Association of Inflammatory Biomarkers with Immunosuppression Management and Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients with COVID-19

BackgroundKidney transplant recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at increased risk for adverse outcomes, such as acute kidney injury (AKI), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death. The association of inflammatory biomarkers with outcomes and the impact of changes in immunosuppression on biomarker levels are unknown.MethodsWe investigated factors associated with a composite of AKI, ICU admission, or death, and whether immunosuppression changes correlated with changes in inflammatory biomarkers and outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) polymerase chain reaction.ResultsOf 59 patients, 50% had estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m². Patients who discontinued calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) had higher peak high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) than those who maintained the same dose (median, 344; interquartile range [IQR], 145-374 vs median, 41; IQR, 22-116 mg/L, P = .03). Of the patients, 73% were hospitalized, 22% had admissions to the ICU, and 20% died. Of the 56% with AKI, 35% required dialysis. All patients with AKI but without pulmonary manifestations recovered to 10% of baseline creatinine levels. Factors associated with the composite outcome were eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² (odds ratio [OR], 5.833; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.880-18.099; P = .002), hs-CRP (OR, 1.011/unit increase; 95% CI, 1.002-1.021; P = .019), white blood cell count (OR, 1.173/unit increase; 95% CI, 1.006-1.368; P = .041), and decreased or discontinued CNI (OR, 4.286; 95% CI, 1.353-13.572; P = .013). eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m² (OR, 11.176; 95% CI, 1.581-79.001; P = .016), and peak hs-CRP (OR, 1.010/unit increase; 95% CI, 1.000-1.020; P = .049) remained associated with the composite in the multivariable model.ConclusionsKidney transplant recipients with COVID-19 have high rates of ICU admissions, AKI, and death. Those with eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m² are at highest risk. CNI reduction is associated with higher inflammatory biomarkers, correlating with worse outcomes. More studies are needed to determine if this association should drive clinical management.     

Is Early COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients Concerning Enough to Halt Transplantation? A Multicenter Comparative Analysis from India

BackgroundLimited data exist on the incidence and outcome of early coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in kidney transplantation recipients (KTR).MethodsA retrospective multicenter research study was conducted across 12 centers in India. We explored the symptomatology, demographic, laboratory findings, and outcome of COVID-19 within 30 days of transplantation. The outcome was compared with the overall KTR and waitlisted patients acquiring COVID-19.ResultsThe incidence of early COVID-19 was 2.6% (n = 22) for the cumulative 838 renal transplants performed since nationwide lockdown in March 2020 until May 2021. Overall, 1049 KTR were diagnosed with COVID-19 and 2% of those had early COVID-19. The median age of the early COVID-19 cohort was 43 (31-46) years. COVID-19 severity ranged from asymptomatic (18.2%), mild (59.1%), moderate (9.1%), and severe (13.6%). Among clinical symptoms, dyspnea and anosmia were frequent, and in laboratory parameters, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and D-dimer were higher in patients requiring oxygen. The mortality in early COVID-19 was not higher than overall KTR (4.5% vs 8.5%; P = 1). COVID-19 severity (23.9% vs 15.7%; P = .0001) and mortality (15.5% vs 8.5%; P = .001) among waitlisted patients (n = 1703) were higher compared with overall KTR.ConclusionsWe report higher burden of COVID-19 in waitlisted patients compared with KTR and a favorable outcome in early COVID-19 in KTR. Our report will help the transplant physicians in dealing with the ongoing dilemma of halting or resuming transplantation in the COVID-19 era.     

Humoral Response After SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Kidney Transplant Recipients: Role of Immunosuppression Therapy

