FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab 5 mg/kg versus 10 mg/kg as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed first-line bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based therapy: a randomized phase III study (EAGLE Study)

We planned a multicenter randomized phase III study to evaluate the efficacy of appropriate dose of bevacizumab (5 or 10 mg/kg) with FOLFIRI in patients with advanced/metastatic colorectal cancer who have failed prior bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based therapy. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival. The secondary endpoints are the toxicity, response rate, time to treatment failure, overall survival, overall survival from the start of the first-line treatment and second progression-free survival (time duration from the initiation of the first-line treatment until progression after the protocol treatment). A total of 370 patients were considered to be appropriate for this trial.     

Randomized phase III study of bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (WJOG4407G)

BackgroundFOLFIRI and FOLFOX have shown equivalent efficacy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), but their comparative effectiveness is unknown when combined with bevacizumab.Patients and methodsWJOG4407G was a randomized, open-label, phase III trial conducted in Japan. Patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomized 1:1 to receive either FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI + Bev) or mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab (mFOLFOX6 + Bev), stratified by institution, adjuvant chemotherapy, and liver-limited disease. The primary end point was non-inferiority of FOLFIRI + Bev to mFOLFOX6 + Bev in progression-free survival (PFS), with an expected hazard ratio (HR) of 0.9 and non-inferiority margin of 1.25 (power 0.85, one-sided α-error 0.025). The secondary end points were response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life (QoL) during 18 months. This trial is registered to the University Hospital Medical Information Network, number UMIN000001396.ResultsAmong 402 patients enrolled from September 2008 to January 2012, 395 patients were eligible for efficacy analysis. The median PFS for FOLFIRI + Bev (n = 197) and mFOLFOX6 + Bev (n = 198) were 12.1 and 10.7 months, respectively [HR, 0.905; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.723–1.133; P = 0.003 for non-inferiority]. The median OS for FOLFIRI + Bev and mFOLFOX6 + Bev were 31.4 and 30.1 months, respectively (HR, 0.990; 95% CI 0.785–1.249). The best overall RRs were 64% for FOLFIRI + Bev and 62% for mFOLFOX6 + Bev. The common grade 3 or higher adverse events were leukopenia (11% in FOLFIRI + Bev/5% in mFOLFOX6 + Bev), neutropenia (46%/35%), diarrhea (9%/5%), febrile neutropenia (5%/2%), peripheral neuropathy (0%/22%), and venous thromboembolism (6%/2%). The QoL assessed by FACT-C (TOI-PFC) and FACT/GOG-Ntx was favorable for FOLFIRI + Bev during 18 months.ConclusionFOLFIRI plus bevacizumab was non-inferior for PFS, compared with mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab, as the first-line systemic treatment for mCRC.Clinical trials numberUMIN000001396.     

FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a JACCRO CC-03 multicenter phase II study

Purpose

The purpose of this multicenter phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods

Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were eligible for enrollment. On day 1 of a 14-day cycle, patients received bevacizumab 5 mg/kg, irinotecan 150 mg/m², and l-leucovorin 200 mg/m² as an intravenous infusion, followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m² as an intravenous bolus and then 5-FU 2,400 mg/m² as an 46-h intravenous infusion. This treatment cycle was repeated. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

We enrolled 40 patients, but one withdrew consent before starting treatment. The remaining 39 patients received a total of 509 cycles of FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (median 11 per patient; range 1–30). The median PFS was 11.5 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 22.0 months, and the 1-year OS rate was 81.8 %. All 39 patients had adverse events. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and stomatitis occurred in 21 (53.9 %) and 4 (10.3 %) patients, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab is a clinically effective regimen with a manageable toxicity profile as first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.     

