"Subclinical" pacemaker syndrome: a randomised study of symptom free patients with ventricular demand (VVI) pacemakers upgraded to dual chamber devices.

OBJECTIVE--To determine whether symptom free patients with single chamber pacemakers benefit from dual chamber pacing. DESIGN--A randomised double blind crossover comparison of ventricular demand (VVI), dual chamber demand (DDI), and dual chamber universal (DDD) modes after upgrading from a VVI device. SETTING--Cardiology outpatient department. PATIENTS--Sixteen patients aged 41-84 years who were symptom free during VVI mode pacing for three or more years. INTERVENTION--Pacemaker upgrade during routine generator change. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Change in subjective (general health perception, symptoms) and objective (clinical assessment, treadmill exercise, and radiological and echocardiographic indices) results between pacing modes before and after upgrading. RESULTS--75% preferred DDD, 68% found VVI least acceptable with 12% expressing no preference. Perceived general well-being and exercise capacity (p less than 0.01) and treadmill times (p less than 0.05) were improved in DDD mode but VVI and DDI modes were similar. Clinical, echocardiographic, radiological, and electrophysiological indices confirmed the absence of overt pacemaker syndrome, although mitral and tricuspid regurgitation was greatest in VVI mode (p less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS--Most patients who were satisfied with long term pacing in VVI mode benefited from upgrading to DDD mode pacing suggesting the existence of "subclinical" pacemaker syndrome in up to 75% of such patients. The DDI mode offered little subjective or objective benefit over VVI mode in this population and should be reserved for patients with paroxysmal atrial arrhythmias. VVI mode pacing should be used only for patients with very intermittent symptomatic bradycardia or atrial fibrillation with a good chronotropic response during exercise.     

A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes

The aim of this study was to compare, both subjectively and objectively, four modern rate-responsive pacing modes in a double-blind crossover design. Twenty-two patients, aged 18 to 81 years, had an activity-sensing dual chamber universal rate-responsive (DDDR) pacemaker implanted for treatment of high grade atrioventricular block and chronotropic incompetence. They were randomly programmed to VVIR (ventricular demand rate-responsive), DDIR (dual chamber demand rate-responsive), DDD (dual chamber universal) or DDDR (dual chamber universal rate-responsive) mode and assessed after 4 weeks of out-of-hospital activity. Five patients, all with VVIR pacing, requested early reprogramming. The DDDR mode was preferred by 59% of patients; the VVIR mode was the least acceptable mode in 73%. Perceived "general well-being," exercise capacity, functional status and symptoms were significantly worse in the VVIR than in dual rate-responsive modes. Exercise treadmill time was longer in DDDR mode (p less than 0.01), but similar in all other modes. During standardized daily activities, heart rate in VVIR and DDIR modes underresponded to mental stress. All rate-augmented modes overresponded to staircase descent, whereas the DDD mode significantly underresponded to staircase ascent. Echocardiography revealed no difference in chamber dimensions, left ventricular fractional shortening or pulmonary artery pressure in any mode. Cardiac output was greater at rest in the dual modes than in the VVIR mode (p = 0.006) but was similar at 120 beats/min. Beat to beat variability of cardiac output was greatest in VVIR mode (p less than 0.0001), with DDIR showing greater variability than DDD or DDDR modes (p less than 0.05). Mitral regurgitation estimated by Doppler color flow imaging was similar in all modes, but tricuspid regurgitation was significantly greater in VVIR than in dual modes (p less than 0.03). Subjects who preferred the DDDR mode and those who found the VVIR mode least acceptable had significantly greater increases in stroke volume when paced in the DDD mode than in the ventricular-inhibited (VVI) mode at rest (22%) when compared with subjects who preferred other modes (2%, p = 0.03). No other objective variable was predictive of subjective benefit from any rate-responsive pacing mode. Thus, dual sensor rate-responsive pacing (DDDR) is superior objectively and subjectively to single sensor (VVIR, DDIR and DDD) pacing and subjective benefit from dual chamber rate-augmented pacing is predictable echocardiographically.     

Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers

To identify better those subgroups of pacemaker recipients who will benefit from dual chamber pacing, 19 patients with DDD pacemakers that were physiologically paced were entered into a blinded, randomized protocol comparing long-term VVI versus DDD pacing. Patients were evaluated in each of the pacing modes for exercise performance, cardiac chamber size, cardiac output, functional status and health perception. Eight patients (42%) insisted on early crossover, from VVI to DDD pacing, after only 1.8 +/- 1.4 weeks because of symptoms consistent with pacemaker syndrome. Overall, 12 patients preferred DDD pacing and no patient preferred VVI pacing (p = 0.001). Percent fractional shortening (30 +/- 8 vs 24 +/- 6%, p = 0.009) and cardiac output (6.3 +/- 2.6 vs 4.4 +/- 2.2 liters/min, p = 0.0001) where significantly greater in the DDD mode. Exercise duration was greater during DDD compared with VVI pacing (11.3 +/- 3.7 vs 10.1 +/- 3.7 minutes, p = 0.006). However, it was only in the crossover subgroup that DDD pacing resulted in significant improvement in exercise performance and health perception compared with VVI pacing. This subgroup of patients was characterized by an intrinsic sinus rate of less than 60 beats/min (4/8 vs 0/11, p = 0.006), ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction (4/8 vs 1/11, p = 0.048), greater increase in exercise peak systolic blood pressure from VVI to DDD mode (21 +/- 12 vs 4 +/- 13 mm Hg, p = 0.02) and greater improvement in exercise capacity from VVI to DDD pacing (2.2 +/- 1.2 vs 0.6 +/- 1.4 minutes, p = 0.03) compared with the other 11 patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of dual chamber and ventricular rate responsive pacing in patients over 75 with complete heart block.

OBJECTIVE--To compare symptoms and exercise tolerance during dual chamber universal (DDD) and ventricular rate response (VVIR) pacing in elderly (> or = 75) patients. DESIGN--Randomised, double blind, crossover study. SETTING--Regional cardiac department. PATIENTS--Twenty elderly patients (mean age 80.5 (1) years) with high grade atrioventricular block and sinus rhythm. Patients with pre-existing risk factors for the pacemaker syndrome and chronotropic incompetence were excluded. INTERVENTION--After four weeks of VVI pacing following pacemaker implantation, patients underwent consecutive two week periods of VVIR and DDD pacing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Patient preference, symptom scores, "daily activity exercises," and perceived level of exercise (Borg score). RESULTS--Eleven patients preferred DDD mode to either VVI or VVIR mode. Mean (SE) total symptom scores during VVI, VVIR, and DDD pacing were 5.9 (1.1), 6.1 (1.0), and 3.5 (0.9) respectively (P < 0.01). The corresponding mean (SE) pacemaker syndrome symptom scores were 4.8 (0.7), 5.2 (0.8), and 2.9 (0.8) (P < 0.05). Symptom scores during VVI and VVIR pacing were not significantly different. Exercise performance and Borg scores were significantly worse during VVI pacing compared with VVIR or DDD pacing but did not significantly differ between VVIR and DDD modes. CONCLUSIONS--In active elderly patients with complete heart block both DDD and VVIR pacing are associated with improved exercise performance compared with fixed rate VVI pacing. The convenience and reduced cost of VVIR systems, however, may be offset by a higher incidence of the pacemaker syndrome. In elderly patients with complete heart block VVIR pacing results in suboptimal symptomatic benefit and should not be used instead of DDD pacing.     

Left atrial appendage function during DDD and VVI pacing.

OBJECTIVE: To examine, using transoesophageal echocardiography, the possible disturbances of left atrial appendage function during VVI and DDD pacing in patients with a normal atrium paced with a dual chamber system. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary care centre. PATIENTS: 22 patients (mean age 68 (SD 6) years) who had been paced with dual chamber pacemakers for at least six months. Exclusion criteria were valvar disease, cardiomyopathy, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus. INTERVENTIONS: All patients underwent a transoesophageal echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial appendage function under DDD and VVI modes in random order. Measurements were made after at least two months' pacing in each mode. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Echocardiographic indices of left atrial appendage flow under both pacing modes. RESULTS: All 22 patients had higher emptying and filling flow velocities under DDD than under VVI mode. The filling and emptying flow velocity integrals were also significantly higher under DDD mode (P < 0.001, P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Left atrial appendage function, as reflected in indices of emptying and filling assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography, is significantly different with DDD than with VVI pacing. This may explain the higher incidence of thromboembolic episodes in patients paced under VVI mode.     

Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block.

OBJECTIVE--To compare the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive pacing (activity sensing) (VVIR) in patients with complete heart block. DESIGN--Double blind crossover comparison with one month in each pacing mode. PATIENTS--10 consecutive patients aged 23-74 presenting with complete anterograde atrioventricular block at rest and on exercise and with an intact atrial rate response received Synergyst I (Medtronic) pacemakers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Symptom scores, maximal exercise performance on a treadmill, and the plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide, adrenaline, and noradrenaline. RESULTS--No significant differences were identified between pacing modes in symptom scores for dyspnoea, fatigue, and mood disturbance; exercise time; and maximal oxygen consumption. One patient with intact ventriculoatrial conduction developed pacemaker syndrome during VVIR pacing. Resting plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide were raised in complete heart block and were restored to normal by DDD pacing but not by VVIR pacing. Resting plasma catecholamine concentrations were normal in complete heart block and in both pacing modes. During exercise the increase in the concentrations of all three hormones was similar in both pacing modes. CONCLUSIONS--In patients with complete anterograde and retrograde atrioventricular block, symptoms and maximal exercise performance were no better during DDD than during VVIR pacing.     

Double blind crossover comparison of the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive (VVIR) pacing on neuroendocrine variables, exercise performance, and symptoms in complete heart block.

OBJECTIVE--To compare the effects of dual chamber pacing (DDD) and ventricular rate adaptive pacing (activity sensing) (VVIR) in patients with complete heart block. DESIGN--Double blind crossover comparison with one month in each pacing mode. PATIENTS--10 consecutive patients aged 23-74 presenting with complete anterograde atrioventricular block at rest and on exercise and with an intact atrial rate response received Synergyst I (Medtronic) pacemakers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Symptom scores, maximal exercise performance on a treadmill, and the plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide, adrenaline, and noradrenaline. RESULTS--No significant differences were identified between pacing modes in symptom scores for dyspnoea, fatigue, and mood disturbance; exercise time; and maximal oxygen consumption. One patient with intact ventriculoatrial conduction developed pacemaker syndrome during VVIR pacing. Resting plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide were raised in complete heart block and were restored to normal by DDD pacing but not by VVIR pacing. Resting plasma catecholamine concentrations were normal in complete heart block and in both pacing modes. During exercise the increase in the concentrations of all three hormones was similar in both pacing modes. CONCLUSIONS--In patients with complete anterograde and retrograde atrioventricular block, symptoms and maximal exercise performance were no better during DDD than during VVIR pacing.     

Optimum pacing mode for patients with angina pectoris

A within patient double blind prospective study of symptoms and exercise tolerance was designed to determine the preferred pacing mode in 10 patients with programmable dual chamber pacemakers who also had angina pectoris. Patients were randomly allocated to one month in each of the following modes: ventricular pacing at 70 beats/min (VVI) or atrioventricular synchronous upper rate 150 beats/min (DDD 150) or 100 beats/min (DDD 100). Medications were unchanged throughout the study; none was taking beta blockers. At the end of each month patients underwent an exercise test. During each month patients recorded symptoms and their preferred pacing mode. DDD 100 was the preferred mode (seven patients). There was significantly less chest pain with this mode than with either of the other modes. There were significantly more episodes of dizziness in VVI, and two patients who developed pacemaker syndrome were unable to complete the pacing period. Three patients developed angina during exercise testing in DDD 150. Atrial synchronous ventricular pacing is better than ventricular pacing for the control of symptoms in patients with angina pectoris provided that the upper atrial tracking rate is limited.     

Optimum pacing mode for patients with angina pectoris.