BackgroundMessenger RNA vaccination against COVID-19 has been shown to produce an immune response with sufficient efficacy to prevent natural infection in immunocompetent recipients. However, the response in kidney transplant recipients is low. We aimed to evaluate the specific humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 after vaccination in a population of kidney transplant recipients and assess the main factors associated with a lack of response.MethodsWe undertook a prospective study of 105 kidney transplant recipients and 11 recipients of a combined kidney-pancreas transplant. We analyzed immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin M antibodies after the patients received their second and third doses of the messenger RNA 1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b1 (BionTECH-Pfizer) vaccinations between February and November 2021.ResultsMean (SD) age of the 116 patients was 50 (16) years, and 65% were men. They had their transplants for 40 months (IQR, 15-123 months), with 14% undergoing retransplant and 11% sensitized. The maintenance immunosuppression regimen was steroids + tacrolimus + mycophenolate (MMF) in 68% of the patients and any combination with mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) in 28%. A humoral response developed in 40% of the patients 6 weeks (IQR, 4-10 weeks) after receiving the second dose of the vaccine. Of the 67 patients with no response to the second dose, 51 had an analysis of the humoral response after the third dose, which was positive in 16 (31%). A total of 80% received the Moderna vaccine and 20% the BionTECH-Pfizer. No patient experienced major adverse effects after the vaccination.Factors associated with a lack of humoral response to the vaccine were recipient age (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.001-1.05; P = .04), diabetes (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.9; P = .02), and treatment with MMF (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.08-6.8; P = .03). Treatment with mTORi was associated with a better response to vaccination (OR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.1-0.9; P = .04).ConclusionsThe humoral response to the COVID-19 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients is poor. Factors related with this lack of immunity are recipient age and diabetes, plus MMF therapy, whereas mTORi therapy was associated with a better response to vaccination.     

Evaluation of the Correlation Between Responders and Non-Responders to the Second Coronavirus Disease Vaccination In Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Single-Center Cohort Study

BackgroundThe immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients is significantly lower than that in healthy controls. We evaluated immune responses after the COVID-19 vaccine and their possible relationship with other cofactors in KTx recipients.MethodsThis retrospective single-center cohort study included 29 KTx recipients 2-8 weeks after receiving 2 doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccine. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) immunoglobulin (Ig)-G levels were evaluated to define cofactors influencing the immune response between the responder (anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG level ≥0.8 U/mL) (n = 16) and nonresponder groups (anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG level <0.8 U/mL) (n = 13). The kinetics of antibodies between 2 and 6 months after the second vaccination was also compared between the groups.ResultsKTx recipients with IgG levels ≥0.8 U/mL were younger (54 [interquartile range {IQR}, 46.5-61] years vs 65 [IQR, 55-71.5] years; P = .01), had been transplanted for a longer median time (1588 [IQR, 1382-4751] days vs 1034 [IQR, 548.5-1833] days; P = .02), and were more often treated with a lower mycophenolate mofetil dosage (765.6 ± 119.6 vs 1077 ± 76.9 mg; P = .04) than KTx recipients with IgG levels <0.8 U/mL. There was no significant difference in antibody titers between time periods after the second dose in the responder group. At the 6-month follow-up, a serologic response against the SARS-CoV-2 S was observed in 44.4% of KTx recipients in the nonresponder group.ConclusionsMore than 50% of KTx recipients developed a higher antibody response after the second dose of COVID-19 vaccination.     

Second Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Dialysis Dependent Recipients by Induction Type in the United States

BackgroundWe examined the association between induction type for a second kidney transplant in dialysis-dependent recipients and the long-term outcomes.MethodsUsing the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we identified all second kidney transplant recipients who returned to dialysis before re-transplantation. Exclusion criteria included: missing, unusual, or no-induction regimens, maintenance regimens other than tacrolimus and mycophenolate, and positive crossmatch status. We grouped recipients by induction type into 3 groups: the anti-thymocyte group (N = 9899), the alemtuzumab group (N = 1982), and the interleukin 2 receptor antagonist group (N = 1904). We analyzed recipient and death-censored graft survival (DCGS) using the Kaplan-Meier survival function with follow-up censored at 10 years post-transplant. We used Cox proportional hazard models to examine the association between induction and the outcomes of interest. To account for the center-specific effect, we included the center as a random effect. We adjusted the models for the pertinent recipient and organ variables.ResultsIn the Kaplan-Meier analyses, induction type did not alter recipient survival (log-rank P = .419) or DCGS (log-rank P = .146). Similarly, in the adjusted models, induction type was not a predictor of recipient or graft survival. Live-donor kidneys were associated with better recipient survival (HR 0.73, 95% CI [0.65, 0.83], P < .001) and graft survival (HR 0.72, 95% CI [0.64, 0.82], P < .001). Publicly insured recipients had worse recipient and allograft outcomes.ConclusionIn this large cohort of average immunologic-risk dialysis-dependent second kidney transplant recipients, who were discharged on tacrolimus and mycophenolate maintenance, induction type did not influence the long-term outcomes of recipient or graft survival. Live-donor kidneys improved recipient and graft survival.     

