Incidence,Clinical Features,and Outcomes of Langerhans Cell Sarcoma in the United States

BackgroundLimited knowledge exists on the incidence, treatment patterns, and long-term outcomes of Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS) in the United States.Patients and MethodsWe performed a retrospective study of LCS patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2014 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) and National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) databases. Incidence was calculated from SEER, and treatment patterns and outcomes were calculated from NCDB.ResultsA total of 25 and 52 cases of LCS were reported to SEER and NCDB, respectively. The overall incidence of the disease was 0.2 per 10,000,000 and did not differ by race (P = .56) or sex (P = .33). The median age at diagnosis was 62 (range, 19-90) years. Of the 52 patients from NCDB, 20 (39%) received chemotherapy as first-line therapy, 24 (46%) received surgery, and 15 (29%) received radiotherapy. The 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 62%, and the median OS was 19 months. After censoring the patients with bone marrow and reticuloendothelial system involvement, no significant difference in OS was noted between the patients who were managed with or without surgery (P = .75). Postsurgical radiation or chemotherapy were not associated with improvement in median OS (P = .25). Patients who were managed with radiotherapy had a better OS compared to those who received no radiotherapy (P = .03).ConclusionThis dual-national registry study shows that LCS is extremely rare and has a poor prognosis. Radiotherapy may offer a survival advantage to patients with locoregional disease without bone marrow and reticuloendothelial system involvement.     

Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Prostate: Report of Outcomes of Localized Disease Using the National Cancer Database

BackgroundSmall-cell carcinoma of the prostate (SCCP) is a rare but aggressive prostate cancer histology. We studied the reported comparative outcomes of the efficacy of radiotherapy (RT) versus surgery for nonmetastatic SCCP.MethodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for nonmetastatic disease diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 as SCCP (defined as having a component of SCCP) receiving a single definitive local control modality (RT or surgery).ResultsA total of 243 patients were included (177 RT and 66 surgery). A total of 142 patients received chemotherapy (CHT). Mean age was 68 years. One hundred forty patients had adenocarcinoma concurrently with the SCCP while 103 patients had pure histology. For pure histology, multivariable analysis (MVA) showed nonacademic facility, stage 4 disease, and poorly differentiated grade were associated with worse survival. On MVA, receipt of CHT (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.84, P = .644) or receipt of androgen deprivation therapy (HR = 0.88, P = .715) did not affect overall survival. Receipt of RT was nonsignificant compared to surgery (HR = 0.75, P = .475). For mixed histology, MVA showed receipt of CHT and prostate-specific antigen > 20 ng/mL were associated with worse survival. Receipt of androgen deprivation therapy (HR = 1.35, P = .414) did not affect overall survival. Receipt of RT was also nonsignificant compared to surgery (HR = 1.42, P = .344).ConclusionRT and surgery for nonmetastatic SCCP yield comparable options as local therapies.     

The Role of Radiation in All Stages of Nodular Lymphocytic Predominant Hodgkin Lymphoma

BackgroundThe goal of this study was to assess the survival differences seen in early-stage and advanced-stage nodular lymphocytic predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) based on treatment modality.Patients and MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients diagnosed with NLPHL between 2004 and 2012. Overall survival (OS) was determined using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were used to estimate differences in OS between treatment groups.ResultsA total of 1968 patients were identified for analysis, consisting of stage I (40.4%), stage II (29.3%), stage III (22.3%), and stage IV (8.0%) disease. The median age of patients was 46 years. The following factors were predictive of radiotherapy (RT) omission in treatment: increasing age, black race, Medicare insurance, chemotherapy use, stage II to IV disease, and the presence of B-symptoms. On survival analysis, RT was associated with prolonged OS in all stages of NLPHL (50.1 vs. 42.4 months; P < .01). The OS benefit of RT persisted on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio, 0.37; P < .01). On subset analysis, RT was associated with prolonged OS in early disease (49.8 vs. 45.5 months; P < .01), whereas a trend towards an OS benefit was observed in advanced-stage (54.1 vs. 39.6 months; P = .06) NLPHL. Radiotherapy was also associated with prolonged OS among patients with B-symptoms (49.0 vs. 42.6 months; P < .01).ConclusionThe use of RT in NLPHL is less likely among those with advanced-stage disease and B-symptoms. However, we found RT to be associated with prolonged OS in all stages of NLPHL, including those with B-symptoms.     

