Long-term comparison of alprazolam, lorazepam and placebo in patients with an anxiety disorder

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 200 patients with moderate to moderately severe anxiety we compared the anxiolytic efficacy and safety of alprazolam and lorazepam. Dosing was flexible and ranged from 1 to 4.5 mg/day of alprazolam and from 2 to 9 mg/day of lorazepam. The mean daily dose at the end of the 16 week study was alprazolam 3.3 mg and lorazepam 5.1 mg. Both active drugs were significantly more effective than placebo in relieving the symptoms of anxiety on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, with a trend toward more improvement in the alprazolam group in the later weeks of the study. Target Symptoms, Physician's and Patient's Global Impressions and the Self Rating Symptom Scale indicate that alprazolam and lorazepam were superior to placebo. The major side effects were sedation and drowsiness; the frequency was similar for alprazolam and lorazepam and twice as high for active drug as placebo. An overall rating of side effect severity was not significantly different among the three groups.     

Alprazolam SR in the treatment of generalized anxiety: a multicentre controlled study with bromazepam

A multicentre, double‐blind, randomized trial compared the efficacy of a sustained‐release formulation of alprazolam with bromazepam in the treatment of generalized anxiety. One hundred and twenty‐one outpatients were randomly assigned to three weeks of active treatment with alprazolam SR (2 mg once daily) or bromazepam (3 mg three times daily), following a period of 3–7 days without medication. After treatment, doses were reduced by 50 per cent during a 1‐week dosage‐tapering period; patients were then followed for one additional week. There was no significant difference in the anxiolytic effects of alprazolam SR and bromazepam. The results in the two treatment groups were very similar and showed a rapid and statistically significant reduction in efficacy measures, including the total score on the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression improvement and severity of illness scores. The mean changes from baseline scores were compared between treatments at each evaluation point and no statistically significant differences were observed. At week 3, more than 70 per cent of patients in the alprazolam SR and bromazepam groups were classified as responders. In conclusion, alprazolam SR, in a single daily dose, has a rapid onset of action and is effective in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. Its anxiolytic activity is similar to that of bromazepam taken in several daily doses and it has the advantage of enhancing patient compliance and reducing the potential for breakthrough anxiety. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Alprazolam and lorazepam single and multiple-dose effects on psychomotor skills and sleep

Summary The effects of alprazolam 0.5 mg and lorazepam 2 mg on cognitive and psychomotor skills were assessed in twelve normal volunteer subjects in a randomised, double-blind, crossover design. Single and multiple dose effects were monitored using a battery of tests comprising critical flicker fusion threshold (CFFT), choice reaction time (CRT), simulated car tracking, and subjective ratings of perceived sedation (LARS) and of sleep behaviour (LSEQ). Compared with placebo baseline scores, treatment with lorazepam 2 mg (both single and multiple doses) resulted in a widespread impairment of CRT, tracking accuracy, and CFFT. Single doses of alprazolam 0.5 mg reduced CFFT with respect to the placebo baseline. Single and multiple dose treatment with both drugs resulted in subjective reports of sedation, a reduction of sleep onset latency, and improved sleep quality. Only lorazepam 2 mg significantly disrupted the integrity of behaviour on waking from sleep. These results suggest important pharmacodynamic differences between the two drugs in the doses used.     

Kinetics and dynamics of intravenous adinazolam, N-desmethyl adinazolam, and alprazolam in healthy volunteers