A within patient double blind prospective study of symptoms and exercise tolerance was designed to determine the preferred pacing mode in 10 patients with programmable dual chamber pacemakers who also had angina pectoris. Patients were randomly allocated to one month in each of the following modes: ventricular pacing at 70 beats/min (VVI) or atrioventricular synchronous upper rate 150 beats/min (DDD 150) or 100 beats/min (DDD 100). Medications were unchanged throughout the study; none was taking beta blockers. At the end of each month patients underwent an exercise test. During each month patients recorded symptoms and their preferred pacing mode. DDD 100 was the preferred mode (seven patients). There was significantly less chest pain with this mode than with either of the other modes. There were significantly more episodes of dizziness in VVI, and two patients who developed pacemaker syndrome were unable to complete the pacing period. Three patients developed angina during exercise testing in DDD 150. Atrial synchronous ventricular pacing is better than ventricular pacing for the control of symptoms in patients with angina pectoris provided that the upper atrial tracking rate is limited.     

Effect of AV synchronization and rate increase on hemodynamics and on atrial natriuretic peptide in patients with total AV block

We studied nine patients (56 +/- 7 years) with complete AV-block and permanent dual-chamber pacemaker (DDD) under different pacing modes: ventricle pacing (VVI) 70 bpm, DDD 106 +/- 4 bpm, rate adaptive pacing (VVI-FA) 108 +/- 3 bpm. Exercise was performed supine on the bicycle ergometer at 50 watts for 5 min at each setting. DDD-paced patients showed significantly higher mixed venous oxygen saturation, being 45 +/- 2% after the fourth minute, (VVI 38 +/- 2%, p less than 0.01 and VVI-FA paced patients 40 +/- 1%, p less than 0.01). Pressures were normal under DDD pacing during exercise (RAP 7 +/- 2 mm Hg; PCP 14 +/- 3 mm Hg) and showed further increase to abnormal levels during VVI (RAP 13 +/- 2 mm Hg, p less than 0.01; PCP 21 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.02) and VVI-FA pacing (RAP 10 +/- 2 mm Hg, p less than 0.05; PCP 20 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.01). Stroke volume increased from 71 +/- 5 ml to 105 +/- 7 ml during VVI and from 64 +/- 7 ml to 81 +/- 7 ml during DDD pacing. Stroke volume remained unchanged (69 +/- 5 ml) during VVI-FA pacing. The peak levels of ANP during and after exercise were significantly higher under VVI (951 +/- 248 pg/ml) than under DDD pacing (650 +/- 140 pg/ml, p less than 0.01) and were not different between DDD and VVI-FA pacing (677 +/- 97 pg/ml). These results show that VVI pacing effects a more pronounced increase of ANP level than other pacing modes. Under moderate exercise, rate-responsive pacing compared to VVI pacing showed no differences in mixed venous oxygen saturation and in atrial pressures. Only DDD pacing showed higher oxygen saturation and a normalization of atrial pressures when compared to other types of single chamber pacing.     

Dual chamber pacing: how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term?

OBJECTIVE--DDD pacing is better than VVI pacing in complete heart block and sick sinus syndrome but is more expensive and demanding. In addition, some patients have to be programmed out of DDD mode and this may have an important impact on the cost-effectiveness of DDD pacing. The purpose of this study was to determine how many patients remain in DDD mode over the long term (up to 10 years). DESIGN--A retrospective analysis of the outcome over 10 years of consecutive patients who had their pacemakers programmed initially in DDD mode. SETTING--A district general hospital. PATIENTS--249 patients with DDD pacemakers. Sixty two patients (24.9%) had predominantly sick sinus syndrome and 180 (72.3%) had predominantly atrioventricular conduction disease. Mean (range) complete follow up for this group of patients was 32 months (1-10 years). RESULTS--Cumulative survival of DDD mode was 83.5% at 60 months. Atrial fibrillation was the commonest reason for abandonment of DDD pacing. Atrial fibrillation developed in 30 patients (12%), with atrial flutter in three (1.2%). Loss of atrial sensing or pacing, pacemaker mediated tachycardia, and various other reasons accounted for reprogramming out of DDD mode in eight patients (3.2%). Overall, an atrial pacing mode was maintained in 91% and VVI pacing was needed in only 9%. CONCLUSIONS--With careful use of programming facilities and appropriate secondary intervention, most patients with dual chamber pacemakers can be maintained successfully in DDD or an alternative atrial pacing mode until elective replacement, although atrial arrhythmia remains a significant problem. There are no good reasons, other than cost, for not using dual chamber pacing routinely as suggested by recent guidelines and this policy can be achieved successfully in a district general hospital pacing centre.     

