AutoPBSC程序与MNC程序采集外周血造血干细胞的比较研究

目的比较COBE Spectra血细胞分离系统的自动采集程序(AutoPBSC程序)与4.7版半自动采集程序(MNC程序)采集健康供者外周血造血干细胞的差异及对供者血常规相关指标的影响。方法 2002年3月~2008年3月期间对53例健康供者随机采用Auto PBSC程序和MNC程序进行了113例次造血干细胞采集,其中采用AutoPBSC程序63例次,MNC程序50例次。分析比较2种程序采得外周血造血干细胞(PBSC)的采集体积、单个核细胞百分数及总数、CD34+细胞百分数及总数等指标,采集前后供者红细胞、血小板变化。结果 2种程序采集外周血造血干细胞的体积、单个核细胞百分数、CD34+细胞百分数、CD34+细胞总数、采集袋中血小板及红细胞混入量、采集前后供者血小板计数的变化存在显著性差异(P<0.01);2种程序采集的单个核细胞总数无显著性差异;血小板计数在应用MNC程序组呈下降趋势,较AutoPBSC程序更加明显(P<0.01);1例地中海贫血供者应用Auto PBSC程序采集失败。结论 2种程序均可有效采集外周血造血干细胞,与MNC程序比较AutoPBSC程序具有以下优势:单个核细胞和CD34+细胞百分数提高、采集物体积减少有利于采集物的冻存、采集物中血小板数少对供者血小板影响小。地中海贫血供者需慎用Auto PBSC程序。     

The predictive value of white cell or CD34+ cell count in the peripheral blood for timing apheresis and maximizing yield

BACKGROUND: The collection of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells (PBPCs) for transplantation can be time-consuming and expensive. Thus, the utility of counting CD34+ cells and white cells (WBCs) in the peripheral blood was evaluated as a predictor of CD34+ cell yield in the apheresis component. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The WBC and CD34+ cell counts in the peripheral blood and the apheresis components from 216 collections were assessed. Sixty-three patients underwent mobilization with chemotherapy plus filgrastim, and 17 patients and 14 allogeneic PBPC donors did so with filgrastim alone. The relationship between the number of WBC and CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood and in the apheresis component was analyzed by using rank correlation and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient for CD34+ cells per liter of peripheral blood with CD34+ cell yield (x 10(6)/kg) was 0.87 (n = 216 collections). This correlation existed for many patient and collection variables. However, patients with acute myeloid leukemia had fewer CD34+ cells in the apheresis component at any level of peripheral blood CD34+ cell count. Components collected from patients with CD34+ cell counts below 10 x 10(6) per L in the peripheral blood contained a median of 0.75 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. When the WBC count in the blood was below 5.0 x 10(9) per L, the median number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood was 5.6 x 10(6) per L (range, 1.0-15.5 x 10(6)/L). A very poor correlation was found between the WBC count in the blood and the CD34+ cell yield (p = 0.12, n = 158 collections). CONCLUSION: The number of CD34+ cells, but not WBCs, in the peripheral blood can be used as a predictor for timing of apheresis and estimating PBPC yield. This is a robust relationship not affected by a variety of patient and collection factors except the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia. Patients who undergo mobilization with chemotherapy and filgrastim also should undergo monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, beginning when the WBC count in the blood exceeds 1.0 to 5.0 x 10(9) per L.     

In vitro collection and posttransfusion engraftment characteristics of MNCs obtained by using a new separator for autologous PBPC transplantation

BACKGROUND: A clinical study was performed to evaluate the peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection, transfusion, and engraftment characteristics associated with use of a blood cell separator (Amicus, Baxter Healthcare). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Oncology patients (n = 31) scheduled for an autologous PBPC transplant following myeloablative therapy were studied. PBPCs were mobilized by a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens and the use of G-CSF. As no prior studies evaluated whether PBPCs collected on the Amicus separator would be viable after transfusion, to ensure patient safety, PBPCs were first collected on another cell separator (CS-3000 Plus, Baxter) and stored as backup. The day after the CS-3000 Plus collections were completed, PBPC collections intended for transfusion were performed using the Amicus instrument. For each transplant, >2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ PBPCs per kg of body weight were transfused. RESULTS: Clinical data collected on the donors immediately before and after PBPC collection with the Amicus device were comparable to donor data similarly obtained for the CS-3000 Plus collections. While the number of CD34+ cells and the RBC volume in the collected products were equivalent for the two devices, the platelet content of the Amicus collections was significantly lower than that of the CS-3000 Plus collections (4.35 x 10(10) platelets/bag vs. 6.61 x 10(10) platelets/bag, p<0.05). Collection efficiencies for CD34+ cells were 64 +/- 23 percent for the Amicus device and 43 +/- 14 percent for the CS-3000 Plus device (p<0.05). The mean time to engraftment for cells collected via the Amicus device was 8.7 +/- 0.7 days for >500 PMNs per microL and 9.7 +/- 1.5 days to attain a platelet count of >20,000 per microL-equivalent to data in the literature. No CS-3000 Plus backup cells were transfused and no serious adverse events attributable to the Amicus device were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: The mean Amicus CD34+ cell collection efficiency was better (p<0.05) than that of the CS-3000 Plus collection. Short-term engraftment was durable. The PBPCs collected with the Amicus separator are safe and effective for use for autologous transplant patients requiring PBPC rescue from high-dose myeloablative chemotherapy.     