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of adinazolam mesylate (10 mg), N-desmethyl adinazolam mesylate (NDMAD, 10 mg), and alprazolam (1 mg) were investigated in 9 healthy male subjects in a randomized, blinded, single-dose, 4-way crossover study. All drugs were intravenously infused over 30 minutes. Plasma adinazolam, NDMAD, and alprazolam concentrations, electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in the beta (12-30 Hz) range, performance on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and subjective measures of mood and sedation were monitored for 12 to 24 hours. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters for adinazolam, NDMAD, and alprazolam, respectively, were as follows: volume of distribution (L), 106, 100, and 77; elimination half-life (hours), 2.9, 2.8, and 14.6; and clearance (mL/min), 444, 321, and 84. More than 80% of the total infused adinazolam dose was converted to systemically appearing NDMAD. All 3 benzodiazepine agonists significantly increased beta EEG activity, with alprazolam showing the strongest agonist activity and adinazolam showing the weakest activity. Alprazolam and NDMAD significantly decreased DSST performance, whereas adinazolam had no effect relative to placebo. Adinazolam, NDMAD, and alprazolam all produced significant observer-rated sedation. Plots of EEG effect versus plasma alprazolam concentration demonstrated counterclockwise hysteresis, consistent with an effect site delay. This was incorporated into a kinetic-dynamic model in which hypothetical effect site concentration was related to pharmacodynamic EEG effect via the sigmoid E(max) model, yielding an effect site equilibration half-life of 4.8 minutes. The exponential effect model described NDMAD pharmacokinetics and EEG pharmacodynamics. The relation of both alprazolam and NDMAD plasma concentrations to DSST performance could be described by a modified exponential model. Pharmacokinetic-dynamic modeling was not possible for adinazolam, as the data did not conform to any known concentration-effect model. Collectively, these results indicate that the benzodiazepine-like effects occurring after adinazolam administration are mediated by mainly NDMAD.     

Clonazepam and sertraline: absence of drug interaction in a multiple-dose study

Thirteen subjects (seven men, six women) completed a placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind, crossover study to determine whether an interaction occurs between clonazepam and sertraline. Ten days of once-daily doses of either clonazepam 1 mg and placebo (CZ + PL) or clonazepam 1 mg and sertraline 100 mg (CZ + SR) were administered; there was an 11-day washout period. Sertraline did not significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of clonazepam (p > 0.13). Clonazepam apparent oral clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life were 3.9 +/- 0.2 L/hr, 233 +/-11 L, and 40.5 +/- 0.3 hours, respectively. The kinetics of the inactive metabolite 7-aminoclonazepam were marginally affected by sertraline, with a 21% decrease in the elimination half-life (p = 0.03) relative to CZ + PL and no significant difference between treatments in area under the curve or metabolite ratio. Card sorting (CS), digit-symbol substitution test (DSST), nurse-rated sedation scale (NRSS), and self-rated sedation scores were assessed four times daily on days -1 (PL + PL), 1, 4, 7, and 10. There were no differences between treatments in area under the effect curve or maximum observed effect for CS, DSST, or NRSS. Maximum impairment on all assessment days was low, with a less than 10% change from the drug-free values for CS and DSST. Despite higher clonazepam concentrations, predose (time 0) psychomotor and sedation scores did not differ among days -1, 1, 4, 7, and 10 or between treatments. These results in healthy volunteers indicate that sertraline does not affect the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of clonazepam.     

The effects of clobazam and lorazepam on aspects of psychomotor performance and car handling ability.

1 Laboratory tests of psychomotor performance and 'on road' assessments of car handling ability were made following repeated doses of clobazam 10 mg three times daily, lorazepam 1 mg three times daily and matching placebo 1 capsule three times daily. 2 Both active compounds produced on impairment, compared to placebo, in some mental arithmetic and letter cancellation tasks, but these effects were neither widespread nor consistent. 3 Lorazepam produced a significant impairment of car driving tasks and analogue rating scales of subjective alertness. The pronounced sedative activity of the drug was also shown in the verbal reports of side effects and in indices of early morning sedation derived from the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire. 4 Clobazam did not produce either the objective, or the subjective impairment of performance and alertness found with lorazepam. 5 The results taken as a whole show important differences between the 1,4 benzodiazepine, lorazepam, and the 1,5 benzodiazepine, clobazam, in their effects on the integrity of psychomotor performance related to car driving ability.     

Assessment of the interaction between a partial agonist and a full agonist of benzodiazepine receptors, based on psychomotor performance and memory, in healthy volunteers

