Comparison of histidine-tryptophan ketoglutarate and University of Wisconsin solutions as primary preservation in renal allografts undergoing pulsatile perfusion

INTRODUCTION: University of Wisconsin (UW) solution is the standard preservation solution for organ transplantation. Histidine-tryptophan ketogluatarate (HTK) solution has been used increasingly for kidney, pancreas, and liver transplantation. This study compared HTK and UW used during kidney procurement with subsequent pulsatile perfusion. METHODS: Between January and October 2003, 91 deceased renal and simultaneous kidney pancreas transplants were performed (UW, n = 41, and HTK, n = 50). There were no differences with regard to donor and recipient demographics or cold ischemia. RESULTS: Delayed graft function occurred in 3 (7%) of UW and 4 (8%) of HTK-preserved kidneys (P = NS). There were no significant differences between patient or graft survival. There was an anticipated difference between total preservative volumes used (HTK: 4.1 +/- 1.0 vs UW: 3.0 +/- 0.5; P < .005). CONCLUSION: UW and HTK appear to have similar efficacy in kidney preservation with pulsatile perfusion. HTK preservation solution can be used safely in conjunction with pulsatile preservation for cold storage of renal allografts.     

Living related renal transplantation--the use of advanced age donors

AIM: Efforts to increase the donor pool and available organs included some unconventional kidney transplantation. One of these was including elderly donors for both, living and cadaver kidney transplantation. The aim of the study was to review our single centre experience with living donor transplants from elderly advanced age donors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a period of 7 years, 71 living related renal transplantations were performed. Twenty-six of them were over 65 (mean 69+/-4, range 65 to 81), but 10 were over 70 years of age. The survival rate was compared with 45 transplants from younger donors (mean age 51+/-6, range 24 to 59). The cold and warm ischemia time, the preservation procedure and blood vessels anastomosis time were comparable in both donor groups. The immunosuppression included sequental quadruple protocol with ATG, PRED, AZA and CyA replacing ATG after 7 days. The triple drug (AZA, PRED, CyA) maintenance therapy was applied to all recipients. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier 1-, 3- and 5-year graft survival was 88.0%, 79.2% and 68%, respectively, for advanced donor age group and 90.2%, 82.4% and 74%, respectively, for younger donor group. The difference was slightly statistically significant (p < 0.05). In 6 patients who received graft from elderly donors, a delayed graft function was observed, whereas only in one in the younger donor group. CONCLUSION: Despite the worse results in the elderly donors' transplants, we consider the advanced age donors as an important source of kidneys contributing to solving the actual organ shortage, especially in our region.     

Successful Renal Transplantation in Children With Posterior Urethral Valves

PurposeThe treatment of children with posterior urethral valve (PUV) and end-stage renal disease can be challenging. Some series have had poor outcomes after renal transplantation with an increased risk of graft dysfunction and urinary tract infections. We present our experience with a pediatric population and compare it to all the other pediatric renal transplants done at our institution.Materials and MethodsWe identified 10 patients with PUV who underwent a total of 13 renal transplants between 1990 and 2000. The comparison group included 120 transplants done in 95 patients during the same period. Cumulative allograft survival and function were recorded.ResultsOverall patient survival in the PUV group was 100%. Mean age at transplant in the PUV group was 10.0 years and mean followup was 3.9 years. Six patients underwent high proximal urinary tract diversion, while the remainder had primary transurethral valve ablation. Three patients had bladder augmentation before transplantation. Cumulative allograft survival in the PUV group at 1 and 5 years was 85% and 64%, respectively. Of the 10 patients 9 currently have functioning living related donor transplants. One patient lost 3 cadaveric donor transplants to chronic rejection. No patients lost grafts due to infection or bladder dysfunction. Mean serum creatinine of the functioning grafts was 1.1 mg/dl.ConclusionsRenal transplantation can be performed safely and effectively in patients with PUV, including those who have undergone previous proximal urinary tract diversion. Preoperative bladder management and continued monitoring of bladder and kidney function postoperatively are paramount in the preservation of allograft function.     

Which One Is the Best for Living Donation: A Multiple-Artery Left Kidney Nephrectomy or a Right Kidney Nephrectomy?

