Dosimetric benefits of placing dose constraints on the brachial plexus in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparative study

This study aimed to evaluate whether placing dose constraints on the brachial plexus (BP) could provide dosimetric benefits in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). Planning CT images for 30 patients with NPC treated with definitive IMRT were retrospectively reviewed. Target volumes, the BP and other critical structures were delineated; two separate IMRT plans were designed for each patient: one set no restrictions for the BP; the other considered the BP as a critical structure for which a maximum dose limit of ≤66 Gy was set. No significant differences between the two plans were observed in the conformity index, homogeneity index, maximum dose to the planning target volumes (PTVs), minimum dose to the PTVs, percentages of the volume of the PTVnx and PTVnd receiving more than 110% of the prescribed dose, or percentages of the volume of the PTVs receiving 95% and > 93% of the prescribed dose. Dose constraints significantly reduced the maximum dose, mean dose, V45, V50, V54, V60, V66 and V70 to the BP. Dose constraints significantly reduced the maximum dose to the BP, V45, V60 and V66 in both N0–1 and N2–3 disease; however, the magnitude of the dosimetric gain for each parameter between N0–1 and N2–3 disease was not significantly different, except for the V60 and V66. In conclusion, placing dose constraints on the BP can significantly decrease the irradiated volume and dose, without compromising adequate dose delivery to the target volume.     

Assessment of anatomical and dosimetric changes by a deformable registration method during the course of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

The aim of this study was to quantify the anatomic variations and the dosimetric effects accessed by a deformable registration method throughout the entire course of radiotherapy, and to evaluate the necessity of replanning for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). Plan1(CT1) was based on the original CT, and Plan2(CT2) was generated from the midtreatment CT scan acquired after 25 fractions of IMRT of Plan1. Both sets of CTs, RT structures and RT doses for the two group plans were transferred to a workstation, and then a hybrid IMRT plan, Plan1(CT2), was generated by deforming doses of Plan1 to CT2. Subsequently, the accumulated plan, Plan1 + 2(CT2), was generated to quantify the actual dosimetric effects during the course. The transverse diameter of the neck at the center of the odontoid process was (15.4 ± 1.0) cm and (14.4 ± 1.1) cm in CT1 and CT2, respectively (P < 0.05). Compared with CT1, the mean volumes of the right and left parotid glands were significantly decreased by (24.6 ± 11.9)% and (35.1 ± 20.1)%, respectively. Comparison of Plan1 (CT1) with Plan1 (CT2) indicated that the doses to targets decreased without replanning. With repeated CT and replanning after 25 fractions, the doses to targets would be improved. The doses to normal tissue were increased without replanning. For eight patients out of 12, the doses to the spinal cord and brainstem exceeded the constraints without replanning, while the corresponding values decreased with replanning. During the entire course of IMRT, the volumes of the targets and the parotid glands would be reduced significantly. Midtreatment CT scanning and replanning are recommended to ensure adaptive doses to the targets and critical normal tissues.     

Dose–volume histogram comparison between static 5-field IMRT with 18-MV X-rays and helical tomotherapy with 6-MV X-rays

We treated prostate cancer patients with static 5-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using linac 18-MV X-rays or tomotherapy with 6-MV X-rays. As X-ray energies differ, we hypothesized that 18-MV photon IMRT may be better for large patients and tomotherapy may be more suitable for small patients. Thus, we compared dose–volume parameters for the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) in 59 patients with T1–3 N0M0 prostate cancer who had been treated using 5-field IMRT. For these same patients, tomotherapy plans were also prepared for comparison. In addition, plans of 18 patients who were actually treated with tomotherapy were analyzed. The evaluated parameters were homogeneity indicies and a conformity index for the PTVs, and D2 (dose received by 2% of the PTV in Gy), D98, Dmean and V_{10–70 Gy} (%) for OARs. To evaluate differences by body size, patients with a known body mass index were grouped by that index ( <21; 21–25; and >25 kg/m²). For the PTV, all parameters were higher in the tomotherapy plans compared with the 5-field IMRT plans. For the rectum, V_{10 Gy} and V_{60 Gy} were higher, whereas V_{20 Gy} and V_{30 Gy} were lower in the tomotherapy plans. For the bladder, all parameters were higher in the tomotherapy plans. However, both plans were considered clinically acceptable. Similar trends were observed in 18 patients treated with tomotherapy. Obvious trends were not observed for body size. Tomotherapy provides equivalent dose distributions for PTVs and OARs compared with 18-MV 5-field IMRT. Tomotherapy could be used as a substitute for high-energy photon IMRT for prostate cancer regardless of body size.     

