Use of the hilar plate looping technique for bile duct dissection in living donor liver transplantation significantly reduces recipient biliary complications

Biliary complications remain a major cause of morbidity after liver transplantation, especially in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Maintaining adequate blood supply to the bile duct is important for the prevention of biliary complications. The objective of this study was to analyze the effects of different techniques for bile duct anastomosis on posttransplantation biliary complications. From August 2005 to August 2008, 121 liver transplantations were performed at our center. Among the total 121 liver transplant recipients, 68 patients underwent a LDLT using a right lobe graft and were enrolled in this study. We used classic dissection for the first 38 recipients and the hilar plate looping technique for the next 30 patients. The hilar plate looping technique involves the looping of the complete hilar plate and Glissonian sheath around the hepatic duct after full dissection of the right hepatic artery and portal vein. Biliary complications were defined as bilomas or strictures that developed within 6 months after transplantation and required surgical or radiological intervention. There were no significant demographic differences between the 2 groups. The incidence of complications was 15 (39.5%) for classic dissection and 3 (18.8%) for hilar plate looping. Furthermore, there were no biliary strictures in the hilar plate looping group, and there was a significant difference in the complication rate between the 2 groups (P = .011). In conclusion, the hilar plate looping technique during LDLT significantly reduces recipient biliary complications.     

Using the Cystic Duct for Biliary Reconstruction in Dual-Graft Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

In Taiwan, living donor liver transplant (LDLT) has accounted for the majority of liver transplantation due to organ shortage. Dual-graft LDLT is a feasible way to resolve the insufficient graft size and remnant liver in donors. We presented a heavy-weight patient underwent dual-graft LDLT, and cystic duct was used to resolve the inadequate bile duct length and limited appropriate position in dual-graft LDLT. We harvested a right lobe graft (segment 5, 6, 7, and 8 without middle hepatic vein) and a left lobe graft (segment 1, 2, 3, and 4 without middle hepatic vein) stepwise, and placed the grafts orthotopically. For proper tension and length of biliary reconstruction, we anastomosed the right intrahepatic duct of the right lobe graft to cystic duct of the recipient. Before the biliary reconstruction, the metal probe was inserted in the lumen of cystic duct in recipient to ensure the patency and destroy the Heister valve of cystic duct, then the internal biliary stent (5 Fr pediatric feeding tube) was placed in the donor's right intrahepatic duct to recipient's cystic duct and common bile duct, which allows the endoscopic removal of the internal stent. The patient has survived more than 16 months with normal liver function.     

High hilar dissection: new technique to reduce biliary complication in living donor liver transplantation.

Biliary complications after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) continue to be problematic. For reducing the biliary complications, the authors applied an intrahepatic Glissonian approach to the recipient hepatectomy. We called this Glissonian dissection technique at the high hilar level high hilar dissection (HHD). In this study, we introduced this HHD technique and evaluated its outcome in 31 recipients of a living donor liver transplant (LDLT). With total occlusion of hepatoduodenal ligament Glissonia pedicles were divided at the intrahepatic level at the third level of pedicles or beyond. After portal vein and hepatic artery were isolated from the hepatoduodenal ligament, unused bile ducts and bleeding were controlled with continuous suture of the hilar plate. Single duct anastomosis was performed in about 21 and dual duct anastomosis in 10 recipients. Bile leakage of the biliary anastomosis did not occur. There were 6 biliary complications in five patients; 2 bile leaks from the cut liver surface and 4 biliary strictures of which one of unknown etiology. In none of the patients with biliary complications, conversion to a hepaticojejunostomy was necessary. This new HHD technique during recipient hepatectomy may contribute to reduce the biliary complications in duct-to-duct anastomosis by allowing a tension free anastomosis and preserving adequate blood supply to the bile duct. Moreover, it facilitates multiple ductal anastomoses without difficult surgical manipulation.     

