Concomitant ALK translocation and EGFR mutation in lung cancer: a comparison of direct sequencing and sensitive assays and the impact on responsiveness to tyrosine kinase inhibitor

EGFR mutations and ALK translocation are considered mutually exclusive. We found that a portion of NSCLCs have EGFR and ALK co-alteration. When using sensitive assays for EGFR, the rate of co-alteration increased up to 15.4% of ALK-positive cases. These patients were sensitive to ALK inhibitors, but not to gefitinib. The clinical relevance of finding co-alteration with sensitive methods was discussed.BackgroundEpidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation are considered mutually exclusive in nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, sporadic cases having concomitant EGFR and ALK alterations have been reported. The present study aimed to assess the prevalence of NSCLCs with concomitant EGFR and ALK alterations using mutation detection methods with different sensitivity and to propose an effective diagnostic and therapeutic strategy.Patients and methodsA total of 1458 cases of lung cancer were screened for EGFR and ALK alterations by direct sequencing and flourescence in situ hybridization (FISH), respectively. For the 91 patients identified as having an ALK translocation, peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-clamping real-time PCR, targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS), and mutant-enriched NGS assays were carried out to detect EGFR mutation.ResultsEGFR mutations and ALK translocations were observed in 42.4% (612/1445) and 6.3% (91/1445) of NSCLCs by direct sequencing and FISH, respectively. Concomitant EGFR and ALK alterations were detected in four cases, which accounted for 4.4% (4/91) of ALK-translocated NSCLCs. Additional analyses for EGFR using PNA real-time PCR and ultra-deep sequencing by NGS, mutant-enriched NGS increased the detection rate of concomitant EGFR and ALK alterations to 8.8% (8/91), 12.1% (11/91), and 15.4% (14/91) of ALK-translocated NSCLCs, respectively. Of the 14 patients, 3 who were treated with gefitinib showed poor response to gefitinib with stable disease in one and progressive disease in two patients. However, eight patients who received ALK inhibitor (crizotinib or ceritinib) showed good response, with response rate of 87.5% (7/8 with partial response) and durable progression-free survival.ConclusionsA portion of NSCLC patients have concomitant EGFR and ALK alterations and the frequency of co-alteration detection increases when sensitive detection methods for EGFR mutation are applied. ALK inhibitors appear to be effective for patients with co-alterations.     

Amplicon-based next-generation sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA for detection of driver and resistance mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundGenomic analysis of plasma cell-free DNA is transforming lung cancer care; however, available assays are limited by cost, turnaround time, and imperfect accuracy. Here, we study amplicon-based plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS), rather than hybrid-capture-based plasma NGS, hypothesizing this would allow sensitive detection and monitoring of driver and resistance mutations in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methodsPlasma samples from patients with NSCLC and a known targetable genotype (EGFR, ALK/ROS1, and other rare genotypes) were collected while on therapy and analyzed blinded to tumor genotype. Plasma NGS was carried out using enhanced tagged amplicon sequencing of hotspots and coding regions from 36 genes, as well as intronic coverage for detection of ALK/ROS1 fusions. Diagnostic accuracy was compared with plasma droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and tumor genotype.ResultsA total of 168 specimens from 46 patients were studied. Matched plasma NGS and ddPCR across 120 variants from 80 samples revealed high concordance of allelic fraction (R² = 0.95). Pretreatment, sensitivity of plasma NGS for the detection of EGFR driver mutations was 100% (30/30), compared with 87% for ddPCR (26/30). A full spectrum of rare driver oncogenic mutations could be detected including sensitive detection of ALK/ROS1 fusions (8/9 detected, 89%). Studying 25 patients positive for EGFR T790M that developed resistance to osimertinib, 15 resistance mechanisms could be detected including tertiary EGFR mutations (C797S, Q791P) and mutations or amplifications of non-EGFR genes, some of which could be detected pretreatment or months before progression.ConclusionsThis blinded analysis demonstrates the ability of amplicon-based plasma NGS to detect a full range of targetable genotypes in NSCLC, including fusion genes, with high accuracy. The ability of plasma NGS to detect a range of preexisting and acquired resistance mechanisms highlights its potential value as an alternative to single mutation digital PCR-based plasma assays for personalizing treatment of TKI resistance in lung cancer.     

Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group (ATORG) Expert Consensus Statement on MET Alterations in NSCLC: Diagnostic and Therapeutic Considerations

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease, with many oncogenic driver mutations, including de novo mutations in the Mesenchymal Epithelial Transition (MET) gene (specifically in Exon 14 [ex14]), that lead to tumourigenesis. Acquired alterations in the MET gene, specifically MET amplification is also associated with the development of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Although MET has become an actionable biomarker with the availability of MET-specific inhibitors in selected countries, there is differential accessibility to diagnostic platforms and targeted therapies across countries in Asia-Pacific (APAC).The Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group (ATORG), an interdisciplinary group of experts from Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea, Mainland China, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam, discussed testing for MET alterations and considerations for using MET-specific inhibitors at a consensus meeting in January 2022, and in subsequent offline consultation.Consensus recommendations are provided by the ATORG group to address the unmet need for standardised approaches to diagnosing MET alterations in NSCLC and for using these therapies. MET inhibitors may be considered for first-line or second or subsequent lines of treatment for patients with advanced and metastatic NSCLC harbouring MET ex14 skipping mutations; MET ex14 testing is preferred within multi-gene panels for detecting targetable driver mutations in NSCLC. For patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and MET amplification leading to EGFR TKI resistance, enrolment in combination trials of EGFR TKIs and MET inhibitors is encouraged.     

Benefit of Targeted DNA Sequencing in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Without EGFR and ALK Alterations on Conventional Tests

BackgroundGenetic sequencing testing has become widely used to inform treatment decisions for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We analyzed benefits of genetic sequencing testing in real practice.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 209 NSCLC patients who had no EGFR and ALK alterations on routine molecular tests and underwent next-generation targeted DNA sequencing of 380 cancer-related genes between November 2013 and October 2016. Median patient age was 59 years. A total of 96 patients (46%) were never smokers, and 195 patients (93%) had adenocarcinoma.ResultsAmong 209 total patients, 64 (31%) demonstrated actionable genetic alterations; 20 had EGFR mutations (6 L858R, 8 exon 19 deletions, 1 L861Q, 1 G719S, 4 exon 20 duplications), 4 ALK fusions, 9 ROS1 fusions, 6 BRAF V600E mutations, 15 RET fusions, 1 MET high-level amplification, 6 MET exon 14 skipping mutations, and 3 ERBB2 exon 20 insertion mutations. Of the 64 patients harboring actionable alterations, 28 patients received therapy targeted to their own actionable alterations (15 EGFR, 3 ALK, 1 ROS1, 8 RET, 1 BRAF). There were significant differences in overall survival between individuals with no actionable alterations, those with actionable alterations but no targeted therapy, and those with actionable alterations and targeted therapy (20.1 vs. 17.1 vs. 66.2 months, P < .001).ConclusionThe results of targeted DNA sequencing testing could provide improved treatment options for some NSCLC patients and result in a survival benefit to NSCLC patients with no EGFR and ALK alterations on routine tests who are treated with targeted therapy.     

Optimization of Routine Testing for MET Exon 14 Splice Site Mutations in NSCLC Patients

Introduction

Genomic alterations affecting splice sites of MNNG HOS transforming gene (MET) exon 14 were recently identified in NSCLC patients. Objective responses to MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been reported in these patients. Thus, detection of MET exon 14 splice site mutations represents a major challenge. So far, most of these alterations were found by full-exome sequencing or large capture-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels, which are not suitable for routine diagnosis.

