Phase I trial of oral S-1 combined with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer

The objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of S-1, an oral fluorouracil derivative, combined with gemcitabine, the current standard treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). The subjects were histopathologically proven APC patients with distant metastasis. S-1 was administered orally twice daily each day for 14 days and gemcitabine on days 8 and 15 of each cycle, and this was repeated every 21 days. Doses of each drug were planned as follows: level 1: 800/60, level 2a: 800/80, level 2b: 1000/60, level 3: 1000/80 (gemcitabine (mg m(-2))/S-1 (mg m(-2) day(-1))). In all, 21 patients with APC were enrolled. The main grade 3-4 toxicities observed during first cycle were neutropenia (33%), anaemia (10%), thrombocytopenia (14%) and anorexia (10%). There were no DLT observed in level 1. Three of six patients in level 2a had DLT and this level was considered the MTD. In all, 12 patients in level 2b had no DLT and this level was selected as the recommended dose. Applicable responses were one complete response and nine partial responses (48%). As toxicities were well tolerated and antitumour activities seem to be promising, this combination can be recommended for further phase II studies with APC.     

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) phase I study.

BACKGROUND: The study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (ACA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Pancreatic ACA patients, with previously untreated advanced or metastatic disease, were enrolled in a dose escalation study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. Oxaliplatin was given intravenously on day 1 and gemcitabine intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 3-week cycle. Doses of both drugs were increased with sequential cohorts of patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients were enrolled to three dose levels. DLT of neutropenia and a severe infection was noted at a dose of gemcitabine 1250 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2. Hematological toxicity and nausea and vomiting were the most common grade 3/4 toxicities. The MTD, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2, was well tolerated. Three confirmed responses were seen. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with pancreatic ACA was determined. A phase II study of this combination is ongoing and will be reported separately at a later date.     

卡培他滨二线治疗非小细胞肺癌的剂量递增研究

目的 探讨卡培他滨(capecitabine,CAPE)联合多西紫杉醇(docetaxel,TXT)二线治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)时卡培他滨的最大耐受剂量(maximum-tolerated dose,MTD).方法 应用改良的Fibonacci法给予复治的NSCLC患者递增剂量的CAPE联合固定剂量TXT化疗,剂量Ⅰ(625 mg/m2,每天2次)和剂量Ⅱ(7 50 mg/m2,每天2次),两组1 8例患者共接受了67周期化疗.起始剂量为CAPE625 mg/m2,每天2次,d5～d18,TXT 30 mg/m2,d1,d8,每21天重复.如果没有剂量限制性毒性(dose limiting toxicity,DLT)出现,则升至下一剂量组,直至出现DLT.MTD定义为DLT出现的剂量水平的低一剂量.结果 主要的不良反应为粒细胞减少症、手足综合征、乏力和恶心.全组共5例发生8个DLT,剂量Ⅰ组1个(1例患者),剂量Ⅱ组7个(4例患者).由于在剂量Ⅱ组6例患者中4例出现了DLT,根据定义笔者确定剂量T为MTD.结论 此剂量递增试验的MTD是:卡培他滨1 250 mg/(m2·d)(625 mg/m2,每天2次)联合多西紫杉醇30mg/m2,d1,d8,每21天重复.复治NSCLC患者对此联合方案耐受性良好.     

An EORTC phase I study of capecitabine (Xeloda) in combination with fixed doses of cyclophosphamide and epirubicin (cex) as primary treatment for large operable or locally advanced/inflammatory breast cancer

In breast cancer, chemotherapy regimens that include infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) lead to high response rates, but require central venous access and pumps. To avoid these inconveniences, we substituted infusional 5-FU with capecitabine. The main objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of capecitabine when given in combination with fixed doses of epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (100 and 600 mg/m(2) day 1 every (q) 3 weeks) as primary treatment for large operable or locally advanced/inflammatory breast cancer without distant metastasis. Capecitabine was escalated from 750 mg/m(2) twice a day (bid) to 1250 mg/m(2) bid from day 1 to day 14 in four dose levels. Dose escalation was permitted if 0/3 or 1/6 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). A total of 23 patients were included and 117 courses were administered. At dose level 4, 2 of 2 patients presented DLTs defining the MTD. A high rate of capecitabine treatment modification was required with capecitabine 1050 mg/m(2) bid (dose level 3). 19 patients achieved an objective response (83%). In conclusion, we believe that capecitabine 900 mg/m(2) bid (dose level 2) is the recommended dose in combination with epirubicin 100 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2). The acceptable toxicity profile and encouraging activity of this regimen warrant further evaluation.     