Biliary reconstruction following right adult living donor liver transplantation end-to-end or end-to-side duct-to-duct anastomosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Bile duct complications are the modern Achilles' heel of adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. A duct-to-duct anastomosis is currently performed in the presence of single graft ducts, while cholangiojejunostomy is used to drain multiple ducts. Our aim is to describe the feasibility of duct-to-duct anastomoses independent of the presence of one or multiple graft bile ducts. METHODS: The probe technique for right bile duct dissection in donors and a proximal hilar bile duct division in recipients are illustrated. The BARIGA LDLT (biliary anastomosis in right graft for adult living donor liver transplantation recipients) with end-to-side or end-to-end hepatico-hepaticostomy was used in five recipients of right grafts (segments 5-8). RESULTS: All donors and recipients are doing well; all grafts are functional at 13 months. Duct-to-duct anastomoses to single, double, or triple graft ducts have been performed. Two early anastomotic stenoses at 5 and 10 weeks were successfully treated endoscopically. CONCLUSION: The duct-to-duct anastomosis represents a valid alternative to the standard hepaticojejunostomy for right living donor liver grafts. Using this method, biliary complications can be treated endoscopically. End-to-side or end-to-end BARIGA LDLT has the potential to become a standard method in segmental transplantation, including split liver.     

A Single-Center's Early Surgical Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BackgroundLiving donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has become an increasingly common surgical option because the number of cadaveric donors is insufficient to fulfill the organ needs of patients facing end-stage cirrhosis. Many centers are investigating different surgical techniques to achieve lower complication rates. We aimed to examine our complication rates in light of demographic data, graft data, and perioperative findings as a single-center experience.MethodsThe study included one hundred and three patients who underwent LDLT for end-stage liver cirrhosis. Demographic data; sex; age; blood group; Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score; Child score; etiology; liver side; graft-to-recipient weight ratio; hepatic artery, portal vein, and bile anastomosis type rates; anhepatic phase; cold ischemia time; operation time; and blood product transfusion rates were analyzed. Biliary complications in patients with single or multiple biliary anastomoses, right or left liver transplants, and with or without hepatic artery thrombosis were analyzed statistically.ResultsThere was no significant difference in biliary complications between patients who underwent single or multiple bile anastomosis (P = .231) or patients receiving right lobe and left lobe transplants (P = .315). Although there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of portal vein thrombosis between the regular and reconstructed portal vein anastomosis groups (P = .693), the postoperative portal vein thrombosis rate was statistically higher in patients with left lobe transplants (P = .044).ConclusionsVascular and biliary complication rates can be reduced with increasing experience.     

Evaluation of graft stiffness using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging after living donor liver transplantation

Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging is an ultrasound‐based modality to evaluate tissue stiffness using short‐duration acoustic pulses in the region of interest. Virtual touch tissue quantification (VTTQ), which is an implementation of ARFI, allows quantitative assessment of tissue stiffness. Twenty recipients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for chronic liver diseases were enrolled. Graft types included left lobes with the middle hepatic vein and caudate lobes (n = 11), right lobes (n = 7), and right posterior segments (n = 2). They underwent measurement of graft VTTQ during the early post‐LDLT period. The VTTQ value level rose after LDLT, reaching a maximum level on postoperative day 4. There were no significant differences in the VTTQ values between the left and right lobe graft types. Significant correlations were observed between the postoperative maximum value of VTTQ and graft volume‐to‐recipient standard liver volume ratio, portal venous flow to graft volume ratio, and post‐LDLT portal venous pressure. The postoperative maximum serum alanine aminotransferase level and ascites fluid production were also significantly correlated with VTTQ. ARFI may be a useful diagnostic tool for the noninvasive and quantitative evaluation of the severity of graft dysfunction after LDLT.     

