How active gaze informs the hand in sequential pointing movements

Visual information is vital for fast and accurate hand movements. It has been demonstrated that allowing free eye movements results in greater accuracy than when the eyes maintain centrally fixed. Three explanations as to why free gaze improves accuracy are: shifting gaze to a target allows visual feedback in guiding the hand to the target (feedback loop), shifting gaze generates ocular-proprioception which can be used to update a movement (feedback–feedforward), or efference copy could be used to direct hand movements (feedforward). In this experiment we used a double-step task and manipulated the utility of ocular-proprioceptive feedback from eye to head position by removing the second target during the saccade. We confirm the advantage of free gaze for sequential movements with a double-step pointing task and document eye–hand lead times of approximately 200 ms for both initial movements and secondary movements. The observation that participants move gaze well ahead of the current hand target dismisses foveal feedback as a major contribution. We argue for a feedforward model based on eye movement efference as the major factor in enabling accurate hand movements. The results with the double-step target task also suggest the need for some buffering of efference and ocular-proprioceptive signals to cope with the situation where the eye has moved to a location ahead of the current target for the hand movement. We estimate that this buffer period may range between 120 and 200 ms without significant impact on hand movement accuracy.     

The coordination of eye, head, and arm movements during rapid gaze orienting and arm pointing

This study aimed to investigate the coordination of multiple control actions involved in human horizontal gaze orienting or arm pointing to a common visual target. The subjects performed a visually triggered reaction time task in three conditions: (1) gaze orienting with a combined eye saccade and head rotation (EH), (2) arm pointing with gaze orienting by an eye saccade without head rotation (EA), and (3) arm pointing with gaze orienting by a combined eye saccade and head rotation (EHA). The subjects initiated eye movement first with nearly constant latencies across all tasks, followed by head movement in the EH task, by arm movement in the EA task, and by head and then arm movements in the EHA task. The differences of onset times between eye and head movements in the EH task, and between eye and arm movements in the EA task, were both preserved in the EHA task, leading to an eye-to-head-to-arm sequence. The onset latencies of eye and head in the EH task, eye and arm in the EA task, and eye, head and arm in the EHA task, were all positively correlated on a trial-by-trial basis. In the EHA task, however, the correlation coefficients of eye–head coupling and of eye–arm coupling were reduced and increased, respectively, compared to those estimated in the two-effector conditions (EH, EA). These results suggest that motor commands for different motor effectors are linked differently to achieve coordination in a task-dependent manner.     

Gaze anchoring to a pointing target is present during the entire pointing movement and is driven by a non-visual signal

A well-coordinated pattern of eye and hand movements can be observed during goal-directed arm movements. Typically, a saccadic eye movement precedes the arm movement, and its occurrence is temporally correlated with the start of the arm movement. Furthermore, the coupling of gaze and aiming movements is also observable after pointing initiation. It has recently been observed that saccades cannot be directed to new target stimuli, away from a pointing target stimulus. Saccades directed to targets presented during the final phase of a pointing movement were delayed until after pointing movement offset ("gaze anchoring"). The present study investigated whether ocular gaze is anchored to a pointing target during the entire pointing movement. In experiment 1, new targets were presented at various times during the duration of a pointing movement, triggered by the kinematics arm moment itself (movement onset, peak acceleration/velocity/deceleration, and offset). Subjects had to make a saccade to the new target as fast as possible while maintaining the pointing movement to the initial target. Saccadic latencies were increased by an amount of time that approximately equaled the remaining pointing time after saccadic target presentation, with the majority of saccades executed after pointing movement offset. The nature of the signal driving gaze stabilization during pointing was investigated in experiment 2. In previous experiments where ocular gaze was anchored to a pointing target, subjects could always see their moving arm, thus it was unknown whether a visual image of the moving arm, an afferent (proprioceptive) signal or an efferent (motor control related) signal produced gaze anchoring. In experiment 2 subjects had to point with or without vision of the moving arm to test whether a visual signal is used to anchor gaze to a pointing target. Results indicate that gaze anchoring was also observed without vision of the moving arm. The findings support the existence of a mechanism enforcing ocular gaze anchoring during the entire duration of a pointing movement. Moreover, such a mechanism uses an internally generated, or proprioceptive, nonvisual signal. Possible neural substrates underlying these processes are discussed, as well as the role of selective attention.     

