Comparison of LH concentrations in the early and mid-luteal phase in IVF cycles after treatment with HMG alone or in association with the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix

Luteinizing hormone (LH) is mandatory for the maintenance of the corpus luteum. Ovarian stimulation for IVF has been associated with a defective luteal phase. The luteal phases of two groups of patients with normal menstrual cycles and no endocrinological cause of infertility were retrospectively analysed in IVF cycles. Thirty-one infertile patients stimulated with human menopausal gonadotrophins (HMG) for IVF to whom the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was also administered to prevent the LH surge (group I) were compared with 31 infertile patients stimulated with HMG alone (group II). Despite differences in the stimulation outcome, luteal LH serum concentrations were similar in the two groups. LH values dropped from 2.3 +/- 1 IU/l on the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration to 1.1 +/- 0.7 IU/l on day HCG +2 in group I (P < 0.0001) and from 5.1 +/- 3 to 1.2 +/- 1.7 IU/l (P < 0.0001) in group II. In the mid-luteal phase, LH concentrations were low in both groups. Our results suggest that suppressed LH concentrations in the early and mid-luteal phase may not be attributed solely to the GnRH-antagonist administration. Pituitary LH secretion may be inhibited by supraphysiological steroid serum concentrations via long-loop feedback and/or by the central action of the exogenously administered HCG via a short-loop mechanism.     

Comparison of luteal phase profile in gonadotrophin stimulated cycles with or without a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to explore luteal phase hormone profiles in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles with or without gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist therapy during intrauterine insemination (IUI). Forty-one infertile couples were recruited in this randomized clinical study. METHODS: The 19 patients included in group A were treated for 21 cycles with recombinant FSH 150 IU/day starting from day 3 of the cycle and with the GnRH antagonist cetrorelix at the dose of 0.25 mg/day starting from the day in which a follicle with a mean diameter of > or =14 mm was seen at ultrasound scan. Cetrorelix was administered until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. The 22 patients included in group B were administered recombinant FSH alone at the same dosage for 27 cycles. RESULTS: The two treatment groups showed a similar increase in progesterone concentration during the luteal phase. In the mid-luteal phase (day 6 after HCG), oestradiol concentrations in group B were significantly higher compared with group A (P < 0.05) but the oestradiol:progesterone ratio was similar in the two groups. Serum LH was completely suppressed during the follicular phase only in group A, concomitantly with GnRH antagonist administration. A total of six pregnancies, all ongoing, were achieved (14.3% per patient and 12.2% per cycle), equally distributed in group A and in group B. CONCLUSION: GnRH antagonists can be safely administered in gonadotrophin-stimulated IUI cycles without luteal phase supplementation because no deleterious effects of GnRH antagonist administration were noted on luteal progesterone concentration or on the duration of the luteal phase.     

Addition of GnRH antagonist in cycles of poor responders undergoing IVF

Concern about the use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists in ovarian stimulation of poor responder IVF patients has arisen from the claim that GnRH agonists might have a direct deleterious effect through their receptors on the ovary. In this study, we compared two ovarian stimulation protocols in which no GnRH agonists were used. In all, 40 patients with a poor response in previous treatment cycles were included. They were divided into two groups: group I (n = 20) received ovarian stimulation for 20 cycles, without the addition of either GnRH agonist or antagonist; while group II (n = 20) patients received ovarian stimulation for 20 cycles, including the administration of a GnRH antagonist (Cetrorelix, 0.25 mg daily) during the late follicular phase. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups for mean age, duration of infertility, baseline FSH concentration, cancellation rate, number of ampoules of gonadotrophin used, number of mature oocytes retrieved, oestradiol concentrations on the day of injection of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), fertilization rate and number of embryos transferred. The clinical pregnancy and implantation rates in group II appeared higher than in group I, but were not significantly different (20 and 13.33% compared with 6.25 and 3.44% respectively). The addition of GnRH antagonists to ovarian stimulation protocols might be a new hope for poor responder IVF patients, but this report is preliminary and further controlled randomized prospective studies with larger sample sizes are required.     

