Worse six-month outcome for patients with multiple stents in a single coronary artery

BACKGROUND: Before the "era" of optimal stent deployment, very few data concerning multiple stents in a single coronary artery showed restenosis rates up to 60%. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the 6-month outcome of patients receiving multiple Palmaz-Schatz stents (> or =2 stents) in a single coronary artery compared to those receiving single stents. METHODS: Three hundred and forty-eight patients having multiple stents were compared to 174 patients receiving single stents during a 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Repeat target lesion revascularization (RTLR), either repeat PTCA or CABG, was 10.4% in the single-stent group, 22.6% in the two-stent group, and 23.1% in the > or =2 stent group (p = 0.001, single versus 2 or > or =2 stents). There was not a significant difference between single stent and multiple stent groups in myocardial infarction and death during 6-month follow-up. Multivariate analysis showed multiple stents, diabetes mellitus, and type C lesion to be predictors of RTLR. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of two or more stents was associated with a significantly higher RTLR compared with single stent placement. The optimal approach to diffuse coronary artery disease remains to be defined.     

Use of stents for small coronary arteries. Results of the Multi-Link 2.5 Portuguese Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Stents are being used with increasing frequency in percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) but their use in small vessels is still controversial, due to the possibility of excessively high rates of adverse events and restenosis. OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and clinical efficacy of ACS RX Multi-Link (ML) 2.5 mm stents, in "de novo" coronary stenosis. DESIGN: Prospective Registry, with 6 months clinical follow-up, involving all Portuguese centers of Interventional Cardiology. POPULATION: Between April 7 and November 20 1998, 102 patients were enrolled, 82 male and with ages ranging from 30 to 86 years (average 58 +/- 11). Clinical presentation for PTCA was stable angina in 53%, unstable angina in 36% and silent ischemia in 11%. There was a history of previous myocardial infarction in 29% of patients. The main risk factors were hypertension (58%), hyperlipidemia (57%), smoking (25%) and diabetes (20%). Multivessel coronary artery disease was present in 46% of patients and left ventricular function was normal in 89%. Of the 217 existing lesions, 188 (87%) were treated: 35 with balloon angioplasty and 153 with stent implantation, 114 of which were ML 2.5 mm: 79 of 15 mm in length and 35 of 25 mm. METHODS: Angiographic success with ML stent implantation and major adverse cardiac events (MACE)--myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), new target vessel revascularizations and death--were evaluated during hospital stay, and at 1 and 6 months clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Angiographic success was 97.4%. In one patient it was not possible to cross the lesion, in another there was stent migration and in a third distal coronary flow after stenting was TIMI grade 1. Clinical success was 96.1% and there were no cases of death, Q-wave MI or urgent CABG. Two patients had non-Q wave MI and two required urgent repeat angioplasty. Subacute stent thrombosis occurred in 1 patient. There were no additional MACE at 1 month follow-up. At 6-month follow-up (in 97% of patients) MACE had occurred in 14.1%: 2 deaths (one non-cardiac), 3 MI (one non-Q) and 14 new PTCA (one in a non-ML stent). There was no need for CABG in any patient. Six-month survival rate was 97.9%, 94.9% were free of infarction and 84.8% were free of infarction and new revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-Link 2.5 mm stent implantation appears to be safe and efficient with a low incidence of immediate and 6-month adverse events in the range of centers and operators of the Registry.     

Is the Outcome of Coronary Stenting Worse in Elderly Patients?

Initial reports of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in the elderly (≥: 75 years) showed a significantly lower primary success rate, higher in-hospital mortality, and a higher risk of emergency or elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) compared to younger patients. There are few data concerning acute outcomes and clinical follow-up after the use of coronary stenting in the elderly compared to < the 75-year-old age group. We evaluated 82 elderly patients and 280 younger patients who received Palmaz-Schatz stents during 1995, at a time when high pressure deployment and antiplatelet therapy was routinely used. The success rate and acute major complications were not significantly different between the elderly and younger patients. Clinical events (death, myocardial infarction [MI], repeat PTCA, or CABG) during 6-month follow-up were also not significantly different. Coronary stenting in the elderly can be carried out with a high success rate and low incidence of acute major complications. Thus, short-term clinical outcomes in elderly patients appear similar to results obtained in younger patients.     