Outcomes of Older Patients in the Recent Era of Heart Kidney Transplantation

Background and ObjectiveVariable age thresholds are often used at transplant centers for simultaneous heart and kidney transplantation (HKT). We hypothesize that selected older recipients enjoy comparable outcome to younger recipients in the current era of HKT.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of HKT outcomes in the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry from 2006 to 2018, classifying patients by age at transplant as ≥ 65 or < 65 years. The primary outcome was patient death. Secondary outcomes included all-cause kidney graft failure and death-censored kidney allograft failure.ResultsOf 973 patients, 774 (80%) were younger than 65 years (mean 52 ± 10 years) and 199 (20%) were 65 years or older (mean 67 ± 2 years). The older HKT cohort had fewer blacks (22% vs 35%, P = .01) and women (12 vs 18%, P = .04). Fewer older patients received dialysis (30% vs 54%, P < .001) and mechanical support (36% vs 45%, P = .03) before HKT. Older recipients received organs from slightly older donors. The median follow-up time was shorter for patients 65 years or older than for the younger group (2.3 vs 3.3 years, P < .001). Patient survival was similar between the groups (mean 8.8 vs 9.8 years, P = .3), with the most common causes of death being cardiovascular (29%) and infectious complications (28%). There was no difference in all-cause kidney graft survival (mean 8.7 vs 9.3 years, P = .8). Most commonly, recipients died with a functional renal allograft (59.8%), and this occurred more commonly in older patients (81.4% vs 54.8%, P = .001). Cox proportional hazard modeling showed that higher donor age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.015, P = .01; HR 1.022, P = .02) and use of pre-transplant dialysis (HR 1.5, P = .004; HR 1.8, P = .006) increased the risk for both all-cause and death-censored kidney allograft failure, respectively.ConclusionsOur study showed that carefully selected older patients have outcomes similar to those of a younger cohort and argues for comprehensive evaluation of the recipients with age as part of comorbidity assessment rather than use of an arbitrary age threshold for candidacy.     

Application of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Patients Undergoing Kidney Transplant: the Belfast Protocol

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to assess the impact of the Belfast Protocol for enhanced recovery after surgery on hospital length of stay (LOS) after kidney transplant.MethodsA prospectively collected database was analyzed for all consecutive renal transplant recipients in 2010 and compared with consecutive renal transplant recipients in 2018 before and immediately after the full implementation of the Belfast Protocol.ResultsThere were 73 renal transplants in 2010 and 115 in 2018. Between 2010 and 2018 there was a significant decrease in LOS from 12 to 7 days (P < .0001). Compared with 2010, in 2018 there was a significant increase in donor age (47 vs 54 years, P < .0001) and kidney transplant from donation after circulatory death donors (0% vs 9%, P < .0001). Although there was no change in the proportion of living donors (59% vs 50%, P = .32), in 2018 there were more blood group incompatible living donors (0% vs 7%, P = .21). Compared with 2010, in 2018 there was a significant increase in recipient age (43 vs 54 years, P = .0002), diabetic nephropathy (5% vs 16%, P = .03), and recipient body mass index >35 kg/m2 (0% vs 9%, P = .02).ConclusionsImplementation of the Belfast Protocol has decreased LOS in renal transplant recipients despite increasingly complex donor and recipient profiles.     