晚期胸腺瘤精确放疗计划的剂量学对比研究

目的 放疗是不可手术切除的晚期胸腺瘤重要的姑息性治疗手段。本研究拟对比不可手术切除胸腺瘤三维适形调强放疗（IMRT）、容积旋转调强放疗（VMAT）及螺旋断层放射治疗（TOMO）的剂量学参数，为晚期胸腺瘤放疗技术的选择提供理论依据。方法 选取本院9例接受姑息性放疗的晚期不可手术切除胸腺瘤患者，勾画放疗靶区及危及器官，传输至Raystation及TOMO计划系统，分别评估三组计划的等剂量曲线分布图、剂量体积直方图、均匀性指数、适形性指数以及危及器官受照剂量。结果 三组计划均能够满足处方剂量要求及危及器官限量。PGTV，TOMO组等剂量曲线覆盖体积的适形性及剂量均匀性优于IMRT及VMAT组，TOMO组的中位V₅为41.858%，小于IMRT组的45.9%，同时小于VMAT组的48.86%，TOMO组的中位V₂₀为20.25%，小于IMRT组的23.78%。TOMO组心脏的中位V₄₀为23.576%，明显小于VMAT组的27.81%。脊髓中位D_max相比，TOMO组为37.65 Gy，小于IMRT组的38.39 Gy及VMAT组的39.6 Gy。结论 不可手术切除的晚期胸腺瘤，与IMRT及VMAT相比，TOMO放疗计划具有更优的靶区适形性及剂量分布均匀性，并可减少双肺、心脏及脊髓的受照剂量。     

Analysis of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy (SMART) for nasopharyngeal carcinomas

The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes of simultaneous modulated accelerated radiotherapy (SMART) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). A total of 97 patients who underwent SMART for NPC between August 2005 and November 2011 were evaluated. The prescribed dose was 69.9 Gy/30 fractions at 2.33 Gy/fraction to the primary gross tumor volume (PGTV) including the nasopharynx gross target volume and the positive neck lymph nodes, and 60 Gy/30 fraction at 2.0 Gy/fraction to the PCTV1; 54 Gy/30 fractions at 1.8 Gy/fraction was given to the PCTV2. Among 59 patients with local advanced disease, 31 patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (chemo-RT) with a regimen consisting of 135 mg/m² paclitaxel on Day 1 and 25 mg/m² cisplatin on Days 1–3. The median follow-up period was 42 months. The local control rate (LCR), distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 93.3%, 90.3% and 91.6% at 3 years, and 87.6%, 87.9% and 85.7% at 5 years, respectively. There was no significant difference in outcome with respect to these three indicators for Stage III and IV disease treated with/without concurrent chemoradiotherapy (P > 0.05). Acute toxicities included Grade 3 mucositis, skin desquamation, and leucopenia, which occurred in 78 (80.4%), 8 (8.2%), and 45 (46.4%) patients, respectively. No patient had a Grade 3–4 late toxicity. SMART was associated with a favorable outcome for NPC with acceptable toxicity. The local-regional control was excellent but distant metastasis remains the main risk. The combination of SMART and chemotherapy needs to be optimized through further studies to enhance outcomes for locally advanced diseases.     