IntroductionThe current approach in living-donor kidney transplant is to preserve the best kidney for the donor and harvest the contralateral one. Due to a shorter renal vein and a greater incidence of venous thrombosis, left kidneys are more frequently elected. Notwithstanding, arterial anatomy may be complex and thus render the transplantation procedure more difficult and prone to complications.ObjectivesTo analyze the outcomes after multiple-artery left kidney nephrectomy (MALKN) and right kidney nephrectomy (RKN).ResultsSeventy-three cases were performed from 1999 to 2017 in our institution: 34 MALKN and 39 RKN. The mean operative time was significantly longer in MALKN. Warm ischemia time, donor and receptor hospital stay, and postoperative complications did not differ between groups.There was a positive correlation between renal arteries' ostia distance in MALKN and the duration of warm ischemia period.There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute tubular necrosis, first-year variations in serum creatinine, and glomerular filtration rate between groups. Long-term graft survival did not significantly differ between groups. Three cases of vein thrombosis after RKN were reported with graft loss.ConclusionThe safety and efficacy of MALKN does not differ from RKN, although there appears to be a higher incidence of vein thrombosis after right kidney transplantation. Despite being technically more demanding, particularly in cases with distant artery ostia, MALKN could be a better option than RKN for living donation, expanding the available donor pool, although more studies are needed to affirm this conclusion.     

Predictors and outcomes of delayed graft function after living‐donor kidney transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) following deceased donor kidney transplantation is associated with inferior outcomes. Delayed graft function following living‐donor kidney transplantation is less common, but its impact on graft survival unknown. We therefore sought to determine risk factors for DGF following living‐donor kidney transplantation and DGF's effect on living‐donor kidney graft survival. We analyzed living‐donor kidney transplants performed between 2000 and 2014 in the UNOS dataset. A total of 64 024 living‐donor kidney transplant recipients were identified, 3.6% developed DGF. Cold ischemic time, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, donor age, panel reactive antibody, recipient diabetes, donor and recipient body mass index, recipient race and gender, right nephrectomy, open nephrectomy, dialysis status, ABO incompatibility, and previous transplants were independent predictors of DGF in living‐donor kidney transplants. Five‐year graft survival among living‐donor kidney transplant recipients with DGF was significantly lower compared with graft survival in those without DGF (65% and 85%, respectively, P < 0.001). DGF more than doubled the risk of subsequent graft failure (hazard ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 2.1–2.6; P < 0.001). DGF after living‐donor kidney transplantation is associated with inferior allograft outcomes. Minimizing modifiable risk factors may improve outcomes in living‐donor kidney transplantation.     

Kidney transplantation using living donors over age 65

Efforts to increase the donor pool of available organs have resulted in some unconventional kidney transplantation procedures. One of these is the use of elderly donors for both living and cadaver kidney transplantations. The aim of this study was to review our experience with kidney transplants from living elderly donors. During a period of 10 years, 70 living renal transplantations were performed. In 32 transplants the age of the donor was above 65 years (mean 69 +/- 4 years, range: 65 to 81 years) and in 10 of these 32 transplants the age of the donor was over 70 years. The survival rate was compared with that of 38 transplants from younger donors (mean age 51 +/- 6 years, range: 24 to 59 years). The time to cold and warm ischemia, the preservation procedure and time to anastomosis of blood vessels were comparable in both groups of donors. Immunosuppression included a sequential quadruple protocol, using thymoglobulin (ATG), prednisolone (PRED), azathioprin (AZA) and cyclosporin A (CsA), which replaced ATG/PRED after day seven. A triple drug maintenance therapy (AZA, PRED, CsA) was used in all recipients. Kaplan-Meier survival curves at 1, 3 and 5 years showed that graft survival was 88%, 79% and 64% respectively for grafts from the advanced age donor group and 92%, 82% and 68% respectively for grafts from the younger donor group. The difference was slightly statistically significant (p < 0.05). Functioning of the graft was delayed in six patients who had received grafts from elderly donors and in one patient who had received a graft from a young donor. Despite worse results in transplantation with grafts from elderly donors, we consider this population as an important source of kidneys, which might help solve the present organ shortage, especially in our region.     