Blood-Based Next-Generation Sequencing in Adrenocortical Carcinoma

BackgroundAdrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and heterogeneous malignancy with poor prognosis. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing of circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) in patients with ACC, to characterize the genomic landscape of alterations, and to identify potential clinically actionable mutations.MethodsRetrospective analysis of genomic data from 120 patients with ACC who had ctDNA testing between 12/2016 and 10/2021 using Guardant360 (Guardant Health, CA) was performed. ctDNA NGS analysis interrogated single nucleotide variants, fusions, indels, and copy number amplifications of up to 83 genes. The frequency of genomic alterations, landscape of co-occurring mutations, and pathogenic/likely pathogenic alterations with potential targeted therapies was identified. The prevalence of alterations identified in ctDNA was compared to those detected in tissue using a publicly available database (cBioPortal).ResultsThe median age of this cohort was 53 years (range 21-81), and 56% of patients were female. Ninety-six patients (80%) had ≥1 somatic alteration detected. TP53 (52%), EGFR (23%), CTNNB1 (18%), MET (18%), and ATM (14%) were found to be the most frequently altered genes in ACC samples. Pathogenic and/or likely pathogenic mutations in therapeutically relevant genes were observed in 56 patients (47%) and included EGFR, BRAF, MET, CDKN2A, CDK4/6, and ATM. The most frequent co-occurring mutations were EGFR + MET (9%), MET + CDK4 (7%), EGFR + CDK4 (7%), and BRAF + MET (7%). The frequencies of mutations detected in ctDNA were similar to those detected in tissue.ConclusionsUtilizing blood-based NGS to characterize genomic alterations in advanced ACC is feasible in over 80% of patients. Almost half of the patients had actionable mutations with approved therapies in other cancers. This approach might inform the development of personalized treatment options or identify clinical trials available for this aggressive malignancy.     

Sensitivity and Resistance of MET Exon 14 Mutations in Lung Cancer to Eight MET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors In Vitro

BackgroundMNNG HOS transforming gene (MET) exon 14 mutations in lung cancer, including exon 14 skipping and point mutations, have been attracting the attention of thoracic oncologists as new therapeutic targets. Tumors with these mutations almost always acquire resistance, which also occurs in other oncogene-addicted lung cancers. However, the resistance mechanisms and treatment strategies are not fully understood.MethodsWe generated Ba/F3 cells expressing MET exon 14 mutations by retroviral gene transfer. The sensitivities of these cells to eight MET-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were determined using a colorimetric assay. In addition, using N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis, we generated resistant clones, searched for secondary MET mutations, and then examined the sensitivities of these resistant cells to different TKIs.ResultsBa/F3 cells transfected with MET mutations grew in the absence of interleukin-3, indicating their oncogenic activity. These cells were sensitive to all MET-TKIs except tivantinib. We identified a variety of secondary mutations. D1228 and Y1230 were common sites for resistance mutations for type I TKIs, which bind the active form of MET, whereas L1195 and F1200 were common sites for type II TKIs, which bind the inactive form. In general, resistance mutations against type I were sensitive to type II, and vice versa.ConclusionsMET-TKIs inhibited the growth of cells with MET exon 14 mutations. We also identified mutation sites specific for TKI types as resistance mechanisms and complementary activities between type I and type II inhibitors against those mutations. These finding should provide relevant clinical implication for treating patients with lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 mutations.     

MET IHC Is a Poor Screen for MET Amplification or MET Exon 14 Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinomas: Data from a Tri-Institutional Cohort of the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium

IntroductionMNNG HOS Transforming gene (MET) amplification and MET exon 14 (METex14) alterations in lung cancers affect sensitivity to MET proto-oncogene, receptor tyrosine kinase (MET [also known by the alias hepatocyte growth factor receptor]) inhibitors. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), next-generation sequencing (NGS), and immunohistochemistry (IHC) have been used to evaluate MET dependency. Here, we have determined the association of MET IHC with METex14 mutations and MET amplification.MethodsWe collected data on a tri-institutional cohort from the Lung Cancer Mutation Consortium. All patients had metastatic lung adenocarcinomas and no prior targeted therapies. MET IHC positivity was defined by an H-score of 200 or higher using SP44 antibody. MET amplification was defined by copy number fold change of 1.8x or more with use of NGS or a MET-to–centromere of chromosome 7 ratio greater than 2.2 with use of FISH.ResultsWe tested tissue from 181 patients for MET IHC, MET amplification, and METex14 mutations. Overall, 71 of 181 patients (39%) were MET IHC–positive, three of 181 (2%) were MET-amplified, and two of 181 (1%) harbored METex14 mutations. Of the MET-amplified cases, two were FISH positive with MET-to–centromere of chromosome 7 ratios of 3.1 and 3.3, one case was NGS positive with a fold change of 4.4x, and one of the three cases was MET IHC–positive. Of the 71 IHC-positive cases, one (1%) was MET-amplified and two (3%) were METex14-mutated. Of the MET IHC–negative cases, two of 110 (2%) were MET-amplified.ConclusionsIn this study, nearly all MET IHC–positive cases were negative for MET amplification or METex14 mutations. MET IHC can also miss patients with MET amplification. The limited number of MET-amplified cases in this cohort makes it challenging to demonstrate an association between MET IHC and MET amplification. Nevertheless, IHC appears to be an inefficient screen for these genomic changes. MET amplification or METex14 mutations can best be detected by FISH and a multiplex NGS panel.     

