Evaluation of 12 Commercial Tests for Detection of Epstein-Barr Virus-Specific and Heterophile Antibodies

Ten microbiological departments in Norway have participated in a multicenter evaluation of the following commercial tests for detection of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-specific and heterophile antibodies: CAPTIA Select viral capsid antigen (VCA)-M/G/EBNA (Centocor Inc.), Enzygnost anti-EBV/immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG (Dade Behring), Vironostika EBV VCA IgM/IgG/EBNA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Organon Teknika), SEROFLUOR immunofluorescence assay and EBV Combi-Test (Institute Virion Ltd.), anti-EBV recombinant IgM- and IgG-early antigen/EBNA IgG ELISA (Biotest Diagnostics), EBV IgM/IgG/EBNA ELISA (Gull Laboratories), Paul-Bunnell-Davidsohn test (Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur), Monosticon Dri-Dot (Organon Teknika), Avitex-IM (Omega Diagnostics Ltd.), Alexon Serascan infectious mononucleosis test (Alexon Biomedical Inc.), Clearview IM (Unipath Ltd.), and Cards±OS Mono (Pacific Biotech, Inc.). The test panel included sera from patients with primary EBV infection, immunocompromised patients with recent cytomegalovirus infection, healthy persons (blood donors), and EBV-seronegative persons. Among the tests for EBV-specific antibodies the sensitivity was good, with only small differences between the different assays. However, there was a greater variation in specificity, which varied between 100% (Enzygnost) and 86% (Biotest). Tests for detection of heterophile antibodies based on purified or selected antigen (Avitex, Alexon, Clearview IM, and Cards±OS Mono) were more sensitive than the Paul-Bunnell-Davidsohn and Monosticon tests.     

Evaluation of four commercial systems for the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus primary infections

To compare the performance of four diagnostic commercial systems for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology (for IgM and IgG virus capsid antigen [VCA] and EBV nuclear antigen [EBNA] antibodies), a collection of 125 samples from clinically suspected infectious mononucleosis cases was studied. Indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) for VCA IgM and IgG antibodies and anticomplement immunofluorescence for EBNA antibodies (Meridian Bioscience Inc.) were used as reference methods. By these methods, the cases were classified EBV primary infection (presence of IgM to VCA or IgG to VCA in the absence of EBNA antibodies; n = 82), EBV past infection (presence of VCA IgG and EBNA antibodies in the absence of VCA IgM; n = 26), or no infection (negative for the three markers; n = 17). The following systems were tested: two chemiluminescent immunoassays (CLIAs; the Liason [CLIA-L; DiaSorin] and the Immulite 2000 [CLIA-I; Siemens]), immunofiltration (IF; All.Diag), and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; DiaSorin). In the IgM assays, sensitivities ranged from 67.1% (ELISA) to 92.2% (CLIA-L) and specificities ranged from 93.8% (CLIA-L) to 100% (IF). In the VCA IgG assays, sensitivities varied from 79.4% (IF) to 94.4% (CLIA-I) and specificities varied from 94.4% (IF and CLIA-L) to 100% (CLIA-I and ELISA). In EBNA assays, sensitivities ranged from 78.1% (IF) to 93.8% (CLIA-I) and specificities ranged from 32.3% (CLIA-L) to 91.4% (IF). In relation to EBV profiles, the corresponding figures for sensitivity (in detecting primary infection) for IF, CLIA-L, CLIA-I, and ELISA were 92.7%, 93.8%, 89%, and 89.6%, respectively, and those for specificity (to exclude primary recent infection) were 90.7%, 94.6%, 97.7%, and 95.2%, respectively. Although there were limitations in some individual markers, especially CLIA-L for EBNA IgG, the systems evaluated appear to be useful for diagnosis of EBV infection.     

Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection by novel ELISAs based on recombinant capsid antigens p23 and p18

A new pair of Epstein-Barr virus ELISAs (Biotest Anti-EBV VCA IgG and VCA IgM ELISA) was evaluated for usefulness for routine diagnosis of acute EBV infections. The ELISAs are based on two viral capsid antigens (VCA), p23 (BLRF2, full-length) and p18 (BFRF3, carboxy-half), that are combined by autologous gene fusion. In total, 179 sera were tested in direct comparison with classical VCA immunofluorescence assays (IFA). With the help of clinical data and additional reference serology, i.e., heterophile antibodies, anti-EA IgG (IFA) and anti-EBNA-1 IgG (ELISA), the patients were divided into the following categories: seronegatives (46), acute primary infections (67), previous infections (39), suspected reactivations (20) and constellations with intermediate serological patterns (7). The VCA IgG and VCA IgM ELISAs showed overall agreement to IFA of 95.0% and 94.4%, respectively. The calculated analytical performance (sensitivity; specificity) of VCA IgG and VCA IgM was 94.0%; 97.8% and 97.1%; 96.5%, respectively. A certain delay in seroconversion of anti-p23-p18 IgG may account for a significant difference in sensitivity of the VCA IgG ELISA between primary (88.4%) and previous infections (100%). In summary, the new recombinant VCA ELISAs yielded good correlation to VCA IFA and in combination with EBNA-1 IgG allow rapid, sensitive, and specific diagnosis of infectious mononucleosis or EBV immune status in general.     

Serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection: Problems and solutions

Serological tests for antibodies specific for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antigens are frequently used to define infection status and for the differential diagnosis of other pathogens responsible for mononucleosis syndrome. Using only three parameters [viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgG, VCA IgM and EBV nuclear antigen (EBNA)-1 IgG],it is normally possible to distinguish acute from past infection: the presence of VCA IgM and VCA IgG without EBNA-1 IgG indicates acute infection, whereas the presence of VCA IgG and EBNA-1 IgG without VCA IgM is typical of past infection. However, serological findings may sometimes be difficult to interpret as VCA IgG can be present without VCA IgM or EBNA-1 IgG in cases of acute or past infection, or all the three parameters may be detected simultaneously in the case of recent infection or during the course of reactivation. A profile of isolated EBNA-1 IgG may also create some doubts. In order to interpret these patterns correctly, it is necessary to determine IgG avidity, identify anti-EBV IgG and IgM antibodies by immunoblotting, and look for heterophile antibodies, anti-EA (D) antibodies or viral genome using molecular biology methods. These tests make it possible to define the status of the infection and solve any problems that may arise in routine laboratory practice.     

Performance of Two Commercially Available Automated Immunoassays for the Determination of Epstein-Barr Virus Serological Status

This study evaluated the performance of two automated Vidas (V) and Liaison (L) immunoassays for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) serology. The detection of the viral capsid antigen (VCA) IgM, the VCA/early antigen (VCA/EA) IgG, and the Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA) IgG was assessed on 526 sera collected for routine EBV testing in immunocompetent subjects. The determination of expected EBV status (186 EBV primary infections, 183 past EBV infections, and 157 EBV-seronegative individuals) was based on results of routine laboratory enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) together with clinical data. The sensitivity and specificity of each individual marker were determined in comparison to the expected EBV status. The agreement between the V and L profiles and the expected EBV status was established through the interpretation of combinations of the different EBV markers. Statistically significant differences between the two tests were found for the specificity of the VCA IgM marker (96.2% for V versus 93.2% for L), the sensitivity of the VCA/EA IgG marker (89% for V versus 94% for L), and the specificity of the EBNA IgG marker (96.5% for V versus 74.2% for L). The results determined for the two assays with respect to overall agreement with the established expected EBV status were not significantly different (89.7% for V versus 88.2% for L), with discrepancies mainly observed in sera referenced as primary infections. These findings demonstrated the similar performances of the Vidas and the Liaison assays for the establishment of an EBV serological status using the VCA, EA, and EBNA markers.     

Seroepidemiology of EBV and interpretation of the “isolated VCA IgG” pattern

The presence of VCA IgG in the absence of VCA IgM and EBNA‐1 IgG antibodies makes classifying EBV infection more difficult as this serological picture can be seen in the case of past infection with EBNA‐1 IgG loss or non‐appearance, or acute infections with the early disappearance or delayed onset of VCA IgM. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of this pattern in 2,422 outpatients with suspected EBV infection examined in 2005–2006, and to interpret its significance by means of immunoblotting. One hundred and seventy‐seven (7.3%) of the patients were VCA IgG‐positive, VCA IgM‐negative and EBNA‐1 IgG‐negative, 15 of whom (8.5%) presented with heterophile antibodies. Analysis by age class showed that the prevalence of isolated VCA IgG ranged from 4.5% in the subjects aged 1–10 years to 9% in those aged >60 years. Immunoblotting allowed 18.9% of the cases to be classified as acute and 81.1% as past infections, the latter being observed in about 37% of the patients aged less than 10 years and in 100% of those aged >30 years. Therefore, in our case series, the presence of isolated VCA IgG was associated usually with past infection, particularly among adults. In children aged less than 10 years, it was associated mainly with acute infection but as past infection may be present in about one‐third of such children, this possibility should not be overlooked. J. Med. Virol. 81:325–331, 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Evaluation of Four Commercially Available Epstein-Barr Virus Enzyme Immunoassays with an Immunofluorescence Assay as the Reference Method

