Patients' preference of trastuzumab administration (subcutaneous versus intravenous) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: Results of the randomised MetaspHer study

HannaH (NCT00950300) and PrefHer (NCT01401166) studies validated the subcutaneous (H-s.c.) formulation of trastuzumab as effective and safe as intravenous (H-i.v.) and highly preferred by patients in early breast cancer. The present randomised MetaspHer trial (NCT01810393) is the first study assessing patient's preference in metastatic setting.MethodsPatients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer who completed a first line chemotherapy with trastuzumab and achieved a long-term response lasting more than 3 years were randomised to receive 3 cycles of 600-mg fixed-dose adjuvant H-s.c., followed by 3 cycles of standard H-i.v., or the reverse sequence. Primary end-point was overall preference for H-s.c. or H-i.v. at cycle six, assessed by Patient Preference Questionnaire (PPQ). Secondary end-points included healthcare professional (HCP) satisfaction; safety and tolerability; quality of life.ResultsHundred and thirteen patients were randomised and treated. H-s.c. was preferred by 79/92 evaluable intent-to-treat patients (85.9%, 95% confidence interval [CI; 78.8–93.0]; p < 0.001), 13/92 preferred H-i.v. (14.1%, 95% CI [7.0–21.3]). HCPs were most satisfied with H-s.c. (56/88 available data, 63.6%, [53.6–73.7]). On the safety population, adverse events occurred in 73 (67.6%) and 49 (44.1%) patients during the H-s.c. and H-i.v. periods, respectively; 7 (6.5%) and 4 (3.6%) were grade ≥ III, 3 (2.8%) and 2 (1.8%) were serious.ConclusionThe safety was consistent with the known H-i.v. and H-s.c. profiles without safety concern raised. Definitively, patients preferred H-s.c. as reported in early stage by PrefHer study.     

Primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP-like chemotherapy with or without rituximab: results of the Mabthera International Trial Group study

BackgroundThe aim of this subgroup analysis of the Mabthera International Trial Group study was to evaluate the impact of chemotherapy and rituximab in primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL) in comparison to other diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).MethodsPatients were randomly assigned to six cycles of CHOP-like regimens with or without rituximab.ResultsOf 824 patients enrolled, 87 had PMBCL and 627 other types of DLBCL. Rituximab increased the rates of complete remission (unconfirmed) in both PMBCL (from 54% to 80%, P = 0.015) and DLBCL (from 72% to 87%, P < 0.001). In PMBCL, rituximab virtually eliminated progressive disease (PD) (2.5% versus 24%, P < 0.001), whereas without rituximab, PD was more frequent in PMBCL than in DLBCL (24% versus 10%, P = 0.010). With a median observation time of 34 months, 3-year event-free survival (EFS) was improved by rituximab for PMBCL (78% versus 52%, P = 0.012) and for DLBCL (81% versus 61%, P < 0.001). Overall survival benefit was similar for DLBCL (93% versus 85%, P < 0.001) and PMBCL (89% versus 78%, P = 0.158).ConclusionIn young patients with PMBCL (age-adjusted International Prognostic Index 0–1), rituximab added to six cycles of CHOP-like chemotherapy increases response rate and EFS to the same extent as other DLBCL. The combination of rituximab with CHOP chemotherapy is an effective treatment in PMBCL with good prognosis features.     

Combination of lenalidomide and rituximab in elderly patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a phase 2 trial

BackgroundDiffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma and despite recent chemotherapeutic advances up to half of all patients relapse. Here we report the results from a phase 2, single-arm, single-center trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide plus rituximab in elderly patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL.Patients and MethodsBetween March and June 2009, elderly patients (65 years of age or older) with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who had been heavily pretreated were recruited. Oral lenalidomide (20 mg/d for 21 days of each 28-day cycle) was initiated for four cycles and rituximab (375 mg/m²) was administered on day 1 and day 21 of each 28-day cycle for four cycles. After this induction phase, patients achieving a complete response (CR), partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) were given lenalidomide maintenance therapy at the same schedule for another 8 months.ResultsA total of 23 patients with a median of three prior treatments (range, 2 to 8) were included. The overall response rate (CR + PR) at the end of the induction phase was 35% (n = 8). Ten patients (7 CR, 1 PR, and 2 SD patients) were eligible for lenalidomide maintenance and 8 of these patients achieved a CR. Adverse events were manageable and the most common included neutropenia and thrombocytopenia.ConclusionOral lenalidomide in combination with rituximab is active in elderly patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL with a high percentage of patients achieving a continuous CR after lenalidomide maintenance.     