Evaluation of dosimetric variance in whole breast forward-planned intensity-modulated radiotherapy based on 4DCT and 3DCT

This study was performed to explore and compare the dosimetric variance caused by respiratory movement in the breast during forward-planned IMRT after breast-conserving surgery. A total of 17 enrolled patients underwent the 3DCT simulation scans followed by 4DCT simulation scans during free breathing. The treatment planning constructed using the 3DCT images was copied and applied to the end expiration (EE) and end inspiration (EI) scans and the dose distributions were calculated separately. CTV volume variance amplitude was very small (11.93 ± 28.64 cm³), and the percentage change of CTV volumes receiving 50 Gy and 55 Gy between different scans were all less than 0.8%. There was no statistically significant difference between EI and EE scans (Z =–0.26, P = 0.795). However, significant differences were found when comparing the D_mean at 3DCT planning with the EI and EE planning (P = 0.010 and 0.019, respectively). The homogeneity index at EI, EE and 3D plannings were 0.139, 0.141 and 0.127, respectively, and significant differences existed between 3D and EI, and between 3D and EE (P = 0.001 and 0.006, respectively). The conformal index (CI) increased significantly in 3D treatment planning (0.74 ± 0.07) compared with the EI and EE phase plannings (P = 0.005 and 0.005, respectively). The V₃₀, V₄₀, V₅₀ and D_mean of the ipsilateral lung for EE phase planning were significantly lower than for EI (P = 0.001–0.042). There were no significant differences in all the DVH parameters for the heart among these plannings (P = 0.128–0.866). The breast deformation during respiration can be disregarded in whole breast IMRT. 3D treatment planning is sufficient for whole breast forward-planned IMRT on the basis of our DVH analysis, but 4D treatment planning, breath-hold, or respiratory gate may ensure precise delivery of radiation dose.     

Dose-volume analysis for respiratory toxicity in intrathoracic esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy using extended fields

Purpose: We evaluated the relationship between dosimetric parameters (DPs) and the incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP) and investigated the feasibility of a proposed treatment planning technique with the potential of reducing RP in esophageal cancer patients treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy using extended fields. Patients and Methods: A total of 149 patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer were prospectively enrolled for extended-field radiotherapy (EFRT) to three-field regional lymphatics between September 2004 and June 2009. We retrospectively reviewed 86 consecutive patients who were treated with a total dose of 50.4 Gy (plus an optional 9 Gy boost) and were available for dose-volume analysis. Lung DPs of patients in the Grade 0–1 RP (RP_G≤1) group and the Grade 2–5 RP (RP_G≥2) group were compared. We compared the proposed plan with the conventional plan to 50.4 Gy on DPs for each case. Results: Of these 86 patients, 10 (12%) developed RP_G≥2 (Grade 2, n = 2 patients; Grade 3, n = 3; Grade 4, n = 3; Grade 5, n = 2). The patients in the RP_G≤1 group showed significantly lower (P < 0.05) V5 and V10 values for the whole lung compared with those in the RP_G≥2 group. There were two advantages gained from the proposed plan for V5 (<55%) and V10 (< 37%) values and the conformity of the PTV. Conclusion: The increase in the volume of the lung exposed to low doses of EFRT was found to be associated with the incidence of RP. Our proposed plan is likely to reduce the incidence of RP.     

Association between absolute volumes of lung spared from low-dose irradiation and radiation-induced lung injury after intensity-modulated radiotherapy in lung cancer: a retrospective analysis

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between absolute volumes of lung spared from low-dose irradiation and radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for lung cancer. The normal lung relative volumes receiving greater than 5, 10, 20 and 30 Gy (V5–30) mean lung dose (MLD), and absolute volumes spared from greater than 5, 10, 20 and 30 Gy (AVS5–30) for the bilateral and ipsilateral lungs of 83 patients were recorded. Any association of clinical factors and dose–volume parameters with Grade ≥2 RILI was analyzed. The median follow-up was 12.3 months; 18 (21.7%) cases of Grade 2 RILI, seven (8.4%) of Grade 3 and two (2.4%) of Grade 4 were observed. Univariate analysis revealed the located lobe of the primary tumor. V5, V10, V20, MLD of the ipsilateral lung, V5, V10, V20, V30 and MLD of the bilateral lung, and AVS5 and AVS10 of the ipsilateral lung were associated with Grade ≥2 RILI (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis indicated AVS5 of the ipsilateral lung was prognostic for Grade ≥2 RILI (P = 0.010, OR = 0.272, 95% CI: 0.102–0.729). Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated Grade ≥2 RILI could be predicted using AVS5 of the ipsilateral lung (area under curve, 0.668; cutoff value, 564.9 cm³; sensitivity, 60.7%; specificity, 70.4%). The incidence of Grade ≥2 RILI was significantly lower with AVS5 of the ipsilateral lung ≥564.9 cm³ than with AVS5 < 564.9 cm³ (P = 0.008). Low-dose irradiation relative volumes and MLD of the bilateral or ipsilateral lung were associated with Grade ≥2 RILI, and AVS5 of the ipsilateral lung was prognostic for Grade ≥2 RILI for lung cancer after IMRT.     