Description and Outcomes of Three Different End-to-Side Microsurgical Techniques for the Anastomosis of Accessory Renal Artery With the Dominant Renal Artery in Kidney Transplantation

BackgroundIn this study, we compared the outcomes of three different surgical microscope–assisted end-to-side anastomosis techniques between the dominant and accessory renal arteries during living donor kidney transplant.MethodsThe demographics, serum creatinine levels, warm and cold ischemia times, rate of complications, and incidence of delayed graft function of 135 kidney recipients were analyzed according to the type of arterial anastomosis. Group A (n = 98) had one dominant renal artery (DRA) with one end-to-side anastomosis to the external iliac artery (EIA) using a surgical microscope. Group B (n = 17) had one DRA plus one accessory renal artery (ARA) with two separate end-to-side anastomoses to the EIA using a surgical microscope. Group C (n = 20) had one DRA with end-to-side anastomosis to the EIA and one ARA with an ex vivo on-bench end-to-side anastomosis to the DRA using a surgical microscope.ResultsCompared with groups A and B, the cold ischemia time and the rate of delayed graft function were significantly higher in group C (P ≤ .001). At 6 months after transplant, group B demonstrated a higher creatinine value (2.40 ± 3.41 mg/dL) than group A and group B (P = .032). Also, the decrease in creatinine at postoperative month 6 was limited in group B as compared with groups A and C.ConclusionsAn end-to-side anastomosis between ARA (group B) and DRA (group A) of the kidney graft using a surgical microscope on the bench ex vivo results in superior outcomes. Single arterial anastomosis techniques are associated with a better function in a 6-month follow-up than two separate arterial anastomoses.     

Prognostic value of intraoperative renal tissue oxygenation measurement on early renal transplant function

Ischemia time is a prognostic factor in renal transplantation for postoperative graft function and survival. Kidney transplants from living donors have a higher survival rate than deceased donor kidneys probably because of shorter ischemia time. We hypothesized that measurement of intraoperative kidney oxygenation (μHbO₂) and microvascular perfusion predicts postoperative graft function. We measured microvascular hemoglobin oxygen saturation by reflectance spectrophotometry and microcirculatory kidney perfusion by laser Doppler flowmetry 5 and 30 min after kidney reperfusion on the organ surface in 53 renal transplant patients including 19 grafts from living donors. These values were related to systemic hemodynamics, cold ischemia time (cit), early postoperative graft function and length of hospital stay. μHbO₂ improved 30 min after reperfusion compared to 5 min (from 67% to 71%, P < 0.05). μHbO₂ correlated with mean arterial blood pressure and central venous pH (P < 0.01). Most importantly, μHbO₂ was significantly higher in kidneys from living compared with deceased donors (74% vs. 63%) and in kidneys without vs. with biopsy‐proven postoperative rejection (71% vs. 45%, P < 0.001). Finally, μHbO₂ correlated positively with cit and postoperative creatinine clearance and negatively with postoperative plasma creatinine, need for hemodialysis and length of hospital stay. Our results suggest higher oxygen extraction and thus oxygen demand of the grafts shortly after reperfusion. The intraoperative measurement of tissue oxygenation in kidney transplants is predictive of early postoperative graft function. Future studies should evaluate the potential effect of intraoperative therapeutic maneuvers to improve organ tissue oxygenation in renal transplantation.     

Ischemia times and donor serum creatinine in relation to renal graft failure

BACKGROUND: The results of renal transplantation are dependent on many variables. To simplify the decision process related to a kidney offer, the authors wondered which variables had the most important influence on the graft failure risk. METHODS: All transplant patients (n=1,124) between January 1981 and July 2000 were included in the analysis (2.6% had missing values). The variables included were donor and recipient age and gender, recipient original disease, race, donor origin, current smoking, cardiovascular disease, body weight, peak and current panel reactive antibody (PRA), number of preceding transplants, type and duration of renal replacement therapy, and time since failure of native kidneys. Also, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) identity or not, first and second warm and cold ischemia times, left or right kidney and fossa, donor kidney anatomy, donor serum creatinine and proteinuria, and transplantation year were included. RESULTS: In a multivariate model, cold ischemia time and its time-dependent variable significantly influenced the graft failure risk censored for death (P<0.0001) independent of any of the other risk factors. The influence primarily affected the risk in the first week after transplantation; thereafter, it gradually disappeared during the first year after transplantation. Donor serum creatinine also significantly influenced the graft failure risk in a time-dependent manner (P<0.0001). The risk of a high donor serum creatinine is already enlarged in the immediate postoperative phase and increases thereafter; the curve is closely related to the degree of the elevation. The other variables with a significant influence on the graft failure rate were, in order of decreasing significance, recipient age, donor gender, donor age, HLA identity, transplantation year, preceding transplantations, donor origin, and peak PRA. CONCLUSIONS: Donor serum creatinine and cold ischemia time are important time-dependent variables independently influencing the risk of graft failure censored for death. The best strategy for improving the results of cadaveric transplantations is to decrease the cold ischemia time and to allocate kidneys from donors with an elevated serum creatinine to low-risk recipients.     

