Effects of water-storage on the physical and ultramorphological features of adhesives and primer/adhesive mixtures

The aims of this study were to evaluate the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and elastic modulus (E) of adhesives, and primer/adhesive mixtures after aging for 6 months in water or oil; and to compare silver uptake patterns under the TEM. A one-step self-etching adhesive (One-up Bond F: OB), two two-step self-etching primers (SE Bond: SE and Protect Bond: CP), and two etch-and-rinse systems (Single Bond: SB and Prime&Bond NT: PB) were used. Bonding and primer solutions of self-etching systems were also mixed (SE+P and CP+P). Most adhesives presented decreased UTS after water-storage. Similar or increased UTS was observed after oil storage. Except for SB, E values did not change after water-storage, but they increased after storage in oil. OB, CP+P and SE+P presented more silver uptake. The effects of water-storage were material-dependent, and significantly affected the mechanical properties and silver uptake patterns of adhesives.     

Long-term TEM analysis of the nanoleakage patterns in resin-dentin interfaces produced by different bonding strategies.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of etch-and-rinse and self-etching adhesive systems to prevent time- and water-induced nanoleakage in resin-dentin interfaces over a 6-month storage period. METHODS: Five commercial adhesives were tested, which comprise three different strategies of bonding resins to tooth hard tissues: one single-step self-etching adhesive (One-up Bond F (OB), Tokuyama); two two-step self-etching primers (Clearfil SE Bond (SE) and an antibacterial fluoride-containing system, Clearfil Protect Bond (CP), Kuraray Inc.); two two-step etch-and-rinse adhesives (Single Bond (SB), 3M ESPE and Prime&Bond NT (PB), Dentsply). Restored teeth were sectioned into 0.9 mm thick slabs and stored in water or mineral oil for 24 h, 3 or 6 months. A silver tracer solution was used to reveal nanometer-sized water-filled spaces and changes that occurred over time within resin-dentin interfaces. Characterization of interfaces was performed with the TEM. RESULTS: The two two-step self-etching primers showed little silver uptake during the 6-month experiment. Etch-and-rinse adhesives exhibited silver deposits predominantly within the hybrid layer (HL), which significantly increased for SB after water-storage. The one-step self-etching adhesive OB presented massive silver accumulation within the HL and water-trees protruding into the adhesive layer, which increased in size and quantity after water-storage. After storage in oil, reduced silver deposition was observed at the interfaces for all groups. SIGNIFICANCE: Different levels of water-induced nanoleakage were observed for the different bonding strategies. The two-step self-etching primers, especially the antibacterial fluoride-containing system CP, showed the least nanoleakage after 6 months of storage in water.     

Physiochemical interactions at the interfaces between self-etch adhesive systems and dentine

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to provide direct and comprehensive information regarding morphology, quality and chemistry of the interfaces between three self-etching primers/adhesives and dentine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The occlusal one-third of the crown was removed from 18 unerupted human third molars. The prepared dentine surfaces were randomly selected for treatment with one of three commercial self-etching bonding agents according to manufacturers' instructions. One two-step self-etching adhesive (Clearfil SE Bond) and two one-step self-etching adhesives (One-Up Bond F and Prompt L-Pop) were selected. Five-micron-thick sections of adhesive/dentine interface specimens were cut and stained with Goldner's trichrome for light microscopy. Companion slabs were analysed with micro-Raman spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). RESULTS: It was shown that the difference in aggressiveness of these three contemporary self-etching systems produced different thickness of hybrid layer. Staining technique showed a distinct coloured line/zone at the adhesive/dentine interfaces for all three bonding systems. The width of this line varied, and was approximately 1, 1-2, 2-3 microm for Clearfil SE Bond, One-Up Bond F and Prompt L-Pop, respectively. The colour differences in the stained interface sections, which is reflected by the extent to which the adhesive encapsulates the demineralised dentine matrix, indicated that collagen fibrils at the interfaces were not totally encased in all three self-etching adhesives. Raman results showed that Prompt L-Pop is the most aggressive systems in this study. It almost totally demineralised the 2-microm deep subsurface dentine, while Clearfil SE is mild, only partially demineralised the first micron deep dentine. CONCLUSIONS: The complementary techniques, i.e. SEM, staining and micro-Raman spectroscopy, hold considerable promise for comprehensive physicochemical characterisation of self-etching adhesive/dentine interfaces. In comparison with two-step self-etching system, the aggressive one-step system produces more complex interfaces.     

