Late outcome of mitral valve surgery for patients with coronary artery disease

BACKGROUND: We plan to determine whether the cause of mitral valve regurgitation, ischemic or degenerative, affects survival after combined mitral valve repair or replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery and to assess the influence of residual mitral regurgitation on late outcome. METHODS: A retrospective study was made of 302 patients having mitral valve repair or replacement and CABG from January 1987 through December 1996. Risk factors for death, for development of New York Heart Association class III or IV congestive heart failure (CHF), and recurrent mitral valve regurgitation were identified by proportional hazards analysis. RESULTS: The cause of mitral regurgitation was ischemic in 137 patients (45%) and degenerative in 165 patients (55%). Valve replacement was performed in 51 patients (17%) and valve repair in 251 patients (83%). Median follow-up was 64 months. Ten-year actuarial survival rates were 33% (95% confidence interval: 22% to 47%) in the ischemic group and 52% (95% confidence interval: 42% to 64%) in the degenerative group. Univariate predictors of death, were entered into a multivariate model. Older age, ejection fraction of 35% or less, three-vessel coronary artery disease, replacement of the mitral valve, and residual mitral regurgitation at dismissal were independent risk factors for death. The cause of mitral valve regurgitation (ischemic or degenerative) was not an independent predictor of long-term survival, class III or IV CHF, or recurrent regurgitation. CONCLUSIONS: Survival after mitral valve surgery and CABG is determined by the extent of coronary disease and ventricular dysfunction and by the success of the valve procedure; etiology of mitral valve regurgitation has relatively little impact on late outcome.     

Surgical results for mitral regurgitation from coronary artery disease

Results of coronary artery bypass grafting with and without mitral valve replacement were analyzed retrospectively in 101 patients with preoperative ischemic mitral regurgitation to determine the effects of severity and surgical treatment of mitral regurgitation on survival. Between 1980 and 1984, a total of 1,475 patients (mean age 59, 77% male) underwent coronary bypass. These patients were divided into three groups: (1) patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent isolated coronary bypass (1,374; 93%), (2) patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent isolated coronary bypass without valve replacement (85; 6%), and (3) patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent combined mitral valve replacement and coronary bypass (16; 1%). Preoperatively, patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation compared to those without regurgitation were significantly older (+6 years, p less than 0.001), had more severe coronary artery disease (p less than 0.001), a higher incidence of congestive heart failure (24% versus 5%, p less than 0.001) and recent myocardial infarction (16% versus 8%, p less than 0.01), and a lower mean ejection fraction (45% versus 61%, p less than 0.001). Operative mortality was significantly increased in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation who underwent coronary bypass alone (p less than 0.01) and in those who underwent coronary bypass and mitral valve replacement (p less than 0.01)--11% and 19%, respectively--than in the coronary bypass patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation (3.7%). The severity of mitral regurgitation (0 to 4+) proved to be the most significant predictor of operative mortality. The actuarial survival rate at 5 years for the coronary bypass patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation was 85% compared to 91% (p less than 0.05) for the coronary bypass patients without ischemic mitral regurgitation. These results indicate that patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation have a higher prevalence of cardiac risk factors and are at an increased risk of operative mortality. Although the severity of the ischemic mitral regurgitation was strongly predictive of early survival, it proved to have an unexpectedly modest effect on long-term survival after surgical treatment.     

Mitral regurgitation after myocardial infarction. Coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve replacement with chordae preservation.

A patient with acute ischemic mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction required emergency coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve replacement with chordae preservation. For severe mitral regurgitation and heart failure due to myocardial infarction and ischemic papillary muscle dysfunction, mitral valve replacement with chordae preservation was effective. Here, we discuss the etiology of ischemic mitral regurgitation and the operative method for valve repair or replacement.     

Mitral regurgitation after myocardial infarction

A patient with acute ischemic mitral regurgitation after acute myocardial infarction required emergency coronary artery bypass grafting and mitral valve replacement with chordae preservation. For severe mitral regurgitation and heart failure due to myocardial infarction and ischemic papillary muscle dysfunction, mitral valve replacement with chordae preservation was effective. Here, we discuss the etiology of ischemic mitral regurgitation and the operative method for valve repair or replacement.     

