Comparison of interpretations of CT angiograms in the evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism by on-call radiology fellows and subsequently by radiology faculty

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to evaluate interobserver variability in interpretations performed by on-call radiology fellows and subsequently by attending radiologists of CT angiograms obtained for clinically suspected pulmonary embolism and to evaluate factors contributing to discrepancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Written interpretations made by on-call fellows were compared with reports approved by attending radiologists for all CT angiograms obtained for suspected pulmonary embolism after work hours and on weekends in a recent 19-month period. Interpretations were stratified as positive, negative, or equivocal for pulmonary embolism. In cases of discordant interpretations, those CT angiograms were rereviewed by two thoracic radiologists; then patient medical records were reviewed for evidence of clinical effect. Technical and patient-related reasons for discordant interpretations of CT angiograms were recorded. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-eight oncology patients were examined on CT angiography; five were examined twice. The fellows reported 137 CT angiograms (21%) as positive, 498 (75%) as negative, and 28 (4%) as equivocal for pulmonary embolism. Interpretations of the fellows and attending radiologists agreed in 93% (615/663) of CT angiograms (kappa = 0.80). The concordance rates for CT angiograms interpreted by fellows as positive (89%, 122/137), negative (96%, 479/498), and equivocal (50%, 14/28) were significantly different from each other (p < 0.001 for each). A significantly greater proportion of CT angiograms with discordant interpretations was reported to be technically limited (p < 0.01). No clear adverse clinical events were attributed to discordant interpretations of CT angiograms, although the death of one patient in that subgroup was of indeterminate cause. CONCLUSION: In the evaluation of CT angiograms obtained for suspected pulmonary embolism, on-call fellows showed good agreement with attending radiologists. CT angiograms with discordant interpretations often were limited by technical or patient-related factors.     

CT pulmonary angiography for the detection of pulmonary embolism: interobserver agreement between on-call radiology residents and specialists (CTPA interobserver agreement)

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to prospectively determine interobserver agreement between on-call radiology residents and specialists in the interpretation of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). METHODS: CTPA examinations obtained between January 2002 and March 2003 were interpreted by a radiology resident on call and by two radiology specialists. Agreement was assessed using percentage of agreement between interpreters and by the kappa coefficient. Sensitivity of residents' interpretations was calculated by relating them to the interpretation of Specialist 1, which served as the gold standard. RESULTS: Of the 81 CTPA examinations evaluated, there was agreement of 93% and 91% for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE) and of 97% and 85% for the exclusion of PE with Specialist 1 and 2, respectively. The concordance between residents' interpretations and those of Specialist 1 was very high (kappa=.8), and with those of Specialist 2 was high (kappa=.7). In all cases of agreement between the two specialists, there was complete agreement between the specialists' and the residents' intepretations. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed good to very good agreement of residents' interpretations with each of the radiology specialists. Therefore, relying on the residents' preliminary interpretations during after-hour calls is reasonable.     

Comparison of on-call radiology resident and faculty interpretation of 4- and 16-row multidetector CT pulmonary angiography with indirect CT venography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: On-call radiology residents frequently interpret computed tomography (CT) pulmonary angiography and CT venography studies outside of routine working hours. The purpose of this study was to compare resident and faculty interpretation concordance rates and to see if concordance rates differed depending on the number of CT detectors used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population included 122 consecutive CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and CT venography (CTV) examinations performed on a four-row multidetector CT (MDCT) and 125 consecutive CTPA examinations performed using a 16-row MDCT scanner with CTV performed in 124 patients. Preliminary resident reports and final faculty reports were compared. Discrepant cases were independently reviewed by three cardiothoracic radiologists who were unaware of the initial interpretations. Interpretation concordance rates were calculated for both 4- and 16- row MDCT studies and compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Resident and faculty CTPA and CTV interpretations were concordant in 80% of the 4-row cases and 94% of the 16-row cases. When comparing resident interpretation to the final expert reference standard, the corrected resident error rate was 11% and 2% for 4-row CTPA and CTV, respectively and 4% and 2% for 16-row CTPA and CTV, respectively. Overall CTPA and CTV concordance was significantly lower for 4-row MDCT (80% versus 94%, P < .001 [two-sided] by Fisher's exact test). CONCLUSIONS: Radiology resident interpretation of CTPA and CTV studies demonstrates a high level of agreement with radiology faculty interpretation. Concordance rates are significantly higher for 16-row MDCT than 4-row MDCT which may be due to improved image quality.     