Estado actual del trasplante renal en bloque de donante pediátrico en receptor adulto joven

Context and objectivesIn recent years, despite the increased number of kidney transplants performed in Spain, we observed a gradual increase in waiting lists. The need to increase the number of transplants performed in our centers, forces us to accept as donors, pacients previously rejected.Acquiring of evidenceWe performed a systematic review using PubMed of published articles in the last 10 years, that include the words trasplante renal en bloque, «en bloc kidney transplantation» or its initials EBKT.Synthesis of evidenceThe pediatric donor to adult recipient has been included in the expanded criteria donors group, being rejected nevethless such donors in most centers. However, in recent published series comparing the en bloc kindey transplantation from pediatric donor to adult recipients with other transplantated groups, the authors observe similar results between this kind of transplantation and the «optimal» donor group or living kidney donor group, regarding renal function and graft survival, and better results than the transplantated kidneys with expanded criteria donors group.ConclusionsThe results published in the current series lead us to consider this kind of transplant as an option to increase the number of transplants performed.     

The Role of an Interdisciplinary Transplant Team on Living Donation Kidney Transplantation Program

During the last decades, the disparity between the organ supply and the demand for kidney transplantation in Europe has led to consider living donors as a more acceptable option. In the last 7 years, we have established an interdisciplinary supporting transplant team to increase the rate of living donation. After 2001, the new interdisciplinary transplant team consisted of a transplant surgeon, a nephrologist, a pediatrician, a radiologist, a psychologist, a transplant coordinator, and a transplant nurse. We performed a prospective analysis to examine the effect of implementing this team on our living donation program. Demographic data, the annual number of procedures, the duration of waiting, and the cold ischemia time were evaluated among brain-dead and living donors. From January 2002 until December 2008, the number of patients who were annually on the waiting list increased 42% (from 377 to 536 patients). Consequently, the number of the total kidney transplants increased from 81 to 120 with an annual median of 98 cases. By implementing the interdisciplinary transplant team, a significant increase of living kidney donors was observed: from 18 to 42 cases; median = 27). In the last 7 years, a total number of 796 kidney transplants have been performed: 567 from brain-dead and 229 from living donors. In 2001, the waiting list times for recipients who received grafts from brain-dead versus living donors were 1356 versus 615 days respectively. Compared with 2008, the duration on the waiting list decreased significantly for patients receiving a living donor graft, whereas there was a slight increase for the patients in the brain-dead group: brain death versus living donors: 1407 versus 305 days. The interdisciplinary approach has also reduced the cold ischemia time for the living donor recipients: 3 hours and 42 minutes in 2001 versus 2 hours and 50 minutes in 2008. During the last years, by implementing an interdisciplinary transplant team, supporting living donor procedures has produce a gradual increase in the number of kidney transplants from living donors with a remarkable decrease in waiting and cold ischemia times, the latter presumably influencing graft quality.     

Kidney transplant outcomes after medical assistance in dying

IntroductionAfter nearly four years of Canadian experience with medical assistance in dying (MAID), the clinical volume of organ transplantation following MAID remains low. This is the first Canadian report evaluating recipient outcomes from kidney transplantation following MAID.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of the first nine cases of kidney transplants following MAID at a Canadian transplant center.ResultsNine patients underwent MAID followed by kidney retrieval during the study period. Their diagnoses were largely neuromuscular diseases. The mean warm ischemic time was 20 minutes (standard deviation [SD] 7). The nine recipients had a mean age of 60 (SD 19.7). The mean cold ischemic time was 525 minutes (SD 126). Delayed graft function occurred in only one patient out of nine. The mean 30-day creatinine was 124 umol/L (SD 52). The mean three-month creatinine was 115 umol/L (SD 29).ConclusionsWe report nine cases of kidney transplantation following MAID. The process minimized warm ischemia, resulting in low delayed graft function rates, and acceptable post-transplant outcomes. Further large-scale research is necessary to optimize processes and outcomes in this novel clinical pathway.     

