Age-dependent relationship between bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and total serum IgE level in asthmatic children.

BACKGROUND: A relationship between nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness and allergic airway inflammation has been reported in children and in adults with asthma, but the relationship in infants with asthma is still unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between bronchial hyperresponsiveness and total serum IgE level throughout childhood. Bronchial reactivity to methacholine from the age of 1 to 16 years was studied by methacholine inhalation challenge using transcutaneous oxygen pressure (tcPO2) monitoring. METHODS: Two hundred one asthmatic children (boys:girls = 132:69; 7.3+/-4.0 years of age, mean +/- SD) were enrolled in this study. The tcPO2 was measured using a tcPO2 monitor. Serial doses of methacholine were doubled until a 10% decrease in tcPO2 from the baseline was reached. The cumulative dose of methacholine at the inflection point of tcPO2 was considered to represent the bronchial reactivity to methacholine. RESULTS: There was no relationship between the cumulative dose of methacholine at the inflection point of tcPO2 and total serum IgE level in the group of children aged 1 to 4 years (P = 0.212), but significant correlations were found in the groups aged 5 to 10 years and 11 to 16 years (P = 0.044 and P = 0.014, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there is an age-dependent relationship between bronchial reactivity to methacholine and the total serum IgE level and that inhaled allergens, which were more common allergens in older children, may have some effects on the degree of bronchial reactivity to methacholine in children with asthma.     

Effect of nasal triamcinolone acetonide on seasonal variations of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and bronchial inflammation in nonasthmatic children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that patients with allergic rhinitis have lower airway inflammation and a higher prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) regardless of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate markers of lower airway inflammation in nonasthmatic children with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) before and during pollen season and the effect of nasal triamcinolone acetonide on seasonal variations in these parameters. METHODS: Thirty-two nonasthmatic children with SAR in response to grass and/or weed pollens were recruited and separated into 2 groups. Group 1 was treated with triamcinolone acetonide (220 microg once daily) for 6 weeks, and group 2 received no intranasal corticosteroid treatment. Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine [concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (PC20)], eosinophil counts in sputum and peripheral blood, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels in sputum and serum were measured before and during grass pollen season. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients completed the study. During the pollen season, methacholine PC20 significantly decreased in both groups when compared with the corresponding preseasonal values (P = .01 and P = .003, respectively). The mean percentage of sputum eosinophils increased significantly during the pollen season compared with preseasonal values in group 1 and group 2 (12.7% +/- 2.1% vs 16.5% +/- 2.1%, P = .007, and 11.0% +/- 2.0% vs 20.2% +/- 1.4%, P = .003, respectively). Median [interquartile ranges (IQR)] sputum ECP levels were significantly higher during the pollen season when compared with the preseasonal values in group 1 and group 2 [7.5 microg/L (3.5-36.0 microg/L) vs 35.5 microg/L (13.0-71.7 microg/L), P = .04, and 18.0 microg/L (6.0-36.0 microg/L) vs 69.0 microg/L (39.0-195.0 microg/L), P = .003, respectively], as were the serum ECP levels [6.0 microg/L (2.0-13.0 microg/L) vs 19.0 microg/L (14.0-43.5 microg/L), P = .004, and 6.0 microg/L (3.0-7.0 microg/L) vs 18.0 microg/L (6.0-36.0 microg/L), P = .001, respectively]. Although the mean number of eosinophils in blood increased during the pollen season in both groups, it was only significant in group 2 (70.0 +/- 20.0 vs 161.6 +/- 29.0, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Although prophylactic nasal corticosteroid treatment provides significant reduction of nasal symptoms and rescue antihistamine use, there is no significant prevention in the seasonal increase of bronchial inflammation and methacholine BHR.     

Eosinophilic airway inflammation in nasal polyposis.

