Lung Transplantation for Cystic Fibrosis and Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Single-Center Experience

ObjectivesLung transplantation is a well-established treatment for selected patients with advanced cystic fibrosis (CF)- and non-cystic fibrosis (non-CF)--related bronchiectasis. Because the number of lung transplants performed for patients with non-CF bronchiectasis is much smaller than for patients with CF, little data is available regarding patient selection, choice of procedure, and outcomes.MethodsBetween November 1997 and December 2013, 42 patients with CF and 33 patients with non-CF bronchiectasis underwent lung transplantation at the Rabin Medical Center, Israel. We analyzed and compared pretransplant evaluation data and short- and long-term results in both groups.ResultsMedian survival for the CF group in our study was 8.4 years, compared with 7.1 years for the non-CF group (P = .098), similarly to that reported by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry data. The main survival difference between groups was in the early postoperative period. Both groups achieved similar peak forced expiratory volume in 1 second values and had stable lung function at the 3-year follow-up. Biopsy-proven rates of acute cellular rejection were low for both groups. Rates of chronic lung allograft dysfunction development did not differ between CF and non-CF recipients.ConclusionOur institutional experience confirms that lung transplantation is feasible for non-CF bronchiectasis, and results are comparable to our CF cohort. The increased early mortality in this study occurred from 1999 to 2008 and was probably related to surgical techniques used at the time. Overall, 3-year and 5-year survival were comparable with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry data. Non-CF bronchiectasis patients achieved and maintained satisfactory lung function.     

Lung Transplantation With Grafts From Elderly Donors: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction

Use of extended criteria donors is one of the strategies to face the scarcity of donors for lung transplantation.

Methods

Between November 2002 and May 2009, we performed 52 LTs in 50 recipients, 10 of whom (group A) received lungs from donors aged 55 years or older (median, 58.5; range, 56-66 years) for comparison with 28 patients (group B) transplanted with lungs from donors younger than 55 years (median, 25.5; range, 15-54 years). We excluded 9 children and 3 recipients of combined liver plus lung transplantations from the study.

Results

Recipient age, gender, and indications for transplantation did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. Neither were there significant differences in PaO2/FiO2 ratios before lung retrieval, or length of the ischemic time The first PaO2/FiO2 on arrival to the intensive care unit (ICU) and the median length of ICU stay were similar. All patients, except 2 who died in the operating theatre, were extubated between 3 and 216 hours after the transplantation. Hospital mortality was similar in both groups: 3 patients in group A and 2 in group B (P = .1). The median portions of the predicted 1-second forced expiratory volume (FEV1) at 6 months after transplantation did not differ in the 2 groups: 62.4% in group A versus 70% in group B (P = .85).

Conclusion

Lung grafts from donors older than 55 years can be effectively used for transplantation, thus increasing the total organ pool.     

Combined Pulmonary Fibrosis and Emphysema

The combination of pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a recently defined syndrome, in which an upper lobe emphysema and lower lobe fibrosis coexist in a single patient. These patients have a characteristic lung function profile, with apparently normal or minimally altered dynamic and static lung volumes, contrasting with a significant reduction of carbon monoxide transfer (DLco), and hypoxemia, which worsens with exercise. Pulmonary hypertension is highly prevalent and is the principal negative prognostic factor for this condition. High resolution computed axial tomography (HRCT) is the main tool to confirm the diagnosis. Cigarette smoking has been proposed as the main factor in its etiology; however, neither pathogenic mechanisms nor the sequence of events involved in this syndrome has been clarified yet. Experimental studies in animal models are providing information on the involvement of some inflammatory mediators in the pathogenesis. There is currently no consensus on the therapeutic approach to be followed in these patients, since the studies published to date on this subject are limited to wellcharacterized series of cases. Therefore, it is a pathology with many unknowns yet to be resolved and highly likely to be underdiagnosed, unless its functional clinical characteristics are taken into account.     