Four commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Novitec, Biotest, Virotech, and DiaSorin) were evaluated, with an indirect immunofluorescence assay as the reference method, for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) VCA (viral capsid antigen) immunoglobulin G (IgG), VCA IgM, or EBNA (EBV nuclear antigen) IgG at three different locations (Homburg, Stuttgart, and Dresden). Serum samples from 66 immunocompetent patients with infectious mononucleosis, 73 patients without prior EBV infection, and 96 patients with past EBV infections and 29 serum samples with possible cross-reactions to other herpesviruses were included. In addition, 25 samples from an extensively pretested panel that is commercially available (Boston Biomedica) were tested. Each sample was tested at only one location. The four EIAs varied considerably in performance. When analyzing for EBV diagnosis, the Novitec assay performed the best, with 4.9% discrepant diagnoses, followed by the Biotest, Virotech, and DiaSorin assays, with 6.8, 11.7, and 14.0% discrepant diagnoses, respectively. On the basis of single-parameter analysis, the Novitec assay also showed the lowest number of discrepant results, with 3.5%, compared with the Virotech, Biotest, and DiaSorin assays, which produced 5.4, 6.4, and 8.6% discrepant results, respectively. VCA assays using affinity-purified native antigens performed better than assays with recombinant or synthetic antigens. The synthetic EBNA-1s showed the lowest concordance with the reference compared to recombinant p72. Commercially available EBV EIAs differed considerably in performance; however, some proved to be reliable and convenient alternatives to the indirect immunofluorescence assay for routine diagnostics. Native antigens, rather than synthetic peptides, are favored for EBV serology testing.     

Evaluation of four commercially available Epstein-Barr virus enzyme immunoassays with an immunofluorescence assay as the reference method

Four commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) (Novitec, Biotest, Virotech, and DiaSorin) were evaluated, with an indirect immunofluorescence assay as the reference method, for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) VCA (viral capsid antigen) immunoglobulin G (IgG), VCA IgM, or EBNA (EBV nuclear antigen) IgG at three different locations (Homburg, Stuttgart, and Dresden). Serum samples from 66 immunocompetent patients with infectious mononucleosis, 73 patients without prior EBV infection, and 96 patients with past EBV infections and 29 serum samples with possible cross-reactions to other herpesviruses were included. In addition, 25 samples from an extensively pretested panel that is commercially available (Boston Biomedica) were tested. Each sample was tested at only one location. The four EIAs varied considerably in performance. When analyzing for EBV diagnosis, the Novitec assay performed the best, with 4.9% discrepant diagnoses, followed by the Biotest, Virotech, and DiaSorin assays, with 6.8, 11.7, and 14.0% discrepant diagnoses, respectively. On the basis of single-parameter analysis, the Novitec assay also showed the lowest number of discrepant results, with 3.5%, compared with the Virotech, Biotest, and DiaSorin assays, which produced 5.4, 6.4, and 8.6% discrepant results, respectively. VCA assays using affinity-purified native antigens performed better than assays with recombinant or synthetic antigens. The synthetic EBNA-1s showed the lowest concordance with the reference compared to recombinant p72. Commercially available EBV EIAs differed considerably in performance; however, some proved to be reliable and convenient alternatives to the indirect immunofluorescence assay for routine diagnostics. Native antigens, rather than synthetic peptides, are favored for EBV serology testing.     

