Palliative Access Through Care at Home: Experiences with an Urban, Geriatric Home Palliative Care Program

The aging of the U.S. population has resulted in a large number of persons with multiple, chronic illnesses and gradual functional decline. Many older adults with these conditions are homebound and have great difficulty accessing medical care. They are also more likely to suffer from unaddressed symptoms and end-of-life care needs. Certain groups, such as African-American patients and patients with dementia, are even less likely to access palliative care and hospice services. Although the informal caregivers attending to such persons may become overwhelmed without adequate support, palliative care, which covers a broad population, is an optimal way to address many of these needs. This article describes a unique, urban, home-based geriatrics palliative care program (Palliative Access Through Care at Home (PATCH)) designed to address some of these unmet needs. After 1 year of providing service, a mixed-methods study consisting of chart review, telephone interviews, and face-to-face interviews was conducted to assess caregiver expectations of and satisfaction with the program. Caregivers for the elderly, mostly African-American patients, more than half of whom had dementia, were overall very satisfied with their experience, despite the large amount of time necessary to provide the care that patients required. Themes extracted during qualitative analysis were the desire to remain at home, the need for easy access to a practitioner specializing in geriatrics and palliative medicine, and the challenges of transitions of care. PATCH was able to address many of these needs and provide high levels of caregiver satisfaction.     

Advance Care Planning Program and the Knowledge and Attitude Concerning Palliative Care

Objectives: The study aimed to evaluate the effects of an advance care planning (ACP) program on knowledge and attitudes concerning palliative care, and decisions regarding DNR orders in the older residents in a long-term care institution.

Methods: A quasi-experimental design was used. Participants were cognitively unimpaired older residents in a long-term care institution in Taiwan. The experimental group (n = 29) received the intervention including an individual interview using an ACP handbook and a group patient education; whereas the control group (n = 28) received the group patient education only.

Results: There were significant positive effects of the ACP program on understanding of DNR and palliative care, willingness to sign a DNR order, and knowledge of and attitude towards palliative care; however, there was no significant effect on willingness to receive palliative care. Six participants signed the DNR order after the intervention compared to none in the control group.

Conclusions: The ACP program can improve knowledge and attitudes towards palliative care in older residents in long-term care institutions.

Clinical Implications: The ACP program could incorporate multiple components, including individual interview using ACP handbook and group patient education, and address knowledge and attitudes towards palliative care.     

Identifying Palliative Care Champions to Promote High‐Quality Care to Those with Serious Illness

Leading medical authorities advocate for routine integration of palliative care for all major causes of death in the United States. With rapid growth and acceptance, the field of palliative care is tasked with addressing a compelling question of its time: “Who will deliver timely, evidence‐based palliative care to all who should benefit?” The current number of palliative care specialists will not suffice to meet the needs of persons with serious illness. In 2010, initial estimates quantified the shortage at 6000 to 18 000 additional palliative care physicians needed to fully staff existing programs. Unfortunately, the predicted number of specialty physicians in 2030 will likely not be larger than the workforce in existence today. These findings result in a physician‐to‐serious‐illness‐person ratio of about 1:28 000 in 2030.¹ To address the workforce shortage, stronger alignment is needed between intensity of patient needs and provision of palliative care services. Such an alignment better harnesses the talents of those in a position to deliver core palliative care services (such as discussing goals of care with patients or managing their symptoms) while engaging palliative care specialists to address more complex issues. We introduce the concept of “Palliative Care Champions,” who sit at the nexus between specialty palliative care and the larger clinical workforce. Acknowledging that the needs of most patients can be met by clinicians who have received basic palliative care training, and that specialty palliative care is not always available for those with more complex needs, there exists an important opportunity for those with additional interest to scale training and quality improvement to fill this void. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:S461–S467, 2019.     

Racial and Ethnic Variation in Pain Following Inpatient Palliative Care Consultations

Studies have documented high levels of pain in hospitalized individuals at the end of life, with minorities reporting higher levels of pain than whites. In response, inpatient palliative care (IPC) teams have grown rapidly to improve care of seriously ill individuals. Although research indicates that IPC teams effectively reduce and maintain control of pain, racial and ethnic differences in pain following IPC consultation remain unclear. This study investigated racial and ethnic pain differences after an IPC intervention in 385 seriously ill white, black, and Latino individuals aged 65 and older. Using the 11‐point Numeric Rating Scale for pain, individuals were asked to rate their pain intensity at four points during hospitalization (before IPC consultation, 2 and 24 hours after the consultation, and at hospital discharge). Results indicate that whites (F_{1.657, 173.998} = 16.528, P < .001), blacks (F_{1.800, 95.410} = 7.103, P = .002), and Latinos (F_{1.388, 73.584} = 10.902, P < .001) all experienced significant reductions in pain after the intervention. Adjusted multivariate models testing between‐group racial and ethnic differences revealed that Latinos were 62% more likely than whites to report experiencing pain at hospital discharge (relative risk = 0.38, 95% confidence interval = 0.15–0.97). Regardless of race or ethnicity, IPC effectively reduces and controls pain after consultation. Despite pain decreases, Latinos remain more likely than whites to report pain at follow‐up. Further research is needed to determine the mechanisms in operation and to better understand and address the needs of this population.