Local care and medical treatment for ischemic diabetic ulcers

Optimal medical treatment of ischemic diabetic ulcers is multifactorial. Infection is very common and it is necessary to distinguish between limb or life threatening infections and non-limb-threatening infections. The major pathogen associated with non-limb-threatening infection is staphylococcus aureus; oral antibiotics such as amoxicillin/clavulanate or clindamycin can be used. For severe infection, empiric antibiotic therapy is broader-spectrum covering staphylococci, streptococci, gram-negative bacilli and enterococci; intravenous administration is the rule. Duration of antibiotic therapy depends on severity and depth of infection, and on requirement of surgical debridment. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is a growth factor stimulating proliferation and function of neutrophils. As an adjunctive therapy for limb-threatening infections, it is associated with a lower rate of amputation. Increasing arterial perfusion if the patient is unsuitable for reconstructive surgery or angioplasty is desirable. Iloprost is an analogue of epoprostenol with effects on platelet aggregability and vasodilatation. It improves ulcer healing, decreases pain, slightly diminishes the rate of amputation. Systemic hyperbaric oxygen therapy can perhaps improve clinical outcome but additional research is needed to define the specific indications and benefits of this treatment modality. Local care is not rationalized and depends on local habits. Debridment is required. Non necrotic wounds can be covered by modern dressing (hydrophilic dressing, alginates, hydrocolloid). Necrotic wounds are dryed until surgical revascularization, or excised if they are limited and superficial. Pinch grafts are very useful for arterial ulcers. The place of topical growth factor like PDGF (platelet derived growth factor) and of living skin equivalents (dermagraft, apligraf) is not defined in ischaemic diabetic ulcers. Treatment of edema is necessary, because it retards or complicates healing. Inelastic bandages can be useful with good tolerance if ischemia is not critical. Pneumatic foot compression is under evaluation. Electric stimulation could be an adjuncting treatment, but with a problem of compliance. Reducing plantar pressure is always necessary.     

Antimicrobial Resistance and Aging: Beginning of the End of the Antibiotic Era?

Throughout the history of mankind, infectious diseases have remained a major cause of death and disability. Although industrialized nations, such as the United States, have experienced significant reductions in infection-related mortality and morbidity since the beginning of the "antibiotic era," death and complications from infectious diseases remain a serious problem for older persons. Pneumonia is the major infection-related cause of death in older persons, and urinary tract infection is the most common bacterial infection seen in geriatric patients. Other serious and common infections in older people include intra-abdominal sepsis, bacterial meningitis, infective endocarditis, infected pressure ulcers, septic arthritis, tuberculosis, and herpes zoster. As a consequence, frequent prescribing of antibiotics for older patients is common practice. The large volume of antibiotics prescribed has contributed to the emergence of highly resistant pathogens among geriatric patients, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae , vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and multiple-drug-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Unless preventive strategies coupled with newer drug development are established soon, eventually clinicians will be encountering infections caused by highly resistant pathogens for which no effective antibiotics will be available. Clinicians could then be experiencing the same frustrations of not being able to treat infections effectively as were seen in the "pre-antibiotic era."     

Outpatient management of uncomplicated lower-extremity infections in diabetic patients

Most diabetic foot infections are believed to be caused by both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and to require hospitalization and parenteral antimicrobial therapy. We prospectively evaluated diabetic patients with non-limb-threatening lower-extremity infections not yet treated with antibiotics. The patients were randomized to outpatient treatment with oral clindamycin hydrochloride or cephalexin for 2 weeks and evaluated every 3 to 7 days. In 56 assessable patients, curettage yielded a mean of 2.1 microorganisms. Aerobic gram-positive cocci were isolated in 50 cases (89%), and were the sole pathogen in 21 (42%) of these. Aerobic gram-negative bacilli and anaerobes were isolated in 20 (36%) and 7 (13%) cases, respectively, and almost always in polymicrobial infections. Fifty-one infections (91%) were eradicated, 42 (75%) after 2 weeks of treatment; only 5 (9%) were initially treatment failures, and 3 (5%) were subsequently cured with further outpatient oral antibiotic treatment. After a mean follow-up of 15 months, no further treatment was required in 43 (84%) of the cured patients. Previously untreated lower-extremity infections in diabetic patients are usually caused by aerobic gram-positive cocci, and generally respond well to outpatient management with oral antibiotic therapy.     