Single-assay combination of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) EBNA1- and viral capsid antigen-p18-derived synthetic peptides for measuring anti-EBV immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibody levels in sera from nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: options for field screening

Assessment of immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody responses to various Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antigen complexes, usually involving multiple serological assays, is important for the early diagnosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Through combination of two synthetic peptides representing immunodominant epitopes of EBNA1 and viral capsid antigen (VCA)-p18 we developed a one-step sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the specific detection of EBV reactive IgG and IgA antibodies in NPC patients (EBV IgG/IgA ELISA). Sera were obtained from healthy donors (n = 367), non-NPC head and neck cancer patients (n = 43), and biopsy-proven NPC patients (n = 296) of Indonesian and Chinese origin. Higher values of optical density at 450 nm for EBV IgG were observed in NPC patients compared to the healthy EBV carriers, but the large overlap limits its use for NPC diagnosis. Using either EBNA1 or VCA-p18 peptides alone IgA ELISA correctly identified 88.5% and 79.8% of Indonesian NPC patients, with specificities of 80.1% and 70.9%, whereas combined single-well coating with both peptides yielded sensitivity and specificity values of 90.1 and 85.4%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) for the combined EBNA1 plus VCA EBV IgA ELISA were 78.7% and 93.9%, respectively. In the Indonesia panel, the level of EBV IgA reactivity was not associated with NPC tumor size, lymph node involvement, and metastasis stage, sex, and age group. In the China panel the sensitivity/specificity values were 86.2/92.0% (EBNA1 IgA) and 84.1/90.3% (VCA-p18 IgA) for single-peptide assays and 95.1/90.6% for the combined VCA plus EBNA1 IgA ELISA, with a PPV and an NPV for the combined EBV IgA ELISA of 95.6 and 89.3%, respectively. Virtually all NPC patients had abnormal anti-EBV IgG diversity patterns as determined by immunoblot analysis. On the other hand, healthy EBV carriers with positive EBV IgA ELISA result showed normal IgG diversity patterns. By using EBV IgG immunoblot diversity as confirmation assay for EBV IgA ELISA-positive samples, the sensitivity and specificity for NPC diagnosis increased to 98% and 99.2%, respectively, in the Indonesian NPC samples. The use of these combined methods for seroepidemiological screening studies is proposed.     

Screening of blood donors for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) IgG antibody with an enzyme immunoassay using recombinant antigens.

BACKGROUND: Screening of blood donors for human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) infection is usually performed by the combined detection of specific IgG and IgM antibody. However, in most of the cases of primary infection HCMV IgG seroconversion is observed concomitantly to IgM production and HCMV IgM antibody detection for blood donor screening is subject to a relatively high frequency of false positive results. OBJECTIVE: In the present study a newly established HCMV IgG ELISA based on recombinant antigens (anti-HCMV recombinant IgG ELISA, Biotest) was evaluated in terms of sensitivity and specificity for blood donor screening. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 442 serum samples including follow-up sera of five patients suffering from primary HCMV infection, selected seropositive and seronegative blood donors and routine specimens were comparatively investigated with three HCMV antibody ELISAs (anti-HCMV recombinant IgG ELISA, Biotest; Enzygnost anti-CMV/IgG + IgM, Dade Behring; and Captia CMV-TA, Centocor). RESULTS: IgG seroconversion was detected with anti-HCMV recombinant IgG ELISA as early as IgM in all five patients suffering from primary infection. The alternative ELISAs were less sensitive, detecting seroconversion one to three bleeds later in 2 (Enzygnost anti-CMV/IgG + IgM) and 4 patients (Captia CMV-TA), respectively. Anti-HCMV recombinant IgG ELISA showed a 99.1% agreement with Enzygnost anti-CMV/IgG + IgM and/or Western blot in the preselected blood donors and routine specimens. Relatively high numbers of false negative (n=20) and positive results (n=7) were obtained with Captia CMV-TA. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggest that HCMV antibody screening of blood donors can be performed reliably by detection of specific IgG provided that a highly sensitive assay system is used.     