Liposomal cisplatin combined with gemcitabine in pretreated advanced pancreatic cancer patients: a phase I-II study

The present trial is a phase I-II study based on a new liposomal cisplatin (lipoplatin). Previous preclinical and clinical data (phase I pharmacokinetics) led to the investigation of a combined treatment modality involving lipoplatin and gemcitabine. The gemcitabine dose was kept standard at 1000 mg/m2 and the lipoplatin dose was escalated from 25 mg/m2 to 125 mg/m2. The treatment was administered to advanced pretreated pancreatic cancer patients who were refractory to previous chemotherapy which included gemcitabine. Lipoplatin at 125 mg/m2 was defined as dose limiting toxicity (DLT) and 100 mg/m2 as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in combination with 1000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine. Preliminary objective response rate data showed a partial response in 2/24 patients (8.3%), disease stability in 14 patients (58.3%) for a median duration of 3 months (range 2-7 months) and clinical benefit in 8 patients (33.3%). Liposomal cisplatin is a non-toxic alternative agent to bare cisplatin. In combination with gemcitabine, it has an MTD of 100 mg/m2 and shows promising efficacy in refractory pancreatic cancer.     

Concomitant gemcitabine (Gemzar) and extended nodes irradiation in the treatment of pancreatic and biliary carcinoma: a phase I study

BACKGROUND: The rationale for combining cytotoxic agents, such as gemcitabine, and radiotherapy is based on their ability to act as radiation sensitizers and to improve overall response rate. Several studies on pancreatic or biliary carcinoma evaluated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of gemcitabine when combined with irradiation of the macroscopic tumor. However, most of these neoplasms metastasize to the regional lymph nodes. Aim of this report is to determine the MTD of weekly gemcitabine when combined with extended field irradiation (tumor plus nodal irradiation). PATIENTS AND METHOD: 15 patients entered the study. Of these 5 patients were treated with chemoradiation after radical surgical resection. External beam radiation (ERT) was delivered to the tumor (or tumor bed) and regional lymph nodes by using a three-field technique. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 100 mg/m(2) administered as short intravenous infusion once a week. At each dose level 3 patients were treated, and if no grade 3-4 toxicity (considered as dose-limiting toxicity, DLT) was recorded, dose escalation was applied with 50 mg/m(2) increments until the MTD was established. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for acute toxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. No DLT occurred at the first 4 dose levels (100-250 mg/m(2)). At the 5th dose level (300 mg/m(2)), 3 patients experienced DLT: 1 had grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity (painful erosion of gastric mucosa), 1 had uncomplicated grade 3 leukopenia and 1 grade 3 change in liver biochemistry tests. In addition, all 10 unresected patients were evaluated for response, 4 of whom had progressive disease (1 local; 2 distant; 1 local and distant) and 6 had no change. The median follow-up was 21 months. CONCLUSION: Based on this study, the recommended dose for weekly short infusional gemcitabine combined with radiation therapy to the tumor and lymph nodes is 250 mg/m(2). This value is suggestive of a correlation between acute toxicity and inclusion of lymph nodes in the irradiated volume. Moreover, different infusion modalities, as continuous infusion gemcitabine, should be tested more accurately.     