Collection of MNCs and progenitor cells by two separators for PBPC transplantation: a randomized crossover trial

BACKGROUND: Efficient collection of progenitor cells is essential for PBPC transplantation. Two apheresis machines (Amicus, Baxter Healthcare; and Spectra, Gambro BCT, software version 4.7) were compared prospectively by a crossover trial. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Apheresis collections were performed for two consecutive days on patients for autologous and donors for allogeneic PBPC transplantation. The patients and donors, receiving a G-CSF, were randomized into two groups. In Group I, PBPCs were collected by the Amicus on the 1st day and the Spectra on the 2nd day, and the reverse order was used with Group II. A total of 60 apheresis procedures of 30 (16 in Group I and 14 in Group II) among 40 patients and donors enrolled were performed and evaluated. RESULTS: The nucleated cell counts, MNC counts, CD34+ PBPC counts, and amounts of CFU-GM collected per procedure were similar with the Amicus and the Spectra. On the other hand, the decrease of peripheral blood platelet counts of patients and donors was more prominent from using Spectra than Amicus (p < 0.0001). Components collected by the Amicus had fewer platelets than those collected by the Spectra (p < 0.0001). The efficiencies of collecting nucleated cells, MNCs, and CD34+ PBPCs were not different between the machines (p > 0.05). However, the efficiency of collecting platelets was significantly higher with Spectra than with Amicus (p < 0.0001). The Amicus took longer than the Spectra to process the same volume (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Amicus is superior to Spectra in avoiding apheresis-induced thrombocytopenia caused by platelets contaminating the collected samples. Therefore, the Amicus is useful for patients with thrombocytopenia or with a less-than-normal platelet count.     

Improved collection of mobilized CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells by a novel automated leukapheresis system

BACKGROUND: For simplification of blood cell transplantation, an automated apheresis system that exploits a dual-stage channel device for mononuclear cell (MNC) collection (Au-toPBSC, designed for the COBE Spectra) was studied. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The automated default software (AutoPBSC-Default) and three software modifications of the harvest frequency during leukapheresis, referred to as Au-toPBSC-1.25, AutoPBSC-1.75, and AutoPBSC-2.75, were evaluated in comparison with the semiautomated Version 4.7 (V4.7) apheresis system in 119 leukapheresis procedures performed in 90 cancer patients treated with chemotherapy plus granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor. CD34+ cell and platelet collection efficiency (CE); volume and cell composition of the leukapheresis components; and patient platelet and red cell (RBC) loss during leukapheresis were measured. RESULTS: The majority of collection measures evaluated with the AutoPBSC compared favorably to those obtained with the V4.7. CD34+ cell CE increased from 55 percent with V4.7 to 68 percent with the AutoPBSC-Default (p = 0.05). The AutoPBSC provided lower platelet contamination in the collected component (1.18 × 10¹¹ vs. 2.26 × 10′′ with the V4.7;p< 0.001). The volume of the AutoPBSC-Default component was significantly lower (67 vs. 180 mL with the V4.7; p<0.001). The MNC purity of the AutoPBSC component was greater (52 vs. 28% with the V4.7; p<0.001), and the RBC contamination lower (AutoPBSC, 0.53 × 10¹¹ vs. 1.04 × 10¹¹ with the V4.7; p<0.001). Modifications of the AutoPBSC to increase the harvest frequency by 1.25-, 1.75-, and 2.75-fold resulted in increased CD34+ cell CE (77%, 75%, and 83%, respectively; p<0.001 in all cases), but also in reduced numbers of circulating platelets, higher platelet contamination of the component, and lower MNC purity than were seen with the AutoPBSC-Default. CONCLUSION: The AutoPBSC offers the following advantages over the V4.7 system: a) better CE of CD34+ cells; b) reduced collection of platelets; c) reduced contamination of the leukapheresis component with granulocytes, platelets, and RBCs; d) reduced component volume; and e) automation.     