Dosimetric study of a respiratory gating technique based on four-dimensional computed tomography in non-small-cell lung cancer

This study sought to compare the differences in target volumes and dose distributions to the targets and organs at risk (OARs) between a four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT)-based respiratory-gated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan (Plan_EOE) and a three-dimensional CT (3DCT)-based IMRT plan (Plan_3D) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). For 17 patients with Stages I–III NSCLC, both 4DCT data and conventional 3DCT data were obtained. The Plan_3D and Plan_EOE were designed based on 3DCT data and 4DCT data, respectively. The displacements of the gross tumor volume (GTV) centroid were 0.13 ± 0.09 cm, 0.15 ± 0.1 cm, and 0.27 ± 0.27 cm in the right–left, anterior–posterior, and superior–inferior directions, respectively. The volume of the GTV_EOE was 3.05 ± 5.17 cm³ larger than that of the GTV_3D. The volume of the PTV_3D was 72.82 ± 48.65 cm³ larger than that of the PTV_EOE. There was no significant difference between the PTV_3D and PTV_EOE for V55.8, V60, V66 and the homogeneity index. The PTV_3D had a lower target conformity index than the PTV_EOE (P = 0.036). Plan_EOE had a significantly lower lung V10, V20, V30, V40 and mean lung dose (MLD) than Plan_3D. For the heart, Plan_EOE had a significantly lower V₃₀ and mean dose. In conclusion, 4DCT is an appropriate method for assessing the displacement of the GTV centroid in three dimensions. Plan_EOE has smaller PTVs and a decreased dose and volume for the normal lung and heart, as compared with Plan_3D.     

VMAT–SBRT planning based on an average intensity projection for lung tumors located in close proximity to the diaphragm: a phantom and clinical validity study

The aim of the this study was to validate the use of an average intensity projection (AIP) for volumetric-modulated arc therapy for stereotactic body radiation therapy (VMAT–SBRT) planning for a moving lung tumor located near the diaphragm. VMAT–SBRT plans were created using AIPs reconstructed from 10 phases of 4DCT images that were acquired with a target phantom moving with amplitudes of 5, 10, 20 and 30 mm. To generate a 4D dose distribution, the static dose for each phase was recalculated and the doses were accumulated by using the phantom position known for each phase. For 10 patients with lung tumors, a deformable registration was used to generate 4D dose distributions. Doses to the target volume obtained from the AIP plan and the 4D plan were compared, as were the doses obtained from each plan to the organs at risk (OARs). In both phantom and clinical study, dose discrepancies for all parameters of the dose volume (D_min, D₉₉, D_max, D₁ and D_mean) to the target were <3%. The discrepancies of D_max for spinal cord, esophagus and heart were <1 Gy, and the discrepancy of V20 for lung tissue was <1%. However, for OARs with large respiratory motion, the discrepancy of the D_max was as much as 9.6 Gy for liver and 5.7 Gy for stomach. Thus, AIP is clinically acceptable as a planning CT image for predicting 4D dose, but doses to the OARs with large respiratory motion were underestimated with the AIP approach.     