A phase I study of weekly gemcitabine and docetaxel in patients with advanced cancer: a Hoosier Oncology Group Study

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of weekly gemcitabine plus docetaxel, a dose escalation trial of both drugs was developed with each administered weekly for 3 weeks out of 4. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dose levels for gemcitabine (mg/m(2)) and docetaxel (mg/m(2)) were as follows: level 1: 600/25; level 2: 600/35; level 3: 750/35; and level 4: 900/35. Sixteen patients with adequate renal, hepatic, and hematologic function and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were treated. Primary sites included pancreas (12) and others (4). RESULTS: Three patients were treated at each dose level from level 1 through level 4. The dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was neutropenia, the maximum tolerated dose being 750 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine and 35 mg/m(2) of docetaxel. No grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was seen. Three patients had grade 4 neutropenia. Of the 12 patients with pancreatic cancer, 1 had a partial remission and 7 had stable disease with a median duration of 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine and docetaxel can be safely administered weekly at a dose of 750 and 35 mg/m(2), respectively. The DLT was neutropenia. Disease stabilization suggests that this may be an active regimen in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

Radiation therapy and concurrent fixed dose amifostine with escalating doses of twice-weekly gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of twice-weekly gemcitabine (TW-G) when administered in conjunction with fixed dose amifostine (A) during external radiotherapy (RT) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Ten patients with previously untreated, locally advanced, or asymptomatic-metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this study. RT was delivered by using the standard four-field technique (1.8 Gy daily fractions, 45 Gy followed by a boost of 5.4 Gy, in 5-1/2 weeks). The starting dose of TW-G was 60 mg/m(2) (i.v., 30-min infusion), which is equal to the upper limit of previously reported MTD of TW-G when given without A during RT. A was given just before the TW-G, at a fixed dose of 340 mg/m(2) (i.v., rapid infusion). TW-G doses were escalated by 30-mg/m(2) increments in successive cohorts of 3 to 6 additional patients until DLT was observed. Toxicities were graded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria, version 2.0. RESULTS: In general, therapy was well tolerated in patients treated at the first two dose levels of 60 mg/m(2) and 90 mg/m(2). The DLT of TW-G given in conjunction with A during RT were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea/vomiting at the dose level of 120 mg/m(2). Of the 10 patients eligible for a median follow-up of 10 months, 5 remain alive; 1 complete responder, 3 partial responders, and 1 with stable disease. CONCLUSION: A dose of TW-G at a level of 90 mg/m(2) produced tolerable toxicity and it may possess significant activity when delivered in conjunction with 340 mg/m(2) dose of A during RT of the upper abdomen. Due to the higher MTD of TW-G seen in our study, we consider that the A supplementation may optimize the therapeutic index of TW-G-based chemoradiotherapy protocols in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.     

Phase I trial of strictly time-scheduled gemcitabine and cisplatin with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE: Maximal therapeutic gain in xenograft sarcoma and toxicity for jejunal mucosa is time dependent for concurrent gemcitabine and radiotherapy (RT). We used a time-dependent schedule to determine the maximal-tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs; Grade 4 hematologic or Grade 3 other toxicity). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with pancreatic cancer (n = 33), periampullary carcinoma (n = 1), or bile duct cancer (n = 2) were treated with 3-day conformal RT with 50.4 Gy (tumor, lymphatics) plus a 5.4-Gy boost. Concurrent cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/d on Days 1-5 and 29-33) and gemcitabine (initially 600 mg/m(2), weekly on Fridays 68 h before RT) were administered. Because of DLT, the doses were reduced to 500 mg/m(2) weekly and then 500, 400, or 300 mg/m(2) on Days 2, 5, 26, 33. RESULTS: DLT occurred at all dose levels of gemcitabine >300 mg/m(2). Fourteen patients were treated at the recommended Phase II dose of gemcitabine (300 mg/m(2)) without DLT. The response to chemoradiation allowed 10 of 30 initially unresectable patients with primary pancreatic carcinoma to undergo radical surgery, including a complete response in 2 cases. CONCLUSIONS: At the recommended Phase II dose, chemoradiation with gemcitabine and cisplatin can be administered safely in pancreatic carcinoma. However, at higher dose levels, toxicity is severe and frequent. Patients with a chance for conversion to resection could benefit from this schedule.     

