Cost-effectiveness of rituximab (MabThera) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in The Netherlands

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) vs. CHOP plus rituximab (R-CHOP) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients in the Netherlands. METHODS: A state transition model was developed to estimate the clinical course, costs and quality of life of patients with stage II, III or IV DLBCL receiving initial treatment with CHOP or R-CHOP to arrive at the ICER. The base year for the cost analysis was 2002 and was performed from the societal perspective. Only direct medical costs were included. The time horizon of the model was 15 yr and both costs and effects were discounted at 4%. Sensitivity analyses were performed to determine the effect of varying base-line assumptions of the model. RESULTS: The incremental gain in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) was 0.88 in both the younger and the older patient groups. The costs were 12 343 higher in the younger group of patients and 15 860 in the older patients. This resulted in an ICER of 13 983 for the younger and 17 933 for the older patients per QALY gained. These results were sensitive to the time horizon of the model, other variations had a marginal impact on the outcome. CONCLUSION: The addition of rituximab to standard therapy for DLBCL results in a gain of 0.88 QALYs. The ICER of 13 983 for younger and 17 933 for older patients per QALY gained should, seen in the light of disease severity, be considered acceptable by most policy makers in priority setting for budget allocation.     

Efficacy and tolerability of rituximab and reduced-dose cyclophosphamide,doxorubicin, vincristine,and prednisolone therapy for elderly patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Objectives: Chemoimmunotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone combined with rituximab (R-CHOP) is currently the first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, management of elderly patients is challenging and often requires dose reductions or prolonged treatment intervals. We investigated the proper dose of R-CHOP for them.

Methods: At our institute, for DLBCL patients aged 65–79 and ≥80 years, we had reduced CHOP dose to 5/6 and 7/12, respectively, and retrospectively evaluated the reduced-dose R-CHOP.

Results: Although the median age in the standard, 5/6, and 7/12-dose groups was 57, 73, and 84 years, respectively (p?<?0.001), the 3-year event-free survival (EFS) rate did not differ between the standard and 5/6-dose groups (60.2 and 56.7%); however, 7/12-dose group had significantly inferior survival (25.9%). When patients aged 60–80 were evaluated, no difference in EFS was observed between the standard and 5/6-dose groups using the same international prognostic index. The neutrophil nadir and the frequency of infection were comparable among the three dose groups.

Discussion and Conclusions: Reduced-dose R-CHOP chemotherapy is a promising treatment for elderly patients with DLBCL in terms of efficacy and toxicity.     

Outcomes of human immunodeficiency virus-associated Burkitt lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated in Australia: A report from the Australasian Lymphoma Alliance

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) has improved outcomes for human immunodeficiency virus-associated non-Hodgkin lymphoma (HIV-NHL). This is an analysis of 44 patients with HIV with Burkitt lymphoma (HIV-BL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (HIV-DLBCL) treated in Australia over a 10-year period (2009–2019) during the ART and rituximab era. At HIV-NHL diagnosis, the majority of presenting patients had adequate CD4 counts and undetectable HIV viral load <50 copies/mL. More than 80% of patients received chemotherapy with curative intent, rituximab, and concurrent ART with chemotherapy (immunotherapy). R-CODOX-M/IVAC or R-Hyper-CVAD (55%) were most commonly used in HIV-BL. CHOP (58%) was the most commonly used chemotherapy backbone for HIV-DLBCL, although 45% of patients received more intense chemotherapy regimens. Overall, 93% of patients who received curative therapy completed their intended course. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for the HIV-BL cohort was 67% and 67% respectively. The 2-year PFS and OS for the HIV-DLBCL cohort was 77% and 81% respectively. Treatment related mortality was 5%. In all, 83% of patients achieved a CD4 count of >0.2 ×10⁹/L 6 months after the end of treatment. Current Australian practice favours the treatment of HIV-BL and HIV-DLBCL similarly to the HIV-negative population with the use of concurrent ART, achieving outcomes comparable to the HIV-negative population.     

