New direct thrombin inhibitors

Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are a class of anticoagulants that bind selectively to thrombin and block its interaction with its substrates. Dabigatran etexilate and AZD0837, the new generation of DTIs, are now under intense development, and are potentially of great interest for internists. Dabigatran etexilate is a potent, non-peptidic small molecule that specifically and reversibly inhibits both free and clot-bound thrombin by binding to the active site of thrombin molecule. It has been already licensed in the European Union and in Canada for the prevention of VTE in patients undergoing hip- and knee-replacement surgery. Ongoing trials are evaluating its efficacy and safety for the treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, primary and secondary prevention of VTE, prevention of systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, and prevention of cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. AZD0837 is the prodrug of ARH06737, a potent, competitive, reversible inhibitor of free and fibrin-bound thrombin. At present, only limited, preclinical, phase I and phase II clinical data have been presented. The drug has now entered a phase III clinical program in the population of patients with atrial fibrillation. Their properties and the oral administration render these compounds, theoretically, more convenient than both vitamin K antagonist and low molecular weight heparins. However, only reports from clinical practice patterns over the next months and years will tell us how and when to use the new DTIs.     

Orally active direct thrombin inhibitors

Anticoagulants are widely used for the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thrombosis. Current treatment strategies often employ a combination of parenteral and oral agents because the only available orally active anticoagulants, vitamin K antagonists, have a delayed onset of action. Furthermore, vitamin K antagonists have a narrow therapeutic window that necessitates careful anticoagulation monitoring, and dosing is problematic because of multiple food and drug interactions. These limitations highlight the need for oral anticoagulants that produce a more predictable anticoagulant response than vitamin K antagonists, thereby obviating the need for laboratory monitoring. Ximelagatran has the potential to meet this need. A prodrug of melagatran, an agent that targets thrombin, ximelagatran exhibits many of the characteristics of an ideal anticoagulant. This article (1). reviews the limitations of vitamin K antagonists, (2). lists the characteristics of an ideal anticoagulant, (3). rationalizes thrombin as a target for new anticoagulants, (4). reviews the preclinical and clinical data with ximelagatran, and (5). provides clinical perspective as to the future of ximelagatran and other orally active anticoagulants currently under development.     

New anticoagulant agents: direct thrombin inhibitors

Decades of research have been devoted to developing effective, safe, and convenient anticoagulant agents. In recent years, much emphasis has been placed on the development of direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) that offer benefits over agents like heparin and warfarin including the inhibition of both circulating and clot-bound thrombin; a more predictable anticoagulant response, because they do not bind to plasma proteins and are not neutralized by platelet factor 4; lack of required cofactors, such as antithrombin or heparin cofactor II; inhibiting thrombin-induced platelet aggregation; and absence of induction of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Various injectable DTIs are currently available and used for many indications. In addition, research is now focusing on oral DTIs that seem promising and offer various advantages, such as oral administration, predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, a broad therapeutic window, no routine monitoring, no significant drug interactions, and fixed-dose administration.     

Oral direct thrombin inhibitors in clinical development

Thrombin has long been a target for development of oral anticoagulants but it has been difficult to find synthetic inhibitors with a desirable combination of pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. However, there are now two oral direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) in clinical development, ximelagatran (ExantaTM) and BIBR 1048. Both are prodrugs with two protecting groups that are eliminated after absorption from the gastrointestinal tract. Their main active substances, melagatran and BIBR 953, are both potent and selective DTIs. In experimental models of thrombosis, melagatran has been shown to have a shallower dose-response curve than warfarin and, therefore, a better separation between efficacy and bleeding. Oral bioavailability, measured as the plasma concentration of the active metabolite, seems to be higher for ximelagatran (20%) than for BIBR 1048 (estimated to 5%). BIBR 953 has a longer half-life (about 12 h) than does melagatran (3-5 h) after oral administration of BIBR 1048 and ximelagatran, respectively. Both melagatran and BIBR 953 are mainly eliminated via the renal route. The variability of the plasma concentration of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran is low. There are no clinically relevant interactions with food or cytochrome P450 metabolized drugs and ximelagatran. In clinical studies, ximelagatran has been administered in a twice-daily fixed-dose regimen without coagulation monitoring. Results of published clinical studies are encouraging, both with regard to efficacy and bleeding. Major indications in Phase III studies with ximelagatran are the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hip and knee replacement surgery, treatment and long-term secondary prevention of VTE and prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. It is anticipated that with a favourable outcome of the Phase III clinical studies new oral DTIs, with the oral fixed-dose regimen without routine coagulation monitoring, will ease the use of today's anticoagulant therapy.     

