Dual Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience in Thailand

Background

Dual kidney transplants (DKTs) from expanded criteria donors (ECDs) have been performed in our hospital since 2014. We needed to review our clinical outcome and update criteria to selected ECDs for DKTs.

Single-Center Experience in Double Kidney Transplantation

Use of organs from marginal donors for transplantation is a current strategy to expand the organ donor pool. Its efficacy is universally accepted among data from multicenter studies. Herein, we have reviewed outcomes of double kidney transplantation (DKT) over an 9-year experience in our center. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible important differences between a monocenter versus multicenter studies. Between 1999 and 2008, we performed 59 DKT. Recipient mean age was 63 ± 5 years. Mean HLA-A, -B, and -DR mismatches were 3.69 ± 0.922. Donor mean age was 69 ± 7 years and mean creatinine clearance was 69.8 ± 30.8 mL/min. Proteinuria was detected in three donors (5%). Mean cold ischemia and warm ischemia times were 1130 ± 216 and 48 ± 11 minutes, respectively. The right and left kidney scores were 4.18 ± 2 and 4.21 ± 2, respectively. Thirty patients (51%) displayed good postoperative renal function; 22 (37%), acute tubular necrosis with postoperative dialysis; 3 (5%), acute rejection episodes; 4 (7%), single-graft transplantectomy due to vascular thrombosis; 1 (2%), a retransplantation; 5 (8%), a lymphocele; 3 (5%) vescicoureteral reflux or stenosis requiring surgical correction. Cytomegalovirus infection was detected in five patients (8%). In three patients (5%) displayed de novo neoplasia. Three patients showed chronic rejection (5%), whereas we observed a cyclosporine-related toxicity in 7 (12%). Nine patients (15%) developed iatrogenic diabetes. Patient and graft survivals after 3 years from DKT were 93% and 86.3%, respectively. In this study, we applied successfully a widespread score to allocate organs to single kidney transplantation or DKT. In our experience, the score is suitable for the organ allocation but it may be overprotective, excluding potentially suitable organs for a single transplantation.     

Kidney Transplantation in Elderly Recipients: A Single-Center Experience

In this retrospective single-center study we evaluated the outcome after kidney transplant in recipients older than 65 years in terms of patient and graft survival and causes of death.

Outcomes of Paired-Exchange Live-Donor Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

IntroductionPaired-exchange kidney transplantation (PEKT) enables recipients with willing but incompatible donors to find potential matches from a larger pool of donors. It involves transportation of donor kidneys to the intended recipient with a consequent increase in the cold ischemia time (CIT).Patients and MethodsOur single-center study compared the outcomes of PEKT versus traditional in-center live-donor kidney transplants (ICKT). Retrospective chart review of adult patients who underwent PEKT and ICKT from January 2009 to February 2012 at our institution was performed. Delayed graft function, acute rejection rates, incidence of proteinuria, trends in serum creatinine, and graft and patient survival rates were compared between groups.ResultsBaseline demographic data were similar between the PEKT group (n = 15) and the ICKT group (n = 30) except that CIT (13.1 vs 3.8 hours; P < .001) and panel reactive antibody titers (12.6% ± 22.9% vs 0.9% ± 4.9%; P = .01) were significantly higher in the PEKT group. No patient developed delayed graft function. At a median follow-up of 12.4 months (range: 2–27.5 months), graft and patient survival rates were 100% in both groups. Serial creatinine levels were similar between the groups. There were no significant differences between groups in acute rejection rates (3 of 15 vs 3 of 30) and development of proteinuria posttransplantation (8 of 15 vs 22 of 30).ConclusionsOur study found similar outcomes between the PEKT and ICKT groups despite longer CIT and higher panel reactive antibody titers in the PEKT group. These findings support the current practice of PEKT with transporting of donor kidneys, with the resultant increase in the chances of living-donor kidney transplantation.     

