Recombinant human growth hormone and recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I diminish the catabolic effects of hypogonadism in man: metabolic and molecular effects

Severe gonadal androgen deficiency can have profound catabolic effects in man. Hypogonadal men develop a loss of lean body mass, increased adiposity, and decreased muscle strength despite normal GH and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) concentrations. We designed these studies to investigate whether GH or IGF-I administration to male subjects with profound hypogonadism can diminish or abolish the catabolic effects of testosterone deficiency. Moreover, we also examined the nature of the interactions among GH, IGF-I, and androgens in specific genes of the im system. A group of 13 healthy subjects (mean age, 22 +/- 1 yr) was studied at baseline (D1) and 10 weeks after being made hypogonadal using a GnRH analog (GnRHa; D2). At 6 weeks from baseline they were started on either recombinant human (rh) IGF-I (60 microg/kg, sc, twice daily) or rhGH (12.5 microg/kg, sc, daily) for 4 weeks. On each study day subjects had infusions of L-[(13)C]leucine; indirect calorimetry; isokinetic dynamometry of the knee extensors; determination of body composition (dual energy x-ray absortiometry) and hormone and growth factor concentrations, as well as percutaneous muscle biopsies. Their data were compared with those of previously studied male subjects who received only GNRHA: Administration of rhIGF-I and rhGH to the hypogonadal men had similar effects on whole body metabolism, with maintenance of protein synthesis rates, fat oxidation rates, and fat-free mass compared with the eugonadal state, preventing the decline observed with hypogonadism alone. This was further amplified by the molecular assessment of important genes in muscle function. During rhIGF-I treatment, im expression of IGF-I declined, and IGF-binding protein-4 increased, similar to the changes during GnRHa alone. However, rhGH administration was associated with a marked increase in IGF-I and androgen receptor messenger ribonucleic acid concentrations in skeletal muscle with a reciprocal decline in IGF-binding protein-4 expression in the hypogonadal men. The gene expression for myostatin did not change. These effects were accompanied by a much greater increase in plasma IGF-I concentrations after rhIGF-I (225 +/- 32 vs. 768 +/- 117 microg/L) compared with the concentrations achieved during rhGH (217 +/- 20 vs. 450 +/- 19 microg/L). We conclude that 1) rhGH and rhIGF-I both may be beneficial in preserving lean body mass and sustaining rates of protein synthesis during states of severe androgen deficiency in man; 2) GH may affect the im IGF system via an a paracrine, local production of IGF-I; 3) androgens may be necessary for the full anabolic effect of GH/IGF-I in man. These hormones, particularly GH, may play a role in the treatment of hypogonadal men rendered hypogonadal pharmacologically or those unable to take full testosterone replacement. The latter requires further study.     

Effects of estrogen and recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I on ghrelin secretion in severe undernutrition

Ghrelin is a nutritionally regulated gut peptide that increases with fasting and chronic undernutrition and decreases with food intake. Sex steroid levels change in chronic undernutrition and might signal changes in ghrelin. At the same time, chronic undernutrition is characterized by low IGF-I that might also influence ghrelin, either directly or through changes in the GH axis. Little is known regarding sex steroid regulation of ghrelin and the effects of IGF-I on ghrelin in severe undernutrition. We investigated the effects of sex steroids and IGF-I on ghrelin in 78 female subjects with anorexia nervosa simultaneously randomized to receive estrogen (Ovcon 35, 35 microg ethinyl estradiol, and 0.4 mg norethindrone) as well as recombinant human (rh)IGF-I (30 microg/kg sc twice a day) in a two-by-two factorial model, in which the individual effects of estrogen (E) and rhIGF-I on ghrelin could be determined. Subjects were 24.9 +/- 0.7 (mean +/- sem) yr of age and had low weight (body mass index, 16.7 +/- 0.2 kg/m(2)). At baseline, ghrelin was inversely correlated with body mass index (r = -0.39, P = 0.0005) and IGF-I (r = -0.30, P = 0.01). IGF-I increased significantly more in subjects receiving rhIGF-I alone (Delta 23.0 +/- 5.8 nmol/liter) and rhIGF-I and E (Delta 34.9 +/- 6.3 nmol/liter) compared with subjects receiving E alone (Delta -3.2 +/- 1.9 nmol/liter) or control (C; rhIGF-I placebo and no E) (Delta 0.4 +/- 2.0 nmol/liter) (overall P < 0.0001 by multivariate analysis of variance, P < 0.0001 for rhIGF-I vs. C, P < 0.0001 for rhIGF-I and E vs. C). Ghrelin increased significantly more over 6 months in response to E alone (Delta 150 +/- 86 pg/ml), rhIGF-I alone (Delta 198 +/- 116 pg/ml), and the combination (E and rhIGF-I) (Delta 441 +/- 214 pg/ml) compared with C (Delta -39 +/- 48 pg/ml) (overall P = 0.02 by multivariate analysis of variance, P = 0.01 for E vs. C, P = 0.04 for rhIGF-I vs. C, and P = 0.001 for rhIGF-I and E vs. C). Weight, caloric intake, and morning GH levels did not change significantly between the groups, but the change in ghrelin was inversely related to the change in GH among all subjects (r = -0.27, P = 0.03).Our data demonstrate that, in a model of severe undernutrition, rhIGF-I and E individually increase ghrelin levels. The mechanisms of these effects are unknown and may relate to direct effects on ghrelin or changes in GH. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanisms by which rhIGF-I and E increase ghrelin in human physiology.     