Serum BAFF predicts prognosis better than APRIL in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with rituximab plus CHOP chemotherapy

Objectives:  B-cell activating factor of the tumor necrosis factor family (BAFF) and a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) regulate survival and proliferation of B cells. Thus the association of elevated serum levels of BAFF and APRIL with worse prognosis has been suggested in B-cell lymphoid malignancies. However, the prognostic relevance of BAFF and APRIL is unknown in patients treated with rituximab, a monoclonal antibody targeting B-cell depletion.
Methods:  We measured serum levels of BAFF and APRIL by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 66 patients newly diagnosed as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). All patients were treated with rituximab-CHOP chemotherapy.
Results:  The mean (±standard deviation) serum level of BAFF (1 970.21 ± 1 979.45 pg/mL) was higher in DLBCL than in controls (861.03 ± 194.92 pg/mL, Mann–Whitney U -test, P  < 0.001). When the patients were dichotomized into high and low BAFF group based on the median value (1 258.00 pg/mL), high BAFF group had less numbers of complete responders to rituximab-CHOP, and more relapses or progression after or during treatment. In multivariate analysis, serum BAFF was an independent prognostic factor for overall survival and progression-free survival ( P  < 0.05). Although serum levels of APRIL was also higher than controls (10.60 ± 19.08 ng/mL vs. 1.10 ± 0.30 ng/mL, P  = 0.023), it failed to show prognostic significance.
Conclusions:  Serum BAFF may be a useful indicator predicting prognosis in DLBCL patients treated with rituximab-containing chemotherapy.     

Late relapse in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: impact of rituximab on their incidence and outcome

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) constitutes 25–35% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas in Western countries. Approximately two thirds of the patients can be cured with standard immuno-chemotherapy. Most relapses occur within 1–2 years from diagnosis, however, the occurrence of relapses after 5 years or more has been described. We aimed at defining the incidence and clinical features of late relapses. Data of 1113 DLBCL patients were analysed. Among the 196 patients relapsing after a first complete remission, 36 (18% of relapses and 3% of all DLBCLs) experienced a recurrence more than 5 years from diagnosis. Late relapsing patients, in comparison with those relapsing earlier, showed a more favourable risk profile at presentation: normal lactate dehydrogenase levels (P = 0·002), early Ann Arbor stage (P = 0·006) and low International Prognostic Index (P = 0·003). The risk of late relapse was lowered by the introduction of rituximab as part of the front-line treatment (P < 0·001). Cause-specific survival (CSS) from the time of relapse was significantly better for late relapsing patients compared to those relapsing early: 5-year CSS rates were 53% and 31%, respectively (P = 0·033). A trend toward a better overall survival was also observed, with 5-year rates after relapse of 47% and 25%, respectively (P = 0·054).     

Dose-adjusted EPOCH plus rituximab is an effective regimen in patients with poor-prognostic untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: results from a prospective observational study

This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of an infusional DA-EPOCH (dose-adjusted etoposide/vincristine/doxorubicin/bolus cyclophosphamide/prednisone) and rituximab (DA-EPOCH-R) regimen for patients with poor prognosis diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Thirty-three patients, aged 21-76 years, with an age-adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI) of 2 or 3, were enrolled, and 31/33 patients were evaluable for response. Consolidative radiation therapy was given to eight patients with bulky (> or =10 cm) disease at presentation. Overall, 26 patients (83.8%) achieved a complete remission (CR), four patients (12.9%) achieved a partial remission, and one patient (3.2%) died during induction. Two patients relapsed (7.6%) within 15 months. Grade 3-4 neutropenia developed in 52% of cycles and neutropenic fever in 14% of cycles (51% of patients). The estimates for event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival at 2 years were 68% and 75% respectively. The only factor related to poor EFS was the presence of three age-adjusted IPI-risk factors. We conclude that DA-EPOCH-R has clinically significant activity with a favourable toxicity profile for poor-prognostic DLBCL patients. The administration of DA-EPOCH-R as an outpatient regimen by using a single portable infusion pump may be a feasible alternative to improve the compliance and to reduce the total cost of this very effective regimen.     