Effect of bare metal stenting on angiographic and clinical outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention of nonacute occluded coronary arteries: a report from the Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA).

The outcome after PTCA and coronary stenting of nonacute total coronary occlusions in the diabetic population is unknown. The main objective of the present report was to compare the angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes in the diabetic and nondiabetic patients who were enrolled in the Total Occlusion Study of Canada (TOSCA), a prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of primary stenting versus PTCA alone in nonacute native coronary artery occlusions. Of the 410 patients enrolled, 68 (16.5%) were diabetics. At 6-month follow-up, stenting resulted in significant improvement in angiographic outcome compared to PTCA alone in both diabetic and nondiabetic populations. Angiographic restenosis was significantly reduced by stenting in the nondiabetic population (69.3% vs. 55.2%; P = 0.009). A reduction in restenosis of a similar magnitude was observed with stenting in the diabetic population (71.1% vs. 59.3%; P = NS). At 1-year clinical follow-up, composite adverse cardiac event rates were similar for both strategies regardless of diabetic status. Target vessel revascularization was reduced by stenting compared to PTCA in diabetics (20% vs. 31.6%) and nondiabetics (21.5% vs. 30%). A significant reduction for any vessel revascularization following stenting compared to PTCA was observed in the nondiabetic population (28.5% vs. 38.8%; P = 0.05) but not in the diabetic subgroup (36.7% vs. 42%; P = NS). In conclusion, stenting appeared to be superior to PTCA alone, resulting in similar magnitude of reduction in angiographic restenosis and target vessel revascularization rates in diabetics and nondiabetics. Restenosis rates in all groups remain high. This analysis forms an important background for future studies that are needed to examine the effect of stenting with drug-eluting stents in diabetics as well as nondiabetics with nonacute coronary occlusions.     

Does platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antibody improve in-hospital outcome of coronary stenting in high-risk thrombus containing lesions?

Coronary stenting in acute coronary syndromes probably increases the risk of acute stent thrombosis. Recently, use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antibody has been shown to improve percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) outcomes in high risk lesions. The purpose of this analysis was to determine safety and efficacy of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antibody administration in patients receiving coronary stents in high-risk lesions. Between October 1995 and November 1996, 282 patients with acute ischemic syndromes received coronary stents at our center: 73 had thrombus containing lesions—40 presented with AMI and 33 with unstable angina and make up the study population. The mean age of these patients was 61 ± 13 years, 56 were male, 35 had a history of myocardial infarctions (MI), 21 had prior coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and 21 had prior PTCA. Coronary stenting was used for suboptimal result in 46 patients (63%), threatened closure in 25 patients (34%), and acute closure in 2 patients (3%). Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antibody was administered during the procedure in 74% and after the procedure in 26%. A total of 115 stents were deployed (Gianturco-Roubin 80, Palmaz-Schatz 29, and Wallstent 6) in 24 LAD, 21 RCA, 15 LCX, and 13 saphenous vein graft (SVG) lesions. Procedural success was 100%. The mean diameter stenosis before and after intervention was 60% ± 31% and 4% ± 14%, respectively. In-hospital events included 1 Q-wave MI (1.4%), 13 non–Q-wave MI (18%), and 1 death (1.4%). There was no subacute stent thrombosis, emergency CABG, or repeat PTCA. Significant in-hospital bleeding complications were noted in seven (10%) patients, with five patients (6.8%) requiring blood transfusions. In this series of patients with acute ischemic syndromes associated with angiographic evidence of thrombus, combined use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antibody and stenting resulted in a very low incidence of subacute stent thrombosis and emergency target lesion revascularization. However, bleeding complications were higher than expected with conventional antiplatelet therapy following routine stenting. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 46:415–420, 1999. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Coronary stenting in patients with depressed left ventricular function: acute and long-term results in a selected population.

