝免疫球蛋白(hepatitis B immunoglobulin,HBIG)单用替诺福韦(tenofovir disoproxil fumarate,TDF)预防HBV复发的有效性...     

肝移植术后乙型肝炎复发的预防和治疗

目的探讨拉米夫定联合低剂量乙型肝炎（乙肝）免疫球蛋白（HBIG）预防肝移植术后乙肝复发的效果及乙肝复发后的治疗。方法对2000年12月至2003年5月因乙肝相关性终末期肝病和（或）合并肝细胞癌于我院接受肝移植手术并经随访的11例患者进行回顾性分析。所有患者均接受拉米夫定联合低剂量HBIG预防乙肝复发方案。观察术后近期乙肝转阴情况、术后较远期乙肝复发情况以及乙肝复发后的治疗情况。结果（1）所有患者HBsAg、HBeAg、HBV-DNA均于术后1-4d转为阴性,术后1周所有患者对HBIG均有反应,HBsAb滴度水平逐渐上升;（2）所有患者于观察期内生存情况均良好,对患者HBsAb滴度水平定期进行监测结果示大部分患者HBsAb滴度水平与预期治疗水平基本符合;（3）1例患者于术后25个月乙肝复发,通过改用阿德弗韦并加大HBIG用量,基本得到控制。结论拉米夫定联合低剂量HBIG预防肝移植后乙肝复发疗效确切,而且可显著降低治疗费用。     

Entecavir Monotherapy Prevents Hepatitis B Virus Recurrence After Liver Transplant for Chronic Hepatitis B Patients: A Long-Term Retrospective Study

BackgroundLimited data are available on the use of oral antiviral therapy, particularly the long-term use of entecavir monotherapy in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)–related diseases after liver transplant (LT).MethodsThe clinical data on consecutive patients who underwent LT for HBV-related diseases from 2011 to 2019 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. All patients received entecavir monotherapy alone during the follow-up period; viral serology/load and liver biochemical tests were performed regularly.ResultsAmong the total of 89 patients were patients with decompensated cirrhosis (n = 27 [30%]), acute-on-chronic HBV (n = 21 [24%]), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n = 41 [46%]). The median age of the patients was 50 years (range, 42-58 years), and the median follow-up was 37 months (range, 1-96 months). Before LT, 45 (51%) patients did not receive, whereas 44 (49%) were currently receiving, oral antiviral therapy. At the time of LT, serum level of HBV DNA of 34 (38%) patients was >20 IU/mL, with the median level being 270,000 IU/mL (range, 4270-2,020,000), and 53 patients (59%) had undetectable levels of HBV DNA (≤20 IU/mL). The cumulative rate of hepatitis B surface antigen loss was 79.8%, 100%, and 100% after 1 month, 1 year, and 5 years, respectively. Hepatitis B surface antigen positivity returned after seroclearance in 1 patient, who died of HCC recurrence with an undetectable level of HBV DNA. The overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years after LT were 94.51%, 86.84%, and 85.27%, respectively. During the follow-up period, no entecavir adverse reactions or dose reductions were observed.ConclusionsLong-term entecavir monotherapy was highly effective in preventing HBV reactivation and HBV-related diseases.     

Recurrence-free long-term survival after liver transplantation for hepatitis B using interferon-alpha pretransplant and hepatitis B immune globulin posttransplant.