Multiple Graft Bile Ducts Do Not Affect the Postoperative Outcomes of Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation

Multiple graft duct openings are associated with a high incidence of biliary complications (BCs), and biliary reconstruction for multiple graft bile ducts (BDs) remains a surgical challenge during living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). In particular, biliary reconstruction using “high biliary radicals (HBR)” of recipients for multiple graft BDs has a high probability of BCs. Herein, we analyzed outcomes by retrospectively reviewing 283 patients who underwent right lobe LDLT from January 2013 to September 2019. In total, 112 LDLT procedures using grafts with multiple BDs have been performed under our policies. In recent cases with 2 orifices located on the same hilar plate, we did dunking with a mucosal eversion technique instead of ductoplasty. When 2 orifices are located far apart on different hilar plates, we attempted to perform separate duct-to-duct anastomosis (DDA) using HBR of the recipient instead of hepaticojejunostomy. Among patients with multiple graft BDs, 20 underwent ductoplasty, 50 were treated using dunking with mucosal eversion technique, and 40 underwent separate DDA using HBR (HBR group). The incidence rates of biliary leakage and stricture were 8.9% and 10.7% in the multiple BD group, respectively, congruent with the outcomes of the single BD group. In subgroup analysis, we compared clinical outcomes between the HBR and single BD groups; the incidence of BCs in the HBR group was 15.0%, comparable to that of the single BD group. In conclusion, multiple graft BDs do not negatively impact the BC rate compared with single-graft BD when applying our technique to prevent BCs.     

Intractable Biliary Strictures After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Series

BackgroundBiliary stricture (BS) is a severe complication after liver transplantation. It is difficult to treat, especially after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). We successfully treated 4 patients for intractable BS after LDLT. All patients had developed cholangitis with stenosis of bile ducts anastomosis.Case 1. A 65-year-old woman underwent LDLT with right lobe graft and duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction. Internal plastic stents inserted by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) were changed quarterly for the next 2 years.Case 2A 55-year-old man underwent LDLT with right lobe graft and duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction. Insertion of internal plastic stents by ERC was attempted; however, the posterior bile duct branch showed complete obstruction. After percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTCD), the stents were inserted using the rendezvous technique of ERC and were changed by ERC quarterly for the next 3 years.Case 3A 22-year-old man underwent LDLT with left lobe graft and hepaticojejunostomy. An external drainage tube was inserted by PTCD, and stents were changed quarterly for the next 2 years.Case 4A 60-year-old man underwent LDLT with right lobe graft and hepaticojejunostomy. An external drainage tube was inserted by PTCD, and changed to a metallic stent after 1 year. Three months later the stent was extracted using the rendezvous technique of double balloon enteroscopy.ConclusionBS of complete obstruction type after LDLT is difficult to treat. Appropriate procedures should be chosen based on the types of strictures and biliary reconstruction methods.     

Duct-to-duct Biliary Reconstruction in Living-donor Liver Transplantation for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis: Report of a Case

Although Roux-en Y hepaticojejunostomy was previously recommended for the biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), some recent reports showed no difference in the graft survival between Roux-en Y and duct-to-duct anastomosis in deceased-donor liver transplantation. On the other hand, considering the risk of recurrence and the short length of the bile duct of the graft, duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis has never been reported in a patient undergoing living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for PSC. A 45 year-old male underwent LDLT using a left-lobe graft donated from his brother. Cholangiography showed no lesion in his common bile duct and duct-to-duct anastomosis was chosen for him. Fifteen months later, he suffered cholangitis due to PSC recurrence and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed. The stents were inserted into his B2 and B3, and he remains well. Because of the ability to easily manage biliary complication, duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction may become the first choice in LDLT for PSC without common bile duct lesions.     

