Randomised study of tegafur and oral leucovorin versus intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

This randomised, open-label trial compared oral tegafur (FT)/leucovorin (LV) with the intravenous bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/LV as first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients were randomised to receive oral FT 750 mg/m2/day for 21 days and LV 15 mg/m2 every 8 h in cycles repeated every 28 days (n=114), or intravenous LV 20 mg/m2 followed by 5-FU 425 mg/m2 daily for 5 days every 4 weeks for 2 cycles, and later every 5 weeks (n=123). Response rate was significantly higher in the FT/LV arm (27%, 95% CI 19-35) than in the 5-FU/LV arm (13%, 95% CI 7-19) (p<0.004). The median time to progression was 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.3-6.5; FT/LV arm) and 6.2 months (95% CI, 5.4-6.9; 5-FU/LV arm). Median overall survival was 12.4 months (95% CI, 10.3-14.5 months; FT/LV arm) and 12.2 months (95% CI, 8.9-15.7 months; 5-FU/LV arm) (p=n.s.; hazard ratio FT/LV:5-FU/LV=1.02). 5-FU/LV showed a higher incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia (4.1 vs. 0%). Non-hematological toxicities showed similar incidences in the two treatment arms. Oral FT/LV was more active than IV 5-FU/LV in terms of objective response rate with similar overall survival, and with a favorable toxicity profile. This makes FT/LV a valid alternative to the IV 5-FU schedule in CRC patients.     

Randomized phase II study of irinotecan, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (ILF) versus cisplatin plus ILF (PILF) combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan, in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or cisplatin, has demonstrated efficacy against advanced gastric cancer (AGC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive AGC patients were randomly assigned to receive irinotecan 150 mg/m(2) on day 1, leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 (ILF) or ILF plus cisplatin 30 mg/m(2) on day 2 (PILF). Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Of 91 registered patients, 45 patients were treated with ILF and 45 with PILF. For both arms, 687 chemotherapy cycles were delivered (median = 7 for ILF and 8 for PILF). Both ILF and PILF were generally well tolerated and there was no relevant difference in the occurrence of overall grade 3/4 toxic effects between the two arms. Four patients died during treatment: one in the ILF and three in the PILF arm. The objective response rate was 42% for both arms. There was no significant difference in therapeutic efficacy between ILF and PILF with respect to progression-free survival (4.8 versus 6.2 months; P = 0.523) and overall survival (10.7 versus 10.5 months; P = 0.850). CONCLUSION: Both ILF and PILF are active as first-line chemotherapy for AGC. The addition of cisplatin, however, has no clear advantage over ILF.     

FOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan) vs FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan) as first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC): a multicentre randomised phase III trial from the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

To compare the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in combination with irinotecan (CPT-11), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFOXIRI) vs irinotecan and 5-FU/LV (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). A total of 283 chemotherapy-na?ve patients with MCC were enrolled (FOLFIRI arm: n=146; FOLFOXIRI arm: n=137). In the FOLFOXIRI arm, CPT-11 (150 mg m(-2)) was given on d1, L-OHP (65 mg m(-2)) on d2, LV (200 mg m(-2)) on days 2 and 3 and 5-FU (400 mg m(-2) as i.v. bolus and 600 mg m(-2) as 22 h i.v. continuous infusion) on days 2 and 3. In the FOLFIRI arm, CPT-11 (180 mg m(-2)) was given on d1 whereas LV and 5-FU were administered in the same way as in the FOLFOXIRI regimen. Both regimens were administered every 2 weeks. There was no difference in terms of overall survival (median OS: 19.5 and 21.5 months, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively; P=0.337), median time to disease progression (FOLFIRI: 6.9 and FOLFOXIRI: 8.4 months; P=0.17), response rates (33.6 and 43% for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively; P=0.168). Patients treated with FOLFOXIRI had a significantly higher incidence of alopecia (P=0.0001), diarrhoea (P=0.0001) and neurosensory toxicity (P=0.001) compared with patients treated with FOLFIRI. The present study failed to demonstrate any superiority of the FOLFOXIRI combination compared with the FOLFIRI regimen, although the observed median OS is one of the best ever reported in the literature.     