Evaluation of a multiplex fluorescent microsphere immunoassay for the determination of epstein-barr virus serologic status

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), a human herpesvirus, affects up to 95% of adults. Diagnosis of acute EBV infection can be challenging and often relies on the serologic antibody pattern to 3 distinct antigens, most often determined by indirect fluorescent antibody (IFA), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), and, more recently, multiplex assays. We compared a multiplex assay for the simultaneous detection of antibodies to viral capsid (VCA), nuclear (EBNA), and early (EA) EBV antigens with ELISAs using IFA for discrepancy resolution. Concordance of the multiplex assay was good for all 4 antigens: VCA IgM, 86.6% vs ELISA and 92.9% vs IFA; VCA IgG, 92.8% vs ELISA and 98.0% vs IFA; EBNA IgG, 90.3% vs ELISA and 98.1% vs IFA; and EA IgG, 83.8% vs ELISA and 92.8% vs IFA. After IFA resolution, correlation between the multiplex assay and ELISA for serologic disease stage, based on the antibody profile of all 4 analytes, was 90%. The multiplex assay showed good correlation with an established ELISA and even better correlation with the "gold standard" IFA. Advantages of the multiplex assay over traditional methods include multiple results per assay, inclusion of internal controls for each assay, and well-to-well monitoring of assay drift.     

Coupled particle light scattering: a new technique for serodiagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus infection

The Coupled Particle Light Scattering technique was evaluated for serological diagnosis of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) infection. Two hundred ninety-six patient sera selected from several clinical categories (acute infection, non-primary infection, interfering non-EBV infection, non-infected) were tested for IgM and IgG antibodies (anti-VCA, anti-EBNA and anti-EA). Determination of EBV IgG with Copalis multiplex was accurate when compared with Enzygnost Anti-EBV/IgG ELISA. Although the sensitivity of Copalis IgM for acute infections was 100% a positive IgM result did not always indicate an acute infection. Strong reactivity to IgG EA (ratio 3, 1) and IgG VCA (ratio 13, 3) correlated with persistent infection or reactivation. The CopalisI has many advantages over the existing methods, such as the possibility to measure three semi-quantitative IgG responses to three different EBV antigens simultaneously.     

The seroepidemiology of infection due to Epstein-Barr virus in southern India

We investigated the seroepidemiology of infection due to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) in 181 south Indian subjects aged 0-25 years using the indirect immunofluorescence method to titrate antibodies to viral capsid antigen (VCA), nuclear antigen (EBNA), and early antigen (EA). The age-specific prevalence of IgG antibodies to VCA rose rapidly to 90% by the age of 5 years. The prevalence of VCA-specific IgM and the geometric mean titre of VCA-specific IgG antibodies were highest between the ages of 6 months and 2 years, the median age of primary infection being 1.4 years. Thus primary EBV infection occurs early in life. EA antibody prevalence was highest (55%) in the third year of life and remained between 30% and 40% thereafter. This pattern of EA antibody prevalence suggests that the latent EBV infection that persists lifelong after primary infection may be reactivated in many individuals. EBNA antibody prevalence was low until the age of 2 years but rose to 80% in the fourth year. Geometric mean titres of antibodies to EA and EBNA were low and stable at all ages. These results are similar to data from areas where EBV-associated Burkitt's lymphoma is endemic and indicate a high EBV infection load early in life.     

Synthetic peptides deduced from the amino acid sequence of Epstein-Barr virus nuclear antigen 6 (EBNA 6): Antigenic properties,production of monoreactive reagents,and analysis of antibody responses in man

Studies on the antibody responses to various Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) antigens have been instrumental in the understanding of the seroepidemiology and diagnosis of this viral infection and the subsequent carrier state. While antibodies to the viral capsid antigen (VCA), early antigen (EA), and nuclear antigens 1 and 2 (EBNA 1 and 2) have been well characterized, the antibody response to the other nuclear antigens is not well understood. EBNA 6 is expressed by lymphoblasts during acute EBV infection and may be an important antigen for diagnosis and evaluation of the immune response. In order to analyze the antibody response to EBNA 6, ten peptides (20–21 amino acids), deduced from the EBNA 6 coding region, were synthesized and evaluated for antigenicity by ELISA. One peptide (p-63; PA-PQAPYQGYQEPPAPQAPY) derived from the amino acid repeats showed the highest specific reactivity with human sera. This peptide was evaluated further for detection of human EBNA 6-reactive antibodies. Forty-two of forty-nine (86%) EBV-seropositive healthy donors had p-63- specific IgG reactivity, while none of 50 EBV seronegative patients reacted with the p-63 peptide. Twenty-two of fifty-one (43%) patients with ongoing primary EBV infection had detectable p-63-specific IgG. Serum samples drawn sequentially from patients during and after primary EBV infection revealed an increase in p-63-reactive IgG over time. A similar pattern was found for reactivity with an EBNA I-specific peptide (p-107), in contrast to the EBNA 2 (polyproline) response, which decreased over time. Some EBV seropositive individuals who had no detectable IgG against peptide p-63 did have antibodies against the native EBNA 6 by anticomplement immunofluorescence to EBNA 6 transfected cells. Rabbit antiserum raised against p-63 reacted specifically with native EBNA 6 by an immunofluorescence assay and by immunoblotting, indicating the EBNA 6-specific antigenicity of the peptide. Thus, the peptide p-63 derived from the amino acid repeats of the EBNA 6 coding region constitutes a predominant, although not exclusive, epitope in the EBNA 6 antibody response. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Assessment of rapid ELISA test for detection of Epstein-Barr virus infection.