贝伐珠单抗联合FOLFIRl方案一线治疗转移性结直肠癌的临床研究

目的评价贝伐珠单抗联合FOLFIRI方案一线治疗转移性结直肠癌的疗效和安全性。方法将42例转移性结直肠癌患者随机分为FOLFIRI组和FOLFIRI＋贝伐珠单抗组。FOLFIRI组（n=21）采用伊立替康（CPT一11,180mg／m2,d1）＋甲酰四氢叶酸钙（CF,400mg／m2,d1）＋氟尿嘧啶（5-FU,400mg／m2,静脉推注,d1;然后5-FU,2400mg／m2,以微量泵进行持续静脉滴注46小时）。FOLFIRI＋贝伐珠单抗组（n=21）采用贝伐珠单抗（每2周5mg／kg,d1）＋FOLFIRI方案。2周为1个周期,3个周期后评价疗效。两组患者均持续治疗至病情进展或毒性不能耐受。结果42例患者均可评价疗效和不良反应。FOLFIRI组和FOLFIRI＋贝伐珠单抗组的治疗有效率分别为28．6％和61．9％,FOLFIRI＋贝伐珠单抗组的有效率显著高于FOLFIRI组（P=0．03）。FOLFIRI＋贝伐珠单抗组的临床获益率明显高于FOLFIRI组（90．5％US61．9％,P：0．03）。FOLFIRI组和FOLFIRI＋贝伐珠单抗组中位无疾病进展时间（progression—freesurvival,PFS）分别为6．6个月和10．0个月（P=0．000）。两组的主要不良反应为迟发性腹泻和中性粒细胞减少,贝伐珠单抗组增加的不良反应主要有高血压（P=0．002）、出血（P=0．001）和蛋白尿（P=0．035）。结论FOLFIRI方案化疗联用贝伐珠单抗提高了晚期结直肠癌患者治疗的有效率和临床获益率,并延长了PFS,不良反应患者可以耐受。     

Phase II clinical trial of second-line FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: AVASIRI trial

Objective

FOLFIRI is a standard chemotherapy regimen for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Although some studies have shown its efficacy in combination with bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy, there are no data to support FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy in patients with this form of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFIRI and bevacizumab as second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods

Eligible patients were ??20?years old, previously treated (except with irinotecan [CPT-11] and bevacizumab), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, 1, or 2, and adequate organ function. Twenty-five eligible patients received FOLFIRI with bevacizumab at a dose of 10?mg/kg given intravenously on day 1. All therapy was administered every 2?weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the response rate.

Results

Twenty-five patients were enrolled between February 2008 and March 2009. The median age was 62 (range 38?C73) years, the male/female distribution was 20/5, 16 patients had performance status 0 and 9 had performance status 1, and the proportion of patients who were oxaliplatin pretreated/untreated was 16/9. The overall response rate was 32% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 17.0?C50.4%), with 8 patients showing partial responses, 15 with stable disease, and 2 with disease progression. Median progression-free survival was 11.6?months (95% CI: 6.9?C16.4). Median overall survival was 21.4?months (95% CI: 12.0?C30.8). The grade 3/4 adverse events with treatment were neutropenia (64%), leukopenia (16%), diarrhea (8%), anorexia (8%), and febrile neutropenia (8%). The bevacizumab-related grade 3/4 adverse event was hypertension, which was observed in 12% of patients.

Conclusions

The FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab regimen is an active, well-tolerated second-line chemotherapy treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.     

First-line XELOX plus bevacizumab followed by XELOX plus bevacizumab or single-agent bevacizumab as maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the phase III MACRO TTD study

Purpose.

The aim of this phase III trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab alone with those of bevacizumab and capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) as maintenance treatment following induction chemotherapy with XELOX plus bevacizumab in the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Patients and Methods.

Patients were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of bevacizumab, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin every 3 weeks followed by XELOX plus bevacizumab or bevacizumab alone until progression. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) interval; secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS) time, objective response rate (RR), time to response, duration of response, and safety.

Results.

The intent-to-treat population comprised 480 patients (XELOX plus bevacizumab, n = 239; bevacizumab, n = 241); there were no significant differences in baseline characteristics. The median follow-up was 29.0 months (range, 0–53.2 months). There were no statistically significant differences in the median PFS or OS times or in the RR between the two arms. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities in the XELOX plus bevacizumab versus bevacizumab arms were diarrhea, hand–foot syndrome, and neuropathy.

Conclusion.