Segment interdependency and gaze anchoring during manual two-segment sequences

This study examined two-segment pointing movements with various accuracy constraints to test whether there is segment interdependency in saccadic eye movements that accompany manual actions. The other purpose was to examine how planning of movement accuracy and amplitude for the second pointing influences the timing of gaze shift to the second target at the transition between two segments. Participants performed a rapid two-segment pointing task, in which the first segment had two target sizes, and the second segment had two target sizes and two movement distances. The results showed that duration and peak velocity of the initial pointing were influenced by altered kinematic characteristics of the second pointing due to task manipulations of the second segment, revealing segment interdependency in hand movements. In contrast, saccade duration and velocity did not show such segment interdependency. Thus, unlike hand movements, saccades are planned and organized independently for each segment during sequential manual actions. In terms of the timing of gaze shift to the second target, this was delayed when the initial pointing was made to the smaller first target, indicating that gaze anchoring to the initial target is used to verify the pointing termination. Importantly, the gaze shift was delayed when the second pointing was made to the smaller or farther second target. This suggests that visual information of the hand position at the initial target is important for the planning of movement distance and accuracy of the next pointing. Furthermore, timings of gaze shift and pointing initiation to the second target were highly correlated. Thus, at the transition between two segments, gazes and hand movements are highly coupled in time, which allows the sensorimotor system to process visual and proprioceptive information for the verification of pointing termination and planning of the next pointing.     

Optimal contributions of head and eye positions to spatial accuracy in man tested by visually directed pointing

Encoding of visual target location in extrapersonal space requires convergence of at least three types of information: retinal signals, information about orbital eye positions, and the position of the head on the body. Since the position of gaze is the sum of the head position and the eye position, inaccuracy of spatial localization of the target may result from the sum of the corresponding three levels of errors: retina, ocular and head. In order to evaluate the possible errors evoked at each level, accuracy of target encoding was assessed through a motor response requiring subjects to point with the hand towards a target seen under foveal vision, eliminating the retinal source of error. Subjects had first to orient their head to one of three positions to the right (0, 40, 80°) and maintain this head position while orienting gaze and pointing to one of five target positions (0, 20, 40, 60, 80°). This resulted in 11 combinations of static head and eye positions, and corresponded to five different gaze eccentricities. The accuracy of target pointing was tested without vision of the moving hand. Six subjects were tested. No systematic bias in finger pointing was observed for eye positions ranging from 0 to 40° to the right or left within the orbit. However, the variability (as measured by a surface error) given by the scatter of hand pointing increased quadratically with eye eccentricity. A similar observation was made with the eye centreed and the head position ranging from 0 to 80°, although the surface error increased less steeply with eccentricity. Some interaction between eye and head eccentricity also contributed to the pointing error. These results suggest that pointing should be most accurate with a head displacement corresponding to 90% of the gaze eccentricity. These results explain the systematic hypometry of head orienting towards targets observed under natural conditions: thus the respective contribution of head and eye to gaze orientation might be determined in order to optimize accuracy of target encoding.     

Vestibuloocular reflex inhibition and gaze saccade control characteristics during eye-head orientation in humans