Dose-dense and high-dose chemotherapy plus rituximab with autologous stem cell transplantation for primary treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a poor prognosis: a phase II multicenter study

Background

We investigated the addition of rituximab to dose-dense and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with untreated poor-prognosis diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Design and Methods

Ninety-four young patients (age, 18–60) with stage III–IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma at intermediate/high or high risk according to the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index were enrolled into a phase II trial. The treatment was as follows: four courses of bi-weekly rituximab-cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-vincristine-prednisone (R-MegaCEOP14), two courses of rituximab-mitoxantrone-cytarabine-dexamethasone (R-MAD) and carmustine-etoposide-cytarabine-melphalan (BEAM) with autologous stem cell transplantation.

Results

The complete response and toxic death rates were 82% and 5%, respectively. Failure-free survival and overall survival rates at 4 years were 73% and 80%, respectively. The outcomes of these patients were retrospectively compared to those of 41 patients with similar characteristics enrolled into a previous phase II trial of high-dose chemotherapy without rituximab. This historical group was treated with eight weekly infusions of methotrexate-doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide-vincristine-prednisone-bleomycin (MACOP-B), two courses of MAD and BEAM with autologous stem cell transplantation. The 4-year failure-free survival rates for the rituximab and historical groups were 73% versus 44%, respectively (p=0.001); the 4-year overall survival rates were 80% and 54%, respectively (p=0.002). A Cox’s multivariable model was applied to adjust the effect of treatment for unbalanced or important prognostic factors: failure and death risks were significantly reduced in the rituximab group compared to the historical group, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.44 (p=0.01) for failure-free survival and 0.46 (p=0.02) for overall survival.

Conclusions

These results suggest that the addition of rituximab to high-dose chemotherapy is effective and safe in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a poor-prognosis and such regimens need to be compared to dose-dense chemoimmunotherapy without autologous stem cell transplantation in randomized trials.     

Use of rituximab in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the salvage setting

The addition of rituximab (R) to CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) chemotherapy was a milestone in the development of front-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). R-CHOP and equivalent rituximab-containing anthracycline-based regimens are now widely accepted as the standard of care in this setting. However, the optimal treatment for patients with DLBCL relapsing or progressing after front-line therapy is not yet established. This review explores the role of rituximab in the treatment of DLBCL in the salvage setting, as monotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy or novel agents, and in the context of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Current evidence suggests that rituximab may improve outcomes in several ways: the higher response rates achieved with rituximab-based induction in the salvage setting optimize the number of patients who are able to proceed to high-dose therapy -ASCT; rituximab may improve outcomes following ASCT when used as post-transplantation consolidation/maintenance therapy; and addition of rituximab to salvage regimens may improve outcomes for patients ineligible for transplantation. However, patients refractory to or relapsing after first-line therapy (including rituximab-based regimens) still have a poor prognosis. In conclusion, rituximab in salvage therapy for DLBCL is effective and well tolerated. Ongoing studies will further clarify the optimal use of rituximab in the salvage setting.     

GEMOX-R regimen is a highly effective salvage regimen in patients with refractory/relapsing diffuse large-cell lymphoma: a phase II study

Objectives:  The prognosis of old or immunocompromised patients with refractory or relapsing diffuse large-cell lymphoma (DLCL) is very poor as the current standard of salvage therapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is not feasible for most of them. New active regimens with an acceptable toxicity profile are needed. We aim to report the results of a phase II trial of the GEMOX-R regimen in DLCL.
Methods:  A total of 32 patients received GEMOX-R regimen in 2-wk intervals if feasible or every 3 wk for a planned six to eight courses.
Results:  Median age of the population was 69 yr. Forty-one percent of the patients were primary refractory and 59% after relapsing. At GEMOX-R, 75% of patients had a stage III–IV and an adjusted International Prognostic Index > 1 was observed in 69%. The response rate was 43% with 34% complete response. Neutropenia and thrombopenia grade III–IV were observed in 43% of the patients and neurotoxicity grade III–IV in 7% of cases. Median follow-up for alive patients was 13 months and the median survival was 9.1 months. At 12 months, the overall survival and progression-free survival were 41% and 29%, respectively.
Conclusions:  GEMOX-R is a new salvage regimen for DLCL with high activity and relatively safe toxicity profile, which can be offered to elderly patients not candidates of ASCT consolidation. The high efficacy of the regimen in this unfavorable population and also in immunocompromised situations warrant further investigation of this regimen in all salvage situations of this type of lymphomas.     

