A discursive exploration of nursing work in the hospital emergency setting

Emergency nurses apply specialist knowledge to the practice of emergency care. This paper discusses the ways in which three emergency nurses understand the nature of their care from their own frames of reference and experiences and presents some of the data collected in a larger study. Various discourses, which compete to inform emergency nurses' understandings of practice, are linked with the notion of nurses as subjects; that is, each discourse may inform, shape and constitute the practice of the nurse and, in turn, the ways in which the patient comes to be known and understood. I will examine the ways in which emergency nurses come to experience or position themselves vis-à-vis extant forms of knowledge of emergency care and the extent to which they articulate new or distinctive formulations of emergency care. This paper illuminates the commonalities that constitute the discourses of emergency nursing care, and also analyse nurses' language which demonstrates that within each discourse variations, contradictions and resistances exist. Emergency nursing care occurs in a context of a biomedical discourse that dominates, or tends to dominate, the work of the emergency setting and so to determine acceptable or possible practices. Nevertheless, nurses contest in various ways the 'truths' that they understand to underpin their practice. Challenges to biomedical discourses are revealed, to some extent, by drawing attention to specific situations and particular struggles encountered in emergency nurses' everyday practice.     

Re-defining nursing expertise in the United kingdom

There is now international recognition of the importance of practice expertise in modern and effective health services. The Expertise in Practice Project in the United Kingdom began in May 1998 and continued to 2004. It included nurses working in all four countries of the United Kingdom, and it covered clinical specialists from pediatrics to palliative care. The project added to the current understanding of what nursing practice expertise is, through the identification and verification of attributes and factors which enable expert practice. The proposed framework offers a language for sharing what constitutes practice expertise and offers insight into what occurs between the expert practitioner and the people that experience their care. The Expertise in Practice Project demonstrates that nurses affect change and facilitate performance and organizational development.     

A discursive exploration of the practices that shape and discipline nurses' responses to postoperative delirium

A discursive exploration of the practices that shape and discipline nurses' responses to postoperative delirium Although delirium is classified as a medical emergency, it is often not treated as such by health care providers. The aim of this study was to critically examine, through a poststructural, Foucauldian concept of discourse, the language practices and discourses that shape and discipline nurses' care of older adults with postoperative delirium (POD) with a purpose to question accepted nursing practice. The study was based on data collected from face-to-face, in-depth, personal interviews with six nurses who work on an acute postoperative patient care unit. Five analytic readings of the data identified two prominent discourses at work in nursing practice which influenced the care of patients with POD. These were identified as discourses of legitimacy/illegitimacy and discourses of nursing work. Through the process of poststructural analysis it became evident that one overriding discourse - the biomedical/scientific discourse - served to direct, legitimize and govern all other discourses. The findings of this study have implications for nursing knowledge and practice, length of hospital stay and improved patient outcomes. This study builds on previous work and is the first study to conduct a discourse analysis illuminating nurses' responses to POD through comparison with other acute medical emergencies from a poststructural perspective.     

Expert thinking in nursing practice: implications for supporting expertise

Abstract The complexity of the art of expert nursing practice is an elusive phenomenon, which is difficult to articulate in concrete terms that can be translated into achieving quality patient care outcomes. The present study describes the findings of two hermeneutic (interpretive) studies on expert thinking that captured the holistic practice of expert clinicians. The findings from these studies provide insight into how expert practice can be administratively supported. These findings also have strong implications for strategies to facilitate the development of expertise in practice. In order to provide holistic care, nurses must spend time with their patients so that the particularities and meaning inherent in each unique patient situation can be understood. The art of expert thinking is a temporal and ethical activity, which needs to be supported and cultivated in a changing health-care delivery system.     