VVI mode cardiac pacing: cause or risk factor of cerebral embolism?]

Epidemiological studies suggest that VVI pacing is associated with a higher risk of embolic complications than atrial or dual chamber pacing. However, no studies have been performed on pacemaker patients admitted to a neurological department with a cerebral embolism. The authors report the cases of 8 patients (6 men and 2 women) with an average age of 74 years and having the following characteristics: 1) a cerebral embolism, 2) a permanent cardiac pacemaker (7 VVI and 1 DDD mode). The average delay between implantation of the pacemaker and the neurological complication was 31 months. Cardiological investigations at the time of admission showed: a clinically evident cause of cardiac embolism in 3 cases (2 with VVI and 1 with DDD pacing); paroxysmal or permanent atrial fibrillation in 4 cases with VVI pacing at the time of the embolic event (in only one case at the time of implantation); various echocardiographic abnormalities in 6 of the 7 patients who underwent this examination, mainly left atrial dilatation (6/7), septal wall motion abnormalities in all related to ventricular pacing and unexplained left ventricular dilatation in 2 patients with VVI pacemakers. These results suggest that although the etiology of cerebral embolism was probably multifactorial in some patients, VVI packing probably a predisposing role, though not the only cause, and could be considered to be an embolic risk factor as suggested by previous epidemiological studies. These preliminary retrospective data should be interpreted cautiously taking into account the small population size. Prospective studies on pacemaker patients with cerebral embolism are required.     

Subjective and Objective Response to Single- Versus Dual-Chamber Pacing

With two different questionnaires, we analyzed the feeling of well-being during dual chamber pacing mode and VVI mode in 25 randomly selected patients, mean age 66.7 years (range 22–84). All patients had high degree AV block and received either a DDD pacemaker (23 patients) or a VDD pacemaker. Under each pacing mode exercise tests were performed as well. Questionnaire 1 was answered during DDD or VDD mode. According to questionnaire 1, 76% of the patients remembered their symptoms before PM implantation. Eighty-two percent of the patients felt an improvement of their symptoms after the installation of the pacemaker. Questionnaire 2 was answered after a three-week period of VVI pacing. Fifty-six of the patients indicated a deterioration of their general conditions, 36% of the patients noted dizziness, 58% dyspnea, 40% reduced effort tolerance, and 22% a sleep disturbance. After a change to dual-chamber pacing, general well-being was better in 74% of the patients, dyspnea was noted in only 15%, effort tolerance was improved in 61%, and sleep was undisturbed in 97%. The physical work capacity (expressed as a product of Watts multiplied by minutes) tested on a bicycle ergometer was 400 ± 190 Wmin in VVI mode and 414 ± 272 Wmin in DDD/VDD mode (p = ns). The double products were 14,600 ± 4,934 and 22,066 ± 5,585 (p < 0.05), respectively. We conclude that dual-chamber pacing leads to a significant improvement in the quality of life for patients with symptomatic AV block.     

Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.

Nine hundred fifty patients who received three modes of primary pacemaker systems (581 dual-chamber universal [DDD], 84 atrioventricular-sequential ventricular-inhibited [DVI] and 285 ventricular-inhibited [VVI]) over 12 years were studied retrospectively to determine the effect of pacing mode on patient longevity and the subsequent development of chronic atrial fibrillation or flutter. All patients were followed up continuously for 7 to 8 years. Patients were classified according to indication for permanent pacing (sick sinus syndrome or other indication), age at pacemaker implantation (less than or equal to 70 or greater than 70 years) and history of atrial tachyarrhythmia. Fourteen percent of patients developed atrial fibrillation at some time during the study period. Of those, 4% had a DDD pacemaker, 8% had a DVI pacemaker and 19% had a VVI pacemaker. At 7 years, atrial fibrillation was significantly more frequent in the VVI group than in the DDD and DVI groups. In patients with sick sinus syndrome, the incidence rate was even higher in the VVI group but approximately the same in the DDD and DVI groups. Patients in the VVI and DVI groups who had had previous atrial tachyarrhythmia had a significantly higher incidence of atrial fibrillation at 7 years than did those in the DDD group. During the entire period there were 130 deaths in the study group, including 22% of patients with a DDD pacemaker, 38% of those with a DVI pacemaker and 50% of those with a VVI pacemaker. Patient survival at 7 years was lower in the VVI group than in the DDD or DVI groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Pacing for sinus node disease: A therapeutic rationale