Revival of the natural cycles in in-vitro fertilization with the use of a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix): a pilot study with minimal stimulation

Natural cycles were abandoned in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) embryo transfer, due to premature luteinizing hormone (LH) surges--and subsequent high cancellation rates. In this study, we investigated the administration of a new gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist (Cetrorelix) in the late follicular phase of natural cycles in patients undergoing IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). A total of 44 cycles from 33 healthy women [mean age 34.1 +/- 1.4 (range 26-36) years] were monitored, starting on day 8 by daily ultrasound and measurement of serum concentrations of oestradiol, LH, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) and progesterone. When plasma oestradiol concentrations reached 100-150 pg/ml, with a lead follicle between 12-14 mm diameter, a single injection (s.c.) of 0.5 mg (19 cycles) or 1 mg (25 cycles) Cetrorelix was administered. Human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG; 150 IU) was administered daily at the time of the first injection of Cetrorelix, and repeated thereafter until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. Four out of 44 cycles were cancelled (9.0%). No decline in follicular growth or oestradiol secretion was observed after Cetrorelix administration. A total of 40 oocyte retrievals leading to 22 transfers (55%) was performed. In 10 cycles (25%), no oocyte was obtained. Fertilization failure despite ICSI occurred in six cycles (15%). In two patients the embryo was arrested at the 2 pronuclear (PN) stage. The stimulation was minimal (4.7 +/- 1.4 HMG ampoules). A total of seven clinical pregnancies was obtained (32.0% per transfer, 17.5% per retrieval), of which five are ongoing. Thus, a spontaneous cycle and the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix in single dose administration could represent a first-choice IVF treatment with none of the complications and risks of current controlled ovarian hyperstimulation protocols, and an acceptable success rate.     

Will GnRH antagonists provide new hope for patients considered 'difficult responders' to GnRH agonist protocols?

We have assessed the use of cetrorelix, a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, in conjunction with clomiphene citrate and gonadotrophin in 31 in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) cycles for 25 difficult responders. Group I included 18 poor responders (24 cycles) with no live birth in 23 previous IVF cycles with GnRH agonists. Group II included seven patients (seven cycles) with polycystic ovaries. Thirteen previous IVF/GIFT cycles with GnRH agonists had resulted in one live birth and three of these patients had developed ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The treatment protocol involved a daily dose of clomiphene citrate 100 mg for 5 days and gonadotrophin injections from cycle day 2. Cetrorelix 0.25 mg/day was started when the leading follicle reached 14 mm. The outcome in both groups was favourable compared to previous treatment with GnRH agonists. In group I the abandoned cycle rate was 29 versus 57% (P = 0.06). More oocytes were produced (6.4 versus 4.7 oocytes/cycle) at a lower dose of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (709 versus 1163 IU/oocyte; P = 0.08) and two live births resulted (11.8%). In group II fewer oocytes were produced (10.2 versus 14.5 oocytes/cycle), using a lower dose of gonadotrophin (170 versus 189 IU/oocyte) and resulted in one ongoing pregnancy. No patients experienced OHSS. This report is preliminary and a further controlled randomized study is required.     

Preliminary experience of the use of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist in ovulation induction/in-vitro fertilization prior to cancer treatment.