Percutaneous coronary angioplasty (PTCA) in patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with increased acute and late mortality; in contrast to plain PTCA, results of stenting in these patients have not been characterized. To assess the current outcome of stenting in patients with LV dysfunction, results from 80 patients procedures were analyzed. Intervention for acute myocardial infarction (MI) was excluded; 21% of patients had unstable angina and 30% had a recent MI. Mean LVEF was 40 +/- 9% (range, 25-45%). Multivessel revascularization was done in 25 patients (31%), with a total of 114 lesions treated. Prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump was used in only two patients. Angiographic and clinical success was achieved in 79/80 patients (99%). There were no in-hospital deaths, one patient (1%) had a non-Q-wave MI, and no patients required emergency bypass surgery (CABG). All patients completed at least 6 months follow-up (mean, 30 +/- 14 months): 64 patients (80%) remained asymptomatic, 4 (5%) had acute MI, and 5 (6%) died. In-stent restenosis occurred in five patients (6%); of these, three required repeat PTCA, three patients (4%) underwent subsequent elective CABG. Including patients with repeat intervention, 67 patients (84%) are clinically improved; actuarial event-free survival was 87% at 56-month follow-up. Thus, stenting in patients with impaired LVEF is associated with excellent outcome and lower mortality than previously reported for balloon angioplasty alone. Whether coronary stenting may be a therapeutic strategy equivalent to surgery in selected patients needs to be investigated in prospective randomized trials.     

Late outcome of multivessel coronary artery disease after angioplasty or bypass surgery

Background. Results from randomized trials to determine optimal treatment for patients with multivessel coronary disease are not yet available. Thus, the early and late outcomes of 191 PTCA and 221 CABG patients done in 1985-86 were evaluated. Methods and Results. CABG patients selected had more coronary risk factors and more severe coronary artery disease compared to PTCA patients. Comparison of the initial outcome showed that clinical success without major cardiovascular events was similar (93.7% for PTCA vs. 90.0% for CABG; p=n.s.). Five year followup was obtained in 99.0% of PTCA patients and 94.4% of CABG patients. In the PTCA group, 89.8% were alive, 4.8% had sustained an MI, and repeat revascularization was required in 46.8%. In the CABG group, 87.1% were alive, 3.2% had had a MI, and 3.5% required repeat revascularization. Statistical comparison demonstrated no difference between the groups in survival or late cardiac events, but rate of repeat revascularization was significantly higher for PTCA patients (p less than 0.0001). Incompleteness of revascularization (p<0.01) was independently associated with an increased need for repeat revascularization in the PTCA group. In the CABG group, depressed left ventricular function (p less than 0.001) and female sex (p<0.01) were associated with lower survival rates. An analysis of cost per patient showed that the strategies were comparable. Conclusions. PTCA and CABG in multivessel disease patients have similar early results and comparable rates of survival and late cardiac events. Significantly more repeat revascularization is required in PTCA patients to maintain these results.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

How to treat diabetic patients with multivesseal disease in the DES era

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus represent the 25% of those requiring myocardial revascularization. Choice of treatment in diabetic patients is much more controversial than in non-diabetics: this because coronary artery disease is more often complex and diffuse, left ventricular function is depressed, and concomitant multiple risk factors are present. These subset of patients experience worse outcomes than non diabetic patients undergoing either coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Large randomized trials performed both in the early era of PCI and in the stent era suggest that CABG is superior to bare metal stent implantation in the treatment of diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. These findings are reflected in current guidelines, which favor CABG over PCI in most diabetics who require revascularization. However, substantial variability exists in practice patterns among individual hospital, suggesting a lack of clinical consensus. The major advantage of CABG over bare metal stent implantation in diabetic patients is the lower risk of repeat revascularization procedures through the follow-up. Better angiographic results have been demonstrated in the new era of drug-eluting stents (DES). Data from both the sirolimus and paclitaxel-eluting stents trials support the potential advantage of DES implantation both in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Preliminary data from studies comparing DES versus CABG in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease suggests that 1) no significant difference exists in the 12-month rate of death, myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular events in patients treated with DES as compared to off-pump bypass surgery, 2) a difference of 7.1% in the rate of repeat revascularization at 12-month exists in favor of bypass surgery and 3) diabetic retinopathy identifies a subgroup with poor outcome after both percutaneous and surgical myocardial revascularization.     