New anticoagulant agents: direct thrombin inhibitors

Decades of research have been devoted to developing effective, safe, and convenient anticoagulant agents. In recent years, much emphasis has been placed on the development of direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) that offer benefits over agents like heparin and warfarin including the inhibition of both circulating and clot-bound thrombin; a more predictable anticoagulant response, because they do not bind to plasma proteins and are not neutralized by platelet factor 4; lack of required cofactors, such as antithrombin or heparin cofactor II; inhibiting thrombin-induced platelet aggregation; and absence of induction of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Various injectable DTIs are currently available and used for many indications. In addition, research is now focusing on oral DTIs that seem promising and offer various advantages, such as oral administration, predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, a broad therapeutic window, no routine monitoring, no significant drug interactions, and fixed-dose administration.     

Monitoring of anticoagulant effects of direct thrombin inhibitors

Monitoring of direct thrombin inhibitors with the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is limited by poor linearity and reproducibility. Recently, direct prothrombin activation methods have been developed for coagulation analysis: ecarin clotting time (ECT) and prothrombinase-induced clotting time (PiCT). Laboratory monitoring of the direct thrombin inhibitors lepirudin, argatroban, and melagatran was analyzed and compared with monitoring unfractionated heparin (UFH). Plasma samples of six healthy donors were spiked with lepirudin and argatroban extending to 3000 ng/mL, melagatran extending to 1000 ng/mL, and UFH up to 0.48 IU/mL. Clotting times of aPTT (two reagents), ECT, PiCT, and prothrombin time were determined in a KC 10, a micro instrument. At 3000 ng/mL ECT values were 339.1 +/- 25.0 seconds with lepirudin and 457.5 +/- 29.5 seconds with argatroban. ECT was 586.0 +/- 38.2 seconds with 1000 ng/mL melagatran. The PiCT method provided clotting times of 137.0 +/- 8.4 seconds with UFH, 128.0 +/- 23.4 seconds with lepirudin, and 151 +/- 23.9 seconds with argatroban, and 153.5 +/- 9.9 seconds with melagatran, with the concentrations mentioned. ECT is more sensitive to therapeutic drug concentration ranges than aPTT (prolongations of 3-7 versus 2-3). PiCT yields comparable results with direct thrombin inhibitors and UFH. This method could therefore be suitable for monitoring both drug groups.     

Methods for the monitoring of direct thrombin inhibitors

Direct thrombin inhibitors are available for prophylactic as well as therapeutic purposes. Application of hirudin in therapeutic doses has been shown to require drug monitoring. Currently, most experience is available for recombinant hirudin, but the principle aspects of drug monitoring are the same for all direct thrombin inhibitors. Most frequently, activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and modifications of the activated clotting time (ACT) have been used for the monitoring of hirudin therapy. However, these methods are insensitive at plasma levels higher than 0.6 mg/L of hirudin, so that overdoses may be missed despite monitoring. Correlations between ecarin clotting time (ECT), enzyme immunoassays, and chromogenic substrate assays on one side and global tests on the other side are poor. Fully automated chromogenic substrate-based assays, also available as point-of-care tests (POCT), are more precise and sensitive and are not disturbed by interferents such as heparin and antithrombin. Good correlations can be observed between chromogenic assays and the ECT performed in plasma or whole blood samples. ECT can also be determined with POCT systems. Test characteristics such as imprecision and measuring range are comparable to those of the chromogenic assays. In conclusion, therapy with direct thrombin inhibitors should be monitored with chromogenic assays or ECT.     

Bivalent direct thrombin inhibitors: hirudin and bivalirudin

Hirudin derivatives (e.g. lepirudin, desirudin) and hirudin analogues (e.g. bivalirudin) are bivalent direct thrombin inhibitors; that is, they bind to two distinct sites on thrombin-its active (catalytic) site and its fibrinogen-binding site (exosite 1). These bivalent binding properties contribute to their high affinity and high specificity for thrombin. This review compares the pharmacological properties of these agents, and describes studies of their efficacy and safety in diverse clinical settings such as immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, postoperative antithrombotic prophylaxis, and treatment of acute coronary syndrome. Certain disadvantages of hirudin, such as its predominant renal excretion and immunogenicity, have been overcome through development of the hirudin analogue, bivalirudin. Compared with hirudin derivatives, bivalirudin exhibits a shorter half-life (25 vs 80 minutes), predominant non-renal (enzymic) metabolism, and low immunogenicity. Further work is required to define the scope of clinical thrombosis problems that could benefit from these novel agents.     