Symptomatic sinus node disease is a common indication for permanent pacemaker implantation. Single-chamber ventricular (VVI) pacing, single-chamber atrial (AAI) stimulation, and dual-chamber (DDD or DDI) systems are used to a varying extent at different implanting centers. Hemodynamic and clinical studies relevant to the choice of pacing mode in these patients are reviewed. The data currently available strongly support the use of pacing systems providing atrial stimulation. The choice between single-chamber atrial or dual-chamber pacing can be based on the relative importance assigned to a number of factors: Hemodynamic aspects, the risk of ventricular lead problems, cost, and complexity aspects favor AAI pacing, whereas patients with a substantial risk of developing atrioventricular block should receive a DDD or DDI unit.     

A comparison of sympathoadrenal activity and cardiac performance at rest and during exercise in patients with ventricular demand or atrial synchronous pacing

Cardiac sympathetic function was assessed by measuring the coronary sinus overflow of noradrenaline and dopamine at rest and during supine exercise in eight patients with high degree atrioventricular block treated with dual chamber pacemakers (DDD). Patients exercised (30-60 W) during both ventricular inhibited (VVI) and atrial synchronous (VAT) pacing. During exercise cardiac output increased less markedly in the VVI mode than in the VAT mode. The cardiac output response was entirely stroke volume dependent in the VVI mode and mainly heart rate dependent in the VAT mode. Coronary sinus noradrenaline concentrations were higher in the VVI mode at rest and during exercise. Noradrenaline overflow from the heart was enhanced during VVI pacing and increased from about 100 pmol/min (17 ng/min) at rest to 1087 pmol/min during exercise (60 W) in the VVI mode and 545 pmol/min in the VAT mode. Dopamine overflow from the heart was less than 5 pmol/at rest but increased 2-5 fold during exercise. Also arterial concentrations of catecholamine increased more during exercise in the VVI mode, but the differences between pacing modes were less pronounced. Circulating adrenaline seems to be of little importance for cardiac function under these conditions; in healthy individuals the arterial concentrations of adrenaline attained in this study have small effects. Cardiac noradrenaline overflow correlated with pulmonary capillary venous pressures and atrial rates in both pacing modes, indicating a relation between cardiac sympathetic activity and cardiac function. Enhanced cardiac release of noradrenaline may increase cardiac contractility and thereby partially compensate for the lack of heart rate responsiveness to exercise during VVI pacing.     

埋藏式心脏起搏器治疗病态窦房结综合症130例临床总结

目的:探讨在病态窦房结综合征(SSS)患者起搏治疗中各种起搏模式的比例及对患者临床预后的影响。方法:对我院130例行起搏器安装术SSS患者的资料,进行起搏模式及临床预后分析。结果:130例患者中生理性起搏(AAI／DDD)占27.6％,其中AAI起搏占11.2％,DDD起搏占16.4％;心室按需型起搏(VVI)占72.4％。植入起搏器能明显改善SSS患者的临床症状,在生理性起搏组中永久性房颤、心衰的发生率以及患者死亡率均明显低于非生理性起搏组(P<0.05~<0.01),手术并发症发生率为10.8％,主要并发症为电极脱位和感知障碍。结论:生理性起搏是治疗SSS较理想的起搏方式,但目前应用的比例仍偏低。     

A comparison of sympathoadrenal activity and cardiac performance at rest and during exercise in patients with ventricular demand or atrial synchronous pacing.