Although the noninferiority of bevacizumab versus XELOX plus bevacizumab cannot be confirmed, we can reliably exclude a median PFS detriment >3 weeks. This study suggests that maintenance therapy with single-agent bevacizumab may be an appropriate option following induction XELOX plus bevacizumab in mCRC patients.     

Secondary treatment and predictive factors for second-line chemotherapy after first-line oxaliplatin-based therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer

Two consecutive studies have evaluated the efficacy of oxaliplatin combined with the Nordic bolus schedule of 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid as first-line treatment in metastatic non-resectable colorectal cancer. One hundred and twelve patients were followed after end of first-line treatment and any secondary therapy registered. Fifty-three patients (47%) did not receive second-line irinotecan-based chemotherapy. The main reason was too poor performance status (59%). These patients had a median survival of only 1.7 months after progression of first-line therapy. The best predictive factors at start of first-line chemotherapy for receiving later second-line chemotherapy were performance status and alkaline phosphatase level. Fifty-nine patients (53%) received irinotecan-based second-line therapy. Four (7%) patients had a partial response, and 28 (52%) had stable disease. Median progression-free survival after second-line chemotherapy was 4.1 months and median survival 9.5 months. Median survival after first-line chemotherapy and secondary liver surgery was 34 months and five-year disease-free survival 8%. Survival among patients receiving both first- and second-line chemotherapy was 20.8 months, but only 8.9 months in patients not receiving second-line irinotecan-based chemotherapy. Poor performance status or elevated alkaline phosphatase level at start of first-line chemotherapy predicts whether second-line chemotherapy will be given or not.     

An open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial of panitumumab plus FOLFIRI as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

This prospective analysis evaluated the effect of tumor KRAS status on efficacy of second-line panitumumab plus folinic acid/5-fluorouracil/irinotecan (FOLFIRI).

Methods

This phase 2, open-label, single-arm study enrolled patients with unresectable, measurable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) after failure of first-line treatment with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Patients received panitumumab 6 mg/kg plus FOLFIRI every 2 weeks until disease progression or intolerability. Tumor assessments per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) were performed by the investigators every 8 weeks from weeks 8-32 and every 12 weeks thereafter. KRAS status was determined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on DNA extracted from fixed tumor sections. Efficacy endpoints included objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Safety endpoints included incidence of adverse events (AEs). Endpoints were evaluated by tumor KRAS status.

Results

Of 116 patients enrolled, 109 patients with known tumor KRAS status received treatment; 59% had wild-type KRAS, and 41% had mutant KRAS. Fifteen patients (23%) with wild-type KRAS and 7 patients (16%) with mutant KRAS had a complete or partial response to treatment. Median PFS was 26 weeks (95% CI, 19-33 weeks) and 19 weeks (95% CI, 12-25 weeks) in the wild-type KRAS and mutant KRAS strata, respectively. Median OS was 50 weeks (95% CI, 39-76 weeks) and 31 weeks (95% CI, 23-47 weeks) in wild-type KRAS and mutant KRAS strata, respectively. Skin-related toxicities (86% of all patients) and diarrhea (74%) were the most common AEs.

Conclusion

Panitumumab plus FOLFIRI numerically improved objective response rate, PFS, and OS in favor of patients with wild-type KRAS tumors. The safety profile was consistent with panitumumab plus FOLFIRI trials in similar patient populations.     

A phase III trial of exemestane plus bevacizumab maintenance therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer after first-line taxane and bevacizumab: a GINECO group study