Clinical monitoring of hirudin and direct thrombin inhibitors.

In addition to heparin, the standard medication for prophylaxis and therapy of thromboembolism, several other substances have been developed and tested for clinical use with the aim of decreasing or eliminating side effects. Most of all, hirudin, a direct antithrombin (AT), has proved to be effective. To define the therapeutic range and to avoid underdosage or overdosage, clinical monitoring is necessary. For monitoring of hirudin, thrombin time (TT) is not suited because of the missing linearity of the standard curve. Activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) can be used only in the lower hirudin level range, where the standard curve is quite linear. However, high and toxic hirudin levels cannot be determined using aPTT. Another drawback is a high variation in single measurements and in the normal value of patients. Methods using chromogenic substrates are suited for determination of hirudin in plasma but cannot be used at bedside. Especially for monitoring of hirudin, the ecarin clotting time (ECT) was developed. The standard curve is linear over the entire concentration range. There are no influences by other coagulation parameters or anticoagulants. For both acute clinical situations and long-term monitoring, this method capable of point-of-care therapy (POCT) will be the method of choice.     

Anticoagulation strategies for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, and direct thrombin inhibitors

Low-molecular-weight heparins and direct thrombin inhibitors are emerging as alternative anticoagulants to unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This paper reviews the pharmacologic properties of these newer antithrombotic agents and evaluates the clinical data demonstrating their use in patients undergoing PCI.     

Development of direct thrombin inhibitors in comparison with glycosaminoglycans.

The progress in molecular biology has stimulated interest in the structure and function of thrombin. It has improved the understanding of its central role in thrombogenesis and has clarified the molecular events of inhibitor binding. This development has resulted in the production of recombinant hirudins and the design of hirudin analogues. It has also allowed the molecular design of synthetic antithrombins and encouraged the development of these products for clinical use. All pharmacological aspects speak in favor of the use of the direct thrombin inhibitors as antithrombotic agents, especially in the potential indications in which thrombin plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis. If their apparent advantages in comparison to glycosaminoglycans can be shown effectively, the direct thrombin inhibitors may become the drug of choice for certain indications.     

New synthetic antithrombotic agents for venous thromboembolism: pentasaccharides, direct thrombin inhibitors, direct Xa inhibitors

Heparin and low molecular weight heparins have limitations in their efficacy and safety for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). New synthetic antithrombotic drugs, designed with the intention of improving the therapeutic window for prophylaxis and treatment, are in various stages of development. Synthetic pentasaccharides include fondaparinux and its long-acting analogue idraparinux. Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor that has undergone clinical trials for VTE prophylaxis and treatment. Direct factor Xa inhibitors include rivaroxiban, which has shown promising results for VTE prophylaxis and is being studied for VTE treatment, as well as apixaban and betrixaban, which are at earlier stages of clinical validation. These newer agents may represent viable options for prophylaxis and therapy as further clinical studies are performed.     

A comparison of direct thrombin inhibitors in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: a single institution experience

Background and objective Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT), if left untreated, can lead to thrombocytopenia, thromboembolic complications and even death. Two thrombin inhibitors, lepirudin and argatroban, have been shown to improve clinical outcomes compared to historical controls in the management of HIT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the effects of lepirudin and argatroban in the management of HIT. Methods Adult subjects with a positive anti-heparin platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody test and >50% decrease in platelet count during the first 30 days of admission over a period of 2 years were included in the study. Patient demographics, platelet counts, choice of antithrombin therapy, occurrence of thrombosis, length of hospital stay, and date and cause of death, if applicable, were collected for each patient. Results Eighty-two patients met inclusion criteria: 41 patients did not receive any thrombin inhibitors after the diagnosis of HIT, 24 patients received lepirudin and 17 patients received argatroban. Subjects treated with a thrombin inhibitor were more likely to experience platelet count recovery (87.5% for the lepirudin group and 82.4% for the argatroban group) compared to those who did not receive antithrombin therapy (51.2%) after the diagnosis of HIT was made (P < 0.001). The thrombosis rate for subjects who did not receive antithrombin therapy after the diagnosis of HIT was 26.8%, compared to 8.3% for the lepirudin group and 5.9% for the argatroban group (P < 0.01). The incidence of death was also higher in the group of subjects that did not receive antithrombin therapy (48.8%) compared with the lepirudin group (16.7%) or the argatroban group (23.5%), P < 0.01. Conclusion Our findings suggest that thrombin inhibitors can improve the outcomes of patients with HIT by decreasing the incidence of morbidity and mortality relating to HIT. No significant difference could be determined in outcomes between argatroban and lepirudin therapy.     