Enhanced HPC recruitment in children using LVL and a new automated apheresis system

BACKGROUND: A new automated apheresis system has recently been reported as useful in improving peripheral blood HPC collection in adults. The aim of this study has been to verify the utility of this system (AutoPBSC, COBE BCT) for standard leukapheresis and for LVL in the pediatric setting. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective study was set up in 29 leukapheresis procedures carried out in 26 children with malignant diseases and body weight under 40 kg who had undergone mobilization with G-CSF or with G-CSF and chemotherapy. Leukapheresis procedures were performed under two protocols, depending on the total blood volume processed: standard leukapheresis (< or=3) and LVL (>3). The need to prime the tubing set with blood was determined, and the inlet flow rate, collection time, recruitment of CD34+ cells, CD34+ cell collection efficiency, component volume, leukapheresis cell composition, and preapheresis and postapheresis peripheral blood counts were measured. Paired t test, Spearman's correlation coefficient, and the Mann-Whitney U test were employed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Because of the low extracorporeal volume (167 mL) of the tubing set of the automated blood processor, priming was necessary in only 2 of 26 patients, both weighing under 10 kg. LVL showed better CD34+ cell yield (7.5 vs. 2.3 x 10(6)/kg; p = 0.047), higher recruitment (2.1 vs. 0.9; p = 0.002), and greater collection efficiency (50% vs. 33%; p = 0.005) than standard leukapheresis. No significant differences were found between groups in collection time. In LVL procedures, CD34+ cell collection efficiency and recruitment were not significantly influenced by the inlet flow rate. CONCLUSION: The AutoPBSC is a reliable system for peripheral blood HPC collection in children mainly when used in combination with LVL. The major advantage of this software is a reduced need for priming. LVL allows better CD34+ cell collection efficiency, enhanced recruitment, and improved CD34+ cell yield.     

Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin combination chemotherapy using EPO-based cytokine regimens: a randomized comparison of G-CSF and sequential GM-/G-CSF

BACKGROUND: The peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization capacity of EPO in association with either G-CSF or sequential GM-CSF/G-CSF was compared in a randomized fashion after epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ETP) chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty patients with stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV ovarian carcinoma were enrolled in this randomized comparison of mobilizing capacity and myelopoietic effects of G-CSF + EPO and GM-/G-CSF + EPO following the first ETP chemotherapy treatment. After ETP chemotherapy (Day 1), 20 patients received G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 13 and 20 patients received GM-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 2 to Day 6 followed by G-CSF 5 microg per kg per day from Day 7 to Day 13. EPO (150 IU per kg) was given every other day from Day 2 to Day 13 to all patients in both arms of the study. Apheresis (two blood volumes) was performed during hematologic recovery. RESULTS: The magnitude of CD34+ cell mobilization and the abrogation of patients' myelosuppression were comparable in both study arms; however, GM-/G-CSF + EPO patients had significantly higher CD34+ yields because of a higher CD34+ cell collection efficiency (57.5% for GM-/G-CSF + EPO and 46.3% for G-CSF + EPO patients; p = 0.0009). Identical doses of PBPCs mobilized by GM-/G-CSF + EPO and G-CSF + EPO drove comparable hematopoietic recovery after reinfusion in patients treated with identical high-dose chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The sequential administration of GM-CSF and G-CSF in combination with EPO is feasible and improves the PBPC collection efficiency after platinum-based intensive polychemotherapy, associating high PBPC mobilization to high collection efficiency during apheresis.     