A prospective randomized study of irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) versus leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to compare the activity and toxicity of an irinotecan (CPT-11), leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) combination with a standard regimen of 5FU and LV, in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. One hundred and sixty patients were randomized; 80 patients (group A) received LV 20 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. on days 1-5, every 28 days; 80 patients (group B) received CPT-11 80 mg/m(2) (30-90 min i.v. infusion), followed by LV 20 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. and 5FU 425 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36, every 8 weeks. The overall response rate was 30% and 47.5% in groups A and B respectively. Progression-free survival was significantly higher in the triple-drug combination arm (median 7.5 vs. 4.5 months; p= 0. 0335). However, overall survival did not differ significantly between the two arms (15 months vs. 14 months for the groups B and A respectively; p=0.3531). The main grade 3 adverse events were diarrhea (19%, in group A vs. 35% in group B; p=0.032) and mucositis (2% vs. 14%; p=0.017). The regimen containing irinotecan showed activity in advanced colorectal cancer. The overall safety data confirm this combination as a well-tolerated treatment.     

Oral capecitabine vs intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: integrated efficacy data and novel analyses from two large, randomised, phase III trials

This study evaluates the efficacy of capecitabine using data from a large, well-characterised population of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated in two identically designed phase III studies. A total of 1207 patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomised to either oral capecitabine (1250 mg m(-2) twice daily, days 1-14 every 21 days; n=603) or intravenous (i.v.) bolus 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV; Mayo Clinic regimen; n=604). Capecitabine demonstrated a statistically significant superior response rate compared with 5-FU/LV (26 vs 17%; P<0.0002). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that capecitabine consistently resulted in superior response rates (P<0.05), even in patient subgroups with poor prognostic indicators. The median time to response and duration of response were similar and time to progression (TTP) was equivalent in the two arms (hazard ratio (HR) 0.997, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.885-1.123, P=0.95; median 4.6 vs 4.7 months with capecitabine and 5-FU/LV, respectively). Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified younger age, liver metastases, multiple metastases and poor Karnofsky Performance Status as independent prognostic indicators for poor TTP. Overall survival was equivalent in the two arms (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.84-1.06, P=0.48; median 12.9 vs 12.8 months, respectively). Capecitabine results in superior response rate, equivalent TTP and overall survival, an improved safety profile and improved convenience compared with i.v. 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment for MCRC. For patients in whom fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is indicated, capecitabine should be strongly considered. Following encouraging results from phase I and II trials, randomised trials are evaluating capecitabine in combination with irinotecan, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. Capecitabine is a suitable replacement for i.v. 5-FU as the backbone of colorectal cancer therapy.     

Trimetrexate as biochemical modulator of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer: final results of a randomised European study.

BACKGROUND: Trimetrexate (TMTX) is a biochemical modulator of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). Phase II trials have shown promising activity of 5-FU/LV/TMTX in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). This trial evaluated the effect of TMTX in combination with 5-FU/LV as first-line treatment in ACC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ACC were randomised to receive either intravenous LV 200 mg/m2/5-FU 600 mg/m2 or TMTX 110 mg/m2 followed 24 h later by LV 200 mg/m2/5-FU 500 mg/m2 plus oral LV rescue. Both schedules were given weekly for 6 weeks every 8 weeks. Patients were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), tumour response, quality of life (QoL) and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 365 patients were randomised. A statistically significant prolongation of median PFS was seen in patients treated with TMTX/5-FU/LV compared with 5-FU/LV (5.4 months versus 4.1 months, respectively; P = 0.03), and a trend towards a significant benefit for OS (13.4 months versus 10.5 months, respectively; P = 0.08). Tumour response, QoL and toxicity were comparable between the two arms. Diarrhoea was the most frequently occurring grade 3 or 4 toxicity (22% and 30%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of TMTX to a weekly regimen of 5-FU/LV results in a small but significant improvement in PFS without adding toxicity or worsening QoL in patients with ACC.     

