Posterior capsular contracture of the shoulder

Posterior capsular contracture is a common cause of shoulder pain in which the patient presents with restricted internal rotation and reproduction of pain. Increased anterosuperior translation of the humeral head occurs with forward flexion and can mimic the pain reported with impingement syndrome; however, the patient with impingement syndrome presents with normal range of motion. Initial management of posterior capsular contracture should be nonsurgical, emphasizing range-of-motion stretching with the goal of restoring normal motion. For patients who fail nonsurgical management, arthroscopic posterior capsule release can result in improved motion and pain relief. In the throwing athlete, repetitive forces on the posteroinferior capsule may cause posteroinferior capsular hypertrophy and limited internal rotation. This may be the initial pathologic event in the so-called dead arm syndrome, leading to a superior labrum anteroposterior lesion and, possibly, rotator cuff tear. Management involves regaining internal rotation such that the loss of internal rotation is not greater than the increase in external rotation. In the athlete who fails nonsurgical management, a selective posteroinferior capsulotomy can improve motion, reduce pain, and prevent further shoulder injury.     

Die arthroskopische periglenoidale Kapsulotomie zur Behandlung der therapierefraktären adhäsiven Kapsulitis

Idiopathic adhesive capsulitis can severely restrict the comfort and function of the entire extremity, often resulting in prolonged, substantial disability. Some studies have demonstrated long-term residual pain and limitation of motion in most patients after conservative treatment such as physical therapy or corticoid injection. Closed manipulation is associated with severe complications. We report the technique and results of arthroscopic capsular release as an effective and safe alternative for the management of refractory adhesive capsulitis. We operated 23 patients between June 2003 and November 2004 who suffered from a loss of glenohumeral motion in all planes arthroscopically. Ten of the patients were evaluated after a mean follow-up of 6 months. We found significant pain relief a few days after surgery in every patient. Furthermore, we found improvements in the range of motion in all planes. Abduction improved from preoperative 50 degrees to postoperative 120 degrees , flexion from 55 degrees to 120 degrees, external rotation from 10 degrees to 60 degrees and internal rotation from 20 degrees to 65 degrees. The average Constant Score improved from preoperative 32 to postoperative 81 points. Arthroscopic capsular release is an effective and safe technique for the management of refractory adhesive capsulitis, avoiding prolonged disability.     

Arthroscopic Capsular Release for Painful Throwing Shoulder With Posterior Capsular Tightness

Posterior capsular tightness with glenohumeral internal rotation deficit is usually considered to be an acquired condition of the throwing shoulder and is usually treated conservatively. However, because posterior capsular tightness is sometimes irreversible, we have performed arthroscopic capsular release for painful throwing shoulder with posterior capsular tightness. The true loss of internal rotation and posterior stiffness was confirmed by examination with the patient under anesthesia, and contracture of the posterior capsule and the posterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligamant was observed arthroscopically. Because an extensive adhesion between the capsule and the fascia of the external rotators was noted, a capsular release was performed from 6 o’clock to 11 o’clock (in the right shoulder) to completely expose the muscle belly of the external rotators. Of the first 16 consecutive patients, 4 had no concomitant lesions and underwent posterior capsular release alone. With a minimum of 2 years’ follow-up, it was ascertained that the throwing pain completely disappeared in 14 patients and improved in 2. In all, 11 patients returned to their preinjury performance level, and 5 returned to a lower level of function. In the 4 patients who had no concomitant lesions, throwing pain completely disappeared, and all were able to return to their preinjury performance level.     

Arthroscopic Debridement and Capsular Release for Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint in younger, active patients presents a difficult situation to the surgeon, who would like to delay the necessity for hemiarthroplasty or total shoulder replacement until the patient is older and less active. This report outlines our technique of arthroscopic debridement and capsular release. By using electrocautery to release the rotator interval, anterior capsule, posterior capsule, and axillary recess, we have been able to improve the range of motion and to achieve pain relief. In 8 patients the mean improvement in range of motion was as follows: forward elevation, 21.4°; external rotation, 16.6°; and internal rotation, 31.1°. We believe that a reduction in joint contact pressures through a greater range of motion is the primary mechanism for pain relief resulting from capsular release.     