Resident Interpretation of Emergency CT Scans in the Evaluation of Acute Appendicitis

PURPOSE: Radiology resident interpretation of computed tomographic (CT) scans at academic institutions often guides management of cases of suspected acute appendicitis in the emergency department. The purpose of this study was to compare resident and faculty interpretation of CT scans obtained for acute appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From December 16, 1999, to July 13, 2000, CT was performed in 103 consecutive patients between the hours of 9:00 PM and 8:00 AM who were suspected of having acute appendicitis. The authors compared the residents' preliminary written interpretations with both the final reports written by the faculty and the surgical findings. The faculty interpreting the CT scans were aware of resident interpretations but were not aware that a study was being conducted. RESULTS: The final faculty interpretation and the preliminary resident interpretation were identical in 96 of the 103 patients (93%; 95% confidence interval: 87.8%, 97.2%). In only one patient was a scan originally interpreted as negative interpreted as positive by the faculty member. Clinically, the patient did not have acute appendicitis, and surgery was not perforrmed. CONCLUSION: In the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, image interpretations made by adequately trained radiology residents can be expected to closely match those of the radiology faculty, and the practice of after-hours interpretation of such studies by radiology residents is safe.     

CT肺动脉成像诊断肺栓塞的读片者一致性研究

目的:评价CT肺动脉成像(CTPA)诊断肺栓塞(PE)时,不同经验的读片者间和同一读片者内的一致性.方法:55例临床可疑PE患者,作了CTPA检查,6位不同经验的放射科医生独立地分析CTPA图像来评价读片者间的一致性.3位放射科医生3个月后第二次分析CTPA图像来评价读片者内的一致性.PE的表现分为阳性、阴性和难以确定.读片者一致性用百分比及Kappa系数表示.结果:6位读片者判定29～31例(平均29.2例)患者CTPA为PE阳性,1～5例(平均3.0例)患者CTPA为难以确定.6位读片者在48例(87.3%)患者CTPA的诊断上取得一致意见,5位读片者在4例患者(7.3%)的诊断上取得一致意见,4位读片者在2例患者(3.6%)的诊断上取得一致意见,3位读片者在1例患者(1.8%)的诊断上取得一致意见.在诊断PE上,如果以每例患者为观察单位,读片者间的一致性"非常好"(Kappa值为0.91).以每个肺动脉为观察单位,读片者间的一致性"好"(85%,Kappa值为0.74);以肺叶动脉为观察单位,读片者间的一致性"好"(89%,Kappa值为0.78);以肺段动脉为观察单位,读片者间的一致性"中等"(75%,Kappa值为0.59).如果以每例患者为观察单位,同一读片者内的平均一致性"非常好"(96%,Kappa值为0.93).结论:在CTPA上诊断PE时,经验不同的读片者间和同一读片者内的一致性均较好.     

Nonenhanced limited CT in children suspected of having appendicitis: prospective comparison of attending and resident interpretations.