BACKGROUND: Asthma and asymptomatic bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) are frequent findings in patients with nasal polyposis (NP). OBJECTIVE: To elucidate mechanisms responsible for the development of BHR, we initiated a prospective study of bronchial inflammation as assessed by bronchial lavage (BL) and bronchial biopsy specimens in 35 patients with noninfectious NP. METHODS: BHR was determined with methacholine provocation testing. Differential cell count, ECP, and histamine and tryptase levels were determined in BLs. Pathologic examination of bronchial biopsy specimens was performed with May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain to assess the number of lymphocytes. Indirect immunoenzymatic methods were used to identify eosinophils and mast cells. RESULTS: Fourteen patients did not exhibit BHR (group A); 7 patients had asymptomatic BHR (group B); and 14 patients had BHR associated with asthma (group C). Patients of group C tended to have a longer duration of nasal symptoms than those of groups A and B. FEV1 (L) was significantly lower in group C than in groups A and B. The number and percentage of eosinophils were significantly higher in BLs in groups B and C than in group A (P <. 05). Patients of groups B and C had a significantly higher number of eosinophils in bronchial submucosa (14.0 +/- 1.5/mm2 and 19.0 +/- 1. 9/mm2, respectively) than patients of group A (0.1 +/- 0.1/mm2). The number of lymphocytes was also higher in groups B and C than in group A. FEV1 (percent of predicted value) and eosinophil number within bronchial mucosa correlated negatively. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that patients with NP and asymptomatic BHR had an eosinophilic bronchial inflammation similar to that observed in asthmatic patients with NP, whereas patients with NP without BHR do not feature eosinophilic lower airways inflammation. The clinical relevance of these results requires careful follow-up to determine whether eosinophilic inflammation in these patients precedes and is responsible for the development of obvious asthma.     

Relationship of skin-prick reactivity to aeroallergens and hyperresponsiveness to challenges with methacholine and adenosine monophosphate

BACKGROUND: Clarification of the relationship between atopy and bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), both key features of asthma, is critical to our understanding of the disease. We therefore investigated the putative relationship between skin-prick reactivity to aeroallergens and BHR to direct and indirect stimuli. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 332 patients presenting with a diagnosis of asthma. Patients were characterized by skin prick tests (SPT), spirometry and bronchial challenge with methacholine and adenosine monophosphate (AMP). RESULTS: For patients who had BHR to methacholine but not AMP, the presence of atopy was associated with a lower PD20 (the provocative dose of methacholine producing a fall in FEV1 of 20%), amounting to a geometric mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) of 2.3-fold (1.4-4.0) difference. Furthermore, the number of skin-prick positive (SPP) responses was related to methacholine reactivity: 0-1 SPP, PD20 = 69.9 micro g; 2-4 SPP, PD20 = 47.8 micro g; 5-8 SPP, PD20 = 35.6 micro g. There was a 2.0- fold (1.1-3.6) difference between the groups with a low (0-1 SPP) and high (5-8 SPP) degree of skin-prick reactivity. A similar pattern was seen when data were analyzed including only perennial allergens. Spirometry was unrelated to the degree of skin-prick reactivity. DISCUSSION: These results suggest that skin-prick reactivity to aeroallergens is associated with BHR to methacholine.     

Nasal eosinophilic inflammation contributes to bronchial hyperresponsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis

There are increasing evidences that allergic rhinitis (AR) may influence the clinical course of asthma. We conducted methacholine challenge test and nasal eosinophils on nasal smear to patients with allergic rhinitis in order to investigate the mechanism of connecting upper and lower airway inflammation in 35 patients with AR during exacerbation. The methacholine concentration causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PC20) was used as thresholds of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR). Thresholds of 25 mg/dL or less were assumed to indicate BHR. All patients had normal pulmonary function. Significant differences in BHR were detected in the comparison of patients with cough or postnasal drip and without cough or postnasal drip. There were significant differences of PC20 between patients with cough or postnasal drip and those without cough or postnasal drip (3.41+/-3.59 mg/mL vs 10.2+/-1.2 mg/mL, p=0.001). The levels of total IgE were higher in patients with seasonal AR than in patients with perennial AR with exacerbation (472.5+/-132.5 IU/L vs. 389.0+/-70.9 IU/L, p<0.05). Nasal eosinophils were closely related to log PC20 (r=-0.65, p<0.01). These findings demonstrated that nasal eosinophilic inflammation might contribute to BHR in patients with AR.     