Therapy with newer oral beta-lactam and quinolone agents for infections of the skin and skin structures: a review.

Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefuroxime axetil, ciprofloxacin, and ofloxacin are each effective against many bacteria that cause infections in the skin and skin structures. Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid is potent against staphylococci, streptococci (including enterococci), and anaerobes, although adverse gastrointestinal reactions are common. Cefuroxime axetil is similarly effective yet is used only rarely because of its more common use in infections of the respiratory tract and the prevalent use of second-generation cephalosporins in surgical prophylaxis. The newer quinolones ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin are effective against staphylococci, Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa and exhibit only low toxicity; these agents have been used in many difficult tissue infections--notably, chronic infected ulcers in diabetic patients. Oral antimicrobial therapy, when chosen on the basis of culture and susceptibility results and combined with surgical debridement and local management, may be effective for many problematic infections of the skin and skin structures heretofore treated with parenteral antibiotics.     

From Ulcer to Infection: An Update on Clinical Practice and Adjunctive Treatments of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Foot ulcers are a common complication of diabetes. A fifth of all individuals with diabetes develop a diabetic foot infection and are hospitalized at least once in their lifetime. Standard of care for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers and subsequent infection involves a multimodal, interdisciplinary team approach that includes wound care, systemic antimicrobials, and surgery. However, with the relatively poor outcome for chronic, longstanding ulcers and severe infections, recent research has focused on adjunctive therapies to promote wound healing and repair. This review summarizes the underlying pathology and classification of diabetic ulcers and focuses on recent advances that have important implications for the use of adjunctive therapy for diabetic foot infections.     

Helicobacter pylori-negative peptic ulcer. What is its aetiopathogenesis and treatment?

Although the vast majority of peptic ulcers are widely considered as related to the germ Helicobacter pylori, ulcers exhibiting absence of this infection are increasingly seen in recent years. This fact has been partly related to a decreased prevalence of Helicobacter pylori among the population, a consequence of improved hygiene and housing conditions. Causes in relation to Helicobacter pylori-negative ulcers are: 1. Falsely negative infection diagnostic tests. They represent 25% of ulcers considered as Helicobacter pylori-negative in health-care practice (falsely negative diagnostic test 5%, previous or concomitant therapy with antibiotics, bismuth or proton pump inhibitors 20%). 2. Aspirin (ASA) or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapy. This is no doubt the most common cause, representing 50 to 60% of all infection-free ulcers. 3. Other causes (Zollinger-Ellison syndrome, Helicobacter heilmannii, generalised gut disease such as Crohn's disease, amyloidosis, eosinophilic gastroenteritis, etc.) may be responsible for less than 5% of all Helicobacter pylori-negative ulcers. 4. "Idiopathic" peptic ulcers. Thus are considered ulcers for which no potential cause may be found, representing 5-15% of all infection-free ulcers. Acid hyper-secretion is probably an important factor in them.     

A current approach to diabetic foot infections

Foot infections are a common, complex, and serious problem in diabetic patients. Infections usually begin in foo ulcers, which are associated with neuropathy, vasculopathy, and various metabolic disturbances. These infections are potentially limb and sometimes life threatening. Etiologic agents are usually aerobic gram-positive cocci, but chronic or serious infections often contain gram-negative rods and anaerobes. Chronic infections can lead to contiguous bone infection. Diagnosing osteomyelitis may require imaging studies (especially magnetic resonance imaging) and occasionally bone biopsy. In addition to proper cleansing, debridement, and local wound care, diabetic foot infections require carefully selected antibiotic therapy. Serious infections necessitate hospitalization for initial parenteral broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, but appropriately selected patients with mild infections can be treated as outpatients with oral (or even topical) agents. Initial antibiotic selection is usually empiric; modifications may be needed based on the results of properly obtained cultures and the clinical response. Therapy should be active against staphylococci and streptococci, with broader-spectrum agents indicated if polymicrobial infection is likely. Levels of most antibiotics, except fluoroquinolones, are often subtherapeutic in infected foot tissues. The duration of therapy ranges from a week (for mild soft tissue infections) to over 6 weeks (for osteomyelitis). No single antibiotic agent or combination has proven to be optimal. With appropriate local, surgical, and antimicrobial therapy, most diabetic foot infections can now be successfully treated.     