Morphological categorization of acid-base resistant zones with self-etching primer adhesive systems

This study investigated the influence of the composition of self-etching primer adhesive systems on the morphology of acid-base resistant zones (ABRZs). One-step self-etching primer systems (Clearfil Tri-S Bond, G-Bond, and One-Up Bond F Plus) and two-step self-etching primer systems (Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil Protect Bond, UniFil Bond, and Mac Bond II) were used in this study. Each adhesive was applied on prepared dentin disk surfaces, and a resin composite was placed between two dentin disks. All resin-bonded specimens were subjected to acid-base challenge. Observation under a scanning electron microscope (SEM) revealed the creation of an ABRZ adjacent to the hybrid layer for all the self-etch primer adhesive systems, even when non-fluoride releasing adhesives were used. The presence of fluoride in two-step self-etching adhesive significantly increased the thickness of ABRZ created. Results suggested that an ABRZ was created with the use of self-etching primer adhesive systems, but its morphology differed between one-and two-step self-etching primer adhesive systems and was influenced by fluoride release activity.     

Resin-enamel bonds made with self-etching primers on ground enamel

Self-etching primer adhesives have recently been introduced to simplify bonding. However, the fundamental bonding mechanism of self-etching primers to enamel is not yet fully understood. This study aimed to investigate resin-enamel bonds of self-etching primer adhesives on ground enamel. Two self-etching primer adhesives (Clearfil Liner Bond 2 V and Clearfil SE Bond) were used in this study. A total-etch adhesive (One-Step) was used as a control. Resin-enamel beams were subjected to the microtensile bond test. Subsequently, the failure modes of all specimens were quantified using image analysis. Undemineralized and demineralized ultrathin sections of the resin-enamel bonded specimens were examined using transmission electron microscopy. The bond strengths of Clearfil SE Bond (39.8 +/- 11.9 MPa) and One-Step (46.2 +/- 12.7 MPa) were significantly greater than that of Clearfil Liner Bond 2V (30.4 +/- 6.2 MPa). Scanning electron microscopy of the fractured surfaces revealed the failure direction and weakest portion within each bond. Transmission electron microscopy showed a thin hybridized complex of resin in enamel produced by the self-etching primers without the usual micrometer-sized resin tags seen in resin-enamel bonds produced using the total-etch adhesive. The morphological features of the resin-enamel bonds produced by two self-etching primers tested were different from that created with the total-etch adhesive.     

不同自酸蚀黏结系统对窝沟封闭剂黏结强度的实验研究

目的:评价不同自酸蚀黏结系统对窝沟封闭剂剪切黏结强度的影响.方法:将24颗正畸拔除的前磨牙随机分为4组,以1种两步法自酸蚀黏结剂Clearfil SE Bond(A组)和3种一步法自酸蚀黏结剂XenoⅢ(B组),Adper Prompt(C组),Tokuyama Bond Force(D组)分别与3M Concise窝...     