Cardiac sympathetic function was assessed by measuring the coronary sinus overflow of noradrenaline and dopamine at rest and during supine exercise in eight patients with high degree atrioventricular block treated with dual chamber pacemakers (DDD). Patients exercised (30-60 W) during both ventricular inhibited (VVI) and atrial synchronous (VAT) pacing. During exercise cardiac output increased less markedly in the VVI mode than in the VAT mode. The cardiac output response was entirely stroke volume dependent in the VVI mode and mainly heart rate dependent in the VAT mode. Coronary sinus noradrenaline concentrations were higher in the VVI mode at rest and during exercise. Noradrenaline overflow from the heart was enhanced during VVI pacing and increased from about 100 pmol/min (17 ng/min) at rest to 1087 pmol/min during exercise (60 W) in the VVI mode and 545 pmol/min in the VAT mode. Dopamine overflow from the heart was less than 5 pmol/at rest but increased 2-5 fold during exercise. Also arterial concentrations of catecholamine increased more during exercise in the VVI mode, but the differences between pacing modes were less pronounced. Circulating adrenaline seems to be of little importance for cardiac function under these conditions; in healthy individuals the arterial concentrations of adrenaline attained in this study have small effects. Cardiac noradrenaline overflow correlated with pulmonary capillary venous pressures and atrial rates in both pacing modes, indicating a relation between cardiac sympathetic activity and cardiac function. Enhanced cardiac release of noradrenaline may increase cardiac contractility and thereby partially compensate for the lack of heart rate responsiveness to exercise during VVI pacing.     

Benefits of dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome

The effects of DDD (fully automatic) and VVI (ventricular demand) pacing modes on exercise tolerance, symptom diary cards, and Holter monitoring were investigated in a randomised double blind crossover study of 16 patients who had had DDD pacemakers implanted because of frequent syncope. Eight patients presented with sick sinus syndrome and, with one exception, retrograde atrioventricular conduction and eight age and sex matched patients presented with 2:1 or complete atrioventricular block. Maximal symptom limited exercise in those with atrioventricular block was significantly higher after one month of DDD pacing than after VVI pacing. In those with sick sinus syndrome, however, maximal effort tolerance was not significantly different for the two pacing modes. In all but one patient with sick sinus syndrome sinus rhythm developed during exercise in VVI pacing. For both VVI and DDD modes maximal atrial rates were significantly lower in those with sick sinus syndrome. Palpitation and general wellbeing were significantly improved during DDD pacing in the eight patients with sick sinus syndrome. Shortness of breath was improved by DDD pacing in the eight patients with atrioventricular block but not in those with sick sinus syndrome. Holter monitoring showed that sick sinus syndrome patients remained in paced rhythm, either DDD or VVI, for most of the 24 hour period. DDD pacing was better than VVI pacing in sick sinus syndrome with retrograde atrioventricular conduction. Despite their ability to show sinus rhythm and inhibit their pacemakers on exercise patients with sick sinus syndrome are just as likely to have symptomatic benefit from DDD pacing as patients with atrioventricular block.     

Benefits of dual chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.

The effects of DDD (fully automatic) and VVI (ventricular demand) pacing modes on exercise tolerance, symptom diary cards, and Holter monitoring were investigated in a randomised double blind crossover study of 16 patients who had had DDD pacemakers implanted because of frequent syncope. Eight patients presented with sick sinus syndrome and, with one exception, retrograde atrioventricular conduction and eight age and sex matched patients presented with 2:1 or complete atrioventricular block. Maximal symptom limited exercise in those with atrioventricular block was significantly higher after one month of DDD pacing than after VVI pacing. In those with sick sinus syndrome, however, maximal effort tolerance was not significantly different for the two pacing modes. In all but one patient with sick sinus syndrome sinus rhythm developed during exercise in VVI pacing. For both VVI and DDD modes maximal atrial rates were significantly lower in those with sick sinus syndrome. Palpitation and general wellbeing were significantly improved during DDD pacing in the eight patients with sick sinus syndrome. Shortness of breath was improved by DDD pacing in the eight patients with atrioventricular block but not in those with sick sinus syndrome. Holter monitoring showed that sick sinus syndrome patients remained in paced rhythm, either DDD or VVI, for most of the 24 hour period. DDD pacing was better than VVI pacing in sick sinus syndrome with retrograde atrioventricular conduction. Despite their ability to show sinus rhythm and inhibit their pacemakers on exercise patients with sick sinus syndrome are just as likely to have symptomatic benefit from DDD pacing as patients with atrioventricular block.