Mentored retroperitoneal laparoscopic renal surgery in children: a safe approach to learning

OBJECTIVE: To review the feasibility of introducing advanced retroperitoneal renal laparoscopic surgery (RRLS) to a paediatric urology division, using the mentorship-training model. Although the scope of practice in paediatric urology is currently adapting endoscopic surgery into daily practice, most paediatric urologists in North America have had no formal training in laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: The study included four paediatric urologists with 3-25 years of practice; none had had any formal laparoscopic training or ever undertaken advanced RRLS. An experienced laparoscopic surgeon (the mentor) assisted the learning surgeons over a year. The initial phases of learning incorporated detailed lectures, visualization through videotapes and 'hands-on' demonstration by the expert in the technique of the standardized steps for each type of surgery. Over 10 months, ablative and reconstructive RRLS was undertaken jointly by the surgeons and the mentor. After this training the surgeons operated independently. To prevent lengthy operations, conversion to open surgery was planned if there was no significant progression after 2 h of laparoscopic surgery. RESULTS: Over the 10 months of mentorship, 36 RRLS procedures were undertaken in 31 patients (28 ablative and eight reconstructive). In all cases the mentored surgeons accomplished both retroperitoneal access and the creation of a working space within the cavity. The group was able to initiate ablative RRLS but the mentor undertook all the reconstructive procedures. After the mentorship period, over 10 months, 12 ablative procedures were undertaken independently, and five other attempts at RRLS failed. CONCLUSION: Although the mentored approach can successfully and safely initiate advanced RRLS in a paediatric urology division, assessing the laparoscopic practice pattern after mentorship in the same group of trainees is warranted. Ablative RRLS is easier to learn for the experienced surgeon, but reconstructive procedures, e.g. pyeloplasty, require a high degree of skill in laparoscopic technique, which may only be acquired through formal training focusing primarily on suturing techniques.     

Exciting times: towards a totally minimally invasive paediatric urology service

Following on from the first paediatric laparoscopic nephrectomy in 1992, the growth of minimally invasive ablative and reconstructive procedures in paediatric urology has been dramatic. This article reviews the literature related to laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty, optimising posterior urethral valve ablation and intravesical laparoscopic ureteric reimplantation.     

Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Robotic surgery for ureteropelvic junction obstruction is an evolving technique. We review the current literature related to this technique and discuss the current technique and outcomes of robotic pyeloplasty. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent advances in robotic-assisted surgery have allowed the successful completion of complex reconstructive procedures in the pediatric population, including the robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty can be performed by either a transperitoneal or a retroperitoneal approach. Overall, the procedure is safe, efficacious, and may have particular benefits over open surgery. SUMMARY: The evolution of laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology has been limited by the challenge of laparoscopic suturing. Robotic systems may offer the means to overcome this major impediment of laparoscopic surgery. The results of this review demonstrate that robotic-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty is safe, technically feasible, and efficacious in the pediatric population, and may be comparable to a contemporary series of open pyeloplasty. As the technology continues to evolve, the efficiency of the robotic system is likely to improve; however, the ultimate role of robotic-assisted or computer-assisted surgical systems remains unclear. To further determine the role of robotic systems in the management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction, rigorous prospective research is needed that combines surgical and technical outcomes with overall subjective or cosmetic outcome and economic analysis.     