A rapid test for the detection of IgM and IgG Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA-1) has been extensively marketed. If IgM to Epstein-Barr viral capsid antigen (EBV VCA) is taken as evidence of current EBV infection, one observer detected 17 of 38 such samples and the other 22 of 38 as acute. The positive predictive value of the test was 63%, and the greatest difficulty was posed by the detection of IgM EBV VCA positive, heterophile antibody negative samples. Significant false positive results were obtained in sera with evidence of current Toxoplasma gondii, cytomegalovirus, and adenovirus infection. Rheumatoid factor was not a problem. Modification of the test protocol improved its performance: the positive predictive value rose to 87% and the negative predictive value to 81%. Although our modifications did not increase the speed of the test, there was reliable information on the EBNA-1 state. The test is best used as an adjunct to other EBV serology, and laboratories should be aware of the limitations of the rapid test.     

Evaluation of five hepatitis delta virus marker assays for detection of antigen and antibody.

Five commercially available assays for hepatitis delta (HD) virus markers were compared for sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility: three assays for antibody (anti-HD), provided by Diagnostics Pasteur, Organon Teknika, and Abbott Laboratories, and two assays for antigen (HD Ag), from Pasteur and Organon Teknika. The assay from Organon Teknika is the less sensitive assay for anti-HD detection. Although the sensitivities of the Pasteur and Abbott assays for anti-HD detection are similar, the use of Abbott reagents is hampered by the lack of specificity when HD Ag is present. The greater sensitivity for HD Ag detection is obtained with Organon assay.     

应用基于Logistic回归的ROC曲线评价鼻咽癌EB病毒抗体联合检测

目的 以基于Logistic回归的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析方法,评价VCA/IgA、EA/IgA、Rta/IgG和EBNA1/IgA等EB病毒抗体不同组合在鼻咽癌诊断中的价值.方法 收集211例初治鼻咽癌和203例相似症状的非鼻咽癌病例的血清,采用免疫酶法检测VCA/IgA及EA/IgA,酶联免疫吸附法检测Rta/lgG和EBNA1/IgA.对各种的抗体组合建立Logistic回归模型,以预测概率为分析指标,应用ROC曲线分析,评价不同组合对鼻咽癌的诊断价值.结果 单一指标评价,VCA/IgA敏感度最高(98.1%),EA/IgA特异度最高(98.5%).以基于Logistic同归的ROC曲线分析各项组合,敏感度和特异度均有所提高.双指标组合中,VCA/IgA+Rta/lgG组合的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.991,诊断效能最高,敏感度、特异度及约登指数分别为94.8%、98.0%及0.928.VCA/IgA+Rta/IgG+EBNA1/IgA组合和4项指标组合的敏感度、特异度及约登指数分别为94.8%、98.5%、0.933和96.7%、97.0%、0.937;这两种多指标组合的AUC与VCA/IgA+Rta/IgG组合比较差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 基于Logistic回归的ROC曲线分析方法可以为多指标联合诊断试验提供更客观的综合分析,VCA/IgA和Rta/IgG联合检测具有互补作用,是鼻咽癌血清学诊断的合适组合.     