左乳癌保乳术后4种放疗计划的剂量学比较

目的 比较左侧乳腺癌保乳术后行全乳放射治疗时4种放射治疗计划的靶区及危机器官剂量学差异,探讨保乳术后较优的放疗治疗方式.方法 随机选取23例左侧乳腺癌术后行全乳放射放疗患者,给予PTV 25分·次、50 Gy处方剂量;分别设计适形混合调强计划(Hybrid_IMRT)、限制铅门多野调强计划(restricted jaw...     

Secondary cancer risk from modern external-beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients: Impact of fractionation and dose distribution

Modern radiotherapy (RT) uses altered fractionation, long beam-on time and image-guided procedure. This study aimed to compare secondary cancer risk (SCR) associated with primary field, scatter/leakage radiations and image-guided procedure in prostate treatment using intensity-modulated RT (IMRT), CyberKnife stereotactic body RT (CK-SBRT) in relative to 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT). Prostate plans were generated for 3D-CRT, IMRT (39 fractions of 2 Gy), and CK-SBRT (five fractions of 7.25 Gy). Excess absolute risk (EAR) was calculated for organs in the primary field using Schneider’s mechanistic model and concept of organ equivalent dose (OED) to account for dose inhomogeneity. Doses from image-guided procedure and scatter/leakage radiations were determined by phantom measurements. The results showed that hypofractionation relative to conventional fractionation yielded lower SCR for organs in primary field (p ≤ 0.0001). SCR was further modulated by dose-volume distribution. For organs near the field edge, like the rectum and pelvic bone, CK-SBRT plan rendered better risk profiles than IMRT and 3D-CRT because of the absence of volume peak in high dose region (relative risk [RR]: 0.65, 0.22, respectively, p ≤ 0.0004). CK-SBRT and IMRT generated more scatter/leakage and imaging doses than 3D-CRT (p ≤ 0.0002). But primary field was the major contributor to SCR. EAR estimates (risk contributions, primary field: scatter/leakage radiations: imaging procedure) were 7.1 excess cases per 10⁴ person–year (PY; 3.64:2.25:1) for CK-SBRT, 9.93 (7.32:2.33:1) for IMRT and 8.24 (15.99:2.35:1) for 3D-CRT (p ≤ 0.0002). We conclude that modern RT added more but small SCR from scatter/leakage and imaging doses. The primary field is a major contributor of risk which can be mitigated by the use of hypofractionation.     

Developing an adaptive radiation therapy strategy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) has recently been introduced to restore the planned dose distribution by accounting for the anatomic changes during treatment. By quantifying the anatomic changes in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, this study aimed to establish an ART strategy for NPC cases. A total of 30 NPC patients treated with helical tomotherapy were recruited. In the pretreatment megavoltage CT images, the anatomic changes of the posterolateral wall of nasopharynx (P-NP), neck region and parotid glands were measured and assessed. One-way repeated measure ANOVA was employed to define threshold(s) at any time-point. The presence of a threshold(s) would indicate significant anatomical change(s) such that replanning should be suggested. A pragmatic schedule for ART was established by evaluating the threshold for each parameter. Results showed the P-NP, parotid gland and neck volumes demonstrated significant regressions over time. Respectively, the mean loss rates were 0.99, 1.35, and 0.39 %/day, and the mean volume losses were 35.70, 47.54 and 11.91% (all P < 0.001). The parotid gland shifted medially and superiorly over time by a mean of 0.34 and 0.24 cm, respectively (all P < 0.001). The neck region showed non-rigid posterior displacement, which increased from upper to lower neck. According to the threshold occurrences, three replans at 9th, 19th and 29th fractions were proposed. This ART strategy was able to accommodate the dosimetric consequences due to anatomic deviation over the treatment course. It is clinically feasible and would be recommended for centers where an adaptive planning system was not yet available.     