Impact of Monosegment Graft Use for Infants in Pediatric Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BackgroundLeft lateral segment grafts are generally used for very young pediatric patients undergoing living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Recently, graft reduction techniques were developed for LDLT. Monosegment grafting has been used in newborns. The aim of this study was to determine the usefulness of monosegment grafting for infants.MethodsRecipients <2 years of age who underwent LDLT with a monosegment graft between 2010 and 2020 were gathered. Parents comprised all LDLT donors. A segment 2 monosegment graft was resected as a graft from the donor. Standard liver volume (SLV) was estimated using Urata's equation. Graft type, graft weight (GW), and native liver weight were assessed.ResultsEight patients were included in the study. Original diseases consisted of biliary atresia (n = 6) and fulminant hepatitis (n = 2). Final graft type included monosegment (n = 5) and reduced monosegment (n = 3). Median final GW/body weight after reduction was 3% (range, 2%-3.4%). Median native liver weight/SLV was 134% except in patients with fulminant hepatitis. Median pre-reduction graft volume (GV)/estimated GV was 113% (range, 60%-208%). Median pre-reduction GV/SLV of monosegment grafts that required reduction (n = 3) was 109% (range, 106%-121%). Median final reduced graft GV/SLV was 80% (range, 74%-91%). Complications due to large-for-size grafts were not observed. One case of bile leakage due to graft reduction occurred as a complication. Grafts were functioning well with the exception of one graft loss due to antibody-mediated rejection.ConclusionEstimated GV in infants varies widely. Monosegment grafting can be useful for infants as well as newborns.     

成人右半肝活体肝移植胆道重建探讨

目的探讨成人右半肝活体肝移植胆道重建的技术问题.方法回顾性分析我院2007年4月至2009年5月完成的21例成人右半肝活体肝移植资料.供肝右肝管与受者肝总管单个吻合10例;供肝两支胆管开口分别与受者两支胆管吻合5例;供肝胆管整形成一个开口与受者胆管吻合5例,其中采用T管支撑2例,Y型管支撑1例;右肝管空肠Roux-en-Y吻合1例.结果4例受者术后1个月内死亡,1例因术后急性肝坏死行再次肝移植.其余受者存活至今,1年存活率为77.65%.受者术后发生胆道并发症7例,其中胆漏5例,胆道狭窄2例,均经外科手术处理痊愈.胆管与胆管单个吻合口组、胆管整形成一个开口与受者胆管吻合组和两支胆管开口分别与受者胆管吻合组比较,胆道并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(x2=0.659,P=0.719).结论根据供受者胆管情况,可以灵活采用单根胆管吻合、胆管整形、分别吻合和肝管空肠吻合等不同重建方式.后壁连续、前壁间断以及显微外科技术的采用可能有助于降低胆道并发症的发生率.     

"Hepar divisum"--as a rare donor complication after intraoperative mortality of the recipient of an intended living donor liver transplantation.

In this study, we present our experience with 4 healthy donors having the rare condition of "hepar divisum" after the intraoperative death of the recipient of an intended right adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The study included 4 donors and 4 intended right LDLT recipients affected by neuroendocrine tumor (n = 2), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 1), and cryptogenic cirrhosis (n = 1). All 4 recipients died intraoperatively. At the time of recipient death, the dissection of the donor liver parenchyma was complete, the vessels intact, and the hepatic duct(s) already divided. In each case, reconstruction of the donor biliary tract was performed: hepaticojejunostomy (HJ) in 2 cases, each with 3 ducts, and duct-to-duct anastomosis in 2. Of the donors receiving the HJ, 1 had a cut surface bile leak and the other experienced an anastomotic leak, treated by percutaneous drainage and reoperation, respectively. The latter patient experienced recurrent HJ stenosis at 44 months and 50 months after the operation and was treated by percutaneous balloon dilatation. One duct-to-duct reconstruction was complicated by early stenosis (postoperative day 6) and treated with endoscopic stenting. In conclusion, in the case of intraoperative death of the recipient of an intended LDLT, when the parenchyma and the hepatic duct of the donor have already been divided, the options are completion of the donor hepatectomy or the status of "fegatum divisum" with reconstruction of biliary tract. The high incidence of biliary complication, however, is of concern. When more than 1 hepatic duct is present, the donor hepatectomy should be completed and the graft reallocated according to the policy of the transplant institution.     