High-dose therapy followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation with and without rituximab for primary treatment of high-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

BackgroundWe aimed to determine safety and efficacy of rituximab (R) in combination with repetitive high-dose therapy (HDT) as primary treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).Patients and methodsPatients aged 18–60 years and elevated lactate dehydrogenase were treated with four cycles of MegaCHOEP and transplantation of autologous stem cells after cycles 2, 3 and 4. Rituximab (375 mg/m²) was given before each cycle and 12 and 33 days after start of the last cycle of chemotherapy. Sixty-four patients given R-MegaCHOEP were compared with 29 patients who had received identical treatment without rituximab.ResultsOverall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) after 3 years were significantly improved in patients treated with R-MegaCHOEP (OS: 78.7% versus 55.0%, P = 0.045; EFS: 72.7% versus 47.2%, P = 0.013). In a Cox regression model adjusted for performance status and stage, relative risk of treatment failure was lower (relative risk 0.5, P = 0.041) and OS was better (relative risk 0.4, P = 0.054) for patients given R-MegaCHOEP. Grade 3/4 infections were more frequent in the R-MegaCHOEP group (18.5% versus 6.0%, P = 0.003).ConclusionsThe addition of rituximab to MegaCHOEP significantly improved outcome in young patients with high-risk DLBCL. The higher incidence of grade 3/4 infections needs consideration when rituximab and HDT regimens are combined.     

CD5-positive diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a retrospective study in 337 patients treated by chemotherapy with or without rituximab

BackgroundCD5-positive (CD5+) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) shows poor prognosis and frequent central nervous system (CNS) relapses under anthracycline-containing chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to determine the prognosis and CNS relapse incidence of CD5+ DLBCL in the rituximab era.Patients and methodsWe analyzed 337 patients with CD5+ DLBCL who received chemotherapy with (R-chemotherapy group; n = 184) or without (chemotherapy group; n = 153) rituximab.ResultsNo significant difference was found in clinical background comparisons between the two groups. In the R-chemotherapy group, 60% of the patients were older than 65 years at diagnosis. Both the complete response rate and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the R-chemotherapy group (P = 0.0003 and P = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analysis confirmed that chemotherapy without rituximab was associated with unfavorable OS. However, the probability of CNS relapse did not differ between the two groups (P = 0.89). The CNS relapse was strongly associated with short OS (P < 0.0001). In the R-chemotherapy group, 83% of patients who experienced CNS relapse had parenchymal disease.ConclusionsOur results indicate that rituximab improves the OS of patients with CD5+ DLBCL but does not decrease the CNS relapse rate. More effective treatments with CNS prophylaxis are needed for CD5+ DLBCL patients.     

Patients' preferences for subcutaneous trastuzumab versus conventional intravenous infusion for the adjuvant treatment of HER2-positive early breast cancer: final analysis of 488 patients in the international,randomized, two-cohort PrefHer study

BackgroundPatients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (EBC) preferred subcutaneous (s.c.) trastuzumab, delivered via single-use injection device (SID), over the intravenous (i.v.) formulation (Cohort 1 of the PrefHer study: NCT01401166). Here, we report patient preference, healthcare professional satisfaction, and safety data pooled from Cohort 1 and also Cohort 2, where s.c. trastuzumab was delivered via hand-held syringe.Patients and methodsPatients were randomized to receive four adjuvant cycles of 600 mg fixed-dose s.c. trastuzumab followed by four cycles of standard i.v. trastuzumab, or vice versa. The primary endpoint was overall preference proportions for s.c. or i.v., assessed by patient interviews in the evaluable ITT population.ResultsA total of 245 patients were randomized to receive s.c. followed by i.v. and 243 received i.v. followed by s.c. (evaluable ITT populations: 235 and 232 patients, respectively). s.c. was preferred by 415/467 [88.9%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 85.7–91.6; P < 0.0001; two-sided test against null hypothesis of 65% s.c. preference]; 45/467 preferred i.v. (9.6%; 95% CI 7–13); 7/467 indicated no preference (1.5%; 95% CI 1–3). Clinician-reported adverse events occurred in 292/479 (61.0%) and 245/478 (51.3%) patients during the pooled s.c. and i.v. periods, respectively (P < 0.05; 2 × 2 χ²); 16 patients (3.3%) in each period experienced grade 3 events; none were grade 4/5.ConclusionsPrefHer revealed compelling and consistent patient preferences for s.c. over i.v. trastuzumab, regardless of SID or hand-held syringe delivery. s.c. was well tolerated and safety was consistent with previous reports, including the HannaH study (NCT00950300). No new safety signals were identified compared with the known i.v. profile in EBC. PrefHer and HannaH confirm that s.c. trastuzumab is a validated and preferred option over i.v. for improving patients' care in HER2-positive breast cancer.Clinicaltrials.gov registration numberNCT01401166.     