Therapeutic regimens for the treatment of malignant disease may compromise future fertility. One approach to circumvent this is the cryopreservation of embryos created before treatment for the malignancy. Conventional regimens using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists are time consuming, requiring pituitary down-regulation before gonadotrophin administration, thus the duration of treatment is approximately 20-30 days. GnRH antagonists, however, do not cause an initial stimulation of gonadotrophin secretion and can thus be administered during the later stages of follicular maturation to prevent premature luteinization and ovulation. The duration of ovulation induction/in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment is thus reduced. In this study, case histories are reported of six women with newly diagnosed malignancies who requested ovulation induction/IVF prior to chemotherapy or surgery in which we have used the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix. Gonadotrophin administration was started in the early follicular phase, and Cetrorelix (0.25 mg s.c. daily) was added from day 6 of treatment. Subsequent to human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration oocytes were recovered and successful fertilization and embryo cryopreservation was achieved in all cases. The median duration of treatment was 12 days (range 8-13, including induction of luteolysis in two patients). These results illustrate the potential use and advantages of a GnRH antagonist in ovulation induction/IVF when the need for immediate initiation of treatment and its duration are critical factors.     

Endocrinology: Human chorionic gonadotrophin is a better luteal support than progesterone in ultrashort gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist/menotrophin in-vitro fertilization cycles

In an attempt to determine the best luteal support in in-vitrofertilization (IVF) cycles treated with gonadotrophin-releasinghormone agonist (GnRHa) and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)by the ultrashort protocol, 60 patients were prospectively randomizedfor either i.m. progesterone or human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) luteal support. The two groups did not differ in the meannumber of oocytes retrieved and embryos replaced, nor in themean age of the patients and the amount of HMG used. HCG maintainedhigher levels of oestradiol and progesterone during the lutealphase. Conception rate was significantly higher in the HCG group.We conclude that HCG is superior to i.m. progesterone as lutealsupport in IVF cycles in which GnRHa is used in the ultrashortprotocol.     

Hormonal and histological evaluation of the luteal phase after combined GnRH-agonist/gonadotrophin treatment for superovulation and luteal phase support in in-vitro fertilization.

A hormonal and histological study of the luteal phase was performed in 21 stimulated in-vitro fertilization (IVF) patients not undergoing embryo transfer. Ovarian stimulation was carried out with gonadotrophins [follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) + human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)] under pituitary suppression with buserelin. Ovulation was induced with 5000 IU human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) and additional doses of 5000, 2500 and 2500 IU were given on the day of follicular aspiration, and 2 and 5 days later respectively, to support the luteal phase. Supraphysiological levels of oestradiol (E2) and progesterone in plasma were found in the midluteal phase of all women, while prolactin was in the normal range. An endometrial biopsy taken in the late luteal phase was normal in 90.5% (19/21) of patients, most of them (15/19, 79%) having E2 greater than 1500 pg/ml on the day of HCG. Conversely, both patients with defective endometrial biopsies had E2 levels less than 1500 pg/ml.     

Ovarian stimulation by concomitant administration of cetrorelix acetate and HMG following Diane-35 pre-treatment for patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: Patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) may need a longer period of pituitary downregulation to suppress the elevated serum LH and androgen levels effectively during IVF treatment using the GnRH agonist long protocol. We proposed a stimulation protocol incorporating Diane-35 and GnRH antagonist (Diane/cetrorelix protocol) and compared it with the GnRH agonist long protocol for PCOS patients. METHODS: Part I of the study was an observational pilot study to evaluate the hormonal change as a result of the Diane/cetrorelix protocol (n = 26). Part II of the study was a prospective randomized study comparing the Diane/cetrorelix protocol (n = 25) and the GnRH agonist long protocol (n = 24). In the Diane/cetrorelix protocol, patients were pre-treated with three cycles of Diane-35, followed by 0.25 mg of cetrorelix on cycle day 3. From day 4, cetrorelix and gonadotrophin were administered concomitantly until the day of HCG injection. RESULTS: Serum LH, estradiol and testosterone levels were suppressed comparably in both protocols at the start of gonadotrophin administration. Serum LH was suppressed at constant levels without a premature LH surge in the Diane/cetrorelix protocol. The clinical results for both protocols were comparable, with significantly fewer days of injection, lower amounts of gonadotrophin used and lower estradiol levels on the day of HCG injection following the Diane/cetrorelix protocol. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in clinical pregnancy outcome between the two stimulation protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The Diane/cetrorelix protocol has a similar pregnancy outcome to the GnRH agonist long protocol for women with PCOS undergoing IVF treatment.     