Randomised Phase III study of biweekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5FU with folinic acid and oxaliplatin versus monthly plus 5-FU/folinic acid in first-line treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: A phase III study was started to compare oxaliplatin/5FU/LV in the first-line with bolus FU/LV in metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 302 patients were randomised and received bolus 5-FU 425 mg/m(2) day 1-5, FA 20 mg/m(2) day 1-5, q 4 wk or oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2), 2 h-infusion, FA 200 mg/m(2), 1-h infusion. 5-FU 2600 mg/m(2), 24-h infusion day 1, q 2 wk. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR). RESULTS: The median follow-up is 31.8 months, 90.4% of the patients have died. Confirmed RR, progression free survival (PFS; months) and median overall survival (OS; months) in 5FU/LV versus 5FU/LV/oxaliplatin were respectively 18.5% versus (vs) 33.8% (P = 0.004), 5.6 vs 6.7 (P = 0.016) and 13.3 vs 13.8 (P = 0.619). In the 5FU/LV/oxaliplatin arm less grade (3/4) toxicity was measured for diarrhoea, stomatitis, an increase in idiosyncratic side effects and neurosensory events compared with 5FU/LV. The quality of life (QOL) was equal in both arms. Second line treatment was given in 62% of the patients, crossover of 5FU/LV to 5FU/LV/oxaliplatin occurred in 14%. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin in the first-line resulted in an increased RR and PFS with less grade 3/4 mucositis/diarrhoea compared with 5FU/LV alone. Idiosyncratic side effects deserve attention with oxaliplatin. Despite a low treatment cross over rate, OS in both groups was comparable.     

Etoposide,leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in 5-FU+LV pre-treated patients with advanced colorectal cancer

In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of the weekly combination of etoposide, leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) when administered as second-line chemotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory advanced colorectal cancer (ACC), previously treated with weekly LV+5-FU. Etoposide was administered at 3 different dose levels (DLs), in 3 groups of 20 patients each (total: 60); DL-I: etoposide 80 mg/m2, DL-II: etoposide 120 mg/m2, and DL-III: etoposide 180 mg/m2, in 45 min i.v. infusion, and followed in all levels by LV 100 mg/m2 i.v. over 1 hour and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 i.v. bolus. Treatment was administered weekly until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. No patients at DL-I responded, while 2 patients at DL-II and 3 at DL-III had a partial response (PR). Stable disease (SD) rates were as follows; at DL-I: 2, DL-II: 8 and DL-III: 9. More patients in DL-I progressed (n = 19) compared to DL-II (n=10) and DL-II (n = 8) (p < 0.0007). Time to progression was for DL-I, -II, -III: 17, 15, and 14 weeks, respectively. Median survival was DL-I, -II, -III: 30, 30, and 32.5 weeks, respectively. Toxicity consisted mainly of neutropenia, diarrhea and mucositis at all DLs, and was significantly more severe in DL-III. No difference was noted in responses between DL-II and DL-III. The authors conclude that the combination of etoposide with LV+5-FU has limited activity when administered after failure of weekly LV+5-FU in patients with ACC and should not be recommended for further evaluation.     

Phase II study of the modified regimen of etoposide, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil for patients with advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of the treatment of advanced gastric cancer is not very good. The response rate to the original etoposide--leucovorin--5-fluorouracil (ELF) treatment is 53% with tolerable side effects. Whether increasing the dose intensity by prolonging the duration of infusion with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) from 3 to 5 days for advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients would enhance the efficacy but not increase side effects is still unknown. METHODS: Thirty-six advanced or metastatic gastric cancer and chemotherapy-naive patients with measurable or evaluable diseases were scheduled to receive intravenous etoposide 100 mg/m2/day on days 2-4, LV 300 mg/m2/day intravenously and 5-FU 500 mg/m2/day intravenously on days 1-5, every 4 weeks. All patients who received at least two courses of chemotherapy were evaluated for tumor response, survival and response duration and toxicity according to the WHO criteria. RESULTS: Thirteen patients showed a response, including five with complete response (CR). The overall response rate was 36% (95% confidence interval, CI, 20-52%) in the whole group and 46% (95% CI 28-66%) in the 28 patients with measurable disease. The median progression-free interval and overall median survival time were 5 and 7 months, respectively. The most frequent toxicity was alopecia (grade I/II 56.3%). The incidence of grade III or greater myelosuppression was 5.9%. No treatment-related death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of the modified ELF by increasing the dosages of 5-FU and LV is not superior to the results of the original regimen, yet it is a relatively safe and tolerable combination regimen for advanced gastric cancer.      

Oxaliplatin combined with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (OCFL) in metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase I-II study.