Mitral valve replacement combined with coronary artery operation: determinants of early and late results

Mitral valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting has been reported as being associated with a higher mortality than either mitral valve replacement or coronary artery bypass grafting alone. Cause of mitral valve disease and severity of mitral regurgitation have been reported as related to mortality. To study the correlation of the cause of mitral valve disease and severity of mitral regurgitation to hospital mortality and long-term survival, we analyzed the results of 135 patients undergoing mitral valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting between June 1974 and August 1989. The hospital mortality was 11.8% (16/135). Fifteen preoperative and operative variables were tested for correlation with hospital or late mortality using univariate tests and multivariate regression. Advanced age (greater than 60 years), New York Heart Association functional class, and wall motion score were independently associated with hospital mortality (p less than 0.05). The cause of mitral valve disease and severity of mitral regurgitation were not related to hospital mortality or long-term survival (p greater than 0.05). The follow-up rate was 96.6% for the hospital survivors (115/119). Mean follow-up was 52.6 +/- 4.1 months. There were 35 late deaths. Survival was 91.9%, 89.9%, 78%, and 49.9% at 1, 2, 5, and 10 postoperative years, respectively. Preoperative New York Heart Association functional class and use of catecholamines during the postoperative intensive care period were independently related to late survival (p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Combined valve replacement and myocardial revascularization

Combining valve replacement with coronary artery bypass (CABG) for significant concomitant disease remains a controversial subject. To determine the operative results following combined valve replacement and CABG, we evaluated 201 patients seen consecutively between July 1977 and June 1982. CABG for vessels with greater than 70% stenosis was performed with aortic valve replacement in 106 patients, with mitral valve replacement in 82, and with aortic and mitral valve replacement in 13. There were 143 men and 58 women; the mean age was 67 years. Nine operative deaths (8.5%) occurred with aortic valve replacement and CABG: 5 of 25 (20%) when cardioplegia was not used and 4 of 81 (4.9%) with cardioplegia (p less than 0.01). The operative mortality rate for isolated aortic valve replacement without coronary disease during the same period was 5.9% (10 of 168). The late actuarial survival rate is similar for aortic valve replacement alone or aortic valve replacement and CABG. There were no operative deaths among patients having undergone aortic and mitral valve replacement and CABG; the rate was 15% (9 of 60) in patients having undergone aortic and mitral replacement and CABG. The operative mortality rate was 21.9% for mitral valve replacement and CABG (18 of 82). Rheumatic disease was present in 14 of these patients, two of whom had early deaths (14.3%), both after repeat mitral operations; 11 mitral valve replacements and CABG were done for degenerative mitral regurgitation with no deaths, and the remaining 57 patients had ischemic mitral regurgitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Treatment of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease by coronary bypass alone: late results.

BACKGROUND: In cases of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary artery disease operative strategy continues to be debated between coronary artery bypass grafting alone and concomitant valve replacement or repair. We previously reported on 58 patients with moderate mitral regurgitation who had coronary artery bypass grafting between 1977 and 1983. We present the late results for this original cohort (test group), and a matched control group of coronary artery bypass grafting patients without mitral regurgitation (n = 58). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the original cohort, the hospital mortality rate was 3.4% (2 of 58), and 80.4% (45 of 56) of hospital survivors were alive at the time of initial follow-up (mean, 4.3+/-2.3 years). Hospital mortality in the control group was 6.9% (4 of 58 patients). Follow-up was 98.2% (108 of 110 patients) complete, with a mean follow-up time of 10.3+/-5.5 years. Kaplan-Meier curves for hospital survivors showed similar 5- and 10-year survival rates between the two groups (p = 0.59). On multivariate analysis, age 65 years or more, congestive heart failure class III or IV, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure more than 17 mm Hg were significant (p < 0.05) independent predictors of diminished survival in the test group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary artery disease treated solely with coronary artery bypass grafting had acceptable early and late results. Moderate mitral regurgitation at the time of revascularization does not always warrant operative correction.     