Role of laparoscopy for reconstructive urology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Laparoscopic reconstructive urology is a challenging and technically demanding field of urology. As urologists' experience strengthened and technical modifications developed, urologic laparoscopy was applied in the treatment of malignancies and evolved from simple to technically demanding reconstructive techniques. This article reviews the latest published literature in the field of laparoscopic reconstructive urology and introduces our own persuasion for the role of this approach in urology. RECENT FINDINGS: Some laparoscopic procedures like orchidopexy, ureterolithotomy, pyelolithotomy and pyeloplasty require "a middle class level of laparoscopic skills" whereas other reconstructive techniques such as radical prostatectomy and cystectomy and partial nephrectomy are technically demanding and are still being developed with promising results. The reconstructive part of partial nephrectomy is small and refers to good hemostasis whereas in radical prostatectomy and cystectomy, the reconstructive part--urethrovesical anastomosis and urinary diversion, respectively--is an important factor, affecting the patient's postoperative quality of life. SUMMARY: The development of new instrumentation as well as the amelioration of urologists' laparoscopic skills will pave the way for the establishment of laparoscopic reconstructive urology in everyday practice. So far, laparoscopic reconstructive urology seems to be a well tolerated and effective treatment modality but still with not a completely clear role.     

Laparoscopic and robotic approach to genitourinary anomalies in children

The evolution of laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology has been long and slow, but is emerging steadily and seems to be here to stay. This article reviews the basic applications of laparoscopic methods in pediatric urology, including diagnostic and operative procedures.The new horizons of robotic assistance for laparoscopic surgery make highly accurate and efficient reconstructive procedures possible.     

The position of laparoscopic surgery in pediatric urology

With growing experience in laparoscopic techniques there is a switch in pediatrics from ablative surgery to reconstructive procedures. Besides the established procedures such as laparoscopic nephrectomy and orchidopexy, procedures like heminephrectomy and pyeloplasty have proven practicable and become standard therapies in children and infants. Due to technical advances, as shown for our own patients, the number of treated infants is still increasing. However, laparoscopic reconstructive procedures presuppose a good deal of experience in preparation and suture techniques, and remain reserved for centers with daily experience in laparoscopy. Daily experience with difficult urological laparoscopic procedures in adults will remain more common than in pediatric centres.     

Robotic paediatric urology

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Robot assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) is slowly gaining acceptance in the field of paediatric urology. Accumulating data on safety and efficacy when performing paediatric robotic urologic procedures has led paediatric urologists to gradually embrace increasingly more complex reconstructive surgeries. Indeed, the unique and delicate movements generated by the robotic system make this technology ideal for children who often require reconstructive procedures. We critically review the current role of RALS in paediatric urology and to analyse the published data, with a special emphasis on the most common applications. We also propose a structured plan to expedite training and the surgical ‘learning curve’.

OBJECTIVES

• ? To critically review the current role of robot‐assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) in paediatric urology and to analyse the published data, with a special emphasis on the most common applications.
• ? One of the greatest benefits of RALS has been the ability to truly spread the application of minimally invasive surgery to paediatric surgical patients. The unique attributes of the robotic interface make this technology ideal for children with congenital anomalies, who often require reconstructive procedures.
• ? We also propose a structured plan to expedite training and the surgical ‘learning curve’.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• ? Currently, almost all urological surgical procedures in children have been performed with the assistance of the robotic interface.
• ? The most commonly performed procedures include pyeloplasty, nephrectomy/hemi‐nephrectomy and surgery for vesico‐ureteric reflux.
• ? Initial series of bladder augmentation and appendicovesicostomy are available.

RESULTS

• ? Initial results with RALS are encouraging and have shown safety similar to open procedures, and outcomes at least equivalent to standard laparoscopy.
• ? Accumulating data have consistently shown that postoperative analgesia requirements and overall hospital stay are decreased.
• ? However, operative durations are significantly longer than their open counterparts, but this is decreasing as experience accumulates.

CONCLUSIONS

• ? RALS is already part of paediatric urological surgery.
• ? Larger single‐institution case series and comparative studies with the open approach and multi‐institutional meta‐analyses will help to identify the benefits of RALS in paediatric urology.