High MET Overexpression Does Not Predict the presence of MET exon 14 Splice Mutations in NSCLC: Results From the IFCT PREDICT.amm study

IntroductionMET proto-oncogene (MET) exon 14 splice site (METex14) mutations were recently described in NSCLC and has been reported to correlate with efficacy of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors. High diversity of these alterations makes them hard to detect by DNA sequencing in clinical practice. Because METex14 mutations induce increased stabilization of the MET receptor, it is anticipated that these mutations are associated with MET overexpression. We aim to determine whether NSCLC with high MET overexpression could define a subset of patients with a high rate of METex14 mutations.MethodsFrom The French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup PREDICT.amm cohort of 843 consecutive patients with a treatment-naive advanced NSCLC who were eligible for a first-line therapy, 108 NSCLC samples with high MET overexpression defined by an immunochemistry score 3+ were tested for METex14 mutations using fragment length analysis combined with optimized targeted next-generation sequencing. MET copy number analysis was also derived from the sequencing data.ResultsMETex14 mutations were detected in two patients (2.2%) who also displayed a TP53 mutation and a PIK3CA mutation, respectively. An MET gene copy number increase was observed in seven additional patients (7.7%). Next-generation sequencing analysis revealed inactivating mutations in TP53 (52.7%) and PTEN (1.1%), and oncogenic mutations in KRAS (28.6%), EGFR (7.7%), PIK3CA (4.4%), BRAF (4.4%), NRAS (2.2%), GNAS (1.1%), and IDH1 (1.1%).ConclusionsThe rate of METex14 mutations in NSCLC with high MET overexpression was similar to that found in unselected NSCLC. Moreover, we observed a high frequency of driver alterations in other oncogenes. Consequently these findings do not support the use of MET immunohistochemistry as a surrogate marker for METex14 mutations.     

Upfront Next Generation Sequencing in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), patients with actionable genomic alterations may derive additional clinical benefit from targeted treatment compared to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Current guidelines recommend extensive testing with next generation sequencing (NGS) panels. We investigated the impact of using a targeted NGS panel (TruSight Tumor 15, Illumina) as reflex testing for NSCLC samples at a single institution. Molecular analysis examined 15 genes for hotspot mutation variants, including AKT1, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, FOXL2, GNA11, GNAQ, KIT, KRAS, MET, NRAS, PDGFRA, PIK3CA, RET and TP53 genes. Between February 2017 and October 2020, 1460 samples from 1395 patients were analyzed. 1201 patients (86.1%) had at least one variant identified, most frequently TP53 (47.5%), KRAS (32.2%) or EGFR (24.2%). Among these, 994 patients (71.3%) had clinically relevant variants eligible for treatment with approved therapies or clinical trial enrollment. The incremental cost of NGS beyond single gene testing (EGFR, ALK) was CAD $233 per case. Reflex upfront NGS identified at least one actionable variant in more than 70% of patients with NSCLC, with minimal increase in testing cost. Implementation of NGS panels remains essential as treatment paradigms continue to evolve.     

Distribution and Detectability of EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Variants in NSCLC

IntroductionEGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations represent 5% to 10% of EGFR mutations in NSCLC. Identifying patients with EGFR ex20ins is challenging owing to the limited coverage of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays and the relatively recent use of next-generation sequencing (NGS). This study analyzes the spectrum of EGFR ex20ins variants in a large patient population from a global clinical trial and several real-world cohorts and the ability of PCR kits to identify these alterations.MethodsWe conducted this retrospective analysis in patients with NSCLC who underwent NGS or other sequencing testing and had a known EGFR ex20ins mutation. Patients were gathered from a clinical trial (NCT02716116), a chart review study in Germany, and the LC-SCRUM-Japan, GENIE, and U.S. COTA databases. Proportions of patients with ex20ins variants that could have been detected by six commercially available and widely used PCR kits were calculated in each data set.ResultsOverall, 636 patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations were included in this analysis and 104 unique EGFR ex20ins variants were identified across the data sources. The proportion of patients whose ex20ins could have been detected by any PCR test alone ranged from 11.8% to 58.9% across the data sources.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the PCR tests evaluated would have missed more than 40% of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations. NGS-based genetic testing is preferable than standard PCR assays and can substantially improve the identification of the diverse profile of EGFR ex20ins variants in NSCLC.     