Correlations between BCL6 rearrangement and outcome in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP or R-CHOP

Background

BCL6 gene rearrangement is the most frequent chromosomal abnormality in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, a malignancy characterized by genetic heterogeneity and wide variability in clinical outcome. The prognostic significance of BCL6 rearrangement has not been evaluated in the context of rituximab therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. We analyzed the effect of the BCL6 rearrangement on survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP and CHOP plus rituximab (R-CHOP).

Design and Methods

BCL6 rearrangement status was analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization with break-apart probes in 164 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP (n=65) or R-CHOP (n=99). Cell-of-origin immunophenotype including BCL6 protein expression were determined by immunohistochemistry on a tissue microarray.

Results

BCL6 rearrangement was detected in 19.5% of cases. The presence of the gene rearrangement was associated with a non-germinal center B-cell immunophenotype (P=0.006), and showed no correlation with BCL6 protein expression. A trend toward inferior overall survival was observed in association with the BCL6 rearrangement among patients treated with R-CHOP (P=0.08), but not among patients treated with CHOP (P=0.64). However, BCL6 rearrangement also correlated with a high International Prognostic Index score (P=0.02), and did not demonstrate independent prognostic value by multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

The introduction of rituximab may have altered the prognostic impact of BCL6 gene rearrangement in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. However, prospective analysis within large randomized clinical trials will be needed to clarify the prognostic significance of this biomarker in the rituximab era.     

老年弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤50例患者的临床特征和预后分析

目的 探讨老年弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤（DLBCL）患者的临床特征及预后因素。方法 回顾性分析2010年1月至2013年1月,第四军医大学西京医院血液内科收治的50例年龄≥70岁的老年DLBCL患者,收集整理年龄、Ann-Arbor分期、B症状、国际预后指数（IPI）、乳酸脱氢酶（LDH）、β2?微球蛋白、Ki-67等资料进而分析临床特点;采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,并进行单因素分析评估预后。结果 50例初发老年DLBCL患者中,60%患者为Ⅲ～Ⅳ期,54% IPI评分为3～5分,52%有B症状,75%原发部位为结外。在老年患者中,调整剂量的化疗疗效优于放疗及对症支持治疗。利妥昔单抗联合剂量调整化疗（R-CHOP）组完全缓解（CR）率优于不包括利妥昔单抗的剂量调查化疗（CHOP/COP）组。患者中位生存时间为 8个月,1、2、3年总生存率分别为48.5%、30.8%、11.5%。生存分析发现Ki-67对患者生存有显著的影响,尤其是Ki-67＞80%患者预后差。结论 老年患者以疾病分期晚,易合并其他系统疾病,生存期短为特征,具有更高的DLBCL发病率,Ki-67是一个重要的不良预后指标。R-CHOP方案可明显提高CR率,并且足够疗程的化疗将显著改善超高龄患者的生存期。     

2例AIDS相关弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者

[摘要]?分析在甘肃省武威肿瘤医院治疗的2例自体造血干细胞移植（auto-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, ASCT）AIDS相关弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤（AIDS-related diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, AIDS-DLBCL）患者的临床特征、治疗及预后,并复习相关文献,探讨ASCT在治疗AIDS-DLBCL中的作用。     

Overexpression of FoxM1 offers a promising therapeutic target in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Background

FoxM1 has been shown to play a critical role in the pathogenesis of various epithelial malignancies. However, its role in lymphoid malignancies has not been fully clarified. We, therefore, investigated the role of FoxM1 expression in a large cohort of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma samples and panel of cell lines.

