Donor and Recipient IL28B Polymorphisms in HCV‐Infected Patients Undergoing Antiviral Therapy before and after Liver Transplantation

IL28B gene polymorphisms are associated with the response to antiviral therapy in hepatitis C patients. We investigated the influence of IL28B polymorphisms on the response to therapy before and after liver transplantation (LT). Genotyping of SNPs rs8099917 and rs12979860 was performed in 128 HCV‐infected liver transplant recipients and in their donors; all patients underwent antiviral treatment after LT. The prevalence of genotypes rs12979860CC and rs8099917TT was higher in donors than in recipients (50% vs.19%, p < 0.001 and 67% vs. 38%, p < 0.001, respectively). Response to antiviral therapy was significantly higher for recipient genotype rs12979860CC as compared to rs12979860CT/TT both before (100% vs. 48% p = 0.013) and after LT (59% vs. 25% p = 0.002). The figures were almost identical for SNP rs8099917. Sustained virological response after LT was particularly high in patients with favorable recipient and donor genotypes (p < 0.01 for both SNPs). In a subgroup of 34 patients treated while awaiting LT, a favorable donor IL28B genotype was associated with an improved virological response after LT. Our results support a major role of recipient IL28B genotype in the response to antiviral treatment for hepatitis C recurrence. Interestingly, donor genotype also seems to influence the response pattern, especially in recipients who have a favorable IL28B genotype.     

Impact of donor age on survival and fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C undergoing liver transplantation using HCV+ allografts.

Studies have suggested that the use of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive (HCV+) donor allografts has no impact on survival. However, no studies have examined the effect that HCV+ donor histology has upon recipient and graft survival. We evaluated the clinical outcome and impact of histological features in HCV patients transplanted using HCV+ livers. We reviewed all patients transplanted for HCV at our institution from 1988 to 2004; 39 received HCV+ allografts and 580 received HCV-negative (HCV-) allografts. Survival curves compared graft and patient survival. Each HCV+ allograft was stringently matched to a control of HCV- graft recipients. No significant difference in survival was noted between recipients of HCV+ livers and controls. Patients receiving HCV+ allografts from older donors (age > or =50 yr) had higher rates of graft failure (hazard ratio, 2.74) and death rates (hazard ratio, 2.63) compared to HCV- allograft recipients receiving similarly-aged older donor livers. Matched case-control analysis revealed that recipients of HCV+ allografts had more severe fibrosis post-liver transplantation than recipients of HCV- livers (P = 0.008). More advanced fibrosis was observed in HCV+ grafts from older donors compared to HCV+ grafts from younger donors (P = 0.012). In conclusion, recipients of HCV+ grafts from older donors have higher rates of death and graft failure, and develop more extensive fibrosis than HCV- graft recipients from older donors. Recipients of HCV+ grafts, regardless of donor age, develop more advanced liver fibrosis than recipients of HCV- grafts.     

Transplantation of kidneys from HCV-positive donors: a safe strategy?

Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection is the most important cause of liver disease after renal transplantation (RT). The impact of HCV on patient and graft survival after RT remains controversial; however, the great majority of studies with large size and adequate follow-up have shown the detrimental impact of HCV on long-term patient and graft survival after RT. The use of kidneys from anti-HCV positive donors could help decrease the continuing disparity between the number of patients on the transplant waiting list and the number of patients receiving a transplant each year. Single-center experiences have suggested transplanting kidneys from anti-HCV positive donors only in anti-HCV positive dialysis patients. Such practice has not demonstrated any adverse effect on the short-term patient survival; the waiting times for RT were shortened. A better alternative seems to be a policy of transplanting kidneys from anti-HCV positive donors only in HCV RNA positive recipients. This requires HCV RNA testing of all anti-HCV positive dialysis patients awaiting RT. Matching donors and recipients for HCV genotype has been suggested; however, the assessment of donor HCV genotype is currently hampered by time constraints. Recent evidence based on large data base demonstrated that RT recipients of HCV-positive donors are at independent increased risk of mortality; unadjusted 3-year patient survival was 85% versus 93% (P=0.01) in all recipients of donor HCV-positive and HCV-negative kidneys, respectively. This was observed in all recipient subgroups including elderly and HCV-positive recipients. In the near future, rapid nucleic acid testing (NAT) of donors and recipients will allow the assessment of the HCV viremic status in order to maximize organ use. With appropriate informed consent, use of a renal graft from an HCV positive donor may be offered to an HCV infected recipient. Additional studies are needed to clarify the link between donor HCV-positive kidneys and patient mortality.     