Epstein–Barr virus can infect rabbits by the intranasal or peroral route: An animal model for natural primary EBV infection in humans

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) is spread universally in humans, and it causes infectious mononucleosis and sometimes induces serious EBV‐associated disease. The detailed mechanism of primary infection in humans has remained unclear, because it is difficult to examine the dynamics of EBV in vivo. In this study, a natural EBV‐infection rabbit model by intranasal or peroral inoculation is described. Ten male rabbits were examined for EBV‐DNA or mRNA expression and anti‐EBV antibodies in blood. Four of 10 rabbits showed the evidence of EBV infection; detection of EBV‐DNA or EBV‐related genes mRNA in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, increased EBV antibodies in the plasma, and the presence of lymphocytes expressing EBER1 and EBV‐related gene proteins in the lymphoid tissues of a rabbit. Three of four infected rabbits were detected transiently EBV‐DNA and/or mRNA of EBV‐related genes such as EBNA1, EBNA2, BZLF1, and EA in blood, while in one of four, EBV‐DNA and/or mRNA were detected for more than 200 days after viral inoculation. The level of EA‐IgG increased and its level was maintained in all infected rabbits, whereas those of VCA‐IgM and VCA‐IgG increased transiently, and EBNA‐IgG was not elevated. Pathological examination of a rabbit infected transiently revealed some scattered lymphocytes expressing EBER1, LMP1, and EBNA2 in the spleen and lymph nodes. EA expression was also observed in the spleen. These findings suggest that EBV can infect the rabbit by the intranasal or peroral route, and that this rabbit model is useful for examining the pathophysiology of natural primary EBV infection in humans. J. Med. Virol. 82:977–986, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Comparison of three different serological techniques for primary diagnosis and monitoring of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in two age groups from Tunisia

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in Tunisia is characterized by its bimodal age distribution involving juvenile patients of 10-24 years and adult patients of 40-60 years. Three serological techniques were compared for primary diagnosis (N = 117) and post-treatment monitoring (N = 21) of NPC patients separated in two age groups. Immunofluorescence assay (IFA) was used as the "gold standard" for detection of IgG and IgA antibodies reactive with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) early (EA) and viral capsid (VCA) antigens. Results were compared with ELISA measuring IgG and IgA antibody reactivity to defined EBNA1, EA, and VCA antigens. Immunoblot was used to reveal the molecular diversity underlying the anti-EBV IgG and IgA antibody responses. The results indicate that young NPC patients have significantly more restricted anti-EBV IgG and IgA antibody responses with aberrant IgG VCA/EA levels in 78% compared to 91.7% in elder patients. IgA VCA/EA was detected in 50% of young patients versus 89.4% for the elder group (P < 0.001). Immunoblot revealed a reduced overall diversity of EBV antigen recognition for both IgG and IgA in young patients. A good concordance was observed between ELISA and IFA for primary NPC diagnosis with 81-91% overall agreement. Even better agreement (95-100%) was found for antibody changes during follow-up monitoring, showing declining reactivity in patients in remission and increasing reactivity in patients with persistent disease or relapse. ELISA for IgA anti-VCA-p18 and immunoblot proved most sensitive for predicting tumor relapse. VCA-p18 IgA ELISA seems suitable for routine diagnosis and early detection of NPC complication.     

Stress-related Epstein–Barr virus reactivation

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) remains latent in 90% of the patients following primary infection. The infection might be reactivated due to various stress factors. We, therefore, examined the levels of stress hormones (epinephrine, norepinephrine and cortisol), viral capsid antigen (VCA) immunoglobulin Ig G, VCA IgM, EBV early antigen IgG, Epstein–Barr nuclear antigen (EBNA) IgG, EBNA IgM antibody screening tests and performed EBV polymerized chain reaction (PCR) test and EBV DNA PCR in 100 draftees on their first day of recruitment and at the end of 1 month. Examination of the initial samples revealed that 94 (94%) subjects previously had EBV infection and 6 (6%) were seronegative. Second samples obtained at the end of first month showed that 7 (7.4%) reactivations occurred in 94 subjects who previously had EBV infection (P < 0.001). Two out of six (33.3%) who were initially seronegative had acute infection (P = 0.289). There was no significant difference between the median values of the levels of stress hormones in the initial and second serum and plasma samples. There was a significant difference between the rates of acute infection and reactivation among subjects with elevated cortisol and epinephrine levels in the second samples compared to subjects with normal levels (P < 0.001). No significant difference was determined between the first and second sample hormone levels of all nine subjects whose EBV-DNA turned positive. Routine examinations might not reveal any specific findings since EBV infection often has an asymptomatic course. EBV reactivations should always be kept in mind in patients subject to such stressful conditions.