Combined Heart-Lung-Liver Transplantation for Patients With Cystic Fibrosis: The Australian Experience

BackgroundCombined multivisceral transplantation has emerged as a therapeutic option for a select patient cohort; however, clinical decision-making remains complex and controversial. The aim of this study was to examine patient characteristics, operative complications, and long-term outcomes of all patients who have undergone combined heart-lung-liver transplantation (HLLTx) in Australia.MethodsIn this study, we performed a retrospective analysis of all adult patients who have undergone combined HLLTx in Australia to date. Recipient clinical characteristics, waitlist, and transplant outcomes are described.ResultsEight adult patients have received HLLTx at a single Australian transplant center. Recipients of HLLTx have typically been young (median age, 30.1 years; range, 24-37), underweight (median body mass index, 19.8 kg/m²; range, 16.2-30.4) patients with cystic fibrosis (n = 8, 100%) with severe airflow obstruction (median forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration, 24% predicted; range, 17%-48%) accompanied by liver cirrhosis confirmed on histopathology (n = 8, 100%). Despite relative preservation of synthetic function and low model for end-stage liver disease scores (median, 8; range, 6-17), all recipients had complications of portal hypertension prior to transplantation, with many patients having suffered life-threatening variceal hemorrhage. In this cohort, HLLTx was associated with overall posttransplant survival of 87.5% at 30 days, 71.4% at 1 year, and 42.9% at 5 years. Listing for combined HLLTx was associated with prolonged waitlist times relative to bilateral sequential single-lung transplantation (median 556 vs 56 days, respectively), however waitlist mortality and/or delisting was comparable between groups.ConclusionsTaken together, these findings highlight the opportunities and challenges facing combined (heart-) lung and liver transplantation in patients with multiorgan failure.     

Outcome of Renal Transplantation in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundAn increasing proportion of kidney recipients have diabetes mellitus (DM). Some concerns have been raised about the kidney transplantation results in diabetic patients. Therefore, we assessed the effect of DM on morbidity and mortality of diabetic patients with renal transplantation.MethodsWe retrospectively studied adult patients with and without DM who underwent living donor transplantation between 2007 and 2016. Information concerning demographic and clinical data were retrospectively analyzed by reviewing the patient files.ResultsOf the 1536 transplant recipients, 126 (8%) had diabetes mellitus (mean age 49.4 ± 11.8) and 525 patients were evaluated in the non-diabetic control group (mean age 36.2 ± 15.9). The diabetic and non-diabetic patient groups had a mean follow-up after kidney transplantation 42.5 months (0.27-101.7 months) and 58.8 ± 10.6 months, respectively. In the diabetic patient group, only 3 patients had lost graft and 13 patients were exitus. Three patients had lost graft and 5 patients were exitus in non-diabetic patient group. Cardiac death (54.5%) was the most common cause of mortality in diabetic group. The 6-year patient and graft survival rates are 84.9% and 95.3%; 97.5% and 97.2% in the diabetic and non-diabetic patient groups, respectively.ConclusionsBoth infection and cardiovascular diseases increase morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients with diabetes mellitus. The mortality risk of diabetic patients after renal transplantation is higher than the non-diabetic kidney recipients. Therefore, diabetic patients need meticulous cardiac evaluation before renal transplantation and a close follow-up, in terms of infection, after transplantation.     

Outcomes of Paired-Exchange Live-Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

IntroductionPaired-exchange kidney transplantation (PEKT) enables recipients with willing but incompatible donors to find potential matches from a larger pool of donors. It involves transportation of donor kidneys to the intended recipient with a consequent increase in the cold ischemia time (CIT).Patients and MethodsOur single-center study compared the outcomes of PEKT versus traditional in-center live-donor kidney transplants (ICKT). Retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent PEKT and ICKT from January 2009 to February 2012 at our institution was performed. Delayed graft function, acute rejection rates, incidence of proteinuria, trends in serum creatinine, and graft and patient survival rates were compared between groups.ResultsBaseline demographic data were similar between the PEKT group (n = 15) and the ICKT group (n = 30) except that CIT (13.1 vs 3.8 hours; P < .001) and panel reactive antibody titers (12.6% ± 22.9% vs 0.9% ± 4.9%; P = .01) were significantly higher in the PEKT group. No patient developed delayed graft function. At a median follow-up of 12.4 months (range: 2–27.5 months), graft and patient survival rates were 100% in both groups. Serial creatinine levels were similar between the groups. There were no significant differences between groups in acute rejection rates (3 of 15 vs 3 of 30) and development of proteinuria posttransplantation (8 of 15 vs 22 of 30).ConclusionsOur study found similar outcomes between the PEKT and ICKT groups despite longer CIT and higher panel reactive antibody titers in the PEKT group. These findings support the current practice of PEKT with transporting of donor kidneys, with the resultant increase in the chances of living-donor kidney transplantation.     