Increased eosinophil cation protein level in sensitized nonasthmatics is linked to subsequent hyperresponsiveness to methacholine. The Odense Schoolchild Study

Background: Increased levels of eosinophil cation protein (ECP) in sensitized subjects may reflect early stages of an ongoing inflammatory process and therefore precede asthma and bronchial hyperreactivity. Aim: To study whether nonasthmatic subjects with sensitization to allergens and increased ECP levels are at a higher risk for subsequent increased bronchial reactivity compared with sensitized nonasthmatics with normal ECP levels. Methods: A prospective study of 240 schoolchildren with a mean age of 13.9 years (range: 12.6-15.9) who were followed up after 6.3 years. Bronchial reactivity was assessed by methacholine provocation testing. Sensitization was defined by one or more positive reactions (>3 mm wheal) to 10 common aeroallergens by skin prick testing. Increased ECP was defined as values above 20 microg/l. This separated the subjects into four categories: group 1: healthy controls without sensitization (n = 147); group 2: sensitized subjects with a serum ECP below 20 microg/l (n = 55); group 3: sensitized subjects with an ECP level at or above 20 microg/l (n = 16), and group 4: all asthmatics (n = 22). Results: Bronchial reactivity was similar in subjects of groups 2 and 3 at baseline (p = 0.8). Six years later, subjects from group 3 were more responsive to methacholine compared with subjects from group 2 (median: 12.7 versus 20.5 micromol; p < 0.05). In a logistic regression with hyperresponsiveness to methacholine at follow-up as dependent variable, the odds ratios (OR) for the groups were, with group 1 as reference: group 2: OR = 2.2 (0.8-6.6: p = 0.2), group 3: 5.9 (1. 6-21.7: p < 0.01). Conclusion: Subjects with sensitization and increased ECP levels are subsequently more airway-responsive to methacholine compared with sensitized subjects with normal ECP levels. This supports the hypothesis that sensitization is linked to increased bronchial reactivity through a process in which markers of inflammation are involved.     

Serum eosinophil cationic protein (sECP) in subjects with a history of asthma symptoms with or without rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Serum eosinophil cationic protein (sECP) has been proposed as a marker of disease activity in bronchial asthma. The study aimed to evaluate the role of sECP in screening asthmatics in a group of subjects with asthma and rhinitis symptoms, and the relationship between sECP and clinical and functional parameters of asthma. METHODS: A total of 185 subjects with asthma symptoms, 149 of them with rhinitis as well, underwent skin tests, spirometry, methacholine (MCH) test, blood sampling for eosinophil percentage (bEOS%) and sECP determination, and nasal secretions smear for eosinophil percentage (nEOS%) determination; PEF values, symptoms, and medication over a period of 4 weeks after sampling for sECP quantitation were recorded on a diary. RESULTS: A total of 99 (53%) subjects received a diagnosis of asthma (asthmatics), and 86 did not (nonasthmatics). In asthmatics, neither sECP nor bEOS% was significantly different from nonasthmatics. In asthmatics, sECP was higher in subjects with increased than in those with normal daily PEF variability (16.4, 6.8-24.4 vs 5.3, 3.9-8.4 microg/l; P<0.001). sECP was higher in moderate persistent asthma than in intermittent asthma (24.8, 10.6-53 vs 8.4, 5.6-14.1; P<0.05). In nonasthmatics (73 with a history of rhinitis), both sECP and bEOS% correlated with nEOS% (rho=0.35; P<0.01 and rho=0.53; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In adults with asthma symptoms with or without rhinitis, sECP did not distinguish asthmatics from nonasthmatics. In asthmatics, sECP was associated with PEF variability and symptom severity. In subjects with asthma and rhinitis, as well as in subjects with only rhinitis, sECP levels are possibly influenced by nasal inflammation.     

Circadian variation of urinary eosinophil protein X in asthmatic and healthy children

BACKGROUND: It is suggested that urinary eosinophil protein X (EPX) is a noninvasive tool to monitor bronchial inflammation in asthmatic children. However, circadian variation of the number and activation of eosinophils might possibly influence urinary EPX excretion. OBJECTIVE: Measurements of urinary EPX (radioimmunoassay) were used to investigate circadian variation of eosinophilic activation and to monitor bronchial inflammation in children with asthma before and after treatment with corticosteroids. METHODS: Urinary EPX excretion (microg/mmol creatinine) was measured in the morning and afternoon in 22 stable asthmatics and in 16 nonatopic, nonasthmatic controls to investigate circadian variation. Additionally, EPX excretion in the afternoon was analysed in 21 children with chronic asthma before and after 6 weeks of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids, and in seven children within 24 h of admission due to an asthma exacerbation and again 3 months after discharge. RESULTS: EPX excretion in the first morning urine sample of the day compared with the afternoon urine sample was significantly higher both in children with asthma (n = 22; mean +/- standard deviation: 179.7 +/- 97.3 vs 60.9 +/- 40.7 microg/mmol creatinine, P = 0.0001) and in nonatopic nonasthmatic controls (n = 16; 114.5 +/- 57.1 vs 53.4 +/- 29.0 microg/mmol creatinine, P = 0.0001). EPX excretion decreased significantly after 6 weeks of anti-inflammatory treatment in the group of children with chronic asthma (n = 21; 124.7 +/- 84.6 vs 87. 5 +/- 61.9 microg/mmol creatinine, P = 0.02) and in the group of children with an acute asthma exacerbation 3 months after discharge (n = 7; 233.2 +/- 174.5 vs 75.8 +/- 59.5 microg/mmol creatinine, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This study suggests a circadian variation of EPX excretion in children with asthma and in nonatopic, nonasthmatic controls. Measurement of EPX excretion is helpful monitoring therapy in asthmatic children if circadian variation is considered.     