Combined-modality therapy with gemcitabine and radiotherapy as a bladder preservation strategy: results of a phase I trial.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I trial of gemcitabine given twice weekly with concurrent radiotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients underwent maximal transurethral resection of their bladder tumors followed by twice-weekly infusion of gemcitabine with 2 Gy/d concurrent radiotherapy to the bladder, for a total of 60 Gy over 6 weeks. The starting dose of gemcitabine was 10 mg/m(2) with subsequent dose levels of 20, 27, 30, and 33 mg/m(2). The primary end point was the determination of the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of twice weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy. Secondary end points included assessment of toxicity associated with combined-modality therapy and initial assessment of the rate of bladder preservation. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled and 23 were assessable for toxicity and response. No significant toxicity was demonstrated at the 10 or 20 mg/m(2) twice-weekly doses. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred in two of three patients treated at 33 mg/m(2). Intermediate dose levels of 27 and 30 mg/m(2) were then evaluated. The MTD of gemcitabine was 27 mg/m(2). The DLT was systemic, manifested as an elevation in liver function tests, malaise, and edema. Fifteen of 23 patients (65%) are alive with bladders intact and no evidence of recurrent disease at a median follow-up of 43 months. CONCLUSION: Twice-weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiotherapy at 2 Gy/d to a total dose of 60 Gy is well-tolerated. The MTD of gemcitabine is 27 mg/m(2). There is a high rate of bladder preservation in this selected group of patients.     

Weekly paclitaxel plus capecitabine in advanced breast cancer patients: dose-finding trial of GOIRC and GOL.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel and capecitabine have demonstrated a synergic effect and significant antitumor activity in patients with advanced breast cancer. A weekly schedule of paclitaxel obtained a response rate of 50-68% in advanced breast cancer and less serious side-effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with chemotherapy were enrolled in a dose-finding trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of paclitaxel given on days 1, 8 and 15 of each cycle combined with capecitabine given twice daily from day 1 through day 14, every 21 days. Three patients were recruited at one of six dose levels (paclitaxel 70-100 mg/m2, capecitabine 1650-2500 mg/m2). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were accrued and 31 were evaluated for toxicity. One DLT has been experienced at level VI as diarrhea grade 3. We determined dose level V as the MTD, but we recommend dose level IV for phase II studies (capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 orally twice daily plus paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 intravenously weekly), owing to cumulative toxicity at level V. The objective response rate was 43%. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel plus capecitabine is a safety and active chemotherapy in previously treated metastatic breast cancer.     

Phase I trial of dose escalation of capecitabine combined with fixed docetaxel in previously treated patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

Capecitabine combined with docetaxel have demonstrated antitumor synergy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Due to absence of phase I trial in China, we conducted this study to define the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of capecitabine with fixed docetaxel for Chinese patients with previously treated NSCLC.

Methods

Previously treated patients with NSCLC were entered into this study. Escalating doses of capecitabine with fixed docetaxel were administered in a modified Fibonacci sequence. The initial doses were capecitabine 625 mg/m², bid, on days d5?Cd18, and docetaxel 30 mg/m² on days 1 and 8, respectively. The regimen was repeated every 21 days. If no dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed, the next dose level was applied. The procedures were repeated until DLT appeared. The MTD was declared to be one dose level below the level at which DLT appeared.

Results

Eighteen patients received 67 cycles at capecitabine of level I (1250 mg/m², divided into 625 mg/m², bid) and level II (1500 mg/m², 750 mg/m², bid). The most common toxicities were neutropenia, hand and feet syndrome, fatigue and nausea. Eight DLTs occurred in 5 patients in the whole group, including 1 DLT in dose level I and 7 DLTs in dose level 2. Since 4 of 6 patients in level II experienced DLTs, we declared thus level I was MTD.

Conclusion

MTD of our phase I trial was capecitabine of 1250 mg/m²/d combined with docetaxel of 30 mg/m²/wk. This combination regimen was well tolerated for previously treated patients with NSCLC. The efficacy of this schedule is currently being further evaluated in a prospective phase II trial.     