Donor graft does not affect the P450 2C19 genotype expressed in peripheral blood in recipients of living donor liver transplantation

Chiu K‐W, Tai W‐C, Nakano T, Tseng H‐P, Cheng Y‐F, Jawan B, Goto S, Chen C‐L. Donor graft does not affect the P450 2C19 genotype expressed in peripheral blood in recipients of living donor liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 830–834. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: The function of cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) is altered in patients with end‐stage liver disease (ESLD) that require liver transplantation (LT). The status of CYP2C19 is of considerable interest because the transplanted healthy donor livers are perfused with the blood of the recipient with ESLD. This study aims to clarify the changes in CYP2C19 in the peripheral blood before and after LT. Thirty pairs of living donors and recipients were enrolled in this study. The CYP2C19 genotype in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was studied immediately before operation in donors, on the day preceding the operation in the unstable recipients, and one month after LT in stable recipients. Limited data suggest that the post‐LT genotype in liver biopsy is the same as donor’s original genotype in most cases (80.0%) and that only 2 patients in the study cohort had the same liver tissue genotype as the respective recipient PBMCs. However, expression of the CYP2C19 genotype after living donor LT (LDLT) was identical to pre‐transplant expression in 100% (30/30) of recipients, i.e., CYP2C19 genotypes in recipient PBMCs did not change after LDLT, suggesting that the donor liver did not render any mutations to the CYP2C19 genotypes after LT.     

The impact of donor age on liver transplantation: influence of donor age on early liver function and on subsequent patient and graft survival.

BACKGROUND: The urgent need to increase the organ donor pool has led to the expansion of criteria for donor selection. The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of donor age on early graft function, subsequent graft loss, and mortality after liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Data on LT were evaluated retrospectively in a population-based cohort of 400 LTs in 348 patients. Of these, 21 (5%) were from donors >70 years old. Pretransplantation donor and recipient characteristics and the evolution of recipients were analyzed. The influence of donor age as a risk factor was assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Actuarial graft survival was 89% at 1 month after LT, 81% after 6 months, and 59% after 60 months. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only donor age (>70 years old) was associated with a higher risk of long-term graft loss (relative risk [RR]=1.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1-1.9; P=0.03) and mortality (RR=1.7, 95% CI=1.2-2.3; P=0.01). Graft survival of septuagenarian livers was 80% at 1 month after LT, 56% after 6 months, and 25% after 54 months. Actuarial survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier curves) also demonstrated worse evolution in recipients of livers from old donors (log-rank test, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced donor age is associated with lower graft and recipient survival.     

Liver,simultaneous liver-kidney,and kidney transplantation from hepatitis C-positive donors in hepatitis C-negative recipients: A single-center study

Transplantation of organs from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-antibody (Ab) and -nucleic acid test (NAT) positive donors into HCV-negative recipients has been proposed to expand the donor pool and shorten waiting times. Data on early single-center outcomes are lacking. Nineteen liver (LT, including seven simultaneous liver-kidney [SLKT]) and 17 kidney transplant (KT) recipients received organs from HCV (+) donors; of these, 13 were HCV NAT (+) in each group. All patients who received organs from HCV NAT (+) donors developed HCV viremia post-transplant except for 2 KT recipients. Patients were treated with a variety of direct-acting antiviral regimens, with high rates of sustained virologic response among those with at least 12 weeks of follow-up past the end of treatment: 12/13 (92%) and 8/8 (100%) among LT/SLKT, and KT recipients. Median time to treatment start was 42 days (interquartile range [IQR] 35-118 days) and 40 days (IQR 26-73) post-LT/SLKT and KT, respectively. One death occurred in a SLKT recipient unrelated to HCV or its treatment. There was no significant increase in rejection, proteinuria, or changes in immunosuppression in any group. Organs from HCV-viremic donors can be utilized for HCV-uninfected recipients with good short-term outcomes.     