Role of FEF25%-75% as a predictor of bronchial hyperreactivity in allergic patients.

BACKGROUND: The small airways may play an important role in the clinical manifestations of asthma. Forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% (FEF25%-75%) has been proposed as an approximate measure of the caliber of distal airways. Bronchial hyperreactivity (BHR) is a feature of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible role of FEF25%-75% as a predictor of BHR in allergic patients with asthma and rhinitis. METHODS: A total of 726 patients (mean +/- SD age, 24.7 +/- 6.3 years) were evaluated. Spirometry and methacholine bronchial challenge were evaluated in all the participants. RESULTS: A difference between forced expiratory volume in 1 second and FEF25%-75% greater than 20 or a ratio between these variables greater than 1.24 discriminates between patients with no response to a mild response to methacholine vs patients with a moderate-to-severe response with high sensitivity (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the possible role of FEF25%-75% in predicting BHR in allergic individuals with airway disorders.     

Relationship between nasal and bronchial responsiveness in perennial allergic rhinitic patients with asthma

BACKGROUND: The nasal and bronchial mucosa present similarities and most patients with asthma also have rhinitis, suggesting the concept of 'one airway one disease'. Although many studies may suggest the relationship between nasal and bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, few studies have been published which address this question directly. The aim of this study is to investigate whether the relationship between nonspecific nasal and bronchial responsiveness exists in perennial allergic rhinitic patients with asthma. METHODS: Fifty-one perennial allergic rhinitic patients with the definitive or suspected asthma underwent methacholine bronchial provocation tests and nasal histamine challenge tests. A slope of the absolute changes in nasal symptoms score/log concentrations of histamine was calculated by linear regression analysis. A ratio of the final absolute change in nasal symptoms score to the sum of all the doses of histamine given to the subject was also calculated. The degree of bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was categorized as positive bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) if PC(20) (provocative concentration of methacholine resulting in 20% fall in FEV(1)) was <4 mg/ml, borderline BHR if PC(20) was >or=4 but 16 mg/ml. Another index of bronchial responsiveness (BRindex) was calculated as the log [(% decline in FEV(1)/log final methacholine concentration as mg/dl) + 10]. RESULTS: The geometric means of the slope (4.47 vs. 2.95, p < 0.05) and the ratio (1.68 vs. 0.54, p < 0.01) were higher in patients with positive BHR (n = 23) than in patients with negative BHR (n = 19), respectively. The geometric means of the slope (3.50) and the ratio (1.13) in patients with borderline BHR (n = 9) were between the two groups, respectively. In all patients, the log-slope (r = 0.48, p < 0.001) and the log-ratio (r = 0.51, p < 0.001) were correlated well with the BRindex, respectively. Even in allergic rhinitic patients with definitive asthma, the log-slope was correlated with the BRindex (r = 0.39, p < 0.05) or log-PC(20) (r = -0.36, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The nonspecific nasal responsiveness may be related to the nonspecific bronchial responsiveness in patients with allergic rhinitis and asthma, which may support the viewpoint that allergic rhinitis and asthma represent a continuum of inflammation involving one common airway.     