Comparison of dose–volume histograms between proton beam and X-ray conformal radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

The purpose of this study was to compare the parameters of the dose–volume histogram (DVH) between proton beam therapy (PBT) and X-ray conformal radiotherapy (XCRT) for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to the tumor conditions. A total of 35 patients having NSCLC treated with PBT were enrolled in this analysis. The numbers of TNM stage and lymph node status were IIB (n = 3), IIIA (n = 15) and IIIB (n = 17), and N0 (n = 2), N1 (n = 4), N2 (n = 17) and N3 (n = 12), respectively. Plans for XCRT were simulated based on the same CT, and the same clinical target volume (CTV) was used based on the actual PBT plan. The treatment dose was 74 Gy-equivalent dose (GyE) for the primary site and 66 GyE for positive lymph nodes. The parameters were then calculated according to the normal lung dose, and the irradiation volumes of the doses (Vx) were compared. We also evaluated the feasibility of both plans according to criteria: V5 ≥ 42%, V20 ≥ 25%, mean lung dose ≥ 20 Gy. The mean normal lung dose and V5 to V50 were significantly lower in PBT than in XCRT. The differences were greater with the more advanced nodal status and with the larger CTV. Furthermore, 45.7% of the X-ray plans were classified as inadequate according to the criteria, whereas 17.1% of the proton plans were considered unsuitable. The number of inadequate X-ray plans increased in cases with advanced nodal stage. This study indicated that some patients who cannot receive photon radiotherapy may be able to be treated using PBT.     

乳腺癌保乳术后动态调强放疗与常规放疗的剂量学比较

目的 比较早期乳腺癌保乳术后动态调强放疗(intensity modulated radiotherapy,IMRT)与常规放疗(conventional radiotherapy,CRT)的剂量学分布,为IMRT在乳腺癌保乳术后放疗中的应用提供依据。方法 选取12例保乳术后乳腺癌患者,针对每个患者分别设计IMRT计划和CRT计划,处方剂量均为50 Gy/25次,利用剂量体积直方图(DVH图)比较两种计划的靶区和危及器官的剂量学差异。结果 两种计划中95%等剂量曲线包绕计划靶区的体积相似,分别为98.22%和98.76%(P > 0.05);IMRT计划计划靶区的V_105%、V_110%分别为12.86%、1.02%低于CRT计划的44.56%、6.37%(P < 0.05);IMRT计划计划靶区的CI值由0.55提高至0.68,HI值由1.15降至1.09(P < 0.05)。与CRT计划相比,IMRT计划患侧肺V₃₀、V₂₀分别降低了3.68%和5.75%,同时肺平均剂量(MLD)由9.24 Gy下降至7.12 Gy(P < 0.05);IMRT计划将左侧乳腺癌患者心脏V₃₀、V₄₀和V₅₀分别降低了5.99%、5.68%和1.68%(P < 0.05)。结论 IMRT相比CRT在保证靶区覆盖率的同时,减少了高剂量的照射,改善了靶区剂量分布的均匀性,同时降低了周围正常器官的照射剂量。     

Dosimetry analyses comparing high-dose-rate brachytherapy,administered as monotherapy for localized prostate cancer,with stereotactic body radiation therapy simulated using CyberKnife

The purpose of this study was to perform dosimetry analyses comparing high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with simulated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We selected six consecutive patients treated with HDR-BT monotherapy in 2010, and a CyberKnife SBRT plan was simulated for each patient using computed tomography images and the contouring set used in the HDR-BT plan for the actual treatment, but adding appropriate planning target volume (PTV) margins for SBRT. Then, dosimetric profiles for PTVs of the rectum, bladder and urethra were compared between the two modalities. The SBRT plan was more homogenous and provided lower dose concentration but better coverage for the PTV. The maximum doses in the rectum were higher in the HDR-BT plans. However, the HDR-BT plan provided a sharper dose fall-off around the PTV, resulting in a significant and considerable difference in volume sparing of the rectum with the appropriate PTV margins added for SBRT. While the rectum D5cm³ for HDR-BT and SBRT was 30.7 and 38.3 Gy (P < 0.01) and V40 was 16.3 and 20.8 cm³ (P < 0.01), respectively, SBRT was significantly superior in almost all dosimetric profiles for the bladder and urethra. These results suggest that SBRT as an alternative to HDR-BT in hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer might have an advantage for bladder and urethra dose sparing, but for the rectum only when proper PTV margins for SBRT are adopted.     