1. In natural conditions, gaze (i.e., eye + head) orientation is a complex behavior involving simultaneously the eye and head motor systems. Thus one of the key problems of gaze control is whether or not the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR) elicited by head rotation and saccadic eye movement linearly add. 2. Kinematics of human gaze saccades within the oculomotor range (OMR) were quantified under different conditions of head motion. Saccades were visually triggered while the head was fixed or passively moving at a constant velocity (200 deg/s) either in the same direction as, or opposite to, the saccade. Active eye-head coordination was also studied in a session in which subjects were trained to actively rotate their head at a nearly constant velocity during the saccade and, in another session, during natural gaze responses. 3. When the head was passively rotated toward the visual target, both maximum and mean gaze velocities increased with respect to control responses with the head fixed; these effects increased with gaze saccade amplitude. In addition, saccade duration was reduced so that corresponding gaze accuracy, although poorer than for control responses, was not dramatically affected by head motion. 4. The same effects on gaze velocity were present during active head motion when a constant head velocity was maintained throughout saccade duration, and gaze saccades were as accurate as with the head fixed. 5. During natural gaze responses, an increased gaze velocity and a decreased saccade duration with respect to control responses became significant only for gaze displacement larger than 30 degrees, due to the negligible contribution of head motion for smaller responses. 6. When the head was passively rotated in the opposite direction to target step, gaze saccades were slower than those obtained with the head fixed; but their average accuracy was still maintained. 7. These results confirm a VOR inhibition during saccadic eye movements within the OMR. This inhibition, present in all 16 subjects studied, ranged from 40 to 96% (for a 40 degree target step) between subjects and increased almost linearly with target step amplitude. Furthermore, the systematic difference between instantaneous VOR gain estimated at the time of maximum gaze velocity and mean VOR gain estimated over the whole saccadic duration indicates a decay of VOR inhibition during the ongoing saccade. 8. A simplified model is proposed with a varying VOR inhibition during the saccade. It suggests that VOR inhibition is not directly controlled by the saccadic pulse generator.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Eye and head coupled and dissociated movements during orientation to a double step visual target displacement

Summary Tight coupling between eye and head movements has been observed in response to a single visual target offset. On this basis, when the visual stimulus consists of two successive steps in the same (horizontal) direction, either increasing in eccentricity (staircase) or decreasing in eccentricity (pulse-step) gaze should be due to concomitant eye and head angular displacement. That is, the eyes and head should aim at each target displacement so that their combined movement matches target offset. We have tested this hypothesis in five healthy subjects. The measured variables were head and gaze offset, the interval between two consecutive saccades from onset to onset (I) and the response delay between onset of the second step and onset of the first gaze saccade (D). With both staircase and pulse-step stimuli, the eye saccade preceded the head movement, and the gaze response either had the stimulus profile pattern or consisted of one gaze saccade to the final target offset. In response to staircase stimuli, I decreased concomitantly with an increase in D; with pulse-step stimuli, as D increased, I decreased slightly in three subjects and decreased markedly in two subjects. Dissociation between the eye and head movements could clearly be demonstrated with pulse-step stimuli: the first gaze saccade to the target pulse displacement was accompanied by a head movement to the target step offset. We also observed cases in which the gaze saccade to the target step displacement was made simultaneously with the head movement to the target pulse offset. Our study extends previous observations in head fixed condition and illustrates that in the majority of cases, when the head is free and a visual pulse step stimulus is presented, both the saccadic and head systems have the ability to modify or cancel the initial neural command to move to the first target displacement. When this modification takes place in only one system, eye and head movements are dissociated.On leave from the Occupational Health and Rehabilitation Institute at Loewenstein Hospital, P.O. Box 3, Raanana 43 100, Israel     

Representation of heading direction in far and near head space

Manipulation of objects around the head requires an accurate and stable internal representation of their locations in space, also during movements such as that of the eye or head. For far space, the representation of visual stimuli for goal-directed arm movements relies on retinal updating, if eye movements are involved. Recent neurophysiological studies led us to infer that a transformation of visual space from retinocentric to a head-centric representation may be involved for visual objects in close proximity to the head. The first aim of this study was to investigate if there is indeed such a representation for remembered visual targets of goal-directed arm movements. Participants had to point toward an initially foveated central target after an intervening saccade. Participants made errors that reflect a bias in the visuomotor transformation that depends on eye displacement rather than any head-centred variable. The second issue addressed was if pointing toward the centre of a wide-field expanding motion pattern involves a retinal updating mechanism or a transformation to a head-centric map and if that process is distance dependent. The same pattern of pointing errors in relation to gaze displacement was found independent of depth. We conclude that for goal-directed arm movements, representation of the remembered visual targets is updated in a retinal frame, a mechanism that is actively used regardless of target distance, stimulus characteristics or the requirements of the task.     