Clinical Impact of Hybrid Capture–Based Next-Generation Sequencing on Changes in Treatment Decisions in Lung Cancer

IntroductionTargeted therapy significantly prolongs survival in lung adenocarcinoma. Current diagnostic guidelines include only EGFR and anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) testing. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) reveals more actionable genomic alterations than do standard diagnostic methods. Data on the influence of hybrid capture (HC)-based NGS on treatment are limited, and we investigated its impact on treatment decisions and clinical outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with advanced lung cancer on whom HC-based NGS was performed between November 2011 and October 2015. Demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics, treatments, and outcome data were collected.ResultsA total of 101 patients were included (median age 63 years [53% females, 45% never-smokers, and 85% with adenocarcinoma]). HC-based NGS was performed upfront and after EGFR/ALK testing yielded negative or inconclusive results in 15% and 85% of patients, respectively. In 51.5% of patients, HC-based NGS was performed before first-line therapy, and in 48.5%, it was performed after treatment failure. HC-based NGS identified clinically actionable genomic alterations in 50% of patients, most frequently in EGFR (18%), Ret proto-oncogene (RET) (9%), ALK (8%), Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) receptor tyrosine kinase gene (6%), and erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene (ERBB2) (5%). In 15 patients, it identified EGFR/ALK aberrations after negative results of prior standard testing. Treatment strategy was changed for 43 patients (42.6%). The overall response rate in these patients was 65% (complete response 14.7%, partial response 50%). Median survival was not reached. Immunotherapy was administered in 33 patients, mostly without an actionable driver, with a presenting disease control rate of 32%, and with an association with tumor mutation burden.ConclusionsHC-based NGS influenced treatment decisions in close to half of the patients with lung adenocarcinoma and was associated with an overall response rate of 65%, which may translate into a survival benefit.     

Relevance of Detection of Mechanisms of Resistance to ALK Inhibitors in ALK-Rearranged NSCLC in Routine Practice

BackgroundAnaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown efficacy in the treatment of ALK-rearranged non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the disease eventually progresses in all patients. In many cases, resistance to ALK TKIs arises through ALK mutations. Although clinical and biological data suggest variations in TKI efficacy according to the mechanism of resistance, ALK mutations are still rarely investigated in routine practice.Materials and MethodsWe performed a retrospective multicentric study with an aim to determine the frequency and clinical relevance of ALK alterations detected using targeted next-generation sequencing in patients with advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC after progression during an ALK TKI treatment. Data on clinical, pathological, and molecular characteristics and patient outcomes were collected.ResultsWe identified 23 patients with advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC who, between January 2012 and May 2017, had undergone at least 1 repeat biopsy at progression during an ALK TKI treatment. A resistance mechanism was identified in 9 of the 23 patients (39%). The anomalies involved included 9 ALK mutations in 8 patients and one ALK amplification. The ALK mutation rate was 15% after failure of a first ALK TKI and 33% after failure of 2 ALK TKI treatments. Five of 7 patients who received a different ALK TKI after detection of an ALK mutation achieved an objective response. All of the patients who received a TKI presumed to act on the detected ALK mutant achieved disease control.ConclusionTargeted next-generation sequencing is suitable for detecting ALK resistance mutations in ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients in routine practice. It might help select the best treatment at the time of disease progression during treatment with an ALK TKI.     