Arthroscopic release of the glenohumeral joint in shoulder stiffness: a review of 26 cases. French Society for Arthroscopy.

The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study of arthroscopic release of the glenohumeral joint was to evaluate the technical feasibility, the results, and the potential correlations between results and cause of the stiffness. Twenty-six shoulders in 25 patients (19 women and six men) were re-evaluated 3 to 72 months (mean, 21 months) after arthroscopic release of the glenohumeral joint. Diagnoses were primary frozen shoulder in 13 cases, bipolar stiffness (rotator cuff tear plus capsular contraction) in 3 cases, and postinjury or postsurgery stiffness in 10 cases. Results were evaluated on passive range of motion, Constant's score, and subjective assessment. Anterior or anterior inferior capsular release was done at the anterior rim of the glenoid fossa. Posterior capsule release was not performed in this series. There were no intraoperative complications. Mean range of motion gains were 86 degrees for forward elevation, 72 degrees for abduction, 34 degrees for external rotation, and 6 spinal processes for internal rotation. Constant's range of motion score increased from 12.9 out of 40 to 32 out of 40 points. Thirteen patients were very satisfied, 5 satisfied, 5 improved, and 3 unchanged. Range of motion gains were independent from the cause of shoulder stiffness, but global results were better in the primary frozen shoulder group in terms of pain and strength. Arthroscopic release of the glenohumeral joint is feasible and safe. For primary frozen shoulders, in case of failure of the functional treatment, arthroscopic release is a less traumatic alternative to manipulation under general anesthesia. For bipolar stiffness, arthroscopy provides the opportunity for treating concomitant lesions. For postsurgical stiffness, arthroscopic release improves range of motion, but the shoulder often remains painful.     

Arthroscopic capsular release for contracture of the wrist: a new technique.

SUMMARY: Stiffness of the wrist can occur following trauma or surgery. In some patients, loss of motion may be refractory to conservative treatment and operative treatment may thus be indicated. The authors report the results and technique of arthroscopic capsular release of the wrist. A cadaveric study was performed to assess the safety of arthroscopic capsular release. Arthroscopic capsular release was performed on 2 patients with limited wrist mobility. The average distance from the radiocarpal joint capsule to the neurovascular structures were 6.9 mm to the median nerve, 6.7 mm to the ulnar nerve and 5.2 mm to the radial artery. At 6 months follow-up, the average range of motion had improved from 17 degrees flexion and 10 degrees extension to 47 degrees flexion and 50 degrees extension. The average grip strength had improved from 13 to 31 kg. Pain measured on a visual analogue score (0-10) had improved from 1.5 to 1.0. There were no complications. Arthroscopic capsular release of the wrist is a safe and minimally invasive technique that provides good improvement to range of motion.     

Glenohumeral motion after complete capsular release.

The range of glenohumeral motion is primarily limited by the joint capsule. If the capsule is contracted, greater restriction in glenohumeral motion is exhibited. Release of a tight capsule has been an effective means of managing refractory stiffness of the glenohumeral joint. The effect of a complete capsular release on glenohumeral kinematics has not been previously studied in a cadaver model. Elevation, rotation, and translation of eight cadaveric glenohumeral preparations were studied before and after complete capsular release. As the intact joint was positioned near the limits of motion, glenohumeral torque rose rapidly with relatively small concomitant increases in elevation and rotational angles. Notable torque, due to tension in the capsule or cuff, ensued only after glenohumeral elevation reached approximately 80% of maximal range. After complete capsular release, maximal elevation increased on average 15%, yet retained definitive endpoints due to residual tension in the rotator cuff. Axial humeral rotation with an intact capsule decreased as maximum elevation approached, especially at elevation angles greater than 60 degrees. Maximum internal rotation was less than external, for all planes except +90 degrees. After complete capsular release, the greatest net gains for external rotation tended to be in the posterior scapular planes, whereas gains for internal rotation tended to be in the anterior scapular planes. Maximal translation in an intact vented capsule was 21 mm, 14 mm, and 15 mm in the anterior, posterior, and inferior directions, respectively. After complete capsular release, translation increased in all positions with maximal anterior, posterior, and inferior translations of 28 mm, 25 mm, and 28 mm, respectively. In general, relative gains in translation were greater in planes posterior to the scapula and at extremes of the range of motion. Although large glenohumeral translations were measured, no preparation could be dislocated before or after complete capsular release. Complete capsular release significantly increased glenohumeral range of motion and translation. The intact rotator cuff myotendinous units serves to limit the range of motion and translation after all capsuloligamentous attachments are rendered incompetent by complete capsular release.     