PURPOSE: To prospectively compare resident and attending radiologic interpretations of nonenhanced limited computed tomographic (CT) scans obtained in children suspected of having appendicitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five consecutive children underwent nonenhanced limited CT for suspected appendicitis. The scans were prospectively interpreted by a resident and an attending radiologist, each unaware of the other's interpretation. The probability that the findings indicated a diagnosis of appendicitis, level of certainty in the interpretation, and presence of an alternate diagnosis were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Nineteen children (25%) had appendicitis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was not significantly different between residents (0.97 +/- 0.02) and attendings (0.95 +/- 0.04). The percentage agreement between residents and attendings was 91% (kappa = 0.73 +/- 0.095). The average level of certainty tended to be higher for attendings (93% +/- 15) than residents (89% +/- 12). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of resident interpretations were 63%, 96%, and 88%, respectively, compared with those of attending interpretations--95%, 98%, and 97%, respectively. Residents and attendings noted alternate diagnoses in 30% of children without appendicitis. CONCLUSION: A high level of agreement exists between resident and attending radiologists in the interpretation of nonenhanced limited CT scans in children suspected of having appendicitis. Residents, however, tend to be less confident in their interpretations.     

The Interobserver Agreement between Residents and Experienced Radiologists for Detecting Pulmonary Embolism and DVT with Using CT Pulmonary Angiography and Indirect CT Venography

Objective

We wanted to prospectively evaluate the interobserver agreement between radiology residents and expert radiologists for interpreting CT images for making the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (PE).

Materials and Methods

We assessed 112 consecutive patients, from April 2007 to August 2007, who were referred for combined CT pulmonary angiography and indirect CT venography for clinically suspected acute PE. CT scanning was performed with a 64×0.5 collimation multi-detector CT scanner. The CT studies were initially interpreted by the radiology residents alone and then the CT images were subsequently interpreted by a consensus of the resident plus an experienced general radiologist and an experienced chest radiologist.

Results

Two of the 112 CTs were unable to be interpreted (1.7%). Pulmonary artery clots were seen on 36 of the thoracic CT angiographies (32%). The interobserver agreement between the radiology residents and the consensus interpretation was good (a kappa index of 0.73). All of the disagreements (15 cases) were instances of overcall by the resident on the initial interpretation. Deep venous thrombosis was detected in 72% (26 of 36) of the patients who had PE seen on thoracic CT. The initial and consensus interpretations of the CT venography images disagreed for two cases (kappa statistic: 0.96).

Conclusion

It does not seem adequate to base the final long-term treatment of PE on only the resident''s reading, as false positives occurred in 13% of such cases. Timely interpretation of the CT pulmonary angiography and CT venography images should be performed by experienced radiologists for the patients with suspected PE.     

Emergency physician error rates for interpretation of plain radiographs and utilization of radiologist consultation

Emergency physicians’ errors of interpretation of plain radiographs and these physicians’ utilization of radiologist consultation services were studied. During daytime hours over a 3-month period, 953 radiograph packets on emergency department patients were reviewed in the radiology department after initial interpretation by an emergency department physician. Consultation requests and clinically significant discordances between radiology and emergency department interpretations were tabulated. Discordances were categorized by the type of examination and the type of error. The time between each packet’s arrival in the radiology department and issuance of a report was recorded. After completion of data collection, all of the discrepant cases were reviewed by a staff emergency room physician and a staff radiologist to establish the proper interpretation and the source of the discordance. Radiologist consultation was requested for 106 (11.1%) of the packets. Of the 847 packets for which the emergency room physician did not request radiologist consultation, radiologist and emergency physician interpretations agreed in 776 (91.6%) and were discordant in 71 (8.4%) of the packets. Of 65 cases available for discrepancy review, the reviewers agreed with the radiologist’s interpretation in 60 (92%) of the cases and disagreed in 5 (8%) of the cases. Ten (17%) of the discordances were the result of overcalls, 47 (78%) were the result of overlooked findings, and 3 (5%) were the result of misinterpretations of findings. Sixty-eight percent of the discordances in interpretation were made to chest studies, 15% to abdominal studies, and 17% to musculoskeletal studies. Emergency physicians at the study institution requested consultations from a radiologist in 11.1% of cases. They made potentially important errors on independent interpretation of plain radiographs in 60 of 847 (7.1%) of cases for which consultation was not sought. Radiologists misinterpreted radiographs in 5 cases. These data suggest that radiologists play an important role in emergency health care delivery and should continue to routinely interpret all emergency department radiographs.     

Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prior studies have revealed little difference in residents' abilities to interpret cranial CT scans. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of radiology residents at different levels of training in the interpretation of emergency head CT images. METHODS: Radiology residents prospectively interpreted 1324 consecutive head CT scans ordered in the emergency department at the University of Arizona Health Science Center. The residents completed a preliminary interpretation form that included their interpretation and confidence in that interpretation. One of five neuroradiologists with a Certificate of Added Qualification subsequently interpreted the images and classified their assessment of the residents' interpretations as follows: "agree," "disagree-insignificant," or "disagree-significant." The data were analyzed by using analysis-of-variance or chi-squared methods. RESULTS: Overall, the agreement rate was 91%; the insignificant disagreement rate, 7%; and the significant disagreement rate, 2%. The level of training had a significant (P =.032) effect on the rate of agreement; upper-level residents had higher rates of agreement than those of more junior residents. There were 62 false-negative findings. The most commonly missed findings were fractures (n = 18) and chronic ischemic foci (n = 12). The most common false-positive interpretations involved 10 suspected intracranial hemorrhages and suspected fractures. CONCLUSION: The level of resident training has a significant effect on the rate of disagreement between the preliminary interpretations of emergency cranial CT scans by residents and the final interpretations by neuroradiologists. Efforts to reduce residents' errors should focus on the identification of fractures and signs of chronic ischemic change.     

From Being a Radiologist to Watching a Radiologist: Impact of Filmless Operation on the Training of Radiology Residents

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to investigate the impact of changing from a film-based image interpretation system to one using digital image workstations on the training of radiology residents in the interpretation of radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected during a period when a conventional system of image interpretation with hard-copy images and multiviewers was used and during a period when digital image workstations were used. During each period, it was noted whether the first interpretation of the radiographs was performed by a radiology resident, by an attending radiologist, or as a group effort including both an attending radiologist and a radiology resident(s). In addition, it was noted whether a radiology resident or an attending radiologist dictated the report. RESULTS: The proportion of images first interpreted by the radiology resident alone decreased from 38% (53 of 139) when using the conventional system to 17% (34 of 199) after the switch to interpreting images on the workstations (P = .001). During the film-based period, radiology residents dictated 45% of reports (141 of 312), but during the workstation period, radiology residents dictated only 4% of reports (24 of 667; P = .001). CONCLUSION: The authors observed a decrease in autonomous participation by radiology residents in image interpretation and dictation of reports and an increase in "group reading" after the switch from a film-based system to a workstation system.     

Does addition of CT pelvic venography to CT pulmonary angiography protocols contribute to the diagnosis of thromboembolic disease?

AIM: To evaluate the contribution which addition of pelvic computed tomography venography (CTV) to a standard CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) imaging protocol makes to a definitive diagnosis of thromboembolic disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and six consecutive patients over the age of 55 years referred for (CTPA) for suspected pulmonary embolism between June and November 1999 had pelvic CTV performed at the time of the CTPA study. RESULTS: Ninety-six of 106 CTPA studies were technically adequate. In total, 29/96 (29.6%) CTPA studies were positive for pulmonary embolism, 10/96 (10.4%) CTV studies were positive and five of these 10 examinations showed venous thrombus when the CTPA study was negative (n = 4) or equivocal (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Addition of CTV shows residual thrombus in the pelvis in a proportion of patients with positive CTPA studies and demonstrates venous thrombus in a small number of patients with no CT evidence of pulmonary embolism.     

Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of radiology resident preliminary interpretation errors for plain film, body computed tomography, and neuroradiology (neuro)computed tomographic examinations read on call. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the data in a prospectively acquired resident quality assurance (QA) database dating between January 2000 and March 2007. The database comprises all imaging studies initially interpreted by an on-call resident and later reviewed by a board-certified attending radiologist who determined the level of discrepancy between the two interpretations according to a graded scale from 0 (no discrepancy) to 3 (major discrepancy). We reviewed the data with respect to resident training level, imaging modality, and variance level. Statistical analysis was performed with chi(2) test, alpha = 0.05. We compared our results with other published series studying resident and attending accuracy. RESULTS: A total of 141,381 cases were entered into the database during the review period. Of all examinations, 95.7% had zero variance, 3.3% minor variance, and 1.0% major variance. There was a slight, statistically significant increase in overall accuracy with increased resident year from 95.4% of examinations read by first-year residents (R1s) to 96.1% by fourth-year resident (R4s) (P < .0001). Overall percentages of exams with major discrepancies were 1.0% for R1s, 1.1% for second-year residents, 1.0% for third-year residents, and 0.98% for R4s. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of preliminary resident interpretations are highly accurate. The incidence of major discrepancies is extremely low and similar, even with R1s, to that of attending radiologists published in other studies. A slight, statistically significant decrease in the error rate is detectable as residents gain experience throughout the 4 years of residency.     

Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center

OBJECTIVE: At many academic institutions, preliminary interpretations of CT scans and sonograms obtained after regular hours of operation are performed by radiology residents, with attending radiologists reviewing the interpretations the next morning. We sought to determine the rate of discrepancy between residents' interpretations of imaging studies and the final interpretations performed by an attending body imaging radiologist as well as any resulting clinical consequences stemming from the discrepancies. Therefore, we reviewed 928 CT and sonographic images that had been obtained after hours at a level 1 trauma center during a 6-month period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Any discrepancies between the preliminary and final interpretations were judged as either major (i.e., necessitating an urgent change in treatment) or minor errors. We conducted patient follow-up via a retrospective review of the medical charts to determine whether any of the discrepancies led to additional imaging, an increase in patient morbidity, an extension of a hospital stay, or a change in treatment. RESULTS: The overall discrepancy rate in interpretations rendered by the residents and those performed by the attending radiologist was 3.8%, with most of these discrepancies (86%) judged to be minor. If we combined the data for body CT scans and sonograms, the rate of minor discrepancies was 3.2%, and the rate of major discrepancies was 0.5%. If we considered only body CT data in the evaluation, the overall discrepancy rate increased to 6.4%, with a 5.4% rate of minor discrepancies and a 1.0% rate of major discrepancies. CONCLUSION: Our evaluation of discrepancy rates was unusual in that we included interpretations of sonograms, on which residents and the attending radiologist had a higher rate of agreement (99.5%). Because of the high agreement in the interpretation of sonograms, the overall discrepancy rate was 3.8%. However, if only body CT scan interpretations were evaluated, our results were closer to the rates reported in previously published studies. Major discrepancies led to a change in patient treatment but did not lead to any increase in patient morbidity or to any quantifiable increase in the length of the hospital stay.     

Computer-assisted detection of pulmonary embolism: evaluation of pulmonary CT angiograms performed in an on-call setting

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to assess the stand-alone performance of computer-assisted detection (CAD) for evaluation of pulmonary CT angiograms (CTPA) performed in an on-call setting.

Methods

In this institutional review board-approved study, we retrospectively included 292 consecutive CTPA performed during night shifts and weekends over a period of 16 months. Original reports were compared with a dedicated CAD system for pulmonary emboli (PE). A reference standard for the presence of PE was established using independent evaluation by two readers and consultation of a third experienced radiologist in discordant cases.

Results

Original reports had described 225 negative studies and 67 positive studies for PE. CAD found PE in seven patients originally reported as negative but identified by independent evaluation: emboli were located in segmental (n?=?2) and subsegmental arteries (n?=?5). The negative predictive value (NPV) of the CAD algorithm was 92% (44/48). On average there were 4.7 false positives (FP) per examination (median 2, range 0–42). In 72% of studies ≤5 FP were found, 13% of studies had ≥10 FP.

Conclusion

CAD identified small emboli originally missed under clinical conditions and found 93% of the isolated subsegmental emboli. On average there were 4.7 FP per examination.     

