Comparison of Doppler echocardiographic methods of determining cardiac minute volume

In 40 patients without valvular disease, cardiac output was determined by pulsed Doppler echocardiography and thermodilution simultaneously. The sample volume was located in the center of the mitral valve ring, at the tips of the mitral leaflets and in the left ventricular outflow tract, directly proximal to the aortic valve leaflets. Circular cross-sectional areas of the mitral valve ring, aortic ring and bulbus of the aorta were calculated from the M-mode and two dimensional echocardiographic diameters. The mitral orifice was assumed to be an ellipse with varying short axes, determined as the mean diastolic leaflet separation in the M-mode and a constant long axis, derived from the maximal mitral orifice area or mitral ring diameter. Cardiac output was calculated by multiplying time-velocity integrals with different areas and heart rate. Cardiac output, measured by the thermodilution technique, ranged from 4.0 l/min to 10.2 l/min. Cardiac output determined by the different Doppler methods correlated significantly with the thermodilution measurements. Cardiac output measurements in the left ventricular outflow tract provided the best correlation coefficient (0.93) and a standard error of the estimate of 0.589 l/min, when the circular flow area was derived from the M-mode echo of the aortic ring.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Calculating cardiac output from transmitral volume flow using Doppler and M-mode echocardiography

To simplify transmitral volume flow determination by Doppler echocardiography, a formula for calculating mean mitral valve orifice area using M-mode echocardiography without any 2-dimensional measurements was developed and evaluated in this study. The maximal mitral orifice area was assumed to be circular and its diameter was calculated from the maximal M-mode mitral leaflet separation. The maximal area was multiplied by the mean to maximal anterior mitral leaflet excursion ratio to correct for phasic changes in flow orifice area during ventricular filling. This measurement had a high correlation (r = 0.97, standard error of the estimate + 0.26 cm2) with mean mitral valve orifice area calculated from frame-by-frame analysis of short-axis 2-dimensional echoes in a select group of 10 normal volunteers and 10 patients with cardiomyopathy who had very high quality images of the mitral valve leaflet tips. Cardiac output calculated using the new method for orifice area estimation combined with apex view mitral valve Doppler velocities was then validated in 48 consecutive patients undergoing thermodilution cardiac output determinations with a close correlation between Doppler and thermodilution cardiac output (2.3 to 6.1 liter/min, r = 0.93, standard error of the estimate = 362 ml). The correlation improved when 12 patients with mild mitral insufficiency were excluded (r = 0.95). The M-mode echocardiogram-derived mitral valve orifice method combined with Doppler mitral valve velocities is accurate, easy to perform, has a high success rate and should increase the applicability of Doppler echocardiography for estimation of cardiac output.     

Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic determination of stroke volume and cardiac output: clinical validation of two new methods using the apical window

Two methods of measuring stroke volume and cardiac output with pulsed Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography were developed and validated against the thermodilution technique in 39 patients, 33 of which were in an intensive care unit. With the use of the apical four-chamber view, a mitral inflow method combined the velocity of left ventricular inflow at the mitral anulus with the cross-sectional area of the anulus calculated from its diameter at middiastole (area = pi r2). From the apical five-chamber view a left ventricular outflow method combined the velocity of left ventricular outflow with the cross-sectional area of the aortic anulus calculated from its diameter during early systole (parasternal long-axis view). Measurements with the mitral inflow and left ventricular outflow methods were obtained in 35 of 39 (90%) and 39 of 39 (100%) patients, respectively. Validation of the mitral method excluded patients with mitral regurgitation (n = 11) and validation of the left ventricular outflow method excluded those with aortic regurgitation (n = 4). Good correlations were observed between thermodilution and Doppler measurements of stroke volume and cardiac output for both the mitral anulus method (R = .96 and .87, respectively) and the left ventricular outflow method (R = .95 and .91, respectively). The results of the two methods correlated well with each other in patients without regurgitant valve lesions. A greater interobserver variability was observed with the mitral anulus method, which was related solely to greater variability in measuring the annular diameter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Transesophageal Doppler echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output using mitral anulus method