Early arthroscopic release in refractory shoulder stiffness

Frozen shoulder is still an enigma in shoulder surgery. It is reported that at 2 years after onset most patients will have recovered whether treated or not. To decrease time to recovery and improve the results of this condition, a number of different treatment modalities have been used. In our unit, all patients with frozen shoulder were selected for the arthroscopic release technique if a conservative program of physical therapy had failed to restore motion after 6 months and if they had no known extra-articular contractures. A prospective study was undertaken of 36 patients with refractory frozen shoulder who were treated with an arthroscopic capsulotomy between November 1997 and October 1999. There were 22 women and 14 men with an average age of 49 years (range 32-63 years). All of the patients were assessed for pain, function, and range of motion before surgery. Five patients were diabetic. An arthroscopic capsular release improved motion in all patients, with substantial relief of pain. Follow-up averaged 18 months (range 10-26 months). The median preoperative Constant score rose from 29 to 66 at the time of follow-up. By a mean of 8 weeks after treatment, 75% of the patients had returned to work. One patient developed recurrent refractory stiffness. There were no complications related to the procedure. This study demonstrates that arthroscopic capsular release can be a safe and effective tool in the management of refractory shoulder stiffness and is an effective way of shortening the course of an apparently self-limiting disease.     

Arthroscopic treatment of capsular shoulder stiffness

The shoulder capsular sitffness must be managed first by a physiotherapist and the arthroscopic release is indicated after failure. The clinical assessment is essential and reveals the loss of passive motion in specified direction. The x-rays and imaging are necessary for excluding the other etiologies of shoulder stiffness. The arthroscopic treatment is part of he treatment strategy which has to be explained to the patient. The arthroscopic treatment starts by measuring under anesthesia the loss of passive motion. The next step consists of the release of the rotator interval followed by resection of the anterior capsule. Finally, the posterior capsule is cut according to the location of the capsular retraction. The interest of the subacromial debridement is still of debate. The postoperative pain control and the rehabilitation are part of the treatment. The literature analysis demonstrates the efficiency of the arthroscopic treatment, even if the post-op care are often long. A delay of 6 months is currently necessary to obtain the final results. The main advantages of the arthroscopic treatment is to address specifically the retracted capsule and to perform a selective release which allow to start rehabilitation program early.     

The Role of Comprehensive Capsular Management in Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Advances in the understanding of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and advancements in hip arthroscopic techniques, including chondrolabral preservation and labral repair, have led to improvements in success rates, functional outcomes, and return to sports over the past several years. This improvement in outcomes also is attributed to the increased awareness of performing capsular closure after addressing intra-articular hip pathology, to preserve the biomechanical properties of the hip. A number of biomechanical studies have demonstrated that the iliofemoral ligament is a critical component of hip biomechanics, providing stability and limiting joint translation, distraction, and rotation within the normal range of hip motion. The interportal and T-capsulotomy are the most commonly used methods for accessing intra-articular pathology; both techniques require transection of the iliofemoral ligament perpendicular to its fibers, which may lead to micro- and macroinstability if left unrepaired at the end of the procedure. Several clinical studies have been published in the recent literature demonstrating that patients who undergo hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and have an unrepaired capsule have lower functional outcome scores, achievement of meaningful outcomes, success rates, as well as greater failure rates and reported pain when compared with patients who have complete capsular closure. Capsular plication of the vertical T-limb and closure of the interporal limb via plication have been reported to improved outcomes. Degree of plication is dependent on dynamic, intraoperative assessment of hip range of motion. The senior author recommends reflecting of the medial and lateral leaflets after T-capsulotomy with polyethylene sutures to provide better exposure of the peripheral compartment, which can be used for closure. The remainder of the closure is performed with a suture-passing device and approximately 2 to 3 interrupted stitches per limb.     