Potential interactions between the imidazopyridine anxiolytic alpidem and the full benzodiazepine agonist lorazepam were assessed in a randomized, double-blind, four-way cross-over, placebo-controlled study in 16 healthy young male volunteers. Each volunteer received alpidem, 50 mg, or a placebo twice daily for 8 days with a 1- week wash-out interval. The interaction between alpidem, at the steady state, and a single oral dose of lorazepam 2 mg or a placebo was assessed after concomitant administration on days 7 or 9 of each treatment period. Psycho motor performance and cognitive function were evaluated before and 2, 4, 6 and 8 h post-dose, using objective tests [critical flicker fusion threshold (CFF), choice reaction time (CRT), digit-symbol substitution (DSST), body sway and short-term memory (Sternberg memory scanning)] and self-ratings [line analogue rating scales: (LARS)]. Long-term memory (delayed free recall and recognition of pictures) was assessed before the dose and 2 and 4 h post-dose. Pharmacodynamic interactions were evaluated by applying repeated measures ANOVA to a 2 x 2 factorial interaction model. Alpidem, 50 mg twice daily at the steady state, was free of any clinically relevant detrimental effects on skilled performance, information processing or memory. In contrast, a single 2 mg dose of lorazepam induced marked impairment of psychomotor performance and cognitive function (significant reductions in CFF and DSST and increases in CRT and body sway), as well as subjective sedation from 2 to 8 h post-dose, depending on the test used. In addition, lorazepam induced anterograde amnesia, characterized by a decrease in delayed free recall and recognition, and a deficit in short-term memory. Finally, alpidem 50 mg did not potentiate the detrimental effects of lorazepam 2 mg. On the contrary, alpidem significantly antagonized the lorazepam-induced CRT increase and anterograde amnesia, and produced similar trends on most of the other cognitive parameters; thus, the results obtained with the combination of alpidem and lorazepam consistently indicated less impairment than those measured after lorazepam alone. These results are consistent with the suggested partial agonsist properties of alpidem at the benzodiazepine receptor and indicate that such properties can be assessed in humans based on antagonism of the effects of a full agonist.     

Pharmacokinetic pharmacodynamic evaluation of the combined administration of alprazolam and fluoxetine

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic effects of concomitant administration of alprazolam and fluoxetine were studied in this double-blind parallel study in 80 healthy, male volunteers. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Drug treatments consisted of 4-day regimens of 1 mg alprazolam four times daily, 60 mg fluoxetine every morning, 1 mg alprazolam four times daily and 60 mg fluoxetine every morning, and placebo four times daily. Psychomotor performance, mood status, and degree of sedation were evaluated at designated times. Combined administration of alprazolam and fluoxetine resulted in an approximate 30% increase in plasma alprazolam concentrations relative to plasma concentrations following the administration of alprazolam alone. There were no significant differences in fluoxetine or norfluoxetine plasma concentrations between the alprazolam/fluoxetine and fluoxetine treatments. Psychomotor decrements increased when fluoxetine was administered with alprazolam relative to alprazolam administration alone. Psychomotor performance of the fluoxetine treatment group was not significantly different from that of the placebo group. No significant changes were observed in mood status, and sedation was minimal in all treatment groups. As when any two psychoactive drugs are administered together, increased patient monitoring and patient education is recommended when alprazolam and fluoxetine are prescribed concurrently.     

Influence of dosing regimen on alprazolam and metabolite serum concentrations and tolerance to sedative and psychomotor effects

The relationships between alprazolam and metabolite concentrations and CNS effects were determined in a double-blind placebo controlled four-way crossover trial in 16 normal male volunteers. Active drug treatments consisted of 4-day regimens of 4 mg alprazolam PO daily as 2 mg bid., 1 mg qid, and 0.25 mg each hour. On days 1 and 4, the kinetics, sedative and psychomotor effects were evaluated. Plasma concentrations of the 4- and α-hydroxy metabolites of alprazolam were less than 10% of unchanged alprazolam levels on both days. Accumulation of these metabolites and alprazolam was dependent on alprazolam half-life (11.6 h). Acute and chronic tolerance to the sedative and psychomotor effects was observed with all active drug treatments. All alprazolam treatments resulted in significantly greater sedation than placebo on days 1 and 4. However, on day 4, sedation was 16–36% less than observed on day 1, despite plasma concentrations 1.4–2.76 times the day 1 concentrations. Sedation from alprazolam was reduced in each successive study phase, suggesting a tolerance which was sustained during the 10-day washout between phases. By day 4, psychomotor performance was not different from placebo, indicating more complete development of tolerance than occurred for the sedative effect. Sedation and psychomotor impairment on day 1 were greatest with 2 mg alprazolam bid. During the initiation of therapy, the patient will likely experience less sedation and psychomotor impairment with smaller, more frequent doses. Since tolerance develops to these effects, the advantage of more frequent dosing regimen dissipates by the 4th day.     