Kidney Transplantation Using Elderly Non-Heart-Beating Donors: A Single-Center Experience

Although acceptable outcomes have been reported in both non-heart-beating (NHB) and elderly donors individually, the large pool of elderly NHB donors has not yet been fully utilized. In 1994, we expanded our transplant protocol to include NHB donors aged over 65 years and this study compares the clinical outcomes with regular NHB transplantations. Up to June 2005, 24 patients were transplanted at our center with kidneys from NHB donors aged 65 years or more, whereas 176 patients received grafts from conventional NHB donors during the same period. Grafts from older donors were associated with inferior glomerular filtration rates (29 vs. 44 mL/min after 1 year, p = 0.01) and graft survival (52% vs. 68% after 5 years, p = 0.19) compared to younger NHB donor grafts, although the difference in graft survival was not statistically significant. Exclusion of older NHB donor kidneys with severe vascular pathology resulted in similar graft survival of older and younger NHB donor kidneys. We conclude that the use of elderly NHB donors in order to expand the donor pool was associated with unacceptable clinical outcomes and cannot be justified without further refinement in their selection, for example, by histological assessment of pretransplant biopsies.     

Late Ureteral Stenosis After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

In a retrospective study, we analyzed 1419 consecutive kidney transplantation procedures performed at a single center to identify potential predictive factors of ureteral stenosis. Only stenosis observed after the first month posttransplantation was considered. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to analyze donor age and serum creatinine concentration before procurement, recipient age, cold ischemia time, delayed graft function, number of renal arteries, and presence of a double-J stent. Follow-up evaluation included number and timing of acute rejection episodes, cytomegalovirus infection, acute pyelonephritis, renal function, and patient death. Ureteral stenosis developed in 45 patients (3.17%), and was correlated with donor age older than 65 years (P = .001), kidneys with more than 2 arteries (P = .009), and delayed graft function (P = .02). The data suggest a potential protective role of donor age, number of renal arteries, and delayed graft function in development of ureteral stenosis after kidney transplantation.     

Impact of Double-J Ureteric Stent in Kidney Transplantation: Single-Center Experience

We retrospectively evaluated the use of double-j stent and the incidence of urological complications in 2 groups of patients who received a kidney transplant. From January 2005 to September 2007 we studied 172 patients receiving kidney transplants, 65 and 107 from living and cadaver donors, respectively. From the 172 patients, a total of 34 were excluded due to ureterostomy or Politano-Leadbetter ureterovesical anastomosis. Another 21 patients were excluded from the study due to graft loss due to acute or hyperacute rejection, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, or vascular complication. The remaining patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (44 patients) and B (73 patients) with versus without the use of a double-j-stent, respectively. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of donor and recipient gender, ischemia time, and delayed graft function. We failed to observes significant differences between the 2 groups in mean hospital stay (23 ± 9 and 19 ± 9), urinary leak (2.3% and 4.1%), and urinary tract infection (20.4% and 19.2%), among groups A and B, respectively. The only difference observed concerned the gravity of the urinary leak; no surgical intervention was needed among the double-j stent group versus 2 patients demanding ureterovesical reconstruction in the nonstent group. In conclusion, our data suggested that the routine use of a double-j stent for ureterovesical anastomosis neither significantly increased urinary tract infection rates, nor decreased the incidence of urinary leaks, but may decrease the gravity of the latter as evidenced by the need for surgical intervention.     