Recurrent empty follicle syndrome successfully treated with recombinant human chorionic gonadotrophin.

We report a case of a patient with polycystic ovary syndrome and primary infertility who was admitted to our in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) programme because of her partner's severe oligozoospermia and asthenozoospermia. Ovarian stimulation was accomplished in the three treatment cycles using gonadotrophin therapy after a dual approach with ovarian suppression using oral contraceptive pills followed by gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist therapy. Oocyte retrieval was unsuccessful in the first two treated cycles despite the fact that human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) from three different batches was used. In the third treatment cycle, recombinant HCG was used and five oocytes were retrieved. This is the first report of recurrent empty follicle syndrome despite the use of different batches of commercially available urinary HCG, and of its successful treatment using recombinant HCG.     

A prospective randomized trial of human chorionic gonadotrophin or dydrogesterone support following in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer

A randomized, prospective blind study was carried out to investigate the need for luteal phase support in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). One-hundred-and-fifty-six patients undergoing IVF in cycles stimulated with human menopausal gonadotropin (HMG) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) stimulated IVF, were divided into three different groups for luteal phase treatment. Fifty-four patients received dydrogesterone three times daily (TID) beginning on the day of embryo transfer (ET). Fifty-one patients received HCG on days 3, 6 and 10 following ET. Fifty-one patients received placebo p.o. TID beginning on the day of ET. There was no difference between the groups in pregnancy rate, rate of spontaneous abortion, proportion of normally developing fetuses or rate of chemical pregnancy. The data indicate that supplementation of the luteal phase may not improve the success rates of IVF-ET cycles.     

Oocyte and embryo quality as well as pregnancy rate in intracytoplasmic sperm injection are not affected by high follicular phase serum progesterone

The effect of elevated serum progesterone concentrations (>1ng/1) on or before the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin(HCG) injection on the outcome of women receiving gonadotrophin-releasinghormone analogue (GnRHa)/ human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG)for ovarian stimulation prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI) was evaluated. A total of 1275 ICSI cycles were analysedretrospectively. In 53 cycles (4.5%), serum progesterone concentrationswere > 1 ng/ml. Patients in the high progesterone group hadsignificantly higher oestradiol and luteinizing hormone concentrationson the day of HCG injection. The characteristics of the cumulus-coronacell complexes and the nuclear maturity of the oocytes weresimilar in the groups of patients with high and low serum progesteronelevels. Fertilization and cleavage rates as well as embryo qualitywere not different in the two groups. No difference in implantationor clinical pregnancy rates was observed between the high progesteroneand low progesterone groups. Moreover, the cumulative exposureto progesterone during the follicular phase, as expressed bythe area under the curve (AUC), and the duration of exposureto high serum progesterone levels (>1 ng/ml) were not significantlydifferent between pregnant and non-pregnant women in the highprogesterone group. We conclude that in ICSI cycles pretreatedwith GnRHa, increased serum progesterone concentrations on orbefore the day of HCG injection do not affect ICSI outcome.     

Suppression of the endogenous luteinizing hormone surge by the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist Cetrorelix during ovarian stimulation