Academic radiology and the emergency department: does it need changing?

RATIONAL AND OBJECTIVES: The increasing importance of imaging for both diagnosis and management in patient care has resulted in a demand for radiology services 7 days a week, 24 hours a day, especially in the emergency department (ED). We hypothesized the resident preliminary reports were better than generalist radiology interpretations, although inferior to subspecialty interpretations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Total radiology volume through our Level I pediatric and adult academic trauma ED was obtained from the radiology information system. We conducted a literature search for error and discordant rates between radiologists of varying experience. For a 2-week prospective period, all preliminary reports generated by the residents and final interpretations were collected. Significant changes in the report were tabulated. RESULTS: The ED requested 72,886 imaging studies in 2004 (16% of the total radiology department volume). In a 2-week period, 12 of 1929 (0.6%) preliminary reports by residents were discordant to the final subspecialty dictation. In the 15 peer-reviewed publications documenting error rates in radiology, the error rate between American Board of Radiology (ABR)-certified radiologists is greater than that between residents and subspecialists in the literature and in our study. However, the perceived error rate by clinicians outside radiology is significantly higher. CONCLUSION: Sixteen percent of the volume of imaging studies comes through the ED. The residents handle off-hours cases with a radiology-detected error rate below the error rate between ABR-certified radiologists. To decrease the perceived clinician-identified error rate, we need to change how academic radiology handles ED cases.     

Comparing the interpretations of CT pulmonary angiograms by attending and resident radiologists: can residents identify life-threatening pulmonary emboli in hospitalized patients?

Objective: CT pulmonary angiography is now often the first-line investigation for pulmonary emboli. When these studies are performed after hours in teaching hospitals, they are often initially interpreted by trainees. It is of great significance whether the interpretations of trainees and certified radiologists with regard to the presence of pulmonary emboli on CT pulmonary angiograms correspond, because of the morbidity and mortality of both the condition and its treatment. Material and methods: Twenty-five consecutive CT pulmonary angiograms (CTPAs) of hospitalized patients were viewed at lung and soft tissue windows both on a workstation and on hard copies, at the observers' discretion. Each CTPA was divided into 28 arterial zones based on pulmonary anatomy (including the subsegmental arteries), giving a total of 700 arterial zones, and analyzed retrospectively and independently by two cross-sectional imaging specialists and four residents. Each arterial segment was rated with regard to pulmonary embolus as either high, intermediate, or low probability or not visualized. The kappa (Κ) test, which tests for interobserver agreement, was used for statistical analysis. Results: At the time of the scan all patients were hospitalized for underlying conditions. Of the 25 patients studied, 9 were referred from the ICU, 7 experienced severe acute shortness of breath and respiratory failure, 5 were post-partum women, 2 had had a recent stroke, 1 patient had antithrombin III deficiency, and 1 had a diagnosis of breast cancer. The incidence of pulmonary emboli was 44%. For the main pulmonary arteries interobserver agreement was good (Κ=0.61) and for the segmental pulmonary arteries it was fair (Κ=0.26). For the subsegmental arteries interobserver agreement was poor (Κ=0.16). The zones where interobserver agreement was greatest (Κ>0.4) were the left main, left lower lobe, and the right main pulmonary arteries. Interobserver agreement was poorest (Κ<0.05) in the left interlobar, left lower lobe lateral basal segment, right lower lobe superior segment, and left lower lobe superior segment branches. None of the patients expired due to pulmonary emboli. Conclusion: Most life-threatening pulmonary emboli requiring urgent treatment are the more central emboli. This study demonstrates that trainees and certified radiologists can make similar conclusions regarding these central pulmonary emboli in hospitalized patients and that preliminary interpretations by trainees should not therefore adversely affect patient care. Electronic Publication     

Can CT pulmonary angiography replace ventilation-perfusion scans as a first line investigation for pulmonary emboli?