Routine Biomarkers for the Severity of COVID-19 Pneumonia May Present Differently in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BackgroundThe treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is based on the patient's clinical status and levels of inflammatory biomarkers. The comparative activity of these biomarkers in kidney transplant (KT) patients with COVID-19 pneumonia from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and non–SARS-CoV-2 etiologies is unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical presentation and inflammatory parameters at admission of KT patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and those with non–COVID-19 pneumonia over the same period.MethodsBiomarkers were measured and compared between KT patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 57) and non-COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 20) from March 2020 to March 2021.ResultsBoth groups showed comparable demographics. The KT patients with COVID-19 had fewer neutrophils (6824 ± 5000 vs 8969 ± 4206; P = .09) than the non-COVID group, although there was no significant difference in the lymphocyte count. Non–COVID-19 pneumonia was associated with higher d-dimer (median, 921 [interquartile range (IQR), 495-1680] vs median, 2215 [IQR, 879-3934]; P = 0.09) and interleukin-6 (median, 35 [IQR, 20-128] vs median, 222 [IQR, 38-500]; P = 0.006) levels. The ferritin level was higher in the COVID-19 group (median, 809 [IQR, 442-1,330] vs median, 377 [IQR, 276-885]; P = 0.008). In multivariable analysis, only d-dimer (hazard ratio [HR], 1; 95% confidence interval [CI],1-1.002; P = .02) and ferritin (HR, 1; 95% CI, 0.9-0.9; P = .02) increase the statistic signification.ConclusionCOVID-19 pneumonia in KT patients shows a different presentation of inflammatory biomarkers than other non-COVID pneumonias. It could be useful to identify KT patients with COVID-19. More detailed studies are necessary to understand the presentation of biomarkers in KT with COVID-19.     

COVID-19 outcomes in patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation and kidney transplant recipients

The COVID-19 pandemic has brought unprecedented challenges to the transplant community. The reduction in transplantation volume during this time is partly due to concerns over potentially increased susceptibility and worsened outcomes of COVID-19 in immunosuppressed recipients. The consequences of COVID-19 on patients waitlisted for kidney transplantation, however, have not previously been characterized. We studied 56 waitlisted patients and 80 kidney transplant recipients diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 13 and May 20, 2020. Despite similar demographics and burden of comorbidities between waitlisted and transplant patients, waitlisted patients were more likely to require hospitalization (82% vs. 65%, P = .03) and were at a higher risk of mortality (34% vs. 16%, P = .02). Intubation was required in one third of hospitalized patients in each group, and portended a very poor prognosis. The vast majority of patients who died were male (84% waitlist, 100% transplant). Multivariate analysis demonstrated waitlist status, age, and male sex were independently associated with mortality. COVID-19 has had a dramatic impact on waitlisted patients, decreasing their opportunities for transplantation and posing significant mortality risk. Understanding the impact of COVID-19 on waitlist patients in comparison to transplant recipients may aid centers in weighing the risks and benefits of transplantation in the setting of ongoing COVID-19.     

Immunosuppression regimen modification during COVID-19 infection in kidney transplant recipients

BackgroundCOVID-19 pandemic had tremendously affected all the aspects of human life during the past 3 years. In this study, we focused on kidney transplant patients' course from the COVID-19 diagnosis, immunosuppressive medication modification, hospitalization, and COVID-19 complications and how the COVID-19 infection affected the kidney and patients' quality of life during the hospitalization and after the discharge.Material and methodA retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of all kidney transplants adult patients who had a positive COVID-19 PCR from 1 January 2020 to 30 December 2022, and had a history of kidney transplant at the SUNY Upstate Medical Hospital was done to identify the cases.Results188 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study. Based on the immunosuppressive regimen modification during COVID-19 infection, patients divided into two groups; in 143 (76%) patients, the immunosuppressive medication was reduced, and in 45 (24%) of patients, the immunosuppressive regimen continued as before during the COVID-19 infection. The mean time from the transplant to the diagnosis of COVID-19 was 67 months in the group we reduced the IM regimen, and 77 months in the group without changes in IM regimen. The mean recipients' age was 50.7 ± 12.9 years in the group we reduced the IM regimen, and 51.8 ± 16.4 years in the group without changes in IM regimen (P = 0.64). The vaccination rate against COVID-19 with at least 2 doses of either the CDC recommended Moderna or Pfizer vaccines was 80.2% in the group we reduced the IM regimen, and 84.8% in the group without changes in IM regimen (P = 0.55). The hospitalization rate due to COVID-19 related symptoms was 22.4% % in the group we reduced the IM regimen, and 35.5% in the group without changes in IM regimen (P = 0.12). However, the ICU admission rate was higher in the group we reduced the IM regimen, but the difference was not significant (26.5% Vs.6.25%, P = 0.12). 6 episodes of biopsy-proven rejection in the group with IM reduction was observed, which were 3 episodes of acute antibody-mediated rejections (ABMR) and 3 episodes of acute T-Cell-mediated rejections (TCMR), and 3 episodes in the group without any change in IM regimen, which were 2 episodes of ABMR and 1 episode of TCMR (P = 0.51). No significant difference was mentioned in the eGFR and serum creatinine after the comparison between the groups after 12 months of follow up.124 patients responded to the post-COVID-19 questionnaires and were included in the data analysis. The response rate was 66%. Fatigue and exertion were the most reported symptom with a 43.9% prevalence.ConclusionsWe found that immunosuppressive regimen minimization did not impact the kidney function in the long-term and it might be a helpful strategy to minimize the effect of COVID-19 infection on patients' condition during the hospital stay. With all the treatments, vaccinations, and precautions, still some patients did not achieve the complete recovery compared to their pre-COVID-19 health status. Fatigue was the main reported symptom amongst all the reported symptoms.     