The contribution of coordinated eye and head movements in hand pointing accuracy

Summary The accuracy of pointing movements of the hand, directed at visual targets 10° to 40° from the midline, was measured in normal human subjects. No visual feedback from the moving hand was available to the subjects. The head could be either maintained stationary (head-fixed condition) or free to move (head-free condition) during the pointing movements. It was found that the error in pointing was reduced for all targets in the head-free condition. This reduction was more important for the more eccentric target (40°). Improvement in accuracy was observed without any significant change in either the latency or the duration of eye, head or hand movements. In the head-free condition, it was found that the head was displaced in the direction of the target by an amount representing no more than 2/3 of the target amplitude. The improvement in accuracy was not influenced by the amplitude of the head movement. A model is proposed which shows how coordinated eye and head movements could improve the encoding of target position.Work supported by INSERM-Unité 94     

Eye-head coordination in cats

Gaze is the position of the visual axis in space and is the sum of the eye movement relative to the head plus head movement relative to space. In monkeys, a gaze shift is programmed with a single saccade that will, by itself, take the eye to a target, irrespective of whether the head moves. If the head turns simultaneously, the saccade is correctly reduced in size (to prevent gaze overshoot) by the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). Cats have an oculomotor range (OMR) of only about +/- 25 degrees, but their field of view extends to about +/- 70 degrees. The use of the monkey's motor strategy to acquire targets lying beyond +/- 25 degrees requires the programming of saccades that cannot be physically made. We have studied, in cats, rapid horizontal gaze shifts to visual targets within and beyond the OMR. Heads were either totally unrestrained or attached to an apparatus that permitted short unexpected perturbations of the head trajectory. Qualitatively, similar rapid gaze shifts of all sizes up to at least 70 degrees could be accomplished with the classic single-eye saccade and a saccade-like head movement. For gaze shifts greater than 30 degrees, this classic pattern frequently was not observed, and gaze shifts were accomplished with a series of rapid eye movements whose time separation decreased, frequently until they blended into each other, as head velocity increased. Between discrete rapid eye movements, gaze continued in constant velocity ramps, controlled by signals added to the VOR-induced compensatory phase that followed a saccade. When the head was braked just prior to its onset in a 10 degrees gaze shift, the eye attained the target. This motor strategy is the same as that reported for monkeys. However, for larger target eccentricities (e.g., 50 degrees), the gaze shift was interrupted by the brake and the average saccade amplitude was 12-15 degrees, well short of the target and the OMR. Gaze shifts were completed by vestibularly driven eye movements when the head was released. Braking the head during either quick phases driven by passive head displacements or visually triggered saccades resulted in an acceleration of the eye, thereby implying interaction between the VOR and these rapid-eye-movement signals. Head movements possessed a characteristic but task-dependent relationship between maximum velocity and amplitude. Head movements terminated with the head on target. The eye saccade usually lagged the head displacement.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Visual signals contribute to the coding of gaze direction