一步法自酸蚀粘接剂微拉伸粘接强度的研究

目的评价一步法白酸蚀粘接剂的牙本质微拉伸粘接强度，观察并分析样本断裂类型。方法选择新拔除的人无龋下颌第三磨牙12颗，分别用3种一步法、1种两步法的白酸蚀粘接剂进行牙本质粘接。用微拉伸测力仪测试粘接强度，并用体视显微镜和扫描电镜观察样本断裂类型。结果3种一步法白酸蚀粘接剂的微拉伸强度分别为：材料A（Adper Prompt）（23．36±2．55）MPa；材料B（Clearfil S^3 Bond）（30．46±3．82）MPa；材料C（Xenon Ⅲ）（34．59±3．46）MPa；1种两步法自酸蚀粘接剂材料D（Clearfil SE Bond）的微拉伸粘接强度为（45．06±5．29）MPa。材料D微拉伸粘接强度最高，与其他3组相比，差异具有统计学意义（P〈0．01）。样本断裂均发生于粘接界面，未观察到复合树脂或牙本质内聚破坏。结论一步法白酸蚀粘接剂的牙本质粘接强度低于两步法白酸蚀粘接剂，但多数仍可满足临床对树脂粘接强度的要求。     

��������ʴճ�Ӽ���ճ��ǿ���;���ʵ���о�

??Objective    To evaluate the bonding performance of four commercial available self-etching systems by micro-tensile bond strength test. Methods    Four self-etching adhesives were included in this study?? Easy Bond ??EB??3M ESPE?? USA???? G-Bond plus ??GBp?? GC Corporation?? Japan???? Clearfil Mega Bond ??MB?? Kuraray Medical INC?? Japan?? and Clearfil Protect Bond ??PB?? Kuraray Medical INC?? Japan??. Eighty human third molars without caries were separated into 20 groups with 4 teeth in each group for different water-storage durations. After bonding by following the manufacturer’s instruction?? the teeth were built-up with resin composite ??Clearfil AP-X?? and being stored in 37 ?? distilled water for 24 hours?? 3 months?? 6 months?? 12 months and 24 months. The bonded specimens were sectioned into 1.0 mm2 sticks for the micro-tensile bond strength ??μTBS?? test. The obtained data were expressed as MPa and statistically analyzed by Games-Howell test ??P??0.05??. Results    Of all-in-one adhesives?? EB and GBp showed significant decrease after 24 months of water storage in comparison with 24 hours. On the other hand?? two-step self-etching systems expressed no statistical decrease in μTBS after 24 months water-storage compared with that of 24 hours. Conclusion    After 24hours?? the bonding performance of HEMA-contained all-in-one system is better than that of HEMA-free all-in-one system. On the other hand?? two-step self-etching systems might have consistent bonding performance compared with that of all-in-one systems in long-time durability test.     

四种自酸蚀粘接剂的粘接强度耐久性实验研究

目的    评价4种自酸蚀粘接剂的粘接强度耐久性。方法    选择2012年1—6月就诊于中国医科大学附属口腔医院口腔外科的患者因非龋源性原因拔除的无龋第三磨牙80颗,采用石膏打磨机去除牙釉质以充分暴露牙本质,600目砂纸在水环境中研磨去除表面玷污层。采用随机抽签的原则,每4颗牙为一组,共分为20组,在其表面分别涂布4种临床上使用的自酸蚀粘接剂［Easy Bond（EB）、G-Bond plus（GBp）、Clearfil Mega Bond（MB）、Clearfil Protect Bond（PB）］。每种粘接剂分为5组对应各个时间点（24 h、3个月、6个月、12个月和24个月）。粘接剂的使用严格按照各自产品说明书进行操作。之后,在其表面堆砌约5 mm厚的复合树脂。将其置于无菌双蒸水中保存在37℃恒温箱内,分别于24 h和3、6、12、24个月后将其切割成截面为1.0 mm2的长柱状后进行微拉伸测试,比较4种粘接剂在不同时间点的粘接强度耐久性。结果    一步自酸蚀粘接剂EB和GBp在24个月后的粘接强度较24 h的粘接强度显著降低（P < 0.05）。二步自酸蚀粘接剂MB和PB在24个月后的粘接强度与24 h的相比差异无统计学意义（P > 0.05）。结论    含有亲水性成分甲基丙烯酸羟乙酯（HEMA）的一步自酸蚀粘接剂24 h后的粘接力强于不含HEMA的粘接剂。与一步自酸蚀粘接剂相比,二步自酸蚀粘接剂在耐久性测试中表现更为稳定。     