Successful Lung Transplantation From Hepatitis C Positive Donor to Seronegative Recipient

Lung transplantation using RNA+ hepatitis C (HCV+) donors to seronegative recipients is not currently performed due to the very high risk of transmission. Previous reports have shown poor survival when this practice was applied. The emergence of new direct‐acting antiviral drugs (DAA) suggests a high chance of sustained virologic response in immunocompetent patients. We report here successful transplantation of lungs from HCV+ donor to HCV? recipient. The recipient was an HCV? patient with chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Viral transmission occurred early posttransplant but excellent clinical outcomes were observed including elimination of HCV after 12 weeks of treatment using DAAs.     

The impact of donor race on recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Background

Several studies have demonstrated mixed results regarding the influence of donor race on patient and graft survival in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplant. However, few studies have looked at the impact of donor race on recurrent HCV. This study is a retrospective analysis of the influence of patient and donor race on the severity of recurrent HCV at a single center.

Methods

Of patients transplanted at our center between 2000 and 2006, 222 were infected with HCV. Of these, 165 were eligible to be evaluated for recurrent HCV after transplant. We excluded those with patient and graft loss within 1 year that was not related to recurrent HCV, patients with advanced fibrosis from other causes, those who did not undergo posttransplant liver biopsy, and those lost to follow-up.Patients were given a recurrent HCV score of 1, 2, or 3. A score of 1 was assigned if the patient had no more than mild portal fibrosis at 1 year and no bridging fibrosis at any point. A score of 2 was defined as moderate portal fibrosis or focal bridging fibrosis at 1 year or bridging fibrosis or cirrhosis after 3 years. A score of 3 was defined as bridging fibrosis, cirrhosis, or graft loss from HCV within 3 years. Baseline characteristics including donor and recipient age, race, sex, body mass index, ischemia time, hypertension, and diabetes were recorded. Analysis was performed with ordinal multivariate logistic regression modeling.

Results

Of the 165 patients with a recurrent HCV score, 105 (64%) had a score of 1, 29 patients (17%) had a score of 2, and 31 patients (19%) had a score of 3. In all, 132 recipients (80%) had white donors, and 26 (16%) had African American donors, 115 patients (70%) were white and 40 (24%) were African American. The mean recurrent HCV scores for the patient donor and recipient race combinations are as follows: white donor and white recipient, 1.54; white donor and African American recipient, 1.89; African American donor and white recipient, 1.18; and African American donor and African American recipient, 1.23. Having a white donor also significantly associated with a higher recurrent HCV score regardless of recipient race (odds ratio 2.93, P = .044) in African American patients, having a white donor had an odds ratio of 4.62 (P = .046). After adjusting for donor age and sex and patient age and sex, having a white donor was still found to be associated with a higher recurrent HCV score (4.48, P = .0275) on multivariate analysis. For all 222 patients, donor race was not associated with overall patient and graft survival.

Conclusion

Patients receiving white donor grafts had significantly worse recurrent HCV than those receiving grafts from African American donors regardless of recipient race. This difference was especially marked in African American recipients and persisted on multivariate analysis. These data suggest a graft from a white donor is potentially one more important variable in identifying patients at risk for more aggressive recurrent HCV after orthotopic liver transplant.     

Results of Renal Transplant From Deceased Anti-hepatitis C Virus Donors,Poland 1998-2012

Kidney transplant (KTx) is the best method of renal insufficiency treatment. In dialyzed patients, mortality rises with the time on dialysis. There is a continuing shortage of organs for transplantation, hence a propensity to expand the donor pool with expanded-criteria donors, anti-hepatitis C virus-positive included. In the above case a transmission of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype to recipient is present. It has been proven that contamination with more than 1 HCV genotype did not worsen KTx outcomes. There are 2.6% anti-HCV(+) donors in Poland. Use is only possible in cases of anti-HCV(+) and anti-HCV RNA(+) recipients.

Hepatitis C–associated focal proliferative glomerulonephritis in an aviremic recipient of a hepatitis C–positive antibody donor liver

Shortage of organs for liver transplantation (LT) and the availability of highly efficient pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) against hepatitis C virus (HCV) have allowed the use of livers from HCV-positive antibody/negative nucleic acid test donors (dHCV Ab+/NAT−) into aviremic HCV recipients over the last few years. We report the case of a patient who received an LT from an HCV Ab+/NAT− donor and, after HCV viremic conversion, developed a nephrotic syndrome due to a focal proliferative glomerulonephritis early after LT. Patient's renal function and proteinuria resolved after successful treatment with DAAs. Renal and hepatic function remain normal over 24 months of follow-up. This case restates the success of LT using livers from dHCV Ab+/NAT− in aviremic recipients in the context of DAAs while illustrating the risk for potential complications associated with the HCV transmission and reinforcing the importance of early initiation of anti-HCV therapy.     