OBJECTIVE: The authors determined whether pretransplant reduction of hepatitis B virus (HBV) load using alpha-interferon-2b (IFN) and passive immunoprophylaxis using hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) posttransplantation can prevent HBV recurrence in patients undergoing liver transplantation (LT) for HBV cirrhosis. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Liver transplantation in patients with HBV cirrhosis is associated with a high rate of recurrence and reduced survival. In patients with evidence of replicating virus (HBV-DNA or hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg]-positive serum or both), recurrence is nearly universal. Passive immunoprophylaxis with HBIg alone is not effective in preventing HBV recurrence posttransplant, especially in patients with evidence of active viral replication pretransplant. Higher doses of HBIg posttransplant has reduced recurrence rates to 30% to 50%. Lamivudine, a nucleoside analogue that has shown early promise, also is associated with significant HBV recurrence. The authors report a reliable method of preventing viral recurrence in patients even with evidence for active HBV replication pretransplant. METHODS: Pretransplant patients with evidence of replicating HBV were given IFN starting at 1 million IU 3 times per week subcutaneously. This dose was increased to 2 and then 3 million IU 3 times per week when patient's side effects permitted and was maintained until the patient underwent a LT. All patients were tested every 4 weeks for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), HBeAg, and HBV-DNA. When patients became negative for HBeAg and HBV-DNA, they were listed for LT. Patients that were only HBsAg positive were listed immediately and received a LT without prior IFN treatment. Post-LT, all patients began receiving HBIg 2000 IU (10 mL) daily from days 1 to 20 and then weekly for the first 2 years. After 2 years, all patients received 2000 IU (10 mL) monthly. Additional HBIg immunoprophylaxis was given during intense immunosuppression for rejection. Posttransplant serum was tested for HBsAg, HBeAg, and HBV-DNA in all patients 1 week, 1 month, and every 3 months thereafter. Liver biopsies were done at least yearly and when liver enzymes were abnormal and were always tested for HBsAg and HBcAg by immunoperoxidase. RESULTS: Thirteen patients with decompensated HBV cirrhosis were transplanted. Pretransplant, eight patients had evidence of active viral replication at the initial assessment (HBeAg or HBV-DNA-positive serum or both). All eight were successfully treated with IFN (median duration, 24 weeks; range, 8-53) and converted to a negative status before transplantation. Side effects from IFN were minimal and well tolerated, except in one patient who required 6 million IU to convert to a nonreplicating status. The five patients that were only HBsAg positive were not treated with IFN pretransplant. After surgery, HBIg given as described achieved consistently serum levels greater than 1000 IU/L. Twelve of the 13 patients are alive with normal liver function and without serologic evidence of HBV recurrence at a median follow-up of 32 months (range, 9-56 months). None have evidence of HBV recurrence as measured by serum HBsAg/HBeAg/HBV-DNA at recent follow-up. The sera of the seven longest survivors has tested negative for HBV-DNA using the polymerase chain reaction method. In addition, a liver biopsy was obtained in six of these patients, the results of which also tested negative for HBV-DNA using polymerase chain reaction. Liver biopsy specimens have been negative for the presence of HBsAg and HBcAg by immunoperoxidase staining in all 12 patients. CONCLUSION: A reduction of viral load pretransplant with IFN and posttransplant HBIg prevents recurrence of hepatitis B and permits LT for HBV cirrhosis, even in patients with evidence of replicating virus. The IFN pretransplant was well tolerated, and the small frequent dosing of HBIg posttransplant did not cause side effects while achieving serum levels > 1000 IU/L.     

An Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Combination Hepatitis B Immune Globulin and Lamivudine to Prevent Recurrent Hepatitis B After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation Compared With Hepatitis B Immune Globulin Monotherapy

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was limited until recently by poor graft and patient outcomes caused by recurrent HBV. Long-term immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) dramatically improved post-OLT survival, but recurrent HBV still occurred in up to 36% of the recipients. More recently, combination HBIG and lamivudine has been shown to effectively prevent HBV recurrence in patients post-OLT. The aim of the current study is to determine long-term outcome and cost-effectiveness of using combination HBIG and lamivudine compared with HBIG monotherapy in patients who undergo OLT for HBV. A retrospective chart review identified 59 patients administered combination HBIG and lamivudine and 12 patients administered HBIG monotherapy as primary prophylaxis against recurrent HBV. Lamivudine, 150 mg/d, was administered orally indefinitely. HBIG was administered under a standard protocol (10,000 IU intravenously during the anhepatic phase, then 10,000 IU/d intravenously for 7 days, then 10,000 IU intravenously monthly) indefinitely. A decision-analysis model was developed to evaluate the potential economic impact of prophylaxis against HBV with combination therapy compared with monotherapy. Recurrent HBV was defined as the reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) after its initial disappearance post-OLT. In the combination-therapy group, no patient redeveloped serum HBsAg or HBV DNA during mean follow-ups of 459 and 416 days, respectively. In the monotherapy group, 3 patients (25%) had reappearance of HBsAg in serum during a mean follow-up of 663 days. Combination therapy resulted in a dominant, cost-effective strategy with an average cost-effectiveness ratio of $252,111/recurrence prevented compared with $362,570/recurrence prevented in the monotherapy strategy. Combination prophylaxis with HBIG and lamivudine is highly effective in preventing recurrent HBV, may protect against the emergence of resistant mutants, and is significantly more cost-effective than HBIG monotherapy with its associated rate of recurrent HBV. (Liver Transpl 2000;6:741-748.)     

Prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation in carriers of lamivudine-resistant mutants.

The combination of lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) reduces the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). However, the efficacy of this strategy and the need for combined therapy with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in patients who select lamivudine-resistant strains (YMDD) before surgery is still unknown. Twenty-two patients treated with lamivudine (LAM) who underwent LT after YMDD-mutant selection were studied. In 13 patients, YMDD mutants were associated with an HBV DNA breakthrough greater than 5 log10 (group A: phenotypic resistance), and 11 were treated with ADV to decrease viral load before LT. In the remaining 9 patients who did not experience the viral breakthrough, YMDD mutants were detected only retrospectively in sera stored at the time of LT (group B: genotypic resistance). During 35 months of post-LT follow-up, none of the 11 patients of group A treated with ADV before and after surgery (in addition to HBIG and LAM) had HBV recurrence, and neither did any of the 7 subjects of group B treated with LAM before and after transplantation (in addition to HBIG). HBV recurred in 2 patients of group A (untreated with ADV before surgery and transplanted with an HBV DNA exceeding 5 log10) and in 2 subjects of group B (who spontaneously stopped HBIG after surgery). In carriers of YMDD mutants, the risk of post-LT HBV recurrence is low, provided that preemptive and prophylactic ADV (in addition to LAM and HBIG) treatment is used in highly viremic patients and prophylactic LAM (or ADV) and HBIG therapy is continued in low viremic patients.     

Antiviral treatment for hepatitis B virus recurrence following liver transplantation

The purpose of this study was to identify the factors associated with the recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) following liver transplantation (LT) for HBV‐related disease and to recognize the outcome of treatment for HBV recurrence with oral nucleos(t)ide analogues. Six hundred and sixty‐seven LTs were performed for HBsAg‐positive adult patients in our institute from 1996 to 2010. HBV prophylaxis was performed by hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) monotherapy or HBIG and entecavir combination therapy. There were 63 cases (11.4%) of HBV recurrences during a median follow‐up of 51 months. The median time to HBV recurrence was 22 months. A preoperative HBV DNA load of more than 10⁵ IU/mL, HBIG monotherapy, and hepatocellular carcinoma in the explant liver were independent risk factors for HBV recurrence following LT in multivariate analysis. Patient survival at 10 yr was 54.2% for HBV‐recurrent patients. Among patients with HBV recurrence, HBsAg seroclearance was achieved in 13 patients (20.6%), but HBsAg seroclearance did not affect survival in these patients after the recurrence of HBV (p = 0.28). The recurrence of HBV led to graft failure in six cases. HBV recurrence should be prevented by strict management of pre‐transplant HBV viremia and an effective post‐transplant HBV prophylaxis.     

Lamivudine After Hepatitis B Immune Globulin Is Effective in Preventing Hepatitis B Recurrence After Liver Transplantation

The prevention of recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) is expensive and requires indefinite parenteral administration. Lamivudine is a nucleoside analogue capable of inhibiting HBV replication. The aim of this study is to determine the efficacy of lamivudine in the prevention of recurrent HBV infection after a course of HBIG in patients who were hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive and hepatitis Be antigen (HBeAg) negative before OLT. Patients at high risk for recurrent HBV infection (HBeAg positive and HBV DNA positive) were excluded. Thirty HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative patients underwent OLT from January 1993 to June 1997. All 30 patients were administered HBIG after OLT and, after 2 years, were given the option of continuing with HBIG or switching to lamivudine. Five patients were excluded: 3 patients were lost to follow-up and 2 patients died of technical complications. Three patients terminated HBIG therapy at 8, 24, and 29 months after OLT, and reinfection with HBV occurred in 1 patient. Six patients elected to continue HBIG therapy for life; 1 patient died of melanoma and the remaining 5 patients are HBsAg negative, with an average follow-up of 73 months. Sixteen patients were converted to lamivudine after a course of HBIG, and all 16 patients are HBsAg negative, with an average follow-up of 51 months after OLT. Five patients have been on lamivudine monotherapy for more than 24 months. These results suggest that lamivudine administered after a posttransplantation course of HBIG can effectively prevent the recurrence of HBV infection in patients who are HBsAg positive and HBeAg negative before OLT. (Liver Transpl 2000;6:434-439.)     

Intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin combined with lamivudine for prophylaxis against hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation.

Immunoprophylaxis using intravenous (IV) hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) decreases the recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, IV HBIG is expensive, has significant side effects, and is inconvenient to administer. An alternative approach for prophylaxis using intramuscular (IM) HBIG and oral lamivudine was prospectively evaluated in this study. Ten consecutive patients with cirrhosis with HBV infection who underwent OLT were included in this study. Nine of 10 patients received lamivudine, 150 mg/d, for an average duration of 8.6 months before OLT. Two of 10 patients with detectable HBV DNA at the time of OLT received 10,000 U (45 mL) of IV HBIG daily for 7 consecutive days, followed by 5 mL of IM HBIG weekly for the next 3 weeks, then every 3 weeks. The other 8 patients were HBV DNA negative at OLT and received one dose of IV HBIG (45 mL) during surgery, followed by 5 mL of IM HBIG weekly for 4 weeks, then every 3 weeks. All patients received lamivudine, 150 mg/d, after OLT. During a mean follow-up of 15.6 months, 9 of 10 patients achieved a protective hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) titer greater than 200 IU/L and had no evidence of HBV recurrence. One patient failed to develop an adequate HBsAb titer and developed histological and virological evidence of recurrence. One patient died unrelated to HBV recurrence. Our preliminary data suggest that this combination prophylaxis with IM HBIG and lamivudine is effective and potentially cost saving.     

High Genetic Barrier Nucleos(t)ide Analogue(s) for Prophylaxis From Hepatitis B Virus Recurrence After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review

The combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and nucleos(t)ide analogues [NA(s)] is considered as the standard of care for prophylaxis against HBV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT), but the optimal protocol is controversial. We evaluated the efficacy of the newer NAs with high genetic barrier (hgbNA) [i.e. entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir (TDF)] with or without HBIG as prophylaxis against HBV recurrence after LT. In total, 519 HBV liver transplant recipients from 17 studies met the inclusion criteria and they were compared to those under lamivudine (LAM) and HBIG who had been selected in our previous review. Patients under HBIG and LAM developed HBV recurrence (115/1889 or 6.1%): (a) significantly more frequently compared to patients under HBIG and a hgbNA [1.0% (3/303), p < 0.001], and (b) numerically but not significantly more frequently compared to the patients who received a newer NA after discontinuation of HBIG [3.9% (4/102), p = 0.52]. The use of a hgbNA without any HBIG offered similar antiviral prophylaxis compared to HBIG and LAM combination, if the definition of HBV recurrence was based on HBV DNA detectability [0.9% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.11]. Our findings favor the use of HBIG and a hgbNA instead of HBIG and LAM combined prophylaxis against HBV recurrence after LT.     

Virologic and Clinical Outcomes of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in HIV‐HBV Coinfected Transplant Recipients

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for end‐stage liver disease, but is controversial in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Using a prospective cohort of HIV‐hepatitis B virus (HBV) coinfected patients transplanted between 2001–2007; outcomes including survival and HBV clinical recurrence were determined. Twenty‐two coinfected patients underwent LT; 45% had detectable HBV DNA pre‐LT and 72% were receiving anti‐HBV drugs with efficacy against lamivudine‐resistant HBV. Post‐LT, all patients received hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) plus nucleos(t)ide analogues and remained HBsAg negative without clinical evidence of HBV recurrence, with a median follow‐up 3.5 years. Low‐level HBV viremia (median 108 IU/mL, range 9–789) was intermittently detected in 7/13 but not associated with HBsAg detection or ALT elevation. Compared with 20 HBV monoinfected patients on similar HBV prophylaxis and median follow‐up of 4.0 years, patient and graft survival were similar: 100% versus 85% in HBV mono‐ versus coinfected patients (p = 0.08, log rank test). LT is effective for HIV‐HBV coinfected patients with complications of cirrhosis, including those who are HBV DNA positive at the time of LT. Combination HBIG and antivirals is effective as prophylaxis with no clinical evidence of HBV recurrence but low‐level HBV DNA is detectable in ～50% of recipients.     