Bond strengths of one- and two-step self-etch adhesive systems

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: One-bottle self-etching adhesives have been introduced that combine the etchant, primer, and adhesive into a single bottle in an effort to reduce the number of bonding steps. Limited research has been conducted comparing the efficacy of 1-bottle and 2-bottle self-etching adhesives. PURPOSE: This investigation evaluated the microtensile bond strength (MTBS) of 3 one-step self-etching adhesives, 2 two-step self-etching adhesives, and a total-etch adhesive. A secondary objective was to evaluate the effect of an intermediary layer of elastic resin on the MTBS of 2 of the self-etching adhesives. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The MTBS of 3 one-step self-etching adhesives (G-Bond, iBond, and Clearfil S(3)), 2 two-step self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE and Optibond Solo Plus Self-Etch), and a total-etch adhesive (Prime & Bond NT) was evaluated. Microtensile bond strength (MPa) was determined using composite resin (Herculite XRV) cylinders bonded to the dentin surface of human third molars (n=24) using 6 bonding agents. Each bonded tooth specimen was longitudinally sectioned to produce bar-shaped specimens with a square cross-sectional nominal bond area of 1.4 mm(2) (n=20). Bonded specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C +/- 2 degrees C for 72 hours, during which time they were subjected to thermal cycling (1500 cycles, in water baths of 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C, for a dwell time of 30 seconds). Testing was performed on a universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. One-way ANOVA, Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsh multiple range test, and Wald chi square test, each using an overall alpha=.05, were performed on all data. Low-power (x20) microscopic examination of the bond failure was observed for each specimen. RESULTS: The 1-way ANOVA (P<.001) and Ryan-Einot-Gabriel-Welsh multiple range test (P<.05) showed significant differences between the mean MTBS values for several of the bonding agents tested. The Wald chi square test of the Weibull distribution showed significant differences between adhesives (P<.001). CONCLUSION: Of the bonding agents tested, significantly higher MTBS was obtained with the total-etch 2-stage adhesive. The results of this study suggest that there are similar bond strengths between the 1- and 2-bottle self-etch adhesives.     

Effect of two-step adhesive systems on inhibition of secondary caries around fluoride-releasing resin composite restorations in root dentine

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of two-step adhesive systems on secondary caries inhibition around fluoride-releasing materials in vitro. METHODS: Two self-etching primer systems, Clearfil SE Bond (SE) and UniFil Bond (UB), and two one-bottle systems with a total-etch wet-bonding technique, Single Bond (SB) and One-Step (OS), were used prior to placement of resin composites either with (Reactmer) or without (Z100) fluoride release. Class V cavities prepared in extracted human premolars were restored with various combinations of materials: Reactmer/SE, Reactmer/UB, Reactmer/SB, Reactmer/OS, Z100/SE, Z100/UB, Z100/SB and Z100/OS. After storage for 14 days, the restored teeth were incubated in bacterial medium containing sucrose with Streptoccus mutans for 2 weeks. Water sorption and desorption of the adhesives and fluoride release from the resins either coated with adhesive or uncoated were also determined. RESULTS: The one-bottle groups showed higher water sorption and desorption than the self-etching primer groups. Although fluoride release from the Reactmer specimens was suppressed by the adhesive coating, the one-bottle groups allowed significantly higher fluoride release than the self-etching primer groups. On microradiographs, the radio-opaque layers adjacent to the Reactmer restorations were thick and clear, while the layers adjacent to the Z100 restorations were thin and unclear. For the Reactmer restorations, the radio-opaque layers associated with the one-bottle groups were significantly thicker than for the self-etching primer groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicated that the use of one-bottle wet-bonding systems for bonding of fluoride-releasing resin composites to dentine may contribute to inhibit secondary caries compared to self-etching primer systems.     