The method of measuring cardiac output with transesophageal pulsed Doppler two-dimensional echocardiography was developed and validated by comparison with the thermodilution technique in 65 adult patients. With the use of transesophageal four-chamber view, the Doppler sample volume was placed in the center of the mitral ring and the mitral flow velocity-time integral was obtained through planimetric measurements of the mitral flow velocity curve. The diameter of the mitral valve anulus was measured at the time of peak rapid filling flow velocity, and the cross-sectional area of the mitral valve anulus was calculated, assuming a circular shape. Doppler-determined cardiac output was calculated by using the following formula: Cardiac output [1.min-1] = pi (D [cm] /2)2.MFVI [cm].heart rate [bpm].10(-3), where MFVI is mitral flow velocity-time integral, and D is the diameter of the mitral valve anulus. There was a weak correlation between thermodilution and Doppler measurements of cardiac output (r = 0.64, p less than 0.01), while a good correlation was observed between percent changes in thermodilution-derived cardiac output and those in Doppler-determined cardiac output (r = 0.92, p less than 0.01) during different loading conditions. It has been suggested that this method may be useful for assessing relative changes in cardiac output during short time periods.     

Doppler echocardiographic measurement of mitral flow volume: validation of a new method in adult patients

Instantaneous intracardiac flow volumes can be calculated as the product of instantaneous flow velocity and instantaneous orifice area. This was accounted for in a new method of measuring stroke volume and cardiac output in the mitral orifice by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. This method was compared with simultaneous thermodilution in 30 adult patients in sinus rhythm without substantial atrioventricular or pulmonary valve abnormalities. The mitral orifice was assimilated to a conduit with 1) an ellipse-shaped inlet and outlet, 2) the same (and constant) long axis for the inlet and outlet ellipses (that is, the mediolateral anulus diameter measured on apical four chamber views), and 3) a varying outlet short axis (that is, the mitral anteroposterior leaflet separation derived from left parasternal M-mode recordings). This method design avoided the need for a short-axis view of the whole circumference of the mitral outlet orifice, which is difficult to obtain in many adult patients. The mitral flow velocity was recorded from the apex under two-dimensional guidance, within the mitral canal, close to the outlet section. Integration of instantaneous mitral leaflet separation multiplied by instantaneous flow velocity was performed using Simpson's rule. In addition to the proposed "instantaneous orifice area" method (method A), a "mean orifice area" method (method B) was also compared with thermodilution. In this simplified method, mitral flow was the product of mean orifice area and the diastolic mitral velocity integral, both derived from the same recordings as for method A.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Measurement of left ventricular stroke volume using continuous wave Doppler echocardiography of the ascending aorta and M-mode echocardiography of the aortic valve

A number of reports have described different Doppler echocardiographic methods to calculate left ventricular stroke volume and cardiac output, but the clinical application of the noninvasive measurements of cardiac function remains in the early stages of development. This slow dissemination may be partly explained by the varying success of these ultrasound methods in determining accurate left ventricular stroke volume. The purpose of this study was to improve the simplicity and accuracy of Doppler stroke volume determination so that it could be more easily applied to patient management. Stroke volume was measured using the product of the integral of aortic velocity obtained by continuous wave Doppler technique and the M-mode tracing of the aortic valve, validating the data against cardiac output obtained by thermodilution technique in 41 patients (r = 0.95, SEE = 7 cc). Intra- and interobserver variability was between 9 and 11%. The results of different sampling sites and the temporal relation between Doppler and thermodilution measurements were also studied. Analysis of 21 patients who had M-mode and two-dimensional echocardiographic studies of the aortic root revealed that the method using M-mode measurement of aortic valve area was most accurate in determining left ventricular stroke volume (r = 0.94, SEE = 10 cc), stroke volume being overestimated when area measurements of the ascending aorta were used. In conclusion, maximal ascending aortic velocity determined by continuous wave Doppler echocardiography with M-mode measurement of aortic valve area can be used to calculate left ventricular stroke volume and cardiac output. The simplicity and practicality of this method should enhance the clinical application of Doppler echocardiography as a noninvasive monitoring technique.     

Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography

Laminar flow through a conduit is equal to the mean velocity times the cross-sectional area of the orifice. Therefore, volume is equal to the time-velocity integral multiplied by the cross-sectional area. In aortic stenosis, flow in the stenotic jet is laminar and the aortic valve area should be equal to the volume of blood ejected through the valve divided by the time-velocity integral of the aortic jet velocity recorded by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography. To test whether this concept can be used to accurately determine aortic valve area noninvasively by the Doppler method, 39 patients (age 35 to 82 years, mean 63) underwent pulsed Doppler combined with two-dimensional echocardiography for measurement of stroke volume at the aortic, pulmonic, and mitral anulus as well as continuous-wave Doppler recording of the aortic jet. Aortic valve area determined at cardiac catheterization by the Gorlin equation ranged between 0.4 and 2.07 cm2 (mean 0.89 +/- 0.45). Doppler-derived valve area, determined with the stroke volume value from either the aortic, pulmonic, or mitral anulus, correlated well with the area determined at cardiac catheterization (r = .95, .97, and .96, respectively). A simplified method for measuring aortic valve area derived as the cross-sectional area of the aortic anulus times peak velocity just proximal to the aortic valve divided by peak aortic jet velocity correlated well with measurements obtained at cardiac catheterization (r = .94). An excellent separation between critical and noncritical aortic stenosis was seen using either one of the Doppler methods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Cardiac output estimates in the pediatric intensive care unit using a continuous-wave Doppler computer: validation and limitations of the technique

We compared the cardiac index obtained by means of a continuous-wave Doppler computer with simultaneous thermodilution measurements in 25 children in the pediatric intensive care unit (40 observations). The aortic diameter was measured at various levels to determine which provided the best measure of cardiac index. The Doppler measurements were performed independently by a physician trained in Doppler cardiography and by a nurse with no experience in echocardiography. Both the nurse and physician obtained high-quality flow velocity recordings in all patients in a mean time of 5 minutes or less. Cardiac index and total systemic vascular resistance measured by means of Doppler and thermodilution techniques were highly correlated (r = 0.86 and r = 0.93, respectively). The highest correlation was obtained when Doppler cardiac index was computed by means of the internal diameter measured at the aortic anulus. There was no significant difference between the nurse's and physician's measurements. We conclude that cardiac index can be accurately determined in the pediatric intensive care unit by means of continuous-wave Doppler computer, even when operated by personnel not trained in Doppler cardiography.     

Determination of transmitral blood flow by pulsed echodoppler. Correlation with aortic blood flow in 30 patients

The aim of this study was to assess the validity of mitral valve blood flow measured by pulsed Doppler echocardiography (PDE) with the sample volume positioned at the tips of the mitral leaflets. Thirty patients with a mean age of 38.4 years underwent calculation of transmitral blood flow: by Touche's method (A) in which the mitral orifice is assumed to be an ellipse with a constant long axis equal to the diameter of the mitral annulus and a variable short axis equal to the distance between the mitral leaflets measured on the M mode recording. The velocities are recorded by PDE with the sample volume at the tips of the mitral leaflets. The instantaneous cardiac output is equal to the surface multiplied by the instantaneous velocity. The integration of the instantaneous outputs throughout the whole of diastole by a computer programme provides the stroke volume; by a simplification of this method (B) which considers the short axis of the mitral ellipse to be constant and equal to the mean mitral valve leaflet separation measured from the M mode recording, and; by Hoit's method (C) which calculates mitral valve surface area from the M mode recording alone. The transmitral blood flow was calculated by these three methods and compared to the classical PDE aortic cardiac output measurement during the same examination, the accuracy of which has been previously demonstrated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Determination of cardiac output by Doppler echocardiography: a critical appraisal