Anterior internal impingement

Purpose: The source of pain in patients with a stable shoulder and clinical signs of impingement is traditionally thought to be subacromial or outlet impingement, as popularized by Neer. This report introduces the concept of anterior internal impingement in patients with signs and symptoms of classic impingement syndrome and arthroscopic evidence of articular-side partial rotator cuff tear. Contact that occurs between the fragmented undersurface of the rotator cuff and the anterosuperior labrum is the apparent source of pain in these patients. Type of Study: Case series. Methods: Ten patients with a primary symptom of pain and an arthroscopic finding of a partial rotator cuff tear were reviewed. Arthroscopic visualization of the subacromial space revealed no evidence of subacromial impingement or bursitis in any patient. All patients had clinical signs and symptoms of classic impingement. The initial part of the surgical procedure consisted of a complete diagnostic arthroscopy in a low-volume gas medium using a single posterior portal. While performing the Hawkins test, the locations of any areas of abnormal soft-tissue contact and impingement were observed directly. Results: There was anterior internal impingement in all 10 patients with partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. The abnormal and fragmented rotator cuff tissue made contact with the anterior superior labrum when the shoulder was visualized from the posterior portal while performing the Hawkins test. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging correctly showed a partial-thickness rotator cuff tear in 20% of the cases. Conclusions: Recognition of anterior internal impingement as a clinical entity is important because magnetic resonance imaging results are often misleading. This is of particular importance in young patients with isolated lesions in whom arthroscopic acromioplasty and capsular reefing procedures would be unnecessary. When anterior internal impingement is recognized as the source of unresolved shoulder pain, patient selection for surgery and procedure selection can be improved.     

Addressing glenohumeral stiffness while treating the painful and stiff shoulder arthroscopically.

The shoulder can be primarily or secondarily stiff. Cadaveric cutting studies have shown increases in passive range of glenohumeral motion when certain portions of the capsule are released. This study has recorded the intraoperative gains made in passive range of motion for external rotation, flexion, abduction, and internal rotation with sequential release of the rotator interval, inferior capsule, and posterosuperior capsule, regardless of initial etiology, and followed-up over time. Thirty one of 60 shoulders, found clinically to have a loss of passive range of motion and having failed a nonoperative approach, underwent a capsular release. Eighteen patients underwent a partial capsular release (group 1) and 13 patients (group 2) underwent a complete capsular release. Thirty of 31 shoulders had statistically significant gains in passive range of motion with sequential release. In general, resection of the rotator interval contributed to gains in external rotation; resection of the inferior capsule (anteroinferior and posteroinferior) contributed gains to external rotation, forward flexion, and internal rotation; and resection of the posterosuperior capsule contributed to gains only in internal rotation. At a minimum of 18 months follow-up, 30 of 31 shoulders retained their intraoperative gains. There was no difference in the results between primarily and secondarily stiff shoulders for motion gains (P >.05). Arthroscopically addressing capsular tightness is beneficial in returning shoulders with a loss of passive glenohumeral motion to normal regardless of the etiology.     