Single-Center Experience in Managing Right Liver Grafts From Trifurcation or Independent Right Posterior Portal Vein in Adult Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BackgroundThe right liver graft has sometimes been from the trifurcation portal vein (TPV) or independent right posterior portal vein (IRPPV). Managing these PV anatomies to increase the recipient's survival rate remains challenging. Many published techniques could overcome this problem, such as simple unification venoplasty (SUV), autologous portal Y-graft interposition, conjoined unification venoplasty (CUV) with a baseball-like conduit, and SUV plus circumferential fence-like vein extension. This study reviewed our strategy for managing the right liver grafts from TPV or IRPPV in adult living donor liver transplantation (aLDLT).MethodsWe enrolled the study population who underwent aLDLT using the grafts with TPV or IRPPV at our institute from October 2004 to October 2022. We analyzed the reconstruction methods for these grafts and postoperative PV complications in donors and recipients.ResultsDuring the study period, of 528 aLDLT recipients, we identified 26 donors with TPV (n = 10) or IRPPV (n = 16). Eight grafts from TPV had a single PV orifice. The other 18 grafts had dual right PVs that underwent initial PV management, including SUV (n = 13), recipient's right and left portal veins to graft's dual PVs (n = 2), Y-graft interposition (n = 1), CUV (n = 1) and SUV with fence-like vein extension (n = 1). One SUV graft changed to fence venoplasty due to significant tension for PV anastomosis. The acute right posterior PV thrombus and anterior PV stenosis happened in 2 cases with Y-graft interposition and native PVs direct anastomosis. One donor with TPV had portal vein thrombosis and needed thrombectomy with vein patch repair.ConclusionsThe graft from TPV should be carefully planned. A single PV orifice may be feasible but not always possible. An SUV could cover most IRPPVs, but if the distance between the right anterior and posterior PVs is a problem, CUV would be an alternative method. In addition, SUVs with fence venoplasty could relieve PV anastomosis tension.     

Choledochoduodenostomy is a Safe Alternative to Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy for Biliary Reconstruction in Liver Transplantation

Introduction  Bile duct reconstruction during liver transplantation is usually performed by a duct-to-duct anastomosis or a Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy (CDJ). Direct anastomosis of the bile duct to the duodenum (choledochoduodenostomy—CDD) is another option for biliary reconstruction. This technique has been used with good outcome for the treatment of choledochal cysts, ampullary stenosis, and major bile duct injuries; however, there is little published experience with CDD in liver transplantation. We provide preliminary evidence that CDD is a safe technique for biliary anastomosis in liver transplant recipients. Methods  From September 2000 to August 2007 a total of 619 adult first-time cadaveric or living donor liver transplants were performed at the University of Colorado Health and Science Center. Bile duct repair was performed by direct end-to-end anastomosis in 466 patients and by choledocoenterostomy in the remaining 153 patients, 82 of whom were cadaveric recipients. The cadaveric choledocoenterostomy patients were divided into two groups: CDD in 25 and CDJ in 57 recipients. Results  There were no significant differences in the 1-year patient or graft survival between the cadaveric groups. The 1-year patient survival was 100% in the CDD group and 97.1% in the CDJ group. The CDD group did not experience more surgical complications compared to the CDJ group. Conclusions  Choledochoduodenostomy is a safe alternative to CDJ biliary anastomosis when a duct-to-duct anastomosis cannot be performed. There is no significant difference in mortality, graft survival, or biliary complications. In addition, CDD offers the advantage of postoperative access to the billiary system by endoscopy and avoids complications associated with the CDJ bowel anastomosis.     

Results of Using the Cystic Duct for Reconstruction of One of the Multiple Bile Ducts in Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation

BackgroundIn right-lobe liver grafts, variations in the biliary tree anatomy can result in multiple bile duct orifices. We present our experience of 10 patients in which biliary reconstruction was performed with the cystic duct for 1 of the anastomoses with 2 separated ducts. Also, we investigated whether the bile duct anastomosis technique, number of bile duct anastomoses, and use of biliary stents affect the rate of biliary complications.MethodsWe evaluated patients who underwent right-lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) at İstinye University Hospital and İstanbul Aydın University Hospital between December 2017 and June 2020. The patients were divided into 4 groups: duct-to-duct (D-D), duct-to-sheath, double duct-to-duct, and duct-to-duct plus cystic duct-to-duct. Biliary complication rates were compared among these 4 groups, between single- and double-duct groups, and between stent (+) and stent (−) groups.ResultsNinety-three patients who underwent right-lobe LDLT (60 men, 33 women) with a mean age of 51 ± 13 years were included. Mean follow-up time was 18.5 ± 8.3 months. The overall biliary complication rate was 17.2% for all patients, 12.1% for the D-D (single-duct) group (33 patients), 16.1% for the duct-to-sheath group (31 patients), 26.3% for the double duct-to-duct group (19 patients), 20% for the duct-to-duct plus cystic duct-to-duct group (10 patients), 20% for the double-duct group (60 patients), 14.5% for the stent (+) group (69 patients), and 25% for the stent (−) group (24 patients). There were no significant differences among these groups in terms of biliary complication rates. Bile stricture occurred in only 1 cystic duct anastomosis (10%), and no bile leakage was observed.ConclusionsMultiple D-D biliary reconstruction using the cystic duct with external drainage tubes is feasible and safe for LDLT.     

Analysis of caudate lobe biliary anatomy and its implications in living donor liver transplantation – a single centre prospective study

Biliary complications are a significant cause of morbidity after living donor liver transplant (LDLT). Bile leak may occur from bile duct (anastomotic site in recipient and repaired bile duct stump in donor), cystic duct stump, cut surface pedicles or from divided caudate ducts. The first three sites are amenable to post‐operative endoscopic stenting as they are in continuation with biliary ductal system. However, leaks from divided isolated caudate ducts can be stubborn. To minimize caudate duct bile leaks, it is important to understand the anatomy of hilum with attention to the caudate lobe biliary drainage. This single‐centre prospective study of 500 consecutive LDLTs between December 2011 and December 2016 aims to define the biliary anatomy of the caudate lobe in liver donors based on intraoperative cholangiograms (IOCs) with special attention to crossover caudate ducts and to study their implications in LDLT. Caudate ducts were identified in 468 of the 500 IOCs. Incidence of left‐to‐right crossover drainage was 61.37% and right to left was 21.45%. Incidence of bile leak in donors was 0.8% and in recipients was 2.2%. Proper intraoperative identification and closure of divided isolated caudate ducts can prevent bile leak in donors as well as recipients.     

Predictive Factors for the Resectable Type of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Recurrence After Living Donor Liver Transplant

Recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after living donor liver transplant (LDLT) is an essential factor defining prognosis, and surgical resection is the only curative treatment. However, the factors that define whether surgical resection is possible remain unclear. Here, we compared resectable and unresectable HCC recurrence cases after LDLT and examined factors that determine whether surgical resection is possible.Resectable (n = 17) and unresectable (n = 14) groups among 264 patients who underwent LDLT for HCC from January 1999 to March 2020 were compared and examined for recurrence type, prognosis, and clinicopathologic factors. Overall survival after LDLT (median, 8.5 vs 1.7 years, P < .01) was significantly longer in the resectable group. In univariate analysis, female recipient rate, lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) ≥2.75, and tumor size ≤5.0 cm were significantly higher in the resectable group. Younger donors, lower Model for End-Stage Liver Disease scores, lower graft volume, and lower graft volume to standard liver volume ratio were evident in the resectable group. In multivariate analysis, female recipient rate (P = .0034) and LMR ≥2.75 (P = .0203) were independent predictive factors for resectable HCC recurrence after LDLT. Female recipient and LMR ≥2.75 before transplant could predict the surgically resectable type of HCC recurrence after LDLT.     