血细胞分离机AutoPBSC程序与MNC程序采集外周血干细胞的效果比较及影响因素分析

本研究旨在分析COBE Spectra血细胞分离机自动采集程序（Auto PBSC程序）与半自动采集程序（MNC程序）在外周血干细胞采集中的效果及影响因素。109例采集按对象不同分为自体患者组（患者）和异基因供者组（供者）,通过对采集物中干细胞数量与质量及采集程序特点的比较,对两种采集程序在两组中的采集结果及影响因素分别进行了分析。结果表明,在全血处理量基本相同的情况下,患者组和供者组两种程序采集物中MNC%与CD34^＋%、CD34^＋细胞数及血红蛋白含量差异无显著性（P〉0.05）;与MNC程序比较,Auto PBSC程序采集物中血小板混入少,采集物体积小,但抗凝剂用量多,采集时间长（P〈0.05）。相关性分析显示,患者组两种程序采集物中MNC数（r=0.314,P=0.015）、CD34^＋细胞数（r=0.922,P=0.000）与采集前对应参数呈正相关,采集物中CD34^＋细胞数与WBC数（r=0.369,P=0.004）及MNC数（r=0.495,P=0.000）呈正相关;供者组Auto PBSC程序采集物中MNC数与采集前呈正相关（r=0.896,P=0.000）,MNC程序采集物中CD34^＋细胞数与采集前呈正相关（r=0.666,P=0.000）。患者组Auto PBSC程序采集物中MNC数与CD34^＋细胞数在男性显著高于女性（P〈0.05）,在年龄40岁以下的患者显著高于年龄在40岁以上的患者（P〈0.05）,而MNC程序年龄在40岁以上患者采集的CD34^＋细胞数显著高于年龄40岁以下患者（P〈0.05）。供者组仅MNC程序采集物中MNC数与CD34^＋细胞数在男性显著高于女性（P〈0.05）。结论：在全血处理量相同时,自体患者和异基因供者PBSC采集中两种程序收获的MNC纯度与CD34^＋细胞纯度及浓度高度一致,但自体患者PBSC采集结果受年龄与性别影响较大。     

Inverse relationship between patient peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and collection efficiency for CD34+ cells in two automated leukapheresis systems

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the CD34 cell collection efficiency (CE) of automated leukapheresis protocols of two blood cell separators (Spectra, COBE [AutoPBSC protocol] and AS104, Fresenius [PBSC-Lym, protocol]) for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvest in patients with malignant diseases. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPCs were collected by the Spectra AutoPBSC protocol in 95 patients (123 collections) and the AS104 PBSC-Lym protocol in 87 patients (115 harvests). Patients underwent a median of one (range, 1-4) conventional-volume apheresis procedure of 10.8 L (9.0-13.9) to obtain a target cell dose of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. RESULTS: The median overall CD34 CE was significantly better on the AS104 than on the Spectra: 55.8 percent versus 42.4 percent (p = 0.000). This was also true below (59.2% vs. 50.1%; p = 0.022) and above (51.2% vs. 41.3%; p = 0.001) the preleukapheresis threshold of 40 CD34+ cells per microL needed to collect a single-apheresis autograft. However, at > or =40 circulating CD34+ cells per microL, both cell separators achieved the target of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. The CD34 CE dropped significantly, from 59.2 percent at <40 cells per microL to 51.2 percent at > or =40 cells per microL on the AS104 (p = 0.017) and from 50.1 percent to 41.3 percent on the Spectra (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Whereas the CD34 CE was significantly different with the AS104 and the Spectra, the CD34 CE of both machines correlated inversely with peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, showing a significant decline with increasing numbers of circulating CD34+ cells. Nevertheless, at > or 40 preapheresis CD34+ cells per microL, sufficient hematopoietic autografts of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg were harvested by a single conventional-volume (11 L) leukapheresis on both cell separators.     

Allogeneic blood progenitor cell collection in normal donors after mobilization with filgrastim: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

BACKGROUND: Information on the safety and efficacy of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection in filgrastim-mobilized normal donors is still limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The PBPC donor database from a 42-month period (12/94-5/98) was reviewed for apheresis and clinical data related to PBPC donation. Normal PBPC donors received filgrastim (6 microg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours) for 3 to 4 days and subsequently underwent daily leukapheresis. The target collection was > or =4 x 10(6)CD34+ cells per kg of recipient's body weight. RESULTS: A total of 350 donors were found to be evaluable. Their median age was 41 years (range, 4-79). Their median preapheresis white cell count was 42.8 x 10(9) per L (range, 18.3-91.6). Of these donors, 17 (5%) had inadequate peripheral venous access. Leukapheresis could not be completed because of apheresis-related adverse events in 2 donors (0.5%). Of the 324 donors evaluable for apheresis yield data, 221 (68%) reached the collection target with one leukapheresis. The median CD34+ cell dose collected (first leukapheresis) was 462 x 10(6) (range, 29-1463).The main adverse events related to filgrastim administration in donors evaluable for toxicity (n = 341) were bone pain (84%), headache (54%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (13%). These events were rated as moderate to severe (grade 2-3) by 171 (50%) of the donors. In 2 donors (0.5%), they prompted the discontinuation of filgrastim administration. CONCLUSION: PBPC apheresis for allogeneic transplantation is safe and well tolerated. It allows the collection of an "acceptable" PBPC dose in most normal donors with one leukapheresis, with minimal need for invasive procedures.     