Determinants of survival after surgery for mitral valve regurgitation in patients with and without coronary artery disease

Mortality and its determinants were assessed in 181 consecutive patients undergoing primary mitral valve surgery for pure mitral regurgitation with coronary artery disease (MR + CAD, 79 patients) or without (MR no CAD, 102 patients). Early mortality (C10% vs. 3%) and 6-year estimate of survival (55% +/- 7.1% vs. 82% +/- 4.4%) were significantly different. Mortality was not significantly different in patients with CAD + MR of an ischemic (49 patients) or a non-ischemic etiology (30 patients). Multivariate testing using Cox regression models of overall mortality in patients with MR + CAD indicated that preoperative renal dysfunction, high right atrial pressure, ejection fraction less than 45% as well as qualitatively reduced left ventricular function and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index greater than 120 ml/m2 are associated with decreased survival. Multivariate testing in patients with MR no CAD only identified insertion of a mechanical prosthesis and a degenerative etiology of mitral valve disease as independent predictors of survival. Thus, a common denominator of preoperative pathology (renal dysfunction) and indices of right and left ventricular dysfunction determined overall survival of patients with MR + CAD. Survival of patients with MR no CAD was determined by the valve prosthesis and the etiology of valve disease.     

Ischemic mitral regurgitation: intraventricular papillary muscle imbrication without mitral ring during left ventricular restoration

OBJECTIVES: Functional mitral regurgitation in ischemic cardiomyopathy carries a poor prognosis, and its surgical management remains problematic and controversial. The aim of this study was to report the results of our surgical approach to patients who have had myocardial infarctions and have ventricular dilatation, mitral regurgitation, reduced pump function, pulmonary hypertension and coronary artery disease. This surgical approach consists of endoventricular mitral repair without prosthetic ring, ventricular reconstruction with or without patch, and coronary artery bypass grafting. PATIENTS: Forty-six patients (aged 64 +/- 10 years) with previous anterior transmural myocardial infarction and mitral regurgitation comprised the study group. Indication for surgery was heart failure in 93% of cases; 25 patients were in New York Heart Association functional class IV and 17 were in class III. Mitral regurgitation was moderate to severe in 32 cases (69%). RESULTS: All patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, with a mean of 3.2 +/- 1.3 grafts. Associated aortic valve replacement was performed in 4 cases. Global operative mortality rate was 15.2%. End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes significantly decreased after surgery (from 140 +/- 40 to 98 +/- 36 mL/m(2) and from 98 +/- 32 to 63 +/- 22 mL/m(2), respectively, P =.001). Systolic pulmonary pressure decreased significantly (from 55 +/- 13 to 43 +/- 16 mm Hg, P =.001). Ejection fraction did not change significantly. Postoperative mitral regurgitation was absent or minimal in 84% of cases; 1 patient had severe mitral regurgitation necessitating valve replacement. New York Heart Association functional class significantly improved. The mean preoperative functional class was 3.4 +/- 0.6 (median 3, range 2-4); after the operation, this decreased to 1.9 +/- 0.7 (median 2, range 1-3, P <.001). Cumulative survival at a 30-month follow-up was 63%. CONCLUSIONS: Our aggressive, combined surgical approach is aimed at correcting the three components of ischemic cardiomyopathy: relieving ischemia, reducing left ventricular wall tension by decreasing left ventricular volumes, and reducing volume overload and pulmonary hypertension by repairing the mitral valve. Despite a relatively high perioperative mortality rate, surviving patients benefitted from the operation, with improved clinical functional class and thus quality of life.     

Aortic valve replacement in patients with impaired ventricular function

BACKGROUND: Patients with reduced ventricular function undergoing aortic valve replacement have increased operative risks, but the impact of valvular pathophysiology and other risk factors has not been clearly defined. METHODS: From June 1992 through June 2002, 1,402 consecutive patients underwent isolated aortic valve surgery with or without coronary artery bypass grafting; of these patients, 416 had an ejection fraction less than 40% and are the subject of this report. These patients (mean age, 68.6) had severe stenosis (62.5%), severe regurgitation (30.3%), or mixed disease (7.2%). Aortic valve replacement plus coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 48.4% of patients, and 27% had previous cardiac surgery. Follow-up included echocardiography and survival analysis. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 10.1% (42 of 416), with no difference between aortic stenosis (9.6%) and regurgitation (11.1%). Multivariate analysis revealed that age (p = 0.002) and renal disease (odds ratio = 4.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.9 to 9.3; p = 0.001) were independently associated predictors of mortality. Valvular pathophysiology had no impact on mortality. Peripheral vascular disease, multivessel coronary disease, and renal disease were associated risks for any postoperative complication. Peripheral vascular disease (odds ratio = 12.3, p = 0.02), history of cerebrovascular disease (odds ratio = 4.8, p = 0.038), and diabetes (odds ratio = 2.7, p = 0.04) were associated risks for stroke. The ejection fraction was more than 40% in 52% of the patients who had postoperative echocardiography (mean follow-up, 6 months). Actuarial survival revealed no difference between pathophysiologic groups. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve surgery in patients with impaired ventricular function carries an acceptable operative risk that can be stratified by age and comorbidities. The type of valvular pathophysiology does not significantly affect mortality.     