Effect of immunotherapy on asthma progression, BHR and sputum eosinophils in allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation are frequently associated with allergic rhinitis, and may be important risk factors for the development of asthma. Specific immunotherapy (SIT) reduces symptom in subjects with allergic rhinitis, but the mechanisms are not clear. AIMS OF THE STUDY: To assess the effect of Parietaria-SIT on asthma progression, rhinitic symptoms, BHR, and eosinophilic inflammation. METHODS: Nonasthmatic subjects with seasonal rhinitis were randomly assigned to receive Parietaria pollen vaccine (n = 15) or matched placebo (n = 15). Data on symptoms and medication score, BHR to methacholine, eosinophilia in sputum were collected throughout the 3-year study. RESULTS: By the end of the study, in the placebo group, symptoms and medication scores significantly increased by a median (interquartile range) of 121% (15-280) and 263% (0-4400) respectively (P < 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed in the SIT group. We found no significant changes in sputum eosinophils and BHR to methacholine in both groups throughout the study. Nine of 29 participants developed asthma symptoms during the study; of these, only two subjects (14%) in the SIT-treated group (P = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: Parietaria-SIT reduces symptom and rescue medication scores, but no changes in BHR to methacholine or sputum eosinophilia were observed. Moreover, Parietaria-SIT appears to prevent the natural progression of allergic rhinitis to asthma, suggesting that SIT should be considered earlier in the management of subjects with allergic rhinitis.     

Effect of current exposure to Der p 1 on asthma symptoms, airway inflammation, and bronchial hyperresponsiveness in mite-allergic asthmatics

The existence of a dose-response relationship between indoor allergen exposure and sensitization has been widely described, but the effect of allergen exposure on asthma activity (symptoms, bronchial hyperresponsiveness [BHR], and inflammation) is not clear. Our aim was to determine the existence of an association among current exposure to mite allergens and symptoms, BHR, and airway inflammation assessed in blood and sputum from asthmatic patients sensitized to Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus. We selected 31 mild and recently diagnosed (12-24 months) asthma patients sensitized to D. pteronyssinus. Allergenic exposure (Der p 1, Der 2) was assessed by a commercial assay based on monoclonal antibodies (mAb), carried out on the dust samples collected from patients' beds in a standardized way. Patients completed an asthma symptom questionnaire and underwent skin tests, methacholine bronchial challenge, and sputum induction. Sputum cell profile was analyzed and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, albumin, and interleukin(IL)-5 levels were quantified in sputum supernatant. Total eosinophil numbers and ECP levels were measured in blood samples. Most patients were exposed to Der p 1 levels under 2 microg/g of dust. Der p 1 exposure was higher among the subjects with positive sputum tryptase detection (P = 0.020). Der p 1 levels showed a trend toward correlation with asthma symptoms (P = 0.066, r = 0.36) and correlated with sputum tryptase levels (P = 0.032, r = 0.42). No relationship between BHR, eosinophilic inflammation, and allergenic exposure was found. Our results suggest that asthma symptoms and lung mast-cell activation are at least partially dependent on current allergen exposure. The lack of correlation between mite exposure, eosinophilic inflammation, and BHR supports the role of other factors that enhance the immunologic response initiated by allergen, increasing the activity of asthma.     

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness in young children with allergic rhinitis and its risk factors

BACKGROUND: Subjects with allergic rhinitis but no clinical evidence of asthma have greater bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), and several factors have been implicated as its determinants. However, studies in young children are lacking. The aims of this study were to evaluate the prevalence of BHR in young children with allergic rhinitis and to investigate its risk factors. METHODS: Methacholine bronchial challenges were performed in 4- to 6-year-old nonasthmatic children with allergic rhinitis (n = 83) and in healthy nonatopic controls (n = 32), using a modified auscultation method. The end-point was defined as the appearance of wheezing and/or oxygen desaturation. Subjects were considered to have BHR when they had end-point concentrations of methacholine 相似文献   

Relationship between anti-IgE autoantibody and severity of bronchial asthma

To determine whether anti-IgE autoantibody (aIgE) is involved in modulating allergic asthma, we examined the relationship between the titers of aIgE and severity of asthma in 63 allergic asthmatics. The titer of aIgE in patients' sera was 14.4 +/- 17.9 units (mean +/- SD). Thirty-one patients had aIgE greater than 5 units (26.4 +/- 22.1 units), whereas 32 patients had aIgE less than 5 units (2.0 +/- 0.9 units). Patients with high aIgE (greater than 5 units) were less severe than those with low aIgE (less than 5 units) (1.65 +/- 0.42 and 2.19 +/- 0.52 of severity score, respectively; p less than 0.01). There was an inverse correlation between the titers of aIgE and the severity scores (r = -0.328; p less than 0.01). Patients with high aIgE also had lower bronchial reactivity to methacholine than those with low aIgE (556 +/- 292 and 170 +/- 182 micrograms/ml of threshold dose of inhaled methacholine, respectively; p less than 0.005). There was a significant correlation between the titers of aIgE and the threshold dose of methacholine (r = 0.499; p less than 0.01). These findings suggest that aIgE plays a protective role in bronchial hyperreactivity in allergic asthma.     