     

泌尿外科腹腔镜手术的进展

泌尿外科腹腔镜手术开展已有十余年，随着手术方式的不断改进以及腔镜技术的日益完善，目前大部分切除和重建手术已可以应用腹腔镜来完成。一些技术已经成熟并定型，一些正处于不断的完善中，还有一些尚存在争议。本对泌尿外科腹腔镜手术的手术方式、适应证方面的进展以及新出现的技术进行综述。     

Robotic renal surgery: pyeloplasty

The treatment of ureteropyelic junction (UPJ) obstruction offers a perfect sketch of the parallel evolution of the availability of technology and changes in surgical proceedings. From the open Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty, passing through percutaneous or retrograde endopyelothomy with various instruments, to the laparoscopic approach, technology and human talent have found a field for development in this reconstructive procedure. Robotic surgery is young and starts to define its role in urology surgery. There are established procedures such as radical prostatectomy; it remains to be established what operations will benefit from the robotic technology, so results are under continuous evaluation. The non stopping advance of computer technology guarantees future achievements of robotic technology. The objective is to achieve that surgeons could perform difficult surgical procedures with a level of accuracy and clinical results that would be difficult to achieve with conventional methods. We analyze the technical features, results and comparative studies of the robotic pyeloplasty from the medical literature. Robotic surgery has demonstrated its usefulness in the performance of pyeloplasties, with good results in primary and secondary UPJ stenosis in children and adults, in various aetiologies. Robotics enables to diminish the difficulties of intracorporeal suture and the learning curve for surgeons without laparoscopic experience. Nevertheless, although initial clinical experience with robotic pyeloplasty is favourable, continuous evaluation of results is necessary to determine if the surgical procedure is as effective in the long-term as laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty.     

Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery has revolutionized the concept of minimally invasive surgery for the last 3 decades. Robotic-assisted surgery is one of the latest innovations in the field of minimally invasive surgery. Already, many procedures have been performed in urology, cardiac surgery, and general surgery. In this article, we attempt to report our preliminary experience with robotic-assisted laparoscopy in a variety of gynecological surgeries. We sought to evaluate the role of robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgeries. METHODS: The study was a case series of 15 patients who underwent various gynecologic surgeries for combined laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery. The da Vinci robot was used in each case at a tertiary referral center for laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. An umbilicus, suprapubic, and 2 lateral ports were inserted. These surgeries were performed both using laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic techniques. The assembly and disassembly time to switch from laparoscopy to robotic-assisted surgery was measured. Subjective advantages and disadvantages of using robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgeries were evaluated. RESULTS: Fifteen patients underwent a variety of gynecologic surgeries, such as myomectomies, treatment of endometriosis, total and supracervical hysterectomy, ovarian cystectomy, sacral colpopexy, and Moskowitz procedure. The assembly time to switch from laparoscopy to robotic-assisted surgery was 18.9 minutes (range, 14 to 27), and the disassembly time was 2.1 minutes (range, 1 to 3). Robotic-assisted laparoscopy acts as a bridge between laparoscopy and laparotomy but has the disadvantage of being costly and bulky. CONCLUSION: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgeries have advantages in providing a 3-dimensional visualization of the operative field, decreasing fatigue and tension tremor of the surgeon, and added wrist motion for improved dexterity and greater surgical precision. The disadvantages include enormous cost and added operating time for assembly and disassembly and the bulkiness of the equipment.     

Laparoscopic surgery in urology: Taining and education

Relatively long learning curves and, therefore, initially longer operating times compared to conventional procedures are still a matter of debate. Today, there are numerous possibilities for learning laparoscopic techniques and establishing one's own laparoscopic programs, including various pelvitrainers and virtual reality computer programs. One useful and realistic way involves "wet lab" training programs for ablative and reconstructive procedures using the pig model. Today, laparoscopic urological surgery includes procedures with low (e.g. laparoscopy for undescended testicles), intermediate (laparoscopic pyeloplasty) and high level (laparoscopic/endoscopic prostatectomy) complexity. Therefore, laparoscopy should be an integral part of training in urology. A defined number of possibly multi-institutional training centers with well structured educational programs are needed. The main goal should be the standardization of surgical procedures as well as educational training programs in order to shorten individual learning curves and generate common quality standards.     