Models of memory dysfunction? A comparison of the effects of scopolamine and lorazepam on memory,psychomotor performance and mood

The effects on memory, psychomotor functions and mood of intramuscular scopolamine (0.3 mg, 0.6 mg) were compared with those of oral lorazepam (2 mg) and placebo. Thirty-six volunteers took part in a doubleblind, independent groups design. Subjects completed a battery of tests 1 and 3 h after drug administration. Both doses of scopolamine produced levels of sedation comparable to that produced by lorazepam. The time course of effects of scopolamine and lorazepam differed but the pattern of psychomotor impairments and amnestic effects produced was very similar. In terms of mood, lorazepam had an anxiolytic effect whereas scopolamine increased ratings of anxiety. Levels of sedation, indexed by either subjective ratings or motor retardation (tapping speed), were related more to psychomotor performance than to performance on memory tasks. The results suggest that benzodiazepines and scopolamine have similar amnestic and sedative effects and as such may not offer distinct models of memory dysfunction.     

Effects of alprazolam and lorazepam on catecholaminergic and cardiovascular activity during supine rest,mental load and orthostatic challenge

Effects of oral alprazolam (0.5 and 1 mg) and lorazepam (2 mg) on sympathetic adrenomedullary activity and sedation were studied during supine rest, mental load (Color Word Test, CWT) and active standing (OCT), in 12 male volunteers in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over design. Compared to placebo, alprazolam significantly increased subjective sedation, reduced plasma adrenaline and noradrenaline concentrations and mean blood pressure (MBP) during supine rest, and attenuated plasma adrenaline responses during the CWT and the OCT; these effects during the CWT and OCT appeared to be dose-dependent. In comparison with lorazepam (2 mg), alprazolam (1 mg) showed reduced MBP levels during supine rest, whereas lorazepam showed a higher heart rate level during supine rest, a reduced plasma noradrenaline response to the OCT and a performance deterioration to the CWT. There were no differences between alprazolam (1 mg) and lorazepam regarding subjective sedation. Although the benzodiazepines were similar regarding their increase of sedation, alprazolam and loraze- pam induced differential effects on sympathetic adrenomedullary activity during rest and stress, whereby suppression of adrenomedullary activity may be specific for alprazolam. Received: 13 March 1996 / Final version: 6 June 1996     

Comparison of the spectrum of cognitive effects of alprazolam and adinazolam after single doses in healthy subjects

Single doses of alprazolam (0, 0.5, 1.5 mg) or adinazolam mesylate sustained release tablets (SR) (0, 15, 45 mg) were administered to separate groups of 12 healthy men in a crossover design. Psychomotor performance was assessed by digit symbol substitution (DSST), and memory was assessed using a test battery which reflects various aspects of memory, including attention/working memory, explicit memory (recall of categorically related words), semantic memory (fragmented picture recognition, generation of category exemplars), and implicit memory (time saved in resolving fragmented pictures on the second exposure). Maximal psychomotor performance and memory decrements for the highest active doses were significantly different from placebo for all tasks at some time after dosing. The maximum decrement in DSST was not significantly different between drugs at the high dose (P=0.288). Maximum attention/working memory decrements were significantly different between the high doses of the active compounds (P=0.031), and the difference in maximum category recall decrement was marginally significant (P=0.067). Access to knowledge memory was not significantly altered by these drugs; these results are similar to those obtained for other benzodiazepines. Both drugs exhibited slight effects on implicit memory. The results suggest that the sedative and memory effects of these triazolobenzodiazepines may not be closely related and suggest that adinazolam has a somewhat different spectrum of cognitive effects relative to alprazolam.     

Lack of interaction between a new antihistamine, mizolastine, and lorazepam on psychomotor performance and memory in healthy volunteers.