BackgroundMaintenance strategies beyond response or tumor stabilization with first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have not been extensively studied. Endocrine therapy combined with continued bevacizumab may be a helpful option for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive MBC.Patients and methodsIn this prospective, open-label, phase III study, patients with histologically confirmed ER-positive, HER2-negative MBC and non-progressive disease after 16–24 weeks of taxane plus bevacizumab (T + BEV) were randomized to continuation of T + BEV or maintenance bevacizumab plus exemestane (E + BEV). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization. To have 80% power to detect an improvement in the 6-month PFS rate (PFS6m) from 50% to 65%, 186 assessable patients were needed for a total of 141 PFS events. An interim analysis was planned after 40% of the required events.ResultsThe interim analysis with 98 patients showed that the probability of reaching a statistically significant improvement in PFS by the end of the study was only 7%. This led the Independent Data and Monitoring Committee to recommend termination of patient enrollment. After a median of 21-month follow-up of all randomized patients (117 in total), PFS6m from randomization was 67.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 53.6–77.7] with T + BEV and 55.2% (95% CI 41.5–66.9) with E + BEV [hazard ratio (HR): 1.0, 95% CI 0.7–1.5, P = 0.998]. Median PFS from BEV initiation was 12.5 and 12.3 months in the T + BEV and E + BEV arms, respectively. In the T + BEV arm, taxane was prematurely stopped for the majority of patients (94.9%), mainly due to toxicity (49.2%). Updated data after 35 months' median follow-up showed death rates of 44% and 55% in T + BEV and E + BEV arms, respectively.ConclusionIn this trial, maintenance therapy with E + BEV in ER-positive, HER2-negative MBC patients with no evidence of progression after first-line T + BEV did not achieve longer PFS compared with continuation of T + BEV.ClinicalTrials.govNCT01303679     

Phase I/II study of bi-weekly XELIRI plus bevacizumab treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to oxaliplatin-based first-line chemotherapy

Purpose

We aimed to determine the recommended dose for bi-weekly XELIRI plus bevacizumab for second-line chemotherapy and examined its safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to oxaliplatin-based first-line chemotherapy.

Methods

Irinotecan and bevacizumab were administered as a continuous intravenous infusion on Day 1 at 150 mg/mm² and 5 mg/kg, respectively. Capecitabine was orally administered in two divided doses on Days 2–8. Each 2-week treatment cycle was defined as a single course of treatment. During Phase I, we determined the recommended dose for capecitabine. In Phase II trials, efficacy and treatment safety was verified (UMIN000003934).

Results

The recommended dose of capecitabine was determined to be 2000 mg/m². Median progression-free survival was 7.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.1–10.9 months], and median overall survival was 18.9 months (95% CI 11.6–28.4 months). Response rate was 17.4% (95% CI 6.4–28.3%). The most common Grade ≥3 hematotoxic adverse events were anemia (10.9%), neutropenia (10.9%), and leukopenia (8.7%), while the occurrence rate of Grade ≥3 non-hematotoxic adverse events was relatively low (<10%).

Conclusion

Bi-weekly XELIRI plus bevacizumab was found to be a safe and effective second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to oxaliplatin-based first-line chemotherapy.

     

FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer-subgroup analysis of patients with KRAS: mutated tumours in the randomised German AIO study KRK-0306

BackgroundThe AIO KRK-0306 trial compares the efficacy of infusional 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus cetuximab with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In October 2008, an amendment terminated the inclusion of patients with KRAS-mutated tumours. This subgroup of patients is evaluated in the present analysis, while the study is ongoing for patients with KRAS wild-type tumours.MethodsPatients were randomly assigned to FOLFIRI (Tournigand regimen) every 2 weeks plus cetuximab (400 mg/m² day 1, followed by 250 mg/m² weekly = arm A) or bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks = arm B). Among 336 randomised patients, KRAS mutation was demonstrated in 100 assessable patients. The primary study end point was objective response rate (ORR).ResultsORR was 44% [95% confidence interval (CI) 29% to 59%] in arm A versus 48% (95% CI, 33% to 62%) in arm B. Progression-free survival was 7.5 versus 8.9 months (hazard ratio: 1.0) and overall survival was 22.7 versus 18.7 months (hazard ratio: 0.86) in arms A versus B, respectively.ConclusionsThis is the first head to head comparison of cetuximab versus bevacizumab in first-line treatment of mCRC. In the present evaluation of patients with KRAS-mutated tumours, neither strategy demonstrated a clearly superior outcome.     