pH changes of self-etching primers mixed with powdered dentine

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the pH changes of self-etching primers mixed with dentine powder. METHODS: Four self-etching primer adhesive systems were used: Clearfil SE Bond, Imperva Fluoro Bond, Mac Bond II, and Unifil Bond. Dentine discs obtained from extracted bovine incisors were milled and pulverized into a fine powder. The dentine powder was then mixed with solutions of self-etching primers diluted with distilled water. The pH changes of the primer-dentine powder mixtures were measured by a solid-state pH sensor connected to a pH meter at time points 10, 20, 30, 60, 120, 180, 300, and 600 s after the start of mixing. Data were analyzed by the Tukey HSD test and the Dunnett test at a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The baseline pH values of the self-etching primers ranged from 1.83 to 2.34, with Mac Bond II exhibiting a significantly lower value than the other three products. After mixing with the dentine powder, the pH values significantly increased, ranging from 6.95 to 7.37 at 600 s after mixing; there were no significant differences in these values among the self-etching primers used. An insoluble precipitate was formed in the case of Clearfil SE Bond, indicating a chemical reaction between the functional monomer and the dentine powder. CONCLUSIONS: The dentine has a strong buffering capacity against the acidity of self-etching primers.     

Bonding to enamel and dentin using self-etching adhesive systems.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the effectiveness of three different dentin adhesive systems on the adhesion of resin composite to both dentin and enamel. METHOD AND MATERIALS: The flat dentin and enamel surfaces of 60 extracted human molar teeth were exposed by wet grinding with 600-grit silicon carbide paper. One total-etch self-priming adhesive system (Prime & Bond NT), one two-step self-etching primer adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond), and one "all-in-one" self-etching adhesive system (Prompt L-Pop) were evaluated. Each bonding system was applied according to the manufacturer's instructions and followed by composite (TPH Spectrum) application. Twenty-four hours after bonding, the teeth were subjected to shear testing. There were 10 replicates for each group. RESULTS: Prompt L-Pop exhibited significantly higher bond strength values to enamel (27 +/- 4.2 MPa) than all other groups. There were no statistically significant differences for shear bond strength to dentin among adhesives. Prompt L-Pop showed the statistically significantly higher bond strength to enamel than dentin. There were no statistically significant differences between the enamel and dentin bond strengths of Clearfil SE Bond and Prime & Bond NT. CONCLUSIONS: The self-etching adhesive systems produced high bond strengths to human coronal dentin and ground enamel surfaces. These materials seem to be very promising for further clinical applications, and the results are very encouraging for the clinical success of these simplified adhesive systems. The self-etching adhesive systems produced even better bond strengths to both enamel and dentin than conventional total-etch systems, especially the "all-in-one" system, which produced the highest bond strength to enamel.     

Bond strength of different adhesive systems to dental hard tissues

This study compared the shear bond strengths of different adhesive systems to enamel and dentin of different depths. The adhesive systems used were: Single Bond one-bottle total-etch; AQ Bond one-step self-etching, Clearfil SE Bond two-step self-etching and Tyrian SPE/One-step Plus two-step self-etching. Eighty extracted non-carious human mandibular molars were mounted in self-curing resin and the occlusal surfaces were ground with a mechanical grinder to obtain flat occlusal enamel surfaces. After applying the adhesive systems, a plastic tube was attached to the enamel surfaces. The tube was filled with a universal hybrid resin composite, which was then polymerized. The specimens were stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. Shear bond testing was carried out using an Instron Universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The occlusal enamel of the 80 teeth was removed to determine the bond strengths of the adhesives to superficial dentin. To obtain deep dentin, the same teeth were ground deep towards the pulp, with the remaining dentin thickness approximately 0.7 mm. The adhesives and restorative material were then applied to the prepared dentin surfaces following the methodology described above. For occlusal enamel surfaces, the bond strength of Single Bond was significantly higher than the other adhesives. Single Bond, Clearfil SE Bond and Tyrian SPE/One-step Plus performed equally when bonded to superficial dentin; the lowest bond strength was obtained with AQ Bond. On deep dentin, the highest bond strengths were obtained with Clearfil SE Bond. For each adhesive system, shear bond strength to enamel was statistically higher than it was to either superficial or deep dentin. There were no significant differences between shear bond strengths to superficial versus deep dentin, regardless of adhesive.     

Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application

PURPOSE: To evaluate the immediate microtensile bond strengths achieved with representative adhesive systems from each of the four current bonding approaches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Resin composite was bonded incrementally to flat, midcoronal dentin from 33 human molars, using the adhesives (Adper Scotchbond MP; Adper Scotchbond 1; Optibond Solo Plus; Clearfil SE Bond; AdheSE; Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus; Optibond Solo Plus self-etching; One-Up Bond F; iBond; Adper Prompt L-Pop; Xeno III) according to the respective manufacturer's instructions. The bonded specimens were immediately sectioned into sticks and underwent microtensile bond testing either immediately or after 24 h. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and LSD tests. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between immediate and 24-h bond strengths (p > 0.05). However, significant differences were observed among adhesives (p = 0.001). The all-in-one adhesive iBond showed statistically lower values when compared to all the other adhesives. Adper Prompt L-Pop, Xeno III, Tyrian SPE + One Step Plus and One-Up Bond F, all self-etching adhesives, were significantly weaker than AdheSE, Optibond Solo Plus, Adper Scotchbond 1, Optibond Solo Plus self-etching, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Scotchbond MP, which did not differ statistically from each other. CONCLUSION: Microtensile bond strengths of representative adhesive systems from the four categories of bonding agents were not equivalent, with the lowest values recorded for the one-step self-etching adhesives. There were no differences in the bond strengths when measured immediately and after 24 h.     

五种牙本质粘结系统微拉伸强度的比较

目的比较不同类型自酸蚀牙本质粘结系统的粘结强度,为临床应用提供参考。方法选择4种自酸蚀粘结系统Clearfil S3Bond,i Bond,Clearfil SE Bond,XenoⅢ,1种全酸蚀粘结系统Single Bond2,用微拉伸法测试这些粘结系统的粘结强度并进行比较。结果全酸蚀粘结剂Single Bond2的微拉伸强度最高,与自酸蚀粘结剂粘结强度有显著差异（P〈0.05）。自酸蚀粘结剂i Bond,S3Bond,XenoⅢ两两之间粘结强度无显著差异（P〉0.05）。SE Bond的粘结强度显著高于i Bond,S3Bond和XenoⅢ（P〈0.05）。结论第五代牙本质粘结剂具有较强的粘结强度,但第七代牙本质粘结剂临床操作更为方便。     

Effects of regional enamel and prism orientation on resin bonding

Human enamel, with its prismatic, rod-like apatitic morphology, is an anisotropic material. Because of this structural anisotropy, variation in enamel bonding sites might influence the bonding ability of current adhesive systems. This study investigated the effects of regional enamel and the direction of enamel sectioning on the bonding ability of two commercially available resin adhesives: a self-etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond) and a one-bottle adhesive system intended for use with a total-etch wet bonding technique (Single Bond). Two regions of enamel, cuspal and mid-coronal enamel, were chosen, then sectioned in three different directions, horizontally, axially and tangentially. Slices of the sectioned enamel were then bonded with each adhesive system and submitted to a micro-shear bond test. The results of a micro-shear bond testing showed that the bonding of a one-bottle adhesive system (Single Bond) to enamel was high at the surface perpendicular to the enamel prisms (40 MPa to 51 MPa) and low at the surface parallel to the enamel prisms (24 MPa to 27 MPa). In the case of a self-etching primer system (Clearfil SE Bond), 35 MPa to 45 MPa bond strengths were obtained from all surfaces. The bond strengths of the two adhesive systems were significantly influenced by the anisotropic structure of enamel (p < 0.05). However, the effect of a self-etching primer system was less influenced by the orientation of the prismatic structure of enamel than that of a one-bottle adhesive system (p < 0.05). SEM and CLSM microphotographs showed that the self-etching primer effectively modified the smear layer without being excessively destructive to the enamel.     