Does Prophylactic Paraortic Lymph Node Irradiation Improve Outcomes in Women With Stage IIIC1 Endometrial Carcinoma?

PurposeTo evaluate the impact of prophylactic paraortic lymph node (PALN) radiation therapy (RT) on clinical outcomes in patients with International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2018 stage IIIC1 endometrial cancer (EC).Methods and MaterialsA multi-institutional retrospective study included patients with International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2018 stage IIIC1 EC lymph node assessment, status postsurgical staging, followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and RT using various sequencing regimens. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable analysis were performed by Cox proportional hazard models for RFS/OS. In addition, propensity score matching was used to estimate the effect of the radiation field extent on survival outcomes.ResultsA total of 378 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 45.8 months. Pelvic RT was delivered to 286 patients, and 92 patients received pelvic and PALN RT. The estimated OS and RFS rates at 5 years for the entire cohort were 80% and 69%, respectively. There was no difference in the 5-year OS (77% vs 87%, P = .47) and RFS rates (67% vs 70%, P = .78) between patients treated with pelvic RT and those treated with pelvic and prophylactic PALN RT, respectively. After propensity score matching, the estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of prophylactic PALN RT versus pelvic RT were 1.50 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-3.19; P = .28) for OS and 1.24 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-2.42; P = .51) for RFS, suggesting that prophylactic PALN RT does not improve survival outcomes. Distant recurrence was the most common site of first recurrence, and the extent of RT field was not associated with the site of first recurrence (P = .79).ConclusionsProphylactic PALN RT was not significantly associated with improved survival outcomes in stage IIIC1 EC. Distant metastasis remains the most common site of failure despite routine use of systemic chemotherapy. New therapeutic approaches are necessary to optimize the outcomes for women with stage IIIC1 EC.     

Skin toxicities associated with tumor treating fields: case based review

To investigate the utilization and overall survival (OS) impact of concurrent chemotherapy in combination with radiation therapy (RT) for elderly glioblastoma (GBM) patients. Elderly patients (age >70) with supratentorial and nonmetastatic GBM who received RT of 20–75 Gy with concurrent single-agent chemotherapy (ChemoRT) or without (RT alone) during 2004–2012 were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). The Cochran-Armitage test was used for trend analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined using Cox proportional hazards. Propensity score analysis was performed to reduce selection bias in treatment allocation. A total of 5252 patients were identified (RT alone: n?=?1389; ChemoRT: n?=?3863). There was increasing utilization of chemotherapy during this period (45–80%, P?<?.001). A similar trend was also observed for the subset of age >80 (25–68%, P?<?.001). ChemoRT was associated with significantly better OS than RT alone (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.70–0.89, P?<?.001) on multivariate analysis, and similar OS benefit was demonstrated with 1202 pairs of propensity-matched patients (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.73–0.86, P?<?.001). For the matched pair, the median OS was 5.8 months with ChemoRT and 5.0 months with RT alone; the 2-year OS rate was 9% with ChemoRT and 4% with RT alone (P?<?.001). Concurrent chemotherapy has been administered with RT for the majority of elderly GBM patients. Addition of chemotherapy to RT for elderly GBM patients is associated with significantly improve OS in routine clinical practice.     

