New paradigms for therapy for osteosarcoma

Osteosarcoma is a primary bone malignancy generally affecting the young, with 60% of cases occurring before the age of 25 years and the peak incidence at 15 years. Survival has improved over the past several decades, with nonmetastatic disease having an approximately 70% chance of long-term survival. Unfortunately, patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis or those who have recurrent disease have a dismal prognosis, with approximately 20% surviving long term. In this review article we describe several new therapies in development for osteosarcoma. These include immune-based therapies, strategies to inhibit tumor growth, radiotherapy, and the introduction of new chemotherapies and targets.     

Technique for external beam treatment for mesothelioma

A combined photon-electron beam treatment for diffuse pleural mesothelioma is discussed in this paper. The technique consists of parallel opposed 10 MV X rays prescribed to 4250 cGy using customized blocks to shield the lung. The pleura is then boosted with electrons to a dose of 3600 cGy. The combination yields a TDF of 74 ret to the pleura. As discussed in an earlier paper, this treatment method when combined with subtotal pleurectomy and I-125 implantation leads to improved survivals with minimal complications. The details of this 3-dimensional radiation treatment method were not described in detail. To improve target coverage and local control, the technique has been modified. CT is now used along with simulation plane films to define the entire pleural surface. The target volume has also been extended from the dome to the base of this diaphragm. These changes have led to improved pleural dose distributions; by blocking the liver or stomach, and boosting the crus of the diaphragm with electrons, there is little added morbidity. As is demonstrated by dose volume histograms, we have been able to deliver 4250 cGy +/- 10% to most of the pleura with 1/3 of the lung parenchyma receiving less than 2100 cGy.     

Industry gains incentives for drugs for children

Under the FDA Safety and Innovation Act, manufacturers who get a drug for a rare pediatric disease approved and on the market earn a voucher requiring the FDA to review a second drug within 6 months of submission of an application for its approval.     

A framework for rehabilitation for cancer survivors

This paper introduces a theoretical framework that recognises the rehabilitation needs of people who have cancer and offers a multi‐tiered model to meet these needs. Various models for providing survivorship care have been previously proposed, giving rise to multiple possible delivery systems. Existing cancer rehabilitation frameworks recognise different phases of illness, goals of care and the need for services at all stages of illness. The ‘Stained Glass Cancer Rehabilitation Framework’ incorporates survivor needs and rehabilitation modalities, arranged in a practical hierarchy and builds on earlier models. A broad view of rehabilitation services considers complexity, temporal and geographic factors. Recognition that needs emerge over time demands a routine long‐term approach to screening for physical, functional and psychosocial rehabilitation needs by medical and other health professionals. New methods of care delivery and coordination from specialist to primary care settings are needed, long after treatment is completed. Service delivery infrastructure supported by funding reform and training of rehabilitation professionals in delivering appropriate interventions for cancer survivors is essential, together with more research into cancer rehabilitation interventions, functional outcomes and their delivery.     

Radiometals as payloads for radioimmunotherapy for lymphoma

Because of their remarkable effectiveness in radioimmunotherapy (RIT), 2 anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (MAb) drugs, one labeled with indium 111 for imaging or yttrium 90 for therapy, and another labeled with iodine I 131 for imaging and therapy, have been approved for use in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Successful RIT for lymphomas is due in large part to the rapid and efficient binding of the targeted MAb to lymphoma cells. Carcinomas are more difficult to access, necessitating novel strategies matched with radionuclides with specific physical properties. Because there are many radionuclides from which to choose, a systematic approach is required to select those preferred for a specific application. Thus far, radionuclides with g emissions for imaging and particulate emissions for therapy have been investigated. Radionuclides of iodine were the first to be used for RIT. Many conventionally radioiodinated MAbs are degraded after endocytosis by target cells, releasing radioiodinated peptides and amino acids. In contrast, radiometals have been shown to have residualizing properties, advantageous when the MAb is localized in malignant tissue. b-emitting lanthanides like those of 90Y, lutetium 177, etc. have attractive combinations of biologic, physical, radiochemical, production, economic, and radiation safety characteristics. Other radiometals, such as copper-67 and copper-64, are also of interest. a-emitters, including actinium-225 and bismuth-213, have been used for therapy in selected applications. Evidence for the impact of the radionuclide is provided by data from the randomized pivotal phase III trial of 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) in patients with NHL; responses were about 2 times greater in the 90Y ibritumomab tiuxetan arm than in the rituximab arm. It is clear that RIT has emerged as a safe and efficient method for treatment of NHL, especially in specific settings.     

Criteria for the selection of radionuclides for targeting nuclear antigens for cancer radioimmunotherapy

The potential of utilizing immunoconjugates to selectively deliver radionuclides for the destruction of tumors has stimulated much research activity. From dosimetric and other considerations, the choice of radiolabel is an important factor that needs to be optimized for maximum effectiveness of radioimmunotherapy (RIT). This paper reviews and assesses a number of present and future radionuclides that are particularly suitable for RIT based on the various physical, chemical, and biological considerations. Although intermediate to high-energy beta emitters (with and without gamma photons in their emission) possess a number of advantages for most RIT, the use of alpha, Auger, and short range conversion electron emitters could be attractive for targeting nuclear antigens when the radioimmunoconjugate is internalized into tumor cells. Factors relating to the production and availability of candidate radionuclides as well as their stable chemical attachment to monoclonal antibodies are discussed.     