Is nasal polyposis a determinant of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and altered quality of life in asthmatic subjects? A case-control study

Asthmatic patients with nasal polyposis (NP) have been reported to have a high prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and a worsening of quality of life (QoL). The aim of this case-control study was to evaluate if NP is a determinant of BHR and is responsible for modifying the QoL in asthmatic subjects. Eighty-nine asthmatic subjects, including 24 patients with NP and 65 patients without NP (controls), underwent spirometry, methacholine challenge test (MCHt), skin prick tests, and were evaluated with the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ). Results of the MCHt test are expressed as the provocative concentration of methacholine that causes 20% (PC20) fall of forced expiratory volume at 1 sec (FEV1). The PC20 (mean +/- SD) in NP cases was 1149 +/- 668 microg/ml vs 894 +/- 691 microg/ml in controls (p <0.001). This demonstrates that BHR was not enhanced by the presence of NP in asthmatic subjects. No significant differences were found between the NP cases and controls for overall QoL or for single QoL domains. This study shows that the presence of NP did not impair the QoL of asthmatic patients, as indicated by the items included in the AQLQ questionnaire.     

Airway inflammation in asthma and perennial allergic rhinitis. Relationship with nonspecific bronchial responsiveness and maximal airway narrowing

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic airway inflammation is the hallmark of asthma, but it has also been reported in other conditions such as allergic rhinitis. We have tested whether the analysis of cells and chemicals in sputum can distinguish between patients with mild allergic asthma, those with allergic rhinitis, and healthy controls. The relationship between inflammation markers in sputum and nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness to methacholine (BHR) (PD20 and maximal response plateau [MRP] values) was also evaluated. METHODS: We selected 31 mild asthmatics and 15 rhinitis patients sensitized to house-dust mite. As a control group, we studied 10 healthy subjects. Every subject underwent the methacholine bronchial provocation test (M-BPT) and sputum induction. Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were measured. Sputum cell differentials were assessed, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, albumin, and interleukin (IL)-5 levels were measured in the entire sputum supernatant. RESULTS: Blood eosinophils and serum ECP levels were higher in asthma patients and rhinitis than in healthy controls, but no difference between asthma patients and rhinitis patients was found. Asthmatics had higher eosinophil counts and higher ECP and tryptase levels in sputum than rhinitis patients or control subjects. Sputum albumin levels were higher in asthmatics than in controls. Rhinitis patients exhibited higher sputum eosinophils than healthy controls. An association between sputum eosinophil numbers and MPR values (r= -0.57) was detected, and a trend toward correlation between sputum ECP levels and PD20 values (r= -0.47) was found in the rhinitis group, but not in asthmatics. No correlation between blood eosinophilic inflammation and lung functional indices was found. CONCLUSIONS: Induced sputum is an accurate method to study bronchial inflammation, allowing one to distinguish between rhinitis patients and mildly asthmatic patients. The fact that no relationship was detected between sputum inflammation and BHR suggests that other factors, such as airway remodeling, may be at least partly responsible for BHR in asthma.     

Sublingual immunotherapy abrogates seasonal bronchial hyperresponsiveness in children with Parietaria-induced respiratory allergy: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The use of immunotherapy in asthmatic children is still controversial. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) may represent an advance, due to the good safety profile, but little is known about its effects on lung function and nonspecific bronchial responsiveness. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of SLIT on these parameters, in children with Parietaria pollen-induced asthma. METHODS: Thirty children with asthma solely due to Parietaria who participated in a previous randomized, placebo-controlled trial with SLIT were studied: pulmonary function test and methacholine challenge were carried out at baseline in winter 1999 (out season), during the 1999 season (before randomization), and during the 2001 season. RESULTS: Before randomization, there was a significant fall in methacholine provocation concentration during the pollen season vs baseline in both groups (SLIT group 9.78 +/- 5.95 mg/ml vs 3.37 +/- 2.99 mg/ml; placebo 8.70 +/- 6.25 mg/ml vs 2.44 +/- 2.25 mg/ml; P =.005). In the second pollen season, the response to methacholine returned to baseline values in the active group (9.10 +/- 7.7 mg/ml; P = NS vs baseline), whereas in the placebo group a significant increase in reactivity was still present (2.46 +/- 2.26; P = 0.008 vs baseline). No significant difference in FEV(1) and FEF(25-75) between the two groups was observed at all times. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that SLIT abrogates the seasonal bronchial hyperreactivity in children with asthma due to Parietaria. This may be regarded as an indirect evidence of the effect on bronchial inflammation.     