Stenting of bifurcation lesions: classification, treatments, and results.

Percutaneous transluminal balloon coronary angioplasty (PTCA) of coronary bifurcations is associated with a low success rate, high rate of complications, and high incidence of target vessel revascularization (TVR). The strategy of systematic coronary stenting in bifurcation lesions involving a side branch >/= 2.2 mm in diameter was prospectively evaluated in a single-center observational study during a 35-month inclusion period. All patients meeting these criteria were consecutively included. Bifurcation lesions and treatment were predefined in the study. The study included 366 patients (12.1% of PTCA) with 373 bifurcation lesions, mean age 63.7 +/- 11.6 years, 79.2% male, 46.7% with unstable angina, and 8.3% acute MI. The left anterior descending/diagonal bifurcation was involved in 55.2% of cases, circumflex/marginal 22. 2%, PDA/PLA 10.4%, left main bifurcation in 6.8%, and others 5.4%. The main branch (2.78 +/- 0.42 mm reference diameter) was stented in 96.3% of cases and the side branch (2.44 +/- 0.43 mm) in 63.2% (the two branches were stented in 59.5% of cases). Procedural success was obtained in 96.3% in both branches and 99.4% in the main branch. At1-month follow-up, The major cardiac event rate (MACE) was 4.8% (death 1.1%, emergency CABG 0.6%, Q-wave MI 0.9%, acute or subacute closure 1.4%, repeat PTCA 1.1%, and non-Q-wave MI 2.3%). At 7-month follow-up, the total MACCE rate was 21.6%, including a TVR rate of 17.2%. Analysis of the 7-month outcome according to two study periods (period I, 1 January 1996 to 31 August 1997, 182 patients; period II, 1 September 1997 to 30 June 1998, 127 patients) showed that the TVR rate decreased from 20.6% to 13.8% (P = 0.04) and the MACE rate from 29.2% to 17.1% (P < 0.01) in period I and II, respectively. This was associated by univariate analysis with an increasing use of tubular stents deployed in the main branch (94.2% vs. 59.1%, P < 0.001) and kissing balloon inflation after coronary stenting (75.4% vs. 18.1%, P < 0.001). Bifurcation lesions are frequent. Procedural success of coronary stenting is high with a low rate of in-hospital MACE. TVR rate at follow-up is relatively low. In-hospital and follow-up results are influenced not only by the learning curve but also by the use of tubular stents in the main branch and final kissing balloon inflation.     

Influence of diabetes mellitus on long-term (five-year) outcomes of drug-eluting stents and coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary revascularization

Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) and for diffuse and progressive atherosclerosis. We evaluated the outcomes of drug-eluting stent (DES) placement and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 891 diabetic patients (489 for DES implantation and 402 for CABG) and 2,151 nondiabetic patients (1,058 for DES implantation and 1,093 for CABG) with multivessel CAD treated from January 2003 through December 2005 and followed up for a median 5.6 years. Outcomes of interest included death; the composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke; and repeat revascularization. In diabetic patients, after adjusting for baseline covariates, 5-year risk of death (hazard ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.77 to 1.33, p = 0.96) and the composite of death, MI, or stroke (hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 1.31, p = 0.91) were similar in patients undergoing DES or CABG. However, rate of repeat revascularization was significantly higher in the DES group (hazard ratio 3.69, 95% confidence interval 2.64 to 5.17, p <0.001). These trends were consistent in nondiabetic patients (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.55 to 1.16, p = 0.23 for death; hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.56 to 1.05, p = 0.10 for composite of death, MI, or stroke; hazard ratio 2.77, 95% CI 1.95 to 3.91, p <0.001 for repeat revascularization). There was no significant interaction between diabetic status and treatment strategy on clinical outcomes (p for interaction = 0.36 for death; 0.20 for the composite of death, MI, or stroke; and 0.40 for repeat revascularization). In conclusion, there was no significant prognostic influence of diabetes on long-term treatment with DES or CABG in patients with multivessel CAD.     