NGS‐based liquid biopsy profiling identifies mechanisms of resistance to ALK inhibitors: a step toward personalized NSCLC treatment

Despite impressive and durable responses, nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors (ALK‐Is) ultimately progress due to development of resistance. Here, we have evaluated the clinical utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiling by next‐generation sequencing (NGS) upon disease progression. We collected 26 plasma and two cerebrospinal fluid samples from 24 advanced ALK‐positive NSCLC patients at disease progression to an ALK‐I. These samples were analyzed by NGS and digital PCR. A tool to retrieve variants at the ALK locus was developed (VALK tool). We identified at least one resistance mutation in the ALK locus in ten (38.5%) plasma samples; the G1269A and G1202R mutations were the most prevalent among patients progressing to first‐ and second‐generation ALK‐Is, respectively. Overall, 61 somatic mutations were detected in 14 genes: TP53, ALK, PIK3CA, SMAD4, MAP2K1 (MEK1), FGFR2, FGFR3, BRAF, EGFR, IDH2, MYC, MET, CCND3, and CCND1. Specifically, a deletion in exon 19 in EGFR, a non‐V600 BRAF mutation (G466V), and the F129L mutation in MAP2K1 were identified in four patients who showed no objective survival benefit from ALK‐Is. Potential ALK‐I‐resistance mutations were also found in PIK3CA and IDH2. Finally, a c‐MYC gain, along with a loss of CCND1 and FGFR3, was detected in a patient progressing on a first‐line treatment with crizotinib. We conclude that NGS analysis of liquid biopsies upon disease progression identified different putative ALK‐I‐resistance mutations in most cases and could be a valuable approach for therapy decision making.     

Potential Resistance Mechanisms Revealed by Targeted Sequencing from Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients with Primary Resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs)

IntroductionEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have greatly improved the prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma. However, approximately 5% to 10% of patients with lung adenocarcinoma with EGFR sensitive mutations have primary resistance to EGFR TKI treatment. The underlying mechanism is unknown.MethodsThis study used next-generation sequencing to explore the mechanisms of primary resistance by analyzing 11 patients with primary resistance and 11 patients sensitive to EGFR TKIs. Next-generation targeted sequencing was performed on the Illumina X platform for 483 cancer-related genes. EGFR mutation was initially detected using the amplification refractory mutation system.ResultsPotential primary resistance mechanisms were revealed by mutations unique to the EGFR TKI resistance group. Among the 11 resistant patients, 45% (five of 11) harbored a known resistance mechanism, such as MNNG HOS Transforming gene (MET) amplification de novo T790M mutation or overlapping T790M and phosphatase and tensin homolog gene (PTEN) loss and erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 gene (ERBB2) amplification. In six of 11 resistant cases (54%), potential novel mutations that might lead to drug resistance were identified (including transforming growth factor beta receptor 1 gene [TGFBR1] mutation and/or EGFR structural rearrangement mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase gene [MTOR] mutation, transmembrane protease, serine 2 gene [TMPRSS2] fusion gene, and v-myc avian myelocytomatosis viral oncogene homolog gene [MYC] amplification). By analyzing somatic mutation patterns, the frequency of C:G→T:A transitions in the patients with primary resistance was significantly higher than that in sensitive group and occurred more frequently in the non-CpG region (Cp(A/C/T)→T).ConclusionThe mechanisms of primary resistance to EGFR TKIs may be highly heterogeneous. Mutations in EGFR and its downstream pathway, as well as mutations that affect tumor cell function, are related to primary resistance. Somatic single-nucleotide mutation patterns might be associated with primary resistance to EGFR TKIs.     

Expression Profiling of Driver Genes in Female Never-smokers With Non-adenocarcinoma Non–small-cell Lung Cancer in China

BackgroundAlthough smoking is a primary cause of lung cancer, females are overrepresented among never-smokers with the disease. The mutational landscape of adenocarcinoma in never-smoking females has been extensively profiled; however, there is little knowledge about genomic alterations in non-adenocarcinoma non–small-cell lung cancer (NA-NSCLC). In the study, we reviewed the status of oncogenic drivers of NA-NSCLC in these populations.Materials and MethodsComprehensive genomic profiling was performed on DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of 52 NA-NSCLC tissues, including 35 squamous cell carcinomas (SQCCs), 11 adenosquamous carcinomas, 5 pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma, and 1 large cell carcinoma by next-generation sequencing within a panel of 68 cancer-related genes.ResultsMutations of the common oncogenic drivers (EGFR, KRAS, ALK, ROS1, MET, RET, and ERBB2) occurred in 61.5% of cases. The frequency of well-established targets (EGFR and ALK), new targets without widely available therapies (MET and ERBB2), and potentially actionable targets (RET and DDR2) in SQCCs of female never-smokers was significantly higher than that in The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. There were 31%, 82%, and 80% of cases with SQCC, adenosquamous carcinoma, and pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma, respectively, harboring at least one of the following targets: EGFR, ALK, ERBB2, and MET. Approximately 78% (7/9) of the patients responded to various targeted treatments.ConclusionFemale never-smokers with NA-NSCLC in this study had a high frequency of currently known or potentially actionable oncogenic alterations and could benefit from targeted therapy. Our study also provides evidence for the recommendation of molecular analysis in never-smoking female SQCC.     