BACKGROUND: A phase I-II multicenter trial was conducted to define the maximal tolerated dose and describe the activity of an OCFL combination using oxaliplatin (OHP), irinotecan (CPT-11) and 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: CRC patients not pretreated with palliative chemotherapy, with performance status < or =1 and adequate haematological, kidney and liver function, were eligible. Treatment consisted in weekly 24-h infusion 5-FU (2300 mg/m(2))/LV (30 mg) and alternating OHP (70-85 mg/m(2), days 1 and 15) and CPT-11 (80-140 mg/m(2), days 8 and 22) repeated every 5 weeks. OHP and CPT-11 were escalated in cohorts of three to six patients. RESULTS: Thirty patients received a median of five cycles. Dose-limiting toxicity occurred at dose level 3, and the recommended dose was OHP 70 mg/m(2), CPT-11 100 mg/m(2), LV 30 mg and 5-FU 2300 mg/m(2)/24 h. Grade > or =3 toxicities were diarrhea 23%, neutropenia 20%, fatigue 7%, and neurologic 7%. Two febrile neutropenia episodes (one fatal) were recorded. Among 28 patients with measurable disease (90%), we observed two complete and 20 partial responses; overall RR was 78% (95% CI, 59% to 92%). Median time to progression and overall survival were 9.5 and 25.4 months, respectively. Seven patients underwent liver metastases resection. CONCLUSION: OCFL is an overall well tolerated regimen with very high efficacy, which makes it most suitable for tumour control before surgery of metastatic disease.     

Antitumour activity of three second-line treatment combinations in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after optimal 5-FU regimen failure: a randomised, multicentre phase II study.

BACKGROUND: We have investigated the efficacy, safety and quality of life profiles of three therapeutic combinations [irinotecan + leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin + LV/5-FU and irinotecan +oxaliplatin] in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of a 5-FU-based regimen, or whose disease had progressed within 6 months of the end of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and one patients were randomised to receive either: (i) irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by an LV 200 mg/m(2) infusion, before a 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus followed by a 5-FU 600 mg/m(2) infusion (LV5FU2 regimen), on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; (ii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) on day 1 followed by the LV5FU2 regimen on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks; or (iii) oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) followed by irinotecan 200 mg/m(2), both on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR). RESULTS: The intention-to-treat ORRs were 11.4% [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.2-26.7), 21.2% (95% CI 9.0-38.9) and 15.2% (95% CI 5.1-31.9), respectively, in the three arms. Tumour growth control was >or=60% for all three combinations and overall survivals were 12.2 months (95% CI 9.2-16.0), 11.5 months (95% CI 9.0-14.1) and 11.0 months (95% CI 8.1-12.2), respectively. All patients were evaluable for safety. Main grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (33 to 39% of patients). CONCLUSIONS: Thus, second-line treatment with irinotecan/LV5FU2, oxaliplatin/LV5FU2 or irinotecan/oxaliplatin, provides good tumour growth control and survival coupled with an acceptable safety profile.     

Integrated analysis of overall survival in two randomised studies comparing 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with or without trimetrexate in advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Two randomised studies were performed with trimetrexate (TMTX) as a biochemical modulator of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC), one in Europe and one in the United States. Both studies were similarly designed to detect a statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS), however, was later adopted as the primary outcome measure for approvability of agents for first-line treatment of ACC. Therefore, an integrated analysis of survival data from the European and USA trials was performed to detect a clinically relevant difference in survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The experimental arm was identical in both studies and consisted of TMTX 110 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) followed 24 h later by i.v. LV 200 mg/m2/5-FU 500 mg/m2 plus oral LV rescue. The 5-FU dose in the control arm was 600 mg/m2 in the European study and 500 mg/m2 in the USA study, and the USA study was placebo-controlled. Treatment was given weekly for 6 weeks every 8 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 746 patients were analysed. Median OS was 13.0 months for 5-FU/LV and 14.6 months for TMTX/5-FU/LV (P = 0.15; Wilcoxon). Median PFS was 4.4 months and 5.4 months, respectively (P = 0.07; Wilcoxon). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of TMTX to a weekly regimen of 5-FU/LV does not improve the outcome for patients with ACC.     