High-Urgency Renal Transplantation for Patients With Vascular Access Failure: A Single-Center Experience

In the face of access failure for renal replacement therapy or severe complications despite or due to dialysis, high-urgency renal transplant (HU-RT) allocation is possible. Vascular access failure patients have multiple comorbidities and a higher risk of cardiovascular and thrombotic events. Thus, it is presumed that graft and patient survivals might be worse for these patients.The aim of this paper was to analyze the characteristics and outcomes of HU-RT patients due to access failure for renal replacement therapy when comparing them to a population of deceased-donor renal transplant (DDRT) patients.We analyzed data from our Renal Transplantation Unit from January 2006 to April 2017. In this period, 374 patients had a renal transplant. Of these, 11 patients received a high-urgency deceased-donor renal transplant (HU-DDRT).Compared with patients who had a DDRT, HU-DDRT patients were predominantly female (54.5% vs 43.5%, P = .007) and younger (41.6 ± 7.9 vs 49.4 ± 11.8, P = .031). HU-DDRT patients were not significantly more sensitized than DDRT (14.1 ± 27.4 vs 13.5 ± 24.1, P = .935), and had a comparable number of HLA mismatches (3.4 ± 1.4 vs 3.6 ± 1.2, P = .343). Despite the higher incidence in hypertensive (90.9 vs 73.5%, P = .196) and diabetic patients (27.3% vs 15.7%, P = .305) in the HU-DDRT group, this difference was not statistically significant. The percentage of retransplantation was similar in both groups (9.1% vs 7.2%, P = .808). Donor sex, age, and baseline serum creatinine were similar between the groups. There was an increased proportion of expanded criteria donors in HU-DDRT (54.5% vs 25.1%, P = .028).There were no differences in cold or warm ischemia time nor in serum creatinine at discharge or during the first 2 years of follow-up. In both groups, a similar proportion of patients experienced acute rejection episodes. Comparable to DDRT patients, HU-DDRT patients had a high proportion of graft survival at the 1-year follow-up (90.9% vs 93.1%, P = .777). At a 2-year follow-up, graft survival was lower in the HU-DDRT group (81.8% vs 91.5%, P = .267).Mean follow-up for both groups was comparable (78.5 ± 46.7 vs 68.4 ± 40.8 months, P = .424). Overall, graft loss occurred in approximately 36.4% of HU-DDRT patients and 20.9% of DDRT patients (P = .219). Both groups had an overall mortality rate of around 9%. The differences were not statistically significant due to the limited number of patients.More comorbidities and reportedly worse cardiovascular prognosis of access failure (AF) patients and use of expanded criteria donors did not negatively reflect in worse short-term outcomes in our cohort, which highlights the importance of HU-RT in prolonging the survival of AF patients.     

Results of Lung Transplantation in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis

Lung transplantation (LT) is the only available option for patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) with end-stage lung disease. We reviewed our experience with LT in patients with end-stage CF (CFLT) to identify variables associated with survival and to compare the results with other indications for LT (OILT). Between October 1993 and October 2007, we performed 259 consecutive LTs in 250 patients for treatment of various end-stage pulmonary conditions. The indications for LT were CF in 78 patients idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in 76, COPD in 64, bronchiectasis in 11, alfa-1-antitrypsin deficit in 5, primary pulmonary hypertension in 4, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome in 4, and other indications in 11. Our study group comprised 78 patients with CF (30.11%) (CFLT). We observed significant differences in the actuarial survival between the CFLT and OILT groups. Perioperative mortality and the incidence of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome were comparable in both groups. We found that in patients with CF, LT performed under urgency code (mechanical ventilation) showed no significant difference from LT performed electively insofar as long-term survival, early death, or perioperative death. The functional results in the CFLT group were excellent. We observed significant improvement in PaO₂, PaCO₂, forced vital capacity, and forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration at 6, 12, and 36 months compared with the pretransplantation baseline values.     

Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation Recipients With Hepatitis in the Antiviral Therapy Era: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction

The use of organs from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)+ donors could increase the donor pool substantially. However, fulminant hepatic failure requiring urgent liver transplantation or resulting in death has been reported in recipients of HBsAg+ renal transplantation (KT) in pre-nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) era. With effective antiviral therapies such as NAs, it seems feasible to transplant such recipients more safely. To address this issue, we conducted a retrospective, cohort study to evaluate the safety and long-term risks of HBsAg+ KT recipients in the NA era.

Methods

From December 2006 to January 2013, 112 patients undergoing KT were followed at our institute. We analyzed patient and graft outcomes, hepatitis status (HBsAg status, hepatitis B virus [HBV] DNA level, liver function tests, presence of hepatitis C virus [HCV] co-infection), and graft source (domestic or transplant tourism).