Automated programs for collection of mononuclear cells and progenitor cells by two separators for peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation: comparison by a randomized crossover study

BACKGROUND: Although automated programs have been increasingly used to collect peripheral blood (PB) progenitor cells (PBPCs), differences among them remain unclear. The automated programs of Amicus (Baxter Healthcare) and Spectra (software Version 6.1, Gambro BCT) apheresis machines were compared in a crossover study. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The patients for autologous and donors for allogeneic PBPC transplantation mobilized with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor were randomly assigned into two groups. PBPCs were collected by the Amicus on the first day and the Spectra on the second of 2 consecutive days in Group I, and the reverse order was used in Group II. Of 39 patients or donors enrolled, 17 reached their collection goal with only one procedure and did not participate in the paired study. Thus, 44 paired procedures of the remaining 22 subjects were evaluated. RESULTS: The product yields of white blood cells (WBCs; p < 0.005), mononuclear cells (MNCs; p < 0.02), and CD34+ PBPCs (p < 0.0002) from patients or donors were higher in the Amicus collections than those in the Spectra collections. The collection efficiencies of WBCs (p < 0.03), MNCs (p < 0.02), and CD34+ PBPCs (p < 0.03) were higher in the Amicus collections. The numbers of contaminating platelets (PLTs) in the Amicus collections were lower than those in the Spectra collections (p < 0.05) with a greater decrease in PB PLT counts after apheresis with the Spectra (p < 0.01). The Amicus had a longer running time than the Spectra for processing similar volumes (p < 0.005). CONCLUSION: The automated program of the Amicus may be better than that of the Spectra for collecting MNCs and CD34+ PBPCs and avoiding apheresis-induced thrombocytopenia.     

High platelet contamination in progenitor cell concentrates results in significantly lower CD34+ yield after immunoselection

BACKGROUND: Selection of CD34+ cells by specific immunoselection leads to a significant loss of those cells. The factors influencing the yield and purity are not well identified. The results of CD34+ selection from peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) with high and low platelet contamination that are harvested with two different cell separators are reported. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A progenitor cell concentrator (Ceprate SC, CellPro) was used to select CD34+ cells from 41 PBPC concentrates from 23 consecutive patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 3), breast cancer (n = 17), and multiple myeloma (n = 3). PBPC collection was performed by using two cell separators (CS3000 Plus, Fenwal: Group A, n = 11; and Spectra, COBE: Group B, n = 9). To reduce platelet contamination in the Spectra PBPC concentrates, an additional low-speed centrifugation was performed before CD34+ cell selection (Group C, n = 3). Leukapheresis components were stored overnight at 4 degrees C and combined with the next day's collection before the CD34+ selection procedure in 19 patients. RESULTS: A median of 1.5 leukapheresis procedures per patient were performed. Pooled PBPC concentrates showed no statistical difference in median numbers of white cells and CD34+ cells in Groups A and B: 3.2 (0.8-9.2) versus 4.4 (1.6-8. 3) x 10(10) white cells per kg and 15.0 (4.7-24.0) versus 12.0 (5. 6-34.0) x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. Platelet contamination was significantly higher in Group B: 0.67 (0.15-2.4) versus 2.3 (0.5-7. 1) x 10(11) (p = 0.0273). After the selection process, there was a significantly greater loss of CD34+ cells in Group B than in Group A: 39.1 versus 63.2 percent (p = 0.0070), with a median purity of 78. 0 percent versus 81.0 percent. An additional low-speed centrifugation before CD34+ cell selection seemed to reduce CD34+ cell loss in Group C with 16.9, 31.9, and 37.5 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: CD34+ cell selection from PBPC concentrates resulted in an increased loss of CD34+ cells in concentrates with a higher platelet content. To improve CD34+ yield, PBPC concentrates with an initially low platelet contamination should be used, or additional low-speed centrifugation should be performed.     

Comparison of intermittent- and continuous-flow cell separators for the collection of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with hematologic malignancies