Brief-Duration Rituximab/Chemotherapy Followed by Maintenance Rituximab in Patients With Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Who Are Poor Candidates for R-CHOP Chemotherapy: A Phase II Trial of the Sarah Cannon Oncology Research Consortium

Introduction:Patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who are very elderly or have poor performance status are difficult to treat with a full course of R-CHOP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) therapy. In this phase II trial, we treated this group of patients with a novel regimen containing 3 courses of rituximab/chemotherapy followed by maintenance rituximab.Patients and Methods:Patients with newly diagnosed stage II-IV DLBCL were eligible if they were considered poor candidates for 6-8 cycles of R-CHOP therapy. Patients who were eligible for anthracycline therapy received 3 cycles of rituximab plus cyclophosphamide/mitoxantrone/vincristine/prednisone (CNOP); the remainder of patients received R-CVP (rituximab plus cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone). Patients without progression after completion of 3 cycles received 4 courses of maintenance rituximab (375 mg/m² weekly × 4, repeated every 6 months) for 24 months.Results:Between May 2003 and July 2007, 51 patients were enrolled. The median age was 78 years, and 43% of patients were > 80 years of age. Nineteen patients (37%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2, and 72% had high-intermediate or high-risk International Prognostic Index scores. After a median follow-up of 48 months, the 2-, 3-, and 4-year progression-free survival rates are 71%, 65%, and 56%, respectively. The 2-, 3-, and 4-year overall survival rates are 72%, 67%, and 67%, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, with few severe toxicities and no treatment-related deaths.Conclusion:This abbreviated course of rituximab/chemotherapy, followed by maintenance rituximab, was active and well tolerated in these very elderly patients. Brief-duration rituximab/chemotherapy as well as maintenance rituximab merit further evaluation in this setting.     

Phase I trial of rituximab,cladribine, and temsirolimus (RCT) for initial therapy of mantle cell lymphoma

BackgroundWe conducted this trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of temsirolimus added to an established regimen comprised of rituximab and cladribine for the initial treatment of mantle cell lymphoma.Patients and methodsA standard phase I cohort of three study design was utilized. The fixed doses of rituximab and cladribine were 375 mg/m² i.v. day 1 and 5 mg/m²/day i.v. days 1–5 of a 28-day cycle, respectively. There were five planned temsirolimus i.v. dose levels: 15 mg day 1; 25 mg day 1; 25 mg days 1 and 15; 25 mg days 1, 8 and 15; and 25 mg days 1, 8, 15, and 22.ResultsSeventeen patients were treated: three each at levels 1–4 and five at dose level 5. The median age was 75 years (52–86 years). Mantle Cell International Prognostic Index (MIPI) scores were low in 6% (1), intermediate in 59% (10), and high in 35% (6) of patients. Five patients were treated at level 5 without dose limiting toxicity. Hematologic toxicity was frequent: grade 3 anemia in 12%, grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 41%, grade 4 thrombocytopenia in 24%, grade 3 neutropenia in 6%, and grade 4 neutropenia in 18% of patients. The overall response rate (ORR) was 94% with 53% complete response and 41% partial response. The median progression-free survival was 18.7 months.ConclusionsTemsirolimus 25 mg i.v. weekly may be safely added to rituximab and cladribine at 375 mg/m² i.v. day 1 and 5 mg/m²/day i.v. days 1–5 of a 28-day cycle, respectively. This regimen had promising preliminary activity in an elderly cohort of patients with mantle cell lymphoma.ClinicalTrials.gov IdentifierNCT00787969.     