The outcome of liver grafts procured from hepatitis C-positive donors

BACKGROUND: The growing prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in the general population has resulted in an increased frequency of potential organ donors that carry the virus. The survival of grafts from HCV+ donors has not been studied in detail. METHODS: Two study populations were examined retrospectively to assess the survival of liver grafts procured from HCV+ donors. First, we evaluated the survival of all 13 HCV+ and 103 HCV- grafts that were transplanted at our institution to HCV+ recipients from January 1, 1995 to December 31, 1999. In parallel, we analyzed a subset of the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) liver transplant database from the same 5-year time period that was comprised of 14,195 adult patients for whom donor and recipient HCV serologies were known. Kaplan-Meier graft survival for both patient populations was calculated based on donor and recipient HCV serologic status. A Cox proportional hazards analysis was performed on UNOS data to identify variables independently predicting graft survival. RESULTS: For transplants performed at our institution, we found no statistically significant difference in the Kaplan-Meier graft survival of HCV+ and HCV- grafts transplanted to HCV+ recipients (P=0.68). The incidence of biopsy-proven, recurrent HCV posttransplant was similar in recipients receiving either HCV+ or HCV- grafts (4/13 vs. 18/103, chi-square P=0.211). Analysis of UNOS data revealed that the survival of HCV+ grafts in HCV+ recipients was equivalent to the survival of HCV- grafts in HCV+ recipients. Unexpectedly, the survival of grafts in HCV+ recipients in general was significantly inferior to that of grafts in HCV- recipients. Multivariate analysis of all patients found recipient but not donor HCV status to be independently predictive of graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of data from a single center and the national UNOS database suggests that transplantation of liver allografts from HCV+ donors to HCV+ recipients results in graft survival comparable to HCV- grafts transplanted to HCV+ recipients. In contrast, recipient HCV positivity is an independent predictor of graft failure compared with patients transplanted for other causes of liver disease.     

Long-term results and modeling to predict outcomes in recipients with HCV infection: results of the NIDDK liver transplantation database.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated liver disease is the most common indication for liver transplantation (LT). There are, however, no long-term (>5 year) studies of comparative outcomes for recipients with HCV infection, and no models capable of identifying recipients with HCV infection at greatest risk for adverse outcomes. We prospectively determined: 1) long-term outcomes, and 2) whether pretransplant patient or donor variables can be used to predict death and/or graft loss in recipients with HCV infection. A total of 165 HCV-infected recipients were eligible for this study. Pretransplant donor and recipient characteristics and patient and graft survival data were prospectively collected. Model building for outcomes was carried out using logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic curves for different models were created and compared. Median follow-up was 8.5 years. Adjusted 10 year graft survival was 64% for recipients with HCV infection and 51% for uninfected recipients. A model incorporating pretransplant HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA), cytomegalovirus immunoglobulin (CMV IgG) serostatus, creatinine, bilirubin, prothrombin time international ratio (INR), recipient age, and donor age was developed to identify recipients at greatest risk of short-term mortality or graft loss (area under receiver operating characteristic curve = .83) In conclusion, long-term outcomes following LT for recipients with HCV infection are comparable to those for recipients undergoing LT for other indications. HCV-infected recipients at greatest risk for short-term mortality and graft loss can be identified using several readily identifiable pretransplant variables. Long-term death and graft loss specifically secondary to recurrence of HCV appears, however, to be determined primarily by factors other than those included in this analysis.     