Comparative morbidity of mitral valve repair versus replacement for mitral regurgitation with and without coronary artery disease

Mitral valve repair has been increasingly used at our hospital for mitral regurgitation with and without coronary disease. From January, 1984, to June, 1987, of 338 patients undergoing all forms of mitral valve surgery, 140 had first-time surgery for pure mitral regurgitation: 75 had valve repair, and 65 had valve replacement. Thirty-three of 75 (44%) had concomitant coronary bypass in the repair group, while 21 of 65 (32%) had coronary bypass in the replacement group. The mean functional class (3.4 versus 3.5), age (60 versus 61 years), and preoperative hemodynamics were similar in both groups. The cause of mitral regurgitation in the repair group was myxomatous change in 32 patients, ischemia in 27, rheumatic valve disease in 12, and endocarditis in 4. A Carpentier ring was used in 46, a Duran ring was used in 11, and none was used in 18. The operative mortality was 3 of 75 patients (4%) in the repair group, all with coronary artery bypass grafting, versus 2 of 65 patients (3%) in the replacement group, 1 of whom had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting. The mean postoperative functional class 15 months postoperatively was 1.12 in the repair group versus 1.15 in the replacement group. There were 7 late deaths in the replacement group and only 3 late deaths in the repair group. Actuarial survival at 30 months was 85 +/- 6% for the replacement group and 94 +/- 4% for the repair group. There were 5 late emboli (1 fatal, 4 nonfatal) after valve replacement and none after valve repair (p = 0.03).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Beating heart surgery for ischemic mitral regurgitation: report of a case

A 51-year-old man was admitted to our hospital because of dyspnea. Coronary angiography revealed triple vessel disease and echocardiography demonstrated severe mitral regurgitation with poor left ventricular function. Under a diagnosis of ischemic mitral regurgitation, on-pump beating mitral annuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting using the normothermic retrograde continuous coronary sinus perfusion of oxygenated blood was performed in order to prevent reperfusion injury. The patient was easily weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass and his postoperative course was uneventful. Because of the advantages of this procedure (e.g., no reperfusion injury, testing of the mitral valve repair is done in real physiologic conditions with beating tonus), on-pump beating heart surgery seems a good surgical option for ischemic mitral regurgitation with poor left ventricular function.     

Long-term outcome after mitral valve repair

BACKGROUND: Several studies reported excellent long-term results after mitral valve repair for regurgitation, however a number of patients still experience recurrent mitral valve regurgitation which requires reoperation. We have evaluated the long-term outcome of a consecutive series of patients who underwent mitral valve repair for regurgitation in an attempt to identify the risk factors associated with late failures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One-hundred and sixty-four patients underwent mitral valve repair for ischemic and degenerative mitral valve regurgitation. Seventy-two patients underwent echocardiographic evaluation a median of 5.6 years after surgery. RESULTS: Ten-year survival freedom from any fatal cardiac event was 75.9% and survival freedom from redo mitral valve surgery was 93.8%. Multivariable analysis showed that residual mitral valve regurgitation grade>1 as assessed during the immediate postoperative period (at 10-year, 60.6% vs. 95.7%, p=0.001, RR 20.7, 95%C.I. 3.4-125.3) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma (at 10-year 66.8% vs. 95.2%, p=0.013, RR 12.0, 95%C.I. 1.7-85.2) were predictors of redo mitral valve surgery. The same findings were observed also among patients with myxomatous degenerative disease. At echocardiographic follow-up, no significant improvement was detected in terms of left ventricular ejection fraction, whilst mitral valve regurgitation grade (median, 3 to 1), New York Heart Association class (median, 2 to 1) and left atrium diameter (median, 50 to 44 mm) decreased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the excellent clinical long-term results after mitral valve repair. An adequate repair technique is advocated in order to decrease the immediate postoperative rate of residual regurgitation>1 as this is a main determinant of late failures requiring redo mitral valve surgery. Further studies are required to better define the possible causative role of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and any underlying connective tissue metabolic disorder in late failures after mitral valve repair.     