The Association of Lung Function,Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness,and Exhaled Nitric Oxide Differs Between Atopic and Non-atopic Asthma in Children

Purpose

Although many previous studies have attempted to identify differences between atopic asthma (AA) and non-atopic asthma (NAA), they have mainly focused on the difference of each variable of lung function and airway inflammation. The aim of this study was to evaluate relationships between lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), and the exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) levels in children with AA and NAA.

Methods

One hundred and thirty six asthmatic children aged 5-15 years and 40 normal controls were recruited. Asthma cases were classified as AA (n=100) or NAA (n=36) from skin prick test results. Lung function, BHR to methacholine and adenosine-5''-monophosphate (AMP), eNO, blood eosinophils, and serum total IgE were measured.

Results

The AA and NAA cases shared common features including a reduced small airway function and increased BHR to methacholine. However, children with AA showed higher BHR to AMP and eNO levels than those with NAA. When the relationships among these variables in the AA and NAA cases were evaluated, the AA group showed significant relationships between lung function, BHR to AMP or methacholine and eNO levels. However, the children in the NAA group showed an association between small airway function and BHR to methacholine only.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the pathogenesis of NAA may differ from that of AA during childhood in terms of the relationship between lung function, airway inflammation and BHR.     

Corticosteroid resistance in mild asthma: markers of persistent inflammation.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is an important feature of asthma. Glucocorticosteroids (GCS) reduce BHR, probably by suppressing allergic inflammation. There are, however, two groups of asthmatics with either GCS-responsive or non-responsive BHR to methacholine. We investigated the mechanism of non-GCS-responsive BHR in mild asthma. METHODS: Non-GCS-responsive BHR asthma was defined as failure of reduction of BHR to methacholine after a 2-week course of oral prednisolone (30 mg/day). The expression of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IFN-gamma mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, eosinophil count, serum cortisol, eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), and spirometry were measured in five non-GCS-responsive BHR asthmatics and six patients with GCS-responsive BHR asthma before and after prednisolone therapy. RESULTS: With the exception of serum ECP and expression of IL-5 mRNA, no significant differences were observed between GCS-responsive BHR and non-GCS-responsive BHR asthma. The mean ECP level was significantly higher in non-GCS-responsive BHR than in GCS-responsive BHR asthma before and after prednisolone therapy. Interleukin-5 mRNA was detected in all asthmatics before prednisolone therapy; however, after prednisolone therapy, IL-5 mRNA was only detected in non-GCS-responsive BHR asthmatics. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that activation of eosinophils appears to persist in some asthmatics with non-GCS-responsive BHR due to continuous IL-5 production by lymphocytes.     

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation in adolescents with asymptomatic childhood asthma

BACKGROUND: About 70% of childhood asthmatics become free of asthma-related symptoms during adolescence. Little is known about bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and airway inflammation in young adults with "outgrown" childhood asthma. METHODS: We studied 61 nonsmoking medical students (18 intermittent mild asthmatics, 23 students with outgrown childhood asthma but free of asthma-related symptoms for 10 years (asymptomatic asthmatics) and 20 healthy students). BHR and lung function were measured, and induced sputum samples analyzed for eosinophil count, eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). RESULTS: BHR was still present in most asymptomatic asthmatics, but it was milder compared with healthy students. Only three subjects with previous asthma had no BHR and no signs of airway inflammation. Percentages of eosinophil, and ECP, TNF-alpha and GM-CSF concentrations in induced sputum of mild asthmatics and asymptomatic asthma groups were higher than in the healthy group. In asymptomatic asthmatics group, the duration of asthma, sputum eosinophil percentage, and the level of TNF-alpha in sputum correlated significantly with BHR. CONCLUSIONS: Only a few subjects with longstanding asymptomatic asthma could be considered as cured; most asymptomatic asthmatics continued to exhibit BHR and signs of airway inflammation. The outcome of childhood asthma and BHR was associated with the degree of airway inflammation and the duration of childhood asthma.