Esophageal involvement in scleroderma: gastroesophageal reflux, the common problem

OBJECTIVES: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a multisystem disease characterized by abnormalities of small blood vessels, and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs including gastrointestinal tract. This article reviews the esophageal involvement in SSc, emphasizing the gastroesophageal reflux, which is a common problem in SSc patients. METHODS: We conducted a Medline search from 1966 to 2005. The keywords "systemic sclerosis," "esophageal involvement," "gastroesophageal reflux," "esophagitis," and "treatment" were used. RESULTS: The gastrointestinal tract is frequently affected in diffuse and limited disease. Although any part of the gastrointestinal tract can be involved, esophageal disease occurs in nearly all patients with SSc. Common esophageal manifestations in SSc include motility abnormalities and gastroesophageal reflux (GER), Barrett's esophagus, adenocarcinoma, infectious esophagitis, and drug-induced esophagitis. Common complications of GER include esophagitis with erosions and bleeding and stricture formation. Extraesophageal manifestations of GER include mouth ulcers, chronic cough, hoarse voice, sore throat, pharyngitis, laryngospasm, asthma, and recurrent pneumonia. Diagnostic procedures used in the investigation of esophageal involvement include barium esophagram, esophageal manometry, 24-hour ambulatory pH, and endoscopy. Treatment of GER in SSc includes behavioral modification and medical therapy, mainly with proton pump inhibitors. Surgical intervention has a limited role in the management of GER in selected SSc patients. CONCLUSIONS: Esophageal involvement is frequent in SSc patients. Gastroesophageal reflux may cause high morbidity. Careful examination of the patients reveals gastrointestinal abnormalities even in patients without symptoms. Appropriate treatment of esophageal involvement ameliorates symptoms and prevents complications.     

Bacteriological study of diabetic foot infections

AIMS: The polymicrobial nature of diabetic foot infection has been well documented in the literature. Patients with diabetic foot infection not exposed to antibiotics are not well studied before. The relative frequency of bacterial isolates cultured from community-acquired foot infections that are not exposed to antimicrobial agents for 30 days is studied. In addition, the bacterial comparative in vitro susceptibility to the commonly used antibacterial agents is assessed. METHODS: This is a prospective study in which the infected wounds of 86 consecutive diabetic patients seen in the diabetic foot clinic in Adan Teaching Hospital were cultured when visiting the clinic. The patients did not receive antimicrobial therapy 30 days prior to taking the cultures. The specimen was cultured using aerobic and anaerobic microbiological techniques. Isolates were tested for susceptibility to commonly used antimicrobial therapy. RESULT: Staphylococcus aureus was the most common isolate, being recovered from 38.4% of cases. Other organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.5%) and Proteus mirabilis (18%), anaerobic gram-negative organisms (10.5%), mainly Bacteroides fragilis. Imipenem, meropenem, and cefepime were the most effective agents against gram-negative organisms. Vancomycin was the most effective against gram-positive organisms. CONCLUSION: S. aureus and P. aeruginosa were the most common causes of diabetic foot infections. Anaerobic organisms are still a common cause for infection, although the prevalence is less. These wounds may require use of combined antimicrobial therapy for initial management.     

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an increasing problem in a diabetic foot clinic.

AIM: To study the prevalence of pathogenic organisms and the prevalence and outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in foot ulcers in diabetic patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of wound swabs taken from infected foot ulcers in diabetic patients, selected from an outpatient diabetic foot clinic. Seventy-five patients (79 ulcers) with positive wound swabs were included. Size of ulcer and time to healing, in particular for MRSA-infected ulcers, were measured in all patients. RESULTS: Gram-positive aerobic bacteria were the commonest micro-organism isolated (56.7%) followed by gram-negative aerobic bacteria and anaerobes (29.8% and 13.5%, respectively). Of the gram-positive aerobes, S. aureus was found most frequently and 40% were MRSA. MRSA was isolated more commonly in patients treated with antibiotics prior to the swab compared to those who had not received antibiotics (P = 0.01). Patients whose foot ulcers were infected by MRSA had longer healing time than patients whose ulcers were infected by methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (mean (range) 35.4 (19-64) and 17.8 (8-24) weeks, respectively, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: MRSA infection is common in diabetic foot ulcers and is associated with previous antibiotic treatment and prolonged time to healing. Further studies are required to assess the need for antibiotics in treating foot ulcers in diabetes and to assess the optimum therapeutic approach to this problem.     