Does the additive risk of mitral valve repair in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy prohibit surgical intervention?

OBJECTIVE: To assess the surgical risk of additional mitral valve repairs in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Severe mitral regurgitation in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy increases the death rate and symptomatic status. The 1-year survival rate for medical therapy in this subset of patients is less than 20%. Transplantation is usually not feasible because of donor shortage and death while on the waiting list. METHODS: To assess additive risk, a retrospective chart review from 1993 to 1998 was performed comparing patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ejection fraction [EF] <25%) and severe mitral regurgitation undergoing mitral valve repair and coronary artery bypass graft operations with patients with an EF of <25% undergoing coronary artery bypass graft alone. These groups were also compared with 140 patients receiving heart transplants since 1993 (group 3). RESULTS: The overall hospital death rate for group 1 was 6.3%. The one death occurred 2 weeks after surgery secondary to sepsis. This was not significantly different from the death rate of 4.1% in group 2. In group 1, there were two deaths at 1 year (87% survival rate), one related to heart failure. One patient was New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV at 1 year; the remainder of patients were NYHA class I-II. These results were not significantly different than the 8% death rate noted with transplantation. There was no change in EF and minimal residual mitral regurgitation in group 1 based on postoperative transesophageal echocardiography, whereas group 2 had an average 11.7% improvement in EF. CONCLUSIONS: Previously, severe mitral regurgitation in the setting of ischemic cardiomyopathy has been associated with poor survival. In these authors' experience, repairing the mitral valve along with coronary artery bypass grafting does not increase the surgical risk, yields improvement in symptomatic status, and compares favorably to coronary artery bypass grafting alone and cardiac transplantation. However, the lack of change in EF in these patients probably represents an overestimation of the EF before surgery secondary to severe mitral regurgitation.     

The results of valve replacement for mitral valve prolapse

Between January, 1975, and December, 1982, 33 patients underwent mitral valve replacement for mitral valve prolapse secondary to myxomatous degeneration. The majority were in the seventh decade of life (median age, 62 years), and all were seen with symptoms of mitral regurgitation. Echocardiography was more accurate in making the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse more often (75%) than angiography (66%). Thirty-eight percent of the patients who underwent cineangiography had concomitant coronary artery disease and had coronary artery bypass grafting as well as mitral valve replacement. There was 1 operative death, an operative mortality of 3%. There were 6 late deaths, a late mortality of 18%. Of the 26 long-term survivors, 23 (88%) were in New York Heart Association Functional Class I and 3 (12%) were in Class II. The average length of follow-up was 33.25 months, and the 5-year actuarial survival was 76%. There was only one incident of thromboembolism (3%). Short-term and long-term survival were not related to the severity of mitral regurgitation but to the status of the left ventricle and the overall condition of the patient. These data suggest that older patients with severe mitral regurgitation secondary to mitral valve prolapse can undergo valve replacement with low operative mortality and gratifying long-term results.     

Surgical treatment of ischemic mitral valve regurgitation.

In cases of old myocardial infarction, the presence of mitral valve regurgitation is one of the predicting factors of long-term prognosis. The mechanism of ischemic mitral regurgitation consists of mitral annular dilatation, left ventricular (LV) dilatation followed by tethering of the mitral valve, etc. Since long-term prognosis of the patients in whom the degree of mitral valve regurgitation is 2+ or more is typically poor, the mitral valve procedure should be considered at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or more. In this type of surgery, the treatment essentially involves the use of an artificial ring implantation as the basic technique. In the chronic stage, a significant degree of mitral regurgitation persists in approximately 20% of the cases if they have been treated by ring annuloplasty alone. Additional surgical procedures that reduce or eradicate the tethering are essential for the control of the regurgitation completely in cases with strong tethering. We recently employed two new surgical techniques, namely, cutting the secondary chordae to the anterior mitral valve leaflet and the anterior and posterior papillary muscle reapproximation. The surgical results of the acute phase appear to be promising; however, the long-term results of such new methods are yet to be determined. If the mitral valve regurgitation cannot be controlled even by various operative techniques of mitral valve repair, mitral valve replacement should be considered. This is because the long-term survival rate of the suboptimal repair surgical patients is lower when compared with that of mitral valve replacement patients.     