Body composition and quality of life in adults with growth hormone deficiency; effects of low-dose growth hormone replacement

OBJECTIVE: Adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) is characterized by abnormalities in body composition and a poor perceived quality of life (QoL). Weight-based high-dose growth hormone replacement (GHR) results in improvements in body composition and QoL in AGHD. However, a high patient percentage reported side-effects on high-dose GHR resulting in a high rate of patient withdrawal from growth hormone (GH) treatment. High-dose GH therapy also leads to supraphysiological serum insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) concentrations that have been associated with breast and prostate cancer, raising major concerns over the use of such high-dose GH regimen in AGHD. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of low-dose growth hormone replacement (GHR) on body composition and QoL as early as 1 and 3 months. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, open treatment design study to determine the early effects of low-dose GH administration on body composition and QoL. GH was initiated at a daily dose of 0.4-0.5 IU, and titrated up to achieve and maintain IGF-I standard deviation score (IGF-I SDS) between the median and upper end of the age-related reference range. PATIENTS: Forty-six, post-pituitary surgery, severe AGHD patients (22 women), defined as peak GH response < 9 mU/l to provocative testing. The mean age was 50.4 years (range 26-72). Forty-three patients required additional pituitary replacement hormones following pituitary surgery and were on optimal doses at recruitment. MEASUREMENTS: Body composition and QoL were assessed prior to GHR and subsequently at 1 and 3 months after initiating GHR. Body mass index (BMI) and waist hip ratio (WHR) were calculated from measurements of height, weight, and waist and hip circumference, respectively. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) was used to determine body fat and lean body mass. QoL was assessed using the disease-specific 'QoL-assessment of growth hormone deficiency in adults (QoL-AGHDA)' questionnaire. Serum IGF-I was measured at each visit to assess the adequacy of GHR. RESULTS: IGF-I and IGF-I SDS increased significantly at 1 and 3 months (P < 0.001) after commencing GHR. The increase in IGF-I (P < 0.05) and IGF-I SDS (P < 0.01) was significant between 1 and 3 months in the absence of any significant increase in GH dose (P = ns) during this period. Eighty-five per cent of patients achieved IGF-I SDS levels between median and upper end of the age-related reference range after 3 months of GHR, and no side-effects were reported during this period. There was a significant reduction in body fat percentage (BFP) from 36.1 +/- 9.1% at baseline to 34.9 +/- 9.3% (P < 0.01) at 1 month and 34.1 +/- 9.2% (P < 0.001) at 3 months. Body fat mass (BFM) reduced from 32.8 +/- 13.6 kg at baseline to 31.9 +/- 13.9 kg at 1 month (P < 0.05) and 31.1 +/- 13.6 kg at 3 months (P < 0.001). These changes in BFP and BFM occurred in the absence of any significant change in BMI and WHR (P = ns). Lean body mass (LBM) was 55.9 +/- 11.1 kg at baseline and increased to 57.1 +/- 11.3 kg after 1 month (P < 0.01) and to 57.6 +/- 11.5 kg (P < 0.001) after 3 months of GHR. Significant improvement was observed in the perceived QoL with the AGHD assessment scores reducing from 13.3 +/- 6.4 to 11.5 +/- 6.6 within 1 month (P < 0.01) and 10.0 +/- 6.6 at 3 months (P < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between improvement in QoL and changes in body fat percentage (r = 0.01 at 1 month and r = 0.12 at 3 months, P = ns) or IGF-I levels (r = 0.04 and r = 0.003, P = ns at 1 and 3 months, respectively). The improvement in body composition and QoL was significant between 1 and 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose GHR improves body composition and QoL as early as 1 month after commencement and the beneficial effects continue at 3 months. Most importantly, these changes occur in the absence of side-effects. We therefore suggest the use of low-dose GH therapy, maintaining IGF-I between the median and upper end of the age-related reference range, for the treatment of AGHD.     

Effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I administration on spontaneous and growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone-stimulated GH secretion in anorexia nervosa

Exaggerated GH and reduced insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels are common features in anorexia nervosa (AN). A reduction of the negative IGF-I feedback could account, in part, for GH hypersecretion. To ascertain this, we studied the effects of recombinant human (rh)IGF-I on spontaneous and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)-stimulated GH secretion in nine women with AN [body mass index, 14.1 +/- 0.6 kg/m2] and in weight matched controls (normal weight). Mean basal GH concentrations (mGHc) and GHRH (2.0 microg/kg, iv) stimulation were significantly higher in AN. rhIGF-I administration (20 microg/kg, sc) significantly reduced mGHc in AN (P < 0.01), but not normal weight, and inhibited peak GH response to GHRH in both groups; mGHc and peak GH, however, persisted at a significantly higher level in AN. Insulin, glucose, and IGFBP-1 basal levels were similar in both groups. rhIGF-I inhibited insulin in AN, whereas glucose remained unaffected in both groups. IGFBP-1 increased in both groups (P < 0.05), with significantly higher levels in AN. IGFBP-3 was under basal conditions at a lower level in AN (P < 0.05) and remained unaffected by rhIGF-I. This study demonstrates that a low rhIGF-I dose inhibits, but does not normalize, spontaneous and GHRH-stimulated GH secretion in AN, pointing also to the existence of a defective hypothalamic control of GH release. Moreover, the increased IGFBP-1 levels might curtail the negative IGF-I feedback in AN.     

Effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I administration on the growth hormone (gh) response to GH-releasing hormone in obesity

Circulating GH levels are reduced in obesity due to true reduction of the 24-h GH production rate. GH insufficiency in obesity might reflect neuroendocrine abnormalities and/or alterations in peripheral hormones and metabolic factors. The somatotroph response to provocative stimuli including GHRH is markedly blunted in obese patients. However, the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in obesity shows also peculiar refractoriness to the inhibitory effect of glucose load. In this present study we aimed at verifying the effect of low dose rhIGF-I (20 microgram/kg, sc, at 0 min) on the GH response to GHRH (1 microgram/kg, iv, at 180 min) in obesity. With this goal in mind, six obese women with abdominal adiposity [OB; age (mean +/- SEM), 32.3 +/- 4.4 yr; body mass index, 32.8 +/- 2.3 kg/m(2)] were studied. The effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) administration on circulating total IGF-I, insulin, and glucose levels were also evaluated. The results in OB were compared with those recorded in age-matched lean women (NW; age, 28.3 +/- 1.2 yr; body mass index, 20.1 +/- 0.5 kg/m(2)), in whom the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I had already been shown. Basal IGF-I levels in OB were similar to those in NW (199.7 +/- 33.3 vs. 274.4 +/- 25.3 microgram/L). The mean GH concentration over 3 h (from 0-180 min) in OB was lower than that in NW (0.9 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.6 +/- 0.8 microgram/L; P = NS). Administration of GHRH induced a GH response in OB lower than that in NW (area under the curve from 180-270 min, 576.5 +/- 137.5 vs. 1315.9 +/- 189.9 microgram/L.min; P < 0.02). Administration of rhIGF-I increased circulating IGF-I levels in both groups to the same percent extent (326.8 +/- 28.3 and 420.3 +/- 26.5 microgram/L in OB and NW, respectively). rhIGF-I administration inhibited the GH response to GHRH in OB (240.1 +/- 99.6 microgram/L; P < 0.05) as well as in NW (730.2 +/- 288.1 microgram/L; P < 0.05), although it failed to lower the mean GH concentration over 3 h in either OB or NW. After rhIGF-I the GH response to GHRH in OB was slight and was still lower (P < 0.05) than that in NW; in fact, the percent decreases were similar in both groups (44.21 +/- 14.06 and 48.21 +/- 13.95 microgram/L, in OB and NW, respectively). The mean insulin (107.1 +/- 21.9 and 36.8 +/- 7.2 pmol/L), but not glucose (4.0 +/- 0.3 and 4.1 +/- 0.1 mmol/L), levels calculated over 270 min, were higher (P = 0.005) in OB than in NW; rhIGF-I administration did not modify insulin and glucose levels in either group. Our study shows that the sc administration of a low rhIGF-I dose inhibits the somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in obese as well as in normal subjects, indicating that somatotroph sensitivity to the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I is preserved in obesity.     

The effects of recombinant human growth hormone on body composition and glucose metabolism in HIV-infected patients with fat accumulation

GH has been proposed as a therapy for patients with HIV-associated fat accumulation, but the pharmacological doses (6 mg/d) used have been associated with impaired fasting glucose and hyperglycemia. In contrast, physiologic doses of GH ( approximately 1 mg/d) in HIV-negative men reduced visceral adiposity and eventually improved insulin sensitivity, despite initially causing insulin resistance. We conducted an open-label study to evaluate the effects of a lower pharmacologic dose of GH (3 mg/d) in eight men with HIV-associated fat accumulation. Oral glucose tolerance, insulin sensitivity, and body composition were measured at baseline, and 1 and 6 months. Six patients completed 1 month and 5, 6 months of GH therapy. IGF-I levels increased 4-fold within 1 month of GH treatment. Over 6 months, GH reduced buffalo hump size and excess visceral adipose tissue. Total body fat decreased (17.9 +/- 10.9 to 13.5 +/- 8.4 kg, P = 0.05), primarily in the trunk region. Lean body mass increased (62.9 +/- 6.4 to 68.3 +/- 9.1 kg, P = 0.03). Insulin-mediated glucose disposal, measured by a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, declined at month 1 (49.7 +/- 27.5 to 25.6 +/- 6.6 nmol/kg(LBM).min/pmol(INSULIN)/liter, P = 0.04); values improved at month 6 (49.2 +/- 22.6, P = 0.03, compared with month 1) and did not differ significantly from baseline. Similarly, the integrated response to an oral glucose load worsened at month 1 (glucose area under the curve 20.1 +/- 2.3 to 24.6 +/- 3.7 mmol.h/liter, P < 0.01), whereas values improved at month 6 (22.1 +/- 1.5, P = 0.02, compared with month 1) and did not differ significantly from baseline. One patient developed symptomatic hyperglycemia within 2 wk of GH initiation; baseline oral glucose tolerance testing revealed preexisting diabetes despite normal fasting glucose. In conclusion, GH at 3 mg/d resulted in a decrease in total body fat and an increase in lean body mass in this open-label trial. While insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance initially worsened, they subsequently improved toward baseline. However, the dose of GH used in this trial was supraphysiologic and led to an increase in IGF-I levels up to three times the upper normal range. Because there are known adverse effects of long-term GH excess, the effectiveness of lower doses of GH should be studied. We also recommend a screening oral glucose tolerance test be performed to exclude subjects at risk for GH-induced hyperglycemia.     