Infections After Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPKT) is now an accepted therapy for patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. However, SPKT has an high rate of morbidity and mortality, mainly for infection. From October 1986 to June 2008, in our center 54 patients (18 female; 36 male) affected by diabetes and end-stage renal disease underwent SPKT. The mean duration of diabetes mellitus was 25 ± 4 years. Only 4 patients had not been treated by dialysis before SPKT. Three operative techniques were used: duct injection (n = 5), bladder diversion (n = 14), and enteric diversion (n = 39). The kidneys were always placed into the left retroperitoneal space. The pancreas was placed extraperitoneally in 5 patients. Thirty-four recipients are alive, including 30 with function of both grafts. Six patients died during the first year after transplantation. Infectious complications were the main cause of death in 3 subjects whereas 98 infections were diagnosed in 51 patients. All patients were treated with immunosuppressive agents: steroids associated with calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolic acid, or azathioprine. Antibody induction was used in 41 patients with anti-interleukin-2 monoclonal antibody or antithymocyte globulin. We detected 41 episodes of cytomegalovirus infection: systemic (n = 38), bladder (n = 2), and duodenal (n = 1). The 51 bacterial infections were systemic: (n = 10); urinary tract: (n = 22); pulmonary (n = 11); wound (n = 5); intestinal (n = 3). The 5 fungal infections were gastrointestinal tract (n = 3); and arteritis (n = 2). Some patients experienced more than 1 type of infection. The predominant etiology of the systemic infections was bacterial. In conclusion, infectious complications were the main causes of morbidity after SPKT. An early diagnosis of infection, particularly fungal complications, is essential. We recommend administration of broad-spectrum prophylactic antibiotics, antifungals, and antiviral agents.     

An Examination of Pregnancy Cases After Kidney Transplantation: Single-Center Experience

Introduction

The number of young women who wish to become pregnant opting for kidney transplants is increasing, as becoming pregnant under hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis is associated with many risks. However, there have been reports indicating that these patients are subject to a higher risk of miscarriage compared to women with normal renal function. We examine and report cases of patients that experienced pregnancy after undergoing kidney transplantation at our hospital.

Results of Kidney Transplantation for Diabetic Nephropathy: A Single-Center Experience

In Japan, diabetic nephropathy accounted for 16,225 (43.7%) of the 38,473 patients who began hemodialysis in 2010 and the number increases year by year. In 1991, we started a kidney transplantation program for patients with diabetic nephropathy in our institution, and the ratio of patients who underwent kidney transplantation for diabetic nephropathy traces the course of increase. Among the 516 patients who underwent primary kidney transplantation in our institution from January 1991 to February 2013, we divided them into 2 groups. One group was the diabetes mellitus (DM) group, which included patients with primary disease of diabetic nephropathy, and the other group was the non-DM group. The DM group included 50 patients, and in our institution the ratio traces the course to increase. There was no significant difference for the 1-year and 5-year patient survival rates and graft survival rates between the DM group and the non-DM group. Moreover, the rate of acute rejection in the 2 groups was not significantly different. Furthermore, when we investigated the causes of death in the 2 groups, there was no significant difference with the mortality of cases due to heart vascular disease in the DM group and the non-DM group. Also, no case in which the graft lost function due to recurrence of diabetic nephropathy was observed. Although the early outcome of kidney transplantation for diabetic nephropathy in our institution did not have inferiority in comparison with kidney transplantation for the other primary disease, we think that careful diabetic control after kidney transplantation is required for long-term outcome.     

Kidney Transplantation Across a Positive Crossmatch: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease, with improved mortality and quality of life compared with dialysis. Desensitization protocols have allowed kidney transplantation of highly sensitized patients, who have a lower probability to receive a matching kidney from a deceased or living donor. The aim of this work was to analyze the post-transplantation period of highly HLA-sensitized patients with positive flow cytometry crossmatch against donor cells.

Methods

Following an observational, retrospective design, we investigated 16 highly sensitized patients who underwent kidney or kidney-pancreas transplantation, assessing the impact of desensitization protocols and investigating treatment-related complications, graft function, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) rate, and graft and patient survivals.