Surges of luteinizing hormone (LH) that result In luteinizationbut occur prematurely with respect to the diameter of the leadingfolilde, prevent attempts to induce multiple follicular maturationfor in-vitro fertilization (IVF) in a significant number ofwomen. We examined the possibility of blocking premature LIIsurges by the administration of Cetrorelix, a potent antagonistof gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH), in a study Including20 patients, some of whom had previously shown premature LHsurges. All patients were treated with human menopausal gonadotrophins(HMG) starting on day 2. From day 7 until the induction of ovulationby human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) the GnRII antagon Cetrorelixwas given daily. HCG was injected when the dominant fofficlehad reached a diameter of >18 mm and oestradlol concentrationwas >300 pg/ml for each follicle having a diameter of >15mm. Oocyte collection was performed 36 h later by transvaginalultrasound puncture, followed by IVF and embryo transfer. Thehormone profiles of these patients and the results of IVF andembryo transfer are comparable to those treated with GnRH agonistsand HMG. However, less time and especially less HMG Is neededin comparison to patients stimulated with a long agonist protocol.Hence, treatment with Cetrorelix proved to be much more comfortablefor the patient. In this study we showed that combined treatmentwith gonadotrophins and the GnRH antagonist Cetrorelix is apromising method for ovarian stimulation in patients who frequentlyexhibit premature LH surges and therefore fall to complete treatment.     

Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in assisted reproduction cycles of patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND: During IVF or ICSI cycles, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a major problem. The aim of this prospective, multicentre, comparative study (using historical controls) was to assess the efficacy of a GnRH antagonist protocol in preventing OHSS in selected patients who had experienced OHSS or had been at risk of OHSS in their previous IVF/ICSI attempt. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients underwent a new cycle where the same gonadotrophin protocol was used [same dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH)] but a different protocol was used for pituitary desensitization: cetrorelix 0.25 mg multiple-dose antagonist instead of GnRH agonist long protocol. Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was administered daily, starting when the leading follicle reached a diameter of 14 mm. In other words, rFSH was administered in the new cycle according to the dosage and the step-up or step-down modalities used during the previous cycle, independently of ultrasound findings and serum estradiol (E(2)) levels. Eighty-seven patients entered the study. Out of the 87 cycles involving GnRH agonists, 49 (56.3%) were cancelled and out of the 87 involving GnRH antagonists 28 (32.2%) were cancelled [McNemar's test; 95% confidence interval (CI) -35.8% to -11.2%; P < 0.001]. After GnRH agonist cycles, we recorded 24 cases of OHSS (18 moderate and six severe; 27.6%), whereas after the GnRH antagonist cycles there were 10 cases of OHSS (nine moderate and one severe; 11.5%) (95% CI-26.4% to -5.7%; P = 0.006). There was a statistically significant reduction in the total number of follicles with a diameter >10 mm (Wilcoxon's test; Z = 6.1; P < 0.001) and of E(2) levels on the day of HCG administration (2538 versus 4322.4 pg/ml; P < 0.001) in the GnRH antagonist cycles versus GnRH agonist cycles. Twenty-nine patients had an embryo transfer in the first cycle (76.3% of oocyte retrievals) and 57 in the cycle using GnRH antagonist (96.6%). This 20.3% difference was also significant (Z-test; 95% CI 6.8-36.0%; P = 0.003). After the antagonist cycles, 18 pregnancies (20.7 per initiated cycle; 31.6% per embryo transfer) were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study presents some limitations owing to the use of historical controls, our data show a favourable effect of GnRH antagonists in reducing the incidence of OHSS and the number of assisted fertilization cycles cancelled because of the risk of OHSS in high responder patients. As a consequence, GnRH antagonist plus gonadotrophin administration could also increase the percentage of oocyte retrievals and embryo transfers in this high risk group of patients.     