A phase II randomized multicenter trial of gefitinib plus FOLFIRI and FOLFIRI alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

BackgroundGefitinib inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase and preclinical studies indicate that it may enhance CPT-11 cytotoxicity. This randomized phase II trial investigates the feasibility and efficacy of gefitinib and 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Patients and methodsPatients were randomized to FOLFIRI ± gefitinib 250 mg daily p.o. Patients randomized to FOLFIRI + gefitinib without disease progression after 6 months continued to receive gefitinib alone until disease progression.ResultsFrom October 2002 to September 2004, 100 patients were enrolled. Twenty-three patients (47.9%) in the FOLFIRI arm and 23 (45.1%) in the FOLFIRI + gefitinib arm experienced an objective response. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8.3 and 18.6 months in the FOLFIRI arm, and 8.3 and 17.1 months in the FOLFIRI + gefitinib arm, respectively. In the combination arm, grades 3–4 adverse events were experienced by 35 (67.3%) patients versus 25 patients (52.1%) in the FOLFIRI arm; 12 patients (23.1%) withdrew for an adverse event in the FOLFIRI + gefitinib arm and 5 (10.4%) in the FOLFIRI arm.ConclusionsThese data show that adding gefitinib to FOLFIRI does not improve the efficacy of FOLFIRI regimen. These disappointing results could be related to the high toxicity observed that led to significant dose reductions and delays.     

Making sense of anti-EGFR plus oxaliplatin-based therapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

EGF receptor (EGFR) targeting in patients with wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer has been associated with clinical activity in first-, second- and third-line therapies. Panitumumab, a human monoclonal antibody that targets EGFRs, had previously been associated with tumor regressions and improved progression-free survival in patients with chemotherapy-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer. Douillard et al. have reported on the results of the Phase III Panitumumab Randomized Trial in Combination with Chemotherapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer to Determine Efficacy (PRIME) Phase III of fluoroucil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin, with and without panitumumab, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. This article focuses on the PRIME study and its implications on clinical practice. In addition, the results of the PRIME study in the context of another EGFR-targeting agent, cetuximab, when combined with oxaliplatin-based first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, is discussed.     

Effectiveness and safety of first-line bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Results of the ETNA observational cohort

ObjectivesEffectiveness of bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients has been investigated in observational studies, mainly associated with oxaliplatin-based regimens. Here, using the ETNA cohort in which the majority of patients received bevacizumab + FOLFIRI, the effectiveness of this combination in elderly patients is explored.Materials and MethodsPatients initiating first-line therapy with bevacizumab between January 2006 and December 2007 were identified in 28 French centres and followed for 24 months. Vital status was collected over 36 months. In the present analysis those who received FOLFIRI were retained (85% of those included), and patients were stratified by age (< 70/≥70 years). The Kaplan–Meier method estimated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and Cox models were used to assess the independent effect of age on survival outcomes.ResultsAmong the 351 patients who received bevacizumab + FOLFIRI, 33.9% were aged ≥ 70 years, 66.1% < 70 years. Respectively 15.1% and 9.5% of patients had ECOG-PS ≥ 2; 49.6% and 40.1% used ‘stop-and-go’ treatment scheduling; and 56.3% and 44.4% experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. Overall response rate was 58.8% and 62.5%. Median [95% confidence interval, CI] OS was respectively 24.1 [20.4; 26.2] and 28.5 [25.0; 31.0] months; age ≥ 70 years and ECOG-PS ≥ 2 were significantly associated with death. Median PFS [95% CI] was respectively 10.9 [9.4; 12.6] and 9.8 [9.2; 11.2] months; hepatic metastases was associated with progression, and age ≥ 70 years was associated with progression after 14 months of follow-up but not before.ConclusionsThe present study adds to the literature on the safe and beneficial effect of bevacizumab in the elderly receiving FOLFIRI regimen.     

FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in BRAF mutant metastatic colorectal cancer