A prospective randomised phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with stage II colon cancer

The purpose of this trial was to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in stage II colon cancer. Patients with stage II colon cancer were randomised to either adjuvant chemotherapy with 5-FU/LV (100 mg m(-2) LV+450 mg m(-2) 5-FU weekly, weeks 1-6, in 8 weeks cycles x 7) or surveillance only. Five hundred patients were evaluable for analyses. After a median follow-up of 95.6 months, 55 of 252 patients (21.8%) have died in the 5-FU/LV arm and 58 of 248 patients (23.4%) in the surveillance arm. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the two treatment arms (hazard ratios, HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.61-1.27, P=0.49). The relative risk for tumour relapse was higher for patients on the surveillance arm than for those on the 5-FU/LV arm; however, this difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.45-1.06, P=0.09). Consequently, disease-free survival (DFS) was not significantly different between the two trial arms. In conclusion, results of this trial demonstrate a trend to a lower risk for relapse in patients treated with adjuvant 5-FU/LV for stage II colon cancer. However, in this study with limited power to detect small differences between the study arms, adjuvant chemotherapy failed to significantly improve DFS and OS.     

Combination of irinotecan (CPT-11) plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI regimen) as first line treatment for elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase II trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of irinotecan (CPT-11) in combination with bolus and continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) (FOLFIRI regimen) as first-line treatment of elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCC). METHODS: Thirty consecutive, previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, aged (median 76 years; range 70-84) were enrolled. The performance status (WHO) was 0 in 8, 1 in 16 and 2 in 6 patients; 19 (63%) patients had prior surgery and 8 (27%) adjuvant chemotherapy. CPT-11 (180 mg/m(2) as a 90 min i.v. infusion) was administered on day 1, LV (200 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour i.v. infusion), 5-FU (400 mg/m(2)/d i.v. bolus followed by 600 mg/m(2)/d as a 22-hour i.v. continuous infusion) were given on days 1 and 2 every 2 weeks. RESULTS: Complete response was achieved in one (3.3%) patient and partial response in 10 (33.3%) (overall response rate: 36.6%; 95% C.I.: 26.6-48.4%); 11 (36.6%) patients had stable disease and, 8 (26.6%) disease progression. The median duration of response was 7.5 months and the median time to disease progression 7.0 months. After a median follow-up period of 17 months, the median overall survival was 14.5 months. Main toxicities were: grade 3-4 neutropenia (n = 6; 20%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (n = 1; 3.3%), grade 2 anemia (n = 9; 30%), grade 3-4 diarrhea (n = 5; 17%) and grade 3 asthenia (n = 3; 10%). There was one treatment-related death due to neutropenic sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: The FOLFIRI combination is an active regimen with manageable toxicity as front-line treatment in patients above 70 years of age.     

A phase II study of irinotecan alternated with a weekly schedule of oxaliplatin, high-dose leucovorin and 48-hour infusion 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) alternated with a weekly treatment for 4 weeks of oxaliplatin (L-OHP), high-dose leucovorin (LV) and a 48-hour 5-fluorouracil infusion (5-FU 48 h) as first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer (ACC). Patients and METHODS: Previously untreated patients with ACC received chemotherapy consisting of a weekly treatment for 4 weeks of L-OHP (65 mg/m2), high-dose LV (150 mg/m2) followed by a 5-FU 48 h infusion (2,300 or 1,800 mg/m2) alternated with CPT-11 (350 mg/m2). A cycle was to be performed every 8 weeks. Treatment was continued up to tolerance, disease progression or patient refusal. Forty consecutive patients with measurable ACC, aged 26-70, performance status < or =2, entered our study. RESULTS: Six complete and 17 partial responses were observed (overall response rate, 57.5%; 95% confidence interval, CI: 38.8-71.1%); an additional 35% of the patients had stable disease. The median duration of response was 10.9 months (range, 6.5-30+ months). The median time to progression and the median overall survival time were 11.4 (95% CI: 10.4-12.3) and 20.3 (95% CI: 16.4-23.7) months, respectively. At the median follow-up period of 24 months, 17 patients (42.5%) are still alive. After a median number of 4 cycles, one toxic death occurred. The incidence of grade 3-4 toxicity per patient in any cycle was: stomatitis 7.5%, nausea/vomiting 2.5% and diarrhea 45% for the infusional part, neutropenia 37.5%, anemia 2.5%, thrombocytopenia 5%, alopecia 5% and diarrhea 10% for the CPT-11 part of the regimen. Gastrointestinal toxicity was different according to the dose of 5-FU. Serious adverse events occurred most frequently when 5-FU was given at a dose of 2,300 mg/m2 with a high incidence of grade 3-4 diarrhea (72.2%) and stomatitis (16.6%), and led to dose reduction of 5-FU in 13 of 18 patients (72.2%). For 22 patients who started 5-FU at a dose of 1,800 mg/m2, a dose reduction of 5-FU was necessary only 5 times (22.7%). No patient discontinued treatment because of severe neurotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: The activity of our alternating regimen of L-OHP/LV/5-FU 48 h and CPT-11 for not previously treated ACC patients is counterbalanced by a high toxicity and a inconvenient schedule.     