Combined mitral valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting through a left thoracotomy after retrosternal oesophageal reconstruction

A 74-year-old man with a history of retrosternal oesophageal reconstruction was referred for surgical treatment of mitral valve regurgitation and coronary artery disease. He underwent mitral valve replacement combined with coronary artery bypass grafting through a left thoracotomy. Combined mitral valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting through a left thoracotomy were feasible in this patient with a retrosternal neo-oesophageal conduit.     

Surgical treatment of ischaemic valve disease

Mitral valve regurgitation secondary to ischaemic heart disease carries a significant mortality even after open-heart surgery. In this study, 21 patients with mitral regurgitation associated with ischaemic heart disease were evaluated with respect to valvular pathology. Pathological examination of the mitral valve revealed chorda elongation or rupture in seven patients (group 1), papillary muscle dysfunction in 10 (group 2), and papillary muscle rupture in four (group 3). Significant preoperative characteristics in each group were subacute haemodynamic deterioration in group 1, chronic severe left ventricular failure in group 2, and a high incidence of acute renal failure associated with haemodynamic shock in group 3. Mitral valve plasty was performed in six patients and mitral valve replacement, using the St Jude Medical valve, in 15. Fourteen patients underwent mitral valve surgery combined with coronary artery bypass grafting. Mitral plasty was applied to the patients with low left ventricular function with mean(s.d.) fraction shortening of 19.2(6.2)% compared with 30.2(8.4)% in patients with mitral valve replacement. There were no operative deaths. Of four late deaths, two in group 1 resulted from infection and myocardial infarction, respectively, and one in group 2 resulted from arrhythmia. One patient in group 3 died from renal failure. It is suggested that incorporation of these therapeutic concepts may lead to satisfactory results in the surgical treatment of ischaemic mitral regurgitation.     

Combined mitral valve and coronary artery surgery: ischemic versus non-ischemic mitral valve disease.

OBJECTIVES: Mitral valve combined with coronary artery surgery is associated with a higher hospital mortality than each operation in particular. Controversy exists regarding the predictive value of ischemic mitral valve disease (MVD) on outcome. METHODS: Between 1984 and 1997, 262 patients underwent mitral valve operations (replacement, n = 198; repair, n = 64) in combination with coronary revascularization. The etiology of MVD was secondary to ischemic heart disease (group I) in 82 (31%) patients, and non-ischemic (group II) in 180 (69%) patients (rheumatic, 139 patients (53%); degenerative, 41 patients (16%)). Both groups were similar in age, cardiac risk factors and pulmonary artery pressure. Patients of group I had significantly more severe coronary artery disease, more often an impaired left ventricle and myocardial infarction, and were in a worse functional condition. The mean number of bypass grafts was significantly higher in group I. The follow-up was 98% (230/234 patients). RESULTS: With 19.5%, the hospital mortality was significantly increased in group I compared with 6.7% in group II (P = 0.002; overall, 10.7%). Mitral valve repair or replacement had no influence on early outcome, although mitral valve repair was performed more often in group I (37 versus 19%). The survival (valve-related event-free survival) after discharge from hospital in the 1st, 5th and 10th year was 94 (94%), 70 (66%) and 53% (35%) in group I and 96 (95%), 79 (76%) and 54% (41%) in group II, respectively. The long-term functional capacity was equally good in both groups (New York Heart Association mean, 1.86 versus 1.72). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ischemic MVD are in a worse cardiac condition with significantly higher hospital mortality than patients with non-ischemic MVD and coronary artery bypass grafting. Once discharged from hospital, both groups have comparable long-term outcomes, with the best results in patients with degenerative MVD.     

On pump beating heart mitral valve repair without aortic cross-clamp for low ejection fraction ischemic mitral regurgitation after coronary artery bypass grafting; report of a case

A 59-year-old male with congestive heart failure caused by impaired left ventricular function after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) was referred to our hospital, and massive ischemic mitral regurgitation was detected by echocardiography. This patient underwent on-pump beating-heart mitral valve repair without aortic cross-clamp successfully through right thoracotomy. Postoperative echocardiography revealed no mitral regurgitation. The patient recovered uneventfully and was discharged on the 17th postoperative day. At 6th month after the operation, he is well without mitral regurgitation.