BackgroundBRAF V600E mutation plays a negative prognostic role in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), leading to a median Progression Free Survival (PFS) of 4–6 months with first-line conventional treatments. Our group recently reported in a retrospective exploratory analysis of a phase II trial that FOLFOXIRI (5-FU/LV+Oxaliplatin+Irinotecan) plus bevacizumab might allow to achieve remarkable results in terms of PFS and Overall Survival (OS) also in this poor-prognosis subgroup. The aim of this work was to prospectively validate our retrospective finding.Patients and methodsThis phase II trial was designed to detect an increase in 6 month-Progression Free Rate (6 m-PFR) from 45% to 80% in a population of BRAF mutant mCRC patients treated with first-line FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab. Secondary end-points were PFS, OS, response rate (RR) and the analysis of outcome parameters in the pooled population consisting of both retrospectively and prospectively included patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01437618.ResultsTwo-hundred-fourteen potentially eligible mCRC patients were screened for BRAF mutational status. Fifteen BRAF mutant patients (7%) were included in the validation cohort. At a median follow up of 25.7 months, 6 m-PFR was 73%. Median PFS and OS were 9.2 and 24.1 months, respectively. In the pooled population, at a median follow up of 40.4 months, 6 m-PFR was 84%. Median PFS and OS were 11.8 and 24.1 months, respectively. Overall RR and disease control rate were 72% and 88%, respectively.ConclusionLacking randomised trials in this specific molecular subgroup, FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab might be a reasonable option for the first-line treatment of BRAF mutant mCRC patients.     

Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III non-inferiority trial (SAKK 41/06)

In this trial, stopping bevacizumab after completion of induction chemotherapy was associated with a shorter time to progression, but no statistically significant difference in overall survival compared with the bevacizumab continuation strategy. Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated. Treatment costs are substantially higher for continuous bevacizumab treatment.BackgroundChemotherapy plus bevacizumab is a standard option for first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. We assessed whether no continuation is non-inferior to continuation of bevacizumab after completing first-line chemotherapy.Patients and methodsIn an open-label, phase III multicentre trial, patients with mCRC without disease progression after 4–6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were randomly assigned to continuing bevacizumab at a standard dose or no treatment. CT scans were done every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). A non-inferiority limit for hazard ratio (HR) of 0.727 was chosen to detect a difference in TTP of 6 weeks or less, with a one-sided significance level of 10% and a statistical power of 85%.ResultsThe intention-to-treat population comprised 262 patients: median follow-up was 36.7 months. The median TTP was 4.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1–5.4] months for bevacizumab continuation versus 2.9 (95% CI 2.8–3.8) months for no continuation; HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58–0.96). Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated. The median overall survival was 25.4 months for bevacizumab continuation versus 23.8 months (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.63–1.1;P = 0.2) for no continuation. Severe adverse events were uncommon in the bevacizumab continuation arm. Costs for bevacizumab continuation were estimated to be ∼30 000 USD per patient.ConclusionsNon-inferiority could not be demonstrated for treatment holidays versus continuing bevacizumab monotheray, after 4–6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Based on no impact on overall survival and increased treatment costs, bevacizumab as a single agent is of no meaningful therapeutic value. More efficient treatment approaches are needed to maintain control of stabilized disease following induction therapy.Clinical trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00544700.     

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III ARTIST trial

The efficacy and safety of bevacizumab with modified irinotecan, leucovorin bolus, and 5-fluorouracil intravenous infusion (mIFL) in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has not been well evaluated in randomized clinical trials in Chinese patients. We conducted a phrase III trial in which patients with previously untreated mCRC were randomized 2:1 to the mIFL [irinotecan (125 mg/m(2)), leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)) bolus, and 5-fluorouracil intravenous infusion (500 mg/m(2)) weekly for four weeks every six weeks] plus bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every two weeks) group and the mIFL group, respectively. Co-primary objectives were progression-free survival (PFS) and 6-month PFS rate. In total, 214 patients were enrolled. Our results showed that addition of bevacizumab to mIFL significantly improved median PFS (4.2 months in the mIFL group vs. 8.3 months in the bevacizumab plus mIFL group, P < 0.001), 6-month PFS rate (25.0% vs. 62.6%, P < 0.001), median overall survival (13.4 months vs. 18.7 months, P = 0.014), and response rate (17% vs. 35%, P = 0.013). Grades 3 and 4 adverse events included diarrhea (21% in the mIFL group and 26% in the bevacizumab plus mIFL group) and neutropenia (19% in the mIFL group and 33% in the bevacizumab plus mIFL group). No wound-healing complications or congestive heart failure occurred. Our results suggested that bevacizumab plus mIFL is effective and well tolerated as first-line treatment for Chinese patients with mCRC. Clinical benefit and safety profiles were consistent with those observed in pivotal phase III trials with mainly Caucasian patients.