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced low rectal cancer using intensity-modulated radiotherapy to spare the intestines: a single-institutional pilot trial

The irradiated volume of intestines is associated with gastrointestinal toxicity in preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. The current trial prospectively explored how much of the irradiated volume of intestines was reduced by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) compared with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and whether IMRT might alleviate the acute gastrointestinal toxicity in this population. The treatment protocol encompassed preoperative chemoradiotherapy using IMRT plus surgery for patients with clinical T3–4, N0–2 low rectal cancer. IMRT delivered 45 Gy per 25 fractions for gross tumors, mesorectal and lateral lymph nodal regions, and tried to reduce the volume of intestines receiving 15 Gy (V_{15 Gy}) < 120 cc and V_{45 Gy} ≤ 0 cc, respectively, while keeping target coverage. S-1 and irinotecan were concurrently administered. Acute gastrointestinal toxicity, rates of clinical downstaging, sphincter preservation, local regional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Twelve enrolled patients completed the chemoradiotherapy protocol. The volumes of intestines receiving medium to high doses were reduced by the current IMRT protocol compared to 3DCRT; however, the predefined constraint of V_{15 Gy} was met only in three patients. The rate of ≥ grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity excluding anorectal symptoms was 17%. The rates of clinical downstaging, sphincter preservation, three-year LRC and OS were 75%, 92%, 92% and 92%, respectively. In conclusion, preoperative chemoradiotherapy using IMRT for this population might alleviate acute gastrointestinal toxicity, achieving high LRC and sphincter preservation; although further advancement is required to reduce the irradiated volume of intestines, especially those receiving low doses.     

Adaptive replanning intensity-modulated radiotherapy for choroidal metastasis of breast cancer using optical coherence tomography

Swept source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) is a convenient method for precise, early-stage detection of choroidal metastatic lesions, involving assessment of tumor response, and for regular follow-up studies. Using information obtained with SS-OCT, we performed intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for a patient with choroidal metastasis from breast cancer with more accuracy than had been previously possible. We made replanning adaptive radiotherapy (ART) three times based on the rapid tumor shrinkage detected by weekly assessments with SS-OCT. Accordingly, the planning target volume (PTV) decreased from 1.6 cm³ to 0.61 cm³ (38%), with 0.95 cm³ (59%) and 0.75 cm³ (46%) as intermediate values during the treatment course. The D_{0.1 cm3} of the right optic nerve was also reduced from 1.70 Gy/fraction to 0.69 Gy/faction, with 1.41 Gy/fraction and 1.29 Gy/fraction as intermediate values. Adaptive replanning IMRT made it possible to perform locally curative treatment of the metastatic choroidal lesion with a higher dose for the PTV, and a lower dose for organs at risk (OARs).     

Rectal dose-sparing effect with bioabsorbable spacer placement in carbon ion radiotherapy for sacral chordoma: dosimetric comparison of a simulation study

It is difficult to treat patients with an inoperable sarcoma adjacent to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract using carbon ion radiotherapy (C-ion RT), owing to the possible development of serious GI toxicities. In such cases, spacer placement may be useful in physically separating the tumor and the GI tract. We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of spacer placement by conducting a simulation study of dosimetric comparison in a patient with sacral chordoma adjacent to the rectum treated with C-ion RT. The sacral chordoma was located in the third to fourth sacral spinal segments, in extensive contact with and compressing the rectum. Conventional C-ion RT was not indicated because the rectal dose would exceed the tolerance dose. Because we chose spacer placement surgery to physically separate the tumor and the rectum before C-ion RT, bioabsorbable spacer sheets were inserted by open surgery. After spacer placement, 67.2 Gy [relative biological effectiveness (RBE)] of C-ion RT was administered. The thickness of the spacer was stable at 13–14 mm during C-ion RT. Comparing the dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters, D_max for the rectum was reduced from 67 Gy (RBE) in the no spacer plan (simulation plan) to 45 Gy (RBE) in the spacer placement plan (actual plan) when a prescribed dose was administered to the tumor. Spacer placement was advantageous for irradiating the tumor and the rectum, demonstrated using the DVH parameter analysis.