Gangliosides as targets for immunotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma cells express gangliosides and sialyl Lewis (sLe) antigens. It is not known whether these carbohydrate antigens can be targeted by immunotherapy. The authors measured the expression of GM(2) and sLe antigens on the surface of pancreatic carcinoma cells and the serum levels of total gangliosides, GM(2), and antiganglioside antibodies in patients with pancreatic carcinoma. METHODS: Cell surface GM(2) and sLe antigens were measured by cell suspension enzyme linked immunoadsorbent assay (ELISA) in four pancreatic carcinoma cell lines. Sera from 20 pancreatic carcinoma patients and 20 age- and gender-matched healthy volunteers were analyzed for antiganglioside and anti-sLe immunoglobulin (Ig) M titers by ELISA. Serum levels of total gangliosides and GM(2) also were measured. RESULTS: All cell lines expressed GM(2) and sLe antigens. When compared with age- and gender-matched volunteers, patients had significantly higher serum levels of total gangliosides (25.6 +/- 9.0 mg/dL vs. 15.6 +/- 2.7 mg/dL; P < 0.001), GM(2) (0.278 +/- 0.415 mg/dL vs. 0.013 +/- 0.018 mg/dL; P = 0.02), ELISA units of anti-GM(2) IgM antibody (368 +/- 95 vs. 155 +/- 25; P = 0.04) and anti-GD(1b) IgM antibody (351 +/- 91 vs. 138 +/- 26; P = 0.03), but not anti-sLe(x) IgM (1389 +/- 345 vs. 1081 +/- 224; P = 0.46) or anti-sLe(a) IgM antibody (1097 +/- 253 vs. 1200 +/- 315; P = 0.80). Patients with unresectable tumors had higher serum levels of total gangliosides compared with patients with resectable tumors, and a serum level > 25 mg/dL was found to correlate significantly with poor overall survival (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Increased serum levels of total gangliosides and GM(2) may reflect shedding or release of gangliosides from the surface of tumor cells. Production of IgM antibody against GM(2) and GD(1b) indicates that these gangliosides are immunogenic antigens that may be potential targets for effective active immunotherapy.     

Follow-up for women after treatment for cervical cancer

Question

What is the most appropriate follow-up strategy for patients with cervical cancer who are clinically disease-free after receiving primary treatment?

Perspectives

For women with cervical cancer who have been treated with curative intent, follow-up includes identification of complications related to treatment and intervention in the event of recurrent disease. Most women who recur with cervical cancer are not curable; however, early identification of recurrence can alter disease management or treatment-planning options, and for those with a central pelvic recurrence and no evidence of distant disease, there is a potential for cure with additional therapy. Follow-up protocols in this population are variable, using a number of tests at a variety of intervals with questionable outcomes.

Outcomes

Outcomes of interest included recurrence, survival, and quality of life.

Methodology

The Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group (dsg) conducted a systematic review of the literature and a narrative review of emerging clinical issues to inform the most appropriate follow-up strategy for patients with cervical cancer. The evidence was insufficient to specify a clinically useful recommended follow-up schedule, and therefore, the expert consensus opinion of the Gynecology Cancer dsg was used to develop recommendations on patient surveillance. The resulting recommendations were reviewed and approved by the Gynecology Cancer dsg and by the Program in Evidence-Based Care Report Approval Panel. An external review by Ontario practitioners completed the final phase of the review process. Feedback from all parties was incorporated to create the final practice guideline.

Results

The systematic review of the literature identified seventeen retrospective studies. The Gynecology Cancer dsg used a consensus process to develop recommendations based on the available evidence from the systematic review, the narrative review, and the collective clinical experience and judgment of the dsg members.

Practice Guideline

The recommendations in this practice guideline are based on the expert consensus opinion of the Gynecology Cancer dsg, informed by evidence from retrospective studies. These are some general features of an appropriate follow-up strategy:

1. At a minimum, follow-up visits with a complete physical examination, including a pelvic–rectal exam and a patient history, should be conducted by a physician experienced in the surveillance of cancer patients.
2. There is little evidence to suggest that vaginal vault cytology adds significantly to the clinical exam in detecting early disease recurrence.
3. Routine use of various other radiologic or biologic follow-up investigations in asymptomatic patients is not advocated, because the role of those investigations has yet to be evaluated in a definitive manner.
4. A reasonable follow-up schedule involves follow-up visits every 3–4 months in the first 2 years and every 6–12 months in years 3–5. Patients should return to annual population-based general physical and pelvic examinations after 5 years of recurrence-free follow-up.

     

The case for population-based screening for colorectal cancer

Screening for colorectal cancer is commanding increasing attention. Other cancer screening programmes have been a part of public consciousness for some time, but, until recently, colorectal cancer screening has remained in the background. Fuelled by new research, market opportunities and increased recognition of individual risk, screening for colorectal cancer is becoming a recommended procedure, but controversy about how best to implement widespread screening remains.