Predictors of Outcomes and a Scoring System for Estimating Survival in Patients Treated With Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression From Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PurposeTo identify prognostic factors and create a survival score to facilitate individualized care of patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) from small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).Patients and MethodsRadiation regimen plus 9 factors were retrospectively evaluated in 120 patients irradiated for MSCC from SCLC for overall response, improvement of motor deficits, postradiotherapy ambulatory status, local control of MSCC, and overall survival (OS). Factors included age, interval diagnosis of SCLC to radiotherapy (RT) of MSCC, visceral metastases, further bone metastases, gender, time developing motor deficits, pre-RT ambulatory status, number of affected vertebrae, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS).ResultsImprovement of motor deficits showed significant associations with ECOG PS 1-2 (P = .018); time developing motor deficits achieved borderline significance (P = .059). Post-RT ambulatory status was significantly associated with slower development of motor dysfunction (P = .003), ambulatory status (P < .001), and ECOG PS 1-2 (P < .001). No factor was significantly associated with overall response and local control. On multivariate analysis, OS was significantly associated with interval from SCLC diagnosis to RT of MSCC (P = .004), visceral metastases (P < .001), ambulatory status (P = .002), and ECOG PS (P = .002). For the survival score, 6-month OS rates related to each of these factors were divided by 10. Patient scores were obtained by adding these factors' scores. Three groups were defined (5, 7-13, and 15-17 points) with 6-month OS rates of 0, 18%, and 77%, respectively (P < .001).ConclusionPredictors of various outcomes were identified and a survival score was created that can support physicians aiming to create personalized treatments to patients with MSCC from SCLC.     

Characteristics and Outcome of Extranodal NK/T-cell Lymphoma in North America: A Retrospective Multi-Institutional Experience

BackgroundExtranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma (ENKTL) is rare and clinical data from non-Asian countries are lacking. It is unclear whether outcomes and disease natural history is similar to reported Asian series. We assessed characteristics and outcomes of patients with ENKTL from major North American centers.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively identified patients with newly-diagnosed CD56 + ENKTL and studied disease characteristics and clinical outcomes.ResultsOne hundred and twenty-one patients with ENKTL diagnosed between June 1990 and November 2012 were identified. Eighty-three patients (69%) had stage I/II disease and were treated with combined modality therapy (CMT) (n = 53), chemotherapy alone (CT) (n = 14) or radiotherapy alone (RT) (n = 16).  Thirty-eight patients (31%) had stage III/IV disease and were treated with CMT (n = 12), CT (n = 23), or RT (n = 3).  The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 51 months. Patients with stage I/II disease, compared to those with stage III/IV disease, had superior 2-year progression free survival (PFS) 43% vs 19% (P = .03) and overall survival (OS) 59% vs. 29% (P= .004). Outcomes were similar for stage I/II patients who received CMT vs. RT alone with 2-year PFS (53% vs. 47%; P= .91) and OS (67% vs. 67%; P= .58). No significant differences in outcomes were noted based on race/ethnicity.ConclusionsThis series represents a large experience of ENKTL treated at several major North American academic centers.  Our data are consistent with Asian studies: (1) majority of patients present with early-stage disease; (2) overall poor outcome regardless of race/ethnicity; (3) CMT likely yields favorable outcomes for suitable candidates with early-stage disease.     

Association of Surgical Approach With Treatment Burden,Oncological Effectiveness,and Perioperative Morbidity in Adrenocortical Carcinoma

MicroabstractIn the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients treated with minimally invasive adrenalectomy (MIA) for adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) had similar oncological outcomes and cumulative treatment burden with less morbidity compared with open adrenalectomy (OA). Although OA remains the standard of care for adrenal lesions concerninge for malignancy, MIA in appropriately selected patients may offer equivalent oncological outcomes.Introduction/BackgroundWe investigated the cumulative treatment burden, oncological effectiveness, and perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing MIA compared with (OA) for patients with ACC.Patients and MethodsWe reviewed the NCDB for patients undergoing surgical resection (MIA vs. OA) for ACC from 2010 to 2017. Inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression, negative binomial, and Cox proportional hazards models were fit to assess for an association of surgical approach with cumulative treatment burden (any adjuvant therapy, radiation therapy [RT], and systemic therapy), oncological effectiveness (positive surgical margins [PSM], lymph node yield [LNY], and overall survival [OS]), and perioperative morbidity (length of stay [LOS] and readmission) as appropriate.ResultsWe identified 776 patients that underwent adrenalectomy for ACC, of which 307 underwent MIA. We noted patients with larger tumors (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.86, P < .001) were less likely to have MIA prior to IPTW. We did not appreciate a significant association of MIA with cumulative treatment burden or the use of any adjuvant therapy (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.60-1.21, P = .375), adjuvant RT (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.59-1.50, P = .801), or adjuvant systemic therapy (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.58-1.21, P = .352). Patients undergoing MIA had similar oncological effectiveness of surgery and OS when compared with patients which underwent OA. Patients that underwent MIA had a significantly shorter LOS (IRR: 0.74, 95% CI 0.62-0.88, P = .001) and lower odds of readmission (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23-0.91, P = .026).ConclusionsAlthough the standard of care for adrenal lesions suspicious for ACC remains OA, in appropriately selected patients, MIA may offer similar oncological effectiveness and cumulative treatment burden, with less morbidity, than OA.     