Doppler echocardiography enables noninvasive determination of blood velocity and flow area through which quantitation of blood flow in vessels and across valvular orifices can be achieved. The stroke volume is rendered as the product of the flow area and the area beneath the velocity curve; on taking the heart rate into consideration, the cardiac output can be calculated. Essentially, this method can be used in the region of all four cardiac valves, the ascending aorta and the pulmonary artery. For calculation of the mitral and tricuspid velocity, the sample volume is positioned in the region of the tips of the leaflets or in the valve anulus. The flow area is most frequently calculated from the diameter of the valve anulus under the assumption of a circular cross-section. Additionally, in some studies, with respect to correction for area changes during diastole, separation of the leaflets in the M-mode echocardiogram has been employed. Determination of the right ventricular output is accomplished through the combination of the blood flow velocity in the pulmonary artery and the cross-sectional area of this vessel, the right ventricular outflow tract or the pulmonic anulus. To calculate flow in the ascending aorta, both pulsed and continuous-wave Doppler techniques have been employed and the diameter of the ascending aorta or the aortic root is derived echocardiographically. Comparative studies of the various methods show that measurement of flow in the region of the aortic anulus yields results somewhat superior to that of the other methods. Possible sources of error in these methods result from simplifying assumptions with respect to calculation of the area of flow, that is, equating the anatomical area with the area of flow, circular or elliptical cross-sectional models, temporal constancy of the areas as well as the velocities, that is, constant position of the sample volume, flat velocity profile and neglect of angle deviations.     

Two-dimensional mitral flow velocity profiles in pig models using epicardial doppler echocardiography

Objectives. This study investigated the velocity distribution across the natural mitral valve.Background. Information about the blood velocity distribution across the mitral valve is of interest in bask fluid dynamic studies of the natural mitral valve and is needed for precise cardiac output estimatess by Doppler echocardiography.Methods. The velocity distribution across the mitral valve was measured by epicardial Doppler echocardiography in ten 90-kg anesthetised pigs. By routing the ultrasound transducer in 30 ° intervals from the apical position, we constructed two-dimensional velocity profiles across the left ventricular inflow tract from diameters from each rotation arranged around a reference point. The time-averaged mitral velocity profile was calculated to estimate the error in cardiac output calculations that may occur with pulsed Doppler ultrasound when a single sample volume is used to record the mean velocity across the mitral orifice.Results. The time-averaged diastolic cross-sectional mitral velocity profiles at the level of the mitral annulus and leaflet tips were variably skewed because of the development of a large anterior vortex in the left ventricle during the deceleration of early diastolk inflow and atrial systole. The ratio of the time-velocity integral of the center sample volume to the spatially averaged time-velocity integral was 1.13 ± 0.15 (mean ± SD) (range 0.80 to 1.32). Using regression analysis, we found a correlation between the degree of nonuniformity of the cross-sectional velocity distribution and the peak velocity of the anterior vortex (r = 0.65, p < 0.01).Conclusions. The assumption of a flat mean velocity profile across the mitral valve can introduce errors of +13 ± 15% (mean ± SD) in cardiac output measured with pulsed Doppler ultrasound when one is interrogating a single center sample volume.     

Noninvasive determination of stroke volume with impulse Doppler echocardiography: comparison with the Fick method

Pulsed Doppler echocardiographic studies were performed in 14 patients (eleven with mitral valve disease, two with coronary artery disease, one with aortic and mitral valve replacement) for determination of cardiac output and the results compared with those obtained from simultaneous measurements carried out according to the Fick principle. Determination of cardiac output and stroke volume was achieved with a pulsed Doppler instrument specifically designed in our laboratory (repetition frequency 10 kHz, maximal penetrance 7.7 cm, ultrasonic beam diameter 3 cm at a distance of 5 cm from the transducer). Doppler measurements of the instantaneous blood flow velocity in the ascending aorta were obtained with the transducer in a suprasternal position. Through integration of the mean spatial velocity over an entire cardiac cycle, the distance traversed by the blood during one heart beat was obtained and then multiplied by the echocardiographically-determined cross-section area of the aorta and the heart rate to yield the cardiac output. There was a statistically-significant linear correlation between the cardiac output determined by Doppler (CO-D) and Fick (CO-F): CO-D = 0.92 CO-F X 0.48, r = 0.85, n = 14. The mean values for the two methods were 3.89 and 3.68 1/min, respectively. The correlation between the two methods improved if only those patients with sinus rhythm were taken into consideration (CO-D = 1.05 CO-F - 0.21, r = 0.93, n = 11). The results show that the pulsed Doppler method used enables accurate determination of cardiac output. The method can be carried out in all patients without aortic stenosis.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The mitral valve orifice method for noninvasive two-dimensional echo Doppler determinations of cardiac output