Gemcitabine,paclitaxel, and radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a Phase I trial

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities of gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and concurrent radiation for pancreatic cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty patients with locally unresectable pancreatic cancer were studied. The initial dose level was gemcitabine 75 mg/m(2) and paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2) weekly for 6 weeks. Concurrent radiation to 50.4 Gy was delivered in 1.8 Gy fractions. The radiation fields included the primary tumor, plus the regional peripancreatic, celiac, and porta hepatis lymph nodes. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities of diarrhea, dehydration, nausea, and anorexia occurred in 3 of 3 patients at the second dose level of gemcitabine, 150 mg/m(2)/week. An intermediate dose level of gemcitabine, 110 mg/m(2)/week, was added, but gastrointestinal toxicity and pulmonary pneumonitis were encountered. The MTD therefore was gemcitabine 75 mg/m(2)/week with paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2)/week and concurrent radiation. Two of 11 patients treated at the MTD had Grade 3/4 toxicity. Four of 10 assessable patients treated at the MTD responded (40%), including one pathologic complete response. CONCLUSION: The maximum tolerated dosage of gemcitabine is 75 mg/m(2)/week with paclitaxel 40 mg/m(2)/week and conventional 50.4 Gy radiation fields. A Phase II Radiation Therapy Oncology Group study is under way.     

Phase I clinical trial of irinotecan with oral capecitabine in patients with gastrointestinal and other solid malignancies

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of irinotecan and capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors. Thirty-four patients received 122 courses of irinotecan 200 to 300 mg/m(2) as an intravenous infusion during 30 minutes on day 1 and capecitabine 1,500 to 3,000 mg/d orally 12 hours apart starting on day 2 for 14 days, repeated every 21 days (one course). Three to seven patients were treated in six dose-escalation cohorts. Three of 7 (43%) patients treated with irinotecan 300 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 2,300 mg/d had course 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) defining maximum tolerated dosage (MTD). Fatigue and diarrhea were the major DLTs, and other events included neutropenia, anorexia, and hand-foot syndrome. At one dose level below the MTD, none of 7 patients treated with irinotecan 275 mg/m(2), and capecitabine 2,300 mg/d (36 courses) had course 1 DLT. Grade III to IV toxicities beyond course 1 included neutropenia (11% of all courses), fatigue (3.4%) and hand-foot syndrome (3.4%). There were only two episodes of febrile grade II neutropenia. There were no toxic deaths. Transient antitumor response was noted in one patient with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil-refractory colon cancer. The combination of irinotecan 275 mg/m(2) and capecitabine 2,300 mg/d represents a safe, favorable, and convenient outpatient regimen warranting further phase II evaluation.     

A phase I trial of fixed dose rate gemcitabine plus capecitabine in metastatic cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine and gemcitabine given as fixed dose rate (FDR) has not been demonstrated to be well tolerated in phase I previous studies. The goals of this phase I study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose of this combination and to describe the dose-limiting toxic effects (DLT) and the safety profile of this way of administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were eligible for this study. Capecitabine was administered orally at a dose of 650 mg/m(2) bis in die (b.i.d.) for 14 consecutive days. Gemcitabine was administered at FDR of 10 mg/m(2) per min in escalating durations of infusion on days 1 and 8. The cycles were repeated every 21 days. RESULTS: All 20 patients enrolled into the study were assessable for toxicity. Only one out of the first six patients treated at FDR gemcitabine dose of 800 mg/m(2) met protocol-specified DLT criteria (grade 4 neutropenia lasting >or=7 days) during the first two cycles. At these doses the majority of cycles of therapy were, however, delivered without dose reduction or delay. Another similar episode of DLT was observed at the same dose step among the following eight included patients. The dose of FDR gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) in 80 min on days 1 and 8 plus capecitabine 650 mg/m(2) b.i.d., for 14 consecutive days followed by 1 week of rest is recommended for further study. CONCLUSION: The combination of FDR gemcitabine plus capecitabine can be administered with acceptable toxicity. The evidence of antitumor activity deserves further investigation in phase II combination chemotherapy studies.     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of two sequences of gemcitabine and docetaxel administered weekly to patients with advanced cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and effect of drug sequence on toxicities and pharmacokinetics of the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel. METHODS: A total of 34 patients with advanced cancers were treated with gemcitabine and docetaxel on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle according to the following dose escalation schedule: level 1, 800 and 30 mg/m2, respectively; level 2, 800 and 40 mg/m2; level 3, 1,000 and 40 mg/m2; and level 4, 1,250 and 40 mg/m2. At each dose level, at least three patients were assigned to one of the two sequences of drug administration: gemcitabine-->docetaxel or docetaxel-->gemcitabine. Once the MTD had been reached, six additional patients, who had received no more than one chemotherapy regimen, were enrolled to dose levels 3 and 4 (gemcitabine-->docetaxel) to determine the MTD in minimally pretreated patients. RESULTS: Neutropenia was the most frequent DLT with an overall incidence of 23.5%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 62% of patients (8/13) who had received two or more prior chemotherapy regimens, but not at all (0/15) in patients who had received no more than one prior chemotherapy regimens (P< 0.001). Additional DLTs included grade 4 diarrhea and grade 4 stomatitis in one patient each. The MTD was determined to be gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 and docetaxel 40 mg/m2 in patients who had received two or more prior chemotherapy regimens. However, minimally pretreated patients (no more than one prior chemotherapy regimen) were able to tolerate higher doses with an MTD of gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 and docetaxel 40 mg/m2. There were no significant differences in toxicities or pharmacokinetics between the two sequences of administration. Partial and minor responses were observed in 23.5% of patients: non-small-cell lung (two of eight), gastric (two of three), head and neck (one of two), bladder (two of four) and hepatocellular cancer (one of one). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel administered on days 1 and 8 every 21 days was feasible and well tolerated in patients with advanced malignancies. The sequence of administration had no significant effect on the toxicity or pharmacokinetics of either drug. Minimally pretreated patients tolerated higher doses of this combination without significant toxicities. This schedule and combination demonstrated activity in a variety of solid tumors, and merits further evaluation.     