Continuation of growth hormone (GH) replacement in GH-deficient patients during transition from childhood to adulthood: a two-year placebo-controlled study

Previous studies have demonstrated beneficial effects of GH replacement, in adults with GH deficiency (GHD), on body composition, physical fitness, and quality of life. These studies, however, concern patients with adult-onset GHD or childhood-onset (CO) patients enrolled several years after withdrawal of initial therapy. So far, the effects of continuation of GH-administration in patients with CO-GHD have not been examined. We studied a group of nineteen young adults (13 males + 6 females; 16-26 yr old; mean age, 20.2 +/- 0.65 yr) with CO-GHD, in a randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial for 1 yr, followed by an open phase with GH for 1 yr. All patients received GH therapy at the start of study, and trial medication (GH/placebo) was given in a similar dose. Patients randomized to continued GH treatment exhibited no significant changes in any parameters tested, but intra- and interindividual variations in insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I levels could suggest compliance problems. Discontinuation of GH for 1 yr resulted in a decrease in serum IGF-I, from 422.0 +/- 56.8 to 147.8 +/- 33.4 microg/L, in the placebo group (P = 0.003). After discontinuation of GH for 1 yr, an increase in total body fat (TBF, kg), measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan, was seen [placebo: 22.7 +/- 2.7 to 26.5 +/- 2.5 (P = 0.01); GH: 16.2 +/- 2.1 to 17.2 +/- 2.1 (not significant)]. Resumption of GH after placebo was followed by increments in serum IGF-I (microg/L) [from 147.8 +/- 33.4 to 452 +/- 76 (P = 0.001)] and IGF-binding protein 3, as well as in fasting glucose (mmol/L) [4.9 +/- 0.2 vs. 5.3 +/- 0.2 (P = 0.03)]. After resumption of GH lean body mass (kg) increased [52.4 +/- 4.9 vs. 60.7 +/- 5.6 (P = 0.006)]. Likewise, resumption of GH therapy increased thigh muscle volume and thigh muscle/fat ratio, as assessed by computed tomography [muscle volume (cm2/10 mm): 118.2 +/- 11.7 vs. 130.0 +/- 10.9 (P = 0.002); muscle/fat ratio: 1.33 +/- 0.24 vs. 1.69 +/- 0.36 (P = 0.02)]. In conclusion, discontinuation of GH treatment in GHD patients, during the transition from childhood to adulthood, induces significant and potentially unfavorable changes in IGF-I and body composition, both of which are reversed after resumption of GH treatment. By contrast, continuation of GH therapy results in unaltered IGF-I and body composition. We recommend continuation of GH therapy in these patients, to be undertaken in collaboration between pediatricians and adult endocrinologists.     

Effects of growth hormone (GH) on ghrelin, leptin, and adiponectin in GH-deficient patients

Ghrelin is a recently discovered gastric peptide that increases appetite, glucose oxidation, and lipogenesis and stimulates the secretion of GH. In contrast to ghrelin, GH promotes lipolysis, glucose production, and insulin secretion. Both ghrelin and GH are suppressed by intake of nutrients, especially glucose. The role of GH in the regulation of ghrelin has not yet been established. We investigated the effect of GH on circulating levels of ghrelin in relation to its effects on glucose, insulin, body composition, and the adipocyte-derived peptides leptin and adiponectin. Thirty-six patients with adult-onset GH deficiency received recombinant human GH for 9 months in a placebo-controlled study. Body composition and fasting serum analytes were assessed at baseline and at the end of the study. The GH treatment was accompanied by increased serum levels of IGF-I, reduced body weight (-2%) and body fat (-27%), and increased serum concentrations of glucose (+10%) and insulin (+48%). Ghrelin levels decreased in 30 of 36 subjects by a mean of -29%, and leptin decreased by a mean of -24%. Adiponectin increased in the women only. The decreases in ghrelin and leptin correlated with changes in fat mass, fat-free mass, and IGF-I. The reductions in ghrelin were predicted independently of the changes in IGF-I and fat mass. It is likely that the reductions in ghrelin and leptin reflect the metabolic effects of GH on lipid mobilization and glucose production. Possibly, a suppression of ghrelin promotes loss of body fat in GH-deficient patients receiving treatment. The observed correlation between the changes in ghrelin and IGF-I may suggest that the GH/IGF-I axis has a negative feedback on ghrelin secretion.     

Long-term monitoring of insulin sensitivity in growth hormone-deficient adults on substitutive recombinant human growth hormone therapy

Since the effects of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement therapy on glucose metabolism are still a matter of debate, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the impact of long-term rhGH treatment on insulin sensitivity. Simple indices of insulin resistance (IR) and insulin sensitivity (IS), based on fasting glucose and insulin, such as the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and the quantitative insulin check index (QUICKI), were used to estimate the degree of IR and IS in 20 normoglycemic patients (11 men and 9 women; mean age, 44 +/- 14 years) with severe adult-onset GH deficiency (GHD). Measurements were determined at baseline and after 1 and 5 years of continuous rhGH therapy. Basal values were compared to those obtained in 20 healthy sex- and age-matched controls. Starting rhGH dose ranged from 3 to 8 microg/kg/d in keeping with sex and age, then doses were titrated according to insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels. At baseline all patients had low IGF-I levels (10 +/- 5.4 nmol/L), high body mas index (BMI; 27.5 +/- 4 kg/m(2)), and elevated body fat percentage (BF%; 31.8 +/- 9.6). Fasting glucose and insulin levels, as well as HOMA-IR and QUICKI, did not differ significantly from those recorded in the control group. After 1 year of rhGH replacement therapy, normalization in IGF-I levels and a significant reduction in BF% were observed (P <.001), and these effects were maintained after 5 years of treatment. Fasting glucose increased from 79 +/- 10 to 87 +/- 13, and 87 +/- 12 mg/dL (P <.05) after 1 and 5 years of therapy, respectively. Fasting insulin significantly increased after 1 year, without further modifications in the long-term follow-up. HOMA-IR significantly increased from 2.1 +/- 1.7 to 2.5 +/- 1.7 (P <.05) after 1 year, then decreased to 2.3 +/- 1.5 (P = not significant [NS] v basal) after 5 years. A specular decrease in QUICKI from 0.37 +/- 0.05 to 0.34 +/- 0.03 (P <.01) occurred after 1 year, with a trend to increase (0.35 +/- 0.04; P = NS v basal) after 5 years. No patient developed impaired fasting glucose. In conclusion, rhGH therapy determined an increase in fasting glucose and insulin levels, causing in the short-term period a worsening of IS. The sustained reduction in BF%, without further deterioration of IS, suggests that long-term beneficial effects on body composition may overcome the negative influence of GH on glucose metabolism.     