Northern nursing practice in a primary health care setting

BACKGROUND: This paper explicates the nature of outpost nursing work, and/or the day-to-day realities of northern nursing practice in a primary health care setting in Canada. The study was carried out to systematically explore the work of nurses in an indigenous setting. Institutional ethnography, pioneered by Dorothy Smith was the methodology used to guide this research. The theoretical perspective of this methodology does not seek causes or links but intends to explicate visible practices. AIM: It is intended to explicate the social organization of specific discourses that inform work processes of nurses working in remote indigenous communities. METHODOLOGY: The data originated from various sources including spending 2 weeks in a northern remote community shadowing experienced nurses, taking field notes and audio taping interviews with these nurses. One of the two researchers was a northern practice nurse for many years and has had taught in an outpost nursing programme. As part of the process, texts were obtained from the site as data to be incorporated in the analysis. The lived experiences have added to the analytical understanding of the work of nurses in remote areas. Data uncovered documentary practices inherent to the work setting which were then analysed along with the transcribed interviews and field notes derived from the on-site visit. Identifying disjuncture in the discourse of northern nursing and the lived experience of the nurses in this study was central to the research process. RESULTS: The results indicated that the social organization of northern community nursing work required a broad generalist knowledge base for decision making to work effectively within this primary health care setting. The nurse as 'other' and the invisibility of nurses' work of building a trusting relationship with the community is not reflected in the discourse of northern nursing. Trust cannot be quantified or measured yet it is fundamental to working effectively with the community. CONCLUSION: The nurses in this study saw building trust to promote health and well-being in communities as very important, yet very difficult to achieve. The difficulty in part stems from the constraining, structural, administrative, historical, cultural and political contextual realities that have shaped northern community nursing.     

Understanding change in clinical nursing practice

The present paper employs a poststructural framework to explore the construction of change in clinical nursing practice, as portrayed in nursing literature. In it a critique of two specific bodies of literature is offered: that which deals with the 'abstract' conception of change (but which is heavily influenced by organizational discourses) and that which describes changes in the clinical setting of critical care nursing practice. It is argued that the discursive constitution of change that is revealed in this analysis disadvantages clinical nurses. Because the context in which change occurs is largely unacknowledged, clinical nursing practice, as experienced and understood by nurses, is also marginalized. Change in clinical practice is under-researched, and such inquiry should be undertaken from the perspective of nurses themselves, and requires an exploration of the discursive context of nursing work.     

Expertise or performance? Questioning the rhetoric of contemporary narrative use in nursing

BACKGROUND: In the early 1980s there emerged in nursing a self-conscious and well-articulated concern to articulate nursing's contribution to patient care. This has fostered the production of a large volume of practice narratives that today form the basis of professional self-understanding. First-person practice narratives are now widely used as the evidence base for nursing expertise, not only in their natural home, the world of interpretative research, but also in the bureaucratic-judicial domain of professional regulation, health care organizations, trades unions and professional associations. AIM: The aim of this paper is to question the use of individual narrative accounts of nursing practice as evidence of nursing expertise. METHOD: We examine the model, method, and continuing consequences of these discursive formations of practice. First, we present a methodological discussion of how personal narratives are produced by the interplay between discourse and subjectivity. Second, we explore clinical narratives of expertise in the work of Patricia Benner and others to uncover the common template for contemporary narrative. DISCUSSION: Narrative production in nursing has led to particular constructions, rather than free representations of practice. It is these particular constructions that we call into question. Rather than viewing these narratives as revelatory of nursing practice, we argue that they place a 'spotlight' on the individual actor - the nurse - with an absence of structural practice context. CONCLUSION: We make the case that treatment of these narratives as individual evidence of expertise fundamentally misunderstands their function and purpose, and reduces the constitution of nursing expertise to the performance of a palatable and highly desirable discourse for a nursing audience.     

How nurses’ use of language creates meaning about healthcare users and nursing practice

Nursing practice occurs in the context of conversations with healthcare users, other healthcare professionals, and healthcare institutions. This discussion paper draws on symbolic interactionism and Fairclough's method of critical discourse analysis to examine language that nurses use to describe the people in their care and their practice. We discuss how nurses’ use of language constructs meaning about healthcare users and their own work. Through language, nurses are articulating what they believe about healthcare users and nursing practice. We argue that the language nurses use can contribute to viewing their practice as tasks on bodies that must be accomplished efficiently and objectively within the biomedical model, rather than relational and person‐centered. Moreover, the language nurses use can perpetuate a sense of powerlessness within healthcare systems yet paradoxically they are in a position of power over healthcare users. Nurses’ compliance with the efficiency and biomedical model results in a lack of emphasis on the full breadth of nursing work, which could be enacted in relational rather than power‐laden practices. We conclude by positing that careful use of language among nurses in all settings is essential, if we are to begin to articulate what nursing is to ourselves and to others.     