Kidney allograft biopsy findings after COVID-19

COVID-19 has been associated with acute kidney injury and published reports of native kidney biopsies have reported diverse pathologies. Case series directed specifically to kidney allograft biopsy findings in the setting of COVID-19 are lacking. We evaluated 18 kidney transplant recipients who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 and underwent allograft biopsy. Patients had a median age of 55 years, six were female, and five were Black. Fifteen patients developed COVID-19 pneumonia, of which five required mechanical ventilation. Notably, five of 11 (45%) biopsies obtained within 1 month of positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR showed acute rejection (four with arteritis, three of which were not associated with reduced immunosuppression). The remaining six biopsies revealed podocytopathy (n = 2, collapsing glomerulopathy and lupus podocytopathy), acute tubular injury (n = 2), infarction (n = 1), and transplant glomerulopathy (n = 1). Biopsies performed >1 month after positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR revealed collapsing glomerulopathy (n = 1), acute tubular injury (n = 1), and nonspecific histologic findings (n = 5). No direct viral infection of the kidney allograft was detected by immunohistochemistry, in situ hybridization, or electron microscopy. On follow-up, two patients died and most patients showed persistent allograft dysfunction. In conclusion, we demonstrate diverse causes of kidney allograft dysfunction after COVID-19, the most common being acute rejection with arteritis.     

Predictor factor for worse outcomes in kidney transplant recipients infected with coronavirus disease 2019: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IntroductionThe pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a massive impact on the health sector, especially in patients with pre-existing comorbidities. This study aims to define the predictor factors for worse outcomes in kidney transplant patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 and affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We have analyzed in these patients their prior medical history, their clinical symptoms, and their laboratory results.MethodWe assessed outcomes of kidney transplant patients with confirmed COVID-19 until July 2021 from PubMed, Medline, Science Direct, Cochrane databases, EMBASE, Scopus, and EBSCO. We performed meta-analyses of nine published studies to estimate predictor factors. The analysis was analyzed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and then using the Review Manager 5.4 software.ResultOur analysis demonstrated that the most significant risk factors for the worse COVID-19 outcomes for kidney transplant patients included: age of 60 and older [MD 9.31(95% CI, 6.31–12.30), p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%], diabetic nephropathy [OR 2.13 (95% CI, 1.49–3.04), p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%], dyspnea [OR 4.53, (95% CI, 2.22–9.22), p < 0.0001, I2 = 76%], acute kidney injury (AKI) [OR 4.53 (95% CI, 1.10–5.21), p = 0.03, I2 = 58%], and some laboratory markers. Many patients had two or multiple risk factors in combination.ConclusionAge and several comorbidities were the most significant factors for COVID-19 outcomes for kidney transplant recipients.     