Arthroscopic releases for arthrofibrosis of the knee

Intra-articular inflammation or fibrosis may lead to decreased soft-tissue and capsular compliance, which may result in pain or loss of motion within the knee. Etiology of intra-articular fibrosis may include isolated anterior interval scarring and posterior capsular contracture, as well as fibrosis that involves the suprapatellar pouch or arthrofibrosis that involves the entire synovial space. Initial nonsurgical management, including compression, elevation, and physical therapy, can decrease knee pain and inflammation and maintain range of motion. Surgical management is indicated in the patient who fails conservative treatment. Surgical options include arthroscopic releases of the anterior interval, posterior capsule, and peripatellar and suprapatellar regions. Recent advances in arthroscopic technique have led to improved outcomes in patients with intra-articular fibrosis of the knee.     

Arthroscopic posterior labral repair and capsular shift for traumatic unidirectional recurrent posterior subluxation of the shoulder

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of arthroscopic treatment of traumatic unidirectional recurrent posterior subluxation of the shoulder. METHODS: We treated twenty-seven patients who had traumatic unidirectional recurrent posterior subluxation of the shoulder with arthroscopic labral repair and posterior capsular shift, and we evaluated them at a mean of thirty-nine months postoperatively. Patients who had posteroinferior instability, multidirectional instability, or an atraumatic onset or who were undergoing revision were excluded. There were twenty-five male and two female patients with a mean age of twenty-one years (range, fourteen to thirty-three years). All patients were involved in sports activity, and all had had a substantial injury prior to the onset of the instability. Results were assessed on the basis of stability, motion, and UCLA (University of California at Los Angeles), ASES (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons), and Rowe scores. Pain and function were also evaluated with visual analog scales. RESULTS: All patients had one or more lesions in the posteroinferior aspect of the labrum and capsule. The most common finding was incomplete stripping of the posteroinferior aspect of the labrum (eighteen patients). At the arthroscopy, the posteroinferior aspect of the capsule appeared to be stretched in twenty-two patients. At the time of follow-up, all patients had improved shoulder function and scores (p < 0.01). All patients also had a stable shoulder according to subjective and objective measurements, except for one patient who had recurrent subluxation. Except for that patient, all patients were able to return to their prior sports activity with little or no limitation. Shoulder function was graded as >90% of the preinjury level in twenty-four patients. There were twenty-one excellent UCLA scores, five good scores, and one fair score. The average pain score improved from 4.5 points preoperatively to 0.2 point at the time of follow-up (p < 0.0001). The mean loss of internal rotation was one vertebral level. There were no operative complications. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic posterior labral repair and capsular shift to treat traumatic unidirectional recurrent posterior subluxation is a reliable procedure with respect to providing stability, pain relief, and functional restoration.     

Arthroscopic capsular release for stiff shoulders

Purpose: The etiology, pathogenesis, time course, and response to treatment of stiff shoulder pathology is still under investigation and debate. This prospective study evaluated arthroscopic capsular release to treat stiff shoulder pathology that was resistant to conservative management. The etiology of the shoulder stiffness was categorized and analyzed for effect on outcomes. Type of Study: Operative technique and prospective evaluation. Methods: In 68 stiff shoulders (41 in women, 27 in men) that underwent arthroscopic capsular release, 5 distinct etiologies were identified: postsurgical in 20, idiopathic in 17, post-traumatic in 15, diabetic in 8, and impingement syndrome (prior primary impingement developing stiffness) in 8. Average age was 50 years (range, 29 to 72), and follow-up averaged 3 years (range, 2 to 8). Prior to this procedure, duration of symptoms averaged 7.3 months (range, 3 to 48), and formal physical therapy averaged 3.7 months (range, 1 to 12). Preoperative average American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score (ASES) was 35.5 (range, 10 to 77), median Simple Shoulder Test (SST) was 3 (0 to 10), and median Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain was 6 (0 to 10). Average active forward elevation (FE) was 92°, external rotation (ER) at side was 12°, and median internal rotation (IR) was to the buttock. All patients underwent arthroscopic capsular release with a standard aftercare protocol. Results: The study population showed significant improvement (P < .0001) for all outcome scores and active motion parameters. Average and median outcome parameters for the population, with improvement in parenthesis were: ASES 93 (+57.5), SST 10 (+7), VAS 0 (−6), FE 165° (+73°), ER at side 56° (+44°), and IR to T −12 (+7 spinal segments). The time in formal physical therapy averaged 2.3 months (2 to 20 weeks) and time to attain final, pain-free range of motion averaged 2.8 months (1 to 6). Outcomes for, and between, each etiology were analyzed. There was no difference in time to final motion between the etiologic groups. Conclusions: Stiff shoulder pathology can result from a variety of differing etiologic factors. Arthroscopic capsular release was equally effective across the 5 identified etiologic groups, and provided significant pain relief, restoration of motion, and function within an average of 3 months.     