心肾联合移植的现状

对同时患有终末期心脏和肾脏疾病的患者 ,心肾联合移植 (CHKT)是一种切实可行的选择 ,术后疗效良好。该手术的适应证为合并由器质性肾脏疾病导致的肾功能衰竭的心脏移植患者 ,合并严重心功能不全的肾移植患者。CHKT术后心脏移植排斥发生率较单纯心脏移植术低 ,但机制尚不确定 ;肾移植排斥发生率较单纯肾移植术显著降低 ,这可能与较短的冷缺血时间和较强的免疫抑制治疗有关。行 CHKT患者的生存率与单纯心脏移植者无明显差别。若严格把握手术适应证 ,CHKT术可在临床上安全、合理地应用 ,但移植物和患者的长期存活率还有待多中心的进一步观察。     

The “oldest and coldest” shipped living donor kidneys transplanted through kidney paired donation

To date, thousands of living donor kidneys have been shipped through kidney paired donation (KPD). To expand on this growing segment of living donor transplantation, we evaluated the effect of advanced age donation (“oldest kidneys”) and prolonged cold ischemia time (“coldest kidneys”) on graft function and survival using the National Kidney Registry database from February 2008 to May 2018. Donors were stratified by age at time of donation (<65 or ≥65 years) and kidneys were stratified by cold ischemia time (<16 or ≥16 hours). We evaluated delayed graft function and death‐censored graft failure (DCGF) for up to seven posttransplant years. Of the 2363 shipped living donor kidney transplants, 4.1% of donors were ≥65 years and 6.0% of transplanted kidneys had cold ischemia times ≥16 hours. Delayed graft function and DCGF occurred in 5.2% and 4.7% of cases. There were no significant associations between delayed graft function and donor age (P = .947) or cold ischemia (P = .532). Donor age and cold ischemia time were not predictive of delayed graft function (OR = 0.86,1.20; P = .8, .6) or DCGF (HR = 1.38,0.35, P = .5, .1). These findings may alleviate concerns surrounding the utilization of kidneys from older donors or those originating from distant transplant centers.     

Rabbit anti‐rat thymocyte immunoglobulin preserves renal function during ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat kidney transplantation

Ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is an important cause of renal graft dysfunction in humans. Increases in cold and warm ischemia times lead to a higher risk of early post‐transplant complications including delayed graft function and acute rejection. Moreover, prolonged cold ischemia is a predictor of long‐term kidney graft loss. The protective effect of rabbit anti‐rat thymocyte immunoglobulin (rATG) was evaluated in a rat model of I/R injury following syngeneic kidney transplantation. Serum creatinine concentration was evaluated at 16 h and 24 h post‐transplant. Animals were sacrificed 24 h post‐transplant for evaluation of histology, infiltrating leukocytes, nitrotyrosine staining, and apoptosis. rATG was effective in preventing renal function impairment, tissue damage and tubular apoptosis associated with I/R only when was given 2 h before transplantation but not at the time of reperfusion. Pretransplant rATG treatment of recipient animals effectively reduced the amount of macrophages, CD4⁺, CD8⁺ T cells and LFA‐1⁺ cells infiltrating renal graft subjected to cold ischemia as well as granzyme‐B expression within ischemic kidney. On the other hand, granulocyte infiltration and oxidative stress were not modified by rATG. If these results will be translated into the clinical setting, pretransplant administration of Thymoglobuline^® could offer the additional advantage over peri‐transplant administration of limiting I/R‐mediated kidney graft damage.     

Novel Organ Perfusion and Preservation Strategies in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death in Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation

BackgroundKidney and pancreatic transplants from controlled donation after circulatory death donors are vulnerable to ischemia-reperfusion injuries. In this context of transplant shortage, there is a need to optimize the function of these transplants and to develop novel perfusion and preservation strategies in controlled donation after circulatory death in kidney and pancreatic transplants.In Situ Perfusion and Preservation StrategiesIn situ regional normothermic perfusion improves the outcome of kidney transplants from controlled donation after circulatory death and provides equivalent results for the kidney from brain-dead donors. In situ regional normothermic perfusion is under investigation for pancreatic transplants.Ex Situ Perfusion and Preservation StrategiesPerfusion on hypothermic machine perfusion is highly recommended for the kidney from controlled donation after cardiac death. Hypothermic oxygenated perfusion machine decreases the rate of graft rejection and graft failure in kidney transplantation. Ex situ normothermic perfusion is an easy way to assess renal function. In the future, kidney transplants could benefit from drug therapy during ex situ normothermic perfusion. In pancreas transplantation, hypothermic machine perfusion and ex situ normothermic perfusion present encouraging results in preclinical studies.     