Outflow reconstruction in recipients of right liver graft from living donors

Right-lobe transplantation is now a commonly used procedure in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) to adult recipients. However, the risk for outflow obstruction is still an issue in LDLT. The right hepatic vein (RHV) was anastomosed end to end to the graft hepatic vein without unfavorable tension on the anastomosis. The anterior wall of the recipient hepatic vein was incised longitudinally, and a V-shaped vein graft was patched to form a wide and long orifice. This new hepatic venoplasty was used in 14 adult patients who received right liver grafts and gave good results without stenosis of the hepatic venous anastomosis or other complications. Our new technique may be useful in recipients of a right liver graft when the recipient or graft RHV is not long enough. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:167-168.)     

Incidence of Ischemia Reperfusion Injury Related Biliary Complications in Liver Transplantation: Effect of Different Types of Donors

Liver transplantation from donors after circulatory death (DCD) is associated with considerable rates of primary nonfunction and ischemic-type biliary lesions. Compared with donation was after brain death (DBD), the biggest disadvantage of DCD is warm ischemia injury in the procurement stage. Donation after brain death followed by circulatory death (DBCD) is a unique practice in China. Such donors should donate according to the DCD procedure, that is, remove life support and donate after cardiac arrest. We retrospectively analyzed donor and recipient characteristics with preoperative and postoperative parameters according to 3 donation types to comprehensively describe incidence of ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) related biliary complications among different donor type adult liver transplantation recipients. A total of 50 patients were included in this study (DBD group n = 17, DCD group n = 26, DBCD group n = 7). Only 1 patient, whose donor type was DBCD was diagnosed with ischemic-type biliary lesions demonstrated cast and retrograde ascending cholangitis. Rates of primary graft non-function (DBD n = 1, 5.9%; DCD n = 2, 7.7%; DBCD, 0%; P = .546) were similar and total biliary complications (DBD n = 1, 5.9%; DCD n = 1, 3.8%; DBCD N = 2, 28.6%; P = .042) were different. No differences were found regarding development of postreperfusion syndrome or coagulopathy in 3 groups. Compared with standard DBD donor, the clinical outcome of DCD donor liver transplantation was satisfactory, with no increase in the incidence of IRI, and, no difference in the incidence of ischemic bile duct complications. This work was carried out in compliance with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul.     

Duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in living donor liver transplantation utilizing right lobe graft

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis for living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) utilizing the right lobe. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Biliary tract complications remain one of the most serious problems after liver transplantation. Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy has been a standard procedure for biliary reconstruction in LDLT with a partial hepatic graft. However, end-to-end choledochocholedochostomy is the technique of choice for biliary reconstruction and yields a more physiologic bilioenteric continuity than can be achieved with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The authors performed right lobe LDLT with end-to-end duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis, and this study assessed retrospectively the relation between the manner of reconstruction and complications. METHODS: Between July 1999 and December 2000, 51 patients (11-67 years of age) underwent 52 right lobe LDLTs with duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction and remained alive more than 1 month after their transplantation. Interrupted biliary anastomosis was performed for 24 transplants and the continuous procedure was used for 28. A biliary tube was inserted downward into the common bile ducts through the recipient's cystic duct in 16 transplants (cystic drainage), or a biliary stent tube was pushed upward into the anastomosis through the cystic duct in four transplants (cystic stent), or upward into the anastomosis through the wall of the common bile duct in 31 transplants (external stent). RESULTS: Biliary anastomotic procedures consisted of 34 single end-to-end anastomoses, 11 double end-to-end anastomoses, and 7 single anastomoses for double hepatic ducts. Overall, 5 patients developed leakage (9.6%) and 12 patients suffered stricture (23.0%). For biliary anastomosis with interrupted suture, the incidence of stricture was significantly higher in the cystic drainage group (53.3%, 8/15) than in the stent group consisting of cystic stent and external stent (0%, 0/8). While the respective incidences of leakage and stricture were 20% and 53.3% for intermittent suture with a cystic drainage tube (n = 15), they were 7.7% and 15.4% for a continuous suture with an external stent (n = 26). There was a significant difference in the incidence of stricture. CONCLUSIONS: Duct-to-duct reconstruction with continuous suture combined with an external stent represents a useful technique for LDLT utilizing the right lobe, but biliary complications remain significant.