Irinotecan or oxaliplatin combined with leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Irinotecan (IRI) and oxaliplatin (OXA) are effective in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC) were randomly assigned to receive IRI plus leucovorin (LV)/5-fluorouracil (5-FU), or OXA plus LV/5-FU in order to compare the response rates, time-to-tumor progression, overall survival rates, and toxicity profiles of these two agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 1999 to February 2002, 295 patients were randomized to receive either IRI/LV/5-FU or OXA/LV/5-FU. The treatment schedules consisted of weekly IRI 70 mg/m(2) or OXA 45 mg/m(2) plus LV 200 mg/m(2) followed immediately by intravenous bolus 5-FU 450 mg/m(2) for 6 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest period. Treatment was continued for up to four cycles or until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the study arms in the overall response rate (33% with IRI/LV/5-FU versus 32% with OXA/LV/5-FU based on responses demonstrated on a single evaluation; 23% with IRI/LV/5-FU versus 22.3% with OXA/LV/5-FU based on responses confirmed according to WHO criteria) median time to progression (8.9 versus 7.6 months), and median overall survival (17.6 versus 17.4 months). Toxicity profiles (grades 3 and 4) were similar in the IRI and OXA arms (diarrhea 12.3% and 9.8%, neutropenia 8.2% and 4.9%, and febrile neutropenia 1.4% and 1.4%, respectively), with the exception of grade 3 sensory neuropathy, which almost exclusively occurred in the OXA arm (0% versus 5.6%; P=0.003, Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSION: The IRI/LV/5-FU and OXA/LV/5-FU regimens demonstrated equally substantial efficacies and manageable toxicity profiles in the first-line treatment of patients with advanced CRC. However, IRI/LV/5-FU may be the preferable regimen to avoid significant neurotoxicity associated with OXA-LV/5-FU.     

A multicenter phase II study of irinotecan (CPT-11) alternated with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Purpose In this multicenter phase II study the efficacy and safety of the alternating schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11) with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) were assessed as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).Patients and methods Enrolled in the study were 43 patients with advanced CRC. They received CPT-11 350 mg/m² i.v. on day 1, alternating with LV 20 mg/m² i.v. and 5-FU 425 mg/m² i.v. daily for five consecutive days, on days 22–26 (Mayo Clinic regimen). One cycle consisted of 6 weeks.Results A total of 179 cycles were administered with a median of four per patient (range one to nine). Efficacy was analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. The overall objective response rate was 30% (95% CI 16–44), with four complete responses and nine partial responses, whereas 20 patients (4%) showed stable disease. The median time to disease progression was 9.0 months and median survival was 18.5 months. Grade 3/4 diarrhea was mainly related to CPT-11 rather than to 5-FU (9.3% vs 4.7% of patients), whereas grade 3/4 neutropenia was higher during 5-FU administration (16.3% vs 7.0% of patients).Conclusions The alternating schedule of CPT-11 with 5 days bolus of 5-FU and low-dose LV showed a clinical benefit in terms of tumor growth control as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic CRC. The overall safety data confirmed this alternating combination as a well-tolerated treatment.     

Preoperative high-dose leucovorin/5-fluorouracil and radiation therapy for unresectable rectal cancer