BACKGROUND: The transplantation of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) after high-dose chemotherapy is a valuable therapy for patients with hematologic and solid malignancies. Several methods are used for harvesting PBPCs. The efficiency of intermittent- and continuous-flow blood cell separators in collecting progenitor cells from the blood of patients undergoing myeloablative treatment for cancer was compared. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPC components (n = 133) were obtained from 72 patients by leukapheresis with continuous-flow machines (Spectra, COBE; CS 3000 Plus, Baxter) and with an intermittent-flow machine (MCS 3P, Haemonetics). The data were analyzed retrospectively. Blood samples obtained from the patients before leukapheresis and samples of the leukapheresis components themselves were analyzed for their content of RBCs, WBCs, platelets, and CD34+ cells. RESULTS: The Spectra processed more than twice the blood volume in the shortest time (15 L in 178 min), whereas the Baxter CS 3000 Plus (10 L in 185 min) and the MCS 3P (4.8 L in 239 min) processed significantly smaller volumes in a longer time. The mean ACD consumption was 403 mL with the MCS 3P, 900 mL with the CS 3000 Plus, and 1000 mL with the Spectra. The product volumes were 50 mL (CS 3000 Plus), 69 mL (MCS 3P), and 166 mL (Spectra). In all groups, differences in the preapheresis hemograms were not significant, but the Spectra group had fewer CD34+ cells than the other groups. Despite this, the differences in the number of CD34+ cells in the leukapheresis components of all groups were without statistical significance. In the Spectra group, the collection of MNCs of 104 percent and CD34+ cells of 154 percent was significantly more efficient than that in the MCS 3P group (42.2% and 56%, respectively) or the CS 3000 Plus group (50.8% and 47.15%) as related to the patients' blood volume. CONCLUSION: PBPC collection can be performed successfully with continuous-flow and intermittent-flow blood cell separators. The Spectra had the best recovery of CD34+ cells within the shortest time. Leukapheresis with the MCS 3P is indicated if only a single venous access is available.     

CD34+ cell mobilization for allogeneic progenitor cell transplantation: efficacy of a short course of G-CSF

BACKGROUND: G-CSF-mobilized PBPCs are considered the richest source of HPCs for both autologous and allogeneic transplantation, but, despite their wide use, the best dose and schedule for G-CSF administration have not been definitively established. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: With a target of collecting from the peripheral blood > or = 4 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg of body weight of the recipient, the short-course administration of glycosylated G-CSF (gly-G-CSF) in 30 healthy donors for an allogeneic transplantation was investigated. Gly-G-CSF was given subcutaneously at a dose of 10 microg per kg per day in two divided doses over 3 days and was followed by a leukapheresis (on the 4th day) 12 hours after the last dose. RESULTS: A median of 53.5 circulating CD34+ cells per microL (range, 19-190) was found in the 30 donors on the day of first leukapheresis, which allowed a median CD34+ cell collection of 6.0 x 10(6) per kg of body weight of the donor and 6.5 x 10(6) per kg of body weight of the recipient. In 25 (83%) of 30 donors, a single procedure was sufficient to collect the target CD34+ cells, while in the other 5, two leukapheresis procedures were required. Hematologic reconstitution was observed in all patients at a median of 14 days (range, 10-23) for neutrophils and 14.5 days (range, 11-46) for platelets. With a median infusion of 3.9 x 10(8) CD3+ T-lymphocytes per kg of body weight of the recipient (range, 1.3-7.8), acute and chronic GVHD occurred in 13 (43%) of 30 and 15 (60%) of 25 evaluable patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 337 days from transplant, 22 (73%) of 30 patients are alive in complete remission. CONCLUSION: A schedule consisting of 3-day administration of gly-G-CSF followed by a single leukapheresis can be proposed and widely accepted by healthy donors, as 84 percent of them reach the target in the estimated time with a reduced drug exposure. The cost of the procedure is reduced, in terms of both the growth factor administration and the number of leukapheresis procedures. The search for the optimum methods of donor management may improve the acceptability of this procedure and increase the number of allogeneic transplantations from PBPCs.     

Peripheral blood stem cell collection in multiple myeloma: A retrospective analysis of 6 years leukapheresis activity in 109 patients treated at the Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori of Milan

Double autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard treatment in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients younger than 65 years; therefore, optimization of leukapheresis is crucial. We performed a retrospective analysis of 297 leukaphereses comparing semiautomated (V4.7 in 20% of collections) versus automated (V6.0 in 80%) Caridian (COBE) Spectra versions and analyzing the influence of M‐protein on the outcome. Both methods gave comparable collection efficiencies (CE%) (53.4% vs. 55.7% in V6.0 and V4.7, respectively) with similar leukapheresis time and processed volume. Harvest volume was higher in V4.7 (P < 0.0001) with similar contamination of red blood cells (RBCs) (P = 0.77) and platelets (P = 0.09) when compared with V6.0. In patients with higher peripheral white blood cells (WBCs), V6.0 with adjusted harvest volume (<700 mL), achieved similar CD34⁺ CE% (P = 0.39) and better enrichment of nucleated cells (P < 0.0,002) but higher RBCs (P < 0.0,001) and platelets contamination (P = 0.001), when compared with a larger cycle volume in patients with lower WBCs. In hard to mobilize patients, CD34⁺ CE% was significantly more efficient with V4.7 than V6.0 (P < 0.0,001). CD34⁺ CE% was unaffected by serologic M‐protein, but platelet CE% was higher in the absence of M‐protein (P = 0.0,003), without any reduction in peripheral patients platelets. We, therefore, conclude that in the setting of MM patients with a high WBCs count and/or low percentage of peripheral CD34⁺ cells, collections with V4.7 or adjusted cycle volume V6.0 gave comparable result in CD34⁺ CE%. RBCs and platelets contamination is higher if low cycle volume is chosen. In hard to mobilize patients, V4.7 is advisable. J. Clin. Apheresis, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Isolation of CD34+ progenitor cells from peripheral blood by use of an automated immunomagnetic selection system: factors affecting the results