Results of live donor liver transplantation in patients with hepatitic C virus infection: the HCV 3 trial experience

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the most common disease indication for liver transplantation (LT). Outcomes are compromised by near universal recurrence of HCV. A prospective multi-center randomized study to evaluate immunosuppressive strategies in HCV+ transplant recipients provided the opportunity to assess impact of live donor (LD) LT. Two hundred and ninety-five patients undergoing LT for HCV (260 deceased donor [DD] recipients/35 LD recipients), randomized to three regimens, were followed for two yr for patient and graft survival and rate and severity of recurrent HCV. Biopsies were performed at baseline, 3, 12, and 24 months. One- and two-yr patient survival for LD recipients was 88.1% and 81.1% vs. 90.5% and 84.6% for DD recipients (p = 0.5665). One- and two-yr graft survival for LD recipients was 82.9% and 76.2% vs. 87.9% and 81.7% for DD recipients (p = 0.3921). Recurrent HCV did not account for more deaths or graft losses in the LD recipients. In this prospective study, controlled for immunosuppression, use of LD organs did not increase the rate or severity of HCV recurrence. The more elective nature of LDLT affords an opportunity to manipulate donor and recipient factors that can impact upon outcomes.     

Liver transplantation from old donors into HCV and non-HCV recipients

BACKGROUND: Chronic liver failure due to HCV-related cirrhosis is the leading indication for liver transplantation in Western countries. Inferior long-term results have been reported for liver transplantation in HCV patients, especially when marginal donor livers are utilized. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze the outcome of liver transplantation from elderly donors in HCV versus non-HCV recipients. METHODS: One hundred seventy-nine patients receiving 204 liver transplantations were divided into four groups according to HCV positivity and donor age (> or <65 years). Long-term survivals were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Grafts from donors of >65 years into HCV-positive patients displayed lower patient and graft survival rates than HCV-negative cases, although macrosteatosis was more frequent (55% vs 9%, P =.02) among organs used for non-HCV cases. Moreover, HCV-positive recipients transplanted with a donor aged >65 years had significantly lower patient and graft survival (40% vs 78% [P =.01] and 40% vs 68% [P =.06], respectively) than patients receiving a liver from a younger donor. CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective analysis, although hampered by a small number of patients transplanted with an old liver, suggest that the results of liver transplantation with a donor graft >65 years of age into an HCV-positive recipient shows a worse outcome than those from younger donors. Older livers should be reserved for non-HCV cases.     

Hepatitis C virus in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from a chronically infected patient receiving liver graft from infected donor

BACKGROUND: In hepatitis C virus (HCV)-positive patients receiving HCV-positive liver allografts either the donor or recipient strain overtakes the other strain. Whether these changes are reflected in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-associated virus is unknown. METHODS: We analyzed by single-strand conformation polymorphism and sequencing HCV RNA from serum and PBMCs from a liver transplant recipient whose indigenous strain was replaced by the donor strain. RESULTS: Only the recipient strain was detectable in serum and PBMCs 3 and 5 days after transplantation; at day 7 and 8, a mixture of both was present in the PBMCs, but only recipient strain was detectable in serum. This coincided with the peak presence of donor DNA in recipient PBMCs. From day 14 on, HCV sequences in serum and PBMCs were indistinguishable. CONCLUSIONS: Overtake phenomenon in the setting of liver transplantation from infected donors to infected recipients is manifested in PBMCs. Cells released from infected graft carry donor HCV strain.     

Hepatitis C virus genotyping of organ donor samples to aid in transplantation of HCV‐positive organs

Given the availability of new highly efficacious anti‐HCV therapies, some clinicians have advocated for wider use of kidneys from hepatitis C virus‐positive (HCV+) donors, including transplanting them into HCV‐negative recipients. As treatment regimens for HCV are commonly guided by genotype, pretransplant HCV genotyping of tissue donors would be beneficial. To our knowledge, donor HCV genotyping has never been reported. We retrieved archived frozen plasma samples for 17 previous organ donors through a local organ procurement organization. We performed HCV genotyping using the eSensor HCVg Direct Test (GenMark Diagnostics) and also by Sanger sequencing, for confirmation (Retrogen). In addition, viral loads were measured using the COBAS AmpliPrep/TaqMan system (Roche Diagnostics). We found that most of the samples (n = 14) were HCV Genotype 1a with the remainder being Genotype 2b (n = 1) or Genotype 3 (n = 2). All genotyping results were concordant with Sanger sequencing. The average HCV viral load in the sample group was ~ 1.6 million IU/mL (range: ~16 000 IU/mL to 7 million IU/mL). We demonstrate that viral RNA from organ donor plasma can be successfully genotyped for HCV. This ability suggests that transplantation of HCV+ kidneys into HCV‐negative recipients, followed by genotype‐guided antiviral therapy, could be feasible.     