Rituximab and CHOP chemotherapy plus GM-CSF for previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in the elderly: a Wisconsin oncology network study

PurposeHuman recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) may potentiate rituximab activity by upregulating CD20 expression and activating effector cells necessary for antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. GM-CSF was combined with standard rituximab + CHOP (cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) chemotherapy (R-CHOP) in the treatment of elderly patients with de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).Patients and MethodsThirty-eight patients over the age of 60 years with newly diagnosed DLBCL were treated with R-CHOP every 21 days for 6–8 cycles and GM-CSF 250 μg/m² per day on days 3–10. Patients were evaluated for response after cycles 4, 6, and 8. The primary endpoint was the rate of complete response, and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival, and overall survival (OS).ResultsThirty-eight patients were enrolled, with a median age of 72 years, and 29% of patients having high-risk disease (International Prognostic Index [IPI] score ≥ 4). A complete or unconfirmed complete response (CR) was achieved in 53% of patients. After a median follow-up of 51.1 months, the 3-year PFS and OS were 78% and 84%. Twenty-one percent of patients discontinued protocol treatment because of chemotherapy-related toxicity and 16% because of GM-CSF toxicity. Dose intensity for planned chemotherapy cycles was 81.1%.ConclusionThese data suggest that survival outcomes may be modestly improved when GM-CSF is combined with R-CHOP in the treatment of elderly DLBCL. GM-CSF had toxicity precluding planned administration in 16% of patients, which may limit usefulness of this agent. Further investigation of GM-CSF in combination with rituximab-containing chemotherapy is warranted.     

Prospective,Randomized Control Trial Investigating the Impact of a Physician-Communicated Radiation Therapy Plan Review on Breast Cancer Patient-Reported Satisfaction

PurposePatients with breast cancer face complex medical decision-making. We investigated the impact of a physician-communicated, patient-specific radiation therapy (RT) plan review on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant RT in a prospective randomized trial.Methods and materialsPatients with stage I-III breast cancer treated with adjuvant RT were prospectively randomized to a standard nondetailed review (Arm A) versus an in-depth, individualized RT plan review during week 1 of RT (Arm B). Plan review included visualization of the treatment plan, RT doses, beam arrangements, normal tissue doses, and dose/volume constraints. Patient-reported satisfaction was assessed using a subset of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Treatment Satisfaction - Patient Satisfaction questionnaire related to physician communication (PC), technical competency (TC), confidence and trust (C&T), and overall satisfaction (OS). The difference in mean scores at baseline, week 1, and the end of RT were assessed.ResultsFrom March 2014 to March 2016, 64 patients with breast cancer (37 in Arm A; 27 in Arm B) were randomized and completed all 3 surveys. Mean baseline scores for PC, TC, C&T, and OS mean were 2.73 (standard deviation [SD], 0.71), 2.66 (SD, 0.86), 2.56 (SD, 0.98), and 2.27 (SD, 0.88), respectively, with high baseline scores in both arms. There was no difference in baseline-reported communication indicators between the arms. There were no significant differences among the 3 time points for PC, TC, C&T, or OS (P = .63, .53, 0.52, and 0.71, respectively).ConclusionsWe report the first randomized trial evaluating the impact of in-depth RT plan review on PROs during breast radiation. Both baseline and postintervention scores were high for all domains. Detailed patient assessment, understanding of communication types, and information processing may be necessary to determine subtle PRO differences. Further investigations of PROs could potentially direct and optimize physician and patient communication during RT.     

Radioimmunotherapy with (131)I-rituximab for patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL)