BACKGROUND: The isolation of CD34+ cells from mobilized peripheral blood is being increasingly used in the setting of allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation. Investigation of variables that may influence the effectiveness of CD34+ cell selection is of interest. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-one CD34+ cell selections from peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) (39 allogeneic and 12 autologous) were performed using a magnetic cell separator (Isolex 300i, Baxter), including version 2.0 software. The results obtained were analyzed for different processing variables. The feasibility of transplanting these isolated CD34+ cells was also analyzed. RESULTS: The isolated CD34+ cell fraction had a median purity of 88.9 percent (range, 47.8-98.3). The median recovery of CD34+ cells was 45.1 percent (13.8-76.2), and the median colony-forming unit- granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) content was 17. 2 percent (0.8-58.6). Logarithms of T- and B-cell depletion had median values of 3.7 and 2.8, respectively. The version 2.0 software of the Isolex 300i gave a higher CD34+ cell recovery in the enriched cell fraction (median 57.8%) than did version 1.11 (39.4%) or 1.12 (44.4%) (p = 0.01). The use of recombinant human deoxyribonuclease I during cell processing yielded more CD34+ cells (53% vs. 41%, p = 0. 01) and higher purity (92.8% vs. 87%, p = 0.03). There was a correlation between the percentage of CD34+ cells labeled with the monoclonal antibody 8G12 clone and the percentage of CD34+ cells labeled with the monoclonal antibody used during the processing technique (9C5 clone) in the initial, enriched, and depleted CD34+ cell fractions (R(2) = 0.95; 0.92; 0.78, p< 0.005, respectively). Median times for recovering >0.5 x 10(9) per L of granulocytes and >20 x 10(9) per L of platelets were 13 and 16 days in the allograft patients and 13 and 14 days in the autograft patients. CONCLUSION: CD34+ cells can be highly and effectively isolated from allogeneic and autologous grafts by use of this automated technique, with a high grade of T- and B-cell depletion. These purified CD34+ cell components can engraft normally.     

Effective collection of peripheral blood stem cells in children weighing 20 kilogram or less in a single large‐volume apheresis procedure

Introduction : Peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation has become a routine procedure in pediatric oncology. A special group of PBSC donors are children weighing 20 kg or less. Limited vascular access and low blood volume puts them at a higher risk. Central line placement and a priming apheresis machine are recommended to avoid these complications. Patients and Methods : PBSC collections performed from July 2006 to May 2013 in children weighing less than 20 kg were included. All donors had a central venous catheter (CVC). An apheresis machine was primed with packet red blood cells. Results : Twenty‐seven PBSC collections were performed in 22 children weighing 20 kg or less, 14 for allogeneic and 8 for autologous transplantation, in order to collect at least 2 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells/kg. In the allogeneic group, median age and weight were 3 years (0.8–7) and 15.5 kg (8–20). In the autologous group, median age and weight were 3 years (2–7) and 15.35 kg (12.5–19.5). A single large‐volume apheresis was sufficient to obtain the CD34+ cells needed in 78.5% and 75% of the allogeneic and autologous groups, respectively, with a median 11.84 × 10⁶ and 5.79 × 10⁶ CD34+ cells collected per kilogram of weight of the recipient. No serious complications related to the apheresis procedure or CVC placement occurred. Conclusion : PBSC collection in a single large‐volume apheresis for allogeneic and autologous transplants in children weighing 20 kg or less is a safe and effective procedure when based on standardized protocols. J. Clin. Apheresis 30:281–287, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A cell-kinetic model of CD34+ cell mobilization and harvest: development of a predictive algorithm for CD34+ cell yield in PBPC collections