The use of direct thrombin inhibitors in cardiovascular surgery in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

One of the most important adverse drug reactions that physicians encounter is the life- and limb-threatening prothrombotic syndrome known as heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Unfractionated heparin (UFH), administered during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), is highly immunogenic. Heparin-dependent antibodies can develop in 25 to 50% of UFH-treated cardiac surgery patients within 5 to 10 days. These antibodies can activate platelets and are considered the causative agents of HIT. HIT is a relatively common complication, occurring in 1 to 3% of cardiovascular surgery patients when UFH administration is continued postoperatively. It is strongly associated with new thromboembolic events leading to limb amputation and death. In acute or recent (< 100 days) HIT, alternative anticoagulatory regimens are needed during CPB surgery for prevention of HIT-related thrombosis. Treatment options for such patients now generally include the use of alternative anticoagulants such as lepirudin, bivalirudin, or danaparoid, as well as a combined treatment with platelet-function inhibitors and heparin. In patients with a history of HIT and no detectable antibodies, heparin is currently the safest approach for high-dose anticoagulation during CPB. Before and after surgery, however, alternative anticoagulants should be used. The risk of clinical HIT after heart surgery could potentially be reduced by using low-molecular-weight heparins for postsurgery anticoagulation.     

Novel antithrombotic agents: indirect synthetic inhibitors of factor Xa and direct thrombin inhibitors. Evidences from clinical studies

The optimal drugs employed in the antithrombotic treatment and prophylaxis have ideally been suggested to have high efficacy and safety and to be easy to use as regards the administration route and the fashion of monitoring the anticoagulant effect. A number of agents are under development in order to improve such requirements. Among them, the present review is focussed on a selective factor Xa inhibitor (pentasaccharide fondaparinux) and the direct thrombin inhibitors now available on a clinical ground. Fondaparinux is the first of a new class of selective antithrombin-dependent factor Xa inhibitors; it does not interact with plasma proteins other than antithrombin, leading to a predictable pharmacokinetics, which renders monitoring and dose adjustment unnecessary. The efficacy and safety of fondaparinux has been assessed in a number of clinical trials. In patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery, a 2.5 mg s.c administration once daily induced a 50% average relative risk reduction for overall venous thromboembolism in comparison with enoxaparin but also an increased rate of major bleeding. Parenteral direct thrombin inhibitors include hirudin, bivalirudin and argatroban. these inhibitors have been studied in patients with coronary heart disease. In particular, in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions, bivalirudin showed equivalent or higher efficacy but lower bleeding in comparison with unfractionated heparin. Another series of molecules capable of inhibiting thrombin is derived from the site of fibrinogen to which thrombin binds. Inogatran and melagatran have a low bioavailability when given orally, whereas the chemically modified prodrug ximelagatran has a higher bioavailability. Ximelagatran is safe and effective at least as low molecular weight heparin in patients undergoing major orthopaedic surgery and is safe and effective also in prevention of recurrence in patients with venous thromboembolism or myocardial infarction; ximelagatran is more effective than oral anticoagulants in prevention of arterial embolism due to atrial fibrillation, with comparable safety.     

Inhibition of endothelial cell-mediated generation of activated protein C by direct and antithrombin-dependent thrombin inhibitors.

The present study investigated the effect of the thrombin inhibitors antithrombin (AT) (with and without unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin), hirudin, inogatran and melagatran on thrombin-thrombomodulin-mediated generation of activated protein C (APC), in solution and on endothelial cells. Sequential incubation with thrombin, thrombin inhibitors and protein C was followed by measurement of APC by an amidolytic assay. The approximate concentrations resulting in 50% inhibition of endothelial cell-mediated APC generation for AT, AT-unfractionated heparin, AT-low molecular weight heparin, hirudin, melagatran and inogatran were 200, 4, 9, 1, 8 and 60 nmol/l, respectively. The normal plasma level of AT is 2800 nmol/l and relevant therapeutic concentrations from clinical trials are 200 nmol/l for hirudin, 500 nmol/l for melagatran and 1000 nmol/l for inogatran. The present study indicates that clinically relevant concentrations of the tested thrombin inhibitors interfere with endothelial-mediated APC generation, which may offer an explanation for the lack of a dose-response effect in clinical trials with thrombin inhibitors.