Laparoskopische Chirurgie in der Urologie

Relatively long learning curves and, therefore, initially longer operating times compared to conventional procedures are still a matter of debate. Today, there are numerous possibilities for learning laparoscopic techniques and establishing one’s own laparoscopic programs, including various pelvitrainers and virtual reality computer programs. One useful and realistic way involves “wet lab” training programs for ablative and reconstructive procedures using the pig model. Today, laparoscopic urological surgery includes procedures with low (e.g. laparoscopy for undescended testicles), intermediate (laparoscopic pyeloplasty) and high level (laparoscopic/endoscopic prostatectomy) complexity. Therefore, laparoscopy should be an integral part of training in urology. A defined number of possibly multi-institutional training centers with well structured educational programs are needed. The main goal should be the standardization of surgical procedures as well as educational training programs in order to shorten individual learning curves and generate common quality standards.     

Short-term impact of a laparoscopic "mini-residency" experience on postgraduate urologists' practice patterns

BACKGROUND: To assist practicing urologists incorporate laparoscopic urology into their practice, a 5-day mini-residency (M-R) program with a mentor, preceptor, and proctor experience was established at the University of California, Irvine, and we report the initial results. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-two urologists underwent laparoscopic ablative (n=17) or laparoscopic reconstructive (n=15) training, including inanimate model skills training, animal laboratory, and operating room observation. A questionnaire was mailed 1 to 15 months (mean, 8 months) after their M-R program, and responses were reviewed. RESULTS: A 100% response rate was achieved. The mean M-R participant age was 49 years (range 31 to 70 years). The majority of the participants (72%) had laparoscopic experience during residency training and had performed between 5 and 15 laparoscopic cases before attending the M-R program. Within 8 months after M-R, 26 participants (81%) were practicing laparoscopic surgery. Participants were performing laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (p=0.008), nephroureterectomy (p<0.0005), and pyeloplasty (p=0.008) at substantially higher rates after training. At the same time, fewer of the M-R participants were performing hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery after training (p=0.008) compared with before the M-R. Ninety-two percent of the participants indicated that they would recommend this training program to a colleague. CONCLUSIONS: A 5-day intensive laparoscopic ablative and reconstructive surgery course seems to encourage postgraduate urologists, already familiar with laparoscopy, to successfully expand the scope of their procedures to include more complex laparoscopic techniques such as nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy, and pyeloplasty into their clinical practice.     

Das moderne Berufsbild der Urologen

The field of urology is in the process of transition: as a result of continuing advances in surgical methods, the change from open to endoscopic and laparoscopic operations to the point of robotic-assisted surgical procedures, urological operations are being revolutionized. This represents both a challenge and an opportunity for urology of the future. The author outlines the coming perspectives in our discipline.     

Laparoscopic surgeries for the bladder

Various reparative, reconstructive, extirpative, and miscellaneous surgeries of the bladder with laparoscopic techniques are in the process of evolution. Our increasing expertise enhanced by improved instrumentation make these procedures feasible and encourage us to venture into this relatively less explored arena of laparoscopic urology.     

Is open surgery for partial nephrectomy an obsolete surgical procedure?

During the past few years, the indications for laparoscopic surgery in urology have extended from simple ablative procedures towards more complex reconstructive and organ-preserving interventions. Among them, transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy have been successfully performed for both benign and malignant lesions. However, this approach raises specific problems because in contrast to other laparoscopic procedures the techniques and tools used during open surgery can not be simply transposed to laparoscopy. The absence of surface hypothermia, the lack of manual palpation, difficulties of vascular control and reconstruction of the collecting system necessitate new solutions readily adaptable to laparoscopic surgery. However, the available series comprise only a few cases, and there are differences in techniques and instrumentation in almost every operation. In these circumstances, it is too early to consider this new approach as reproducible and ready to be used elsewhere than in specialized centres. Although the feasibility and good results of partial nephrectomy for benign conditions and small exophitic tumours is now well documented, the development of new surgical tools and standardization of methodology are required for more complex cases within the scope of well conceived prospective studies.     