Diabetic foot ulcers: anti-infectious strategies

Infection is a common problem in diabetic patients with foot ulcers. The diagnosis of infection is not always easy to establish, but must be made for proper therapeutic decision making. In addition to local care, search for arteriopathy and strict control of blood glucose, treatment of infected foot ulcers requires an appropriate anti-infectious strategy. We developed diagnostic and therapeutic decisional algorithms from data available in the literature in order to establish a management strategy for different clinical situations. The fundamental role of clinical assessment is underlined and the different causal microorganisms are recalled, together with the anti-microbial activity and bone concentrations of the main antibiotics used. An optimal anti-infection work-up can undoubtedly significantly reduce the number of amputations in diabetic patients.     

Coronary artery disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: A review of the literature

CONTEXT: Coronary artery occlusive disease is a common though underappreciated complication of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), typically a disease of young women. A case of a premenopausal patient with SLE and an acute myocardial infarction is presented, and the etiology and management of coronary artery disease in SLE reviewed. OBJECTIVES: To review the incidence, risk factors, pathology and treatment of coronary artery disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search of articles in English-language journals from 1980 to 2000. The index words "systemic lupus erythematosus" and the following co-indexing terms were used: "coronary artery disease," "atherosclerosis," "vasculitis," "anticardiolipin antibodies," "antiphospholipid syndrome." SELECTION SYNTHESIS AND ABSTRACTION: Papers identified were reviewed and abstracted by the authors with a presentation of a summary. RESULTS: The prevalence of coronary artery disease among women with SLE between the ages of 35 and 44 years is at least 50-fold greater than among age-matched control subjects. Of these, coronary atherosclerosis accounts for the vast majority of cases; vasculitis of the coronary arteries and other causes generally believed to be more typical of SLE are comparatively rare. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that SLE is a significant risk factor for coronary atherosclerosis independent of the classic risk factors of hypertension, tobacco use, and hyperlipidemia.     

Medical management of benign oesophageal disease in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection

Oesophageal diseases are common in human immunodeficiency virus infection, and Candida is the most frequent cause. Empiric therapy with oral antifungal therapy is cost-effective in most patients presenting with oesophageal symptoms. The "gold standard" of diagnosis, endoscopy with brushings and biopsies, is reserved for non-responders within 2 weeks. Since the use of empiric antifungal drugs, the percentage of viral and idiopathic ulcers has increased. The latter frequently recur after treatment, and have been associated with the development of oesophageal strictures. More information is needed on the role of maintenance therapy particularly for viral infections.     

A systematic audit of economic evidence linking nosocomial infections and infection control interventions: 1990-2000

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infections (NIs) are a serious patient safety issue. Infection control personnel are responsible for implementing interventions to reduce this risk. The purpose of this systematic review was to audit the published economic evidence of the attributable cost of NIs and interventions conducted by infection control professionals and to evaluate the methods used. Economic evaluation methodology and recommendations for standardization are reviewed. METHODS: A search of MEDLINE and HealthSTAR with medical subject headings or text words "nosocomial infections," "infection control," or "hospital acquired infections" cross-referenced with "costs," "cost analysis," "economics," or "cost-effectiveness analysis" was conducted. Published review articles were also searched. Inclusion criteria included articles published between 1990 and 2000 that contained an abstract and original cost estimate and were written in English. Results were standardized into a common currency. RESULTS: Fifty-five studies were eligible. Approximately one quarter examined NIs in intensive care patients (n = 13). Most studies were conducted from the hospital perspective (n = 48). The costs attributable to bloodstream (mean = $38,703) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections (mean = $35,367) were the largest. CONCLUSIONS: Increased standardization and rigor are needed. Clinicians should partner with economists and policy analysts to expand and improve the economic evidence available to reduce hospital complications such as NI and other adverse patient/staff outcomes.     