Association Between Total Cell Free DNA and SARS-CoV-2 In Kidney Transplant Patients: A Preliminary Study

BackgroundKidney transplant (KT) recipients are at high risk for developing severe COVID-19. Lowering immunosuppression levels in KT recipients with COVID-19 encourages native immune responses but can raise the risk of rejection. Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA), reported as a fraction of total cfDNA, is a proven biomarker for KT rejection. Total cfDNA levels are elevated in patients with COVID-19, which may depress dd-cfDNA fractions, potentially leading to missed rejections.MethodsA retrospective analysis of 29 KT recipients hospitalized with COVID-19 between April and November 2020 examined total and dd-cfDNA levels. Blood samples were collected after onset of COVID-19, with follow-up samples collected from a subset of patients, when infection had likely subsided.ResultsAfter COVID-19 diagnosis, the median total cfDNA level was elevated (7.9 multiples of median [MoM]). A significant decrease in total cfDNA levels was observed between the first and second time points (6.2 MoM, 1.0 MoM; P <001). A significant positive association was identified between total cfDNA levels and COVID-19 severity (P = .02; R² = .19). Two patients with biopsy-proven acute cellular rejection had dd-cfDNA fractions below the 1% cutoff for rejection (0.20% and 0.78%), with elevated total cfDNA levels of 7.9 MoM and 41.8 MoM, respectively.ConclusionsIn this preliminary study, total cfDNA levels were elevated in KT patients with COVID-19, subsiding after resolution of infection. High total cfDNA levels may confound dd-cfDNA results, leading to failure to identify rejection. Considering total cfDNA levels is important in interpretation of dd-cfDNA tests for assessment of rejection in KT patients with COVID-19 or other infection.     

Incidence and Impact of COVID-19 Cases in Brazilian Liver Transplant Recipients: An Academic,Single-center Experience

BackgroundCurrent literature reports diverge on the impact of COVID-19 in liver transplant (LT) recipients. Literature findings often report conflicting results, relying on small sample sizes, limited ethnic variability, and nonstandardized methodologies. Notably, there are no studies on this topic regarding Latin American populations. This study seeks to report the impact of COVID-19, disease characteristics, and progression in LT recipients in a Latin American academic center environment.MethodsThe study design was a historic cohort, including adult LT recipient patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 who sought care between December 2019 to October 2021. The primary end point was defined as COVID-19–related death. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data was also collected.ResultsTwenty-seven patients were included, representing a 3.5% incidence within 752 patients in the follow-up. The mean age and years from transplantation were 54 (SD ± 11) and 6.3 years (SD ± 5.4), respectively. Most patients were white (23 - 85.2%) and male (21 - 25.2%). The hospitalization rate was 55.6%, and 5 patients (18.5%), all of whom subsequently died, were admitted to the intensive care unit. Neither the presence of comorbidities nor advanced age were related to lethality. Patients with immunosuppression modifications (P = 0.039) or isolated tacrolimus suspension (P = 0.006) were associated with increased mortality.ConclusionsThis study described COVID-19 infections in LT recipients in Latin American populations. This group was not affected by common factors associated with higher lethality, and displayed a tendency toward lower hospitalization rates. Our study concurred with previously reported evidence of a protective association of tacrolimus maintenance during treatment in LT recipients affected by COVID-19.     

Prediabetes and older age increase the risk of post-transplantation diabetes mellitus: Qatar experience

Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is a major complication in kidney transplant recipients leading to reduced allograft and patient survival. Given the high prevalence of diabetes in Qatar, which is twice the global average, we were interested in determining the incidence of PTDM, identifying risk factors, and comparing clinical outcomes in kidney transplant recipients with and without diabetes. We retrospectively followed up 191 adult kidney allograft recipients transplanted between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2016, for a median of 41 months. A total of 76 patients (40%) had pre-existing diabetes. A total of 39 patients developed PTDM during follow-up; they represent 34% of patients who did not have diabetes prior to transplantation. Two thirds of PTDM occurred within 3-6 months post-transplantation. Prediabetes before transplant [OR = 6.07 (1.24-29.74), P = .026] older recipient's age at the time of transplantation [OR = 1.10 (1.00-1.20), P = .039] and average fasting blood sugar during 3-6 months post-transplant [OR = 1.06 (1.01-1.11), P = .010] were independently associated with PTDM. Patient and kidney allograft survival rates exceeded 97% in all groups. The incidence of PTDM in kidney transplant recipients living in Qatar is high. Older age and prediabetes are independent risk factors for developing PTDM.     