Follicular and luteal phase characteristics following early cessation of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist during ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are widely used in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) for the prevention of a premature rise in luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations. However, the administration of GnRHa during the follicular phase may also impair subsequent luteal function due to retarded recovery of pituitary gonadotrophin secretion. Therefore, luteal supplementation is generally applied. The present study was designed to determine whether a premature LH surge would still be prevented after early cessation of GnRHa during ovarian stimulation and whether subsequent luteal phase LH production would be sufficient to support progesterone synthesis by the corpus luteum. Sixty patients were randomized for three groups: (i) A long GnRHa/human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) protocol with luteal support by repeated human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) (n = 20), (ii) early follicular phase cessation of GnRHa without luteal support (n = 20), and (iii) a long GnRHa protocol without luteal support (n = 20). Frequent ultrasound and blood sampling was performed during the entire IVF cycle. Forty normo-ovulatory women served as controls. No premature LH surges were found after early cessation of GnRHa. In this group, some pituitary recovery occurred during the late luteal phase, but this did not affect corpus luteum function. Progesterone concentrations were shown to be dependent on disappearance of the pre-ovulatory bolus of HCG. Pregnancies occurred in all three groups. In conclusion, early follicular phase cessation of GnRHa is still effective in the prevention of a premature rise in LH. Although some pituitary recovery was observed thereafter, corpus luteum function is still abnormal due to early luteolysis.     

The effect of luteal support with human chorionic gonadotrophin or progesterone on the daily progesterone profile after different types of ovarian stimulation.

Attempts have been made to increase the low pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles by luteal phase support with progesterone or human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). Previously, this practice has been inconsistent and the results unclear. The detailed effect of support on the progesterone profile in the luteal phase was assessed by daily salivary progesterone measurements in non-conception IVF cycles. The comparison of HCG and progesterone support in two different stimulation protocols showed that the profile of luteal progesterone concentrations was similar in control cycles and those supported with a vaginal progesterone suppository, showing an early decrease by the fourth luteal day. In cycles supported with multiple doses of HCG, the progesterone profile was normal but slightly increased up to the 9th luteal day subsequently falling to basal levels by the fourteenth luteal day.     

Cultured human granulosa cells as a model for corpus luteum function: relative roles of gonadotrophin and low density lipoprotein studied under defined culture conditions.

In primates, corpus luteum development involves both gonadotrophin stimulation and exposure to low density lipoprotein (LDL) delivered through vascularization of the granulosa cell-derived layer. These regulatory influences were modelled in vitro using granulosa cells obtained during in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles controlled with gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue, human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG). Granulosa cells were cultured in defined medium on extracellular matrix. Without gonadotrophin or LDL in the medium, progesterone production declined progressively. With LDL alone, there was a short-lived elevation of progesterone output which subsequently declined. Culture with HCG alone resulted in a relatively unchanged rate of steroid production over 5 days despite morphological development. This contrasted with a marked and sustained increase in progesterone output over the same time when granulosa cells were cultured with combined HCG/LDL. Cultures were challenged with combined HCG/LDL on day 5. Where initial incubation included HCG, the challenge resulted in a recovery of progesterone output to values comparable to those of granulosa cells exposed to continuous HCG/LDL. Initial incubation without gonadotrophin led to a reduced response. Results suggest that LDL delivery to granulosa cells of the early corpus luteum causes a short-lived period of progesterone production. Sustained luteinization of granulosa cells and maintenance of gonadotrophin responsiveness requires continued exposure to gonadotrophin in the luteal phase.     

Is there a difference in the function of granulosa-luteal cells in patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization either with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist?

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) regulates gonadotrophin release. It has been shown that GnRH may have a direct effect on the ovary, as the addition of GnRH to granulosa cell cultures inhibits the production of progesterone and oestradiol. Specific GnRH receptors have been found to be present in rat and human granulosa cells. Desensitization of the pituitary by GnRH agonist has become common in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, usually by a long protocol of 2-3 weeks. With the introduction of GnRH antagonists, which produce an immediate blockage of the GnRH receptors, a much shorter exposure is needed of 3-6 days. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a GnRH agonist (buserelin) and a GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) on the function of granulosa cells cultured in vitro from IVF patients. Women were treated by IVF randomized either to have buserelin nasal spray from the luteal phase in the previous cycle or cetrorelix from day 6 of the cycle. Both groups had ovarian stimulation with human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) 150 IU daily, i.e. HCG was administered when the follicles were larger than 17 mm, and aspirated 36 h later. Granulosa cells, separated and washed from large follicles containing ova, were pooled. After 48 h of pre-incubation, the granulosa cells were cultured for 4 days in medium with either added testosterone or cAMP with or without HCG, with change of medium after 2 days. The progesterone and oestradiol concentrations in the culture medium were measured by immunological assay, and cellular protein was measured by microprotein assay. The results showed that granulosa cells from women treated with GnRH antagonist (cetrorelix) responded earlier to the in-vitro hormone stimulation in terms of progesterone accumulation than women treated with the GnRH agonist (buserelin). This may have been due to difference in time of exposure to the analogue. The results may indicate that the luteal function is less impaired in GnRH antagonist treatment than in GnRH agonist treatment.     