Increasing antimicrobial resistance: Therapeutic implications for enterococcal infections

Enterococcus was designated a genus distinct from the streptococci in 1984. Enterococci cause a variety of monomicrobial and polymicrobial infections, mainly in compromised patients. These infections include bacteremia, urinary and biliary tract infections, intra-abdominal sepsis, and decubitus and diabetic foot ulcers. Enterococcal infections may be acquired from the patient’s endogenous intestinal flora or exogenously from a fecally contaminated environment. Enterococci are inherently resistant to many antimicrobial agents and readily acquire additional resistances, which is likely the reason that enterococci have become prominent nosocomial pathogens. Only the combination of a cell wall-active antibiotic to which the Enterococcus is susceptible (ie, certain β-lactams or vancomycin) plus an aminoglycoside (ie, gentamicin or streptomycin) is bactericidal, and is required for cure of endocarditis, meningitis and probably infection in neutropenic patients; bacteriostatic activity is sufficient to treat most other infections. Treatment of infections caused by strains resistant to b-lactams, glycopeptides and aminoglycosides has become problematic due the limited number of therapeutic options. No medical therapy is reliably effective for endocarditis caused by strains resistant to all cell wall-active antibiotics and all aminoglycosides. New antimicrobial agents, such as linezolid and quinupristin/dalfopristin, have recently become available, but their activity against enterococci is mainly bacterostatic.     

An analysis of limb-threatening lower extremity wound complications after 1090 consecutive coronary artery bypass procedures.

The objective of this study was to examine and characterize limb-threatening lower extremity wound or soft tissue complications after coronary artery bypass (CABG) and determine risk factors for their cause. While minor wound problems of the leg after CABG are not uncommon, serious limb-threatening complications, though less frequent, do occur and are often de-emphasized in the surgical literature. A review of 1090 consecutive CABG procedures performed from January 1, 1995 through December 31, 1995 was instituted, which screened for limb-threatening lower extremity wound or soft tissue complications defined as wounds that: required additional surgery for treatment; prolonged the length of stay; or which required lengthy home health nursing for treatment. Minor lymph leaks, leg swelling, infections or wound problems treated as an outpatient were excluded. Of 1090 patients, 54 (5.0%) experienced a limb-threatening lower extremity complication. Complications were categorized as vein harvest incision non-healing (n = 36, 66.7%), decubitus ulceration (n = 11, 20.4%), forefoot ischemia/embolization (n = 10, 18.5%), groin hematoma/abscess (n = 6, 11.1%), severe cellulitis (n = 3, 5.6%), or a combination (n = 12, 22.2%). Statistically significant risk factors by univariate and bivariate analysis for a complication included older age (68 years vs 62 years, p = 0.007), female sex (57% vs 28%, p < 0.001), diabetes (57% vs 33%, p = 0.005) and longer pump time (129 min vs 114 min, p = 0.009). These complications necessitated five major lower extremity amputations and nine revascularization procedures. Chronic lower extremity ischemia from peripheral vascular disease (PVD) was a major contributing factor for the development of wounds in at least 23 (42.6%) of these patients, though suspected in only 10 (43.5%) preoperatively. A non-healing vein harvest incision below the knee of a patient retrospectively found to have inadequate distal circulation for healing occurred in 17 (31.5%) of the total 54 cases. It was concluded that non-healing vein incisions, decubitus ulcers and forefoot ischemic lesions frequently occurring in older diabetic females with undetected pre-existing PVD, comprise the majority of limb-threatening leg complications after CABG. Nearly one-third of the complications may have been avoided had the vein harvest incision not been made at the ankle of a patient with unappreciated PVD.     