Outcomes for Young Men With Localized Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of the NCDB

BackgroundPrimary management of localized, intermediate-risk prostate cancer consists of radical prostatectomy (RP), radiotherapy (RT) with short-course androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), or RT alone. The purpose of this study was to determine if these treatment strategies have equivalent overall survival (OS) in patients < 55 years old with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.Patients and MethodsWe identified 35,134 patients in the National Cancer Data Base with localized intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with RP, RT + ADT, or RT from 2004 to 2013. Ten-year OS rates were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were computed by multivariate Cox regression.ResultsA total of 29,920 patients (85.2%) underwent RP, 1393 (4.0%) RT + ADT, and 3821 (10.9%) RT. Median patient age was 51 years old, and median follow-up was 59.9 months. Ten-year OS was estimated to be 94.2% for RP, 80.7% for RT + ADT, and 85.2% for RT (P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, treatment with RT + ADT or RT was associated with significantly worse OS compared to treatment with RP (RT + ADT HR = 2.06, 95% CI 1.67-2.54, P < .0001; RT HR = 2.0, 95% CI 1.71-2.33, P < .0001). Patients who met all 3 of the intermediate-risk criteria showed worse OS compared to patients who met only one criterion (HR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.32-2.44; P = .0002).ConclusionRP is significantly more likely than RT + ADT or RT to be used as a primary treatment for young men with localized intermediate prostate cancer. RP was also associated with improved OS compared to RT + ADT and RT.     

Early venous thromboembolic events are associated with worse prognosis in patients with lung cancer

ObjectivesVenous thromboembolic events (VTE) are a leading cause of death in cancer patients. We hypothesized that early VTE (EVTE, within 3 months of diagnosis) in patients with lung cancer (LC) are associated with worse overall survival (OS).Materials and methodsWe identified 727 patients with LC between 1998 and 2011. Late VTE (LVTE) were defined as VTE occurring after 3 months from LC diagnosis. Advance disease (AD) was defined as patients with Stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or extensive stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and non-advanced disease (non-AD) was defined as ≤Stage III NSCLC or limited stage SCLC.ResultsOut of 727 patients included in our review, 617 patients had NSCLC (85%), 94 (13%) SCLC, and 16 (2%) low grade neuroendocrine tumors. Ninety five patients (13%) experienced VTE, 44 (6%) experienced an EVTE and 49 (7%) had a LVTE. Patients with an EVTE had worse OS when compared to all other patients (medians 4 vs. 17 months, p < 0.0001). EVTE were associated with worse OS in patients with non-AD (medians 12 vs. 42 months, p = 0.01) and AD (medians 4 vs. 6 months, p = 0.02). When considering patients with NSCLC only, in a multivariate model that included age, stage, performance status >2, administration of chemotherapy and Charlson comorbidity index, EVTE were an independent predictor of increased mortality (HR 2.4; 95% CI 1.6–3.3).ConclusionsEVTE are associated with worse OS, irrespective of stage of the disease. Our findings underscore the need for an efficient preventive strategy for VTE among patients with lung cancer.     