We developed and validated a mitral valve orifice method for Doppler cardiac output determination. In 15 open-chest dogs, cardiac output was controlled and measured by a roller pump interposed between the right atrium and pulmonary artery as a right-heart bypass. Left heart flows were measured in the open-chest dog model by Doppler measurements at the mitral valve orifice and compared not only to volume flow measured by the roller pump, but to electromagnetic flow meters as well. The maximum mitral valve orifice area was measured off short-axis two-dimensional echocardiographic views by planimetry. The maximal orifice was then adjusted for its diastolic variation in size by calculating a ratio of mean-to-maximal mitral valve separation on a derived M-mode echocardiogram. Flow was sampled parallel to mitral valve inflow in a four-chamber plane. The multiplication of mean flow throughout the cardiac cycle by the mean mitral valve area after correction for diastolic size variation yielded a cardiac output determination that could be compared to the roller pump measurement. Fifty-two cardiac output determinations over roller pump values of 1-5 l/min yielded a high correlation between roller pump flows and Doppler (r = 0.97 +/- 0.23 l/min). Our study shows that the mitral valve orifice provides an accurate site for Doppler cardiac output measurements.     

Noninvasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery using a new continuous-wave Doppler esophageal probe

The ability of a new continuous-wave Doppler esophageal probe to measure cardiac output noninvasively during surgery under general anesthesia was tested and compared with simultaneously measured thermodilution cardiac output. A Doppler computer, calibrated for the aortic diameter and the transcutaneously measured cardiac output from the suprasternal notch, computed the Doppler cardiac output from the descending aortic blood flow velocity signal. A total of 246 paired Doppler cardiac output and thermodilution cardiac output measurements were made in 14 patients during surgery. The average thermodilution cardiac output was 5.90 +/- 3.27 (standard deviation) liters/min (range 1.20 to 19.18); the average Doppler cardiac output was 6.21 +/- 4.0 liters/min (range 2.30 to 28.20). The difference between the cardiac output measured by the 2 techniques was 1.38 +/- 2.2 liters/min (range 0.04 to 16.8). Two to 5 cardiac output measurements were averaged and arranged into "time periods." The average standard deviations for thermodilution and Doppler cardiac outputs within each time period were 0.64 and 0.47 liters/min, respectively. There was a correlation between the 2 measurements over a range of cardiac output values (r = 0.76, Doppler cardiac output = 0.93 x thermodilution cardiac output +0.7, standard error of the estimate = 1.76). Reproducible measurements of Doppler cardiac output were obtained during intraobserver (mean difference 0.64 +/- 0.52 liter/min) and interobserver (mean difference 0.41 +/- 0.36 liter/min) studies (n = 8). Cardiac output measurement by the Doppler esophageal probe could be used for hemodynamic monitoring during surgery in selected patients with cardiopulmonary disease.     