Results

We studied 16 patients with positive flow cytometry crossmatch, who were divided into 2 groups based on whether they were submitted to a desensitization protocol or not. Patients who were desensitized underwent transplantation in later years, had higher immunologic risk (panel reactive antibody peak 62% vs 33%; P = .038), higher percentage of 2nd kidney transplant (75% vs 25%; P = .066), and higher percentage of donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies identified (P = .028). A majority of patients were desensitized with high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin and plasmapheresis, and 5 patients received rituximab. Acute AMR rate was of 38%, and rituximab was associated with fewer episodes of AMR. Only 1 patient had graft failure, due to chronic humoral rejection, and the remaining maintained good graft function (mean serum creatinine value of 1.33 mg/dL). No patient died and few complications related to immunossupression were observed.

Conclusions

Desensitization protocols were safe and allowed kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients that probably would never undergo transplantation and gave the opportunity of living-donor transplant to patients with anti-HLA antibodies against the donor.     

Outcome Comparison of ABO-Incompatible Kidney Transplantation With Low-Dose Rituximab and ABO-Compatible Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

Background

The development of immunosuppressive techniques has helped overcome the ABO incompatibility barrier. However, the outcomes of ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation remain a controversial issue with the advent of the anti-CD20 chimeric antibody rituximab. Herein, we report the outcomes of ABOi kidney transplantation with low-dose rituximab.

Patients and Methods

Between June 2006 and April 2013, 42 patients underwent living-related kidney transplantation at our hospital. The patients were divided into 2 groups: ABO-compatible (ABOc; n = 29) and ABOi kidney transplants using low-dose rituximab (100 mg/m²) without splenectomy (n = 13). The basic immunosuppression regimen (calcineurin inhibitor [CNI], mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], and steroids) was the same for both groups, except for the use of rituximab and therapeutic apheresis in the ABOi group. We compared post-transplantation renal function, incidents of virus infection, episodes of rejection, and graft survival between the 2 groups.

Results

In our hospital, 30% of recipients received ABOi kidney transplants. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) did not differ between the groups. Rejection episodes confirmed by biopsy in the ABOc and ABOi groups were 8 (28%) and 4 (31%) patients (P = .833), acute antibody-mediated rejection was observed in 1 (3.5%) and 2 (15%) patients (P = .165), and virus infection was observed in 14 (48%) and 3 (23%) patients (P = .252), respectively. The 5-year patient survival rate was 100% in both groups, and the 5-year graft survival rates were 95% for ABOc and 100% for ABOi transplants (P = .527).

Conclusions

These results suggest that the outcomes of ABOi kidney transplantation with low-dose rituximab are similar to those of ABOc kidney transplantation. Further study is necessary to address the efficacy and safety of ABOi kidney transplantation.     

Outcome of Desensitization Therapy in Immunologically High-Risk Kidney Transplantation: Single-Center Experience