Accurate information about gaze direction is required to direct the hand towards visual objects in the environment. In the present experiments, we tested whether retinal inputs affect the accuracy with which healthy subjects indicate their gaze direction with the unseen index finger after voluntary saccadic eye movements. In experiment 1, subjects produced a series of back and forth saccades (about eight) of self-selected magnitudes before positioning the eyes in a self-chosen direction to the right. The saccades were produced while facing one of four possible visual scenes: (1) complete darkness, (2) a scene composed of a single light-emitting diode (LED) located at 18 degrees to the right, (3) a visually enriched scene made up of three LEDs located at 0 degrees, 18 degrees and 36 degrees to the right, or (4) a normally illuminated scene where the lights in the experimental room were turned on. Subjects were then asked to indicate their gaze direction with their unseen index finger. In the conditions where the visual scenes were composed of LEDs, subjects were instructed to foveate or not foveate one of the LEDs with their last saccade. It was therefore possible to compare subjects' accuracy when pointing in the direction of their gaze in conditions with and without foveal stimulation. The results showed that the accuracy of the pointing movements decreased when subjects produced their saccades in a dark environment or in the presence of a single LED compared to when the saccades were generated in richer visual environments. Visual stimulation of the fovea did not increase subjects' accuracy when pointing in the direction of their gaze compared to conditions where there was only stimulation of the peripheral retina. Experiment 2 tested how the retinal signals could contribute to the coding of eye position after saccadic eye movements. More specifically, we tested whether the shift in the retinal image of the environment during the saccades provided information about the reached position of the eyes. Subjects produced their series of saccades while facing a visual environment made up of three LEDs. In some trials, the whole visual scene was displaced either 4.5 degrees to the left or 3 degrees to the right during the primary saccade. These displacements created mismatches between the shift of the retinal image of the environment and the extent of gaze deviation. The displacements of the visual scene were not perceived by the subjects because they occurred near the peak velocity of the saccade (saccadic suppression phenomenon). Pointing accuracy was not affected by the unperceived shifts of the visual scene. The results of these experiments suggest that the arm motor system receives more precise information about gaze direction when there is retinal stimulation than when there is none. They also suggest that the most relevant factor in defining gaze direction is not the retinal locus of the visual stimulation (that is peripheral or foveal) but rather the amount of visual information. Finally, the results suggest an enhanced egocentric encoding of gaze direction by the retinal inputs and do not support a retinotopic model for encoding gaze direction.     

Effects of short-term adaptation of saccadic gaze amplitude on hand-pointing movements

 We investigated whether and how adaptive changes in saccadic amplitudes (short-term saccadic adaptation) modify hand movements when subjects are involved in a pointing task to visual targets without vision of the hand. An experiment consisted of the pre-adaptation test of hand pointing (placing the finger tip on a LED position), a period of adaptation, and a post-adaptation test of hand pointing. In a basic task (transfer paradigm A), the pre- and post-adaptation trials were performed without accompanying eye and head movements: in the double-step gaze adaptation task, subjects had to fixate a single, suddenly displaced visual target by moving eyes and head in a natural way. Two experimental sessions were run with the visual target jumping during the saccades, either backwards (from 30 to 20°, gaze saccade shortening) or onwards (30 to 40°, gaze saccade lengthening). Following gaze-shortening adaptation (level of adaptation 79±10%, mean and s.d.), we found a statistically significant shift (t-test, error level P<0.05) in the final hand-movement points, possibly due to adaptation transfer, representing 15.2% of the respective gaze adaptation. After gaze-lengthening adaptation (level of adaptation 92±17%), a non-significant shift occurred in the opposite direction to that expected from adaptation transfer. The applied computations were also performed on some data of an earlier transfer paradigm (B, three target displacements at a time) with gain shortening. They revealed a significant transfer relative to the amount of adaptation of 18.5±17.5% (P<0.05). In the coupling paradigm (C), we studied the influence of gaze saccade adaptation of hand-pointing movements with concomitant orienting gaze shifts. The adaptation levels achieved were 59±20% (shortening) and 61±27% (lengthening). Shifts in the final fingertip positions were congruent with internal coupling between gaze and hand, representing 53% of the respective gaze-amplitude changes in the shortening session and 6% in the lengthening session. With an adaptation transfer of less than 20% (paradigm A and B), we concluded that saccadic adaptation does not ”automatically” produce a functionally meaningful change in the skeleto-motor system controlling hand-pointing movements. In tasks with concomitant gaze saccades (coupling paradigm C), the modification of hand pointing by the adapted gaze comes out more clearly, but only in the shortening session. Received: 9 February 1998 / Accepted: 18 August 1998     

Short- and long-term consequences of canal plugging on gaze shifts in the rhesus monkey. I. Effects on gaze stabilization.