Polymerization efficacy of simplified adhesive systems studied by NMR and MRI techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the efficacy of polymerization of self-etching dental adhesives in different solvent evaporation conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four self-etching adhesive systems were studied. Two of them are classified as mild two-step self-etching adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond, Protect Bond) and the other two are strong one-step systems (Xeno III, ADP-Prompt-L-Pop). The influence of temperature and duration of the air-drying period on photo-polymerization was followed by: gravimetry, (1)H solid-state NMR spectroscopy and stray-field MRI. The evolution of proton magnetization with irradiation time was recorded and correlated with volumetric polymerization shrinkage and extent of reaction; evaporation and hardening effects were identified. RESULTS: Main variables determining water-solvent evaporation of the tested adhesives are: (1) water/HEMA relative concentration, (2) presence of photoinitiator compounds in the primer (SEB) and (3) presence of ethanol (XENO). SEB shows the highest extent of photo-polymerization of the tested adhesives. The lowest volumetric contraction was obtained for APLP and XENO and the attempt to remove the solvents did not increase the extent of polymerization significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Temperature increase following photo-polymerization reaction is dominant towards the effect of the drying step for solvent evaporation in self-etching systems. Attempts to remove the solvents did not increase the extent of polymerization, so other problems are impairing the polymerization of one-step adhesives. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of tested one-step adhesives is discouraged as the attained low extent of polymerization may lead to low bond strength, high susceptibility to degradation and also will favor a continuing etching effect on the underlying dentin.     

3种一步法自酸蚀粘接剂固化后的吸水性和溶解性

目的 比较3种市售的一步法自酸蚀粘接剂的吸水性及溶解性,为临床操作提供指导.方法 选择3种一步法自酸蚀粘接剂Adper Easy Bond (AEO)、Optibond All-in-one (OP)和BeautiBond (BB),各制备50个圆盘试件(直径为8.0mm,厚度为1.0mm),浸泡于去离子水中,并分组于不同浸泡时间段(1天、7天、30天、90天、180天),通过浸水前后质量变化测定其吸水值与溶解值.结果 在每个浸泡期,OP的吸水值、溶解值均为最高,AEO吸水值居中、溶解值最低,BB吸水值最低而溶解值居中,不同品牌粘接剂组间比较,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05);3种粘接剂的溶解值均随时间延长显著增加,不同浸泡时间组内比较,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05).结论 3种市售的一步法自酸蚀粘接剂固化后的吸水性和溶解性明显不同,可能与其组成有关.     

Comparison of enamel and dentin microshear bond strengths of a two-step self-etching priming system with five all-in-one systems

Data on the adhesive strength of new all-in-one adhesives are still relatively limited. This study compared the microshear bond strengths of five recent all-in-one self-etching priming systems (G-Bond, One-Up Bond-F Plus, Clearfil S3 Bond, Adper Prompt L-Pop and Go!) with a widely used two-step self-etching priming system (Clearfil SE Bond). Human molars were sectioned and finished with 600-grit SiC paper. Both enamel and dentin were bonded using adhesives with a 0.7 mm bonding diameter. Bond strengths were tested using a microshear bond test method at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The mean bond strengths and standard deviations were calculated and analyzed using ANOVA and the Tukey's HSD test. Results showed the two-step self-etching system had significantly higher bond strengths to dentin. However, for enamel bond strength, Clearfil SE Bond showed no statistical difference to G-Bond and Go!; however, all of the other materials were statistically lower. It is necessary to examine these new materials clinically to determine their efficacy.