Impact of Covid-19 on kidney transplant and waiting list patients: Lessons from the first wave of the pandemic

BackgroundThe first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic resulted in a drastic reduction in kidney transplantation and a profound change in transplant care in France. It is critical for kidney transplant centers to understand the behaviors, concerns and wishes of transplant recipients and waiting list candidates.MethodsFrench kidney patients were contacted to answer an online electronic survey at the end of the lockdown.ResultsAt the end of the first wave of the pandemic in France (11 May 2020), 2112 kidney transplant recipients and 487 candidates answered the survey. More candidates than recipients left their home during the lockdown, mainly for health care (80.1% vs. 69.4%; P < 0.001). More candidates than recipients reported being exposed to Covid-19 patients (2.7% vs. 1.2%; P = 0.006). Many recipients and even more candidates felt inadequately informed by their transplant center during the pandemic (19.6% vs. 54%; P < 0.001). Among candidates, 71.1% preferred to undergo transplant as soon as possible, 19.5% preferred to wait until Covid-19 had left their community, and 9.4% were not sure what to do.ConclusionsDuring the Covid-19 pandemic in France, the majority of candidates wished to receive a transplant as soon as possible without waiting until Covid-19 had left their community. Communication between kidney transplant centers and patients must be improved to better understand and serve patients’ needs.     

VAV1 Gene Polymorphism is Associated With Kidney Allograft Rejection

BackgroundVAV1 is an intracellular signal transduction protein that plays a significant role in signal transduction in T cells. Several studies suggest that VAV1 signaling plays significant roles in allograft rejection. The aim of this study was to examine the association between VAV1 gene polymorphisms and renal allograft function.MethodsThe study included 270 patients after allograft renal transplantation. We examined the associations between VAV1 gene polymorphisms and complications after transplantation, such as delayed graft function, acute rejection, and chronic allograft dysfunction.ResultsThere were no statistically significant associations between VAV1 genotypes and delayed graft function and chronic allograft dysfunction. Among patients with acute allograft rejection, we observed decreased frequencies of VAV1 rs2546133 TT and CT genotypes (P = .03) and T allele (P = .02), as well as VAV1 rs2617822 GG and AG genotypes (P = .05) and G allele (P = 0.04). In the multivariate regression analysis, the higher number of VAV1 rs2546133 T alleles showed a protective effect against the acute rejection in kidney allograft recipients.ConclusionsThe results of our study suggest that polymorphisms in the VAV1 gene are associated with kidney allograft rejection.     

Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Combined Heart–Kidney Transplantation With or Without Prior Ventricular Assist Device

BackgroundBoth combined heart–kidney transplantation and ventricular assist devices (VADs) pose significant challenges, including sensitization, immunosuppressive treatment, and infrastructure demands. Despite these challenges, we hypothesized that the recipients of combined heart–kidney transplants with and without VADs would have equivalent survival. We aimed to compare the survival of heart–kidney transplant recipients with and without prior VAD placement.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed all patients enrolled in the United Network for Organ Sharing database who underwent heart–kidney transplants. We created a matched cohort of patients undergoing heart–kidney transplantation with or without prior VAD using 1:1 nearest propensity-score matching with preoperative variables.ResultsIn the propensity-matched cohort, 399 patients underwent heart–kidney transplantation with prior VAD, and 399 underwent heart–kidney transplantation without prior VAD. The estimated survival of heart-–kidney recipients with prior VAD was 84.8% at one year, 81.2% at 3 years, and 75.3% at 5 years. The estimated survival of heart–kidney recipients without prior VAD was 86.8.7% at one year, 84.0% at 3 years, and 78.8% at 5 years. There was no statistically significant difference in the survival of heart–kidney transplant recipients with or without prior VAD at one year (P = .42; Figure 2), 3 years (P = .34), or 5 years (P = .30).ConclusionDespite the increased challenge of heart–kidney transplantation in recipients with prior VAD, we demonstrated that these patients have similar survival to those who underwent heart–kidney transplantation without previous VAD placement.