Determination of cardiac output by single gated pulsed Doppler echocardiography

The aim of the study was to evaluate the use of single gated pulsed Doppler cross-sectional echocardiography for measurement of the cardiac output. Pulsed Doppler echocardiography was used to assess both area and blood velocity at the aortic orifice. Stroke volume estimates were determined by multiplying area by systolic time velocity integral as measured from the parasternal and apical approach, respectively. We investigated a group of 17 healthy individuals and a group of 20 patients with coronary artery disease. In the first group no change was found in aortic area during systole (P less than 0.01). During a follow-up of two weeks no change in aortic area was observed either (P less than 0.01). Intraobserver, interobserver and day-to-day variability of the aortic area, expressed as the coefficient of variation was 3.6 +- 5.2%, 4.6 +- 5.7% and 7.8 +- 3.8% (mean +- 1 SD), respectively. The interobserver variability of the time velocity integrals was 6.0 +- 6.2%. In the second group the cardiac output as measured with the thermodilution method ranged from 3.8 to 8.0 l/min. Comparison of the Doppler and thermodilution technique for measurement of cardiac output showed a correlation coefficient of r = 0.76 (P less than 0.001) and the following regression equation: CO (Doppler) = 1.0 x CO (thermodilution)-700 ml. The Doppler method underestimated cardiac output relative to the thermodilution method.     

Variable effects of changes in flow rate through the aortic, pulmonary and mitral valves on valve area and flow velocity: impact on quantitative Doppler flow calculations

Doppler echocardiographic methods for measuring volumetric flow through the aortic, pulmonary and mitral valves provide the cardiologist with several potentially interchangeable noninvasive methods for determining cardiac output. In addition, comparison of flow differences through individual valves offers the potential to quantitate shunt flow and regurgitant volumes. To date, however, no study has compared the relative accuracies of each of these flow measurements in a controlled experimental setting. Therefore, in this study, Doppler echocardiography was used to measure aortic, pulmonary and mitral valve flows in seven open chest dogs on right atrial bypass where forward cardiac output was precisely controlled with a roller pump. Correlations with roller pump output were better for Doppler measurements of aortic (r = 0.98, SD = 0.3) and mitral (r = 0.97, SD = 0.3) than for pulmonary (r = 0.93, SD = 0.5) valve flow. Interobserver reproducibility was also better for aortic (r = 0.94) and mitral (r = 0.97) than for pulmonary (r = 0.88) valve flow measurements. All valves showed flow-related increases in cross-sectional area, but the slope of this response was variable: 0.05, 0.16 and 0.21 for the aortic, the pulmonary and the mitral valve, respectively. Increased forward flow through the aortic valve, therefore, was manifested primarily by an increase in velocity, whereas increasing flow through the pulmonary and mitral valves produced more significant area changes with correspondingly smaller increases in the velocity component. Recalculation of Doppler-determined outputs, assuming a fixed valve area for the entire range of flows, resulted in a decreased correlation with roller pump output. Both velocity and valve area should be measured at each flow rate for greatest accuracy in volumetric flow calculations.     

Intraoperative determination of cardiac output by transesophageal continuous wave Doppler.

A new prototype transesophageal transducer with continuous-wave Doppler and pulsed Doppler capabilities was evaluated to calculate intraoperative cardiac output from the main pulmonary artery. Fifteen consecutive patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass surgery were studied. The main pulmonary artery diameter above the pulmonic valve was measured with the single horizontal plane transesophageal transducer. The pulmonary artery cross-sectional area was calculated from its diameter using the formula: Area = 1/4 pi (diameter)2. Continuous-wave Doppler and pulsed Doppler spectra were recorded from the main pulmonary artery and their flow velocity integrals were then multiplied by pulmonary artery area and heart rate to yield cardiac output. The main pulmonary artery diameter could not be confidently measured in 2 of 15 patients (13%). In the remaining 13 patients, Doppler cardiac output measurements were correlated with simultaneous thermodilution measurements. The closest correlation with thermodilution cardiac output was with the continuous-wave Doppler cardiac output method: R = 0.91, SEE = 0.2 L/min, and y = 1.1x . 0.2 (p less than 0.001). The correlation of thermodilution with pulsed Doppler cardiac output was R = 0.83, SEE = 0.5 L/min, and and y = 0.86 + 1.0 (p less than 0.001). Transesophageal continuous-wave Doppler is a new technique that may be used in selected patients for accurate determination of intraoperative cardiac output.     