Procedural results and intermediate clinical outcomes after multiple saphenous vein graft stenting

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the early and mid-term (18-month) clinical events in a consecutive series of patients undergoing a nonstaged multiple saphenous vein grafting (SVG) intervention with stents as compared with a single SVG stent procedure. BACKGROUND: Saphenous vein graft angioplasty has been limited by high rates of distal embolization, myocardial infarction, restenosis and late mortality. It is unknown whether stenting of multiple, different SVGs at the same setting is associated with higher risk. METHODS: We evaluated in-hospital and mid-term clinical outcomes (death, Q wave myocardial infarction [MI] and repeat revascularization rates up to 18 months) in 70 consecutive patients treated with coronary stents in 2 (93% of patients) or 3 SVGs, as compared with 649 patients undergoing stenting of a single SVG between January 1, 1994 and December 31, 1997. RESULTS: Overall procedural success was obtained in 97% of patients with 2 or 3 SVGs and 97% of patients with a single SVG (p = 0.94). Procedural complications were also similar (2.8% for multiple SVGs vs. 2.7% for a single SVG, p = 0.94). There was a higher prevalence of periprocedural non-Q wave MI (28% vs. 16%, p = 0.009) in the multiple SVG group. During follow-up (18 months), target lesion revascularization was 11% in multiple SVG and 15% in single SVG interventions (p = 0.19), and repeat revascularization (calculated per treated patient) was also similar for both groups (19% vs. 18%, p = 0.94). There was no difference in death (5.6% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.92) and Q wave MI rate (4.3% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.55) after the multiple SVG intervention. Overall cardiac event-free survival was similar for both groups (62% vs. 60%, p = 0.75). The study was powered to detect a clinically meaningful difference of 10% in mortality; smaller differences could not be evaluated on the basis of this sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous stenting of multiple SVGs in carefully selected patients has similar in-hospital procedural success and major complications rates, as well as mid-term (18-month) clinical outcomes, as compared with single SVG stenting. Thus, multiple SVG interventions using stents may be a viable revascularization strategy for carefully selected patients and suitable lesions in multiple SVG disease.     

Multi-vessel coronary stenting--procedural results and late clinical outcomes: a comparison with single-vessel stenting

The purpose of this study was to assess the 1-year clinical outcome of patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease (CAD) who underwent coronary stenting, and to compare the results with single-vessel coronary stenting carried out during the same period. We evaluated the in-hospital and 12-month clinical outcomes [death, Q-wave myocardial infarction (MI) and repeat revascularization rates at one year] in 384 consecutive patients treated with coronary stents in 2 (92% of patients) or 3 of the native coronary arteries and compared the outcome to 624 consecutive patients undergoing stenting in a single coronary artery between January 1, 1997 and January 31, 1999. The overall procedural success was obtained in 99% of patients with 2- or 3-vessel stenting and 98% of patients with single-vessel stenting. Procedural complications were similar (2.9% vs 2.6%; p = 0.12). During follow-up, target lesion revascularization was 16% in multi-vessel and 14% in single-vessel stenting (p = 0.38) and repeat revascularization was also similar for both groups (19% vs. 20%; p = 0.73). There was no difference in death (0.8% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.31) and Q-wave MI (0.7% vs. 1.4%; p = 0. 16) in the 2 groups. Overall cardiac event-free survival was similar for both groups (76% vs. 78%; p = 0.54). Multi-vessel stenting in carefully selected patients in our experience had a high procedural success with very low complication rates. The one-year clinical outcomes were acceptable and were similar to the results of single-vessel stenting.     