1. The possible interaction between a new H1 antihistamine, mizolastine, and lorazepam was assessed in a randomised, double-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study involving 16 healthy young male volunteers who received mizolastine 10 mg or placebo once daily for 8 days with a 1 week wash-out interval. The interaction of mizolastine, at steady-state, with a single oral dose of lorazepam or placebo was assessed on days 6 or 8 of each treatment period. 2. Psychomotor performance and cognitive function were evaluated using objective tests (critical flicker fusion threshold, choice reaction time, tapping, arithmetic calculation, body sway) and self-ratings (visual analogue scale, ARCI) before and at 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after dosing. Short-term memory (Sternberg memory scanning immediate free recall of a word list) and long-term memory (delayed free recall and recognition of words and pictures) were assessed before and at 3 h after dosing. Pharmacodynamic interactions were evaluated by repeated measures ANOVA in a 2 x 2 factorial interaction model. 3. Mizolastine, 10 mg once daily, at steady-state, was devoid of sedation and detrimental effect on skilled performance and memory. 4. In contrast, a single 2 mg dose of lorazepam produced marked impairment of psychomotor performance, cognitive functions (significant reduction in flicker fusion threshold, tapping and arithmetic calculation and increase in reaction times and body sway) and subjective sedation from 2 to 8 h after dosing. In addition, lorazepam induced an anterograde amnesia, characterised by a decrease in delayed free recall and recognition, and a deficit in short term memory.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Psychomotor effects of alprazolam and diazepam during acute and subacute treatment, and during the follow-up phase

Psychomotor effects of alprazolam (AZ) and diazepam (DZ) were compared in a controlled double-blind and cross-over trial in 24 student volunteers, who received, three times daily, placebo for the first 4 days, then an active drug (AZ) 0.25 mg or DZ 5 mg) for 7 days, and again placebo for 3 days. After a 3 week wash-out period the procedure was repeated with the comparative drug. Objective and subjective measurements were made on day 3 (placebo), on days 4 and 10 (active drug) and on days 11, 12 and 13 (follow-up placebo). Baseline levels were measured in the morning, a capsule was taken, and the tests were repeated 2 hours and 8 hours later. Blood samples were taken in the afternoon of day 10 for the bioassay of serum benzodiazepine concentrations. Single doses of both AZ 0.25 mg and DZ 5 mg showed similar degree of impairment in several objective tests. At the end of the 7-day maintenance DZ (15 mg daily) proved significantly more sedative and impaired more psychomotor performance than AZ (0.75 mg daily) did. Improvement of the complex test performances (a learning effect) was counteracted by DZ more than by AZ. No actual development of tolerance was demonstrated after either drug. During the follow-up placebo phase, DZ showed more objective residual effects than AZ. The Maddox wing test (exophoria) showed a significant DZ effect to be still present on the third post-treatment day. However, during the follow-up period subjects reported subjectively more sedation and clumsiness after AZ than after DZ, but this was not associated with impairment of objective skills.     

Acute behavioral effects of lorazepam and caffeine, alone and in combination, in humans

The widespread use of benzodiazepines and caffeine makes their combined use inevitable. The purpose of the present experiment was to assess the acute effects of lorazepam (0,2.8 and 5.6mg/70kg) and caffeine (0, 250 and 500mg/70kg), alone and in combination, on human learning, performance and self-reports. Subjects were nine healthy, male volunteers. Subjects received all possible combinations according to a Latin Square design. Lorazepam administered alone dose-dependently disrupted learning and performance on the Repeated Acquisition and Performance procedure and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and increased subject ratings of sedation. Caffeine administered alone did not affect learning, performance or subject ratings to a statistically significant degree. Caffeine attenuated lorazepam-induced decrements in learning and performance on the Repeated Acquisition and Performance procedure and DSST. Consistent with the learning and performance measures, caffeine offset lorazepam-induced increases in subject ratings of sedation. These results demonstrate that caffeine generally attenuates the behavioral and self-reported effects of lorazepam on a variety of performance measures. An important extension of these findings would be to test the combined effects of lorazepam and caffeine in other behavioral paradigms such as drug self-administration.     

Interaction of metoprolol with lorazepam and bromazepam

Summary The interaction between metoprolol and bromazepam and lorazepam was studied in 12 healthy male volunteers aged 21–37 years.Metoprolol had no significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of bromazepam or lorazepam. However, bromazepam AUC was 35% higher in the presence of metoprolol. Bromazepam enhanced the effect of metoprolol on systolic blood pressure but not on diastolic blood pressure or pulse rate. Lorazepam had no effect on either blood pressure or pulse. Metoprolol did not enhance the effect of bromazepam on the psychomotor tests used in this study. Metoprolol caused a small increase in critical flicker fusion threshold with lorazepam but had no effect on the other tests. Lorazepam (2 mg) was more potent than bromazepam (6 mg) in the doses used in this study.The interaction of metoprolol with bromazepam and lorazepam is unlikely to be of clinical significance. No change in dose is necessary when using these drugs together.     