Detection of Novel NRG1, EGFR,and MET Fusions in Lung Adenocarcinomas in the Chinese Population

IntroductionMultiple oncogene fusions beyond ALK receptor tyrosine kinase (ALK), RET, and ROS1 fusion has been described in lung cancer, especially in lung adenocarcinomas without common oncogenic mutations. Molecular inhibitors have been developed and proved effective for patients whose tumors harbor these novel alterations.MethodsA consecutive series of surgically resected lung adenocarcinomas were collected and profiled using an enrichment strategy to detect nine common oncogenic driver mutations and fusions concerning EGFR, KRAS, HER2, BRAF, MET, ALK, RET, ROS1, and FGFR. Driver-negative cases were further analyzed by a comprehensive RNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) fusion assay for novel fusions.ResultsIn total, we profiled 1681 lung adenocarcinomas, among which 255 cases were common driver–negative. One hundred seventy-seven cases had sufficient tissue for NGS fusions screening, which identified eight novel fusions. NRG1 fusions occurred in 0.36% of all lung adenocarcinoma cases (6 of 1681 cases), including 4 CD74-NRG1–positive cases, 1 RBPMS-NRG1–positive case, and 1 novel ITGB1-NRG1–positive case. Furthermore, another 2 novel fusions were also detected, including 1 EGFR-SHC1 fusion and 1 CD47-MET fusion, both of which were in-frame and retained the functional domain of the corresponding kinases. No fusion event was detected for NTRK, KRAS, BRAF or HER2 genes in this cohort. Detailed clinicopathologic data showed that invasive mucous adenocarcinoma (three of eight cases) and acinar-predominant adenocarcinoma (three of eight cases) were the most prevalent pathologic subtypes among novel fusions.ConclusionsFusions affecting NRG1, EGFR, and MET were detected in 0.48% of unselected lung adenocarcinomas, and NRG1 fusions ranked the most prevalent fusions in common driver-negative lung adenocarcinomas from Chinese population. RNA-based NGS fusion assay was an optional method for screening actionable fusions in common driver-negative cases.     

Clinical Outcome of ALK-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients with De Novo EGFR or KRAS Co-Mutations Receiving Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs)

IntroductionNSCLC with de novo anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase gene (ALK) rearrangements and EGFR or KRAS mutations co-occur very rarely. Outcomes with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in these patients are poorly understood.MethodsOutcomes of patients with metastatic NSCLC de novo co-alterations of ALK/EGFR or ALK/KRAS detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (ALK) and sequencing (EGFR/KRAS) from six Swiss centers were analyzed.ResultsA total of 14 patients with adenocarcinoma were identified. Five patients had ALK/EGFR co-alterations and nine had ALK/KRAS co-alterations. Six of seven patients with ALK/KRAS co-alterations (86%) were primary refractory to crizotinib. One patient has had ongoing disease stabilization for 26 months. Of the patients with ALK/EGFR co-alterations, one immediately progressed after receiving crizotinib for 1.3 months and two had a partial response for 5.7 and 7.3 months, respectively. Three of four patients with ALK/EGFR co-alterations treated with an EGFR TKI achieved one or more responses in different lines of therapy: four patients had a partial response, three with afatinib and one with osimertinib. One patient achieved a complete remission with osimertinib, and one patient was primary refractory to erlotinib. Median PFS during treatment with a first EGFR TKI was 5.8 months (range 3.0–6.9 months).ConclusionsDe novo concurrent ALK/KRAS co-alterations were associated with resistance to ALK TKI treatment in seven out of eight patients. In patients with ALK/EGFR co-alterations, outcomes with ALK and EGFR TKIs seem inferior to what would be expected in patients with either alteration alone, but further studies are needed to clarify which patients with ALK/EGFR co-alterations may still benefit from the respective TKI.