Straight-arm positioning and port placement for pediatric robotic-assisted laparoscopic renal surgery

Minimally invasive procedures are gaining in popularity for application in reconstructive surgeries of the kidney in children. The use of robotic assistance for these laparoscopic procedures is an emerging option. Here, we describe our straight-arm positioning technique, which serves as a simple and effective alternative to classic flank positioning in pediatric renal cases, and the associated port placement strategies for these robotic-assisted laparoscopic reconstructive renal procedures.     

Minimally invasive surgery for urologic disease in children

This article is a comprehensive review of the current indications and recent literature pertaining to laparoscopic techniques in pediatric urology. Basic concepts such as instrumentation, anesthetic considerations, and complications are reviewed. Specific techniques and indications are also explored. As the field of pediatric urology continues to expand, it still lags behind adult urology. With improvements in technology, however, and with new surgeons entering the field with a basic laparoscopic background, pediatric urologic laparoscopy continues to progress. Currently, procedures such as laparoscopic exploration for undescended testicles and laparoscopic nephrectomy are accepted as the 'gold standard', and are performed at most institutions. Other procedures, such as laparoscopic pyeloplasty and laparoscopic reconstructive surgery, have only recently been introduced and are primarily available at centers with surgeons experienced in laparoscopy. It is our hope that minimally invasive surgical approaches to urologic conditions will become available to all children and become commonplace at most institutions.     

Sakrokolpopexie – pro laparoskopisch

Innovative techniques have a really magical attraction for physicians as well as for patients. The number of robotic-assisted procedures worldwide has almost tripled from 80,000 procedures in the year 2007 to 205,000 procedures in 2010. In the same time the total number of Da Vinci surgery systems sold climbed from 800 to 1,400. Advantages, such as three-dimensional visualization, a tremor-filter, an excellent instrument handling with 6 degrees of freedom and better ergonomics, together with aggressive marketing led to a veritable flood of new Da Vinci acquisitions in the whole world. Many just took the opportunity to introduce a new instrument to save a long learning curve and start immediately in the surgical master class.If Da Vinci sacrocolpopexy is compared with the conventional laparoscopic approach, robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy shows a significantly longer duration of the procedure, a higher need for postoperative analgesics, much higher costs and an identical functional outcome without any advantage over the conventional laparoscopic approach. Although the use of robotic-assisted systems shows a significantly lower learning curve for laparoscopic beginners, it only shows minimal advantages for the experienced laparoscopic surgeon. Therefore it remains uncertain whether robotic-assisted surgery shows a significant advantage compared to the conventional laparoscopic surgery, especially with small reconstructive laparoscopic procedures such as sacrocolpopexy.     

Roboterunterstützte Laparoskopie in der Urologie Radikale Prostatektomie und rekonstruktive retroperitoneale Eingriffe

Complex reconstructive laparoscopic procedures in the field of urology such as radical prostatectomy and pyeloplasty have attracted increased attention in the past 2 years. However, extensive laparoscopic experience is required to master these procedures. Therefore, it remains questionable whether these techniques, which have been shown to be of profit to the patient in the hands of a specialist, will achieve widespread distribution. We have employed computer technology to bridge the gap between open surgery and laparoscopic access and used the daVinci Surgical System to establish laparoscopic radical prostatectomy as well as pyeloplasty and other retroperitoneal procedures at our institution. With experience of more than 70 procedures, we find that with the assistance of the daVinci Surgical System both radical prostatectomy and retroperiteoneal procedures can be easily translated from open to minimally invasive procedures with a considerably shorter learning curve and without compromising patient safety. We expect that large incisions will be soon a thing of the past in urologic surgery. Computer technology, together with mechanical engineering, will play a major role in enabling us to achieve better results despite minimal invasiveness.