Short- and long-term results after multivessel stenting in diabetic patients

OBJECTIVES: The present study evaluated clinical outcomes in diabetic patients after multivessel stenting. BACKGROUND: Multivessel angioplasty studies have reported decreased survival in diabetic patients undergoing conventional balloon angioplasty compared with coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, several studies have demonstrated excellent procedural success and acceptable clinical outcomes after multivessel stenting. METHODS: Multivessel stenting was performed in 689 patients with 1,639 native coronary lesions. Patients were classified into three groups according to diabetes mellitus (DM) status: 1) no DM (501 patients/1,200 lesions); 2) DM treated with oral agents (102 patients/235 lesions); and 3) DM treated with insulin (86 patients/204 lesions). RESULTS: Procedural success was high overall. In-hospital CABG was higher in diabetics treated with insulin compared with the other two groups (3.5% vs. 0.4% vs. 1.0%, p = 0.02). There were no significant differences in the incidence of in-hospital cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Diabetic patients treated with oral agents or insulin had higher one-year target lesion revascularization rates than non-diabetic patients (25% vs. 35% vs. 16%, p < 0.001). Lower one-year survival was observed in diabetic patients treated with either oral agents or insulin, compared with non-diabetic patients (85% vs. 86% vs. 95%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, DM was an independent predictor of one-year mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization after multivessel stenting. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a high technical success rate of multivessel stenting, diabetic patients, especially those treated with insulin, have higher in-hospital CABG, higher subsequent revascularization rates, and lower one-year survival than non-diabetic patients.     

Efficacy of repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for coronary restenosis

The short- and long-term outcome of patients within the NHLBI PTCA Registry who underwent repeat PTCA for coronary restenosis were analyzed. Of 1,880 patients in whom an initial PTCA was successful, 203 had a repeat PTCA attempted after restenosis developed. Repeat PTCA was usually performed within 6 months of the first procedure. The success rate of repeat PTCA was 85.2%. As a direct result of repeat PTCA, 1.5% of patients had an MI and 2% required emergency CABG. No patien died as a result of the attempted second procedure. One to 3 years of follow-up information was available in 94% of eligible patients. Most patients (75,9%) did not have a subsequent (third) PTCA, CABG or an MI. The late mortality rate was 0.8%. Angiographic follow-up information was available in 62 patients. Sustained enhancement of the diameter of the redilated lesion was observed in 66%. Thus, repeat PTCA has a high success and a low complication rate. Most patients did not have subsequent restenosis and are free of angina. Hence, repeat PTCA should be recommended for patients who have restenosis and should be considered as an integral component of PTCA therapy.     

Comparison of outcomes using sirolimus-eluting stenting in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with comparison of insulin versus non-insulin therapy in the diabetic patients

The effect of insulin therapy on adverse cardiovascular outcomes in diabetic patients has been debated and a reduced benefit in clinical restenosis outcomes after sirolimus stenting has been reported among diabetic patients requiring insulin therapy. We analyzed 297 diabetic patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents, including 115 (39%) on insulin therapy, and compared outcomes with 541 nondiabetic patients treated consecutively during the same interval. The rates of target lesion revascularization (9.5% vs 3.5%, p = 0.003) and cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI, 7.1% vs 3.1%, p = 0.012) were significantly higher for diabetic patients. Insulin treatment was independently associated with increased risk for target lesion revascularization (odds ratio [OR] 2.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22 to 5.00) and cardiac death or MI (hazard ratio [HR] 2.85, 95% CI 1.41 to 5.77), whereas the adjusted risk for diabetic patients not treated with insulin was not significantly different from patients without diabetes for target lesion revascularization (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.66 to 2.62) or cardiac death or MI (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.50 to 2.17). In conclusion, diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risk for target lesion revascularization and cardiac death or MI after receiving sirolimus-eluting stenting, and is significantly exaggerated by the requirement for insulin therapy.     