Short- and long-term consequences of canal plugging on gaze shifts in the rhesus monkey. I. Effects on gaze stabilization. To study the contribution of the vestibular system to the coordinated eye and head movements of a gaze shift, we plugged the lumens of just the horizontal (n = 2) or all six semicircular canals (n = 1) in monkeys trained to make horizontal head-unrestrained gaze shifts to visual targets. After the initial eye saccade of a gaze shift, normal monkeys exhibit a compensatory eye counterrotation that stabilizes gaze as the head movement continues. This counterrotation, which has a gain (eye velocity/head velocity) near one has been attributed to the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). One day after horizontal canal plugging, the gain of the passive horizontal VOR at frequencies between 0.1 and 1.0 Hz was <0.10 in the horizontal-canal-plugged animals and zero in the all-canal-plugged animal. One day after surgery, counterrotation gain was approximately 0.3 in the animals with horizontal canals plugged and absent in the animal with all canals plugged. As the time after plugging increased, so too did counterrotation gain. In all three animals, counterrotation gain recovered to between 0.56 and 0.75 within 80-100 days. The initial loss of compensatory counterrotation after plugging resulted in a gaze shift that ended long after the eye saccade and just before the end of the head movement. With recovery, the length of time between the end of the eye saccade and the end of the gaze movement decreased. This shortening of the duration of reduced gain counterrotation occurred both because head movements ended sooner and counterrotation gain returned to 1.0 more rapidly relative to the end of the eye saccade. Eye counterrotation was not due to activation of pursuit eye movements as it persisted when gaze shifts were executed to extinguished targets. Also counterrotation was not due simply to activation of neck receptors because counterrotation persisted after head movements were arrested in midflight. We suggest that the neural signal that is used to cause counterrotation in the absence of vestibular input is an internal copy of the intended head movement.     

Dissociation of eye and head components of gaze shifts by stimulation of the omnipause neuron region

Natural movements often include actions integrated across multiple effectors. Coordinated eye-head movements are driven by a command to shift the line of sight by a desired displacement vector. Yet because extraocular and neck motoneurons are separate entities, the gaze shift command must be separated into independent signals for eye and head movement control. We report that this separation occurs, at least partially, at or before the level of pontine omnipause neurons (OPNs). Stimulation of the OPNs prior to and during gaze shifts temporally decoupled the eye and head components by inhibiting gaze and eye saccades. In contrast, head movements were consistently initiated before gaze onset, and ongoing head movements continued along their trajectories, albeit with some characteristic modulations. After stimulation offset, a gaze shift composed of an eye saccade, and a reaccelerated head movement was produced to preserve gaze accuracy. We conclude that signals subject to OPN inhibition produce the eye-movement component of a coordinated eye-head gaze shift and are not the only signals involved in the generation of the head component of the gaze shift.     

Ocular gaze is anchored to the target of an ongoing pointing movement

It is well known that, typically, saccadic eye movements precede goal-directed hand movements to a visual target stimulus. Also pointing in general is more accurate when the pointing target is gazed at. In this study, it is hypothesized that saccades are not only preceding pointing but that gaze also is stabilized during pointing in humans. Subjects, whose eye and pointing movements were recorded, had to make a hand movement and a saccade to a first target. At arm movement peak velocity, when the eyes are usually already fixating the first target, a new target appeared, and subjects had to make a saccade toward it (dynamical trial type). In the statical trial type, a new target was offered when pointing was just completed. In a control experiment, a sequence of two saccades had to be made, with two different interstimulus intervals (ISI), comparable with the ISIs found in the first experiment for dynamic and static trial types. In a third experiment, ocular fixation position and pointing target were dissociated, subjects pointed at not fixated targets. The results showed that latencies of saccades toward the second target were on average 155 ms longer in the dynamic trial types, compared with the static trial types. Saccades evoked during pointing appeared to be delayed with approximately the remaining deceleration time of the pointing movement, resulting in "normal" residual saccadic reaction times (RTs), measured from pointing movement offset to saccade movement onset. In the control experiment, the latency of the second saccade was on average only 29 ms larger when the two targets appeared with a short ISI compared with trials with long ISIs. Therefore the saccadic refractory period cannot be responsible for the substantially bigger delays that were found in the first experiment. The observed saccadic delay during pointing is modulated by the distance between ocular fixation position and pointing target. The largest delays were found when the targets coincided, the smallest delays when they were dissociated. In sum, our results provide evidence for an active saccadic inhibition process, presumably to keep steady ocular fixation at a pointing target and its surroundings. Possible neurophysiological substrates that might underlie the reported phenomena are discussed.     