BACKGROUND: Mobilization and homing of PBPCs are still poorly understood. Thus, a sufficient algorithm for the prediction of PBPC yield in apheresis procedures does not yet exist. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The decline of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood during apheresis and their simultaneous increase in the collection bag were determined in a prospective study of 18 consecutive apheresis procedures. A cell-kinetic, four-compartment model describing these changes was developed. Retrospective data from 136 apheresis procedures served to further improve this model. A predictive algorithm for the yield was developed that considered the sex, weight, and height of the patient, the number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood before apheresis, the inlet flow, and the duration of the apheresis. The accuracy of this algorithm was evaluated by comparison of the predicted and the observed yields of CD34+ cells in 105 prospective autologous and 148 retrospective allogeneic apheresis procedures. RESULTS: The correlation between predicted and observed yields was good for the autologous and allogeneic groups with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.8979 and 0.8311 (p<0.0001), respectively. The regression is described by the equations log (measured value [m]) = 1.0118 + 0.8595 x log (predicted value [p]) for the autologous and log (m) = 2.226 + 0.7559 x log (p) for the allogeneic group. The respective equations for the zero-point regression are log (m) = 1.014 x log (p) and log (m) = 1.026 x log (p). The probability that the measured value was 90 percent or more of the predicted value was 83.8 percent for the autologous and 90.5 percent for the allogeneic apheresis procedures. CONCLUSION: The predictive accuracy of the algorithm and the slope of the zero-point regression curve were higher for allogeneic than autologous PBPC collections. The predictive algorithm may be a useful tool in PBPC harvest, enabling the adaptation of the size of the apheresis to the needs of each patient.     

Optimal timing of apheresis for the efficient mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells recruited by high-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in healthy donors

Predictors of peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) yield can potentially improve the comfort, safety, and efficacy of CD34+ cell collection from donors treated with recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). We investigated 181 apheresis procedures on 109 healthy allogeneic donors to identify factors correlating with efficient PBSC collection. Apheresis started on Day 4 or 5 and continued up to Day 6 of G-CSF administration. CD34+ cell yields on Days 4 and 5 were comparable, and significantly higher than on Day 6. This suggests that starting apheresis on Day 4 rather than Day 5 may be preferable, to reduce G-CSF exposure and optimize yield, even if multi-day collection is required. More CD34+ cells were collected from male and cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative donors than from female and CMV-seropositive donors, respectively. The yields of CD34+ cells were similarly high in both male and female donors aged 20–29 years; yields decreased in female donors in their thirties, and were comparably low in both male and female donors in their forties and thereafter. These findings should guide decision-making about when to begin apheresis, and encourage careful consideration of donor factors such as gender, age, and CMV serostatus when collecting PBSCs.     

Ex vivo evaluation of PBMNCs collected with a new cell separator

BACKGROUND: This study reports on an evaluation of the ability of a cell separator (Amicus, Baxter Healthcare) and the integral MNC computer software program to collect a variety of MNC subsets. The collection efficiency (CE) of the Amicus for these MNC subsets was compared to that of another cell separator (CS-3000 Plus, Baxter). The collected MNCs were also assayed ex vivo to determine if these cells remained functional. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Healthy volunteer blood donors were recruited to provide PBMNCs for the isolation of CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, CD19+, NK, and gammadelta+ cells and monocytes. Cells were collected with an Amicus (test arm; n = 16) or a CS-3000 Plus (control arm; n = 11) cell separator. Cells were counted on a flow cytometer and CEs were calculated. For functional studies, the Amicus-collected MNC data were compared to CS-3000 Plus historical data. Functional studies performed included surface antigen expression assays (CD8+), proliferation assays (CD4+ and CD8+ cells), NK cytotoxicity assays for K562 and HUVE cells, and E-selectin induction on endothelial cells through NK+ contact dependency. Dendritic cells (DCs) were generated from CD34+ cells collected on the Amicus, positively selected by the use of antibody-bound, magnetic bead technology, and then cultured ex vivo with a combination of growth factors to generate the DCs. RESULTS: CEs were higher on the Amicus than on the CS-3000 Plus for CD3+ (68 vs. 54%), CD4+ (70 vs. 56%), CD8+ (68 vs. 52%), and CD19+ (60 vs. 48%) cells (p<0.05). For the two separators, CEs were equivalent for monocytes, NK+, and gammadelta+ cells. The Amicus separator collected significantly fewer platelets than did the CS-3000 Plus (p<0.00001). CD4+, CD8+, and NK cells proliferated normally. NK cells appropriately stimulated E-selectin expression on endothelial cells. Culture-generated DCs obtained by using Amicus-collected CD34+ cells expressed appropriate cell surface markers. CONCLUSION: The Amicus separator is acceptable for the collection of PBMNC subsets. The device collects CD3+, CD4+, CD8+, and CD19+ T- and B-cell subsets with greater efficiency and collects MNCs with significantly fewer contaminating platelets than does the CS-3000 Plus. Cells collected on the Amicus are suitable for use in a variety of research and clinical immunobiologic studies.