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with radioiodinated human/murine chimeric anti‐CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (¹³¹I‐rituximab) for treating Korean patients with relapsed or refractory B‐cell non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL). Methods: All patients received unlabeled rituximab 70 mg immediately prior to the administration of a therapeutic dose (median dose: 7.3 GBq) of ¹³¹I‐rituximab. The tumor response was evaluated 1 month later by contrast enhanced ¹⁸F‐fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography‐computed tomography. Results: Between May 2004 and October 2006, 24 patients received single treatment with ¹³¹I‐rituximab. The overall response rate (ORR) was 29%; 46% (three complete responses, two partial responses (PR) for patients with low grade B‐cell NHL (LGL) and 9% (one PR) for patients with diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL). After a median follow‐up of 55 months, the median progression‐free survival (PFS) for all the patients was 2.2 months. The median overall survival (OS) was 11.3 months. There were statistically significant differences between the LGL and the DLBCL for the median PFS (4.5 months vs 1.3 months, respectively, P = 0.0007) and the median OS (30.3 months vs 6.5 months, respectively, P = 0.0295). Grades 3–4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 33% (8/24) and 21% (5/24) of the patients, respectively. Conclusion: RIT with ¹³¹I‐rituximab seems to be effective and tolerable for patients with refractory LGL, although this treatment had modest activity in patients with refractory DLBCL. Further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy of ¹³¹I‐rituximab for treating the patients with DLBCL.     

Fotemustine-based therapy in combination with rituximab as a first-line induction chemotherapy followed by WBRT for newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma:a prospective phase Ⅱ trial

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and feasibility of the rituximab, fotemustine, pemetrexed, and dexamethasone(R-FPD) regimen followed by whole-brain radiotherapy(WBRT) for patients with primary central nervous system lymphoma(PCNSL).Methods: A prospective, single-center phase II clinical trial was conducted. Patients with PCNSL newly diagnosed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between July 2018 and July 2020 were studied. The R-FPD regimen cons...     

Immunochemotherapy with rituximab,methotrexate, procarbazine,and lomustine for primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) in the elderly

BackgroundPrimary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is an aggressive extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma confined to the central nervous system. In this article, we report the results of a pilot trial adding rituximab to the established regimen consisting of methotrexate, procarbazine, and lomustine (R-MCP).Design and methodsPCNSL patients ≥65 years without Karnofsky performance score (KPS) limit were included. R-MCP regimen consisted of rituximab (375 mg/m² i.v. on days -6, 1, 15, and 29), methotrexate (3 g/m² i.v., days 2, 16, and 30) followed by folinic rescue, procarbazine (60 mg/m² orally, days 2–11), and lomustine (110 mg/m² orally, day 2). A maximum of three 43-day cycles were applied. Primary end point was response to treatment obtained by magnetic resonance imaging. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsTwenty-eight patients were included (median age 75, median KPS 60%). Best documented response: complete remission in 18 of 28 (64%), partial remission in 5 of 28 (18%), stable disease in 1 of 28 (4%), and progressive disease in 2 of 28 (7%) patients. Response was not assessed in two patients. Two treatment-associated deaths were observed. After a median follow-up of 36 months, the 3-year PFS and OS was 31%.ConclusionR-MCP regimen is well tolerated and active in elderly patients with newly diagnosed PCNSL.     

Phase III study of ACVBP versus ACVBP plus rituximab for patients with localized low-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (LNH03-1B)

BackgroundThe superiority of a chemotherapy with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin and prednisone (ACVBP) in comparison with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristin and prednisone plus radiotherapy for young patients with localized diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) was previously demonstrated. We report the results of a trial which evaluates the role of rituximab combined with ACVBP (R-ACVBP) in these patients.Patients and methodsUntreated patients younger than 66 years with stage I or II DLBCL and no adverse prognostic factors of the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index were randomly assigned to receive three cycles of ACVBP plus sequential consolidation with or without the addition of four infusions of rituximab.ResultsA total of 223 patients were randomly allocated to the study, 110 in the R-ACVBP group and 113 in the ACVBP group. After a median follow-up of 43 months, our 3-year estimate of event-free survival was 93% in the R-ACVBP group and 82% in the ACVBP group (P = 0.0487). Three-year estimate of progression-free survival was increased in the R-ACVBP group (95% versus 83%, P = 0.0205). Overall survival did not differ between the two groups with a 3-year estimates of 98% and 97%, respectively (P = 0.686).ConclusionIn young patients with low-risk localized DLBCL, rituximab combined with three cycles of ACVBP plus consolidation is significantly superior to ACVBP plus consolidation alone.     