Gemcitabine twice weekly as a radiosensitiser for the treatment of brain metastases in patients with carcinoma: a phase I study

Conventional treatment for brain metastases (BM) is whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Efficacy is poor. It might be increased by a potent radiosensitiser such as gemcitabine which is believed to cross the disrupted blood-brain barrier. Primary objective of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of twice weekly gemcitabine given concurrently with WBRT. Patients with BM from carcinoma were included. The dose of WBRT was 30 Gys (10 daily fractions). Gemcitabine was given 2-4 h prior to WBRT on days 1 and 8 for the first cohort of patients and then on days 1, 4, 8 and 11. Starting dose was 25 mg m(-2), escalated by 12.5 mg m(-2) increments. At least three patients were included per level. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 haematological or grade > or =3 nonhaematological toxicity. A total of 25 patients were included; 74% had a PS 1 (ECOG). In all, 23 had non-small-cell lung cancer, six colorectal, four breast, two renal cell and one oesophageal carcinoma. A total of 92% had concurrent extracranial disease. Six had single BM, 13 had two or three BM and six multiple. Up to 50 mg m(-2) (level 4) no DLT was observed. At 62.5 mg m(-2), one out of six patients developed DLT (thrombocytopenia-bleeding). The next dose level (75 mg m(-2)) was abandoned after grade 4 bone marrow toxicity (fatal neutropenic sepsis) was seen in one out of two patients. So that the dose of 50 mg m(-2) will be taken forward for further study.     

A phase 1 study of fixed dose rate gemcitabine and irinotecan in patients with advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer

BACKGROUND: The combination of a fixed dose rate (FDR) infusion of gemcitabine and irinotecan may have a synergistic effect in the treatment of patients with advanced and metastatic pancreatic and biliary cancer. The current study was conducted to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination. METHODS: There were 32 patients with metastatic pancreatic and advanced unresectable/metastatic biliary adenocarcinoma who were entered into this open-label, phase 1 dose escalation trial. Gemcitabine was administered at an FDR of 10 mg/m(2)/minute intravenously (iv). Irinotecan was administered iv over 60 minutes after gemcitabine. Both gemcitabine and irinotecan were given on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. RESULTS: The MTD of the combination was gemcitabine at an FDR of 1200 mg/m(2) and irinotecan at a dose of 100 mg/m(2). The DLTs were neutropenia and neutropenic fever. Other DLTs included diarrhea, dehydration, and fatigue. Two patients developed deep venous thrombosis during the treatment. The efficacy of the combination was encouraging, even at the lower dose levels. Of 30 assessable patients, there was 1 complete response, 6 partial responses, and 16 patients with stable disease, with a response rate of 23%, a disease control rate of 76%, a median progression-free survival of 4.7 months, and a median overall survival of 7.0 months. The average number of treatment cycles received was 11. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended doses of the combination for future study are gemcitabine at an FDR of 1200 mg/m(2) and irinotecan at a dose of 100 mg/m(2). The efficacy of the combination is encouraging. Further assessment of the combination with or without biologic agents is suggested.     