Long-term clinical outcome of rescue balloon angioplasty compared with rescue stenting after failed thrombolysis

Failed thrombolysis following acute myocardial infarction is associated with a poor prognosis. Balloon angioplasty with or without stenting is an established procedure in acute myocardial infarction and for failed thrombolysis (rescue percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty [PTCA]). Intracoronary stenting improves initial success rates, decreases incidence of abrupt closure, and reduces the rate of restenosis after angioplasty. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of rescue PTCA with rescue stenting in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction after failed thrombolysis. Clinical data are from a retrospective review of 102 patients requiring rescue balloon angioplasty or stenting after failed thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction. There was a greater incidence of recurrent angina in 11 patients (22%) in the rescue PTCA group versus 2 patients (4%) in the rescue stenting group. The in-hospital recurrent myocardial infarction rate was 14% in the rescue PTCA group versus 2% in the stented group. In the rescue PTCA cohort, 11 patients (22%) required in-hospital repeat revascularization versus 2 patients in the stented group. The in-hospital mortality rate was higher in the PTCA group (10%) versus that in the stent group (2%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postdischarge deaths. Rescue stenting is superior to rescue angioplasty. The procedure is associated with lower in-hospital angina and recurrent myocardial infarction, and the need for fewer repeat revascularizations. Long-term patients treated with stents required fewer revascularization procedures. Overall, rescue stenting was associated with a significantly lower mortality.     

二代支架时代数据中糖尿病对无保护左主干患者不同血运重建术预后的影响

目的:在二代支架时代,糖尿病对不同血运重建策略治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病患者的影响尚未可知。方法:回顾性入选823例无保护左主干冠状动脉疾病的患者,其中接受二代药物洗脱支架(DES)置入治疗的患者331例(糖尿病患者,n=99;非糖尿病患者,n=232),接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者492例(糖尿病患者,n=127;非糖尿病患者,n=365)。我们根据不同的血运重建策略比较了糖尿病对临床结果的影响。结果:在接受血运重建的无保护左主干病变患者中,糖尿病患者占27.5%(226/823)。经过平均25.3个月的随访后发现,在接受DES治疗的人群中,糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者的全因死亡率、心源性死亡率、血运重建发生率、卒中和主要不良心脑血管事件的发生率没有显著差异。然而,在全因死亡/心肌梗死/卒中联合终点(糖尿病组21.5%vs.非糖尿病7.2%,P=0.001)及心肌梗死发生率(糖尿病组15.4%vs.非糖尿病组1.6%,P<0.001)中,糖尿病患者明显高于非糖尿病患者。在接受CABG治疗的群体中,糖尿病组和非糖尿病组所有临床终点发生率相似。结论:在二代药物洗脱支架治疗无保护左主干病变的患者中,合并糖尿病的患者较非糖尿病组预后较差,在接受CABG的患者中,糖尿病和非糖尿病组预后相似。     

Effect of diabetes mellitus on five-year clinical outcomes after single-vessel coronary stenting (a pooled analysis of coronary stent clinical trials)

Diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk of clinically driven, repeat revascularization of the stented lesion in the first year after coronary stenting. The effect of DM on the risk of repeat revascularization of the stented lesion beyond 1 year, revascularization at other coronary sites, and clinical outcomes of cardiac death and myocardial infarction (MI) has not been reported. We pooled primary data from 4 multicenter trials of second-generation coronary stents that included 1,228 patients, 263 of whom (21%) had DM. Patients were followed annually to assess for prespecified end points, including repeat revascularization procedures, death, or MI. Repeat revascularization of the stented lesion was performed more frequently during the first year in patients with DM (16.0% vs 10.9%, p = 0.01) but decreased to a low frequency (1.8% vs 1.3% per year) thereafter in patients with and without DM. Repeat revascularization of other coronary segments was more frequent in patients with DM during the first and subsequent years (5-year rates, 32.2% vs 24.1%, p = 0.005). Cardiac death or MI was also more frequent among patients with DM (5-year rates, 25.4% vs 17.9%, p = 0.008) and remained significant after adjustment for all differences in baseline characteristics (hazard ratio 1.5, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 2.0, p = 0.01). In conclusion, diabetic patients are at increased risk for revascularization of the stented lesion only in the first year after single-lesion stenting but are at increased risk for other clinical events, including cardiac death and MI, over the next 4 years.     

Early and intermediate term clinical outcome after multiple coronary stenting

Objective—To examine the immediate and intermediate term clinical outcome of multiple coronary stenting.
Design—Consecutive patients were prospectively entered on a dedicated database. Follow up information was obtained from outpatient and telephone interviews with patients and family physicians.
Setting—A tertiary referral centre.
Patients—140 consecutive patients underwent multiple coronary stenting between April 1994 and November 1996. Most patients had unstable coronary syndromes.
Main outcome measures—Death, cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), and repeat angioplasty (PTCA).
Results—The angiographic success rate was 100% and the clinical procedural success rate 93%. The mean (SD) follow up was 11.9 (7.2) months (range 2-32). The mean (SD) number of stents per patient was 2.4 (0.7). The mean (SD) number of lesions treated per patient was 1.4 (0.6). There were four in-hospital deaths (2.9%) and five patients (3.6%) had an MI before hospital discharge. All in-hospital deaths occurred in patients presenting with an acute MI and cardiogenic shock. Three patients (2.2%) had a late MI. One patient with stent thrombosis underwent emergency CABG. Three patients (2.2%) underwent late CABG. Eight patients (5.7%) had a repeat PTCA. Eighty three patients (61.5%) were asymptomatic at follow up and 121 (86.4%) were free from major clinical events.
Conclusion—In an era of increased operator experience, high pressure stent deployment, and reduced anticoagulation with antiplatelet treatment alone, multiple coronary stenting may be performed with a high procedural success rate and good intermediate term outcome.

Keywords: angioplasty;  stents;  clinical outcome;  interventional cardiology     

Results (>6 months) of stenting of >1 major coronary artery in multivessel coronary artery disease.

Multivessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) is associated with a high requirement for further revascularization procedures. Although stenting can reduce restenosis and clinical events after 1-vessel intervention, little information is available after multivessel coronary stenting. We followed up 136 patients (9% of 1,481 undergoing stenting in our center) who had had stent implantation in at least 2 different major native coronary arteries and were followed-up for >6 months. Each patient had received a mean of 2.3 +/- 0.6 stents (1.13 +/- 0.4 stents per lesion) and procedural success was 95%. In-hospital complications included 1 death, 1 Q-wave infarction, 5 non-Q-wave myocardial infarctions, and 1 repeat PTCA. After a mean of 18 +/- 13 months, 7 patients died (3 of heart failure, 4 of noncardiac causes), 2 required coronary bypass surgery, 1 had a myocardial infarction, 13 target vessel repeat PTCA, and 4 non-target vessel PTCA. Survival free of major cardiac events was 75% at 3 years. A history of heart failure, dilation of a restenotic lesion, and 3-vessel dilation were independent negative predictors of event-free survival. Angiographic follow-up was available in 86 patients: 56 (65%) were restenosis free, 23 (27%) had 1-vessel restenosis, and 6 (7%) had 2-vessel and 1 patient 3-vessel restenosis. Restenosis per vessel was 23% (41 of 177). Reference diameter, past-PTCA minimal luminal diameter, and length of the stent were independent predictors of restenosis. We conclude that multivessel stenting provides good midterm results in selected patients with multivessel coronary artery disease. Midterm events are less frequent than previously reported after balloon PTCA.