AimSensitization to HLA antigens creates an immunologic barrier, linked to an increased risk of antibody-mediated rejection and poorer graft survival, that remains a persistent and often impenetrable deterrent to transplantation. Desensitization can improve transplantation rates in broadly sensitized kidney transplant recipients. We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of immunologic high-risk kidney recipients who had desensitization treatment with the outcomes of those who did not.Materials And MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent desensitization protocol due to immunologic risk between 2010 and 2018. Living-donor transplantation patients with panel reactive antibody positivity, retransplantation, donor specific antibody, and/or single antigen bead positivity were included in the study. We excluded deceased-donor transplantation recipients. Demographic data (age, sex, etiology of end-stage renal disease, blood transfusions, pregnancy, etc), immunologic status (HLA-mismatch [HLA-MM], panel reactive antibody, donor specific antibody, etc), induction and maintenance of immunosuppressive medications, and complications (all-cause hospitalizations, episodes of acute rejections, etc) were noted. We compared data and clinical outcomes of patients who had desensitization (Group 1) with data and clinical outcomes of patients who had not had desensitization (Group 2).FindingsThere were 124 living-kidney donors (49 female, mean age 43.7 ± 12.2 years, mean body mass index [BMI] 25.8 ± 5.8 kg/m², mean follow-up time 20.9 ± 14.6 months). Thirty-four of these patients (25 female, mean age 43.7 ± 12.5 years, mean follow-up time 26.1 ± 17.7 months, mean BMI 27 ± 6.5 kg/m²) had desensitization treatment (rituximab+plasmapheresis for 19 patients, rituximab for 11 patients, rituximab+plasmapheresis+intravenous immunoglobulin for 4 patients). Ninety patients (24 female, mean age 43.7 ± 12.2 years, mean follow-up time 18.9 ± 12.9 months, mean BMI 25.3 ± 5.4 kg/m²) had not had desensitization. There was no statistical difference between groups for age, sex, hepatitis serology, history of blood transfusion, history of pregnancy, or history of dialysis (P < .05 for all parameters). While scores for HLA-MM and HLA-relative intensity scale (RIS) were 2.7 ± 1.6 and 7.86 ± 6.2, respectively, in Group 1, in Group 2 the same scores were 2.1 ± 1.1 and 3.6 ± 2.5, respectively (P: .053 and .03). Delayed graft function, acute rejection episodes, and hospitalizations were similar between groups (P: .47, .29, and .34, respectively). Follow-up time and length of hospitalization were longer in Group 1 (P: .013 and .001, respectively). Total doses of ATG were higher in Group 1 patients (P: .007).ConclusionDespite the higher HLA-MM and RIS scores, clinical outcomes in desensitized patients were found to be similar to those in nondesensitized patients for acute rejection episodes and hospitalizations. Desensitization with rituximab in patients with high HLA-RIS scores can prevent acute rejection and hospitalization.     

Kidney Transplantation in Old Recipients From Old Donors: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose

The program Old for Old or European Senior Program (ESP), allocates donors aged ≥65 years to recipients of ≥65, within a narrow geographic area in order to minimize cold ischemia time, decrease the waiting time for elderly patients listed for kidney transplantation and expand the transplant resource in this group. The ESP is not officially applied in Greece. In our center, the Old for Old criteria have been used since 2003 for elderly patients who are candidates for kidney transplantation.

Risk Factors and Management of Leukopenia After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundLeukopenia is a common complication after kidney transplantation. The etiology is multifactorial, with medication adverse effects and cytomegalovirus infection as main causes. Optimal strategies to prevent or treat posttransplant leukopenia remain unknown. We aimed to identify risk factors for leukopenia and to investigate the benefit of switching the immunosuppressive therapy to hydrocortisone as a continuous infusion.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated all patients with leukopenia after kidney transplantation between 2007 and 2017 at our center relative to age- and sex-matched controls.ResultsLeukopenia was associated with the degree of rejection therapy before leukopenia, the immunosuppressive therapy before transplantation, and an induction therapy with rabbit antithymocyte globulin. Patients with leukopenia exhibited increased mortality, an increased incidence of bacterial and viral infections, and more acute rejections. Switching to hydrocortisone as a continuous infusion in patients with severe leukopenia decreased the duration of leukopenia and the incidence of subsequent viral infections, especially with cytomegalovirus.ConclusionLeukopenia is a risk factor for infectious complications and mortality, and it is associated with acute rejection. Switching immunosuppressive therapy to hydrocortisone as a continuous infusion is a safe approach to reduce the duration of leukopenia and the incidence of viral infections.     

Long-Term Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation From Expanded-Criteria Deceased Donors: A Single-Center Experience

Background

Organ shortage has prompted the use of expanded-criteria donors (ECDs). Our objective was to compare long-term outcomes of kidney transplants from ECDs with those from concurrent standard-criteria donors (SCDs). In addition, we evaluated variables associated with graft survival in both groups.