Combination Low-Dose Hepatitis B Immune Globulin and Lamivudine Therapy Provides Effective Prophylaxis Against Posttransplantation Hepatitis B

Although antiviral prophylaxis with lamivudine monotherapy appears to reduce post–liver transplantation recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, breakthrough infections occur in at least 20% of the patients because of the development of drug resistance. Combined lamivudine and intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) therapy (10,000-IU doses) may reduce this risk, but its use is limited by cost (∼US $45,000/yr) and availability. We report the experience at liver transplant centers in Australia and New Zealand in which lamivudine has been used in combination with much lower doses of HBIG than used in conventional HBIG prophylaxis. Lamivudine, 100 mg/d, was administered to hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)–positive candidates on listing for transplantation and was continued posttransplantation. HBIG, 400 or 800 IU, was administered intramuscularly (IM) daily for 1 week from transplantation and monthly thereafter. Thirty-seven HBsAg-positive patients underwent transplantation using this protocol. Thirty-six of these patients were HBV DNA positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or hybridization assay. Thirty-four patients had chronic HBV, 2 patients had hepatitis B and C, and 1 patient had hepatitis B, C, and D. Five patients died within 1 month of transplantation and are not included in the analysis. Mean follow-up in the remaining 32 patients was 18.4 months (range, 5 to 45 months). Treatment was well tolerated, with no significant adverse events. Thirty-one of 32 patients were HBsAg negative, and all 32 patients were HBV DNA negative by PCR at latest follow-up. The cost of treatment was US $967 for lamivudine and between $2,290 and $4,480/yr for IM HBIG. Lamivudine and low-dose HBIG treatment prevents posttransplantation recurrence of hepatitis B and is likely to be more cost-effective than high-dose HBIG regimens.(Liver Transpl 2000;6:429-433.)     

Use of hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors in orthotopic liver transplantation

HYPOTHESIS: Hepatic allografts from donors positive for antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc) frequently transmit hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection to recipients. Therefore, most transplantation centers will not use these organs for orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Although it is expensive and not always efficacious, hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) has been used routinely for indefinite periods to prevent HBV infection in liver allograft recipients. We assessed the effectiveness of long-term use of a nucleoside analog, lamivudine, in preventing HBV transmission by anti-HBc-positive allografts. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: A tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Twelve patients received hepatic allografts from anti-HBc-positive donors at Loyola University Medical Center, Chicago, between February 23, 1998, and March 13, 2001. INTERVENTION: All patients received 10 000 U/d of intravenous HBIG for 7 days. In addition, they received 300 mg/d of lamivudine in divided doses. Their liver biopsy specimens were tested for HBV DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb). Serum samples from the donor and recipient were tested for HBcAb, HBV DNA, and hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The incidence of HBV infection in recipients who received HBcAb-positive donor livers and lamivudine prophylaxis. RESULTS: All recipients were anti-HBc negative before OLT. Five of the recipients had HBsAb titers greater than 150 U at the time of OLT. Three of the donor livers were HBV DNA positive and 2 were hepatitis B core antigen positive at the time of OLT. Donor serum was HBcAb positive in all 12 donors. None of the recipients have become infected with HBV with a follow-up of 2 to 38 months. CONCLUSION: Perioperative use of HBIG combined with long-term use of lamivudine can prevent HBV infection in recipients who receive hepatic allografts from HBcAb-positive donors.     

A Very Short Course of HBIg+NA Followed by Entecavir or Tenofovir Monotherapy Prevents HBV Recurrence in Low-Risk Liver Transplant Recipients