The role of arthroscopy for the problem shoulder arthroplasty

Between 1995 and 2000, 29 patients who had excessive pain or limitation of motion after a shoulder arthroplasty underwent arthroscopy. Preoperative diagnoses of impingement syndrome in 10 patients (treated by arthroscopic subacromial decompression), large rotator cuff tear in 1, loose bodies in 1, unstable cuff arthropathy in 1, and septic arthritis in another were confirmed at arthroscopy. Of the 15 patients without a preoperative diagnosis, 7 had postarthroplasty capsular fibrosis, with 6 undergoing arthroscopic capsular release. A malpositioned glenoid component was found in 1 patient. Loose or worn components were found in 4 of the shoulders, impingement with a small partial-thickness cuff tear was identified in 1, a florid synovitis was present in another, and in 1 no abnormality could be found. The procedures were often hindered by limited access and reflection from the prosthesis. Arthroscopy after shoulder arthroplasty is useful for the diagnosis and treatment of pain and loss of motion in selected patients but can be technically challenging.     

Arthroscopic treatment of post-traumatic elbow contracture

The purpose of this study was to evaluate range of motion and patient-reported outcome after complete arthroscopic release of post-traumatic elbow contracture. Fourteen consecutive patients who underwent elbow arthroscopy and capsular release were reviewed retrospectively at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Pain and range of motion were measured. Patient outcome was assessed with the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Elbow Assessment Form. Mean self-reported satisfaction on a visual analog scale was 8.4 out of 10. Only 6 patients continued to have pain, with a mean maximum pain score of 4.6 out of 10. Flexion increased from a mean of 117.5 degrees to 133 degrees, and extension improved from a mean of 35.4 degrees to 9.3 degrees. In those patients with a preoperative arc of motion less than 100 degrees (10 patients), the mean arc of motion improved from 69 degrees to 119 degrees. All patients had improved function after the procedure, with a mean self-reported functional ability score of 28.3 out of 30. There were no neurovascular complications. The improvement in range of motion and functional outcome compares favorably with open-release procedures. Combined with the potential benefits of improved joint visualization and low surgical morbidity, arthroscopic release of post-traumatic elbow contracture appears to be a reasonable alternative to open techniques.     

Effect of selective capsulorrhaphy on the passive range of motion of the glenohumeral joint