A prospective study was performed to determine efficacy of diagnosis of pulmonary emboli by computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) in patients who underwent both CTPA and ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) scanning. The results were compared with the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) study in which conventional pulmonary angiography had been performed instead of CTPA. Forty-two of 161 (26%) patients had a positive CTPA compared with a 27% prevalence in the PIOPED population. Fourteen of 16 patients (87.5%) with high-probability V/Q scans also had a positive CTPA compared with 87% in PIOPED. Twelve of 40 patients (30%) with intermediate probability V/Q scans also had a positive CTPA compared with 34.7% in PIOPED, while 12 of 80 patients (15%) who had low-probability V/Q scans had positive CTPA compared with 14.5% in PIOPED. Four of 25 patients (16%) with normal V/Q scans had positive CTPA compared with 0% in PIOPED. While the present study size was relatively small, the results compared favourably with PIOPED, suggesting that equivalent prevalence of clot was being detected using CTPA. This result, together with the cost considerations, has led us to replace V/Q scanning with CTPA for investigation of the majority of cases of suspected, acute pulmonary emboli.     

Resident interpretation of emergency computed tomographic scans

Our busy, urban emergency room is staffed by radiology residents after working hours. To determine the accuracy of our residents' interpretations of emergency cranial computed tomographic (CT) scans, the authors reviewed the preliminary reports of our residents for a two-month period. A total of 289 cranial CT scans were retrospectively reviewed and the resident interpretation judged acceptable, minor error, moderate error, or major error. Six of 289 neurologic examinations (2%) had moderate (4) or major (2) errors. The mistakes all involved misinterpretation of cerebral hemorrhage. The 98% accuracy in interpretation of cranial CT is higher than the accuracy reported with emergency plain film (PF) interpretation.     

Scintigraphic Evidence for Overdiagnosis of Small PE on CT Pulmonary Angiography

A 68-year-old man with recent history of a fall presented with dyspnea on exertion, and underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for possible pulmonary embolism (PE). The CTPA was first read by the radiology resident as nondiagnostic for segmental PE. Subsequent planar perfusion (Q) images were normal; meanwhile, the attending radiologist revised the CTPA results as subsegmental PE in the left upper lobe. Further Q-SPECT images were obtained and fused with CTPA for clarification, which showed normal perfusion in the region of PE. The patient was monitored without anticoagulation treatment and remained uneventful for 12 months. This case illustrates that CTPA can lead to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of nonocclusive subsegmental PE.     

The use of a D-dimer assay in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus.

PURPOSE: To assess the ability of a semi-quantitative latex agglutination D-dimer test Accuclot with bedside measurements of arterial oxygen saturation, respiratory and cardiac rates to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) on computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients referred to our CT unit for investigation of suspected acute pulmonary embolism were enrolled. Pulse oximetery, respiratory rate, heart rate and blood sampling for D-dimer testing were carried out just before CT. A high resolution CT (HRCT) of the chest was followed by a CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA). The images were independently interpreted at a workstation with cine-paging and 2D reformation facilities by three consultant radiologists blinded to the clinical and laboratory data. If positive, the level of the most proximal embolus was recorded. Discordant imaging results were re-read collectively and consensus achieved. RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were enrolled. The CTPA was positive for PE in 28/101 (28%). The D-dimer was positive in 65/101 (65%). Twenty-six patients had a positive CT and positive D-dimer, two a positive CT but negative D-dimer, 39 a negative CT and positive D-dimer, and 34 a negative CT and negative D-dimer. The negative predictive value of the Accuclot D-dimer test for excluding a pulmonary embolus on spiral CT was 0.94. Combining the D-dimer result with pulse oximetry (normal SaO2 > or = 90%) improved the negative predictive value to 0.97. CONCLUSION: A negative Accuclot D-dimer assay proved highly predictive for a negative CT pulmonary angiogram in suspected acute pulmonary embolus. If this D-dimer assay were included in the diagnostic algorithm of these patients a negative D-dimer would have unnecessary CTPA rendered in 36% of patients.