Pregnancy After Kidney Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature

After kidney transplantation (KT), pregnancy is possible, although the risk of maternal and fetal complications is much higher than in the general population. Outcome of 22 pregnancies in 17 patients transplanted in the Gdańsk center in the period 1980–2012 was studied. Mean maternal age at pregnancy was 30 ± 5 (range, 23–39) years, interval between transplantation and conception 3.4 ± 2.5 (range, 0.6–11) years. Mean creatinine concentration before conception was 1.29 ± 0.36 (range, 0.8–2.45) mg/dL and was stable during 1 year preceding pregnancy (mean increase, 0.01 mg/dL). Nine of the 17 patients received 1 and 4 received ≥2 antihypertensive drugs, and 1 had proteinuria. Twelve of the 17 patients were primagravidas, 1 was pregnant 3 times, and 14 times. At the time of conception, 20 patients received CNI (14 cyclosporine, 6 tacrolimus), 15 antimetabolites (3 mycophenolate mofetil [MMF], 12 azathioprine), 1 mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi; sirolimus), and all prednisone. MMF and mTORi were discontinued before or during the 1st weeks of pregnancy. Maternal outcome: all survived the pregnancy. None experienced rejection or graft loss as a direct result of pregnancy. Maternal complications included edema (5/17), worsening of blood pressure control (5/17), and worsening (1/17) or new onset of proteinuria (2/17). Mean creatinine decrease during pregnancy was 0.06 mg/dL. Mean creatinine 1 year after pregnancy was 1.49 ± 0.53 mg/dL. There were 12 cesarean sections. Fetal outcomes: 17 live births (2 with serious congenital defects), 2 spontaneous and 1 induced abortion, 2 stillbirths. Mean pregnancy age and neonate birth weights were 35 ± 4 (range, 23–39) weeks and 2,552 ± 629 (range, 1,480–3,420) g, respectively. During mean 8.5 (range, 1–25) years of follow-up after pregnancy, 4/17 patients lost grafts. Grafts were lost in the 3rd to 7th years after pregnancy. We conclude that pregnancy does not exert a direct negative influence on patient and graft survivals; 68% of all pregnancies resulted in delivering healthy neonates.     

Outcome of Kidney Transplantation With Transumbilical Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Donor Nephrectomy: A Single-Center Experience

AimThe aim of this study is to present the outcome of kidney transplantation after laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS DN) compared with conventional laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) in a single-center experience.MethodsThis retrospective study compares data from the initial experience with 110 consecutive LESS DN donors and their recipients (group A) with 205 consecutive conventional LDN donors and their recipients (group B).ResultsThis study compared 110 LESS DNs completed in an 18-month period with 205 LDNs completed in the immediately preceding 42-month period. All procedures were performed by the same surgeon. In groups A and B, respectively, the incidence of immediate graft function was 90% vs 91.2%, slow graft function was 9% vs 5.3%, delayed graft function was 0.9% vs 2.9%, graft loss was 0.9% vs 2.9%, and death with a functioning graft was 0.9% vs 1.5%. The mean serum creatinine levels were 1.3 ± 0.93 mg/dL vs 1.4 ± 1.2 mg/dL (P = .447), 1.1 ± 0.33 mg/dL vs 1.2 ± 0.75 mg/dL (P = .184), and 1.05 ± 0.25 mg/dL vs 1.1 ± 0.39 mg/dL (P = .224) at 7, 30, and 365 days after transplantation. The estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year was 88 ± 18.2 vs 83 ± 12.2 mL/min/1.73 m² (P = .004). The mean donor operative times in groups A and B were 175.9 ± 24.9 minutes vs 199.88 ± 37.06 minutes (P = .0001), respectively, and the mean warm ischemia time was 5.2 ± 1.02 minutes vs 3.64 ± 1.38 minutes, respectively (P = .0001). The mean body mass index, the incidence of complex vascular anatomy, and the rate of complications were the same in the 2 donor groups.ConclusionsThe outcome of kidney transplantation after LESS DN is comparable to conventional LDN. LESS DN can be employed as the primary approach for kidney donation with low donor risk and without compromising recipient outcomes.