Long-term outcomes of retransplantation after live donor liver transplantation: A Western experience

BackgroundDespite most liver transplants in North America being from deceased donors, the number of living donor liver transplants has increased over the last decade. Although outcomes of liver retransplantation after deceased donor liver transplantation have been widely published, outcomes of retransplant after living donor liver transplant need to be further elucidated.MethodWe aimed to compare waitlist outcomes and survival post-retransplant in recipients of initial living or deceased donor grafts. Adult liver recipients relisted at University Health Network between April 2000 and October 2020 were retrospectively identified and grouped according to their initial graft: living donor liver transplants or deceased donor liver transplant. A competing risk multivariable model evaluated the association between graft type at first transplant and outcomes after relisting. Survival after retransplant waitlisting (intention-to-treat) and after retransplant (per protocol) were also assessed. Multivariable Cox regression evaluated the effect of initial graft type on survival after retransplant.ResultsA total of 201 recipients were relisted (living donor liver transplants, n = 67; donor liver transplants, n = 134) and 114 underwent retransplant (living donor liver transplants, n = 48; deceased donor liver transplants, n = 66). The waitlist mortality with an initial living donor liver transplant was not significantly different (hazard ratio = 0.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–1.10; P = .08). Both unadjusted and adjusted graft loss risks were similar post-retransplant. The risk-adjusted overall intention-to-treat survival after relisting (hazard ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.44–1.32; P = .30) and per protocol survival after retransplant (hazard ratio:1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.54–4.19; P = .40) were equivalent in those who initially received a living donor liver transplant.ConclusionPatients requiring relisting and retransplant after either living donor liver transplants or deceased donor liver transplantation experience similar waitlist and survival outcomes.     

Pediatric Kidney Transplantation—Living or Deceased Donor?

BackgroundKidney transplantation is ideal for children and adolescents with chronic end-stage renal disease because it offers better growth, development, and quality of life. Donor choice is vitally important in this age group, given the long life expectancy of these patients.MethodsA retrospective analysis of pediatric patients (<18 years) who underwent kidney transplantation from January 1999 to December/2018 was performed. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between living and deceased donor transplants.ResultsWe included 59 pediatric kidney transplant recipients, 12 from a living donor and 47 from a deceased donor. Thirty-six (61.0%) patients were boys, and 5 (8.5%) had a retransplant. There were no differences between groups on sex, race, and weight of the recipient and donor, as well as the age and the etiology of the recipient's primary disease. Most recipients received induction immunosuppression with basiliximab and maintenance with triple therapy, with no differences between groups. Living donor transplants were mostly pre-emptive (58.3% vs 4.3%, P < .001) and had fewer HLA mismatches (≤3: 90.9% vs 13.0%, P < .001), older donors (38.4 vs 24.3 years, P < .001) and shorter hospital stays (8.8 vs 14.1 days, P = .004). There were no statistically significant differences regarding medical-surgical complications and graft or patient survival. However, we found that at 13 years post-transplant 91.7% of the living donor grafts were functioning vs 72.3% of the deceased donor grafts.ConclusionOur experience points out that a living donor graft in pediatric patients is associated with a higher probability of pre-emptive transplant, shorter hospital stay, greater HLA compatibility, and increased graft survival.     

Outcomes of shipped live donor kidney transplants compared with traditional living donor kidney transplants

The disparity between kidney transplant candidates and donors necessitates innovations to increase organ availability. Transporting kidneys allows for living donors and recipients to undergo surgery with a familiar transplant team, city, friends, and family. The effect of shipping kidneys and prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) with living donor transplantation outcomes is not clearly known. This retrospective matched (age, gender, race, and year of procedure) cohort study compared allograft outcomes for shipped live donor kidney transplants and nonshipped living donor kidney transplants. Fifty‐seven shipped live donor kidneys were transplanted from 31 institutions in 26 cities. The mean shipping distance was 1634 miles (range 123–2811) with mean CIT of 12.1 ± 2.8 h. The incidence of delayed graft function in the shipped cohort was 1.8% (1/57) compared to 0% (0/57) in the nonshipped cohort. The 1‐year allograft survival was 98% in both cohorts. There were no significant differences between the mean serum creatinine values or the rates of serum creatinine decline in the immediate postoperative period even after adjusted for gender and differences in recipient and donor BMI. Despite prolonged CITs, outcomes for shipped live donor kidney transplants were similar when compared to matched nonshipped living donor kidney transplants.