Results

Ninety-two KT recipients were still alive. Nine patients were died of nonhepatic factors. Among 112 patients, there were 19 of 92 recipients alive who were HBsAg+, including 6 patients with HBV and HCV dual infections. Two of 19 patients experienced symptomatic hepatitis, one de novo and the other re-activation. Liver functions of these 2 recipients recovered progressively after introduction of NAs. No recipients in our study had experienced graft loss at the time of analysis.

Conclusion

In terms of patient survival and quality of life, KT seems be a safe and feasible therapy of choice for HBsAg+ patients with end-stage renal disease. Infection is easier to prevent than to treat. KT recipients at high risk for HBV reactivation and for complications of HBV, with or without HCV co-infection, may benefit from longer prophylaxis. However, the optimal duration of prophylaxis remains unclear. Furthermore, several issues needed to be solved for clinical concerns, such as frequency and intensity of adverse effects, high costs, increased pill burden, drug–drug interactions, and the emergence of viral resistance variants.     

Long-Term Outcome of Renal Transplantation in Patients With Familial Mediterranean Fever Amyloidosis: A Single-Center Experience

IntroductionFamilial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an autosomal-recessive disorder, affecting multiple organs. The AA type of amyloidosis is most common and serious complication cause nephropathy and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Renal transplantation (RTX) remains treatment of choice for ESRD. We aimed to investigate long-term results of RTX in patients with FMF amyloidosis.Patients and MethodsWe compared the outcomes of 18 patients (12 men and 6 women) with FMF amyloidosis among 601 (2.9%) transplants with 200 control patients. Demographic data and gene analysis were evaluated.ResultsIn our study the 1-year graft and patient survivals were 94.44% and 100%, respectively. At 5 years after RTX, they were 94.73% and 88.88%, respectively, in the FMF group without difference from controls. Mean creatinine level at 1 and 5 years were 1.43 ± 0.54 and 1.73 ± 0.89, respectively. The results of MEFV mutation analyses were: M694V/M694V homozygote in 1 patient, M694V/EQ148 in 3, M694V/V726A in 2, 680M-I/E148Q in 3, M694V/M680I in 5, R202Q/M680I in 2, and M694V/R202Q in 2. Recurrence was noticed in 1 patient with M694V/M680I. One patient died because of graft loss and cardiac complications with M694V/M680I gene analysis. Colchicine was reduced in 4 patients owing to side effects.ConclusionLong-term outcomes of transplantation in patients with amyloidosis secondary to FMF is similar to that in the general transplant population and maintenance colchicine, even after decreasing its dose, effectively prevents recurrence of amyloidosis in the allograft.     

Lung Transplantation in Pulmonary Fibrosis: Challenging Early Outcomes Counterbalanced by Surprisingly Good Outcomes Beyond 15 Years

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) has been reported to have a poor outcome following lung transplantation due to difficulties getting ill recipients to transplantation and challenging early postoperative outcomes. To assess long-term outcomes for this cohort, we performed a retrospective 18-year chart review of all ILD lung transplant recipients. ILD single (SLT) and bilateral sequential lung transplantations (BSLT) were compared with all other lung transplant patients and International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Registry data over the same time period. Of 585 lung transplantations, 90 (15%) were ILD (53 SLT, 37 BSLT); 67 (74%) were idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 9 (10%) were sarcoidosis, 9 (10%) were lymphangioleiomyomatosis, and 5 (6%) had other indications. Mean age was 52 years (range, 34-69 years). Actuarial survival at 1, 5, 10, 15, and 18 years compared favorably to all other lung transplantations performed (77% vs 83%, 51% vs 50%, 42% vs 26%, 28% vs 17%, and 28% vs 8%, respectively). IPF actuarial survival at 1, 5, and 10 years appeared superior to ISHLT Registry data (76% vs 72%, 50% vs 44%, and 34% vs 20%, respectively). There was equivocal survival between SLT and BSLT at 1, 5, and 10 years (78% vs 68%, 49% vs 50%, and 29% vs 50%, respectively). Our ILD figures compared favorably to lung transplantation for other diseases and international standards, while survival from SLT was as successful as BSLT both in the short and the longer term. Consideration should be given to utilizing SLT to maximize the allocation of donor lungs and to decrease waiting list mortality associated with IPF.     