Effect of Hospitalization During First Chemotherapy and Performance Status on Small-cell Lung Cancer Outcomes

IntroductionSmall-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is highly responsive to chemotherapy (CT) and one of the few malignancies treated in hospitalized patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS). Because of the little current information available on the outcomes experienced by hospitalized patients with SCLC receiving CT, we explored the outcomes for these patients to improve the evidence base for practice.Materials and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate patients with a diagnosis of SCLC and treated with CT during a 10-year period. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated according to site of first CT (inpatient vs. outpatient) and PS. Multivariable analysis was completed to assess for independent survival predictors.ResultsA total of 530 patients with SCLC were treated, with 82 (15%) receiving their first CT in hospital. Inpatients had a greater burden of disease and poorer PS. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, nephrotoxicity, and fatigue were all experienced less often by the inpatient cohort (P < .001, P < .001, P < .001, and P = .007, respectively). For inpatients and outpatients, the OS rate at 12, 24, and 60 months was 22%, 9%, and 7% and 43%, 20%, and 9%, respectively (P < .001 for all). The median PFS and OS were longer for outpatients and highly functional patients. On multivariable analysis, ECOG PS was an independent predictor of the outcome and the site of first CT was not (P = .04 and P = .49, respectively).ConclusionPatients with SCLC initially treated as inpatients and those with poor functional status had shorter PFS and OS; however, some experienced long-term survival, including 5-year survival of 7% for the inpatient cohort and 5% for the ECOG PS 3-4 cohort. CT toxicities were less common in the inpatient cohort, validating that administration of CT in hospital should be considered for these patients because they could experience a meaningful long-term response to therapy.     

Comparison of Two Pediatric-Inspired Regimens to Hyper-CVAD in Hispanic Adolescents and Young Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

BackgroundPediatric-inspired regimens (PIR) in adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia have led to better long-term outcomes. In Latin America, the adolescent and young adult population has an increasing incidence of acute lymphoblastic leukemia with poor outcomes (5-year OS of approximately 20%) with traditional regimens.Patients and MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed of adolescent and young adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients treated with PIR in two reference centers in Mexico City between March 2016 and June 2019, in which the primary endpoint was OS, compared to a historic cohort of patients treated with hyper-CVAD treated between February 2009 and June 2015.ResultsWe compared 73 patients treated with PIR (46 and 27 received modified versions of the ALL-BFM 90 and CALGB C10403 regimens, respectively) and 173 patients treated with hyper-CVAD. Patients treated with PIR experienced higher 4-week complete response rates (79.5% vs. 64.2%; P = .02) and lower relapse rates (44.1% vs. 60.0%; P = .04). OS was significantly higher with PIR than with hyper-CVAD (24 months: 41.5% vs. 28.1%; P = .012). The benefit on OS for PIR was only significant for CALGB (24-month OS: 61.1% vs. 28.0%; P = .01) but not for BFM. In the multivariate analysis, hyperleukocytosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-3.22; P = .02), autologous stem-cell transplantation (HR = 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17-0.86; P = .02), and 4-week complete response (HR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.26-0.70; P < .01) were independent prognostic factors. For the group of patients older than 20 years, only CALGB had an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.97; P = .04).ConclusionIn terms of 4-week complete response, relapse rates, and OS, PIR provides benefits to Hispanic patients.     

A Reappraisal of the Comparative Effectiveness of Lumpectomy Versus Mastectomy on Breast Cancer Survival: A Propensity Score–Matched Update From the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB)

BackgroundRecent observational studies are concerning because they document rising mastectomy rates coinciding with more than a dozen reports that lumpectomy has better overall survival (OS) than mastectomy. Our aim was to determine if there were differences in OS of matched breast cancer patients undergoing lumpectomy versus mastectomy in the National Cancer Database (NCDB).Patients and MethodsA retrospective cohort of patients with stage I-III breast cancer in the NCDB (2004-2013) was identified. Propensity score matching (PSM), Kaplan-Meier, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine OS by type of surgery.ResultsOf 845,136 patients, 464,052 (54.9%) underwent lumpectomy and 381,084 (45.1%) underwent mastectomy. After PSM, the hazard ratio (HR) and confidence interval (CI) for OS in all patients comparing lumpectomy with mastectomy was 1.02 (CI, 1.00-1.04; P = .002). In patients with stage I, II, and III, they were HR 1.27 (CI, 1.23-1.36; P < .001), HR 0.98 (CI, 0.95-1.01; P = .21), and HR 0.83 (CI, 0.80-0.86; P < .001), respectively. In subgroup analyses of all patients by estrogen receptor (ER) status, they were HR 1.05 (CI, 1.03-1.07; P < .001) and HR 1.00 (CI, 0.96-1.03; P = .65) in ER+ and ER− patients.ConclusionIn our primary model of all stage I-III matched patients, using the most recent NCDB data and the largest observational sample size to date, the OS after mastectomy was not inferior to lumpectomy. This finding can be reassuring to patients and providers. In subgroup analyses, the association between type of surgery and OS differed by cancer stage and hormone receptor status.     

Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Cancer Outcome in Locally Advanced Clear Renal Cell Carcinoma

BackgroundTo evaluate the association of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) undergoing radical nephrectomy.Material and MethodsWe retrospectively identified 880 nephrectomies performed between January 2009 and December 2016 in a single center, reviewed data from 478 radical nephrectomies for kidney tumors and identified 187 patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic ccRCC (pT3-T4 N0M0). NLR was obtained preoperatively and calculated by dividing absolute neutrophil count by absolute lymphocyte count. OS and RFS were evaluated by the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to evaluate predictors of RFS and OS.ResultsAmong 187 patients with ccRCC (mean age 63.4 ± 11.5 years; 118 [63.1%] male), the median follow-up was 48.7 months. On univariate analysis, in patients with Fuhrman nuclear grade of differentiation 3-4, the median time to recurrence was significantly shorter with NLR ≥ 4 than < 4 (24 vs. 55 months, P = .045). On multivariable analysis adjusted for NLR ≥ 4, among all variables analyzed (NLR, microvascular invasion, sarcomatoid differentiation, tumor size and body mass index), only nuclear grade of differentiation was an independent predictor of recurrence (hazard ratio 2.18; 95% confidence interval 1.07-4.92, P = .03). The 3-year OS had no statistically significant difference between patients with NLR ≥ 4 or < 4.ConclusionFor patients with locally advanced, nonmetastatic ccRCC, RFS was reduced with high nuclear grade of differentiation and high preoperative NLR. These findings suggest an association between higher NLR and worse outcomes in locally advanced ccRCC.     

Gender-based Disparities in Receipt of Care and Survival in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

BackgroundDespite accounting for a minority of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) diagnoses, females may experience differential survival relative to males. It is unclear if there are gender-based differences in receipt of treatment or disease-related outcomes for patients with MPM. We therefore utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to assess patterns-of-care and overall survival (OS) among patients with MPM by gender.Materials and MethodsPatients with histologically confirmed MPM treated from 2004 to 2013 were identified from the NCDB. The association between female gender and OS was assessed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with propensity score matching. Patterns-of-care were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. The overall treatment effect was tested in subsets of patients by treatment strategy, histology, and clinical stage.ResultsA total of 18,799 patients were identified, of whom 14,728 (78%) were male and 4071 (22%) were female. Females were statistically more likely to present at a younger age, with fewer comorbidities, and with epithelioid histology. Despite these favorable prognostic features, women were less likely to receive surgery (P ≤ .001) or chemotherapy (P ≤ .001) compared with males. On multivariable analysis, female gender was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-0.86; P ≤ .001). Gender-based survival differences were seen across all stages, but only among patients with epithelioid (P ≤ .001) and not biphasic (P = .17) or sarcomatoid (P = 1.00) histology.ConclusionsSurgery and chemotherapy are disproportionately underutilized in female patients with MPM. Despite this concerning disparity, female gender is independently associated with improved survival relative to males. Further research to understand factors that lead to gender disparities in MPM is warranted.     