Hepatitis B and C virus infections transmitted through organ transplantation investigated by CDC,United States, 2014‐2017

We evaluated clinical outcomes among organ recipients with donor‐derived hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections investigated by CDC from 2014 to 2017 in the United States. We characterized new HBV infections in organ recipients if donors tested negative for total anti‐HBc, HBsAg and HBV DNA, and new recipient HCV infections if donors tested negative for anti‐HCV and HCV RNA. Donor risk behaviors were abstracted from next‐of‐kin interviews and medical records. During 2014‐2017, seven new recipient HBV infections associated with seven donors were identified; six (86%) recipients survived. At last follow‐up, all survivors had functioning grafts and five (83%) had started antiviral therapy. Twenty new recipient HCV infections associated with nine donors were identified; 19 (95%) recipients survived. At last follow‐up, 18 (95%) survivors had functioning grafts and 14 (74%) had started antiviral treatment. Combining donor next‐of kin interviews and medical records, 11/16 (69%) donors had evidence of injection drug use and all met Public Health Service increased risk donor (IRD) criteria. IRD designation led to early diagnosis of recipient infection, and prompt implementation of therapy, likely reducing the risk of graft failure, liver disease, and death.     

One-year protocol liver biopsy can stratify fibrosis progression in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C infection.

Determinants of progression to cirrhosis in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection have been well described in the immunocompetent population but remain poorly defined in liver transplant (LT) recipients. This cohort study determines the factors contributing to the development of fibrosis and its rate of progression in the allograft. Predictive factors analyzed include: demographics, host and donor factors, surgery-related variables (cold and warm ischemia time), rejection episodes, cytomegalovirus infection (CMV), and immunosuppression. Over 12 years, 842 adult LTs were performed at our institution; 358 for the indication of HCV. A total of 264 patients underwent protocol liver biopsies at month 4 and yearly after LT. Using the modified Knodell system of Ishak for staging fibrosis, the median fibrosis progression rate was .8 units/year (P < .001). Rapid fibrosis progression (> .8 units/year) was best identified by liver histology performed at 1 year. Donor age > 55 years was associated with rapid fibrosis progression and development of cirrhosis (P < .001). In contrast, donor age < 35 years was associated with slower progression of fibrosis (P = .003). Risk factors for graft loss due to recurrent HCV included recipient age > 35 years (P = .01), donor age > 55 years (P = .005), and use of female donor allografts (P = .03). In conclusion, fibrosis progression in HCV-infected LT recipients occurs at a rate of .8 units/year. Increased donor age has a major impact on disease progression, graft failure, and patient survival. A liver biopsy performed at 1 year posttransplant can help identify those patients more likely to develop progressive disease and may allow better targeting of antiviral therapy.     

The marginal donor: a single-center experience in orthotopic liver transplantation

The use of marginal donors has become more common worldwide due to the sharp increase in recipients with a consequent shortage of suitable organs. The definition of "marginal donor" has not been reached by all centers. We herein analyzed our single-center experience over the last 3 years in liver transplantation (OLT) to evaluate the outcomes of using a high percentage of so-called "marginal donors", according to the current classification from the National (Italian) Center of Transplantation (CNT). Among the 78 OLT performed in 77 patients from January 1, 2003 to October 31, 2005, donor livers were divided into three groups according to the CNT classification. We evaluated donor variables, cold ischemia time (CIT), warm ischemia time (WIT), MELD score, and length of hospital stay. Histologic graft steatosis was correlated with estimated steatosis by ultrasound. There were no differences among the three graft recipient groups concerning CIT, WIT, MELD score, and the length of hospital stay. Steatosis is indicated in all series as a definite variable for a higher risk of postoperative mortality. CIT is necessarily related to donor retrieval policy and organization. Donor age seemed also to be related to a possible increase in postoperative mortality, but there are significant variations in the definition of the age limit. We failed to observe a correlation between a higher mortality rate and any of the variables currently listed to define a "marginal donor." A shorter CIT seemed to positively influence the role played by the other variables identifying a "marginal liver." Finally, the use of HCV(+) or HBV(+) grafts did not lead to an increased mortality.