Clinical pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and behavioral toxicity of alprazolam: a review of the literature

Alprazolam is a benzodiazepine derivative that is currently used in the treatment of generalized anxiety, panic attacks with or without agoraphobia, and depression. Alprazolam has a fast onset of symptom relief (within the first week); it is unlikely to produce dependency or abuse. No tolerance to its therapeutic effect has been reported. At discontinuation of alprazolam treatment, withdrawal and rebound symptoms are common. Hence, alprazolam discontinuation must be tapered. An exhaustive review of the literature showed that alprazolam is significantly superior to placebo, and is at least equally effective in the relief of symptoms as tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), such as imipramine. However, although alprazolam and imipramine are significantly more effective than placebo in the treatment of panic attacks, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) appear to be superior to either of the two drugs. Therefore, alprazolam is recommended as a second line treatment option, when SSRIs are not effective or well tolerated. In addition to its therapeutic effects, alprazolam produces adverse effects, such as drowsiness and sedation. Since alprazolam is widely used, many clinical studies investigated its cognitive and psychomotor effects. It is evident from these studies that alprazolam may impair performance in a variety of skills in healthy volunteers as well as in patients. Since the majority of alprazolam users are outpatients, this behavioral impairment limits the safe use of alprazolam in patients routinely engaged in potentially dangerous daily activities, such as driving a car.     

Metronidazole impairs clearance of phenytoin but not of alprazolam or lorazepam

Healthy volunteers received single doses of either phenytoin (300 mg IV), alprazolam (1 mg orally) or lorazepam (2 mg IV) on two occasions in random sequence. One of the two trials was a control; for the other trial, subjects ingested metronidazole, 250 mg three times daily beginning 4 days prior to and continuing for the duration of each kinetic study. Compared with control, metronidazole significantly prolonged phenytoin half-life (23 versus 16 hours, P less than .02) and reduced its clearance (.28 versus .33 mL/min/kg, P less than .005), known to depend on aromatic hydroxylation. However, metronidazole did not significantly alter kinetic variables for either alprazolam (metabolized by aliphatic hydroxylation) or lorazepam (metabolized by glucuronide conjugation). Thus, metronidazole has the capacity to impair the clearance of certain oxidatively metabolized drugs, but there is no apparent way to predict which drugs will be so influenced.     

Comparative Study of the Abuse Liability of Alprazolam,Lorazepam, Diazepam,Methaqualone, and Placebo

Subjective effects of two benzodiazepines–alprazolam and lorazepam– were compared with two drugs of known abuse potential–diazepam and methaqualone–and placebo. This double-blind, crossover trial tested 30 casual recreational sedative users in a seminaturalistic setting. Methaqualone was more euphoriant and less sedative than the benzodiazepines. Diazepam and lorazepam were more euphoriant than placebo; alprazolam's euphoriant effect did not differ from these treatments. On other measures of abuse liability the benzodiazepines rated similarly, diazepam rating highest.     

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alprazolam following single and multiple oral doses of a sustained-release formulation

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of alprazolam after IV and oral sustained-release (SR) tablet administration were evaluated in 42 healthy, normal, male volunteers. All 42 subjects received a single 1-mg intravenous (IV) alprazolam dose. After a 1-week washout period, the subjects received one of three SR treatments as a single dose: one 1-mg SR tablet, three 1-mg SR tablets, or six 1-mg SR tablets. Beginning 2 days after single-dose SR treatment, each subject received the above SR doses for 3 days. The daily dose for the multiple-dose study was the same as the subject received in the single-dose study. Serial blood samples were collected after each treatment (single-dose IV, single-dose SR, and after the last SR multiple dose), and plasma samples were analyzed by high performance liquid chromatography. Sedation was assessed by a blinded observer at each blood sampling time. Mean pharmacokinetic parameters for IV administration were consistent with previous results. Pharmacokinetic parameters for the SR doses were consistent with linear kinetics over the dosage range studied. The mean absolute bioavailabilities of the SR tablets were greater than 0.84 after single SR doses. Maximal sedation was related to dose after single-dose SR administration. During multiple dosing, chronic tolerance was observed. Maximal sedation scores after 3 days of alprazolam SR administration were independent of the dose administered and were lower after multiple-dose administration than scores observed after single oral SR doses, although plasma alprazolam concentrations were at least 1.5 times higher with multiple dosing. Sedation data indicate that oral SR doses were well tolerated in multiple dosing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)