Development of the Adult eating behavior evaluation questionnaire

Objective:To develop an adult eating behavior evalua- tion questionnaire,to evaluate the eating behavior of Chi- nese adult. Methods:Using stratified cluster sampling to get 1078 eligible subjects of different developing levels from the com- munities in Wuhan City and Yichang Country. Result:The reliability of the questionnaires is accept- able(Cronbachá=0.70,Split-half coefficient=0.69).11 major factors were extracted and matched basically the ques- tionnaire designed construct.The sum scores of the ques- tionnaire can distinguish the eating behavior of different age groups,gender groups,different family monthly in- come groups as well as different education level groups. The sum scores of the questionnaire and the most of sum scores of subscales are correlated with the daily nutriment intake. Conclusion::The reliability and validity of adult eating behavior evaluation questionnaire is acceptable.It is still needed to do more research about the theory model of eat- ing behavior to get more high quality eating behavior mea- surement tools.     

Performance of the WHO Rose angina questionnaire in post-menopausal women: Are all of the questions necessary?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of a shortened version of the Rose angina questionnaire focusing on exertional chest pain. METHODS: Cross sectional analysis of 3987 women aged 60 to 79 years from 23 British towns. The performances of definite Rose angina (using data from the full Rose angina questionnaire) and exertional chest pain (using data from a subset of three questions from the Rose angina questionnaire) were assessed against a medical record of angina. RESULTS: The sensitivity (the proportion with a medical record of angina who were identified as having angina by the questionnaire) was 29.9% (95% confidence intervals 25.7% to 34.4%) comparing definite Rose angina to any medical record of angina since 1978 and 50.7% (45.9% to 55.5%) comparing exertional chest pain to any medical record diagnosis of angina. The positive predictive values of both questionnaires were similar. When the two questionnaires were compared with a gold standard of a primary care consultation for angina symptoms within the past five years the sensitivity of definite Rose angina was 33.0% (26.9% to 39.6%) and that of exertional chest pain was 51.8% (45.1% to 58.5%). Although the sensitivity of both versions of the questionnaire was greater in those aged 60-69 years compared with those aged 70-79 years, it remained higher in the exertional chest pain version of the questionnaire than for definite Rose angina based on the full version of the questionnaire in both age groups. Performance of either version of the questionnaire was not affected by occupational social class. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to identifying women with a medical diagnosis of angina or those presenting to primary care with anginal symptoms, these results suggest that a shortened version of the Rose angina questionnaire focusing on exertional chest pain performs better than the full version. Other studies suggest that exertional chest pain is the crucial element of the Rose angina questionnaire with respect to predicting future coronary events. It is concluded that using a shortened version of the Rose angina questionnaire is adequate in epidemiological studies.     

Validity and reliability of the Arabic version of the child perceptions questionnaire for 8–10-year-old children

Quality of Life Research - To develop an Arabic version of the CPQ8–10 and test its validity and reliability for use among Arabic-speaking children. The 25-item professionally translated...     

Does length of questionnaire matter? A randomised trial of response rates to a mailed questionnaire

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether length of questionnaire affects response rates. METHODS: A quasi-randomised trial of women aged 70 years and over in a general practice in England. Three questionnaires of different lengths: a clinical questionnaire (four pages); the same questionnaire plus the EuroQol (five pages); the same questionnaire plus the SF-12 (seven pages). The impact of length on the proportion of returned questionnaires and item completion rates was assessed. RESULTS: In total, 847 questionnaires were mailed; response rates were 49%, 49% and 40% to the short, medium and long questionnaires, respectively. This difference was statistically significant when the short questionnaire was compared against the longest instrument (9% difference; 95% confidence interval (CI) of difference = 0.3% to 16.6%). Item completion rates for the clinical questionnaire did not differ. Respondents did not differ in age or self-reported health status between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the length of a questionnaire from five to seven pages reduces response rates from women aged 70 years and over. However, lengthening a questionnaire does not seem to affect the quality of responses to questions near the front of the questionnaire.     

Assessing the measurement invariance of the RCADS-25 questionnaire across gender and child–parent dyads in the presence of multilevel data

Quality of Life Research - This study aims to assess the measurement invariance of the short version of the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale (RCADS-25) across male and female adolescents...     

Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the effort–reward imbalance questionnaire: a study in a petrochemical company

Objective To evaluate the criterion validity, factorial validity, and internal consistency of Korean version of effort–reward imbalance (ERI) for the scales of effort, reward, and overcommitment as well as to examine the effect of psychosocial factors on physical and mental illness among petroleum refinery workers in South Korea. Methods The Korean version of ERI questionnaire was constructed using the translation and back-translation technique, and its psychometric properties were explored among 908 male workers in a large petroleum refinery in South Korea in 2002. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was used to test internal consistency. An exploratory factor analysis was conducted on all items of the instrument. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on each dimension of effort, reward and overcommitment. Physical and mental health was measured by self-rated health (SF-8). The lowest tertiles of the scores were defined as illness. Multiple logistic regression models were used to test the effect of job stress on the physical and mental health (criterion validity of ERI scales). Results The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for effort, reward, and overcommitment were 0.71, 0.86, and 0.75, respectively, indicating satisfactory internal consistency. Exploratory factor analysis found three latent factors, which closely corresponded to the theoretical structure of the ERI model. Acceptable construct validity was shown using confirmatory factor analysis. The highest tertile of effort–reward ratio was significantly associated with physical illness (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.7–3.6) and mental illness (OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.0–4.2), compared to lower tertiles. Overcommitment was significantly associated with mental illness, but not with physical illness. Conclusions These findings contribute to the validity and reliability of the Korean ERI questionnaire. Importantly, in the context of a rapid change in the labour market, the lack of reciprocity between efforts and rewards at work is strongly associated with self-rated physical and mental health.     

Development and relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire for the estimation of intake of retinol and β‐carotene

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire to classify individuals according to their intakes of retinol and β‐carotene. Food items for the questionnaire were selected both on the basis of their contribution to total population intake of retinol and β‐carotene and on the proportion of between‐person variation explained, which was as calculated from data of two study populations in the Netherlands. Thus, 15 products containing retinol and 15 products containing β‐carotene were selected. These contributed over 90% to the total intake and explained 99% of the variation of retinol and β‐carotene, respectively. The questionnaire was validated against a dietary history in a population of 82 women (aged 30–49 years). The time elapsed between the two interviews was (on average) 25 days. Spearman rank‐order correlation coefficients comparing the questionnaire with the dietary history were 054, 0.59, and 0.64 for retinol, β‐carotene, and total vitamin A, respectively. The proportion of exact agreement in the two extreme categories of vitamin A intake, based on quintiles, was 56%. The corresponding gross misclassification (from 1 extreme category into the opposite) was 3%. These data indicate that a very short questionnaire can classify subjects into categories according to their vitamin A intake.     

Can the job content questionnaire be used to assess structural and organizational properties of the work environment?

Objective  

The theory behind the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) presumes that the “objective” social environment is measurable via self-report inventories such as the JCQ. Hence, it is expected that workers in identical work will respond highly similar. However, since no studies have evaluated this basic assumption, we decided to investigate whether workers performing highly similar work also responded similarly to the JCQ.     

A reduced factor structure for the PROQOL–HIV questionnaire provided reliable indicators of health-related quality of life

ObjectivesTo identify a simplified factor structure for the PROQOL–human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) questionnaire to improve the measurement of the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of HIV-positive patients in clinical care and research settings.Study Design and SettingHRQL data were collected using the eight-dimension PROQOL-HIV questionnaire from 2,537 patients (VESPA2 study). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) validated a simpler four-factor structure and assessed measurement invariance (MI). Multigroup analysis assessed the effect of sex, age, and antiretroviral therapy (ART) on the resulting factor scores. Correlations with symptom and Short Form (SF)-12 self-reports assessed convergent validity.ResultsItem analysis, EFA, and CFAs confirmed the validity [comparative fit index (CFI), 0.948; root mean square error of approximation, 0.064] and reliability (α's ≥ 0.8) of four dimensions: physical health and symptoms, health concerns and mental distress, social and intimate relationships, and treatment-related impact. Strong MI was demonstrated across sex and age (decrease in CFI <0.01). A multiple-cause multiple-indicator model indicated that HRQL correlated as expected with sex, age, and the ART status. Correlations of HRQL, symptom reports, and SF-12 scores evidenced convergent validity criterion.ConclusionThe simplified factor structure and scoring scheme for PROQOL-HIV will allow clinicians to monitor with greater reliability the HRQL of patients in clinical care and research settings.     

Agreement between web-based and paper versions of a socio-demographic questionnaire in the NutriNet-Santé study

Objectives  

Web-based studies nowadays raise a major interest as they can improve all steps involved in observational studies. Our objective was to compare the web-based version of the NutriNet-Santé self-administered socio-demographic and economic questionnaire with the traditional paper version.     