Endocrinology: Progesterone alone versus progesterone combined with HCG as luteal support in GnRHa/HMG induced IVF cycles: a randomized clinical trial

Two different regimens of luteal support in gonadotrophin hormone-releasinghormone (GnRH) analoguefhuman menopausal gonadotrophin (GnRHa/HMG)-inducedin-vitro fertilization cycles (IVF) were compared in a randomizedclinical trial. After embryo transfer, either vaginal progesteronealone was administered (n=89, P group), or a combination ofvaginal progesterone and human chorionic gonadotrophin (n=87,P/HCG group). The primary aim of this study was to assess theeffect of the different regimens of luteal support on the pregnancyrate. The secondary aim was to compare oestradiol and progesteroneconcentrations in the luteal phase between the two groups, andassess their effect on the pregnancy rate. A clinical pregnancyrate of 15% was found in the P/HCG group in comparison with26% in the P group (odds ratio 0.49; 99% confidence interval:0.18–1.3). The luteal serum oestradiol and progesteronevalues in the P/HCG group were significantly higher when comparedwith the P group on the 6th, 9th and 12th day after oocyte retrieval(Wilcoxon P<0.001). In accordance with the high oestradiolconcentrations, more cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome(OHSS) were found in the P/HCG group. Oestradiol values on the9th day after oocyte retrieval, presumably the day of implantation,appeared to be higher in women who did not become clinicallypregnant. We conclude that vaginal progesterone alone providessufficient luteal support in GnRHa/HMG induced IVF cycles. Thecombination of vaginal progesterone and HCG as luteal supportleads to significant high luteal oestradiol and progesteroneconcentrations. But a high concentration of oestradiol seemsto have a deleterious effect on the implantation process, resultingin a low pregnancy rate.     

Human chorionic gonadotrophin luteal support overcomes luteal phase inadequacy after gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist-induced ovulation in gonadotrophin-stimulated cycles

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa)-induced ovulation after gonadotrophin ovarian stimulation is used to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and multiple pregnancy in polyfollicular cycles. However, one of the major problems to be resolved is corpus luteum function after follicular maturation and ovulation by mid-cycle GnRHa administration. The present report investigated the luteal phase in non-conceptual polyfollicular cycles in 26 patients (group 1) receiving a single dose of 0.5 mg leuprolide acetate to induce ovulation and in a control group of patients (n = 26) (group 2) who were given human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) (10,000 IU i.m.) for ovulation induction. All of them were normal ovulatory women undergoing gonadotrophin ovarian stimulation because of unexplained infertility or male factor. In both groups of patients two doses of 2500 IU HCG i.m. were given 6 and 10 days after the ovulatory dose of HCG or GnRHa to support the luteal phase. All cycles were ovulatory as shown by mid- luteal serum progesterone concentrations >10 ng/ml. Mean serum progesterone concentrations were 62% higher in group 2 than in group 1, but this difference was not statistically significant. The mean length of the luteal phase was similar in groups 1 and 2. It is concluded that HCG luteal support is a useful tool to overcome the luteal phase inadequacy that characterizes GnRHa-triggered cycles after gonadotrophin stimulation.