Recombinant human IGF-I does not modify the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH and hexarelin, a peptidyl GH secretagogue, in humans

An inhibitory influence of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) on hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has been hypothesized. In fact, it has been reported that the rhGH (recombinant human GH)-induced IGF-I increase inhibits both cortisol and GH response to MK-0677, a non-peptidyl GH secretagogue in animals. The aim of this study was to further clarify the inhibitory role, if any, of IGF-I on corticotroph function. We studied the effect of rhIGF-I (recombinant human IGF-I; 20 microg/kg s.c. at -180 min) or placebo on the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH (human CRH; 2.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min) or hexarelin (HEX; 2.0 microg/kg i.v. at 0 min), a peptidyl GHS, in normal young women. The effect of rhIGF-I on the GH response to HEX was also studied. The subjects were six normal young women [age: 26-35 yr; body mass index (BMI): 19-23 kg/m2] in their early follicular phase. The results showed that after s.c. rhIGF-I administration, circulating IGF-I levels increased approximately 77%, peaking at -60 min and persisting similar up to +120 min. The mean ACTH, cortisol and GH concentrations did not change from -180 to 0 min when evaluated after both placebo or rhIGF-I. CRH and HEX induced similar ACTH (peak vs baseline, mean+/-SE: 47.5+/-10.9 vs 21.3+/-3.0 pg/ml and 30.3+/-6.9 vs 19.2+/-3.8 pg/ml, respectively; p<0.04) and cortisol responses (177.5+/-5.4 vs 109.3+/-10.3 microg/l and 149.4+/-12.3 vs 119.8+/-16.4 microg/l, respectively, p<0.04). RhIGF-I pretreatment did not modify the ACTH and cortisol responses to hCRH (46.0+/-13.8 pg/ml and 181.1+/-16.9 microg/l, respectively) as well as those to HEX (28.8+/-5.0 pg/ml and 144.1+/-16.2 microg/l, respectively). On the other hand, the GH response to HEX was clearly reduced by rhIGF-I (23.9+/-4.7 vs 64.7+/-14.8 microg/l, p<0.05). Our findings show that rhIGF-I-induced increase of circulating IGF-I levels exerts negative feedback action on somatotroph secretion, while it does not modify the corticotroph and the adrenal responsiveness to CRH or hexarelin.     

Effects of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and estrogen administration on IGF-I,IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-2, and IGFBP-3 in anorexia nervosa: a randomized-controlled study

Administration of recombinant human (rh) IGF-I has been shown to have positive effects on bone density in anorexia nervosa, but the effects of rhIGF-I and estrogen on IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-2 and IGFBP-3 in anorexia nervosa are not known. Sixty-five osteopenic women with anorexia nervosa were randomized to rhIGF-I (30 micro g/kg sc twice daily) alone (n = 15), daily ethinyl estradiol (Ovcon 35) with rhIGF-I (n = 15), estradiol and placebo (n = 15), or placebo (n = 14) for 9 months. Subjects were 25.6 +/- 0.8 yr of age, low weight (body mass index 16.6 +/- 0.2 kg/m(2)) and osteopenic (T scores -2.06 +/- 0.09 for spine and -1.76 +/- 0.13 for hip). IGFBP-3 correlated with total hip bone density (r = 0.47, P = 0.0002) and was a significant predictor of hip bone density (P = 0.010) independent of IGF-I and body mass index in a multivariate regression model. During therapy, IGFBP-2 increased by 48 +/- 19 ng/ml in response to rhIGF-I and decreased by -38 +/- 22 ng/ml in response to placebo (P = 0.011). IGFBP-3 decreased (-895 +/- 120 ng/ml) in response to rhIGF-I but showed a minimal change (-53 +/- 99 ng/ml) in response to placebo (P < 0.0001). In contrast, no significant effect of estrogen was seen on IGF-I, IGFBP-2 or IGFBP-3. Among patients receiving rhIGF-I, the change in IGFBP-2 was inversely associated with the change in total hip bone density (R = -0.47, P = 0.013). In conclusion, our data suggest that chronic rhIGF-I administration increases IGF-I and IGFBP-2 and decreases IGFBP-3 in women with anorexia nervosa. IGFBP-2 and IGFBP-3 may be important determinants of bone density in this population.     

Arginine counteracts the inhibitory effect of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I on the somatotroph responsiveness to growth hormone-releasing hormone in humans

Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) exerts a negative feedback effect on GH secretion via either direct actions at the pituitary level or indirect ones at the hypothalamic level, through stimulation of somatostatin (SS) and/or inhibition of GHRH release. In fact, recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I) in humans inhibits spontaneous GH secretion as well as the GH response to GHRH and even more to GH/GH-releasing peptides, whose main action is on the hypothalamus, antagonizing SS and enhancing GHRH activity. The aim of the present study was to further clarify in humans the mechanisms underlying IGF-I-induced inhibition of somatotroph secretion. In six normal young volunteers (all women; mean +/- SEM: age, 28.3+/-1.2 yr; body mass index, 21.3+/-1.2 kg/m2) we studied the GH response to GHRH (1 microg/kg, iv, at 0 min), both alone and combined with arginine (ARG; 0.5 g/kg, iv, from 0-30 min), which probably acts via inhibition of hypothalamic SS release, after pretreatment with rhIGF-I (20 microg/kg, sc, at -180 min) or placebo. rhIGF-I increased circulating IGF-I levels (peak at -60 vs. -180 min: 54.9+/-3.9 vs. 35.9+/-3.3 mmol/L; P < 0.05) to a reproducible extent, and these levels remained stable and within the normal range until 90 min. The mean GH concentration over 3 h (from -180 to 0 min) before ARG and/or GHRH was not modified by placebo or rhIGF-I. After placebo, the GH response to GHRH (peak, 23.6+/-2.9 microg/L) was strikingly enhanced (P < 0.05) by ARG coadministration (69.6+/-9.9 microg/L). rhIGF-I blunted the GH response to GHRH (13.1+/-4.5 microg/L; P < 0.05), whereas that to GHRH plus ARG was not modified (59.5+/-8.9 microg/L), although it occurred with some delay. Mean glucose and insulin concentrations were not modified by either placebo or rhIGF-I. In conclusion, ARG counteracts the inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on somatotroph responsiveness to GHRH in humans. These findings suggest that the acute inhibitory effect of rhIGF-I on the GH response to GHRH takes place on the hypothalamus, possibly via enhancement of SS release, and that ARG overrides this action.     

Lack of reduction in body fat after treatment with insulin-like growth factor-I in two children with growth hormone gene deletions

Two patients with growth hormone (GH) gene deletions were treated with recombinant insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) (80-240 (microg/kg/day) and the effects on bone mass and body composition were compared to administration of GH (0.075 U/kg/day) to 8 patients with idiopathic GH deficiency. Bone mass and body composition were measured by dual photon X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA ) before and 3 and 6 months after treatment with GH or IGF-I. Similar increases in growth velocities were observed after GH and IGF-I treatment. Treatment with GH resulted in prompt and significant reduction in body fat percentage (basal, 3 and 6 months: 22+/-10, 17+/-9, and 16+/-9%) whereas body fat percentage remained unchanged after IGF-I therapy (basal, 3 and 6 months: 49, 52 and 48% in patient 1 and 45, 42 and 43% in patient 2, respectively). Fat percentage remained elevated after 18 months of IGF-I treatment in patients 1 (51%) and 2 (44%), respectively. Lean mass and bone mineral content increased with GH and IGF-I therapies. We conclude that reduction of body fat measured by DEXA, observed after administration of GH but not after IGF-I treatment in these children with GH deficiency, suggests that the GH effect on body fat mass is not mediated by circulating IGF-I.     

Contrasting effects of oral and transdermal routes of estrogen replacement therapy on 24-hour growth hormone (GH) secretion, insulin-like growth factor I, and GH-binding protein in postmenopausal women

Estrogen deficiency may account for lower circulating GH and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) concentrations in the menopause. Since the liver is the major source of circulating IGF-I and oral estrogens have nonphysiological effects on hepatic function, we have compared GH secretion over 24 h from 20 min sampling and serum IGF-I levels in premenopausal women (n = 7, follicular phase) and postmenopausal women before and after 2 months of cyclical replacement therapy with either oral ethinyl estradiol (EE, 20 micrograms daily; n = 7) or transdermal 17 beta-estradiol (E2, 100 micrograms patches applied twice weekly; n = 7). The extent of GH binding to its serum binding protein was also examined by measuring the percent specific binding of [125I] GH in serum. Mean 24-h serum GH and serum IGF-I were significantly lower (P less than 0.05) in postmenopausal than in premenopausal women. Oral and transdermal estrogen therapy resulted in a comparable degree of gonadotropin suppression. Oral EE treatment increased mean 24-h serum GH (2.0 +/- 0.4 to 7.0 +/- 0.6 mIU/L, P less than 0.0005) and mean pulse amplitude (5.3 +/- 1.2 to 11.2 +/- 2.5 mIU/L, P less than 0.01) but significantly reduced circulating IGF-I (0.70 +/- 0.09 to 0.47 +/- 0.04 U/mL, P less than 0.02) levels. Oral EE increased the percent specific binding of [125I]GH (22.0 +/- 1.6 to 32.0 +/- 1.9%, P less than 0.0005), however the derived mean 24-h free serum GH concentrations were significantly higher (P less than 0.0005) after treatment. By contrast, transdermal E2 administration, which restored circulating E2 concentrations to the midfollicular range, increased circulating IGF-I (0.86 +/- 0.15 to 1.10 +/- 0.14 U/mL, P less than 0.005) to levels that were not significantly different from those of premenopausal women (1.41 +/- 0.21 U/mL). This was not accompanied by changes in 24-h GH secretion or the percent specific binding of [125I]GH in serum. The route of administration is a major determinant of the effects of exogenous estrogens on the GH/IGF-I axis. Oral estrogen administration inhibits hepatic IGF-I synthesis and increases GH secretion through reduced feedback inhibition. Reduced GH secretion in the menopause is not explained by estrogen deficiency since GH secretion is not restored by the attainment of physiological E2 concentrations using the transdermal route. The contrasting route dependent IGF-I responses have important implications for the long-term benefit of hormone replacement therapy in the menopause.     