Selection of patients with acute myocardial infarction for thrombolytic therapy

PURPOSE: To critically review the current recommendations regarding the eligibility of patients with myocardial infarction for thrombolytic therapy. DATA IDENTIFICATION: Relevant studies published from January 1980 to January 1990 were identified through a computerized search of the English-language literature using MEDLINE and by a manual search of the bibliographies of all identified articles. STUDY SELECTION: All randomized, controlled trials of intravenous thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina were reviewed. Smaller, observational studies and previous review articles were included when relevant to the discussion. DATA EXTRACTION: Key data were extracted from each article, including the proportions of patients eligible for thrombolysis, the reasons for exclusion from thrombolytic therapy, and the clinical outcomes of patients treated and of those excluded from treatment. The validity of certain exclusion criteria was examined using subgroup analysis from the large, randomized mortality trials of intravenous thrombolysis and observations from smaller, nonrandomized studies. RESULTS OF DATA SYNTHESIS: To date, relatively few patients with myocardial infarction have been considered eligible for fibrinolytic therapy. In this group, both early and late mortality have been significantly reduced. Patients excluded from thrombolysis, however, continue to have a high early mortality. The data suggest that the potential benefits of this treatment might be extended to selected high-risk subgroups. In particular, the risk-benefit ratio may favor the inclusion of otherwise healthy elderly patients; certain patients presenting more than 6 hours after the onset of symptoms; and patients with a history of controlled systolic hypertension or brief, nontraumatic cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The data do not support the use of fibrinolytic therapy as primary treatment in patients with unstable angina or suspected myocardial infarction in the absence of confirmatory electrocardiographic changes. CONCLUSIONS: The full potential of thrombolytic therapy to alter the natural history of acute myocardial infarction can only be realized through the continued evaluation of selection criteria and the identification and treatment of the greatest possible number of eligible patients.     

Saving the diabetic foot with special reference to the patient with chronic renal failure

The chronic renal failure patient with diabetes has a lower limb amputation rate 10 times greater than the diabetic population at large. In studies of causal pathways leading to non-traumatic related lower extremity amputation, foot ulcers preceded approximately 84% of the amputations. Even though foot ulcers are more likely to develop in patients with diabetic nephropathy, they are no less likely to heal than are those in diabetic patients with normal renal function. Consequently, attempts to save the diabetic foot even in this high-risk population are justified. The pathogenesis of foot ulceration in the chronic renal failure patient with diabetes is primarily due to peripheral neuropathy. Loss of protective sensation due to sensory neuropathy combined with motor and autonomic neuropathy and macrovascular compromise result in increased risk for foot complications. Evaluation of the foot includes a selective history and a focused examination of skin integrity, presence of sensory neuropathy or vascular insufficiency, and biomechanical and footwear inspection. Effective treatment of diabetic foot complications include appropriate antibiotics (when indicated), meticulous wound care, off-loading, vascular surgery (when indicated), and selective/elective or prophylactic nonvascular surgery. Failure to heal an ulcer can often be traced to common pitfalls, which include: A "cavalier" attitude. W.N.L. exam (We Never Looked). Inadequate off-loading. Failure to establish depth of ulcer and miss "probe to bone." Non-healing means unrelieved pressure and/or no blood. Failure to correct edema. The multidisciplinary diabetic foot clinic model provides an ideal setting for early intervention, treatment, and assistance with preventive strategies.     

Torsades de pointes induced by antibiotics

BACKGROUND: Several frequently used antibiotics are associated with an arrhythmia called "torsades de pointes" (TdP). This potentially fatal arrhythmia is considered unpredictable. METHODS: In order to investigate the prevalence of risk factors for TdP prior to initiation of antibiotic therapy, we conducted a literature search for all published reports on TdP induced by antibiotics and we asked pharmaceutical companies for additional unpublished reports. RESULTS: We studied 61 reports on 78 patients with TdP induced by antibiotics. Female gender was the most common risk factor for TdP: 66.7% (n=52) of all patients were women. Advanced heart disease and concomitant use of a QT interval-prolonging agent or an inhibitor of liver drug metabolism were also frequently present (59% and 48.7%, respectively). Most patients had at least one and 58 patients (74.3%) had two risk factors or more for TdP prior to initiation of antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: Contrary to common belief, TdP induced by antibiotics may be predictable by simple history-taking and by obtaining a baseline electrocardiogram. We wish to draw attention to risk factors for TdP prior to the initiation of antibiotic therapy.