The rise of practice development with/in reformed bureaucracy: discourse, power and the government of nursing

rudge t., holmes d. & perron a. (2011) Journal of Nursing Management 19, 837–844 The rise of practice development with/in reformed bureaucracy: discourse, power and the government of nursing Aim Using a neo-Foucauldian approach, a critique of texts explicitly dealing with the definitional work for practice development (PD) was undertaken. Background PD has been taken up by many organizations as a way of focusing on nurses’ practices to benefit patients and the organization. Evaluation Literature pertaining to the PD phenomenon was examined and the present study explores those texts accomplishing definitional work. The discourse corpus collected together articles in nursing journals, book chapters and textbooks. The corpus was analysed using the discourse analysis method. Key issues PD uses and manipulates its location in a network of managerialism, evidence-based nursing, safety and quality discourses in healthcare to verify (and confirm) its definition and its position as central to progress in nursing practice. Conclusion We argue that while PD is portrayed as ‘emancipatory’ and transforming, nurses bear the responsibility for the system and its failures in a web of intricate power relations. Implications for Nursing Management The present study offers a review of the PD ideology in nursing where a critical perspective has yet to be found. Nursing managers should understand that PD is not a panacea for improving patient care.     

Drawing a qualitative distinction of caring practices in a professional context: the case of Chinese nursing

How to draw a qualitative distinction between nursing work and the work of a servant has been a major concern for nurses in China. This article explains the ways in which nurses in China articulate the meaning of caring in practice situations. Seventy nurses in Beijing were invited to share their experience about what caring meant to them as nurses and examples of caring in practice situations. Van Kaam's phenomenologic method of controlled explication was used to analyze the data. The findings reveal that these Chinese nurses are able to articulate the cheng and jing versions of caring practices that emphasize flexible, pluralist, contextualized, individualized, and subjectively informed practices. To further this study, we would suggest nurses be more proactive in starting a dialogue with society so as to seek nursing's legitimate practice that can foster responsive care to patients and society on the one hand and the professional integrity of nursing on the other.     

A & E nurses' constructs on the nature of nursing expertise: a repertory grid technique

The concept of nursing expertise has been the focus of considerable debate since the early 1980s, yet an agreed definition of the concept and the precise criteria by which it can be evaluated remains elusive. This paper will describe an exploratory study into A & E nurses' constructs of the nature of nursing expertise.Seven first level Accident and Emergency (A & E) nurses were interviewed using Kelly's Repertory Grid Technique. Each was asked to provide examples of nurses with whom they are working or have worked, to match eight given examples designed to represent varying levels of clinical expertise. The informants were asked to consider in what way two of their chosen examples were alike and differed from a third in their clinical practice.A total of 55 bi-polar constructs emerged which were clustered under four main headings. These suggested that A & E nurses perceived expert practice to be characterized by a high level of empirical knowledge, supportive team building, assertive clinical leadership and patient-focused involvement.     

Cultural competency and nursing care: an Australian perspective

AIMS: To propose a process that will facilitate cultural competence in Australian nursing practice. BACKGROUND: Cultural diversity is a prominent feature of the Australian health system and is impacting significantly on nursing care quality. A fictitious, but typical clinical exemplar is profiled that identifies cultural insensitivity in care practices leading to poor quality outcomes for the health consumer and her family. Strategies are proposed that will reverse this practice and promote culturally competent nursing care and that locates overseas qualified nurses in this process. CONCLUSION: This paper contributes to nursing care quality internationally by articulating strategies to achieve cultural competence in practice. Nurses must pay attention to interpersonal relationships and develop respect for the health consumer's value systems and ways of being, in order to protect their rights and avoid the tendency to stereotype individuals from particular cultures. The expertise of qualified nurses from different cultures can greatly assist this process.     

Developments in nursing in Ireland: the emergence of a disciplinary discourse.

This article presents a conceptualization of nursing as it is presently being constructed in Ireland. Official discourses on nursing are explored and the ways in which these discourses have been further shaped through consultation is highlighted. This is further supported by reference to research examining practicing nurses' discourses. There is some evidence to suggest that Irish nurses may be beginning to internalize many of the nursing concepts articulated at an international and national level over the past 20 years. However, barriers to actualization in practice are identified. Emerging discourses in Ireland suggest the conceptualization of nursing as promoting and maintaining health with nurses as coordinators of care who also engage in the development of therapeutic relationships with patients. The interpersonal aspect of nursing is considered central to the nursing role.     