Radionuclide angiocardiographic evaluation of the cardiovascular effects of recombinant human IGF-I in normal adults

OBJECTIVE: IGF-I possesses specific myocardial receptors and is able to promote cardiac remodelling and even inotropic effects in both humans and other animals. In fact, reduced cardiac mass and performance are present in GH deficiency and these alterations are counteracted by recombinant human (rh) GH replacement, restoring IGF-I levels. Recently, the acute administration of 60 microg/kg rhIGF-I has also been reported to be able to improve cardiac performance evaluated by echocardiography or impedance cardiography in normal subjects. The aim of our study was to verify the effects of a subcutaneous low dose of rhIGF-I (20 microg/kg) on cardiac performance in humans. METHODS: In six healthy male adults (mean+/-S. e.m.: 35.7+/-4.3 years of age), the effects of rhIGF-I on left ventricular function evaluated by radionuclide angiocardiography and on circulating IGF-I, GH, insulin, glucose and catecholamines levels were studied. RESULTS: Administration of rhIGF-I increased circulating IGF-I (peak at +150 min vs baseline: 330.2+/- 9.6 vs 199. 7+/-8.7 microg/l, P<0.03) to levels which persisted similarly up to +180min. Neither GH nor catecholamine levels were modified by rhIGF-I administration, while insulin and glucose levels showed a slight but significant decrease. Basal left ventricular ejection fraction (61.8+/-2.0%) significantly increased at +180 min after rhIGF-I (65.3+/-2.7%, P<0.03). No change was recorded in mean blood pressure while a non-significant trend towards a reduction of heart rate was present by +120 min. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that even subcutaneous administration of a low dose of rhIGF-I has acute inotropic effects as evaluated by radionuclide angiocardiography in healthy adults.     

Body composition, fasting leptin, and sex steroid administration determine GH sensitivity in peripubertal short children.

Serum IGF-I levels in GH-treated subjects demonstrate a wide range of responsiveness to GH. However, the factors influencing GH sensitivity are not well known. The aim of this work was 1) to test whether body composition (determined by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry) or factors related to body composition (fasting blood glucose, FFA, C-peptide, leptin, and insulin sensitivity determined by an insulin tolerance test) influence GH sensitivity; and 2) to study the effect of sex steroid priming on GH sensitivity. We measured serum IGF-I at baseline and 24 h after a single administration of GH (2 mg/m(2)) in 60 healthy prepubertal and early pubertal children (height, -2.1 +/- 1.0 SD score). GH sensitivity, as estimated by the increase in serum IGF-I after GH administration (difference between stimulated and baseline serum IGF-I = delta IGF-I), was also determined after a short-term administration of oral ethinyl E2 in girls and im T in boys. The serum IGF-I concentration was 297 +/- 114 microg/liter at baseline and increased to 429 +/- 160 microg/liter, corresponding to a 46 +/- 29% increase over the baseline value (P < 0.0001, stimulated vs. baseline serum IGF-I). delta IGF-I was not different between gender or pubertal stage. There were positive correlations (P < 0.001) between delta IGF-I and adiposity (total body fat, r = 0.62; trunk fat, r = 0.62), fasting leptin (r = 0.64), and C-peptide (r = 0.54), and a negative correlation with fasting FFA (r = -0.33; P < 0.05) even after adjustment for age, gender, and pubertal stage. These factors remained significant independent predictors of the absolute as well as the percent increase in serum IGF-I in multiple regression analyses. Priming with T and ethinyl E2 had a similar stimulating effect on the serum GH peak in response to the insulin tolerance test. In boys, serum baseline IGF-I increased by 60%, and delta IGF-I was similar after vs. before T administration. By contrast, in girls, serum baseline IGF-I was similar, and delta IGF-I was 60% less after vs. before ethinyl E2 administration. This study indicates that 1) GH sensitivity is determined by fat mass, serum fasting leptin, C-peptide, and FFA; and 2) oral ethinyl E2 and im T have divergent effects on the IGF-I response to a single administration of GH.     

The effect of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in adult patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and GH deficiency

OBJECTIVES: Specific problems in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) and GH deficiency are hypoglycaemic attacks, increased insulin sensitivity and loss of energy. These problems may be related to GH deficiency. PATIENTS: GH replacement was initiated in five patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and GH deficiency for 6 months [four males and one female, mean age 41.6 +/- 3.8 years, mean +/- standard error of the mean (SEM); body mass index (BMI) 22.3 +/- 1.2 kg/m2]. METHODS: Body composition (bioimpedance), metabolic control [haemoglobin A1C (HbA1C)], insulin requirement and frequency of hypoglycaemia were measured, and quality of life was assessed using validated questionnaires. Monthly eye photographs were taken. RESULTS: IGF-I concentrations were below the age-adjusted range at baseline and increased significantly following GH replacement therapy [analysis of variance (ANOVA), P < 0.05]. Diabetes control as assessed by HbA1C remained stable (8.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 8.0 +/- 0.4), but needed a 1.75-fold increase in insulin dose/day. Lean body mass tended to increase (P = 0.07) and body fat mass decreased significantly (P > 0.01). Number of severe hypoglycaemic (< 3 mmol/l) attacks decreased significantly (P < 0.04) and quality of life assessed by validated questionnaires improved significantly in all patients [Psychological and General Well-Being Schedule (PGWBS), P < 0.04; Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), P < 0.05]. Monthly eye photographs revealed no changes in the retina in any patients. CONCLUSION: GH replacement therapy has a beneficial effect at the dose used. It restores body composition and decreases frequency and severity of hypoglycaemic episodes, thus improving quality of life. Long-term trials are needed to determine the safety of GH replacement therapy in these patients.     

Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I stimulates growth and has distinct effects on organ size in hypophysectomized rats.

Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I) was infused subcutaneously into hypophysectomized rats for as long as 18 days. Three hundred micrograms (39 nmol) of rhIGF-I per day and 200 milliunits (4.5 nmol) of human growth hormone (hGH) per day increased body weight, tibial epiphyseal width, longitudinal bone growth, and trabecular bone formation similarly. Weight gains of the kidneys and spleen, however, were greater with rhIGF-I than with hGH, whereas the weight of the epididymal fat pads was reduced with rhIGF-I. The weight of the thymus was increased by rhIGF-I treatment. Thus, IGF-I administered over a prolonged period of time mimics GH effects in hypophysectomized rats. Quantitative differences between rhIGF-I and hGH treatment with respect to organ weights may be related to different forms of circulating IGF-I or may be due to independent effects of GH and IGF-I. The results support the somatomedin hypothesis, but they also stress the role of GH as a modulator of IGF-I action.     

Short term continuous intravenous infusion of growth hormone (GH) inhibits GH-releasing hormone-induced GH secretion: a time-dependent effect

We previously reported that GH secretion evoked by GHRH is inhibited after 5 days of treatment with im GH. This impaired pituitary response was associated with a significant increase in the serum concentration of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). To dissociate the possible effects of circulating IGF-I from other effects of GH on the pituitary response to GHRH, we carried out the following study in eight normal men. A bolus injection of GHRH (1 microgram/kg, iv) was administered 2 h after the start of a 4-h continuous iv infusion of GH (180-micrograms bolus dose, then 3 micrograms/min in 150 mmol/L NaCl) or placebo (150 mmol/L NaCl). In addition, a similar injection of GHRH was given 4 h after the start of a 6-h continuous iv GH infusion (180-micrograms bolus dose, then 3 micrograms/min). During the GH infusions, plasma GH levels reached steady state concentrations in the 9-13 micrograms/L range. The mean GHRH-induced GH response was not significantly blunted during the 4-h infusions of GH [724 +/- 163 (+/- SE) vs. 1184 +/- 373 micrograms.min/L during placebo; P = 0.29], but was significantly inhibited during the 6-h GH infusions (226 +/- 105 micrograms.min/L; P = 0.04 vs. control). Serum IGF-I or plasma glucose did not change significantly throughout the GH infusions. During the 6-h GH infusions, plasma FFA increased to levels significantly above basal values during the last 3 h of the 6-h infusion. These results indicate that short term GH infusion inhibits the plasma GH response to GHRH in a time-dependent manner. The inhibition is not due to changes in circulating IGF-I and glucose concentrations. Fluctuations in hypothalamic somatostatin secretion, changes in lipid or other GH-dependent metabolites, paracrine effects of IGF-I, or a direct effect of GH itself may cause the impaired pituitary responsiveness during short term iv GH infusion.     

Recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I (rhIGF-I) therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: effects on IGFs, IGF-binding proteins, glucose levels and insulin treatment

OBJECTIVE: Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) has both insulin-like and anabolic actions but unlike insulin, IGF-I circulates bound to a number of specific binding proteins that regulate its availability and activity. Patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus have low levels of circulating IGF-I despite increased growth hormone (GH) secretion, and are a group that may benefit from rhIGF-I therapy. Understanding the relationship between IGF-I and its binding proteins is necessary to appreciate the actions of exogenously administered rhIGF-I. Therefore, we examined the effects of 19 days' subcutaneous administration of rhIGF-I (50 micrograms/kg BID) on the levels of IGF-I, IGF-II and the IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs), as well as the daily dose of insulin necessary to maintain glycaemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: This was an open study, and the patients were studied initially while resident (days 1-5) in the hospital and thereafter (days 6-24) as outpatients. Serum was collected at baseline and at intervals throughout the study for the measurement of total IGF-I, IGF-II, IGFBP-1, -2, -3, free insulin and growth hormone (GH). Daily insulin doses and glucometer readings were recorded throughout the study. The changes in each of these variables were examined. The subjects were six adults (35.3 +/- 4.0 years, mean +/- SE), with type 1 diabetes, and all had reasonable glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.2 +/- 0.5%). RESULTS: rhIGF-I administration increased circulating total IGF-I over two-fold (15.3 +/- 1.9 vs. 33.7 +/- 5.4 nmol/l, mean +/- SEM, P < 0.01, day 1 vs. day 20) and decreased plasma IGF-II concentration (85.0 +/- 4.7 vs. 50.6 +/- 4.7 nmol/l, P < 0.01, day 1 vs. day 20). The dose of insulin required for adequate glycaemic control decreased significantly during rhIGF-I therapy (46 +/- 7 vs. 31 +/- 8 U/day, P < 0.05, day -1 vs. day 19), as did the fasting free insulin concentration (8.4 +/- 1.5 vs. 5.0 +/- 0.8 mU/l, P < 0.05, baseline vs. day 5). IGFBP-2 concentration increased (388 +/- 115 vs. 758 +/- 219 micrograms/l, P < 0.05, day 1 vs. day 20), but IGFBP-1 and IGFBP-3 were unchanged during rhIGF-I treatment. Mean nocturnal GH concentration decreased (12.7 +/- 3.3 vs. 3.8 +/- 0.9 mU/l, P = 0.05) after 4 days' rhIGF-I therapy. CONCLUSION: Twice daily rhIGF-I therapy in adults with type 1 diabetes resulted in an increase in circulating IGF-I with a reciprocal decrease in IGF-II, and a marked elevation of IGFBP-2 concentration. The levels of IGFBP-1 and -3 were not dramatically changed despite a reduction in the concentration of serum free insulin, and a large decrease in the requirement for insulin. The mechanisms behind these changes remains unclear but alterations in circulating levels of of IGFBPs may alter IGF-I bioactivity. If rhIGF-I is to have an application in the management of adults with type 1 diabetes, further work is necessary to determine the metabolic consequences of the alterations seen in the IGFs and their binding proteins following rhIGF-I administration.