The Significance of Lymph Node Ratio and Total Lymph Nodes Examined in Determining the Indications of Adjuvant Radiation in pN2 Non–small Cell Lung Cancer

Introduction/BackgroundPast studies have shown mixed results of postoperative radiation (PORT) for pN2 NSCLC patients. We hypothesize that PORT can improve overall survival (OS) in pN2 NSCLC patients with high lymph node ratio (LNR).Materials/MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for non-metastatic pN2 NSCLC patients with R0 surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy from 2004 to 2016. Cox models were used to assess the impact of PORT and LNR on OS adjusted for patient characteristics and treatment information.ResultsAmong 4,050 patients, 1,728 (42.7%) had PORT. There was increased use of IMRT in the more recent period (53.8% in 2010-2016 vs 24.0% in 2004-2009). PORT was associated with better OS in the overall cohort. For patients with inadequate lymph node dissection (LND), PORT marginally improved OS (HR = 0.91, p = 0.058). Among patients with adequate LND, PORT did not improve OS for patients with LNR <15% (HR = 1.11, p = 0.21), or LNR 15-29% (HR = 1.03, p = 0.73), but it significantly improved OS for patients with LNR ≥30% (HR = 0.83, p = 0.006). In patients with LNR≥30%, IMRT significantly improved OS when compared to no PORT (HR = 0.75, p < 0.05) while 3D RT did not (HR = 0.89, p = 0.32).ConclusionsPORT was associated with better survival for pN2 NSCLC patients after R0 resection, adequate LND with high LNR, after accounting for multiple confounders. Among the whole cohort, most of the OS benefits of PORT were driven by patients with inadequate LND, high LNR or use of IMRT.     

Preoperative Elevation of C-Reactive Protein Is a Predictor for Adverse Oncologic Survival Outcomes for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Analysis from the International Marker Consortium Renal Cancer (INMARC)

BackgroundWe sought to analyze the usefulness of pretreatment C-reactive protein (CRP) as a predictor of survival and oncological outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC).MethodsRetrospective international analysis of patients with RCC with pretreatment CRP values from 2006 to 2017. A CRP of more than >5 mg/L was deemed elevated. The cohort was subdivided into 2 groups for analysis (normal CRP ≤5 mg/L; elevated CRP >5). Primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival (RFS). Kaplan–Meier analyses (KMA) and multivariable analyses (MVA) were used to delineate survival outcomes and their predictors.ResultsWe analyzed 2445 patients (1641 male/804 female; normal CRP 1056/elevated CRP 1389; mean follow-up 36 months). Patients with elevated CRP had a higher incidence of hypertension (P = .001), higher body mass index (P < .001), and larger tumor size (6.0 cm vs 3.9 cm; P < .001). MVA for RFS demonstrated elevated CRP (hazard ratio [HR], 1.85; P = .005), tumor size (HR, 1.1; P < .001), and high tumor grade (HR, 3.1; P < .001) to be independent risk factors. For normal vs elevated CRP, KMA for RFS of stages 1–4 RCC revealed a 5-year RFS of 93% vs 88% (P = .001), 95% vs 83% (P = .163), 84% vs 62% (P = .001), and 58% vs 60% (P = .513), respectively. KMA MA KMA for OS of stages 1–4 RCC revealed a 5-year OS of 98% vs 81% (P = .001), 94% vs 80% (P = .103), 94% vs 65% (P = .001), and 99% vs 38% (P < .001), respectively.ConclusionsPretreatment CRP was an independent predictor of RFS and OS in an international multicenter cohort of patients with RCC.     

Impact of Radiation Therapy After High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Lymphomas: A Single Center Experience

IntroductionAfter high dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT), in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), involved field radiation therapy (RT) for consolidation and residual/progressive disease (PD) eradication is a common practice.Materials and methodsRetrospective single-institution cohort analysis to evaluate the impact of early RT after HDC auto-SCT.ResultsBetween 1996 and October 2019, 153 patients (43 DLBCL, 110 HL) underwent RT after HDC auto-SCT. Males 95 (62%), females 58 (38%), median age 24 years. Indications for RT was consolidation 65%: residual disease eradication 16%: and PD eradication 19%. For DLBCL, the median overall survival (OS) for the above indications was not reached (NR):NR:2 months and the KM 5-year OS was 72.6%:64.3%:12.5% respectively (P ≤ .000). Pair-wise analysis showed that consolidation versus residual disease eradication had no difference (P = .88) but both were superior to PD disease eradication (P ≤ 000 and P = .005 respectively). For HL, indication for RT was, 54%:23%:24% respectively. The median OS was NR:NR:28.8 months and KM 5-year OS was 82.3%:78%:30% respectively (P ≤ .000). Pair-wise analysis showed that consolidation versus residual disease eradication had no difference (P = .98) but both were superior to the PD eradication group (P ≤ 000). RT was well tolerated with no significant long-term toxicity.ConclusionPost HDC auto-SCT RT was well tolerated. DLBCL and HL patients with residual disease treated with the RT had similar long-term survival as those who received RT for consolidation. RT failed to improve the poor survival in patients with post-HDC auto-SCT PD.     