Effects of hand termination and accuracy constraint on eye–hand coordination during sequential two-segment movements

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of accuracy constraints and termination requirements of hand movement on eye-hand coordination. Healthy adults performed two-segment eye and hand aiming movements to predetermined stationary targets. While two-segment eye movements were made to the first and second targets for all conditions, hand movements were varied across conditions. The first segment had two target sizes to alter accuracy constraints. There were three hand movement types with different termination requirements: (1) stop both at the first and at the second targets, (2) stop at the first target and discontinue, and (3) move through the first target and discontinue. The results showed that the initiation of saccades was moderately correlated with the initiation of hand movements, and both initiations changed in a similar fashion depending on various hand termination requirements. Amplitude of primary saccades and frequency of corrective saccades during the first segment were affected by the combined effects of accuracy constraints and hand termination requirements. These results suggest that the planning and execution of saccades are based in part on global task constraints related to the accuracy and termination demands of hand movements over the two segments. During the transition from the first to the second segment, the gaze was held on the first target until shortly after the pointing to that target was terminated, showing gaze anchoring. The gaze anchoring was prolonged due to the increased accuracy constraint of that target or by including pointing to the second target. However, the gaze anchoring was broken prior to the completion of pointing when the accuracy constraint was reduced and pointing to the second target was excluded. The observed modifications of gaze anchoring imply that the oculomotor system is functionally obligated to fixate a gaze to a pointing target only to the extent that successful completion of a pointing task is ensured by the actual completion or by a predictive assessment of pointing termination.     

Gaze orienting in dynamic visual double steps

Visual stimuli are initially represented in a retinotopic reference frame. To maintain spatial accuracy of gaze (i.e., eye in space) despite intervening eye and head movements, the visual input could be combined with dynamic feedback about ongoing gaze shifts. Alternatively, target coordinates could be updated in advance by using the preprogrammed gaze-motor command ("predictive remapping"). So far, previous experiments have not dissociated these possibilities. Here we study whether the visuomotor system accounts for saccadic eye-head movements that occur during target presentation. In this case, the system has to deal with fast dynamic changes of the retinal input and with highly variable changes in relative eye and head movements that cannot be preprogrammed by the gaze control system. We performed visual-visual double-step experiments in which a brief (50-ms) stimulus was presented during a saccadic eye-head gaze shift toward a previously flashed visual target. Our results show that gaze shifts remain accurate under these dynamic conditions, even for stimuli presented near saccade onset, and that eyes and head are driven in oculocentric and craniocentric coordinates, respectively. These results cannot be explained by a predictive remapping scheme. We propose that the visuomotor system adequately processes dynamic changes in visual input that result from self-initiated gaze shifts, to construct a stable representation of visual targets in an absolute, supraretinal (e.g., world) reference frame. Predictive remapping may subserve transsaccadic integration, thus enabling perception of a stable visual scene despite eye movements, whereas dynamic feedback ensures accurate actions (e.g., eye-head orienting) to a selected goal.     