Self-reports of health-care utilization: diary or questionnaire?

OBJECTIVES: The feasibility and convergent validity of a cost diary and a cost questionnaire was investigated. METHODS: Data were obtained as part of a cost-utility analysis alongside a multicenter clinical trial in patients with resectable rectal cancer. A sample of 107 patients from 30 hospitals was asked to keep a weekly diary during the first 3 months after surgery, and a monthly diary from 3 to 12 months after surgery. A second sample of seventy-two patients from twenty-eight hospitals in the trial received a questionnaire at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, referring to the previous 3 or 6 months. Format and items of the questions were similar and included a wide range of medical and nonmedical items and costs after hospitalization for surgery. RESULTS: Small differences were found with respect to nonresponse (range, 79 to 86 percent) and missing questions (range, 1 to 6 percent between the diary and questionnaire). For most estimates of volumes of care and of costs, the diary and questionnaire did not differ significantly. Total 3-month nonhospital costs were 1,860 Euros, 1,280 Euros, and 1,050 Euros in the diary sample and 1,860 Euros, 1,090 Euros, and 840 Euros in the questionnaire sample at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, respectively (p = .50). However, with respect to open questions, the diary sample tended to report significantly more care. CONCLUSIONS: For the assessment of health-care utilization in economic evaluations alongside clinical trials, a cost questionnaire with structured closed questions may replace a cost diary for recall periods up to 6 months.     

Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease patients with rapid cognitive decline in clinical practice: Interest of the Deco questionnaire

Background  

Patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) who deteriorate rapidly are likely to have a poorer prognosis. There is a clear need for a clinical assessment fool to defect, such a decline in newly diagnosed patients.     

Community-living older people’s interpretation of the Norwegian version of older people’s quality of life (OPQOL) questionnaire

The aim of this study is to investigate how community-living older people interpret the Norwegian version of Older People's Quality of Life (OPQOL) questionnaire. The original OPQOL questionnaire was translated based on guidelines for cross-cultural translation. The Three-Step Test-Interview instrument was adopted to investigate how community-living older people interpreted the questionnaire. Data were collected from 14 participants (72–89 years). The questionnaire was filled in under observation. Semi-structured interviews were then conducted to clarify the observational data and elicit the participants’ experiences and opinions. Lastly, data were analysed using a hermeneutic interpretation approach. Our findings indicate that most of the participants managed to complete the OPQOL questionnaire without problems. The data analysis resulted in four primary themes: relevance & applicability, formulation, consistency & accuracy and subjectivity. The questionnaire covered all aspects related to the participants’ quality of life. However, statements related to religion were found to be irrelevant to their quality of life. Most of the participants thought that religion, philosophy and culture should be separate rather than included in the same statement. The participants missed the option of ‘not applicable’ when the statements were irrelevant to them. The statements are formulated in both positive and negative ways, which was sometimes confusing to them. The participants perceived phases such as “around me” “local,” and “things” as ambiguous, and thus they raised concerns about whether the OPQOL questionnaire could capture consistent data regarding their quality of life. The results of this study pinpoint the issues that community-living older people faced when interpreting and answering the Norwegian version of OPQOL questionnaire. These issues were mostly caused by sociocultural differences. Our work provides an overview of the changes that must be made in the questionnaire in order to address these sociocultural differences while using the OPQOL questionnaire in the Norwegian context.     

How sharp is the short QuickDASH? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and function and specific joint conditions

Purpose  

To assess and compare content, validity, and specificity of the QuickDASH (Disability of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire) as compared to the full-length DASH and other instruments to give a recommendation for its use depending on a specific clinical situation.     

Adaptation and validation of the “tolerability and quality of life” (TOOL) questionnaire in Chinese bipolar patients

Background

It is well known that the antipsychotic drugs impact the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of the bipolar patients. The side effects had been assessed only from the doctors’ perspective and neglected the patients’ subjective feeling. The aim of the study is to validate the specific instrument “tolerability and quality of life” (TOOL) into Chinese to describe and grade the impact of antipsychotic drugs on HRQoL from patients’ view.

Methods

A psychometric study was conducted with euthymic bipolar disorder patients (N = 105) under antipsychotic treatment. The psychometric properties of the TOOL, including internal consistency, retest reliability, concurrent validity, content validity, discriminative validity, item analysis, confirmatory factor analysis and feasibility, were analyzed.