Renal Transplantation in High Immunological Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundRenal transplantation (RT) in high-risk patients is increasingly performed due to an inadequate organ pool and increased rate of RT after a failed transplantation. Safety and prognosis of RT in such patients with high risk is an ongoing debate. Herein we aimed to present our single-center experience on RT of high-risk patients.MethodsA total of 89 consecutive RT patients were included into this study in a 10-month period. Patients were divided into 3 groups: the low-risk group (n = 47) with negative panel reactive antibody (PRA), medium-risk group (n = 18) with positive PRA but mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) < 2000, and high-risk group (n = 24) with positive PRA and MFI >2000 or donor specific antibody (DSA) positivity. Groups were compared in terms of demographic features, serum creatinine levels, acute rejection rates, delayed graft function (DGF), and patient or graft loss.ResultsAge of the recipients were similar between the groups. Desensitization (7% vs 11% vs 42%, respectively, in low-, medium-, and high-risk groups; P = .001), plasmapheresis (6% vs 11% vs 46%, respectively, P < .001), and rituximab treatments (0% vs 0% vs 25%, respectively, P < .001) were significantly more frequently performed in high-risk patients. Serum creatinine levels at 1 month and 6 months after RT were similar between the groups (P = .43 and P = .71, respectively). Rates of acute rejection (6% vs 6% vs 16%, respectively, P = .52) and DGF (9% vs 11% vs 29%, respectively, P = .15) were similar between the groups. Frequencies of loss of patient or graft were also similar (0% vs 6% vs 4%, P = .15).ConclusionRT may be successfully performed in high-risk patients without an increase in the risk of acute rejection, DGF, or patient/graft loss.     

Kidney Transplantation in Korean Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease Aged 65 and Older: A Single-Center Experience

Background

The mean age of patients starting dialysis in Korea has increased to older than 60 years and the proportion of patients aged 65 and older exceeded 40% in 2014. Although the number of elderly dialysis patients is increasing rapidly, percentages of elderly patients undergoing kidney transplantation (KT) are very low.

Results of Lung Transplantations Among Cystic Fibrosis Patients: A Single-Center Study

BackgroundLung transplantation remains the ultimate treatment for patients who have exhausted all other therapeutic options in the course of end-stage lung disease due to cystic fibrosis (CF). The aim of the study was to assess the results of lung transplantations performed via mini-thoracotomy in a single center.MethodsThis retrospective study assesses the survival and need for reoperation among 56 primary lung transplant recipients due to CF in a single center between 2018 and 2021. Intraoperative death was also assessed, yet it was established as an exclusion criterion for the post-transplant survival analysis.ResultsOnly one patient died intraoperatively (1.79%). Reoperation at an early postoperative stage was required among 2 patients (3.58%), due to vascular complication for one and pulmonary leakage for the other. Mortality at 30 days was 0%. In-hospital mortality was low (3.58%). Survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was respectively 87%, 85%, and 75%. Mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second as a percentage of predicted value at discharge was approximately 60% and did not decrease after 12 and 24 months. Mean BMI at 12-month follow-up was 20.11 (range, 13-28.7) with 71.4% of patients being qualified as presenting within the normal range of 18.5 to 24.9.Conclusions. Double lung transplantation is a safe and feasible surgical option. Despite being more technically difficult and challenging than clamshell approach for surgeons, it is more beneficial for patients.     

Long-Term Follow-up Results of Renal Transplantation in Pediatric Patients With Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction and AimFocal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a common cause of end-stage renal disease in children. We analyzed the long-term outcome of pediatric patients with FSGS undergoing renal transplantation. The objective of the study is to report the experience of a single center and determine the incidence of recurrence, rejection, graft loss, and related risk factors.Materials and MethodThis retrospective cohort study was performed between 1991 and 2018. Thirty patients with a pathologic diagnosis of primary FSGS were included in the study. The patients were diagnosed with FSGS according to histologic features in biopsies.ResultsTwenty-one of the donors were deceased (70%) and 9 were alive (30%). FSGS recurred in only 2 patients. Graft loss occurred in 6 patients (20%). The causes of graft loss were chronic rejection in 4 patients and acute rejection in 2. Our graft survival rate was 100% at 1 year, 91% at 5 years, 80% at 10 years, 70% at 15 years, and 42% at 20 years. Five- and 10-year graft survival rates were 83% and 83% in living donors and 94% and 79% in deceased donors, respectively. According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in terms of graft survival between living and deceased donors.ConclusionThis study, with its contribution to literature in terms of long follow-up of FSGS patients from childhood to adulthood, is important. However, further studies are required.