Saccade dysmetria in head-unrestrained gaze shifts after muscimol inactivation of the caudal fastigial nucleus in the monkey

Lesions in the caudal fastigial nucleus (cFN) severely impair the accuracy of visually guided saccades in the head-restrained monkey. Is the saccade dysmetria a central perturbation in issuing commands for orienting gaze (eye in space) or is it a more peripheral impairment in generating oculomotor commands? This question was investigated in two head-unrestrained monkeys by analyzing the effect of inactivating one cFN on horizontal gaze shifts generated from a straight ahead fixation light-emitting diode (LED) toward a 40 degrees eccentric target LED. After muscimol injections, when viewing the fixation LED, the starting position of the head was changed (ipsilesional and upward deviations). Ipsilesional gaze shifts were associated with a 24% increase in the eye saccade amplitude and a 58% reduction in the amplitude of the head contribution. Contralesional gaze shifts were associated with a decrease in the amplitude of both eye and head components (40 and 37% reduction, respectively). No correlation between the changes in the eye amplitude and in head contribution was observed. The amplitude of the complete head movement was decreased for ipsilesional movements (57% reduction) and unaffected for contralesional movements. For both ipsilesional and contralesional gaze shifts, the changes in eye saccade amplitude were strongly correlated with the changes in gaze amplitude and largely accounted for the gaze dysmetria. These results indicate a major role of cFN in the generation of appropriate saccadic oculomotor commands during head-unrestrained gaze shifts.     

The relative contribution of retinal and extraretinal signals in determining the accuracy of reaching movements in normal subjects and a deafferented patient

This experiment investigated the relative extent to which different signals from the visuo-oculomotor system are used to improve accuracy of arm movements. Different visuo-oculomotor conditions were used to produce various retinal and extraretinal signals leading to a similar target amplitude: (a) fixating a central target while pointing to a peripheral visual target, (b) tracking a target through smooth pursuit movement and then pointing to the target when its excursion ceased, and (c) pointing to a target reached previously by a saccadic eye movement. The experiment was performed with a deafferented subject and control subjects. For the deafferented patient, the absence of proprioception prevented any comparison between internal representations of target and limb (through proprioception) positions during the arm movement. The deafferented patient's endpoint therefore provided a good estimate of the accuracy of the target coordinates used by the arm motor system. The deafferented subject showed relatively good accuracy by producing a saccade prior to the pointing, but large overshooting in the fixation condition and undershooting in the pursuit condition. The results suggest that the deafferented subject does use oculomotor signals to program arm movement and that signals associated with fast movements of the eyes are better for pointing accuracy than slow ramp movements. The inaccuracy of the deafferented subject when no eye movement is allowed (the condition in which the controls were the most accurate) suggests that, in this condition, a proprioceptive map is involved in which both the target and the arm are represented.     

Head–eye interactions during vertical gaze shifts made by rhesus monkeys

Changing the direction of the line of sight (gaze) can involve coordinated movements of the eyes and head. During gaze shifts directed along the horizontal meridian, the contribution of the eyes and head depends upon the position of the eyes in the orbits; the contribution of the head to accomplishing the overall shift in gaze declines as the eyes increasingly are deviated away from the direction of the ensuing gaze shift. Also during horizontal gaze shifts, changes in the metrics and kinematics of the saccadic (eye movement) portion of coordinated movements, are correlated with the amplitude and velocity of the concurrent head movement. With increasing head contributions, saccade peak velocities decline, durations increase and velocity profiles develop two peaks. It remains unknown whether the interaction between head and eyes observed during horizontal gaze shifts also occurs during vertical gaze shifts. Yet, a full understanding of the neural control of eye–head coordination will depend upon the correlation of neural activity and features of vertical as well as horizontal movements. This report describes the metrics and kinematics of vertical gaze shifts made by head-unrestrained rhesus monkeys. Key observations include: (1) during vertical gaze shifts of a particular amplitude, relative eye and head contributions depend upon the initial vertical positions of the eyes in the orbits; (2) as head contribution increases, peak eye velocities decline, durations increase and vertical velocity profiles develop two peaks; (3) head movement metrics and kinematics are accurately predictable given knowledge only of head movement amplitude. In these ways, vertical gaze shifts were found to be qualitatively similar to horizontal gaze shifts. It seems probable that similar mechanisms mediate head–eye interactions during both horizontal and vertical movements. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that a signal proportional to vertical head velocity reduces the gain of the vertical saccade burst generator.