BackgroundMonoprophylaxis with third-generation nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) can be safely adopted in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-positive, liver transplantation (LT) patients after at least 6 months of HBV immunoglobulin (HBIg)+NA. We investigated the efficacy of earlier initiation of post-LT entecavir (ETV) or tenofovir (TDF) monoprophylaxis.MethodsBetween September 2011 and January 2017, all consecutive hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive transplanted patients were scheduled to receive HBIg with ETV or TDF for a period related to the risk for HBV reinfection: 1. low-risk patients (HBeAg-negative and HBV DNA < 12 IU/mL before LT) were due to withdraw from HBIg once HBsAg had become negative after a minimum of 7 days of HBIg+NA; 2. high-risk patients were due to receive HBIg for at least 6 months, after which they continued with third-generation NA monotherapy, only.ResultsTwenty patients with a median interquartile range (IQR) follow-up of 46 (64-39) months were enrolled in the study (40% receiving ETV, 60% receiving TDF). Two low-risk patients refused early HBIg withdrawal and were therefore treated and analyzed along with the high-risk group. Eventually, there were 2 groups: group A, which included 12 low-risk patients, and group B, which included 8 patients (six high-risk, 2 low-risk). After transplantation, group A and B patients received HBIg+NA for a median (IQR) time of 7 (9-7) days and 9 (13-5) months, respectively. All 20 recipients demonstrated HBV DNA < 12 IU/mL and stable graft function during follow-up. Two patients (10%), 1 from each group, had HBsAg relapse. Notably, both patients who relapsed had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosed before LT and showed very low levels (< 0.25 IU/mL) of HBsAg after recurrence.ConclusionIn low-risk HBsAg-positive recipients, HBIg may be safely discontinued within 2 weeks of LT and replaced by ETV or TDF monotherapy.     

Minimization of Anti–hepatitis B Surface Antigen Immunoglobulins for Prophylaxis of Hepatitis B Viral Recurrence in the First Month After Liver Transplantation: The Meaning of HBsAg Quantitative Level at the Time of Transplant

Background

Hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) has practically disappeared with a prophylaxis combining anti–hepatitis B surface antigen Immunoglobulins (HBIg) and antiviral drugs. Recently, cost-saving requirements pushed us to move from a fixed schedule of 50,000 IU intravenous HBIg in the first month after LT to an “on demand” administration guided by close monitoring of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HBV surface Antigen antibody (HBsAb) with a serological target of HBsAg negative and HBsAb >300 mIU/mL. In this context, we investigated the meaning of HBsAg quantitative determination at LT in predicting the need of HBIg in the first month after LT.

Methods

From February 2012 to July 2013, we performed 35 LTs in HBsAg-positive patients, 18 of whom had hepatitis Delta virus coinfection (Delta-positive). Anti-HBV prophylaxis was based on nucleos(t)ide analogues from day 1 post-LT and intravenous HBIg (10,000 IU intraoperatively and, in the following days, 5,000 IU and 2,500 IU pulses to reach and maintain the serological target).

Results

The HBsAg quantitative level at LT was significantly higher in Delta-positive recipients. Complete negativization of HBsAg and HBsAb serum level >300 mIU/mL was achieved on day 3 in Delta-positive and on day 2 in Delta-negative. A positive linear correlation between HBsAg quantitative level at LT and HBIg administered in the first month after LT was observed (RHO = .788), with a total of 32,500 IU HBIg used in HDV-positive and 22,000 IU in HDV-negative recipients (P = .0016). Compared to the old schedule, we saved a median of 14,750 IU in HDV-positive and 28,000 IU in Delta-negative. No HBV recurrence was observed in a median follow-up of 10.5 months.

Conclusions

Delta-positive patients need higher doses of HBIg to reach the serological target after LT because they have greater HBsAg quantitative levels at LT. In future studies, pre-LT HBsAg quantitative determination will be helpful to predict the actual need of HBIg early after LT.     

New nucleos(t)ide analogue monoprophylaxis after cessation of hepatitis B immunoglobulin is effective against hepatitis B recurrence

New nucleos(t)ide agents (NAs) [entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir (TDF)] have made hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG)‐sparing protocols an attractive approach against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). Twenty‐eight patients transplanted for HBV cirrhosis in our centre were prospectively evaluated. After LT, each patient received HBIG (1000 IU IM/day for 7 days and then monthly for 6 months) plus ETV or TDF and then continued with ETV or TDF monoprophylaxis. All patients had undetectable HBV DNA at the time of LT, and they were followed up with laboratory tests including glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after LT. All patients (11 under ETV and 17 under TDF) remained HBsAg/HBV DNA negative during the follow‐up period [median: 21 (range 9–43) months]. GFR was not different between TDF and ETV groups of patients at 6 and 12 months and last follow‐up (P value >0.05 for all comparisons). The two groups of patients were similar regarding their ratio of maximum rate of tubular phosphate reabsorption to the GFR (TmP/GFR). In conclusion, in this prospective study, we showed for the first time that maintenance therapy with ETV or TDF monoprophylaxis after 6 months of low‐dose HBIG plus ETV or TDF after LT is highly effective and safe.     

Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors of Hepatitis B Virus Recurrence in Patients Who Received Prophylaxis With Entecavir and Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin Following Liver Transplantation

Introduction

Although entecavir (ETV) and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) have widely been used for prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence following liver transplantation (OLT), there have been few studies about clinical outcomes and risk factors of HBV recurrence.

Materials and methods

This study retrospectively assessed clinical outcomes and identified risk factors of post-transplant HBV recurrence in 154 patients who received prophylaxis with both ETV and HBIG after OLT.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 28.0 months (range, 1.0–57.8). Post-transplant HBV recurrence occurred in 5 patients (3.2%) without any ETV-resistant mutants. The overall rates of HBV recurrence at 1, 2, and 4 years were 0.6%, 1.6%, and 6.2%, respectively. We found that recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was an independent risk factor of HBV recurrence (hazard ratio = 13.5, 95% confidence interval, 2.4–74.4; P = .006).

Conclusions

Prophylaxis with a combination of ETV and HBIG resulted in a low HBV recurrence rate following OLT without any emergence of ETV-resistant mutants. Recurrent HCC was an independent risk factor of HBV recurrence in patients who received prophylaxis with both ETV and HBIG for prophylaxis following OLT.     

Prophylaxis Against Hepatitis B Recurrence Posttransplantation Using Lamivudine and Individualized Low‐Dose Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin

Although the combination of lamivudine (LAM) and high‐dose intravenous (IV) hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) is very effective in preventing hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT), the major limitation of this regimen is its high cost. A more cost‐effective, convenient and widely accepted regimen is urgently needed. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of another strategy using LAM and individualized low‐dose intramuscular (IM) HBIG. Between May 2002 and December 2009, a total of 254 adult patients undergoing LT for HBV‐related benign end‐stage liver diseases received this regimen in our center. The mean follow‐up of these patients was 41.2 ± 22.7 months. Their 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐year survival rates were 85.3%, 77.4% and 76.4%, respectively, and 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐year HBV recurrence rates were 2.3%, 6.2% and 8.2%. Fourteen patients experienced posttransplant HBV recurrence. Pretransplant high viral load and posttransplant prednisone withdrawal time were observed to be associated with recurrence. In conclusion, combination therapy with LAM and individualized low‐dose IM HBIG provides a safe and effective prophylaxis against HBV recurrence after LT at about 5% of the cost of conventional high‐dose IV HBIG regimens.     

Correlation Between Risk of Hepatitis B Virus Recurrence and Tissue Expression of Covalently Closed Circular DNA in Living Donor Liver Transplant Recipients Treated With High-dose Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin

Background and AimsDespite the application of prophylaxis, the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence remains. However, actual mechanism(s) and definite risk factor(s) are obscure. The present study examined the correlation between the HBV load in liver explants and post-liver transplant (OLT) HBV recurrence.MethodsHBV DNA was extracted from liver tissue taken from 50 living donor OLT (LDLT) patients using the QuickGene DNA Tissue Kit S (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) and subjected to real-time polymerase chain reaction with the following primers: 5′-CACATGGCCTCCAAGGAGTAA-3′ (forward primer) and 5′-TGAGGGTCTCTCTCTTCCTCTTGT-3′ (reverse primer). To prevent HBV infection, patients were treated daily with high-dose (10,000 IU) hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) for the first week after LDLT. They then received weekly doses for the next month and then monthly doses for ≤1 year. If the anti-hepatitis surface antigen antibody titer was <1,000 IU/L, an antiviral agent (AVA) was added to the regimen.ResultsThe mean (±SD) tissue HBV DNA and covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) loads were ?0.8 ± 1.2 (range, ?2.9 to 2.6) and ?2.3 ± 1.1 (range, ?4.6 to 0.6) log₁₀ copies/cell, respectively. There was a significant correlation between serum and tissue HBV DNA (r = 0.65; P = .00) and cccDNA concentrations (r = 0.55; P = .00). Six patients suffered HBV recurrence and 9 required additional AVA. There was no direct correlation between HBV recurrence and tissue cccDNA concentration. However, the concentration of cccDNA was significantly greater those patients suffering recurrence and receiving AVA treatment (high-risk group).ConclusionHigh tissue cccDNA concentrations may be a risk factor for HBV recurrence despite high-dose HBIG prophylaxis.