Critical thinking and intuitive nursing practice

In this paper, we analyse how critical thinking and intuitive practice are related to expertise in nursing We examine how intuitive practice, when performed automatically without care, vigilance, and criticism, can result in prejudice and patterns of practice which are misinformed We will show that the student nurse develops intuitive, skilful performance in nursing by reasoning about nursing knowledge and applying reflective, critical thought m practice situations, thereby gaming increasing expertise in reasoning as a reliable professional ensuring quality client care The elements of thought necessary for sound reasoning in clinical practice will be explored Finally, we suggest educational strategies and tactics which promote the development of the intellectual capacities of student nurses as independent critical thinkers     

Understanding experience in nursing

Background. This paper reviews research that considered the life stories of experienced nurses and the relationships between life experience, the way in which people find meaning in their experience(s), the development of nursing knowledge, and the influence of these events and understandings on the characteristics and clinical practice of experienced nurses. Aims and objectives. The dominant perspectives in nursing about the place of experience in the development of nurses’ practice are considered and the paper argues for a broader understanding of experience; placing experience within the context of nurses’ lives, connection with others and their individual understandings about nursing care. Relevance to clinical practice. The place of experience in the development of nurses has not been well understood although the nursing discourse continues to value clinical experience highly. Becoming experienced as a nurse is described as a progressive and continuous interaction between experience, meaning and the lived world resulting in a personal and unique understanding of practice. The culture and discourse of nursing have tended to exclude or dampen individual difference and the paper considers a more expansive understanding of the place of experience and individual difference in nursing and the relevance of this perspective for the education of nurses.     

Examining the impending gap in clinical nursing expertise

Much has been written about current and future nursing shortages and the numerical gap between nurses available and projected nursing needs. Very little analysis has focused on the implications of the pending expertise gap within the nursing workforce. A graying and retiring registered nurse workforce will greatly increase the proportion of novice nurses with minimal experience in bedside practice. The expertise gap will also affect nursing education. This article explores the implications of these phenomena. Without careful planning, efforts to address the numerical shortage may inadvertently worsen the expertise gap, contributing to unsafe care and affecting nursing retention.     

Negotiated care: a model for nursing work in the renal setting

AIM: This article outlines a model for the nursing role in the chronic health care context of renal replacement therapy. METHODS: Materials from several streams of literature are used to conceptualize the potential for nursing work in the renal setting as negotiated care. In order to present the role of the renal nurse in this way it is contextualized by viewing the renal setting as a specialized social context constituted by a dominant professional discourse and a contrasting client discourse. DISCUSSION: While performing specific therapeutic activities in accord with the dominant discourse, renal nurses can develop a relationship with the person living on dialysis, based on responsiveness to their subjective experience reflecting the renal client discourse. In contrast to the language of noncompliance prevalent in the renal setting, nurses can, through their relationship with renal clients, facilitate their attempts to negotiate the requirements of the therapeutic regime into their own personal life situation. Nurses can mediate between the dominant and client discourses for the person living on dialysis. Care describes the quality that nurses actively seek to create in their relationships with clients, through negotiation, in order to support them to live as fully as possible while using renal replacement therapy. CONCLUSION: Within chronic health care contexts, shaped by the acute curative paradigm of biomedicine, the model of nursing work as negotiated care has the potential to humanize contemporary medical technologies by responding to clients' experiences of illness and therapy.     

Increased unintended patient harm in nursing practise as a consequence of the dominance of economic discourses

Caring is characterized by close and fragile relations between nurses and patients. At times, even with good intentions, nurses cause unintended harm of patients. We argue that the dominance of economic discourses in health care and their subsequent influence on service delivery and health care practices has the potential to increase unintended patient harm. Similar techniques and practices can result in either desired outcomes or harmful outcomes. We explore the notion of unintended harm and some of the ways it arises in nursing practice. We argue there is a clear link between the dominance of economic discourses and an increased risk of unintended harm. As a consequence of the dominance of economic rationalist discourses and the subsequent systems of control introduced, the practice of nursing has been significantly influenced. The challenge for nurses and the nursing profession is to develop strategies to refuse to give in to the dominance of economic interests over the need to prevent harm.     

Defining the expert ICU nurse.

This paper explores the concept of expertise in intensive care nursing practice from the perspective of its relationship to the current driving forces in healthcare. It discusses the potential barriers to acceptance of nursing expertise in a climate in which quantification of value and cost containment run high on agendas. It argues that nursing expertise which focuses on the provision of individualised, holistic care and which is based largely on intuitive decision-making cannot and should not be reduced to being articulated in positivist terms. The principles of abduction or fuzzy logic, derived from computer science, may be useful in assisting nurses to explain in terms, which others can comprehend, the value of nursing expertise.