BACKGROUND: Capsulorrhaphy of the glenohumeral joint is a common surgical procedure for the treatment of instability caused by increased capsular laxity. The effect of capsulorrhaphy on the range of motion of the shoulder is poorly understood. METHODS: We simulated localized capsular contractures by selective capsular plications in eight human cadaveric shoulders and studied the effect of such plications on the passive range of glenohumeral abduction, flexion, and external and internal rotation in different degrees of abduction. A 0.5 or 1-N-m torque was applied to the humerus, and the range of glenohumeral motion was measured with electronic goniometers in three planes and compared with those of the intact shoulder. RESULTS: Anterosuperior capsular plication most markedly affected external rotation of the adducted arm, decreasing it by a mean of 30.1 degrees (p < 0.0001). Anteroinferior plication significantly reduced abduction by a mean of 19.4 degrees (p < 0.0001) and external rotation by a mean of 20.6 degrees (p = 0.0046). Posterosuperior plication mostly limited internal rotation of the adducted arm (mean decrease, 16.1 degrees, p = 0.0045). On the average, total anterior and total posterior plication each limited flexion by approximately 20 degrees (p = 0.005) and abduction by >or=15 degrees (p < 0.005), whereas total anterior plication limited external rotation by >30 degrees (p 20 degrees (p < 0.0001). Total inferior capsular plication restricted abduction (by a mean of 27.7 degrees, p = 0.0001), flexion, and rotation. Total superior plication restricted external rotation and flexion. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Localized plications of the glenohumeral joint capsule lead to predictable patterns of loss of glenohumeral mobility. If plication is planned, losses of movement can be anticipated. The findings of this study may assist surgeons in identifying the parts of the capsule that are contracted and that may need lengthening.     

Arthroscopic capsular release for the treatment of refractory postoperative or post-fracture shoulder stiffness.

BACKGROUND: Arthroscopic capsular release is used to treat idiopathic adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) that is refractory to nonoperative treatment or manipulation under anesthesia. The role of arthroscopic capsular release in the treatment of frozen shoulder after shoulder surgery or fracture is less clearly understood. The purposes of this study were to define the outcome of arthroscopic capsular release in the management of frozen shoulder after surgery or fracture and to compare these results with those of arthroscopic capsular release in the treatment of idiopathic frozen shoulder. METHODS: We evaluated the results of arthroscopic capsular release in three different groups of patients with shoulder contracture refractory to nonoperative management and manipulation under anesthesia. The three groups consisted of patients who had an idiopathic frozen shoulder, shoulder stiffness after surgery, or shoulder stiffness after fracture. We evaluated pain, function, patient satisfaction, and range of motion in all three groups before and after the study treatment. RESULTS: At a mean of twenty months (range, twelve to forty-six months) after the operation, fifty patients were available for assessment of function and range of motion of the involved shoulder. At the time of follow-up, each group had a significant improvement in the scores for pain, patient satisfaction, and functional activity as well as in the overall outcome score (p < 0.01). Comparison of the scores among the different groups revealed that all had a similar degree of improvement in range of motion of the involved shoulder, but patients with postoperative frozen shoulder had significantly (p < 0.05) lower scores for pain (p < 0.03), patient satisfaction (p < 0.004), and functional activity (p < 0.002) than did those with idiopathic or post-fracture frozen shoulder. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic capsular release was as effective for improving range of motion in patients with postoperative contracture of the shoulder as it was in patients with idiopathic and post-fracture contracture. However, there was less improvement in the subjective scores for pain, function, and patient satisfaction in the postoperative group.     

Arthroscopic release of adhesive capsulitis

Twenty-five patients with primary adhesive capsulitis underwent an arthroscopic release of the capsule of the shoulder joint. They were reviewed after a mean of 14.8 months (range, 3-40 months). Night pain and awakening were a feature in all 25 patients preoperatively but were only found in 3 postoperatively. There was marked improvement in pain from a preoperative visual analog scale score of 3.1 to a postoperative visual analog scale score of 12.6 on a scale of 15. Passive movement of the joint improved significantly, with mean passive elevation changing from 73.7 degrees preoperatively to 163 degrees postoperatively, mean passive external rotation changing from 10.6 degrees preoperatively to 46.8 degrees postoperatively, and passive internal rotation improving by a mean of 9 levels. The mean preoperative Constant score of 25.3 improved to 75.5 postoperatively, and the Constant score adjusted for age and gender averaged 91%. All patients completed the Short Form-36 questionnaire at their review, revealing a norm-based physical summary score of 48.7, falling within 1 SD of a normal population sample. This arthroscopic surgical technique is derived from the open surgical release. It is founded upon an understanding of the pathology of this condition. It appears to yield rapid relief of pain and dramatic improvement in movement and function in this painful and otherwise protracted condition.