Design and Methods

FoxM1 expression was investigated in a large series of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma tissues in a tissue microarray format by immunohistochemistry. Apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry and protein expression was detected by immunoblotting using diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cell lines following treatment with either pharmacological inhibitor of FoxM1 or small interference RNA knockdown strategy. Invasion/migration and soft agar colony assays were also performed following treatment with FoxM1 inhibitor.

Results

FoxM1 expression was detected in 84.6% of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma tumors and found to be significantly associated with proliferative tumor marker Ki67 (P<0.0001), matrix metalloproteinases-2 (P=0.0008), matrix metalloproteinases-9 (P=0.0002), S-phase kinase associated protein-2 (P<0.0001) and inversely associated with p27 expression (P=0.0215). Expression of small interference RNA targeted against FoxM1 or treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells with thiostrepton caused its downregulation accompanied by decreased expression of matrix metalloproteinases-2 and matrix metalloproteinases-9. Inhibition of FoxM1 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells also decreased invasive and migratory capability, and induced caspase dependent apoptosis via activation of the mitochondrial apoptotic pathway. Finally, combined thiostrepton and bortezomib at sub-toxic doses led to efficient apoptosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma cells.

Conclusions

Altogether, these results suggest that FoxM1 is over-expressed in the majority of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma samples. These data also indicate that targeting FoxM1 signaling can serve as a potential therapeutic modality in the management of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.     

Impact of rituximab on treatment outcomes of patients with diffuse large b-cell lymphoma: a population-based analysis

We conducted a multi-institutional population-based analysis of the survival and toxicity associated with the addition of rituximab to chemotherapy for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including patients aged ≥ 80 years, who were excluded from published randomized trials. Using population-based registries in Ontario, we identified 4021 patients who received chemotherapy with or without rituximab (R-CHOP [rituximab with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone] or CHOP) for DLBCL between 1996 and 2007, including 397 patients aged ≥ 80 years. After propensity score matching, the overall survival (OS) and significant toxicities for R-CHOP and CHOP treatment groups were compared. R-CHOP was associated with a significant increase in 5-year OS compared to CHOP alone (62% vs. 54%; hazard of death = 0·78, P = 0·0004). Survival benefit was seen in all age groups, including those aged ≥ 80 years. Patients treated with rituximab did not have a significant increase in 1-year hospitalization rates for cardiac, pulmonary, gastrointestinal or neurological diagnoses compared to those treated with CHOP alone. The addition of rituximab to CHOP improves survival in the general population of patients with DLBCL and produces early survival benefit for very elderly patients, without any significant increase in the risk of serious toxicity.     

Lack of prognostic significance of the germinal-center phenotype in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with CHOP-like chemotherapy with and without rituximab

The influence of the germinal-center B-cell (GCB) and the non-GCB phenotypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) on the outcome of 92 patients treated with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) or CHOP-like chemotherapy, with or without rituximab was determined in this study. The differentiation between the GCB and non-GCB types was arrived at by immunohistochemistry using previously published criteria. Thirty-nine patients had the GCB and 53 had the non-GCB type of DLBCL. Forty-nine patients were treated with rituximab and chemotherapy; 43 were treated with chemotherapy alone. The GCB and non-GCB group did not differ in their international prognostic index factors and score, presence of bulky disease, or frequency of rituximab treatment. Median follow-up of the surviving patients was carried out for 37 months. There was no difference between the GCB and non-GCB groups in both overall response rates (67 vs. 70%, respectively) and estimated rates of 3-year event-free (46 vs. 49%, respectively) and overall (54 vs. 56%, respectively) survival. In addition, no differences of the outcomes were observed between the subgroups treated with or without rituximab. The patients of this study with immunohistochemically determined GCB-type DLBCL did not have an improved prognosis, irrespective of whether they had received rituximab or not.