Renal Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumor With Inferior Vena Cava Thrombus: Case Series and Literature Review of a Rare but Challenging Entity

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and prognosis of patients with renal primitive neuroectodermal ectodermal tumors (rPNETs) with inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombus.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 6 patients with rPNETs and IVC tumor thrombus between January 2005 and December 2019, and identified 39 published cases through a literature review. The clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and survival data were analyzed.ResultsThe median patient age patients was 26 years, and the male to female ratio was approximately 1:1. The average tumor diameter was 12.5 cm. Seventeen patients (37.8%) showed metastasis at diagnosis. Forty-three cases (95.6%) were managed with surgical resection, and 35 (77.8%) received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Follow-up data were available for 41 patients (median follow-up, 10 months; range, 4.5-13.0). The median overall survival (OS) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were both 30.0 months. Patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had better PFS than those who underwent surgery only (30.0 months [95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-55.7] vs 5.0 months [95% CI, 1.0-9.0]; P = .036). In terms of OS, however, the difference between the 2 groups was not significant (30.0 months [95% CI, 8.4-52.6] vs 7.0 months [95% CI, 4.5-9.5]; P = .244).ConclusionsrPNET with IVCTT is an extremely rare entity that mostly occurs in young adults. Although multidisciplinary treatment is used, the prognosis of this disease remains unclear. RN with IVC tumor thrombectomy is a challenging procedure requiring vascular management techniques and experience. Adjuvant chemotherapy contributes to improved PFS, but not OS. Thus, early diagnosis and treatment play a key role in improving prognosis.     

Clinical Characteristics and Survival Outcomes of Primary Effusion Lymphoma: A National Cancer Database Study

IntroductionPrimary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a rare HHV8(+) non–Hodgkin lymphoma associated with HIV infection or other causes of immunosuppression. Large-scale studies describing the natural history of this entity are lacking.Materials and MethodsNational cancer database (NCDB) was queried for patients diagnosed with PEL between 2004 and 2016. All patients age ≥ 18 years diagnosed with PEL were included. We excluded patients with multiple primary malignancies or lost follow-up. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate cox regression were used in the analyses.ResultsOf the 219 PEL patients included in the analysis, 179 (82%) were males, 161 (74%) Caucasian and 49 (22%) African American. Median age at diagnosis was 60 ± 19 years and median OS (mOS) was 8.5 months. One hundred and fifteen were HIV+, 63 HIV-, 111 received chemotherapy, and 101 did not. Patients who received chemotherapy had better mOS compared to patients who did not receive chemotherapy (13 vs. 3 months, P < .001). This difference was observed in HIV+ patients (22.97 vs. 1.97 months, P = .006), but not in HIV- patients (6.24 vs. 8.20 months, P = .752). On multivariate analysis, chemotherapy treatment was associated with better OS (HR 0.502 95% CI 0.324-0.777; P = .002), whereas HIV status did not affect the OS (HR 0.6 95% CI 0.3-1.4; P = .258).ConclusionThis largest retrospective analysis on PEL revealed that current chemotherapeutic approach is significantly beneficial for HIV+ patients but not for HIV- patients. The rapid advancement in HIV treatment might be playing a role in survival improvement among HIV+ patients. Novel therapies are needed to improve the survival of patients with PEL, especially in HIV- patients.MicroabstractPEL is a rare HHV8(+) non–Hodgkin lymphoma. Using national cancer database, we studied clinical characteristics, and outcomes of 219 PEL patients. We found that chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival in HIV+ patients. However, a similar survival improvement was not seen in HIV- patients. Significant improvement in efficacy of antiretroviral therapy is likely contributing to the survival improvement in HIV+ patients.