A phase I trial of nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and capecitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer

Background

Substantial antitumor activity has previously been demonstrated with the addition of nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane [Celgene, Summit, NJ]), an albumin-bound formulation of paclitaxel, to gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Given preclinical evidence of synergy when a fluoropyrimidine is added to gemcitabine plus a taxane in a sequence-specific schedule, we conducted a phase I study to evaluate the combination of nab-paclitaxel, gemcitabine, and capecitabine administered biweekly in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Materials and methods

Patients with previously untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer and an ECOG performance status of 0?C1 were eligible to participate. Study design utilized a 3?+?3 dose-escalation schema, with expanded cohort at maximum-tolerated dose (MTD). Treatment was administered in 14-day cycles, with capecitabine given on days 1?C7 and both gemcitabine (at fixed-dose rate infusion) and nab-paclitaxel on day 4 of each cycle. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) definitions included grade 3?C4 hematologic toxicities and grade 2?C4 hand?Cfoot syndrome, neuropathy, or diarrhea.

Results

Fifteen patients were enrolled across two dose levels. Final MTD was established at nab-paclitaxel 100?mg/m², gemcitabine 750?mg/m², and capecitabine 750?mg/m² twice daily. Patients received a median of four treatment cycles (range 1?C16). The most frequent adverse events (any grade) for the entire study cohort included fatigue, rash/hand?Cfoot syndrome, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, neuropathy, and elevated liver function tests. Ten patients (66.7?%) experienced at least one grade 3?C4 adverse event. Grade 3?C4 hematologic toxicities were uncommon. Two of 14 evaluable patients (14.3?%) exhibited a partial response, and 6 of 12 patients (50?%) with elevated CA19?C9 at baseline had a ??50?% biomarker decline.

Conclusion

While well tolerated overall, this regimen demonstrated only modest antitumor activity in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Recognizing the limits of cross-study comparisons and small sample size, these results do not match those reported at MTD in the phase I/II trial of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel. The lower doses used in the current study suggest that dose intensity may be a critical aspect to optimize multidrug regimens.     

Phase I trial of gemcitabine and carboplatin in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a Groupe Français de Pneumo-Cancérologie Study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of the 21 days carboplatin plus gemcitabine regimen in previously untreated patients with stage IV non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: At least three patients were entered at each dose level. The starting dose was carboplatin AUC 4 mg/ml per min (Area Under the Curve; Calvert formula) on day 1 and gemcitabine 750 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8. Carboplatin was increased to AUC 5 (level 3, 4) then to AUC 6 (level 5-7). Gemcitabine was increased to 875 (level 2, 3), 1000 (level 4, 5), 1250 (level 6) and finally 1500 mg/m(2) (level 7). Twenty-nine patients were entered into this phase I study. RESULTS: At dose level 6, a DLT (grade 4 thrombocytopenia) was observed in one out of six patients. At dose level 7, no DLT was observed during the first course, so the MTD was not reached. During the second course, two out of four patients presented grade 4 thrombocytopenia. None of the five patients receiving two courses at level 6 presented a DLT, so this level was retained for further phase II studies. Of the 25 patients assessable for response, five achieved partial responses with a response rate of 20% (95% CI, 7 to 41%). The median survival time was 7 months and the 1-year survival rate was 24% (95% CI, 9 to 45%). CONCLUSION: The combination of carboplatin given on day 1 and gemcitabine given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks seems to be an acceptable regimen. The DLT consists exclusively of severe thrombocytopenia. Despite the MTD was not reached with carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml per min and gemcitabine 1500 mg/m(2), the recommended dose for further phase II studies is carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml per min and gemcitabine 1250 mg/m(2).