Twenty patients with primary or recurrent unresectable rectal cancer limited to the pelvis were entered on a Phase I trial of preoperative pelvic radiation therapy (RT) (5040 cGy) and two cycles of combined high-dose leucovorin (LV) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), followed by surgery and ten cycles of postoperative LV/5-FU (sequential). Maximum tolerated doses (MTD) were determined for preoperative combined LV/5-FU and RT and for postoperative sequential LV/5-FU. 5-FU was escalated 50 mg/m2 while the LV remained constant at 200 mg/m2. The initial doses of 5-FU were combined LV/5-FU and RT (200 mg/m2) and sequential LV/5-FU (325 mg/m2). The median follow-up time was 14 months. The resectability rate was 89%, and the pathologic complete response rate was 21%. The MTD for combined LV/5-FU and RT was 300 mg/m2; therefore, the recommended dose of 5-FU is 250 mg/m2. The recommended dose of 5-FU for sequential LV/5-FU is 375 mg/m2. The dose-limiting toxicities in this trial were diarrhea, tenesmus, increased bowel movements, dysuria, and myelosuppression. For the six patients who received 5-FU at the recommended dose level, the median low counts were leukocyte count, 3.7/microliters (range, 2.4 to 4.9/microliters); hemoglobin, 9.0 g/dl (range, 8.2 to 11.9 g/dl); and platelet count (X1000), 146/microliters (range, 89 to 182/microliters). The incidence rate of any Grade 3 toxicity was 17% (diarrhea and frequent bowel movements). The recommended doses of 5-FU used in this protocol were well tolerated. Because there was a long delay before optimal doses of 5-FU could be delivered, the authors do not recommend that high-dose LV be used in conjunction with combined 5-FU and RT with the treatment regimen as currently designed. However, because the resectability and complete response rates were higher than those previously reported for preoperative RT alone, the authors are encouraged by the combined technique approach. New trials are currently being undertaken to determine if the use of a low-dose LV regimen is more tolerable.     

Chemotherapy with etoposide,doxorubicin, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil,and leucovorin for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: To investigate the therapeutic index of combining etoposide, doxorubicin (adriamycin), cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (EAPFL) chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced HCC, a trial of a novel schedule of triweekly administration was conducted. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-six patients with measurable advanced HCC, adequate liver and renal functions and adequate bone marrow reserves in whom local treatment was not indicated were studied. Triweekly EAPFL treatment consisted of a concomitant boost of etoposide 40 mg/m2 i.v. over 30 min on day 1, 2, and 3, doxorubicin 30 mg/m2 i.v. over 30 min on day 1 to a backbone regimen, triweekly PFL chemotherapy with cisplatin 60 mg/m2, 5-FU 1,200 mg/m2, and leucovorin 120 mg/m2 given simultaneously by a 72-h i.v. infusion. Response, survival, and toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS: One patient had complete response (1%) and thirteen patients had partial response (20%). The objective response rate was 21% (95% confidence interval 11-31%). The median overall survival and median time to progression were 8.9 months and 3.3 months, respectively. Major treatment toxicities (grade 3-4) were neutropenia (28%), anemia (11%), thrombocytopenia (7%), hepatotoxicity (5%), vomiting (2%), and diarrhea (2%). There was no treatment-related death. CONCLUSION: Triweekly EAPFL chemotherapy is a moderately effective regimen with tolerable toxicities in the treatment of advanced HCC.     

Phase II study of oral eniluracil, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The oral administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is hindered by erratic bioavailability due to catabolism of 5-FU by the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in the gastrointestinal tract. Eniluracil is a potent inactivator of DPD which results in 100% oral bioavailability of 5-FU. Leucovorin (LV) is another biochemical modulator of 5-FU that potentiates inhibition of thymidylate synthase, the primary target of 5-FU. The goal of this study was to determine the antitumor activity and toxicity of an oral regimen containing eniluracil, 5-FU, and LV in patients with colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Sixty eligible patients who had previously untreated, measurable, metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated with oral eniluracil 50 mg on Days 1-7, 5-FU 20 mg/m(2) on Days 2-6, and LV 50 mg on Days 2-6. Cycles were repeated at 28-day intervals. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 13% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6, 25%), with 1 complete response and 7 partial responses. Three additional patients had partial responses that were not confirmed at subsequent evaluations. The median time to progression of disease was 4.4 months (95% CI = 3.45, 7.69) and the median survival time was 12.6 months (95% CI = 9.1, 14.75). Grade 3-5 toxicity (1 toxic death) occurred in 51 patients (85%). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 25 patients (42%), and 18 patients (30%) had Grade 3-4 diarrhea. Twenty-one patients (35%) were hospitalized for toxicity, and 12 (20%) had febrile neutropenia. Baseline creatinine clearance was associated inversely with severe toxicity (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although antitumor activity was observed, the frequent occurrence of severe toxicity with this regimen limited its clinical utility. Alternate schedules with a more favorable therapeutic index are undergoing clinical testing and should be pursued. The high level of toxicity observed with orally administered low dose 5-FU underscored the potency of eniluracil as a biochemical modulator.