Phase I trial of toll-like receptor 9 agonist PF-3512676 with and following rituximab in patients with recurrent indolent and aggressive non Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PURPOSE: PF-3512676 (formerly CpG 7909) is a novel Toll-like receptor 9-activating oligonucleotide with single-agent antitumor activity that augments preclinical rituximab efficacy. This Phase I trial was designed to investigate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary antitumor activity of PF-3512676 in combination with rituximab. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with relapsed/refractory CD20+ B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma received i.v. rituximab (375 mg/m2/week for 4 weeks) and PF-3512676 weekly for 4 weeks either i.v. (0.04, 0.16, 0.32, or 0.48 mg/kg) or s.c. (0.01, 0.04, 0.08, or 0.16 mg/kg). An additional extended-treatment cohort received 4 weeks of 0.24 mg/kg s.c. PF-3512676 in combination with rituximab followed by s.c. PF-3512676 alone weekly for 20 weeks. RESULTS: Patients (N = 50) had received a median of three prior therapies (range, 1-11) including rituximab in 80% of patients. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 11 of 19 (58%) i.v. patients, 15 of 19 (79%) s.c. patients, and all 12 patients in the extended-treatment cohort. Most common adverse events were mild to moderate systemic flu-like symptoms and injection-site reactions (s.c. cohorts only). Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in four patients. Objective responses occurred in 12 of 50 (24%) patients overall and in 6 of 12 (50%) patients in the extended-treatment cohort, including 2 patients with rituximab-refractory disease. CONCLUSION: Brief or extended-duration PF-3512676 can be safely administered in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.     

A phase 2 randomised study of ramucirumab (IMC-1121B) with or without dacarbazine in patients with metastatic melanoma

BackgroundTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab (IMC-1121B; LY3009806), a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, alone and in combination with dacarbazine in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic melanoma (MM).MethodsEligible patients received ramucirumab (10 mg/kg) + dacarbazine (1000 mg/m²) (Arm A) or ramucirumab only (10 mg/kg) (Arm B) every 3 weeks. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), overall response and safety.FindingsOf 106 randomised patients, 102 received study treatment (Arm A, N = 52; Arm B, N = 50). Baseline characteristics were similar in both arms. Median PFS was 2.6 months (Arm A) and 1.7 months (Arm B); median 6-month PFS rates were 30.7% and 17.9% and 12-month PFS rates were 23.7% and 15.6%, respectively. In Arm A, 9 (17.3%) patients had partial response (PR) and 19 (36.5%), stable disease (SD); PR and SD in Arm B were 2 (4.0%) and 21 (42.0%), respectively. Median OS was 8.7 months in Arm A and 11.1 months in Arm B. Patients in both arms tolerated the treatment with limited Grade 3/4 toxicities.InterpretationRamucirumab alone or in combination with dacarbazine was associated with an acceptable safety profile in patients with MM. Although the study was not powered for comparison between treatment arms, PFS appeared greater with combination therapy. Sustained disease control was observed on both study arm.     

No benefit of adjuvant Fluorouracil Leucovorin chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cancer of the rectum (LARC): Long term results of a randomized trial (I-CNR-RT)

Background and purposeTo evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NACT-RT). The study was funded by the Italian National Research Council (CNR).MethodsFrom September 1992 to January 2001, 655 patients with LARC (clinically T3–4, any N) treated with NACT-RT and surgery, were randomized in two arms: follow-up (Arm A) or 6 cycles of ACT with 5 fluorouracil (5FU)-Folinic Acid (Arm B). NACT-RT consisted of 45 Gy/28/ff concurrent with 5FU (350 mg/sqm) and Folinic Acid (20 mg/sqm) on days 1–5 and 29–33; surgery was performed after 4–6 weeks. Median follow up was 63·7 months. Primary end point was overall survival (OS).Results634/655 patients were evaluable (Arm A 310, Arm B 324); 92·5% of Arm A and 91% of Arm B patients received the preoperative treatment as in the protocol; 294 patients of Arm A (94·8%) and 296 of Arm B (91·3%) underwent a radical resection; complete pathologic response and overall downstaging rates did not show any significant difference in the two arms. 83/297 (28%) patients in Arm B, never started ACT. Five year OS and DFS did not show any significant difference in the two treatment arms. Distant metastases occurred in 62 patients (21%) in Arm A and in 58 (19·6%) in Arm B.ConclusionsIn patients with LARC treated with NACT-RT, the addition of ACT did not improve 5 year OS and DFS and had no impact on the distant metastasis rate.     

Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with fludarabine, mitoxantrone, and rituximab followed by yttrium-90 ibritumomab tiuxetan and maintenance rituximab as front-line therapy for patients with follicular or marginal zone lymphoma

BackgroundWe conducted a single-institution phase II clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of combination chemoimmunotherapy followed by radioimmunotherapy consolidation and rituximab maintenance as front-line treatment in indolent lymphomas.Patients and MethodsWe enrolled 20 patients with intermediate- to high-risk follicular lymphoma and 2 patients with marginal zone lymphoma. Treatment consisted of 4-6 cycles of FM (fludarabine 25 mg/m² on days 1-3, mitoxantrone 12 mg/m² on day 1 of each 28-day cycle). The protocol was amended after enrolling the first 4 patients to include rituximab 375 mg/m² on day 1. After 6-8 weeks, responders received ⁹⁰Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan (Zevalin) followed by maintenance rituximab (375 mg/m² weekly × 4 doses, repeated every 6 months for 2 years).ResultsAfter R-FM, the overall response rate was 95% with a complete response rate (CR) of 45% (n = 10), a partial response (PR) rate of 50% (n = 11), and stable disease in 1 patient. Nineteen patients received ⁹⁰Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan with a 60% conversion rate of PR to CR, resulting in an improved CR of 79% (n = 15) and a PR of 21% (n = 4). Fifteen patients proceeded to rituximab maintenance resulting in 3 patients with PR converting to CR. At median follow-up of 49.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 47.2 months and median overall survival (OS) was not reached in an intent-to-treat analysis. The most common adverse effects were hematologic, with 2 patients experiencing treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), evolving to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in 1 patient.ConclusionR-FM with ⁹⁰Y-ibritumomab tiuxetan consolidation and rituximab maintenance is well tolerated, improving CR rates and maintaining durable responses in patients with untreated indolent lymphomas.     

Rituximab versus observation after high-dose consolidative first-line chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

BackgroundThis study compared the induction regimens doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and etoposide (ACE) with doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, bleomycin and prednisone (ACVBP) before high-dose therapy (HDT) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with poor-risk diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A second randomisation compared rituximab with observation post-ASCT.Materials and methodsFour hundred and seventy-six patients <60 years old with newly diagnosed CD20+ DLBCL were randomised to induction with ACE or ACVBP. Three hundred and thirty responders received HDT followed by ASCT. After ASCT, 269 patients were re-randomised to receive either maintenance rituximab or observation alone. Randomisation was stratified by the quality of response to ASCT. The primary end point of this study was event-free survival (EFS).ResultsAt a median of 4 years’ follow-up from the second randomisation, there was a trend (P = 0.1) towards increased EFS for patients who received rituximab compared with observation.ConclusionThe type of induction therapy (ACVBP or ACE) did not significantly affect overall survival at a median 51 months’ follow-up.     

Midtreatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography in aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND:

The use of ¹⁸F‐fluorodeoxyglucose positron‐emission tomography (PET) scan has increased considerably in the clinical management of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma patients, and its role as a prognostic factor during chemotherapy has been established recently.

METHODS:

Between May 2003 and May 2009, 91 newly diagnosed patients with primary mediastinal large B‐cell lymphoma (PMLBCL) and diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) were treated with 12 weekly cycles of rituximab‐MACOP‐B (n = 12 patients with PMLBCL), 6 cycles of rituximab‐CHOP21 (n = 65 patients with DLBCL, aged < 60 years and 1 patient with PMLBCL), or 8 weekly cycles of rituximab‐VNCOP‐B (n = 13 DLBCL patients, aged ≥ 60 years). All patients underwent a staging PET examination at baseline and a midtreatment (interim) PET examination after 6 weeks of rituximab‐MACOP‐B treatment, 3 cycles of rituximab‐CHOP21 treatment, or 4 weeks of rituximab‐VNCOP‐B treatment and again at the end of the chemo‐immunotherapy regimen.

RESULTS:

At midtreatment evaluation, 35 patients showed a persistently positive PET scan; only 6 (17%) of these patients achieved a continuous complete response (CCR). However, 56 patients presented with a negative interim PET, and 50 (89%) of these patients achieved and maintained a CCR. Comparison between the 2 PET groups indicated a statistically significant association between PET findings and event‐free survival (P = .0001) and overall survival (P = .0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this study indicated that midtreatment PET may represent a significant step forward in helping physicians make crucial decisions on further treatment. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.