Results

The internal consistency and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were adequate (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.80 and ICC = 0.81). A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) validated the one-factor model. Significant Spearman’s rank correlations between the TOOL and both Bref QoL.BD (Brief version of Quality of Life in Bipolar Disorder) (r = ?0.33, P < 0.01) and UKU (Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser side effects scale) (r = 0.13, P < 0.05) were found.

Limitations

Small sample size and no specific self-report instrument in Chinese to evaluate the criterion validity.

Conclusions

TOOL appears to be a reliable and valid measure to assess the impact of adverse events of antipsychotic drugs on HRQoL from the patients’ perspective.

     

Validation of the EORTC QLQ-INFO 25 questionnaire in Lebanese cancer patients: Is ignorance a Bliss?

Introduction

Despite worldwide trends toward optimizing full disclosure of information (DOI), the prevailing belief that cancer diagnosis should be concealed from patients, for their own good, has endured for a substantial period of time in Middle Eastern communities.

Objectives

This study would assess the reliability of the Arabic translated version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-INFO 25). The study was also designed to quantify DOI to Lebanese cancer patients and determine patient satisfaction with this DOI. Moreover, we compared the differences in the level of information among groups based on clinical and biographical variables.

Methods

A sample of patients, being treated for a variety of malignancies, was prospectively evaluated. A physician interviewed patients using the Arabic version of the EORTC QLQ-INFO 25, on the day of hospitalization for chemotherapy, before treatment was administered.

Results

In total 201 patients were interviewed. The translated version of the EORTC QLQ-INFO 25 showed high reliability when assessed using Cronbach’s alpha coefficients for internal consistency with values scoring higher than 0.7 for all scales and the full questionnaire. There was a considerable lack of information provided to the participants with 38.8 % being unaware of their diagnosis and more than half being uninformed about the extent of their disease. Paradoxically, 86.5 % of patients expressed their satisfaction about the amount of information they received and 89.5 % believe the information provided was helpful. Further analysis showed no significant association between gender, marital status, cancer site and stage and the amount of information received. However, age and level of education were associated with DOI such as younger and more educated patients received more information. Older patients were also found to be the most satisfied with the information they received, despite having less access to information.

Conclusions

Although a high proportion of patients were not properly informed about their diagnosis, the overwhelming majority were satisfied with the amount of information they received and believed it was useful, reflecting the complexity of Middle Eastern cultural influences on cancer patients’ perspectives.

     

Cross-cultural validation and analysis of responsiveness of the QUALIOST<Superscript>®</Superscript>: QUAlity of Life questionnaire In OSTeoporosis

Background

The QUALIOST^® was designed for use with the SF-36 to measure established osteoporosis-specific quality of life (QoL). The reliability (internal consistency and test-retest) and validity of the questionnaire were established in a stand-alone psychometric validation study. The objective of this paper is to provide additional information on the instrument's responsiveness using clinical trial data, along with the reliability and validity of translated versions.

Methods

The Spinal Osteoporosis Therapeutic Intervention (SOTI) was an international clinical trial comparing strontium ranelate to placebo on the occurrence of new vertebral fracture in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. QoL was a secondary endpoint, assessed using the SF-36 and QUALIOST^® at baseline and every six months, with the main analysis at 3-year follow-up. Questionnaire acceptability, analysis of the hypothesised structure, internal consistency reliability and responsiveness to clinical change over time were assessed at the 3-year follow up.

Results

1592 patients from 11 countries completed at least one QoL questionnaire. The psychometric properties of the questionnaires were assessed on cross-sectional (N = 1486) and longitudinal (N = 1288) data. Item discriminant validity of the QUALIOST^® was excellent, as was item convergent validity, with 100% of item-scale correlations being above the 0.40 level. Internal consistency reliability was also extremely good, with high Cronbach's alpha scores above the 0.70 benchmark. Responsiveness results were consistent for all QUALIOST^® scores, indicating that greater decreases in QoL corresponded to greater numbers of fractures experienced. QUALIOST^® scores also differed according to the type of fracture suffered. This was demonstrated by increased effect sizes for more severe vertebral fractures (clinical vertebral and painful vertebral). In comparing responsiveness, the QUALIOST^® scores were generally more consistent than those of the SF-36. Most notably, the QUALIOST^® was more responsive with regard to painful vertebral fractures than the SF-36.

Conclusion

The QUALIOST^® is a reliable and valid tool for measuring QoL in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Being available in several validated language versions, it is ready to be used in a variety of settings, including international clinical trials.