Pulsed Doppler ultrasound compared with thermodilution for monitoring cardiac output responses to changing left ventricular function

To determine the responsiveness of the pulsed Doppler technique to pacing and drug induced changes in left ventricular function 125 simultaneous cardiac output measurements by pulsed Doppler ultrasound and thermodilution were compared in 12 patients. The Doppler velocity frequencies were analysed using a signal averaging process and the validity of this method first tested in vitro. This showed almost perfect linearity of pulsed Doppler and electromagnetic flow determinations in a test rig. Although data points showed greater scatter in the clinical study, a highly significant linear relation between cardiac output measurements by pulsed Doppler and thermodilution was confirmed by regression analysis (r = 0.88, p less than 0.001). Certain mean values for cardiac output by the two techniques differed, however, by up to 0.9 litre.min-1. Despite this, changes in cardiac output in response to pacing, inotropic stimulation with dobutamine, and vasodilatation with nitrates were directionally similar, indicating a useful role for the pulsed Doppler technique in monitoring responses to treatment in the intensive care unit. Pulsed Doppler also provided a simple measure of left ventricular contractile function. Thus the inotropic response to dobutamine produced a significant rise in peak aortic flow velocity, and this variable was unaffected by either pacing or nitrate induced vasodilatation.     

Comparative accuracy of Doppler echocardiographic methods for clinical stroke volume determination

Numerous Doppler echocardiographic methods to measure stroke volume have been proposed in experimental or clinical studies, but their relative accuracy in patients compared with an invasive reference standard remains uncertain. Accordingly, we compared Doppler with thermodilution stroke volume measurement in 18 hospitalized patients, 16 with an acute manifestation of coronary artery disease and two with chronic cardiomyopathies. Doppler time-velocity integrals were measured by darkest line (modal velocity) and the leading edge (maximal velocity) techniques at the aortic annular plane, the mitral orifice, and the mitral annular plane. Two-dimensional echocardiography was used to measure cross-sectional areas (M-mode-corrected at the mitral orifice). The combination of aortic annular cross-sectional area and the leading edge technique of measuring the time-velocity integral of blood flow at this site provided the most accurate measure of stroke volume (r = 0.87, p less than 0.0001, standard error of estimate = 11 cm3; mean difference from thermodilution = 2.8 ml +/- 8.9 ml, p = NS). It also resulted in the most accurate measurement of cardiac output (r = 0.88, p less than 0.0003; mean difference from thermodilution = 0.11 L/min +/- 0.69 L/min, p = NS). Other methods yielded values that correlated less closely and deviated systematically from thermodilution measurements. We therefore conclude that of the six common methods evaluated, the aortic annular leading edge method measures stroke volume with the best accuracy and is most suitable for clinical application.     

Superiority of two-dimensional measurement of aortic vessel diameter in Doppler echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular stroke volume

Attempts to measure left ventricular stroke volume utilizing the Doppler aortic flow method have found varying correlations between invasive thermodilution and non-invasive Doppler methods. Because stroke volume is the product of the Doppler flow velocity integral (that is, the area under the flow velocity curve) and the cross-sectional area of the vessel through which blood flows, both variables are potential sources of error. Previous studies have shown that the Doppler flow velocity integral can be measured with acceptable reproducibility in the ascending aorta. Consequently, in this study an attempt was made to determine empirically the optimal method for measuring aortic diameter and area. The diameter of the ascending aorta was measured utilizing four M-mode and seven two-dimensional echocardiographic conventions. Doppler aortic flow velocity patterns were recorded with a 2.25 MHz M-mode echocardiographic transducer from the suprasternal notch by mapping the ascending aorta until aortic peak flow velocity was recorded. In 19 adult patients undergoing cardiac catheterization for clinical indications, Doppler stroke volume estimates utilizing the various echocardiographic conventions for measuring aortic root diameter and area were compared with simultaneous measurements of stroke volume by the thermodilution technique. The best correlation (r = 0.87) with thermodilution stroke volume was obtained by estimating aortic area from the two-dimensional parasternal long-axis images with the aortic dimension measured distal to the aortic sinuses from the inner to inner wall. The data were related by the equation: Thermodilution stroke volume = (0.73) X (two-dimensional Doppler stroke volume) + 17 cc.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)